Metcalf et al., 1994 - Google Patents
Which cervical sampler? A comparison of four methodsMetcalf et al., 1994
- Document ID
- 2761992273317977010
- Author
- Metcalf K
- Sutton J
- Moloney M
- Brown L
- Peel K
- Baines A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Cytopathology
External Links
Snippet
Four cytology sampling methods were compared in 1063 patients referred for colposcopy with a recent abnormal smear. A dyskaryotic smear of any grade was considered a positive result, though comparisons were limited to cases with a subsequent biopsy confirming CINII …
- 238000001574 biopsy 0 abstract description 12
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B10/00—Other methods or instruments for diagnosis, e.g. instruments for taking a cell sample, for biopsy, for vaccination diagnosis; Sex determination; Ovulation-period determination; Throat striking implements
- A61B10/02—Instruments for taking cell samples or for biopsy
- A61B10/0291—Instruments for taking cell samples or for biopsy for uterus
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
- G01N33/689—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids related to pregnancy or the gonads
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
- G01N1/28—Preparing specimens for investigation including physical details of (bio-)chemical methods covered elsewhere, e.g. G01N33/50, C12Q
- G01N1/30—Staining; Impregnating Fixation; Dehydration; Multistep processes for preparing samples of tissue, cell or nucleic acid material and the like for analysis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Joseph et al. | Cyto‐histological correlates in a colposcopic clinic: A 1‐year prospective study | |
| Kinney et al. | Where’s the high-grade cervical neoplasia? The importance of minimally abnormal Papanicolaou diagnoses | |
| Jones et al. | The Cytobrush Plus cell collector in oral cytology | |
| Rosen | Frozen section diagnosis of breast lesions. Recent experience with 556 consecutive biopsies | |
| Kingston et al. | Role of frozen section and clinical parameters in distinguishing benign from malignant follicular neoplasms of the thyroid | |
| FROST | Diagnostic accuracy of “cervical smears” | |
| Byrne et al. | Randomized study of early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling: a technical and cytogenetic comparison of 650 patients | |
| Duggan et al. | The accuracy and interobserver reproducibility of endometrial dating | |
| Metcalf et al. | Which cervical sampler? A comparison of four methods | |
| Ronk et al. | Evaluation of abnormal cervical cytology | |
| Laverty et al. | The importance of the cell sample in cervical cytology: a controlled trial of a new sampling device | |
| Bronson et al. | A contribution to the electron microscopic morphometric analysis of peripheral nerve | |
| M. AUDU, AU EL-NAFATY, M. KHALIL, JAM OTUBU | Knowledge and attitude to cervical cancer screening among women in Maiduguri, Nigeria | |
| Tredway et al. | Correlation of endometrial dating with luteinizing hormone peak | |
| Möbius | Cytological early detection of cervical carcinoma: possibilities and limitations. Analysis of failures | |
| Kjaergaard et al. | Prognostic Value of Semen Analyses in infertility Evaluation (Male fertility/Life‐table analysis): Der prognostische Wert der Sperma‐Analyse bei der Infertilitäts‐Bewertung | |
| Boelter II et al. | The correlation between colposcopic grading, directed punch biopsy, and conization | |
| Prabhu et al. | Introduction to Pathology | |
| Rahnama et al. | Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear | |
| Dunn et al. | Comparing endocervical curettage and endocervical brush at colposcopy | |
| Pamphlett et al. | Needle muscle biopsy: will it make open biopsy obsolete? | |
| Carrow et al. | Evaluation of the vaginal irrigation smear technique | |
| Schou et al. | Cytological examination of mucosal secretion in nose, throat, oral cavity, and oesophagus by a replica method | |
| Chang | Some aspects of cervical screening in southern New Zealand; the situation before implementation of the national cervical cancer prevention programme | |
| Smith | Colposcopy |