[go: up one dir, main page]

Aubin et al., 2023 - Google Patents

Cadaveric gait simulation

Aubin et al., 2023

Document ID
2240687898663507606
Author
Aubin P
Ledoux W
Publication year
Publication venue
Foot and ankle biomechanics

External Links

Snippet

Cadaveric gait simulation has evolved from static tests representing small instances in the gait cycle to fully dynamic simulations from heel strike to toe off. In this chapter, we review dynamic simulations of stance phase. We describe the techniques used to generate the …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4528—Joints
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
    • A61B5/1122—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement of movement trajectories
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/1036—Measuring load distribution, e.g. podologic studies
    • A61B5/1038—Measuring plantar pressure during gait
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1124—Determining motor skills
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3437—Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30—Joints
    • A61F2/38—Joints for elbows or knees

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Nester et al. In vitro study of foot kinematics using a dynamic walking cadaver model
Park et al. Finite element analysis of knee and ankle joint during gait based on motion analysis
Hicks et al. Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement
Arndt et al. Intrinsic foot kinematics measured in vivo during the stance phase of slow running
Navacchia et al. A computationally efficient strategy to estimate muscle forces in a finite element musculoskeletal model of the lower limb
Gefen et al. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: a basic tool for clinical applications
Chao et al. Virtual interactive musculoskeletal system (VIMS) in orthopaedic research, education and clinical patient care
Kia et al. Evaluation of a musculoskeletal model with prosthetic knee through six experimental gait trials
Li Development and validation of a finite-element musculoskeletal model incorporating a deformable contact model of the hip joint during gait
Watanabe et al. Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and flatfoot: analysis with simulated walking
Guess et al. Predicted loading on the menisci during gait: The effect of horn laxity
Serrancolí et al. Influence of musculoskeletal model parameter values on prediction of accurate knee contact forces during walking
Baxter et al. Cadaveric gait simulation reproduces foot and ankle kinematics from population‐specific inputs
Febrer-Nafría et al. Comparison of different optimal control formulations for generating dynamically consistent crutch walking simulations using a torque-driven model
Curreli et al. Using musculoskeletal models to estimate in vivo total knee replacement kinematics and loads: effect of differences between models
Shu et al. In vivo kinematical validated knee model for preclinical testing of total knee replacement
Quinn et al. A digital twin framework for robust control of robotic-biological systems
Rahman et al. Prediction of elbow joint contact mechanics in the multibody framework
D’Hondt et al. A dynamic foot model for predictive simulations of gait reveals causal relations between foot structure and whole body mechanics
Suckel et al. Changes in Chopart joint load following tibiotalar arthrodesis: in vitro analysis of 8 cadaver specimen in a dynamic model
Huss et al. A mathematical model of forces in the knee under isometric quadriceps contractions
Natsakis et al. Inertial control as novel technique for in vitro gait simulations
Lim et al. Modelling of knee joint muscles during the swing phase of gait––a forward dynamics approach using MATLAB/Simulink
Aubin et al. Cadaveric gait simulation
Ledoux Role of robotic gait simulators in elucidating foot and ankle pathomechanics