[go: up one dir, main page]

Kemmerly, 1990 - Google Patents

Dynamic ground-effect measurements on the F-15 STOL and Maneuver Technology Demonstrator (S/MTD) configuration

Kemmerly, 1990

View PDF
Document ID
17879617886175796886
Author
Kemmerly G
Publication year

External Links

Snippet

A moving-model ground-effect testing method was used to study the influence of rate-of- descent on the aerodynamic characteristics for the F-15 STOL and Maneuver Technology Demonstrator (S/MTD) configuration for both the approach and roll-out phases of landing …
Continue reading at ntrs.nasa.gov (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64D—EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLYING SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENTS OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D27/00—Arrangement or mounting of power plant in aircraft; Aircraft characterised thereby
    • B64D27/02—Aircraft characterised by the type or position of power plant
    • B64D27/16—Aircraft characterised by the type or position of power plant of jet type
    • B64D27/18—Aircraft characterised by the type or position of power plant of jet type within or attached to wing
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/60—Efficient propulsion technologies
    • Y02T50/67—Relevant aircraft propulsion technologies
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64D—EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLYING SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENTS OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D27/00—Arrangement or mounting of power plant in aircraft; Aircraft characterised thereby
    • B64D27/26—Aircraft characterised by construction of power-plant mounting
    • B64D2027/262—Engine support arrangements or elements
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64F—GROUND OR AIRCRAFT-CARRIER-DECK INSTALLATIONS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH AIRCRAFT; DESIGNING, MANUFACTURING, ASSEMBLING, CLEANING, MAINTAINING OR REPAIRING AIRCRAFT, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; HANDLING, TRANSPORTING, TESTING OR INSPECTING AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B64F5/00—Designing, manufacturing, assembling, cleaning, maintaining or repairing aircraft, not otherwise provided for; Handling, transporting, testing or inspecting aircraft components, not otherwise provided for

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Rizzetta et al. Comparative numerical study of two turbulence models for airfoil static and dynamic stall
Reed III Aeroelasticity matters: Some reflections on two decades of testing in the NASA Langley transonic dynamics tunnel
Kemmerly Dynamic ground-effect measurements on the F-15 STOL and Maneuver Technology Demonstrator (S/MTD) configuration
Redd et al. Wind-Tunnel Investigation of a B-52 Model Flutter Suppression System
Duncan Jr The effects of step excrescences on swept-wing boundary-layer transition
Gingras Experimental investigation of a multi-aircraft formation
Ranaudo et al. Effects of horizontal tail ice on longitudinal aerodynamic derivatives
Bragg et al. Effect of a simulated ice accretion on the aerodynamics of a swept wing
DeMoss Drag measurements on an ellipsoidal body
Luber et al. The impact of dynamic loads on the design of military aircraft
Bensch et al. Planned ditching simulation of a transport airplane
Hanson Evaluation of an aeroelastic model technique for predicting airplane buffet loads
Zarovsky et al. Flight Investigation of a Roll-Stabilized Missile Configuration at Varying Angles of Attack at Mach Numbers Between 0.8 and 1.79
Paulson Jr et al. An assessment of ground effects determined by static and dynamic testing techniques
Abel Evaluation of a Technique for Determining Airplane Aileron Effectiveness and Roll Rate by Using an Aeroelastically Scaled Model
AMANN A comparison of a nonlinear flight dynamic simulation of an airship with flight test results
Geyer Jr et al. Validation and Application of a Transient Aeroelastic Analysis for Shipboard Engage/Disengage Operations.
Chanetz et al. Wind tunnels and other aerodynamic test facilities
Moes et al. Flight stability and control and performance results from the Linear Aerospike SR-71 Experiment (LASRE)
Reed III Correlation with flight of some aeroelastic model studies in the NASA Langley transonic dynamics tunnel
KEMMERLY A comparison of the ground effects measured with and without rate-of-descent modeling on the F-15 S/MTD configuration
Abdollahi Aerodynamic analysis and simulation of a twin-tail tilt-duct unmanned aerial vehicle
Hwang et al. Transonic buffet behavior of Northrop F-5A aircraft
Putman et al. Low speed testing techniques for V/STOL aircraft in the Princeton dynamic model track
Richwine et al. A test bed for flight research experiments