WO2007020737A1 - 無線通信システムの無線パラメータ決定方法および装置 - Google Patents
無線通信システムの無線パラメータ決定方法および装置 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2007020737A1 WO2007020737A1 PCT/JP2006/310530 JP2006310530W WO2007020737A1 WO 2007020737 A1 WO2007020737 A1 WO 2007020737A1 JP 2006310530 W JP2006310530 W JP 2006310530W WO 2007020737 A1 WO2007020737 A1 WO 2007020737A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- tilt angle
- area
- weighting value
- areas
- important
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/24—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field for communication between two or more posts
- H04B7/26—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field for communication between two or more posts at least one of which is mobile
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
- H04W16/02—Resource partitioning among network components, e.g. reuse partitioning
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
- H04W16/18—Network planning tools
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a wireless communication system including a plurality of base stations, and in particular, to improve communication service quality in important areas as well as communication quality of all areas in a service area of the wireless communication system.
- the present invention relates to a wireless parameter determination method and wireless parameter determination device used in determining wireless parameters of a station. Background art
- a wireless communication system including a plurality of base stations providing communication services to mobile users and fixed users distributed over a plurality of areas, when constructing a wireless communication system or existing wireless communication When additional wireless stations are deployed in the system, the wireless parameters of each base station are determined to provide high quality communication services.
- the tilt angle of an antenna having directivity in the vertical plane can be mentioned.
- Other examples include the ground height of the antenna, and the transmission power of the pilot channel transmitted from the antenna.
- the wireless network design tool determines the propagation loss from the antenna to a predetermined point based on information such as the location of the base station where the antenna that determines the wireless parameters is installed, altitude, buildings, terrain, etc. From the transmission power, the directivity direction in the horizontal plane of the antenna, the beam pattern in the horizontal plane and the vertical plane of the antenna, and the propagation loss determined above, the antenna power is calculated when the signal to be transmitted is received at a predetermined point. Also, calculate the reception quality indicated by S ZN (signal to noise) ratio and SIR (signal power to interference ratio).
- S ZN signal to noise
- SIR signal to interference ratio
- the point is defined as a "deterioration point" when the reception power and reception quality of a predetermined value are satisfied, and the wireless network design tool determines the deterioration rate, which is the ratio of the deterioration point in the entire service area.
- the wireless network design tool generates a mobile user virtually, calculates interference power due to the mobile user generation, and determines whether or not the user can be accommodated. Calculate the wireless capacity defined by the number of possible users or traffic volume.
- the wireless network design tool can automatically determine the above-mentioned degradation rate, wireless parameters that become larger or have larger wireless capacity.
- an antenna whose coverage deterioration rate of one antenna is equal to or more than a predetermined value is selected as an antenna whose tilt angle should be reduced, and the tilt angle of the selected antenna is set small.
- the update angle of the tilt angle when making smaller is a fixed angle.
- an antenna whose coverage degradation rate of one antenna is less than or equal to a predetermined value is selected as an antenna for which the tilt angle should be increased.
- the update angle of the tilt angle is a fixed angle. Then, the above processing is automatically repeated to obtain a tilt angle that reduces the deterioration rate of the entire area.
- the tilt angle update method for other general wireless parameters is, for example, any algorithm in the "optimization process” as a wireless network optimization method disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-204069. It is stated that it is possible to use Specifically, there are several methods, including general optimization algorithms and genetic algorithms in the field of combinatorial optimization that targets degradation rate, coverage and wireless capacity. If the processing speed of the optimization algorithm is not a problem, in the case of a small wireless communication system scale, a "round-robin method" is also available to search for and try combinations of all the wireless parameters.
- FIG. 10 shows a configuration of a conventional example of a wireless parameter determination device which uses an objective function as a degradation rate for a tilt angle of an antenna which is a typical wireless parameter.
- the tilt angle determining means 102 configured to reduce the rate of deterioration of the entire area determines the tilt angle to reduce the rate of deterioration of the entire area, with the initial tilt angle as an initial value, and determines the entire area after determining the tilt angle. And the tilt angle of the whole area. Disclosure of the invention
- the wireless parameter determination method can obtain wireless parameters that improve the communication service quality of only the entire area in the wireless communication system.
- Important areas are not necessarily related to the amount of traffic generated, and include, for example, areas including government offices, city halls, highways, and schools designated as shelters.
- Patent Document 1 has an objective function in which an area is weighted by traffic, but does not have an objective function related to a significant area, so that the wireless communication quality of the important area is improved. It was impossible to determine the parameters.
- the present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and it is a wireless parameter that provides not only the communication service quality of all areas in a wireless communication system but also a wireless parameter that improves the communication service quality of important areas. It is about providing a decision method.
- the wireless parameter determination method for an antenna of a wireless communication system comprises: each wireless base determining a communication service quality of a wireless communication system including a plurality of wireless base stations A method of determining radio parameters at a local station, comprising:
- a weighted sum of values indicating communication service quality in a first area and a second area to which a first weighting value is assigned among areas in which the plurality of radio base stations are arranged, and the first radio parameter A second step of determining a second radio parameter based on the second step; a third step of accepting a constraint condition on a weighted sum of values indicating communication service quality in the first area and the second area;
- a weighted sum of values indicating service quality of the first area and the second area to which the constraint received in the third step and the second weighting value different from the first weighting value are given;
- the value indicating the communication service quality may be a wireless capacity!
- the constraint in the fourth step is based on a weighted sum of values indicating communication service quality of the first area and the second area by the weighting value after determination of the second wireless parameter. Even if it is.
- the first area is an important area including a government office, a city office, a highway, a school designated as a shelter, etc.
- the second area is an entire area including the important area.
- the weighting values of the important areas are 0, the weighting values of all the areas are 1, and the weighting values of the important areas are 1 in the weighting values in the fourth step. And the weight value of all areas may be zero.
- the weighting value of the important area is 1, the weighting value of all the areas is 0, and the weighting value of the important area ⁇ in the fourth step. And the weight value of the whole area may be 1.
- the wireless parameter determination device of a wireless communication system comprises means for receiving a first wireless parameter as an initial value; A weighted sum of values indicating communication service quality in a first area and a second area to which a first weighting value is assigned among areas in which the plurality of radio base stations are arranged, and the first radio parameter Means for determining a second radio parameter based on
- a weighted sum of values indicating service quality of the first area and the second area to which the constraint received in the third step and the second weighting value different from the first weighting value are given; Means for determining a third radio parameter based on the second radio parameter;
- the weighted sum of the value indicating the communication service quality in the first area and the second area to which the first weighting value is assigned, and the initial value are the initial values.
