[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2012069965A1 - Interactive deformation map corrections - Google Patents

Interactive deformation map corrections Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012069965A1
WO2012069965A1 PCT/IB2011/055145 IB2011055145W WO2012069965A1 WO 2012069965 A1 WO2012069965 A1 WO 2012069965A1 IB 2011055145 W IB2011055145 W IB 2011055145W WO 2012069965 A1 WO2012069965 A1 WO 2012069965A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
planning
planning image
locations
ooi
image set
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2011/055145
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Karl Antonin Bzdusek
Stephane Allaire
Nicholas Gordon Lance Hardcastle
Wolfgang Axel Tome
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
University Of Wisconsin
University Health Network
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., University Of Wisconsin, University Health Network filed Critical Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Publication of WO2012069965A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012069965A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N5/00Radiation therapy
    • A61N5/10X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
    • A61N5/103Treatment planning systems
    • A61N5/1031Treatment planning systems using a specific method of dose optimization
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N5/00Radiation therapy
    • A61N5/10X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
    • A61N5/103Treatment planning systems
    • A61N5/1038Treatment planning systems taking into account previously administered plans applied to the same patient, i.e. adaptive radiotherapy

Definitions

  • the following relates to the medical diagnostic imaging arts, radiation therapy arts, medical arts, radiation therapy planning arts, image processing arts, and related arts.
  • diagnostic images are taken from time to time to monitor progress of a treatment regimen, advancement of a medical condition, or plan a treatment course.
  • diagnostic image For example, in radiation therapy, using information from diagnostic image as a guide, spatially targeted dosages of ionizing radiation are applied to a tumor or other region containing cancerous or malignant tissue.
  • the applied radiation preferentially kills cancerous or malignant tissue. Because ionizing radiation is harmful to both malignant and healthy cells, precise spatial targeting of the radiation is important for applying effective radiation therapy to the malignancy while limiting collateral damage to healthy tissue.
  • the radiation beam is applied at angular positions around the subject in a manner that combines to produce a targeted total radiation dosage spatial distribution that is concentrated on the tumor or other region to be treated, while keeping the integrated exposure of certain radiation-sensitive critical organs below a safety threshold.
  • Angular coverage can be achieved by using a plurality of stationary radiation sources distributed around the subject, or by rotating a single radiation source such as a linear accelerator (LINAC) around the subject.
  • the radiation therapy is planned in advance for a specific subject, based on imaging data acquired of that subject.
  • CT computed tomography
  • MR magnetic resonance
  • PET positron emission tomography
  • SPECT single photon emission CT
  • ultrasound ultrasound
  • MR magnetic resonance
  • SPECT single photon emission CT
  • Radiation plan parameters are provided by the oncologist or other medical personnel.
  • the radiation therapy plan parameters typically include a minimum or target dose to be delivered to the malignant tumor, and maximum permissible dosages for the risk organs or regions.
  • contoured targets and organs at risk together with the radiation therapy plan parameters and known information about radiation attenuation or absorption characteristics of the various tissues serve as inputs to optimize the radiation beam spatial profile and intensities to concentrate the radiation in the target while limiting exposure of risk organs in a deformation map.
  • Deformable image registration is mapping of individual volume elements from one image to another image using non-rigid translation and/or rotations. That is, each volume element of the image is mapped separately.
  • Deformable image registration is required when anatomical differences exist between images that are beyond rigid translation/rotation.
  • Some applications of deformable image registration include propagation of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs) such as contours or Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and landmarks or Point(s) of Interest (POIs), deforming PET/CT studies to a CT acquired for treatment planning for contouring and evaluation, and/or accumulation of dose computed on multiple image sets of the same patient.
  • OOIs Object(s) of Interest
  • ROIs contours or Region(s) of Interest
  • POIs Point(s) of Interest
  • Deformable image registration can be used for cases such as, but not limited to, adaptive planning for a patient during the course of therapy, 4-D planning/optimization, composite planning, and multimodality treatment plan generation.
  • a radiation planning module is configured to update a first radiation therapy plan (RTP) generated with a first planning image set that has been segmented to define locations of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs), including contours delineating Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or landmarks indicating Point(s) of Interest (POIs).
  • RTP radiation therapy plan
  • the planning module receives a second planning image from an imaging device and registers the first and second planning images and generates a first transform deformation map which transforms one of the planning image sets into alignment with the other.
  • the OOI locations are operated on with the deformation map to propagate the 001 locations onto the second planning image set.
  • the deformation map is corrected in accordance with deviations between the propagated OOI locations and locations of the corresponding OOIs in the second planning image set.
  • the first radiation therapy plan is replicated and the replication adjusted with the corrected deformation map to generate an updated radiation therapy plan for the second planning image set.
  • a method of updating a first radiation therapy plan generated from a first planning image set that has been segmented to define locations of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs), including contours delineating Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or landmarks indicating Point(s) of Interest (POIs) is provided.
  • a second planning image set is received and the first and second planning image sets are registered with a computer-implemented algorithm to generate a first deformation map which transforms one of the planning image sets into alignment with the other.
  • the deformation map operates on the object of interest locations to propagate the object of interest locations onto the second planning image set.
  • the deformation map is corrected in accordance with a deviation between the propagated OOIs and locations of the
  • the first radiation therapy plan is replicated and the replication adjusted with the corrected deformation map to generate an updated radiation therapy plan for the second planning image set.
  • a radiation planning module is configured to contain a first planning image that has been segmented to define locations of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs), including contours delineating Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or landmarks indicating Point(s) of Interest (POIs).
  • the planning module receives an image pair where both images are in the same coordinate frame.
  • the planning module registers the first planning image with one of the images from the image pair and generates a first transform deformation map that transforms the planning image set into alignment with the other images.
  • the OOI locations are operated on with the deformation map to propagate the OOI locations onto the second planning image set.
  • the deformation map is corrected in accordance with deviations between the propagated OOI locations and locations of the corresponding OOIs in the second planning image set. Both images in the image pair are operated on with the deformation map to generate deformed images such that all three images are in the same coordinate frame.
  • One advantage resides in providing a deformation map for a treatment plan with less deformation errors.
  • Another advantage resides in providing more accurate mapping for treatment dose planning and tracking.
  • Another advantage resides in providing a radiologist or other medical professional to generate an improved deformation map.
  • Another advantage resides in providing a radiologist or other medical professional to generate an improved deformed image for contouring and analysis.
  • FIGURE 1 diagrammatically shows a radiation therapy system including a radiation therapy planning module
  • FIGURE 2 diagrammatically shows a radiation therapy planning method suitably performed by the radiation therapy planning module of the system of FIGURE 1;
