[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2013050837A1 - Système et procédé pour fournir à des utilisateurs une commande de flux d'informations - Google Patents

Système et procédé pour fournir à des utilisateurs une commande de flux d'informations Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013050837A1
WO2013050837A1 PCT/IB2012/000916 IB2012000916W WO2013050837A1 WO 2013050837 A1 WO2013050837 A1 WO 2013050837A1 IB 2012000916 W IB2012000916 W IB 2012000916W WO 2013050837 A1 WO2013050837 A1 WO 2013050837A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
participant
transmission
source
tokens
value
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2012/000916
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Clyde HULL
Original Assignee
Quojax Corp.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Quojax Corp. filed Critical Quojax Corp.
Publication of WO2013050837A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013050837A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/10—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to communications, information networks, and information management including, but not limited to, computer networks; voice transmission networks; video, image, and music networks; news and other content management; and database management. More specifically, this disclosure relates to providing users with an efficient method of filtering and controlling the flow of data, information, and other items.
  • the disclosed system gives participants control of the flow of information to them and from them within a network.
  • the participant is able to turn on, speed up, slow or stop inflows of information.
  • the participant is able to control outgoing information.
  • Tokens from a real-time finite supply accompany all informational transactions. Participants adjust the token value of exchanges to accelerate or decelerate various flows of information. Tokens may be exchanged for other items of value to reduce the total available supply of tokens.
  • Another benefit to the participants is that those who contribute value to the system are rewarded. This directly benefits each participant who contributes value, but the less obvious indirect benefit to participants is that the system filters rewards to those whose contributions are of the greatest value to the participants. This reduces lower-value contributions and increases higher- value contributions, such that the value of the overall system to the individual participants is inclined to increase over time.
  • a computer is confi gured to receive incoming flows of data, information, and other items for each participant, as well as to manage outgoing flows of the same, again for each participant. Participants are able to regulate where their information, data, and other items go, with these regulations being followed by the computer. Participants are also able to regulate incoming inform ation, data, and other items, these regulations also being followed by the computer. While participants can change these regulations in real time, they are at any given point stable enough to be followed to the letter by the computer. Users of this system are thus able to control both outgoing and incoming flows of information, data, or other items.
  • FIG. l a is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the disclosed system allowing participants to control flows of information
  • FIG- l b is a detail schematic diagram of a participant controlling incoming flows of information or other transmissions
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing quasi-reciprocal flows between participants;
  • FIG. 3a is a detail schematic diagram of how passive transmissions are created;
  • FIG. 3b is a detail schematic diagram of such a passive transm ission being received (or not received) by potential recipients;
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing the effects of being a high-value participant vs, being a low-value participant within the system of the present disclosure
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing the effects of being a high-value participant vs. being a low-value participant known systems
  • FIG. 6a is a schematic diagram showing automated ownership transfer
  • FIG. 6b is a schematic diagram showing the effects of being an active participant vs. being an inactive participant in one embodiment.
  • FIG. 6c is a schematic diagram showing the effects of being an active participant vs. being an inactive participant in another embodiment.
  • Ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to "about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent "about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.
  • FIG. l a is a schematic diagram illustrating the system in one embodiment allowing participants to control flows of information.
  • the participant is able to classify different sources of information into high-value, medium value, low-value, and unwanted.
  • the participant is able to slow low-value information and encourage high-value information.
  • Low-value information may be essentially worthless, but if accompanied by sufficient tokens the transaction becomes worthwhile.
  • High-value inform ation could be accompanied by few, none-or even a negative number of tokens, but be worthwhile because of the information contained.
  • FIG. l b is a detail schematic of a participant controlling incoming flows of information or other transmissions.