- the second wireless parameter is determined based on the wireless parameter of 1, and then, the constraint condition, the weighted sum of the values indicating the quality of service of the first area and the second area to which the second weighting value is given, and
- the third wireless parameter is determined based on the second wireless parameter.
- the second radio parameter reflects the first weighting value
- the third radio parameter reflects the constraint and the second weighting value. Since the first and second weighting values are assigned to each of the first and second areas, communication of the entire area can be achieved by setting the first and second weighting values according to each area. In addition to service quality, it is possible to set a wireless metric focusing on communication service quality wireless parameters in a predetermined area.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a tilt angle determination device according to a first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 This is an example of distribution of important areas and all areas in the service area of the wireless communication system.
- FIG. 3a shows the processing operation of the tilt angle determination method showing the operation of the first embodiment of the present invention Flow chart.
- FIG. 4 It is a block diagram showing a configuration of a tilt angle determination device according to a second embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5a is a flowchart showing the processing operation of the tilt angle determination method showing the operation of the second embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a tilt angle determination device according to a third embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of first tilt angle determination means in the first, second and third embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of second tilt angle determination means in the first, second and third embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a conventional tilt angle determination device.
- Second tilt angle determination means for reducing the weighted sum of degradation rates of the important area and the entire area by the second weighting value
- Weighted sum calculation means by weighting values of degradation rates of all areas and important areas at updated tilt angles
- Weighted sum calculation means by weighting values of degradation rates of all areas and important areas at updated tilt angles (second tilt angle determination means)
- tilt angle update control means (second tilt angle determination means)
- Step to set S 103 P 1 current wla-Pa + wlb-Pb
- Step to set S 115 P2current w2a ⁇ Pa + w2b ⁇ Pb
- Embodiments of the present invention will be described with respect to an apparatus and method for determining a tilt angle of an antenna, which is a typical wireless parameter. Also, the value indicating the quality of communication service to be improved is the degradation rate.
- the wireless parameters include the ground height of the antenna, the transmission power of the pilot channel transmitted from the antenna, and the like in addition to the antenna angle of the antenna. 'There is no loss of sex.
- the value indicating the quality of communication service to be improved includes wireless capacity etc., but the generality of the embodiment of the present invention is not lost.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a tilt angle determination device according to a first embodiment of the present invention.
- a means 11 for inputting the initial tilt angle of the antenna, a first tilt angle determining means 12 for reducing the deterioration rate of the entire area, and an entire area after the first tilt angle is determined.
- the second embodiment is comprised of an increase allowable parameter input means 13 based on the deterioration rate of the above, a constraint condition setting means 14 and a second tilt angle determination means 15 for reducing the deterioration rate of the important area.
- the means 11 for inputting the initial tilt angle of the antenna receives the input of the initial tilt angle from the user of the wireless network design tool, to the first tilt angle determining means 12 for reducing the deterioration rate of the whole area. , Supply the initial tilt angle received.
- the first tilt angle determination means 12 for reducing the deterioration rate of the entire area determines the tilt angle at which the deterioration rate of the entire area is smaller than that of the initial value, using the initial tilt angle as the initial value.
- the tilt angle after the determination of the first tilt angle is supplied to the second tilt angle determination means 15 for reducing the deterioration rate of the important area.
- the method of determining the tilt angle at which the deterioration rate is reduced uses, for example, a method proposed in PCT application, PCT / JP2005 / 000506. The specific method is shown below.
- a process of selecting “an antenna whose coverage deterioration rate of one antenna is a predetermined value or more” as an antenna whose tilt angle should be reduced is performed, and the tilt angles of a plurality of selected antennas are set small.
- the update angle of the tilt angle at the time of reduction is a fixed angle.
- processing is performed to select “an antenna whose coverage degradation rate is lower than a predetermined value” as the antenna for which the tilt angle should be increased, and the tilt angles of the plurality of selected antennas are set large.
- the update angle of the tilt angle is a fixed angle.
- the tilt angle is updated when the deterioration rate of the whole area is reduced by the update of the tilt angle.
- the process of adding the process of updating the tilt angle is repeated if the deterioration rate of the entire area is small. Then, the tilt angle at which the deterioration rate of the entire area is reduced is determined.
- the tilt angle at which the degradation rate of all areas is reduced is determined.
- the first tilt angle determining means 12 for reducing the deterioration rate of all areas simultaneously supplies the restriction rate setting means 14 with the deterioration rates of all areas at the tilt angle after the first tilt angle is determined.
- the increase allowable parameter input means 13 based on the deterioration rate of the entire area after the determination of the first tilt angle is based on the deterioration rate of the entire area after the determination of the first tilt angle from the user of the wireless network design tool. Accept input of increase allowable parameters.
- the increase allowable parameter input unit 13 that has received the input supplies the increase allowable parameter to the constraint setting unit 14.
- Constraint condition setting means 14 includes an increase allowance parameter from increase allowance parameter input means 13 based on the deterioration rate of the entire area after the first tilt angle is determined, and the entire area after the first tilt angle is determined.
- the second tilt angle determining means 15 which reduces the degradation rate of the important area using the degradation rate supplies the constraint condition on the degradation rate of the whole area.
- the second tilt angle determining means 15 for reducing the degradation rate of the important area is further configured to satisfy the constraint condition on the degradation rate of the entire area, with the tilt angle after the first tilt angle being decided as an initial value. 1 Determine a tilt angle at which the deterioration rate of the important area is smaller than that at the tilt angle after the tilt angle is determined, and output the tilt angle to the outside as the tilt angle after the second tilt angle is determined.
- the method of determining the tilt angle at which the deterioration rate used by the second tilt angle determining means 15 is small is the “all area” for the method used by the first tilt angle determining means 12 for reducing the deterioration rate of all the areas. It is the same method replaced by "important area”.
- a configuration example of the second tilt angle determination means 15 will be described later. Further, the second tilt angle determination means 15 for reducing the deterioration rate of the important area outputs the deterioration rate of the important area at the tilt angle after the second tilt angle is determined and the deterioration rate of all the areas to the outside.
- FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing a configuration of first tilt angle determination means 12, and the configuration shown in FIG. 8 is shown.
- the configuration can also be used for the first tilt angle determination means 22 in the second embodiment described later and the first tilt angle determination means 32 in the third embodiment.
- the first tilt angle determination means 12 weights the deterioration rate by the weighting value of the entire area and the important area for calculating the weighted sum of the deterioration rates by the weighting values of the entire area and the important area based on the inputted tilt angle.
- the tilt angle is calculated based on the sum calculation means 110, the process switching means 120 for selecting whether to increase or decrease the tilt angle, or the process switching means 120 for changing the process of termination.
- Processing according to the weighted sum calculation means by weighted value of deterioration rate of all areas and important areas in the corner, decrease of weighted sum of deterioration rates of all areas and important area, or number of times of weighted sum of deterioration rates Process switching for controlling the operation of the switching means 120, the first tilt angle updating means 140 and the second tilt angle updating means 170, the tilt angle updating control means 150, and the weighted sum of the input tilt angle and the deterioration rate Data of the weighted sum data of the tilt angle and the deterioration rate for storing the data, and the data storage means 180 of the weighted sum of the tilt angle and the deterioration rate, and output as the tilt angle after determination of each antenna Tilt angle and Having a ratio weighted sum output means 190.
- weighted sum calculation means 110 for degradation rates by weighting values of all areas and important areas will be described.
- Weighted sum calculation means 110 of degradation rates by weighting values of all areas and important areas is the coverage deterioration rate of each antenna at the input tilt angle, and the first weighting of degradation rates of all areas and important areas. Calculate the weighted sum by value.
- the first weighting value is assumed to be set to 1 for all areas and 0 for important areas, since the tilt angle for reducing the deterioration rate for all areas is determined first. Do. Therefore, I will write it later
- the weighted sum of degradation rates corresponds to the degradation rates of all areas.
- the weighted sum calculation means 110 for the deterioration rate based on the weight values of the whole area and the important area supplies the deterioration rate of the coverage of each antenna described above to the process switching means 120. Also, the weighted sum of the degradation rates of all areas and important areas by the first weighting value is supplied to the processing switching means 120.
- the process switching means 120 receives output information from the process switching control means 150 as input, and according to the input, antenna selection means 130 for decreasing the tilt angle of the coverage degradation rate of each antenna separately or It switches to the antenna selection means 160 which enlarges the tilt angle, or terminates without outputting to either, and ends the processing.
- the antenna selection unit 130 for reducing the tilt angle selects an antenna for reducing the tilt angle using the coverage deterioration rate of each antenna input from the processing switching unit 120, and selects the selected antenna information as the first tilt.
- the corner updating means 140 is supplied. In the antenna selection operation, “an antenna whose coverage deterioration rate of one antenna is a predetermined value or more” is selected as an antenna whose tilt angle should be reduced.
- the antenna selection means 160 for increasing the tilt angle is different from the antenna selection means 130 for reducing the tilt angle in that the antenna selection means for increasing the tilt angle is different from the antenna selection means 130.
- the antenna selection means 130 differs from the antenna selection means 130 only in that an antenna with a coverage degradation rate of less than a predetermined value is selected as an antenna for which the tilt angle should be increased, and an antenna for reducing the tilt angle. Same as selection method 130.
- Information on the antenna selected by the antenna selection means 130 for reducing the tilt angle or the antenna selection means 160 for increasing the tilt angle is supplied to the second tilt angle update means 170.
- the first tilt angle update means 140 When the control information from the process switching / tilt angle change control means 150 is input, the first tilt angle update means 140 first performs a process to restore the tilt angle updated immediately before. Then, the first tilt angle updating means 140 takes the selected antenna information, which is the output information of the antenna selecting means 30 for reducing the tilt angle, as an input and reduces the tilt angle of the selected antenna by a predetermined angle. Weighted sum calculation means 145 by weighting values of deterioration rates of all areas and weight areas at the tilt angle after updating the value of the reduced tilt angle, the tilt angle and the deterioration rate To the weighted sum data storage means 180.
- the second tilt angle update means 170 has the same operation as the first tilt angle update means 140 except that the update direction of the tilt angle is different. That is, when the control information from the process switching 'tilt angle change control means 150 is input, the process of returning the tilt angle updated immediately before is performed, and the output of the antenna selection means 160 for enlarging the tilt angle.
- the selected antenna information is input, and the tilt angle of the selected antenna is increased by a predetermined angle, and the value of the increased tilt angle is weighted to the degradation rates of all areas and the important area at the updated tilt angle.
- the data is supplied to weighted sum calculation means 145 by value and data storage means 180 for tilt angle and deterioration rate.
- Weighted sum calculation means 145 by weighting values of degradation rates of all areas and important areas at the updated tilt angle is outputted from first tilt angle update means 140 and second tilt angle update means 170.
- the degradation rate of the coverage of each antenna is calculated using the tilt angle of each antenna after the update as an input, and is supplied to the processing switching means 120. Furthermore, using the first weighting value of the whole area and the important area as input, the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the whole area and the important area at the updated tilt angle is calculated by the first weighting value.
- the information of the weighted sum by the first weighting value of the degradation rate of the whole area and the important area at the updated tilt angle is stored in the process switching 'tilt angle update control means 150 and the data storage of the weighted sum of the tilt angle and the degradation rate. Supply to means 180.
- the tilt angle update control means 150 is a weighted sum calculation means of deterioration rates of all areas and important areas at the updated tilt angle. Weighted deterioration rates of all areas and important areas which are output from the means 145 The sum is used as the input, and the switching operation is performed according to the number of times of input of the weighted sum of deterioration rates of all areas and important areas.
- control signal is supplied to the processing switching means 120 so as to switch if the input of the weighted sum of the deterioration rates of all areas and important areas is equal to or more than a predetermined number of times. Also, a control signal is provided to end the process when the number of switching times is equal to or greater than a predetermined number.
- the weighted sum of the deterioration rates of all areas and important areas after updating the tilt angle is smaller than that at the time of processing after updating the previous tilt angle. If not, the tilt is applied to the first tilt angle updating means 140 and the second tilt angle updating means 170. Provide a control signal to undo the corner update.
- the tilt angle and deterioration rate data storage means 180 includes information on the tilt angles of the respective antennas outputted by the first tilt angle update means 140 and the second tilt angle update means 170 and the tilt angles after the update.
- the weighted sum calculation means based on the weighted values of deterioration rates of all areas and important areas
- the weighted sum of the deterioration rates of all areas and important areas output by the first weighted value of the important areas is input. Then, it stores and stores the input tilt angle information of each antenna and the weighted sum data based on the first weighting value of the deterioration rate of the whole area and the important area.
- the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the whole area and the important area by the information on the tilt angle of each antenna and the first weighting value
- Tilt angle and degradation rate weighted sum output means 190 Tilt angle and degradation rate weighted sum output means 190.
- the tilt angle and degradation rate weighted sum output means 190 is the tilt angle information of each antenna finally output from the tilt angle and degradation rate data storage means 180 and the first area of all areas and significant areas at the tilt angle 1 Output the data of the weighted sum of the deterioration rate by the weighting value.
- FIG. 9 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the second tilt angle determination means 15. The configuration of the second tilt angle determination means 15 will be described in detail below with reference to FIG.
- the configuration of the second tilt angle determination means 15 shown in FIG. 9 is the second tilt angle determination means 25 in the second embodiment described later, and the second tilt angle determination in the third embodiment. It is a configuration that can also be used for Method 35.
- the second tilt angle determination means 15 performs weighted sum calculation means 245 with weighted values of degradation rates of all areas and important areas at the updated tilt angle. , And means 290 for outputting a weighted sum of degradation rates.
- the second weighting value of the whole area and the important area is input, which is equal to the first weighting value of the whole area and the important area.
- the tilt angle for reducing the deterioration rate of the important area is determined. , All areas are set to 0, Important areas are set to 1.
- the sum calculation means 245 uses the first weight values of all areas and important areas supplied from the outside and the tilt angle information of each antenna supplied from the first tilt angle update means 140 and the second tilt angle update means 170. Based on the above, the weighted sum of the degradation rates of all areas and important areas at the updated tilt angle is calculated.
- Weighted sum calculation means 245 by weighted values of deterioration rates of all areas and important areas at the tilt angle after update processing of the weighted sum of the deterioration rates which is the calculation result, tilt angle update control means 250 And the degradation rate weighted sum output means 290.
- the process switching 'tilt angle update control means 250 in the second tilt angle determination means 15 is supplied from the outside in addition to the operation of the process switching in the first tilt angle determination means 12 ⁇ tilt angle update control means 150 Information of the update constraints on the degradation rate of the whole area and the important area by the first weighting value, and the output from the weighted sum calculation means 245 by the weighted value of the degradation rate of the whole area and the important area at the updated tilt angle.
- the configuration and the operation of the second tilt angle determining means 15 are the same as the configuration and the operation of the first tilt angle determining means 12 except for the case described above.
- FIG. 2 shows an example of the planar distribution of the important area and the whole area in the wireless communication service area.
- the important area is included in the entire area, if adjustment is performed focusing on only the deterioration rate of the important area in determining the tilt angle, the area other than the important area has a large interference, and the entire area is The rate of deterioration of Conversely, if adjustment is made so that the deterioration rate of all areas is reduced, the deterioration rate of the important area will be greater than the deterioration rate when the adjustment is performed focusing on only the deterioration rate of the important area. In other words, qualitatively, the degradation rate of important areas and the degradation rate of all areas are in a roughly trade-off relationship.
- the first tilt angle determining means 12 for reducing the deterioration rate of the entire area first Reduce the deterioration rate. Thereafter, the second tilt angle determining means 15 determines the first tilt angle. With the tilt angle determined in step 12 as the initial value, the tilt angle to reduce the degradation rate of the important area is determined while satisfying the restriction condition by the increase allowable parameter based on the degradation rate of the entire area.
- FIGS. 3a and 3b are flowcharts showing the operation of the present embodiment, and the process of determining the tilt angle according to the present embodiment will be described below with reference to FIGS. 3a and 3b.
- the weighted sum calculation means 110 of the deterioration rate by the weight values of the whole area and the important area is performed when the first weighting value of the whole area and the important area is set as the all area 1 and the important area 0.
- the step of temporarily updating the tilt angle comprises antenna selection means 130 for reducing the tilt angle, antenna selection means 160 for increasing the tilt angle, first tilt angle update means 140 and second tilt. It is implemented by corner updating means 170.
- step S 5 weighted sum calculation means 145 using the weighted values of the deterioration rates of the entire area and the important area at the updated tilt angle 1st weighted value of important areas All area 1 and important area 0 are implemented.
- step S8 The step of updating the tilt angle !, step (step S8), and the step of updating the tilt angle (step S9) are performed by the first tilt angle updating means 140 and the second tilt angle updating means 170. It will be implemented.
- the subsequent steps are processed by the configuration of the second tilt angle determination means 15 shown in FIG.
- step S 13 The step of setting an increase allowable parameter based on Plopt (step S 13) is performed by the process switching in the second tilt angle determination unit 15 and the tilt angle control unit 250.
- step S 14 the step of calculating the degradation rate Pa of the important area
- step S 15 the degradation rate due to the weighting values of the entire area and the important area This is carried out when the first weighting value of all areas and important areas input to the weighted sum calculation means 110 of the present invention is all area 0 and important area 1.
- the step of temporarily updating the tilt angle includes antenna selection means 130 for reducing the tilt angle, antenna selection means 160 for increasing the tilt angle, and first tilt angle update means 14.
- the step of calculating the deterioration rate Pa of the important area is the second weighting value of all areas and important area. Assuming all area 0 and important area 1, all areas at the updated tilt angle And the weighted sum calculation means 145 by the weighted value of the degradation rate of the important area.
- the step of calculating the deterioration rate Pb of the entire area is the first weighting value of the whole area and the important area, assuming that the whole area 1 and the important area 0 are all areas at the updated tilt angle. And the weighted sum calculation means 245 by the weighted value of the degradation rate of the important area.
- step S 22 and the step of updating the tilt angle (step S 24) correspond to the first tilt angle updating means 140 and the second tilt angle updating means 170. Will be implemented.
- step S27 The step of outputting Plcurrent and P2current and the tilt angle when the end condition is satisfied (step S27) is performed by the tilt angle and the deterioration rate weighted sum output unit 190 and the deterioration rate weighted sum output unit 290. .
- step SI the initial tilt angle input by the user of the wireless network design tool is set to an initial value.
- step S2 the deterioration rate Pb of the entire area is calculated.
- PI current in step S3 the deterioration rate Pb of the entire area is calculated.
- step S4 the tilt angle of any of the antennas is temporarily updated by a certain angle.
- a specific method of tentative update of the tilt angle is shown below.
- the process of reducing the tilt angle and the process of increasing the tilt angle are switched according to the number of times of step S4.
- the number of times of processing in step S4 is 1 to 10, 21 to 30, or 41 to 50, processing is performed to reduce the tilt angle.
- a process of selecting “an antenna whose coverage deterioration rate of one antenna is equal to or more than a predetermined value” is selected as an antenna whose tilt angle should be reduced, and the tilt angles of the plurality of selected antennas are set small.
- the temporary update angle of the tilt angle when making it smaller is a fixed angle.
- step S4 if the number of times of processing in step S4 is 11 to 20, 31 to 40, or 51 to 60, processing is performed to increase the tilt angle.
- a process of selecting “an antenna whose degradation rate of coverage of one antenna is less than a predetermined value” is selected as an antenna whose tilt angle should be increased, and the tilt angles of a plurality of selected antennas are set large.
- the temporary update angle of the tilt angle at the time of enlargement is a fixed angle.
- step S7 it is determined whether Pltemp is Plcurrent, if Pltemp is not Plcurrent, then the tilt angle is not updated, the process proceeds to step (step S8), and if Pltemp is Plcurrent, it is tentatively determined in step S4. A process of moving to the step of updating the updated tilt angle (step S9) is performed.
- step S8 the processing proceeds to step (step S11) of determining an end condition without updating the tilt angle temporarily updated in step S4.
- step S9 temporary update is performed in step S4.
- step S12 the minimum deterioration rate in the processing so far is set to Plopt. Also, the tilt angle at that time is a tilt angle that realizes Plopt.
- step S13 the increase allowance parameter based on Plopt is set to a value manually input by the wireless network design tool. Specifically, set proportional value A and constant value B.
- step S14 the deterioration rate Pa of the important area is calculated.
- step S16 the tilt angle of one of the antennas is temporarily updated by an angle. The method of temporary updating is the same as step S4.
- step S17 the deterioration rate Pa of the important area is calculated.
- step S18 the deterioration rate Pb of the entire area is calculated.
- step S21 it is determined whether P2temp or P2current, and if P2temp ⁇ P2current! /, The tilt angle is not updated !, and the process proceeds to step (step S22), P2 temp ⁇ If it is P2 current, the process proceeds to the step (step S23) of determining whether Pltemp or A * Plopt + B.
- step S23 it is determined whether Pltemp ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ A * Plopt + B. If Pltemp or A * Plopt + B is not satisfied, then the process proceeds to step S22, and Pltemp is not reached. If t + B is satisfied, the process proceeds to the step of updating the tilt angle (step S24).
- step S22 the process proceeds to step S26 without updating the tilt angle.
- step S24 the tilt angle temporarily updated in step S4 is updated, and the process proceeds to step S25.
- Plcurrent Pltemp are set.
- step S26 processing for determining an end condition is performed. Specifically, a condition that P2current is less than a predetermined value or a condition that the number of repetitions of step S26 is equal to or more than a predetermined number is used as the termination condition. If the end condition is satisfied, the process proceeds to step S27. Otherwise, the process returns to step S16, and steps S16 to S26 are repeated.
- Step 27 outputs Plcurrent, P2current and the tilt angle when the end condition is satisfied.
- the present embodiment includes not only the process of reducing the deterioration rate of the entire area but also the process of reducing the deterioration rate of the important area. Therefore, the degradation rate of the important area can be reduced compared to the conventional method that can reduce only the degradation rate of the entire area. Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the process of reducing the deterioration rate of the entire area is first performed, and the process of reducing the deterioration rate of the important area is performed using the result, thereby reducing the deterioration rate of the important area. As the deterioration rate of the whole area is too large, and the restriction conditions are applied, it is necessary to reduce the deterioration rate of the important area while suppressing the deterioration rate of the whole area from becoming large. Can.
- the ground height and antenna force of the antenna are also transmitted from the antenna tilt angle to be updated. Even if it is replaced with the transmission power of the pilot channel, it can be implemented similarly without losing the generality of the radio parameter determination device of the present invention.
- a concrete method of replacing the ground height of the antenna is shown below. Increasing the antenna tilt angle is replaced with lowering the antenna ground height, and decreasing the antenna tilt angle is replaced with raising the antenna ground height.
- the antenna tilt angle is increased, transmission power is less likely to spread in the coverage area, and when the antenna ground height is decreased, transmission power is spread in the coverage area. There is. If the antenna tilt angle is reduced, the transmission power is likely to spread in the coverage area, and if the antenna height is increased, the transmission power is likely to be spread in the coverage area. Also, since the quality of communication service including the rate of deterioration is strongly related to how the transmission power spreads into the coverage area, the wireless object according to the present invention can be used even if the antenna tilt angle is replaced with the antenna ground height. The same can be done without losing the generality of the parameter determination device.
- the concrete replacement of the transmission power of the pilot channel to which the antenna power is transmitted is shown below.
- Increasing the antenna tilt angle is replaced by decreasing the pilot channel transmission power
- decreasing the antenna tilt angle is replaced by increasing the pilot channel transmission power.
- the antenna tilt angle is increased, the transmission power is less likely to spread in the coverage area, and when the pilot channel transmission power is decreased, the transmission power is likely to be spread in the coverage area.
- the antenna tilt angle is reduced, the transmission power is likely to spread in the coverage area, and when the pilot channel transmission power is increased, the transmission power is likely to be spread in the coverage area.
- the present invention can be achieved even if the antenna tilt angle is replaced with the transmission power of the pilot channel. The same can be implemented without losing the generality of the wireless parameter determination device according to.
- the degradation rate can be obtained by calculating the ratio of the reception power in a predetermined value or the point where reception quality does not meet occupy in the specified area, while the wireless capacity is within the designated area.
- the objective function is determined based on the deterioration rate. Because the process of reducing the rate of degradation is replaced by the process of increasing the wireless capacity, the generality of the wireless parameter determination device according to the present invention is not lost. That is, in the first embodiment, the radio capacity is increased instead of reducing the deterioration rate. By replacing the process, it is possible to increase the wireless capacity as well as reducing the deterioration rate.
- the wireless parameter it is possible to obtain the wireless parameter to be improved not only in the whole area but also in the important area of the communication service quality of the deterioration rate and the wireless capacity.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a tilt angle determination device according to a second embodiment of the present invention.
- the second embodiment corresponds to the processing in which the whole area and the important area in the first embodiment are replaced.
- the first embodiment first performs processing to reduce the deterioration rate of all areas, and later satisfies the restriction conditions of the deterioration rates of all areas. While the process of reducing the degradation rate of the important area is performed, the order is changed to reduce the important area first, and later the constraint conditions of the degradation rate of the important area are satisfied, and the entire area is It is an apparatus that performs processing to reduce the deterioration rate.
- the means 21 for inputting the initial tilt angle of the antenna receives an input of the initial tilt angle from the user of the wireless network design tool. Then, the initial tilt angle is supplied to the first tilt angle determination means 22 for reducing the deterioration rate of the important area.
- the first tilt angle determination means 22 for reducing the degradation rate of the important area determines the tilt angle at which the degradation rate of the important area is smaller than that at the initial value, using the initial tilt angle as the initial value.
- the angle is supplied to the second tilt angle determining means 25 for reducing the deterioration rate of the entire area.
- the method of determining the degradation rate force and the tilt angle to be made is the same as in the first embodiment.
- the first tilt angle determination means 22 for reducing the deterioration rate of the important area simultaneously supplies the restriction rate setting means 24 with the deterioration rate of the important area at the tilt angle after the first tilt angle is determined.
- the increase allowable parameter input means 23 based on the deterioration rate of the important area after the first tilt angle is determined is the deterioration rate of the important area after the first tilt angle is determined from the person using the wireless network design tool. Accept input of increase allowable parameter based on. Then, the increase allowance parameter input means 23 supplies the increase allowance parameter to the constraint condition setting means 24.