  • FIGURES 3 and 4 diagrammatically show a region that diagrammatically illustrates selected operations of the method of FIGURE 2.
  • a radiation therapy system includes an imaging modality 10 suitable for acquiring planning images for planning radiation therapy.
  • the imaging modality 10 is a computed tomography (CT) scanner.
  • CT computed tomography
  • the CT scanner has a large patient aperture, 85 cm for example, which is large enough to accommodate the patient arranged in typical radiation therapy positions.
  • Other CT scanners can be used instead, as well as other imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance (MR), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and so forth.
  • PET positron emission tomography
  • MR magnetic resonance
  • SPECT single photon emission computed tomography
  • Acquired images are stored in an image memory 12, which may be in a central electronic records storage system.
  • the planning image is typically acquired of the subject scheduled to undergo the radiation therapy.
  • the subject may be an oncology patient, or a veterinary subject, or the like.
  • planning image in this context relates to the images that are used to plan radiation therapy sessions.
  • the planning images (or set of planning images), for example, generated at two different times, are used in generating deformation maps, which describe the deformations that transform or deform the planning image generated at one time into a common coordinate system and registered with the planning image taken at a different time.
  • Modeling anatomical shape change as deformation uses landmarks, features, surfaces, and the like in 3-D to define a mapping (transformation) between two images or sets of images (e.g., of the same anatomy) into the same coordinate frame or frame of reference.
  • Various algorithms are available for performing these mappings or transformations among sets of images. Once landmark and/or features and/or surfaces are identified and paired between the images, these points are used to compute a coordinate transformation that maps every coordinate location in one image to a corresponding location in the other image and align them accordingly into one coordinate system, which is called image registration.
  • a planning module 20 receives planning images at various times during a radiation therapy process.
  • the module 20 updates an earlier radiation therapy plan (RTP) and its cumulative dose map to compensate for anatomical changes, e.g., shrinking, expanding, shifting, etc, during prior therapy sessions.
  • RTP radiation therapy plan
  • a first planning image is generated and a first RTP is generated. After one or a series of therapy sessions, a subsequent planning image is generated and the module 20 updates the RTP.
  • the planning module 20 includes automatic segmentation tools 22 and manual segmentation and editing tools 24.
  • Model based segmentation or other methods are used to modify a representation of the ROI boundaries, such as by contours, binary mask, or mesh vertices therein and/or the POI positions.
  • the segmentation tools are used to delineate, e.g., with superimposed contours and/or dots, target Object(s) of Interest (OOIs) including Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or Point(s) of Interest (POIs) and other adjoining ROIs, OOIs, and/or POIs particularly at risk regions in which radiation dose is to be limited.
  • OOIs target Object(s) of Interest
  • ROIs Region(s) of Interest
  • POIs Point(s) of Interest
  • the manual segmentation tools include editing tools, which allow the user to manually adjust image features, particularly the segmentation contours and/or the landmark positions when the images are displayed on a display 26.
  • Manual inputs 28, such as a keyboard or mouse, enable the user to use various virtual tools to push or pull the OOIs to change their shapes and positions to conform more accurately to the image content.
  • the radiation target region may be a cancerous tumor
  • the one or more risk regions may include neighboring vital organs or tissue whose radiation exposure should be kept below a maximum value.
  • the radiation therapy planning is responsive to dose plan parameters that are indicative of dosage or dosage constraints for the radiation target region and the one or more risk regions.
  • An accumulated dose map is generated which shows the cumulative radiation dose which the treatment plan delivers to each region.
  • the planning module 20 also includes a deformable or elastic registration module which can implement one or more deformable, elastic registration algorithms 30.
  • deformable registration algorithms compare two images of a common area of the same subject to determine the differences between them and generate a transform, such as a deformation map, which can be applied to one of the images to transform it into alignment or registration with the other.
  • transform such as a deformation map
  • One of the ways to determine the accuracy of the mapping is to analyze the propagated OOI locations.
  • the editing tool module 24 is utilized to adjust contour points and/or features on the OOI locations propagated onto the second image.
  • the specialist can adjust the OOI locations manually using contour or mesh editing, for example.
  • the same or a different algorithm of the deformation image registration algorithm module 30 is then used to generate a new or corrected deformation map based on corresponding points of the locations of the original or first planning image set and the edited locations on the second image.
  • the planning module 20 also includes a radiation therapy planning module or algorithm 32 which can generate an initial RTP and update the RTP including the accumulated dose each time a subsequent planning image is generated.
  • a radiation therapy planning module or algorithm 32 can generate an initial RTP and update the RTP including the accumulated dose each time a subsequent planning image is generated.
  • the corrected deformation map is applied to the subsequent plan to conform the OOIs and their dose to the planning image for a second treatment session. In this manner, the accumulated radiation in each OOI is accurately determined over a plurality of treatment sessions even as OOIs shift, shrink, expand, change shape, or the like.
  • a deformable image registration can be used, for example, when a radiologist compares images acquired before and after administration of a contrast enhancing pharmaceutical that highlights malignant masses. If a tumor was shrunk by the therapy, the tumor is smaller and the surrounding OOIs have relaxed back closer to their normal location. Comparison of images before and after an intervention, such as radiation therapy, is performed. A simple change in position can cause apparent deformation of a breast, for example, which further complicates the comparison. Matching or image mapping is therefore performed to eliminate the deformation. The differences remaining between the original 3-D images and the non-ideally corrected images can be determined by subtracting the two images and taking an absolute value of the result.
  • a control processor 34 controls the modules and algorithms to perform the method described in conjunction with FIGURE 2.
  • the radiation therapy plan generated by the radiation therapy planning module 20 after adjustment of any propagated OOIs is stored in a radiation therapy plan memory 50.
  • a radiation therapy apparatus 52 is employed to deliver therapeutic radiation to the subject controlled by a radiation therapy control system 54 in accordance with the radiation therapy plan stored in the memory 50.
  • the radiation therapy delivery apparatus 52 is a tomotherapy linear accelerator (LINAC), and the radiation therapy control system 54 operates multi-leaf collimator (MLC) or other radiation beam profile-shaping apparatus of the LINAC 52 to modulate beam intensity and profile as the linear accelerator is moved around the subject, so as to deliver a radiation dose distribution into the subject that provides the desired integrated radiation dosage to the target feature while suitably limiting or constraining radiation exposure of sensitive critical features in accordance with the radiation therapy plan.
  • LINAC tomotherapy linear accelerator
  • MLC multi-leaf collimator
  • the radiation therapy planning module 20 can be embodied by a single digital processor, two or more digital processors, computers, application-specific integrated circuitry (ASIC), or so forth.
  • the radiation therapy planning including editing tools for generating deformation maps may be embodied by a storage medium storing instructions executable by a digital processor to perform the planning.
  • the storage medium may be a hard disk or other magnetic storage medium, an optical disk or other optical storage medium, a random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), FLASH memory, or other electronic storage medium, various combinations thereof, or so forth.
  • a first planning image is generated and/or displayed.
  • the initial first planning image is segmented 62 to define initial segmentation contours of the target and other OOIs.
  • the operation 62 can employ initial contouring utilizing automatic segmentation of the planning image, a semi-automatic segmentation, or manual segmentation of the OOIs.
