[go: up one dir, main page]

de Haas et al., 2010 - Google Patents

Comparison of simultaneous or delayed liver surgery for limited synchronous colorectal metastases

de Haas et al., 2010

View HTML
Document ID
14918570148466798577
Author
de Haas R
Adam R
Wicherts D
Azoulay D
Bismuth H
Vibert E
Salloum C
Perdigao F
Benkabbou A
Castaing D
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of British Surgery

External Links

Snippet

Background The optimal surgical strategy for patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to compare simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection with a delayed strategy in patients who had a limited …
Continue reading at www.academia.edu (HTML) (other versions)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
de Haas et al. Comparison of simultaneous or delayed liver surgery for limited synchronous colorectal metastases
Wicherts et al. Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal metastases
Finch et al. Effect of type of resection on outcome of hepatic resection for colorectal metastases
Weber et al. Simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumour and synchronous liver metastases
Bassi et al. High recurrence rate after atypical resection for pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma
Adam et al. Patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: is there a possibility of cure?
Jones et al. Effect of specialist decision-making on treatment strategies for colorectal liver metastases
Lo et al. Living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation for early irresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Benoist et al. Treatment strategy for patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous irresectable liver metastases
Elias et al. Extrahepatic disease does not contraindicate hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases
Van der Pool et al. Optimizing the outcome of surgery in patients with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases
Smyth et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Hayashi et al. Risk factors for complications after partial splenic embolization for liver cirrhosis
Yang et al. Impact of postoperative infective complications on long-term survival after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma
Neudecker et al. Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer
Van Vledder et al. Body composition and outcome in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases
McArdle et al. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer
Farges et al. Multicentre European study of preoperative biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
Peeters et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer
Aziz et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis
Bell et al. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence
Tamandl et al. Lymph node ratio after curative surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Capussotti et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for initially irresectable colorectal liver metastases
Li et al. Management of concomitant hepatic artery injury in patients with iatrogenic major bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Matsumoto et al. Role of anatomical right hepatic trisectionectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma