Antipin et al., 2018 - Google Patents
CAD/CAE-technologies application for assessment of passenger safety on railway transport in emergencyAntipin et al., 2018
View PDF- Document ID
- 16976741777511479511
- Author
- Antipin D
- Shorokhov S
- Bondarenko O
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
External Links
Snippet
A possibility of using current software products realizing CAD/CAE-technologies for the assessment of passenger safety in emergency cases on railway transport has been analyzed. On the basis of the developed solid computer model of an anthropometric dummy …
- 206010022114 Injury 0 abstract description 28
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Arbogast et al. | Comparison of kinematic responses of the head and spine for children and adults in low-speed frontal sled tests | |
| King | The biomechanics of impact injury | |
| Iwamoto et al. | Development and validation of the Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) version 5 containing multiple 1D muscles for estimating occupant motions with muscle activation during side impacts | |
| Haug et al. | Human models for crash and impact simulation | |
| van Hoof et al. | Improving pedestrian safety using numerical human models | |
| Liu et al. | Development of child pedestrian mathematical models and evaluation with accident reconstruction | |
| Antipin et al. | CAD/CAE-technologies application for assessment of passenger safety on railway transport in emergency | |
| Kimpara et al. | Development and validation of THUMS version 5 with 1D muscle models for active and passive automotive safety research | |
| Wang et al. | Prediction of long bone fractures via reconstruction of pedestrian accidents using multi-body system and FE models | |
| Yasuki et al. | Validation of kinematics and lower extremity injuries estimated by total human model for safety in SUV to pedestrian impact test | |
| Kallieris et al. | Comparison between frontal impact tests with cadavers and dummies in a simulated true car restrained environment | |
| Coley et al. | Pedestrian human body validation using detailed real-world accidents | |
| Huelke et al. | Cervical fractures and fracture-dislocations sustained without head impact | |
| Kobishchanov et al. | Use of anthropometric dummies of mathematical models in the safety and comfortableness analysis of a passenger rolling stock | |
| Ruan et al. | Impact response and biomechanical analysis of the knee-thigh-hip complex in frontal impacts with a full human body finite element model | |
| CN113643816B (en) | Six-year-old child passenger finite element model with 30-degree trunk angle national sign, and construction method and application thereof | |
| Shorokhov et al. | Prediction of injury to passengers of railway rolling stock based on modern physical simulation methods | |
| Yang | Review of mathematical human models for incorporation into vehicle safety design | |
| Kallieris et al. | Comparison of sled tests with real traffic accidents | |
| Cesari et al. | Comparison between in-the-field accidents and reconstructed accidents with dummies and with cadavers | |
| Huelke et al. | Anatomy, injury frequency, biomechanics, and human tolerances | |
| Hassan et al. | Nonlinear multibody dynamics and finite element modeling of occupant response: part I—rear vehicle collision | |
| Antipin et al. | The development of software for forecasting injuries caused to passengers of vehicles in emergency situations | |
| Snyder | Occupant impact injury tolerances for aircraft crashworthiness design | |
| Miller | Low velocity impact, vehicular damage and passenger injury |