  • a radiation therapy planning (RTP) operation is calculated 63.
  • the radiation therapy plan is generated using commercially available software. In other embodiments, the RTP plan is generated semi-automatically or manually.
  • any image segmentation operation 62 and RTP operation 63 can be performed using the radiation therapy planning module 20.
  • the initial radiation therapy plan is implemented to treat the patient.
  • the LINAC 52 is used to irradiate the patient over one or a series of therapy sessions.
  • a second planning image or image set is generated at an operation 64.
  • the first and second sets of planning images e.g. 1st and 2nd 3-D images
  • a deformation algorithm to determine a transform, usually a deformation map 66, which brings the first and second planning image sets into registration or alignment.
  • a deformation algorithm to determine a transform, usually a deformation map 66, which brings the first and second planning image sets into registration or alignment.
  • a deformation algorithm for example, a constant volume, 3-D, second order Taylor series propagation or warp to the original images can be performed, (see, Davis, Malcolm H., "A Physics-Based Coordinate Transformation for 3-D Image Matching" in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 16, No. 3 (1997).
  • Other types of deformable image registration algorithms are also envisioned by the presented disclosure as one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate, such as demons, b-spline, level set and the like.
  • the deformation map can be generated by various transformations, such as spline algorithms, for example, a thin plate spline transform based on corresponding mesh vertices of the segmented contours or features.
  • a set of images is used in order to perform image registration of the OOIs in a patient, for example.
  • Image registration allows the comparison or integration of data points obtained from different measurements at various times.
  • multi-dimensional splines e.g., a thin plate spline, or the like
  • a volume spline e.g., elastic spline, or other imaging registration algorithms may be used in generating a deformed planning image.
  • the locations of the OOIs including ROI contours and/or POI positions of the first planning image set are propagated or warped 67 with the deformation map and overlaid on the second planning image set for display 68 with propagated OOIs.
  • the difference between the propagated OOI locations and the actual 001 locations is determined and corrected in a local OOI correction operation 70, including ROI contour corrections and/or POI position shifting, to bring the OOIs into coincidence with the image contents.
  • the correction can be automatic, semi-automatic, or manual.
  • the second planning image set is overlaid with the propagated OOI locations.
  • the image content information and the user's knowledge are used to determine the accuracy of the propagated OOIs and modify these using editing tools if there is error.
  • Interactive software tools such as mesh editing, paint brush, or any method allowing the user to modify representations of ROIs, such as contours, binary making, or mesh vertices may be implemented.
  • the propagated OOIs would be automatically adjusted to the image content using an algorithm such as model based segmentation which may also incorporate shape priors or the like. Note that in an automatic OOI correction operation, previous display operation 68 may be skipped.
  • a corrected deformation map is generated from manual and/or automatic OOI correction operations.
  • corresponding landmark (POI) positions are used as well as corresponding points selected at locations distributed along the ROI contours.
  • ROI contour point selection vary from random selection through regular sampling to algorithms that determine boundary surface areas with large curvature, points that represent ROI extents, for example.
  • Various algorithms such as 3-D affine transformation, thin plate spline, volume spline, or elastic body spline, etc, may be used to generate a new
  • deformation map based on either the selected corresponding OOI points entirely or a combination of the selected corresponding OOI points and the original deformation transform or corresponding points.
  • the various algorithms and the like discussed above are used to achieve a global update or correction of the deformation map to account for local manual and/or automated OOI corrections in a previous operation 70. This may be performed iteratively 74 until all propagated OOI locations are corrected or until all planning criteria are met.
  • the display 26 displays the second planning image set overlaid with the OOI locations propagated from the first planning image.
  • the deformation map is applied by the radiation therapy plan and the accumulated dose map to generate an updated radiation dose map in an operation 76.
  • Applying the deformation map to the accumulated dose map transforms the OOIs and their accumulated doses into conformity with the OOIs of the planning map for calculating the RTP for the next therapy session.
  • the updated dose map is approved by the radiologist, the patient undergoes one or a series of therapy sessions 77.
  • a third planning image set is generated and the above-described steps are repeated. Additional planning images, updated deformation maps, updated radiation therapy plans and updated accumulated dose maps are generated as needed over the course of the therapy.
  • the second planning image or set could be registered to the first planning image set.
  • FIGURES 3 and 4 illustrate an example of the OOI correction operation 70 and the basis for deformation map correction operation 72.
  • An initial planning image is segmented to define an ROI contour 90 of a tumor, an organ at risk, or one or more other contoured ROIs or positioned landmark POIs or any OOIs, for example.
  • ROIs or POIs may be referred to herein, the disclosure is not limited to either one, and includes both in addition to OOIs of an image accordingly.
  • the first planning image is captured by a CT, MR, or other imaging modality 10. Operating on the first image with the initial deformation map in operation 67 propagates the ROI contour 90 to a propagated ROI contour 92 and the POI position 91 to a propagated POI position 93.
  • the propagated ROI contour 92 and the propagated POI position 93 are overlaid on the image contents of a new or second planning image, in which appears the desired shape 94 of the ROI, and the desired position 95 of the POI.
  • manual and/or automated OOI correction methods in operation 70 have produced the corrected ROI contour 92' and the corrected POI position 93' so as to bring these OOIs in coincidence with the desired locations 94 and 95 in the second planning image.
  • These local OOI corrections provide corrected points of correspondence 96' between the OOIs in the first planning image and the corrected OOI locations in the second planning image, which are used to correct the global deformation map.
  • applying the corrected deformation map to the first planning image would propagate the points of correspondence 96' of the re-propagated OOI locations 92' and 93' into better coincidence with the second planning image contents 94 and 95 (the correspondence 96' would be exactly satisfied in the case where the deformation map method relies on interpolation, whereas it would be better approximately satisfied in the case where the deformation map method relies on approximation).
  • the OOI corrections are carried out directly with the editing tools of editing sub-module 24 without any further calculation or algorithm being implemented before generating the corrected deformation map.
  • a region R in FIGURE 3 illustrates the difference between points of correspondence at the first propagated contour 92 and the structure ROI 94 in the second image. Radiation dose in region R could erroneously be attributed to the ROI defined by contour 94 rather than the adjacent ROI in the second planning image. Computer implemented algorithms can be used to reduce the difference to zero. Afterwards, the newly corrected deformation map is able to be applied to volumes, such as in a moving image, a dose volume, or any other desired volume and/or any other OOIs.
  • the corrected points of correspondence are input to an automated segmentation/contouring algorithm, which allows for relaxation of the accuracy requirements of the automated algorithm.
  • the technician is informed of which areas of the initial contour delineation need to be improved.
  • the radiation target region is the prostate and the risk regions to be delineated typically include femur heads, the bladder, and the rectum.
  • Certain contour segments are unlikely to have high impact regardless of the accuracy of delineation, while other contour segments need to be very accurate.
  • a learned or pre-calculated impact values become part of (i.e., a priori knowledge included in) a model used for automated or model-based segmentation.
  • the impact values are used as an additional (probabilistic) feature to balance accuracy in areas where contours are difficult to delineate. In such embodiments the calculation of dose during the segmentation can optionally be avoided.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Radiation-Therapy Devices (AREA)