  • FIG. 2 represents quasi-reciprocal flows between participants. Participants 1 and 2 are able to adjust the token rates they charge one another at will, encouraging or discouraging the flow of information between them. This does not involve any third party's judgm ent or decision-making. Tokens may be drained into the token pool with each transaction, and tokens may be acquired from the token pool by participants, typically at some cost. That the supply of tokens available to each participant is finite and that tokens can be applied usefully contribute to making tokens valuable enough to participants to offset, in sufficient quantity, the receipt of low-value or worthless information.
  • FIG. 3a is a detail schematic of how passive transmissions are created
  • FIG. 3b is a detail schematic of such a passive transm ission being actuated, or received (or not received) by potential recipients.
  • Passive transmissions e.g., a blog post
  • active transmission e.g., email
  • the creator is able to set the desired rate (positive, null, or negative) and potential recipients are able to choose whether to accept the exchange at this rate.
  • this disclosure can be applied to passive and active transmission of information, and to any other mode, such as a combination of active and passive, as well.
  • FIG. 4 shows the effects of being a high- value participant vs. being a low-value participant within the system of this disclosure.
  • FIG. 5 shows the effects of being a high-value participant vs. being a low-value participant in a current state-of-the-art system.
  • FIG. 6a illustrates how the ownership option works.
  • the system encourages participants to remain active and rewards the most active participants with greater ownership and control of the system in which they participate.
  • the rate at which activity accumulates new ownership can be adjusted according to the value or type of the activity, so as to encourage high-value activity or activities of particular sorts.
  • the rate can also be tied strictly to the level of activity.
  • FIG. 6b and FIG. 6c illustrate the differences and similarities between the ownership option with or without the expiration or reabsorption of old ownership. As old ownership decreases, proportionally speaking, either way, the rewards and penalties are similar, but more powerful if the old ownership is removed from the system. Active participation yields an increase in ownership. Greater activity than others leads to a
  • FIG. 6a, FIG. 6b, and FIG. 6c may be applied equally well to ownership of the system, to ownership of a subsystem of the system, or to some other ownable thing or commodity.
  • An ownership option can be deployed with some, all, or none of the system . This involves distributing tokens to participants which allow high-value participants in the system to accumulate greater control over the system or parts of the system, to accumulate ownership of the system itself or parts of the system, or both.
  • This ownership option can use the above token system, or it may be done separately. Typically, if done in conjunction with the above token system, it will be based on a second type of token in the same system . This is not necessary, however: one token could be used for both purposes.
  • the ownership option of the system involves the gradual transmission of ownership to participants. As participants make use of the system, they earn tokens which can be exchanged for fractions of ownership of the system itself or of some part of the system. This ownership may be time-bound, expiring a certain period of time after it is issued. It may be limited in terms of how many times it may cast votes on issues before expiring. It may be limited in any other reasonable way. While ownership may be of the non-expiring sort traditional at most corporations, this is expected to yield suboptimal results. Expiration of ownership may take the form of the system buying the ownership according to a
  • the utility of this aspect of this disclosure is to encourage and reward active participation in the system.
  • Current state of the art systems typically suffer from the "tragedy of the commons" problem, mitigated to a greater or lesser extent by the activities of the organization which owns it.
  • the participants in such systems do not have an actual financial stake in the well-being and success of the organization.
  • By gradually giving them ownership as they contribute the system benefits by gaining owners whose stake in the organization is directly proportional to their own contributions.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un système pour fournir à des participants une commande de flux d'informations transmis vers eux ou émis par eux dans un réseau. Le participant est capable de démarrer, d'accélérer, de ralentir ou d'interrompre des flux d'informations entrants. Le participant est également capable d'exercer un contrôle sur des informations sortantes. Des jetons provenant d'une offre limitée en temps réel accompagnent toutes les transactions importantes. Des participants ajustent la valeur de jeton d'échanges pour accélérer ou ralentir divers flux d'informations. Des jetons sont majoritairement ou entièrement possédés par des participants ou leurs agents plutôt que par le système ou son propriétaire. Des jetons peuvent être échangés pour d'autres articles de valeur pour réduire l'offre totale disponible de jetons. Dépendant de la configuration du système, des jetons peuvent être échangés pour la propriété du système lui-même.
PCT/IB2012/000916 2011-05-06 2012-05-10 Système et procédé pour fournir à des utilisateurs une commande de flux d'informations WO2013050837A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161483163P 2011-05-06 2011-05-06
US61/483,163 2011-05-06

