[go: up one dir, main page]

Young Jr et al., 1994 - Google Patents

Assessing shade differences in acrylic resin denture and natural teeth

Young Jr et al., 1994

Document ID
18129627389909564949
Author
Young Jr L
Glaros A
Moore D
Collins J
Publication year
Publication venue
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

External Links

Snippet

Four experiments in this study assess shade differences in acrylic resin denture and natural teeth. The first two examine the perceptual errors made by experienced dentists in their use of a manufacturer-provided shade guide for acrylic resin denture teeth. In the first of four …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/10Supports for artificial teeth for transport or for comparison of the colour
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/05Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4538Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
    • A61B5/4542Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
    • A61B5/4547Evaluating teeth
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B3/00Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
    • A61B3/02Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient
    • A61B3/06Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient for testing light sensitivity, e.g. adaptation; for testing colour vision
    • A61B3/066Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient for testing light sensitivity, e.g. adaptation; for testing colour vision for testing colour vision
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C5/00Filling or capping teeth
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00Dental prostheses; Making same

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Brandt et al. In vivo study for tooth colour determination—visual versus digital
Gómez‐Polo et al. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE 2000 color difference formulas on gingival color space
Horn et al. Sphere spectrophotometer versus human evaluation of tooth shade
Da Silva et al. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction
Inokoshi et al. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials
Poljak-Guberina et al. Colour discrimination of dental professionals and colour deficient laypersons
Fürhauser et al. Evaluation of soft tissue around single‐tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score
Davison et al. Shade selection by color vision-defective dental personnel
Donahue et al. Shade color discrimination by men and women
Rodrigues et al. An evaluation of shade differences between natural anterior teeth in different age groups and gender using commercially available shade guides
Tsukiyama et al. Comparison of the anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in Asian and white subjects
Wolfart et al. Subjective and objective perception of upper incisors
Jaju et al. Evaluating tooth color matching ability of dental students
Fava et al. Single implant‐supported crowns in the aesthetic zone: patient satisfaction with aesthetic appearance compared with appraisals by laypeople and dentists
Mattoo et al. Subjective differences between dentists and patients about relative quality of metal ceramic restorations placed in the esthetic zone
JPH09253102A (en) Method of determining shape of tooth and color configuration of tooth
Bertl et al. Are colored periodontal probes reliable to classify the gingival phenotype in terms of gingival thickness?
Paravina Understanding color
Young Jr et al. Assessing shade differences in acrylic resin denture and natural teeth
Dummer et al. Factors influencing the caries experience of a group of children at the ages of 11–12 and 15–16 years: Results from an ongoing epidemiological survey
Aldegheishem et al. Perception of dental appearance and aesthetic analysis among patients, laypersons and dentists
Sharma et al. A study of relationship between skin color and tooth shade value in Population of Udaipur, Rajasthan
Kutkut et al. Comparison of the accuracy and reliability of instrumental shade selection devices and visual shade selection: An in vitro study
Ciucchi et al. Incisor inclination and perceived tooth colour changes
Burnett Clinical rest and closest speech positions in the determination of occlusal vertical dimension