Abstract

A radiation therapy planning system includes a planning module (20) which receives a first planning image set from a diagnostic imaging apparatus (10) and uses automatic segmentation tools (22) or manual segmentation tools (24) and a radiation therapy planning system (32) to generate a first radiation therapy plan. After the first radiation therapy plan has been applied for one or more therapy sessions, a second planning image set is generated. The planning module (20) uses a deformable image registration algorithm (30) to register the planning image set sand generate a corresponding deformation map which is applied to segmented objects of interest (OOIs) of the segmented first planning image set to propagate the objects of interest onto the second planning image set. The deformation map is corrected in accordance with deviations between the propagated and actual OOI locations in two steps: 1) manual and/or automated corrections of the propagated OOIs are performed, such as region of interest contour corrections and/or landmark point of interest positions; 2) a corrected global deformation map is generated from these local OOI corrections. The corrected deformation map is applied to the first radiation therapy plan and an accumulated radiation map depicting the radiation accumulated in each OOI during the therapy session(s) implemented with the first radiation therapy plan.

Description

INTERACTIVE DEFORMATION MAP CORRECTIONS
DESCRIPTION
The following relates to the medical diagnostic imaging arts, radiation therapy arts, medical arts, radiation therapy planning arts, image processing arts, and related arts.
In various medical treatments, diagnostic images are taken from time to time to monitor progress of a treatment regimen, advancement of a medical condition, or plan a treatment course. For example, in radiation therapy, using information from diagnostic image as a guide, spatially targeted dosages of ionizing radiation are applied to a tumor or other region containing cancerous or malignant tissue. Growing and rapidly multiplying cancer cells tend to be more susceptible to damage from ionizing radiation as compared with normal cells, and so enforced by the higher dosage administrated by proper planning, the applied radiation preferentially kills cancerous or malignant tissue. Because ionizing radiation is harmful to both malignant and healthy cells, precise spatial targeting of the radiation is important for applying effective radiation therapy to the malignancy while limiting collateral damage to healthy tissue.
In radiation therapy, the radiation beam is applied at angular positions around the subject in a manner that combines to produce a targeted total radiation dosage spatial distribution that is concentrated on the tumor or other region to be treated, while keeping the integrated exposure of certain radiation-sensitive critical organs below a safety threshold. Angular coverage can be achieved by using a plurality of stationary radiation sources distributed around the subject, or by rotating a single radiation source such as a linear accelerator (LINAC) around the subject. The radiation therapy is planned in advance for a specific subject, based on imaging data acquired of that subject. Typically, computed tomography (CT) imaging is used for radiation therapy planning, although other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance (MR), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission CT (SPECT), ultrasound, and the like may also be utilized to supplement the CT data. To plan a radiation therapy course, the tumor or other target is identified and delineated in the images, along with delineation of radiation-sensitive "risk" organs or regions whose radiation dosage must be limited. Radiation plan parameters are provided by the oncologist or other medical personnel. The radiation therapy plan parameters typically include a minimum or target dose to be delivered to the malignant tumor, and maximum permissible dosages for the risk organs or regions. The contoured targets and organs at risk together with the radiation therapy plan parameters and known information about radiation attenuation or absorption characteristics of the various tissues serve as inputs to optimize the radiation beam spatial profile and intensities to concentrate the radiation in the target while limiting exposure of risk organs in a deformation map.
In radiation therapy planning and certain image studies, deformable image registration is becoming an important tool. Deformable image registration is mapping of individual volume elements from one image to another image using non-rigid translation and/or rotations. That is, each volume element of the image is mapped separately.
Deformable image registration is required when anatomical differences exist between images that are beyond rigid translation/rotation. Some applications of deformable image registration include propagation of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs) such as contours or Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and landmarks or Point(s) of Interest (POIs), deforming PET/CT studies to a CT acquired for treatment planning for contouring and evaluation, and/or accumulation of dose computed on multiple image sets of the same patient.
Deformable image registration can be used for cases such as, but not limited to, adaptive planning for a patient during the course of therapy, 4-D planning/optimization, composite planning, and multimodality treatment plan generation.
In order to generate an accumulated dose, doses computed on multiple image sets are mapped or deformed to the same coordinate frame. The accuracy and precision of this mapping is important because errors in the mapping can result in errors being propagated when the mapping is applied to OOIs or accumulated doses. In almost every case, significant errors in the generated mapping are present as a result of limitations of the automated algorithms.
The following provides a new and improved apparatus and methods that overcome the above-referenced problems and others. In accordance with one aspect, a radiation planning module is configured to update a first radiation therapy plan (RTP) generated with a first planning image set that has been segmented to define locations of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs), including contours delineating Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or landmarks indicating Point(s) of Interest (POIs). The planning module receives a second planning image from an imaging device and registers the first and second planning images and generates a first transform deformation map which transforms one of the planning image sets into alignment with the other. The OOI locations are operated on with the deformation map to propagate the 001 locations onto the second planning image set. The deformation map is corrected in accordance with deviations between the propagated OOI locations and locations of the corresponding OOIs in the second planning image set. The first radiation therapy plan is replicated and the replication adjusted with the corrected deformation map to generate an updated radiation therapy plan for the second planning image set.
In accordance with another aspect, a method of updating a first radiation therapy plan generated from a first planning image set that has been segmented to define locations of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs), including contours delineating Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or landmarks indicating Point(s) of Interest (POIs) is provided. A second planning image set is received and the first and second planning image sets are registered with a computer-implemented algorithm to generate a first deformation map which transforms one of the planning image sets into alignment with the other. The deformation map operates on the object of interest locations to propagate the object of interest locations onto the second planning image set. The deformation map is corrected in accordance with a deviation between the propagated OOIs and locations of the
corresponding OOIs in the second planning image set. The first radiation therapy plan is replicated and the replication adjusted with the corrected deformation map to generate an updated radiation therapy plan for the second planning image set.
In accordance with another aspect, a radiation planning module is configured to contain a first planning image that has been segmented to define locations of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs), including contours delineating Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or landmarks indicating Point(s) of Interest (POIs). The planning module receives an image pair where both images are in the same coordinate frame. The planning module registers the first planning image with one of the images from the image pair and generates a first transform deformation map that transforms the planning image set into alignment with the other images. The OOI locations are operated on with the deformation map to propagate the OOI locations onto the second planning image set. The deformation map is corrected in accordance with deviations between the propagated OOI locations and locations of the corresponding OOIs in the second planning image set. Both images in the image pair are operated on with the deformation map to generate deformed images such that all three images are in the same coordinate frame.
One advantage resides in providing a deformation map for a treatment plan with less deformation errors.