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013050837A1 true WO2013050837A1 (fr) 2013-04-11

Family

ID=48043222

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2012/000916 WO2013050837A1 (fr) 2011-05-06 2012-05-10 Système et procédé pour fournir à des utilisateurs une commande de flux d'informations

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2013050837A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11669627B1 (en) 2020-10-13 2023-06-06 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. System for data access token management

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060148446A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2006-07-06 Stefan Karlsson Method and distributed rating system for determining rating data in a charging system
US7558832B2 (en) * 2003-03-03 2009-07-07 Microsoft Corporation Feedback loop for spam prevention
US20090296582A1 (en) * 2007-04-13 2009-12-03 Zhiqiang Shi Token-based congestion control method for the internet
US20100005093A1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2010-01-07 Michael Carl Heumann Knowledge filter

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100005093A1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2010-01-07 Michael Carl Heumann Knowledge filter
US20060148446A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2006-07-06 Stefan Karlsson Method and distributed rating system for determining rating data in a charging system
US7558832B2 (en) * 2003-03-03 2009-07-07 Microsoft Corporation Feedback loop for spam prevention
US20090296582A1 (en) * 2007-04-13 2009-12-03 Zhiqiang Shi Token-based congestion control method for the internet

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11669627B1 (en) 2020-10-13 2023-06-06 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. System for data access token management
US12135812B2 (en) 2020-10-13 2024-11-05 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. System for data access token management

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Haddon Information and communication technologies in everyday life: A concise introduction and research guide
Edosomwan et al. The history of social media and its impact on business
Whitworth et al. Spam and the social-technical gap
US20040024639A1 (en) Direct marketing management on behalf of subscribers and marketers
Ayres et al. Marketing privacy
Junk Synergies in lobbying? Conceptualising and measuring lobbying coalitions to study interest group strategies, access, and influence
Hock et al. Invitation phone calls increase attendance at civic meetings: Evidence from a field experiment
Loder et al. An economic response to unsolicited communication
Watts “Running on Empty”: Australia’s Neoliberal Social Security System, 1988–2015
CN102624536A (zh) 一种网络会议的来宾邀请方法及系统
Ajija et al. Impact of joining rotating savings and credit association (Rosca) on household assets in Indonesia
Ingram et al. Crowdfunding among IT entrepreneurs in Sweden: a qualitative study of the funding ecosystem and ICT entrepreneurs’ adoption of crowdfunding
WO2013050837A1 (fr) Système et procédé pour fournir à des utilisateurs une commande de flux d'informations
US20130290451A1 (en) Method and system for limiting unwanted on-line communication
CN110727877B (zh) 适用于社交软件的群组运行方法及系统
Guda et al. Strategic pricing and forecast communication on on-demand service platforms
Heripracoyo et al. Implementation of tourism business web
Mattisson et al. Co‐owned Local Government Organisations: Conditions for Strategy Development
Reeves et al. A marketplace for attention: Responses to a synthetic currency used to signal information importance in e-mail
Zimmer Social media use in local public agencies: a study of California's cities
Phirinyane Technology and the Nature of Active Citizenship: The Case of Botswana
Robin et al. Encouraging information disclosure on social media platforms in consumer marketing research
Ling et al. Risk information and markdowns-induced incentives to participate in hotel room resale schemes
Furler et al. An international society and journal for equity in health: 10 years on
Garg et al. Peer influence and information diffusion in online networks: An empirical analysis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12837721

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12837721

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1