- Constraint setting means 24 is based on the deterioration rate of the important area after determining the first tilt angle.
- the second tilt angle determining means 25 which reduces the degradation rate of the whole area using the rate is supplied with the constraint condition on the degradation rate of the important area.
- the second tilt angle determining means 25 for reducing the rate of degradation of the entire area takes the tilt angle after the determination of the first tilt angle as an initial value and further satisfies the constraint condition on the rate of degradation of the important area, (1) A tilt angle at which the deterioration rate of the whole area is smaller than that at the tilt angle after determining the tilt angle is determined, and the tilt angle is output to the outside as the tilt angle after the second tilt angle is determined.
- the method of determining the tilt angle at which the deterioration rate used by the second tilt angle determining means is reduced is the same as that of the first embodiment.
- the second tilt angle determination means 15 for reducing the deterioration rate of the entire area externally outputs the deterioration rate of the entire area at the tilt angle after the determination of the second tilt angle and the deterioration rate of the important area.
- the configuration of the first tilt angle determination means 22 in the second embodiment is the same as that of the first tilt angle determination means 12 in the first embodiment.
- the first weighted value of all the areas and the important area input to the weighted sum calculation means 110 of the deterioration rate by the weighted value of the important area is set as all area 0 and important area 1.
- the configuration and operation of the second tilt angle determination means 25 in the second embodiment are the same as the configuration and operation of the second tilt angle determination means 15 in the first embodiment. However, it is performed when the second area weighting value of all areas and the important area input to the weighted sum calculation means 110 of the deterioration rate by the weighting value of the important area is all area 1 and important area 0.
- FIG. 5a and FIG. 5b are flowcharts showing processing operations in the present embodiment.
- FIG. 5a and FIG. 5b are the same as the flowchart of FIG. 3 described in the first embodiment. Basically the same force as Yat The following steps are different.
- step S2 The step of calculating the deterioration rate Pb of the whole area (step S2) is replaced with the step of calculating the deterioration rate Pa of the force important area (step S52).
- step S5 The step of calculating the deterioration rate Pb of the whole area (step S5) is replaced with the step of calculating the deterioration rate Pa of the force important area (step S55).
- Step S14 Step of Calculating Deterioration Rate Pa of Important Area
- Step S64 Step of Calculating Deterioration Rate Pb of all areas
- the operation in the present embodiment is basically the same as that in the first embodiment except that the processing of the above-described replaced steps is different.
- the first embodiment first performs the process of reducing the deterioration rate of the entire area, and using the result, the deterioration rate of the important area is determined later.
- the process to reduce the degradation rate of the important area is performed first, and the process to reduce the degradation rate of all the areas later is applied using the result.
- constraints are imposed such that the rate of deterioration in important areas is too high.
- the process of reducing the deterioration rate of the important area which is performed only by the process of reducing the deterioration rate of all the areas, is included. Therefore, it is more important than the conventional method which can reduce only the degradation rate of the whole area. The deterioration rate of the rear can be reduced.
- the process of reducing the deterioration rate of the important area is first performed, and the process of reducing the deterioration rate of all the areas is performed using the result, and the deterioration rates of all areas are
- the restriction condition is applied so that the deterioration rate of the important area is reduced, that is, the importance area is fixed while suppressing the increase of the deterioration rate of the important area.
- the rate of deterioration of the entire area can be reduced while keeping the value of. That is, according to the present embodiment, not only the deterioration rate of the entire area can be reduced but also the inferiority / J of the important area can be improved.
- the ground height and antenna force of the antenna are also transmitted from the antenna tilt angle to be updated. Even if it is replaced with the transmission power of the pilot channel, it can be implemented similarly without losing the generality of the radio parameter determination device of the present invention. Specific replacement is the same as the replacement described in the first embodiment.
- the objective function is replaced by the wireless capacity from the deterioration rate. Since the process for reducing the deterioration rate is only replaced with the process for increasing the wireless capacity, the generality of the method for determining a tilt angle according to the present invention is not lost. That is, in the second embodiment, instead of reducing the rate of deterioration, processing may be replaced by increasing the wireless capacity, and the wireless capacity may be increased as in the case of decreasing the rate of deterioration. It can be implemented.
- the wireless parameter it is possible to obtain the wireless parameter to be improved not only in the whole area but also in the important area of the communication service quality of the deterioration rate and the wireless capacity.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a tilt angle determination device according to a third embodiment of the present invention.
- the third embodiment has a form in which the intermediate operation between the first embodiment and the second embodiment can be continuously realized by weight value.
- the weights are first Perform processing to reduce the degradation rate of important areas and all areas by bid value, and later reduce processing of degradation rates of important areas and all areas by different weighting values. This is performed by adjusting the ratio of the process of decreasing the degradation rate of the important area first and the process of reducing the degradation rate of the important area later to reduce the degradation rate of the important area and not the entire area. Hit.
- the means 31 for inputting the initial tilt angle of the antenna receives an input of the initial tilt angle from the user of the wireless network design tool. Then, the initial tilt angle is supplied to the first tilt angle determination means 32 for reducing the weighted sum of the deterioration rates of the important area and the entire area by the first weighting value.
- the first weight value input means 36 for the important area and all areas receives the input of the first weight values of the important area and all areas from the person using the wireless network design tool. Then, the first tile angle determining means 32 for reducing the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the important area and the entire area by the first weighting value, and the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the important area and the entire area by the second weighting value is small. The first weight value of the important area and the whole area is supplied to the second tilt angle determining means 35.
- the first tilt angle determining means 32 for reducing the weighted sum of the deterioration rates of the important area and the entire area by the first weighting value takes the initial tilt angle as an initial value, and uses the first weighting value more than the initial value.
- the method of determining the tilt angle in which the weighted sum of the deterioration rates is reduced is the same as that of the first embodiment.
- the first tilt angle determination means 32 for reducing the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the two sets constraints on the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the important area and the entire area by the first weighting value at the tilt angle after the first tilt angle determination. Means 34 is supplied.
- the increase allowance parameter input means 33 based on the weighted sum of the important area and the deterioration area of the whole area by the first weighting value after the first tilt angle is determined is the first one from the person using the wireless network design tool. Accept the input of the increase allowable parameter based on the weighted sum of the degradation rate of the important area and all areas by the first weighting value after the tilt angle is determined. Then, the increase allowance parameter input means 33 supplies the increase allowance parameter to the constraint setting means 34.
- Constraint condition setting means 34 is an increase allowable parameter from increase allowable parameter input means 33 based on the weighted sum of the deterioration rates of the important area and the entire area according to the first weighting value after the first tilt angle is determined, A second tilt angle that reduces the weighted sum of degradation rates of the important area and all areas by the second weighting value using the weighted sum of degradation rates of the important area and all areas by the first weighting value after determining the first tilt angle
- the determination means 35 is supplied with the constraints on the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the important area and the entire area by the first weighting value.