Another advantage resides in providing more accurate mapping for treatment dose planning and tracking.
Another advantage resides in providing a radiologist or other medical professional to generate an improved deformation map.
Another advantage resides in providing a radiologist or other medical professional to generate an improved deformed image for contouring and analysis.
Further advantages will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading and understand the following detailed description.
FIGURE 1 diagrammatically shows a radiation therapy system including a radiation therapy planning module;
FIGURE 2 diagrammatically shows a radiation therapy planning method suitably performed by the radiation therapy planning module of the system of FIGURE 1; and,
FIGURES 3 and 4 diagrammatically show a region that diagrammatically illustrates selected operations of the method of FIGURE 2.
With reference to FIGURE 1 , a radiation therapy system includes an imaging modality 10 suitable for acquiring planning images for planning radiation therapy. In some embodiments, the imaging modality 10 is a computed tomography (CT) scanner. For example, the CT scanner has a large patient aperture, 85 cm for example, which is large enough to accommodate the patient arranged in typical radiation therapy positions. Other CT scanners can be used instead, as well as other imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance (MR), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and so forth. Acquired images are stored in an image memory 12, which may be in a central electronic records storage system. The planning image is typically acquired of the subject scheduled to undergo the radiation therapy. For example, the subject may be an oncology patient, or a veterinary subject, or the like. The term "planning image" in this context relates to the images that are used to plan radiation therapy sessions. The planning images (or set of planning images), for example, generated at two different times, are used in generating deformation maps, which describe the deformations that transform or deform the planning image generated at one time into a common coordinate system and registered with the planning image taken at a different time.
Modeling anatomical shape change as deformation, such as by a deformation map, uses landmarks, features, surfaces, and the like in 3-D to define a mapping (transformation) between two images or sets of images (e.g., of the same anatomy) into the same coordinate frame or frame of reference. Various algorithms are available for performing these mappings or transformations among sets of images. Once landmark and/or features and/or surfaces are identified and paired between the images, these points are used to compute a coordinate transformation that maps every coordinate location in one image to a corresponding location in the other image and align them accordingly into one coordinate system, which is called image registration.
A planning module 20 receives planning images at various times during a radiation therapy process. The module 20 updates an earlier radiation therapy plan (RTP) and its cumulative dose map to compensate for anatomical changes, e.g., shrinking, expanding, shifting, etc, during prior therapy sessions. A first planning image is generated and a first RTP is generated. After one or a series of therapy sessions, a subsequent planning image is generated and the module 20 updates the RTP.
The planning module 20 includes automatic segmentation tools 22 and manual segmentation and editing tools 24. Model based segmentation or other methods are used to modify a representation of the ROI boundaries, such as by contours, binary mask, or mesh vertices therein and/or the POI positions. The segmentation tools are used to delineate, e.g., with superimposed contours and/or dots, target Object(s) of Interest (OOIs) including Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or Point(s) of Interest (POIs) and other adjoining ROIs, OOIs, and/or POIs particularly at risk regions in which radiation dose is to be limited. The manual segmentation tools include editing tools, which allow the user to manually adjust image features, particularly the segmentation contours and/or the landmark positions when the images are displayed on a display 26. Manual inputs 28, such as a keyboard or mouse, enable the user to use various virtual tools to push or pull the OOIs to change their shapes and positions to conform more accurately to the image content.
For example, the radiation target region may be a cancerous tumor, and the one or more risk regions may include neighboring vital organs or tissue whose radiation exposure should be kept below a maximum value. Toward this end, the radiation therapy planning is responsive to dose plan parameters that are indicative of dosage or dosage constraints for the radiation target region and the one or more risk regions. An accumulated dose map is generated which shows the cumulative radiation dose which the treatment plan delivers to each region.
The planning module 20 also includes a deformable or elastic registration module which can implement one or more deformable, elastic registration algorithms 30. A variety of such algorithms are known in the art. The deformable registration algorithms compare two images of a common area of the same subject to determine the differences between them and generate a transform, such as a deformation map, which can be applied to one of the images to transform it into alignment or registration with the other. These algorithms typically register the image as a whole and can have local inaccuracies, particularly around a tumor that is shrinking.
One of the ways to determine the accuracy of the mapping is to analyze the propagated OOI locations. In one embodiment, if the user or the examining specialist decides that the propagated OOI locations were not mapped correctly, the editing tool module 24 is utilized to adjust contour points and/or features on the OOI locations propagated onto the second image. The specialist can adjust the OOI locations manually using contour or mesh editing, for example. The same or a different algorithm of the deformation image registration algorithm module 30 is then used to generate a new or corrected deformation map based on corresponding points of the locations of the original or first planning image set and the edited locations on the second image. The planning module 20 also includes a radiation therapy planning module or algorithm 32 which can generate an initial RTP and update the RTP including the accumulated dose each time a subsequent planning image is generated. To update the accumulated dose from a first treatment session, the corrected deformation map is applied to the subsequent plan to conform the OOIs and their dose to the planning image for a second treatment session. In this manner, the accumulated radiation in each OOI is accurately determined over a plurality of treatment sessions even as OOIs shift, shrink, expand, change shape, or the like.
A deformable image registration can be used, for example, when a radiologist compares images acquired before and after administration of a contrast enhancing pharmaceutical that highlights malignant masses. If a tumor was shrunk by the therapy, the tumor is smaller and the surrounding OOIs have relaxed back closer to their normal location. Comparison of images before and after an intervention, such as radiation therapy, is performed. A simple change in position can cause apparent deformation of a breast, for example, which further complicates the comparison. Matching or image mapping is therefore performed to eliminate the deformation. The differences remaining between the original 3-D images and the non-ideally corrected images can be determined by subtracting the two images and taking an absolute value of the result.
A control processor 34 controls the modules and algorithms to perform the method described in conjunction with FIGURE 2.
The radiation therapy plan generated by the radiation therapy planning module 20 after adjustment of any propagated OOIs is stored in a radiation therapy plan memory 50. At the scheduled day and time for the radiation therapy session, a radiation therapy apparatus 52 is employed to deliver therapeutic radiation to the subject controlled by a radiation therapy control system 54 in accordance with the radiation therapy plan stored in the memory 50. For example, in the illustrated embodiment the radiation therapy delivery apparatus 52 is a tomotherapy linear accelerator (LINAC), and the radiation therapy control system 54 operates multi-leaf collimator (MLC) or other radiation beam profile-shaping apparatus of the LINAC 52 to modulate beam intensity and profile as the linear accelerator is moved around the subject, so as to deliver a radiation dose distribution into the subject that provides the desired integrated radiation dosage to the target feature while suitably limiting or constraining radiation exposure of sensitive critical features in accordance with the radiation therapy plan.
The radiation therapy planning module 20 can be embodied by a single digital processor, two or more digital processors, computers, application-specific integrated circuitry (ASIC), or so forth. Similarly, the radiation therapy planning including editing tools for generating deformation maps may be embodied by a storage medium storing instructions executable by a digital processor to perform the planning. For example, the storage medium may be a hard disk or other magnetic storage medium, an optical disk or other optical storage medium, a random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), FLASH memory, or other electronic storage medium, various combinations thereof, or so forth.
