Sabrina et al., 2022 - Google Patents
Ensuring academic integrity in online assessments: a literature review and recommendationsSabrina et al., 2022
View PDF- Document ID
- 12290566035473794794
- Author
- Sabrina F
- Azad S
- Sohail S
- Thakur S
- Publication year
External Links
Snippet
During the recent COVID-19 outbreak, educational institutions have transitioned to online teaching for all students for most of the programs. Due to lack of in-person interactions and monitoring, assessments in online courses may be more susceptible to contract cheating …
- 238000011160 research 0 abstract description 39
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/06—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers
- G09B7/07—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers providing for individual presentation of questions to a plurality of student stations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
- G09B7/04—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student characterised by modifying the teaching programme in response to a wrong answer, e.g. repeating the question, supplying a further explanation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances
- G09B5/08—Electrically-operated educational appliances providing for individual presentation of information to a plurality of student stations
- G09B5/14—Electrically-operated educational appliances providing for individual presentation of information to a plurality of student stations with provision for individual teacher-student communication
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Sabrina et al. | Ensuring academic integrity in online assessments: a literature review and recommendations | |
| Okada et al. | Pedagogical approaches for e‐assessment with authentication and authorship verification in Higher Education | |
| Holden et al. | Academic integrity in online assessment: A research review | |
| Golden et al. | Addressing cheating when using test bank questions in online classes | |
| Okada et al. | e‐Authentication for online assessment: A mixed‐method study | |
| Ngqondi et al. | A secure online exams conceptual framework for South African universities | |
| Kocdar et al. | Cheating and plagiarism in e-assessment: Students' perspectives | |
| Gross et al. | What's skill got to do with it?: Information literacy skills and self‐views of ability among first‐year college students | |
| Murray et al. | Test candidates’ attitudes and their relationship to demographic and experiential variables: The case of overseas trained teachers in NSW, Australia | |
| Bylieva et al. | Academic dishonesty prevention in e-learning university system | |
| Shi et al. | Investigating teachers’ and students’ perceptions of online English learning in a maritime context in China | |
| Maheshi et al. | Dialogic feedback at scale: Recommendations for learning analytics design | |
| Roe et al. | Student perceptions of peer cheating behaviour during COVID-19 induced online teaching and assessment | |
| Haque et al. | Virtual assessment in English language teaching during COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and considerations in Bangladesh perspectives | |
| Maleki | Mindset matters more than you think: Investigating psychological reasons behind online exam cheating behaviors among EFL learners in higher education | |
| Keyser et al. | Clever Methods Students Use to Cheat and Ways to Neutralize Them. | |
| Judi | Integrity and security of digital assessment: Experiences in online learning | |
| Eastman et al. | Academic dishonesty: An exploratory study examining whether insurance students are different from other college students | |
| Guerrero-Roldán et al. | Students’ experiences on using an authentication and authorship checking system in e-assessment | |
| Tian et al. | From awareness to behavior: The empirical effects of real problem-oriented learning in civic and moral education | |
| Feinman | Alternative to proctoring in introductory statistics community college courses | |
| Ivanova et al. | eAssessment by using a Trustworthy System in Blended and Online Institutions | |
| Williams | The Use of Digital Applications and Website in Completing Math Assignments | |
| Shivshankar | Assessment Integrity and Assessment Security in the Digital Era | |
| Aheto et al. | Lived Experiences: Educators’ Perspectives in Assessment Within an Online Distance Education Nursing Programme |