Elseedawy et al., 2014 - Google Patents
Pb. 44. do qualitative patterns of stiffness help differentiate benign from malignant breast masses of similar stiffness during shear wave elastography?Elseedawy et al., 2014
View PDF- Document ID
- 14785721358979063655
- Author
- Elseedawy M
- Whelehan P
- Vinnicombe S
- McLean D
- Thomson K
- Evans A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Breast Cancer Research
External Links
Snippet
Methods A total of 158 consecutive histologically confirmed benign lesions with a mean stiffness> 30 kPa were identified from a prospective database. Forty-nine cancers with the same distribution of stiffness as the benign lesions were identified for comparison. The …
- 230000003211 malignant 0 title abstract description 27
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
- G06F19/321—Management of medical image data, e.g. communication or archiving systems such as picture archiving and communication systems [PACS] or related medical protocols such as digital imaging and communications in medicine protocol [DICOM]; Editing of medical image data, e.g. adding diagnosis information
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0012—Biomedical image inspection
- G06T7/0014—Biomedical image inspection using an image reference approach
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/345—Medical expert systems, neural networks or other automated diagnosis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
- A61B8/08—Detecting organic movements or changes, e.g. tumours, cysts, swellings
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Geach et al. | PB. 15. An audit of our benign surgical biopsy rate in the prevalent round for the reporting year 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013 | |
Wasan et al. | Digital breast tomosynthesis improves the accuracy of the diagnosis of circumscribed lesions because of increase of margin visibility | |
Joyce et al. | PB. 30. Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy values as biomarkers for treatment response in breast cancer | |
Otsuka et al. | Local breast density at lesion sites in diagnostic and previous screening mammograms | |
Elseedawy et al. | Pb. 44. do qualitative patterns of stiffness help differentiate benign from malignant breast masses of similar stiffness during shear wave elastography? | |
Muscat et al. | PB. 17. Are patients who have had total body irradiation at similar risk of breast cancer to those having mantle radiotherapy? A review of the evidence and suggestions on breast imaging surveillance | |
Evans et al. | PB. 25. Implementation of two new digital mammography technologies for Breast Test Wales: more or less accurate? | |
Daniels et al. | PB. 24. How does volumetric breast density change with time? | |
Meyer et al. | PB. 22. Does mammographic compression force at breast screening influence the likelihood of subsequent screening attendance? | |
Sever et al. | PB. 16. Breast screening mammograms: recall or not to recall. What is the golden ratio? | |
Bonam et al. | PB. 36. Imaging in gynaecomastia: audit of referral and imaging practise to establish referral guidelines | |
Cox et al. | PB. 12. Audit and root-cause analysis of classification 2 and 3 interval cancers | |
Halim et al. | PB. 32. Type of breast surgery in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: role of DCE-MRI | |
Savaridas et al. | PB. 41. What is the incidence of internal mammary node lymphadenopathy on CT in primary breast cancer patients within 1 year of a diagnosis? | |
Hodkin et al. | PB. 6. Management of radial scars on core biopsy | |
Babu et al. | PB. 14. An analysis of subtle alterations in reading pattern with the introduction of digital mammography screening: South East Scotland Breast Screening Programme | |
Rajan et al. | PB. 26. MRI-guided breast biopsy in Leeds: 12 years' experience | |
Morgan et al. | Efficacy of second-time vacuum-assisted breast excision in the management of screen-detected high-risk breast lesions | |
Newlands et al. | PB. 38. Extent of agreement between radiological and pathological size and factors affecting completeness of excision in breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer | |
Teo et al. | Preoperative assessment of breast volume to aid surgical planning: comparison of software-based mammographic measurements with subsequent mastectomy volumes | |
Healy et al. | PB. 11. Modern management of acute breast abscesses: radiological interventions replacing surgical incisions? | |
Wotton et al. | PB. 42. Influences upon presentation to the symptomatic breast clinic: is there an increase in symptomatic referrals due to the physical presence of the breast screening van within an area? | |
Babu et al. | PB. 13. Impact on film reading of moving from analogue to digital screening: a service evaluation-South East Scotland Breast Screening Programme | |
Chen et al. | Are abnormalities missed in the PERFORMS self-assessment scheme due to visual or cognitive factors? | |
Bundred et al. | PB. 9. Randomised controlled trial of stereotactic 11G vacuum-assisted core biopsy for diagnosis and management of malignant microcalcification |