With reference to FIGURE 2, an illustrative radiation therapy planning method suitably performed by the system of FIGURE 1 is described. In an operation 60, a first planning image is generated and/or displayed. The initial first planning image is segmented 62 to define initial segmentation contours of the target and other OOIs. The operation 62 can employ initial contouring utilizing automatic segmentation of the planning image, a semi-automatic segmentation, or manual segmentation of the OOIs. Once the initial or first planning image is segmented, a radiation therapy planning (RTP) operation is calculated 63. In one embodiment, the radiation therapy plan is generated using commercially available software. In other embodiments, the RTP plan is generated semi-automatically or manually.
Any image segmentation operation 62 and RTP operation 63 can be performed using the radiation therapy planning module 20. In an operation 77, the initial radiation therapy plan is implemented to treat the patient. For example, the LINAC 52 is used to irradiate the patient over one or a series of therapy sessions.
After the first therapy session(s), a second planning image or image set is generated at an operation 64. In a registration step 65, the first and second sets of planning images, e.g. 1st and 2nd 3-D images, are registered using a deformation algorithm to determine a transform, usually a deformation map 66, which brings the first and second planning image sets into registration or alignment. For example, a constant volume, 3-D, second order Taylor series propagation or warp to the original images can be performed, (see, Davis, Malcolm H., "A Physics-Based Coordinate Transformation for 3-D Image Matching" in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 16, No. 3 (1997). Other types of deformable image registration algorithms are also envisioned by the presented disclosure as one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate, such as demons, b-spline, level set and the like.
The deformation map can be generated by various transformations, such as spline algorithms, for example, a thin plate spline transform based on corresponding mesh vertices of the segmented contours or features. A set of images is used in order to perform image registration of the OOIs in a patient, for example. Image registration allows the comparison or integration of data points obtained from different measurements at various times. For example, multi-dimensional splines (e.g., a thin plate spline, or the like), a volume spline, elastic spline, or other imaging registration algorithms may be used in generating a deformed planning image.
The locations of the OOIs including ROI contours and/or POI positions of the first planning image set are propagated or warped 67 with the deformation map and overlaid on the second planning image set for display 68 with propagated OOIs. The difference between the propagated OOI locations and the actual 001 locations is determined and corrected in a local OOI correction operation 70, including ROI contour corrections and/or POI position shifting, to bring the OOIs into coincidence with the image contents. The correction can be automatic, semi-automatic, or manual. In a manual OOI correction operation, the second planning image set is overlaid with the propagated OOI locations. The image content information and the user's knowledge are used to determine the accuracy of the propagated OOIs and modify these using editing tools if there is error. Interactive software tools, such as mesh editing, paint brush, or any method allowing the user to modify representations of ROIs, such as contours, binary making, or mesh vertices may be implemented. In an automatic OOI correction operation, the propagated OOIs would be automatically adjusted to the image content using an algorithm such as model based segmentation which may also incorporate shape priors or the like. Note that in an automatic OOI correction operation, previous display operation 68 may be skipped.
In an operation 72, a corrected deformation map is generated from manual and/or automatic OOI correction operations. In the case of both manual and automatic correction operations, corresponding landmark (POI) positions are used as well as corresponding points selected at locations distributed along the ROI contours. Methods of ROI contour point selection vary from random selection through regular sampling to algorithms that determine boundary surface areas with large curvature, points that represent ROI extents, for example. Various algorithms such as 3-D affine transformation, thin plate spline, volume spline, or elastic body spline, etc, may be used to generate a new
deformation map based on either the selected corresponding OOI points entirely or a combination of the selected corresponding OOI points and the original deformation transform or corresponding points.
In an operation 72, the various algorithms and the like discussed above are used to achieve a global update or correction of the deformation map to account for local manual and/or automated OOI corrections in a previous operation 70. This may be performed iteratively 74 until all propagated OOI locations are corrected or until all planning criteria are met. During the deformation map correction process, the display 26 displays the second planning image set overlaid with the OOI locations propagated from the first planning image.
Once the deformation map is satisfactorily corrected, e.g. within preselected accuracy criteria, the deformation map is applied by the radiation therapy plan and the accumulated dose map to generate an updated radiation dose map in an operation 76.
Applying the deformation map to the accumulated dose map transforms the OOIs and their accumulated doses into conformity with the OOIs of the planning map for calculating the RTP for the next therapy session. Once the updated dose map is approved by the radiologist, the patient undergoes one or a series of therapy sessions 77. After the therapy session(s), in preparation for a next one or series of sessions, a third planning image set is generated and the above-described steps are repeated. Additional planning images, updated deformation maps, updated radiation therapy plans and updated accumulated dose maps are generated as needed over the course of the therapy.
Although described in terms of registering the first planning image or set to the second planning image set, the second planning image or set could be registered to the first planning image set.
FIGURES 3 and 4 illustrate an example of the OOI correction operation 70 and the basis for deformation map correction operation 72. An initial planning image is segmented to define an ROI contour 90 of a tumor, an organ at risk, or one or more other contoured ROIs or positioned landmark POIs or any OOIs, for example. Although ROIs or POIs may be referred to herein, the disclosure is not limited to either one, and includes both in addition to OOIs of an image accordingly. The first planning image is captured by a CT, MR, or other imaging modality 10. Operating on the first image with the initial deformation map in operation 67 propagates the ROI contour 90 to a propagated ROI contour 92 and the POI position 91 to a propagated POI position 93. In display operation 68, the propagated ROI contour 92 and the propagated POI position 93 are overlaid on the image contents of a new or second planning image, in which appears the desired shape 94 of the ROI, and the desired position 95 of the POI. Points of correspondence 96 between the initial OOIs and the propagated OOIs, namely selected corresponding points on ROI contours and corresponding POI positions, highlight the inaccuracy of the deformation map with respect to image contents. In FIGURE 4, manual and/or automated OOI correction methods in operation 70 have produced the corrected ROI contour 92' and the corrected POI position 93' so as to bring these OOIs in coincidence with the desired locations 94 and 95 in the second planning image. These local OOI corrections provide corrected points of correspondence 96' between the OOIs in the first planning image and the corrected OOI locations in the second planning image, which are used to correct the global deformation map. Once the deformation map has been fully corrected, applying the corrected deformation map to the first planning image would propagate the points of correspondence 96' of the re-propagated OOI locations 92' and 93' into better coincidence with the second planning image contents 94 and 95 (the correspondence 96' would be exactly satisfied in the case where the deformation map method relies on interpolation, whereas it would be better approximately satisfied in the case where the deformation map method relies on approximation).
In one embodiment, the OOI corrections are carried out directly with the editing tools of editing sub-module 24 without any further calculation or algorithm being implemented before generating the corrected deformation map. In another embodiment, a region R in FIGURE 3 illustrates the difference between points of correspondence at the first propagated contour 92 and the structure ROI 94 in the second image. Radiation dose in region R could erroneously be attributed to the ROI defined by contour 94 rather than the adjacent ROI in the second planning image. Computer implemented algorithms can be used to reduce the difference to zero. Afterwards, the newly corrected deformation map is able to be applied to volumes, such as in a moving image, a dose volume, or any other desired volume and/or any other OOIs.