- the second weight value input means of the important area and the entire area receives the input of the second weight value of the important area different from the first weight value and the second area from the person using the wireless network design tool.
- the second tilt angle determining means 35 for reducing the weighted sum of the deterioration rates of the important area and the entire area by the second weighting value further uses the tilt angle after the first tilt angle is determined as the initial value and further uses the first weighting value.
- the weighted sum of the important area and all area deterioration rates by the second weighting value is larger than the tilt angle after the first tilt angle determination while satisfying the restriction condition on the weighted sum of the important area and all area deterioration rates.
- the tilt angle which becomes smaller is obtained, and the tilt angle is output to the outside as the tilt angle after the second tilt angle is determined.
- the method of determining the tilt angle at which the deterioration rate is decreased, which is used by the second tilt angle determining means, is the same as that of the first embodiment.
- the second tilt angle determining means 35 for reducing the weighted sum of the deterioration rates of the important area and the whole area by the second weighting value is the second area with the important area by the second weighting value at the tilt angle after the second tilt angle is determined. Output the weighted sum of degradation rates of all areas and the weighted sum of degradation rates of important areas and all areas by the first weighting value.
- the configuration and operation of the first tilt angle determination means 32 in the third embodiment are the same as the configuration and operation of the first tilt angle determination means 12 in the first embodiment.
- the configuration and operation of the second tilt angle determination means 35 in the third embodiment are the same as the configuration and operation of the second tilt angle determination means 15 in the first embodiment.
- FIGS. 7a and 7b are flowcharts showing the processing operation of the present embodiment.
- FIGS. 7a and 7b are basically the same as the flowchart shown in FIG. 3 described in the first embodiment, except for the following steps.
- Step of setting PI current Pb (step S3)
- Plcurrent wla-Pa + wl b ⁇ Replaced with step of setting Pb (step S 103)! /.
- step S 120 Replaced with the step of setting Pb (step S 120).
- Step S201 Step of setting the weight value wla of the important area and the weight value wlb of all the areas as the first weight value of the important area and all areas (step S201) and calculating the deterioration rate Pa of the important area (step S52 )But,
- step S1 It is added between the step of setting the initial tilt angle (step S1) and the step of calculating the deterioration rate Pb of the whole area (step S2).
- the step of calculating the deterioration rate Pa of the important area is between the step of temporarily updating the tilt angle (step S4) and the step of calculating the deterioration rate Pb of all the areas (step S5). I am being scolded.
- the operation in the processing flow is basically the same as that of the first embodiment except that the processing of the above-described replaced step is different.
- a process is performed to reduce the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the important area and the entire area by the first weighting value, and the result is used later to differ from the first weighting value.
- the restriction condition is set so that the weighted sum of the deterioration areas of the important area and all areas by the first weighting value does not become too large.
- the present embodiment is a process in which the objective function is to reduce the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the important area and the entire area by the weighting values, and the degradation rates of the two different weighting values are in order. Processing to reduce the weighted sum of The process of reducing the weighted sum of degradation rates to be applied later is performed by adding constraints to the weighted sum of degradation rates obtained earlier. This is to realize an intermediate form of the first embodiment and the second embodiment continuously by changing the weighting value.
- the degradation rate of the important area is given first.
- the present embodiment repeats the same process for reducing the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the important area and all areas twice. So it is equivalent to giving one treatment. Therefore, the effect of reducing the degradation rate of the important area is the same as in the case of a single treatment.
- the present embodiment includes, similarly to the first embodiment, the processing for reducing the deterioration rate of the important area only by the processing for reducing the deterioration rate of all the areas. Therefore, the degradation rate of important areas can be reduced compared to the conventional method in which only the degradation rate of all areas can be reduced.
- a process is first performed to reduce the weighted sum of degradation rates of the important area and the entire area by the first weighting value, and using the result, the first weighting value is different from the first weighting value.
- a process is performed to reduce the weighted sum of degradation rates of the important area and the entire area by the two weighting values, and in the process of reducing the degradation rates of the important area and the all areas by the second weighting value, the first weighting value is used. Because the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the important area and the entire area is too large, it is restricted as such, so that the weighted sum of the degradation rates of the important area and the entire area by the first weighting value is suppressed to be large. However, the degradation rate of the important area and the whole area can be reduced by the second weighting value.
- the first weighting value and the second weighting value By adjusting the first weighting value and the second weighting value, an intermediate process between the first embodiment and the second embodiment can be realized. That is, by adjusting the first weighting value and the second weighting value, the ratio of the process of decreasing the deterioration rate of the important area first and the process of decreasing the deterioration rate of the important area later are adjusted, The degradation rates of the area and the important area can be reduced in a well-balanced manner.
- the ground height and antenna force of the antenna are also transmitted from the antenna tilt angle to be updated. Even if it is replaced with the transmission power of the pilot channel, it can be implemented similarly without losing the generality of the radio parameter determination device of the present invention. Specific replacement is the same as the replacement described in the first embodiment.
- the objective function is determined based on the deterioration rate. Because the process of reducing the degradation rate is replaced by the process of increasing the wireless capacity, the generality of the method for determining a tilt angle according to the present invention is not lost.
- processing is replaced by increasing the wireless capacity, and as in the case of decreasing the rate of deterioration, the wireless capacity is increased. It can be implemented.
- the wireless parameter it is possible to obtain the wireless parameter to be improved not only in the whole area but also in the important area as well as the communication service quality factor of the deterioration rate and the wireless capacity.
