[go: up one dir, main page]

Fétick et al., 2020 - Google Patents

Blind deconvolution in astronomy with adaptive optics: the parametric marginal approach

Fétick et al., 2020

View PDF
Document ID
15597651025630694442
Author
Fétick R
Mugnier L
Fusco T
Neichel B
Publication year
Publication venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

External Links

Snippet

One of the major limitations of using adaptive optics (AO) to correct image post-processing is the lack of knowledge about the system's point spread function (PSF). The PSF is not always available as direct imaging on isolated point-like objects, such as stars. The use of AO …
Continue reading at arxiv.org (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
    • G06T5/001—Image restoration
    • G06T5/003—Deblurring; Sharpening
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G02—OPTICS
    • G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS, OR APPARATUS
    • G02B27/00—Other optical systems; Other optical apparatus
    • G02B27/0025—Other optical systems; Other optical apparatus for optical correction, e.g. distorsion, aberration
    • G02B27/0068—Other optical systems; Other optical apparatus for optical correction, e.g. distorsion, aberration having means for controlling the degree of correction, e.g. using phase modulators, movable elements

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Fétick et al. Blind deconvolution in astronomy with adaptive optics: the parametric marginal approach
Weilbacher et al. The data processing pipeline for the MUSE instrument
van Holstein et al. Polarimetric imaging mode of vlt/sphere/irdis-ii. characterization and correction of instrumental polarization effects
Fétick et al. Physics-based model of the adaptive-optics-corrected point spread function-applications to the sphere/zimpol and muse instruments
Perera et al. An AzTEC 1.1 mm survey of the GOODS-N field–I. Maps, catalogue and source statistics
Fiete et al. Image quality of sparse-aperture designs for remote sensing
Tokovinin et al. Accurate seeing measurements with MASS and DIMM
Trippe et al. High-precision astrometry with MICADO at the European Extremely Large Telescope
Emsellem et al. Dynamical models of NGC 3115
Vigan et al. Photometric characterization of exoplanets using angular and spectral differential imaging
Canovas et al. Data-reduction techniques for high-contrast imaging polarimetry-applications to expo
Ireland Phase errors in diffraction-limited imaging: contrast limits for sparse aperture masking
Fritz et al. What is limiting near-infrared astrometry in the Galactic Centre?
Yeo et al. Point spread function of SDO/HMI and the effects of stray light correction on the apparent properties of solar surface phenomena
Schödel et al. Holographic imaging of crowded fields: high angular resolution imaging with excellent quality at very low cost
Iwamuro et al. FIBRE-pac: FMOS image-based reduction package
Kammerer et al. The near infrared imager and slitless spectrograph for JWST. V. Kernel phase imaging and data analysis
Berdeu et al. First observation of a quadruple asteroid-Detection of a third moon around (130) Elektra with SPHERE/IFS
Popowicz et al. Review of image quality measures for solar imaging
Beltramo-Martin et al. Review of PSF reconstruction methods and application to post-processing
Liaudat et al. Rethinking data-driven point spread function modeling with a differentiable optical model
Wagner et al. Point spread function reconstruction for single-conjugate adaptive optics on extremely large telescopes
Doelman et al. L-band integral field spectroscopy of the HR 8799 planetary system
Casetti-Dinescu et al. A comprehensive astrometric calibration of hst’s wfpc2. i. distortion mapping
Schlichenmaier et al. Effects of solar evolution on finite acquisition time of Fabry–Perot interferometers in high resolution solar physics