Garvin et al., 2012 - Google Patents
Sexual dimorphism in skeletal browridge and chin morphologies determined using a new quantitative methodGarvin et al., 2012
View PDF- Document ID
- 12549390636079611
- Author
- Garvin H
- Ruff C
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- American journal of physical anthropology
External Links
Snippet
Qualitative methods of describing sexual dimorphism in discrete cranial traits have been criticized for their subjectivity and statistical limitations. However, researchers have yet to be able to accurately capture the morphology of these individual traits using traditional metric …
- 230000001568 sexual 0 title abstract description 24
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06K—RECOGNITION OF DATA; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K9/00—Methods or arrangements for reading or recognising printed or written characters or for recognising patterns, e.g. fingerprints
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0012—Biomedical image inspection
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Garvin et al. | Sexual dimorphism in skeletal browridge and chin morphologies determined using a new quantitative method | |
Kesterke et al. | Using the 3D Facial Norms Database to investigate craniofacial sexual dimorphism in healthy children, adolescents, and adults | |
Baab et al. | The shape of human evolution: a geometric morphometrics perspective | |
Boyer et al. | A new fully automated approach for aligning and comparing shapes | |
Shearer et al. | Sexual dimorphism in human browridge volume measured from 3D models of dry crania: a new digital morphometrics approach | |
O'HIGGINS | The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry | |
Abdel Fatah et al. | Improving sex estimation from crania using a novel three‐dimensional quantitative method | |
Xing et al. | Geometric morphometric analyses of orbit shape in Asian, African, and European human populations | |
Li et al. | Rapid automated landmarking for morphometric analysis of three‐dimensional facial scans | |
Kelley et al. | Population-inclusive assigned-sex-at-birth estimation from skull computed tomography scans | |
Düppe et al. | Evaluation of facial anthropometry using three-dimensional photogrammetry and direct measuring techniques | |
Stephan et al. | Facial soft tissue depths in craniofacial identification (part II): an analytical review of the published sub‐adult data | |
Dudzik et al. | Craniometric data analysis and estimation of biodistance | |
Seifert et al. | Applicability and limitations of sex assessment based on foramen magnum | |
Musilová et al. | Sex and ancestry related differences between two Central European populations determined using exocranial meshes | |
Bilfeld et al. | Ontogeny of size and shape sexual dimorphism in the pubis: a multislice computed tomography study by geometric morphometry | |
Guy et al. | Symphyseal shape variation in extant and fossil hominoids, and the symphysis of Australopithecus bahrelghazali | |
Bruner et al. | The skull from Florisbad: a paleoneurological report | |
Algee‐Hewitt et al. | The reality of virtual anthropology: comparing digitizer and laser scan data collection methods for the quantitative assessment of the cranium | |
Athreya | The frontal bone in the genus Homo: a survey of functional and phylogenetic sources of variation | |
Toneva et al. | A geometric morphometric study on sexual dimorphism in viscerocranium | |
Kaifu et al. | Homo erectus calvaria from Ngawi (Java) and its evolutionary implications | |
Petaros et al. | Sexual dimorphism in mastoid process volumes measured from 3D models of dry crania from medieval Croatia | |
Lamer et al. | Testing the cross-applicability of juvenile sex estimation from diaphyseal dimensions | |
von Koenigswald et al. | Pedal distal phalanges of the Eocene adapoids Europolemur and Darwinius compared to phalanges of Notharctus and other primates |