[go: up one dir, main page]

Hoffman, 1958 - Google Patents

Free-flight Investigation at Mach Numbers from 0.8 to 1.5 of the Effect of a Fuselage Indentation on the Zero-lift Drag of a 52.5 Degree Sweptback-wing--body …

Hoffman, 1958

View PDF
Document ID
10321149169741130067
Author
Hoffman S
Publication year

External Links

Snippet

Two rocket-propelled models were flight-tested at Mach numbers from 0.8 to 1.5 to determine the effect of a fuselage indentation on the drag of a 52.50 sweptback-wing--body configuration with two large strut-mounted stores symmetrically located above and below the …
Continue reading at ntrs.nasa.gov (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/10—Drag reduction
    • Y02T50/16—Drag reduction by influencing airflow
    • Y02T50/162—Wing tip vortex reduction
    • Y02T50/164—Winglets
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C3/00—Wings
    • B64C3/10—Shape of wings
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/10—Drag reduction
    • Y02T50/16—Drag reduction by influencing airflow
    • Y02T50/166—Drag reduction by influencing airflow by influencing the boundary layer
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C23/00—Influencing air-flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for
    • B64C23/06—Influencing air-flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for by generating vortices
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64D—EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLYING SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENTS OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D27/00—Arrangement or mounting of power plant in aircraft; Aircraft characterised thereby
    • B64D27/02—Aircraft characterised by the type or position of power plant
    • B64D27/16—Aircraft characterised by the type or position of power plant of jet type
    • B64D27/18—Aircraft characterised by the type or position of power plant of jet type within or attached to wing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C3/00—Wings
    • B64C3/38—Adjustment of complete wings or parts thereof
    • B64C3/44—Varying camber
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C39/00—Aircraft not otherwise provided for
    • B64C39/10—All-wing aircraft
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C9/00—Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64D—EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLYING SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENTS OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D1/00—Dropping, ejecting, releasing, or receiving articles, liquids, or the like, in flight
    • B64D1/02—Dropping, ejecting, or releasing articles

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Englar et al. STOE potential of the circulation control wing for high-performance aircraft
Blake et al. UAV aerial refueling-wind tunnel results and comparison with analytical predictions
Alford et al. An Exploratory Investigation of the Low-Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics of Variable-Wing-Sweep Airplane Configurations
US3392936A (en) Leading edge curvature based on convective heating
Hoffman Free-flight Investigation at Mach Numbers from 0.8 to 1.5 of the Effect of a Fuselage Indentation on the Zero-lift Drag of a 52.5 Degree Sweptback-wing--body Configuration with Symmetrically Mounted Stores on the Fuselage
Pepper Jr et al. Comparison of Zero-lift Drags Determined by Flight Tests at Transonic Speeds of Symmetrically Mounted Nacelles in Various Spanwise Positions on a 45 Degrees Sweptback Wing and Body Combination
Bielat et al. The Transonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of Two Variable-Sweep Airplane Configurations Capable of Low-Level Supersonic Attack
Hoffman A Flight Investigation of the Transonic Area Rule for a 52.5© Sweptback Wind-body Configuration at Mach Numbers Between 0.8 and 1.6
Hoffman Zero-lift Drag of a Large Fuselage Cavity and a Partially Submerged Store on a 52.5 Degree Sweptback-wing-Body Configuration as Determined from Free-flight Tests at Mach Numbers of 0.7 to 1.53
Smith Exploratory Investigation of External Stores on the Aerodynamic Characteristics of a 1/16-Scale Model of the Douglas D-558-II Research Airplane at a Mach Number of 2.01
Hoq et al. Effect of External Store on a Generic Subsonic Fighter Aircraft
Spearman Investigation of the Aerodynamic Characteristics in Pitch and Sideslip of a 45© Swept-wing Airplane Configuration with Various Vertical Locations of the Wing and Horizontal Tail: Static Lateral and Directional Stability; Mach Numbers of 1.41 and 2.01
Hoffman et al. Transonic Flight Tests To Compare the Zero-Lift Drags of 450 Sweptback Wings of Aspect Ratio 3.55 and 6.0 With and Without Nacelles at the Wing Tips
Hoffman Free-flight investigation of the drag of a 60 deg delta-wing configuration with large stores mounted below the indented fuselage at mach numbers between 0.8 and 1.6
Robinson et al. Stability and Control Characteristics at a Mach Number of 1.41 of a Variable-sweep Airplane Configuration Capable of Low-level Supersonic Attack-outer Wing Swept 75° and 108°
Bellman A Summary of Flight-Determined Transonic Lift and Drag Characteristics of Several Research Airplane Configurations
Falarski et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of a large-scale, twin tilt-nacelle V/STOL model
Ulmann et al. Some Effects of Fin Plan Form on the Static Stability of Fin-Body Combinations at Mach Number 4.06
Malvestuto Jr Method of Estimating the Minimum Size of a Tail or Wing-Tip Parachute for Emergency Spin Recovery of an Airplane
English Free-Flight Investigation, Including Some Effects of Wing Aeroelasticity, of the Rolling Effectiveness of an All-Movable Horizontal Tail With Differential Incidence at Mach Numbers From 0.6 to 1.5
Nelson Large-scale Flight Measurements of Zero-lift Drag at Mach Numbers Form 0.86 to 1.5 of a Wing-body Combination Having a 60 Degree Triangular Wing with NACA 65A003 Sections
Pepper et al. Transonic Flight Tests to Determine the Effect of Thickness Ratio and Plan-form Modification on the Zero-lift Drag of a 45© Sweptback Wing
Winston et al. Propeller Slipstream Effects as Determined from Wing Pressure Distribution on a Large-scale Six-propeller VTOL Model at Static Thrust: Matthew M. Winston and Robert J. Huston
Hoffman et al. Transonic Flight Tests to Compare the Zero-lift Drags of 45 Degree Sweptback Wings of Aspect Ratio 3.55 and 6.0 with and Without Nacelles at the Wing Tips
Pepper Jr et al. Transonic Flight Tests to Determine the Effect of Thickness Ratio and Plan-form Modification on the Zero-lift Drag of a 45 Degree Sweptback Wing