With a visualization as illustrated in FIGURES 3 and 4, a radiologist or other medical professional performing the contouring benefits by receiving visual
"importance" feedback during the manual contouring, or by integrating an importance feature along the contours into an automated segmentation algorithm in the case of automated or semi-automated contouring. In some embodiments, the corrected points of correspondence are input to an automated segmentation/contouring algorithm, which allows for relaxation of the accuracy requirements of the automated algorithm. In manual contouring, the technician is informed of which areas of the initial contour delineation need to be improved.
Looking to a specific application, such as prostate treatment planning, the radiation target region is the prostate and the risk regions to be delineated typically include femur heads, the bladder, and the rectum. Certain contour segments are unlikely to have high impact regardless of the accuracy of delineation, while other contour segments need to be very accurate. In interactive segmentation, a learned or pre-calculated impact values become part of (i.e., a priori knowledge included in) a model used for automated or model-based segmentation. During the model-based segmentation process the impact values are used as an additional (probabilistic) feature to balance accuracy in areas where contours are difficult to delineate. In such embodiments the calculation of dose during the segmentation can optionally be avoided.
The disclosure has been described with reference to various embodiments. Modifications and alterations may occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. An apparatus comprising:
a planning module (20) for updating a first radiation therapy plan (RTP) generated with a first planning image set that has been segmented to define locations of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs), including contours delineating Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or landmarks indicating Point(s) of Interest (POIs) in the first planning image set, the planning module being configured to:
receive a second planning image set from an imaging device (10); register the first and second planning image sets to generate a first deformation map which transforms one of the planning image sets into alignment with the other;
operate on the OOI locations with the deformation map to propagate the OOI locations onto the second planning image set;
allow manual and/or automatic corrections of propagated OOI locations (70) in accordance with deviations between the propagated OOI locations and the second planning image set or locations of the corresponding OOIs in the second planning image set;
generate a corrected global deformation map (72) in accordance with local OOI location corrections; and
adjust the RTP with the corrected deformation map to generate an updated RTP.
2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the planning module (20) is further configured to:
receive a first cumulative dose map indicative of cumulative dose received by each of the OOIs during one or more treatment sessions performed in accordance with the first RTP;
operate on the first cumulative dose map with the corrected deformation map to generate a second cumulative dose map.
3. The apparatus according to either one of claims 1 and 2, further including:
a display device (26) on which the propagated OOI locations overlaid on the second plane image set are displayed; and
a user input device (28) by which a user controls editing tools of the planning module to adjust the propagated OOI locations.
4. The apparatus according to any one of claims 1-3, further including: one or more diagnostic image devices (10) which generate the first and second planning image sets;
a radiation therapy control system (54) which controls a radiation therapy device (52) to implement the updated RTP.
5. The apparatus according to any one of claims 1-4, wherein the planning module is further configured to:
segment the first planning image set; and
generate the first RTP from the segmented first planning image set.
6. A method of updating a first radiation therapy plan (RTP) generated from a first planning image set that has been segmented to define locations of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs), including contours delineating Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or landmarks indicating Point(s) of Interest (POIs) in the first planning image set, the method comprising:
receiving a second planning image set (64);
registering the first and second planning image sets with a computer- implemented algorithm to generate (65) a first deformation map (66) which transforms one of the planning image sets into alignment with the other;
operating on the OOI locations with the deformation map to propagate the OOI locations onto the second planning image set (67);
allowing manual and/or automatic corrections of propagated OOI locations (70) in accordance with deviations between the propagated OOI locations and the second planning image set or locations of the corresponding OOIs in the second planning image set;
generating a corrected global deformation map (72) in accordance with local OOI location corrections; and
adjusting RTP with the corrected deformation map to generate an updated
RTP (76).
7. The method according to any one of claims 1-6, wherein the initial RTP includes a cumulative dose map and further including:
operating on the original dose map with the corrected deformation map to generate an updated dose map.
8. The method according to either one of claims 6 and 7, further including:
controlling a radiation therapy device to implement the initial RTP prior to generating the second planning image set;
controlling the radiation therapy device to implement the updated RTP after generating the second plan image set.
9. The method according to any one of claims 6-8, wherein the registration algorithm (30) includes an elastic transformation, such as a thin plate or surface spline algorithm.
10. The method according to any one of claims 6-9, further including: displaying the propagated OOI locations overlaid on the second planning image set on a display device (26).
11. The method according to any one of claims 6-10, wherein correcting the deformation map includes:
identifying corresponding points on the propagated ROI contours and the second planning image; and
determining deviations between the corresponding points.
12. The method according to claim 10, wherein the deviation between points of correspondence are determined by manually adjusting (100) the propagated OOI locations.
13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the adjusting includes: using editing tools to manipulate the propagated OOI locations.
14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the editing tools include at least one of a contour, mesh vertex, or binary mask editing tool to manually editing.
15. The method according to claim 11, wherein the deviation between points of correspondence is determined by automatically adjusting the propagated OOI locations using a computer implemented algorithm to bring the propagated OOI locations into coincidence with the second planning image set or corresponding OOI locations of the second planning image set.
16. The method according to any one of claims 6-15, further including: generating the first and second planning image sets;
segmenting the first planning image set;
generating the first radiation therapy plan from the segmented first planning image set.
17. A digital processor (54) configured to perform the method according to any one of claims 6-16.
18. A non-transitory computer-readable medium carrying instructions executable by one or more digital processors to implement the method according toany one of claims 6-16.
19. A radiation therapy planning system comprising :
diagnostic imaging device (10);
radiation therapy device (52);
display device (26);
one or more processors (20) programmed to perform the method according to any one of claims 6-16.
20. A radiation planning module configured to:
receive a first planning image that has been segmented to define locations of Object(s) of Interest (OOIs), including contours delineating Region(s) of Interest (ROIs) and/or landmarks indicating Point(s) of Interest (POIs);
receive a second planning image and a third planning image that are in a common coordinate frame;
register the first planning image with the second or third planning image and generating a first deformation map which transforms the first planning image into alignment with the second or third planning image;
operate on the defined OOI locations with the deformation map to propagate the OOI locations onto the second planning image;
allow manual and/or automatic corrections of propagated OOI locations (70) in accordance with deviations between the propagated OOIs and the second planning image set or locations of the corresponding OOIs in the second planning image;
generate a corrected global deformation map (72) in accordance with local OOI location corrections in the second planning image set; and
operate on the second planning image and the third image with the corrected deformation map such that the first planning image, the second planning image, and the third image are brought into the same coordinate frame.
PCT/IB2011/055145 2010-11-23 2011-11-17 Interactive deformation map corrections WO2012069965A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US41631810P 2010-11-23 2010-11-23
US61/416,318 2010-11-23

