Young Jr et al., 1994 - Google Patents
Assessing shade differences in acrylic resin denture and natural teethYoung Jr et al., 1994
- Document ID
- 18129627389909564949
- Author
- Young Jr L
- Glaros A
- Moore D
- Collins J
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
External Links
Snippet
Four experiments in this study assess shade differences in acrylic resin denture and natural teeth. The first two examine the perceptual errors made by experienced dentists in their use of a manufacturer-provided shade guide for acrylic resin denture teeth. In the first of four …
- 210000000515 Tooth 0 title abstract description 64
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
- A61C19/10—Supports for artificial teeth for transport or for comparison of the colour
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
- A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
- A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
- A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
- A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/02—Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient
- A61B3/06—Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient for testing light sensitivity, e.g. adaptation; for testing colour vision
- A61B3/066—Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient for testing light sensitivity, e.g. adaptation; for testing colour vision for testing colour vision
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C5/00—Filling or capping teeth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Brandt et al. | In vivo study for tooth colour determination—visual versus digital | |
Gómez‐Polo et al. | Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE 2000 color difference formulas on gingival color space | |
Horn et al. | Sphere spectrophotometer versus human evaluation of tooth shade | |
Da Silva et al. | Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction | |
Inokoshi et al. | Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials | |
Poljak-Guberina et al. | Colour discrimination of dental professionals and colour deficient laypersons | |
Fürhauser et al. | Evaluation of soft tissue around single‐tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score | |
Davison et al. | Shade selection by color vision-defective dental personnel | |
Donahue et al. | Shade color discrimination by men and women | |
Rodrigues et al. | An evaluation of shade differences between natural anterior teeth in different age groups and gender using commercially available shade guides | |
Tsukiyama et al. | Comparison of the anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in Asian and white subjects | |
Wolfart et al. | Subjective and objective perception of upper incisors | |
Jaju et al. | Evaluating tooth color matching ability of dental students | |
Fava et al. | Single implant‐supported crowns in the aesthetic zone: patient satisfaction with aesthetic appearance compared with appraisals by laypeople and dentists | |
Mattoo et al. | Subjective differences between dentists and patients about relative quality of metal ceramic restorations placed in the esthetic zone | |
JPH09253102A (en) | Method of determining shape of tooth and color configuration of tooth | |
Bertl et al. | Are colored periodontal probes reliable to classify the gingival phenotype in terms of gingival thickness? | |
Paravina | Understanding color | |
Young Jr et al. | Assessing shade differences in acrylic resin denture and natural teeth | |
Dummer et al. | Factors influencing the caries experience of a group of children at the ages of 11–12 and 15–16 years: Results from an ongoing epidemiological survey | |
Aldegheishem et al. | Perception of dental appearance and aesthetic analysis among patients, laypersons and dentists | |
Sharma et al. | A study of relationship between skin color and tooth shade value in Population of Udaipur, Rajasthan | |
Kutkut et al. | Comparison of the accuracy and reliability of instrumental shade selection devices and visual shade selection: An in vitro study | |
Ciucchi et al. | Incisor inclination and perceived tooth colour changes | |
Burnett | Clinical rest and closest speech positions in the determination of occlusal vertical dimension |