[go: up one dir, main page]

Pratten et al., 1996 - Google Patents

Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths

Pratten et al., 1996

Document ID
12404242045208977716
Author
Pratten D
McDonald N
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of endodontics

External Links

Snippet

The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of radiographic and electronic methods to determine reliably the location of the apical constriction. The working length of root canals in human cadaver teeth was determined by positioning an endodontic file at the apical …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
    • A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
    • A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/14—Applications or adaptations for dentistry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/0006—Impression trays
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
    • A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
    • A61K6/10—Compositions for taking dental impressions
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/582—Calibration
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C1/00—Dental machines for boring or cutting; General features of dental machines or apparatus, e.g. hand-piece design
    • A61C1/08—Machine parts specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C1/082—Positioning or guiding, e.g. of drills
    • A61C1/084—Positioning or guiding, e.g. of drills of implanting tools
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C5/00—Filling or capping teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C7/00—Orthodontics, i.e. obtaining or maintaining the desired position of teeth, e.g. by straightening, evening, regulating, separating, or by correcting malocclusions

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Pratten et al. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths
Dunlap et al. An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals
ElAyouti et al. The ability of root ZX apex locator to reduce the frequency of overestimated radiographic working length
ElAyouti et al. Frequency of overinstrumentation with an acceptable radiographic working length
Pommer et al. Influence of the canal contents on the electrical assisted determination of the length of root canals
Hoer et al. The accuracy of electronic working length determination
Kaufman et al. Reliability of different electronic apex locators to detect root perforations in vitro
Martínez‐Lozano et al. Methodological considerations in the determination of working length
Welk et al. An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators
McDonald et al. An evaluation of the apex locator Endocater
Mayeda et al. In vivo measurement accuracy in vital and necrotic canals with the Endex apex locator
Stein et al. The influence of the major and minor foramen diameters on apical electronic probe measurements
Mancini et al. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study
Trope et al. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator under controlled clinical conditions
Pishipati An in vitro comparison of Propex II apex locator to standard radiographic method
Bahrololoomi et al. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator for working length determination in primary anterior teeth
Kumar et al. Clinical evaluation of conventional radiography, radiovisiography, and an electronic apex locator in determining the working length in primary teeth
Arora et al. An in vivo evaluation of the ENDEX and RCM Mark II electronic apex locators in root canals with different contents
Suguro et al. The use of micro-computed tomography to determine the accuracy of electronic working length with two apex locators
Sahni et al. A comparative evaluation of efficacy of electronic apex locator, digital radiography, and conventional radiographic method for root canal working length determination in primary teeth: An in vitro study
Pallares et al. An in vivo comparative study of two apex locators
Saritha et al. The accuracy of two electronic apex locators on effect of preflaring and file size: An: in vitro: study
da Silva et al. Ex vivo accuracy of Root ZX II, Root ZX Mini and RomiApex A-15 apex locators in extracted vital pulp teeth
De-Deus et al. Micro-CT study of the in vivo accuracy of a wireless electronic apex locator
Koç et al. Accuracy of different electronic apex locators in determination of minimum Root perforation diameter