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012069965A1 true WO2012069965A1 (en) 2012-05-31

Family

ID=45498042

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2011/055145 WO2012069965A1 (en) 2010-11-23 2011-11-17 Interactive deformation map corrections

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2012069965A1 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014096993A1 (en) * 2012-12-17 2014-06-26 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Real-time adaptive dose computation radiation therapy
EP3109824A1 (en) 2015-06-24 2016-12-28 RaySearch Laboratories AB System and method for handling image data
WO2018055066A1 (en) 2016-09-21 2018-03-29 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Apparatus for adaptive contouring of a body part
WO2018081537A1 (en) * 2016-10-31 2018-05-03 Konica Minolta Laboratory U.S.A., Inc. Method and system for image segmentation using controlled feedback
CN109771850A (en) * 2019-02-02 2019-05-21 上海赛提菲克医疗器械有限公司 A kind of adaptive radiotherapy planning modification method
CN110947108A (en) * 2018-09-27 2020-04-03 瓦里安医疗系统国际股份公司 Systems, methods and apparatus for automated target volume generation
EP3789085A1 (en) * 2019-09-05 2021-03-10 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Dose-guided deformable image registration
EP3827883A3 (en) * 2016-12-13 2021-07-21 ViewRay Technologies, Inc. Radiation therapy systems and methods
WO2021184161A1 (en) * 2020-03-16 2021-09-23 Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. Systems and methods for generating adaptive radiation therapy plan
EP4249049A1 (en) 2022-03-22 2023-09-27 RaySearch Laboratories AB Method and system for robust radiotherapy treatment planning for dose mapping uncertainties
WO2023205984A1 (en) * 2022-04-25 2023-11-02 广州科莱瑞迪医疗器材股份有限公司 Roi association and labeling method

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050251029A1 (en) * 2004-04-21 2005-11-10 Ali Khamene Radiation therapy treatment plan
WO2007014105A2 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-02-01 Tomotherapy Incorporated Method and system for adapting a radiation therapy treatment plan based on a biological model
WO2007014092A2 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-02-01 Tomotherapy Incorporated Method of placing constraints on a deformation map and system for implementing same

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050251029A1 (en) * 2004-04-21 2005-11-10 Ali Khamene Radiation therapy treatment plan
WO2007014105A2 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-02-01 Tomotherapy Incorporated Method and system for adapting a radiation therapy treatment plan based on a biological model
WO2007014092A2 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-02-01 Tomotherapy Incorporated Method of placing constraints on a deformation map and system for implementing same

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104884126A (en) * 2012-12-17 2015-09-02 皇家飞利浦有限公司 Real-time adaptive dose computation radiation therapy
JP2015536783A (en) * 2012-12-17 2015-12-24 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェKoninklijke Philips N.V. Radiotherapy with real-time adaptive dose calculation
CN104884126B (en) * 2012-12-17 2018-08-03 皇家飞利浦有限公司 Real-time adaptive Rapid Dose Calculation radiation therapy
US10080910B2 (en) 2012-12-17 2018-09-25 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Real-time adaptive dose computation radiation therapy
WO2014096993A1 (en) * 2012-12-17 2014-06-26 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Real-time adaptive dose computation radiation therapy
US10467761B2 (en) 2015-06-24 2019-11-05 Raysearch Laboratories Ab System and method for handling image data
EP3109824A1 (en) 2015-06-24 2016-12-28 RaySearch Laboratories AB System and method for handling image data
WO2016207271A1 (en) 2015-06-24 2016-12-29 Raysearch Laboratories Ab System and method for handling image data
WO2018055066A1 (en) 2016-09-21 2018-03-29 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Apparatus for adaptive contouring of a body part
US10937170B2 (en) 2016-09-21 2021-03-02 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Apparatus for adaptive contouring of a body part
CN109964249A (en) * 2016-09-21 2019-07-02 皇家飞利浦有限公司 The device delineated for the adaptive profile to body part
WO2018081537A1 (en) * 2016-10-31 2018-05-03 Konica Minolta Laboratory U.S.A., Inc. Method and system for image segmentation using controlled feedback
US11931602B2 (en) 2016-12-13 2024-03-19 Viewray Technologies, Inc. Radiation therapy systems and methods
EP3827883A3 (en) * 2016-12-13 2021-07-21 ViewRay Technologies, Inc. Radiation therapy systems and methods
CN110947108A (en) * 2018-09-27 2020-04-03 瓦里安医疗系统国际股份公司 Systems, methods and apparatus for automated target volume generation
CN110947108B (en) * 2018-09-27 2023-07-28 瓦里安医疗系统国际股份公司 Systems, methods, and apparatus for automatic target volume generation
US12064646B2 (en) 2018-09-27 2024-08-20 Siemens Healthineers International Ag Systems, methods and devices for automated target volume generation
CN109771850B (en) * 2019-02-02 2021-12-07 张家港赛提菲克医疗器械有限公司 Self-adaptive radiotherapy plan correcting device
CN109771850A (en) * 2019-02-02 2019-05-21 上海赛提菲克医疗器械有限公司 A kind of adaptive radiotherapy planning modification method
WO2021043675A1 (en) * 2019-09-05 2021-03-11 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Dose-guided deformable image registration
EP3789085A1 (en) * 2019-09-05 2021-03-10 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Dose-guided deformable image registration
WO2021184161A1 (en) * 2020-03-16 2021-09-23 Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. Systems and methods for generating adaptive radiation therapy plan
EP4249049A1 (en) 2022-03-22 2023-09-27 RaySearch Laboratories AB Method and system for robust radiotherapy treatment planning for dose mapping uncertainties
US12083358B2 (en) 2022-03-22 2024-09-10 Raysearch Laboratories Ab (Publ) Method and system for robust radiotherapy treatment planning for dose mapping uncertainties
WO2023205984A1 (en) * 2022-04-25 2023-11-02 广州科莱瑞迪医疗器材股份有限公司 Roi association and labeling method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1778074B1 (en) Weighted surface-to-surface mapping
US10300305B2 (en) Image guidance for radiation therapy
CN103782320B (en) In deformable image registration workflow, the correction of user input and deformation vector field is integrated
WO2012069965A1 (en) Interactive deformation map corrections
US8929621B2 (en) Methods and systems for segmentation and surface matching
Xing et al. Computational challenges for image-guided radiation therapy: framework and current research
CN114555187A (en) Adaptive radiation therapy using composite imaging slices
CN110947108A (en) Systems, methods and apparatus for automated target volume generation
US20130301893A1 (en) Contour delineation for radiation therapy planning with real-time contour segment impact rendering
US9498645B2 (en) Dose deformation error calculation method and system
US12083358B2 (en) Method and system for robust radiotherapy treatment planning for dose mapping uncertainties
Sun et al. Imaging study of pseudo-CT images of superposed ultrasound deformation fields acquired in radiotherapy based on step-by-step local registration
US20220323789A1 (en) Dose-guided deformable image registration
Lin et al. Development of a novel post-processing treatment planning platform for 4D radiotherapy
Wang et al. 3D volumetric visualization with automatic rigid and deformable hybrid image registration for adaptive radiotherapy
Veduruparthi et al. Multimodal image registration of lung images

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11810652

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 11810652

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1