Dorr et al., 2017 - Google Patents
Evaluation of the precision of contrast sensitivity function assessment on a tablet deviceDorr et al., 2017
View HTML- Document ID
- 17291506740530717124
- Author
- Dorr M
- Lesmes L
- Elze T
- Wang H
- Lu Z
- Bex P
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Scientific Reports
External Links
Snippet
The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) relates the visibility of a spatial pattern to both its size and contrast, and is therefore a more comprehensive assessment of visual function than acuity, which only determines the smallest resolvable pattern size. Because of the additional …
- 230000035945 sensitivity 0 title abstract description 46
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/345—Medical expert systems, neural networks or other automated diagnosis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
- G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or demand forecasting
- G06Q30/0203—Market surveys or market polls
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02C—SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
- G02C7/00—Optical parts
- G02C7/02—Lenses; Lens systems; Methods of designing lenses
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Dorr et al. | Evaluation of the precision of contrast sensitivity function assessment on a tablet device | |
| Priscilla et al. | Time trends on the prevalence of myopia in India–A prediction model for 2050 | |
| Shah et al. | The association between vision impairment and social participation in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review | |
| Kupers et al. | Modeling visual performance differences ‘around’the visual field: A computational observer approach | |
| Anstice et al. | Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children | |
| JP2003075785A (en) | System for determining diopter of spectacles and contact lens and method for the same | |
| Senna et al. | Development of multisensory integration following prolonged early-onset visual deprivation | |
| Dakin et al. | Similar contrast sensitivity functions measured using psychophysics and optokinetic nystagmus | |
| Kingsnorth et al. | Mobile app Aston contrast sensitivity test | |
| González-Pérez et al. | Five levels of performance and two subscales identified in the computer-vision symptom scale (CVSS17) by Rasch, factor, and discriminant analysis | |
| Yan et al. | Efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in aging | |
| Eshraghi et al. | Measuring contrast sensitivity in specific areas of vision–a meaningful way to assess quality of life and ability to perform daily activities in glaucoma | |
| Chun et al. | Comparison of impact of monocular and integrated binocular visual fields on vision-related quality of life | |
| Skerswetat et al. | A new, adaptive, self-administered, and generalizable method used to measure visual acuity | |
| Fülep et al. | Simulation of visual acuity by personalizable neuro-physiological model of the human eye | |
| Whillans et al. | Trajectories of vision in older people: the role of age and social position | |
| Durteste et al. | The vertical position of visual information conditions spatial memory performance in healthy aging | |
| Watson et al. | Letter identification and the neural image classifier | |
| Kwak et al. | How the window of visibility varies around polar angle | |
| GB2640383A (en) | Subjective Refraction Exam System | |
| Ni et al. | Using the real-life vision test to assess the functional vision of age-related cataract patients | |
| Ilechie et al. | Self-refraction accuracy with adjustable spectacles among children in Ghana | |
| Csizek et al. | Artificial intelligence-based screening for amblyopia and its risk factors: comparison with four classic stereovision tests | |
| Kartha et al. | Self-reported visual ability Versus Task performance in individuals with Ultra-low Vision | |
| Zhao et al. | Psychophysical validation of a novel active learning approach for measuring the visual acuity behavioral function |