Kehila et al., 2017 - Google Patents
Seismic assessment of Algerian bridgeKehila et al., 2017
View PDF- Document ID
- 13847885497094357617
- Author
- Kehila F
- Remki M
- Kibboua A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Facing the Challenges in Structural Engineering, GeoMEast
External Links
Snippet
This study focused on the probabilistic risk assessment of reinforced concrete piers bridges subjected to ground motion excitation. In order to assess the vulnerability of Piers Bridge, a case study of a typical Algerian highway bridge is presented, illustrating the seismic …
- 238000004458 analytical method 0 abstract description 28
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04H—BUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
- E04H9/00—Buildings, or groups of buildings, or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake, extreme climate
- E04H9/02—Buildings, or groups of buildings, or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake, extreme climate withstanding earthquake or sinking of ground
- E04H9/028—Earthquake withstanding shelters
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04B—GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
- E04B1/00—Constructions in general; Structures which are not restricted either to walls, e.g. partitions, or floors or ceilings or roofs
- E04B1/62—Insulation or other protection; Elements or use of specified material therefor
- E04B1/92—Protection against other undesired influences or dangers
- E04B1/98—Protection against other undesired influences or dangers against vibrations or shocks; against mechanical destruction, e.g. by air-raids
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04H—BUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
- E04H9/00—Buildings, or groups of buildings, or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake, extreme climate
- E04H9/02—Buildings, or groups of buildings, or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake, extreme climate withstanding earthquake or sinking of ground
- E04H9/021—Bearing, supporting or connecting constructions specially adapted for such buildings
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Silwal et al. | Aftershock fragility assessment of steel moment frames with self-centering dampers | |
Furtado et al. | Simplified macro‐model for infill masonry walls considering the out‐of‐plane behaviour | |
Zafar et al. | Seismic behavior of SMA–FRP reinforced concrete frames under sequential seismic hazard | |
Ni Choine et al. | Nonlinear dynamic analysis and seismic fragility assessment of a corrosion damaged integral bridge | |
El-Betar | Seismic performance of existing RC framed buildings | |
Merter et al. | A comparative study on nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of RC frame structures | |
HARAN et al. | Reliability evaluation of RC frame by two major fragility analysis methods | |
Mahdavi et al. | Modelling and Comparison of Plastic Performance in Ten Types of New Steel Braces under Pushover Analysis | |
Emelyanov et al. | Details of large-panel buildings seismic analysis | |
Hamid et al. | Seismic assessment of a full-scale double-storey residential house using fragility curve | |
Kehila et al. | Seismic assessment of Algerian bridge | |
Billah et al. | Seismic fragility assessment of concrete bridge pier reinforced with Shape Memory Alloy considering residual displacement | |
Ghanem et al. | Seismic fragility assessment of skewed reinforced concrete bridges | |
Hariri-Ardebili | Concrete dams: from failure modes to seismic fragility | |
Günaydın et al. | Dynamic response of a reinforced concrete minaret | |
Fouad et al. | Seismic Assessment of Algerian Bridge | |
Kibboua et al. | Comparison between fragility curves of RC bridge piers designed by old and recent Algerian codes | |
Taib et al. | Axial load variations of irregular RC frames with setback under vertical earthquakes | |
Liang et al. | Analysis of time-varying seismic fragility of rigid frame pier of offshore bridge | |
Kehila et al. | Probabilistic and Seismic Damage Assessment of Algerian Bridges | |
Razi et al. | Seismic Fragility Assessment of Steel SMRF Structures under Various Types of Near and Far Fault Ground Motions | |
Sidi | Probabilistic Modeling of Seismic Risk Based Design for a Dual System Structure. | |
Deger et al. | Evaluation of Earthquake Input Energy Distribution in an RC Building for an Energy-Based Seismic Design Approach | |
Billah et al. | Comparative collapse performance assessment of bridge pier under near-fault and long duration ground motions | |
Kim et al. | Seismic fragility analysis in nuclear power plants—a case study of reinforced concrete squat walls |