- a wireless parameter can be obtained in which the degradation rate and the communication service quality of wireless capacity can be improved not only in the entire area but also in the important area. It has the effect of
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN2006800300813A CN101243710B (zh) | 2005-08-16 | 2006-05-26 | 无线通信系统的无线电参数确定方法和装置 |
JP2007530917A JP4946866B2 (ja) | 2005-08-16 | 2006-05-26 | 無線通信システムの無線パラメータ決定方法および装置 |
US11/989,750 US8112089B2 (en) | 2005-08-16 | 2006-05-26 | Radio parameter determination method and device for a radio communication system |
GB0804710A GB2443781B (en) | 2005-08-16 | 2008-03-13 | Radio parameter determination method and device for a radio communication system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2005235945 | 2005-08-16 | ||
JP2005-235945 | 2005-08-16 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2007020737A1 true WO2007020737A1 (ja) | 2007-02-22 |
Family
ID=37757406
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2006/310530 WO2007020737A1 (ja) | 2005-08-16 | 2006-05-26 | 無線通信システムの無線パラメータ決定方法および装置 |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8112089B2 (ja) |
JP (1) | JP4946866B2 (ja) |
CN (1) | CN101243710B (ja) |
GB (1) | GB2443781B (ja) |
WO (1) | WO2007020737A1 (ja) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2008227747A (ja) * | 2007-03-09 | 2008-09-25 | Ntt Docomo Inc | 移動通信システムにおける基地局アンテナ放射パターン制御方法及びそのシステム |
WO2011081042A1 (ja) * | 2010-01-04 | 2011-07-07 | 日本電気株式会社 | 省電力運用支援装置、省電力運用支援方法、記録媒体、および基地局 |
JP2011244389A (ja) * | 2010-05-21 | 2011-12-01 | Fujitsu Ltd | 無線基地局、無線パラメータの調整方法 |
JP5668754B2 (ja) * | 2010-05-31 | 2015-02-12 | 富士通株式会社 | 通信装置 |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2974699B1 (fr) * | 2011-04-29 | 2013-06-14 | Mentum | Procede d'optimisation de la qualite d'un reseau cellulaire |
EP2708071A1 (en) * | 2011-05-12 | 2014-03-19 | Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy | Saving energy in muliti - rat communication network |
CN102984714B (zh) * | 2012-12-07 | 2016-08-03 | 国家广播电影电视总局广播科学研究院 | 一种基于无线广播式覆盖数据的区域检测方法和设备 |
US9942777B1 (en) | 2016-12-30 | 2018-04-10 | T-Mobile Usa, Inc. | Optimizing coverage of infrastructure equipment utilizing network density information |
US9986443B1 (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2018-05-29 | T-Mobile Usa, Inc. | Optimizing coverage of infrastructure equipment |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2001203631A (ja) * | 1999-11-04 | 2001-07-27 | Lucent Technol Inc | ワイヤレスネットワークの性能を特徴づける方法 |
WO2004043096A2 (de) * | 2002-11-06 | 2004-05-21 | Vodafone Holding Gmbh | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur optimierung von zellularen drahtlosen nachrichtennetzen |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH09154168A (ja) | 1995-11-30 | 1997-06-10 | Kyocera Corp | 無線基地局のサービスエリア可変システム |
JPH09298766A (ja) | 1996-04-30 | 1997-11-18 | Nec Eng Ltd | 移動通信システム |
JPH10112681A (ja) | 1996-10-07 | 1998-04-28 | Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd | 基地局 |
US6405043B1 (en) * | 1997-07-02 | 2002-06-11 | Scoreboard, Inc. | Method to characterize the prospective or actual level of interference at a point, in a sector, and throughout a cellular system |
US6842431B2 (en) | 1999-11-04 | 2005-01-11 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Methods and apparatus for characterization, adjustment and optimization of wireless networks |
JP4737417B2 (ja) * | 2003-06-16 | 2011-08-03 | 日本電気株式会社 | 無線ネットワーク変更支援システム及び無線ネットワーク変更支援方法 |
US7099670B2 (en) * | 2003-06-17 | 2006-08-29 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for design of wireless networks to aid in location identification of mobile units |
JP4100304B2 (ja) * | 2003-09-10 | 2008-06-11 | 株式会社日立製作所 | 無線通信システム及びその復調方法並びにデータレート制御方法 |
-
2006
- 2006-05-26 WO PCT/JP2006/310530 patent/WO2007020737A1/ja active Application Filing
- 2006-05-26 CN CN2006800300813A patent/CN101243710B/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-05-26 JP JP2007530917A patent/JP4946866B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-05-26 US US11/989,750 patent/US8112089B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2008
- 2008-03-13 GB GB0804710A patent/GB2443781B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2001203631A (ja) * | 1999-11-04 | 2001-07-27 | Lucent Technol Inc | ワイヤレスネットワークの性能を特徴づける方法 |
WO2004043096A2 (de) * | 2002-11-06 | 2004-05-21 | Vodafone Holding Gmbh | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur optimierung von zellularen drahtlosen nachrichtennetzen |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2008227747A (ja) * | 2007-03-09 | 2008-09-25 | Ntt Docomo Inc | 移動通信システムにおける基地局アンテナ放射パターン制御方法及びそのシステム |
WO2011081042A1 (ja) * | 2010-01-04 | 2011-07-07 | 日本電気株式会社 | 省電力運用支援装置、省電力運用支援方法、記録媒体、および基地局 |
JP5962013B2 (ja) * | 2010-01-04 | 2016-08-03 | 日本電気株式会社 | 省電力運用支援装置、省電力運用支援方法、記録媒体、および基地局 |
US9622169B2 (en) | 2010-01-04 | 2017-04-11 | Nec Corporation | Power-save operation supporting apparatus, power-save operation supporting method, storage medium and base station |
JP2011244389A (ja) * | 2010-05-21 | 2011-12-01 | Fujitsu Ltd | 無線基地局、無線パラメータの調整方法 |
US8965384B2 (en) | 2010-05-21 | 2015-02-24 | Fujitsu, Limited | Base station and radio parameter-adjustment method |
JP5668754B2 (ja) * | 2010-05-31 | 2015-02-12 | 富士通株式会社 | 通信装置 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2443781B (en) | 2010-02-10 |
US8112089B2 (en) | 2012-02-07 |
GB0804710D0 (en) | 2008-04-23 |
CN101243710B (zh) | 2011-10-12 |
CN101243710A (zh) | 2008-08-13 |
JP4946866B2 (ja) | 2012-06-06 |
GB2443781A (en) | 2008-05-14 |
US20100105372A1 (en) | 2010-04-29 |
JPWO2007020737A1 (ja) | 2009-02-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2007020737A1 (ja) | 無線通信システムの無線パラメータ決定方法および装置 | |
JP4106570B2 (ja) | 無線通信システムにおけるアンテナのチルト角決定方法、およびチルト角決定装置 | |
JP4602552B2 (ja) | ワイヤレス通信システムにおいてチャネル・パワーを調整する方法 | |
US8150413B2 (en) | Radio network designing apparatus and method | |
US6141565A (en) | Dynamic mobile parameter optimization | |
CN100574488C (zh) | 配置通信网络的方法、相关网络结构及其计算机程序产品 | |
TW439385B (en) | Adaptive handoff hysteresis in wireless telecommunication networks | |
US7142523B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for design, adjustment or operation of wireless networks using pre-frequency-assignment optimization | |
JP2000091988A (ja) | 基地局送信パワ―レベルを設定する方法 | |
US6925066B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for design, adjustment or operation of wireless networks using multi-stage optimization | |
JP2001308782A (ja) | 無線通信システムのアンテナ傾斜角動的制御方法 | |
KR20100079433A (ko) | 기지국의 위치를 결정하는 장치 및 방법 | |
El-Kadi et al. | Predictive resource allocation in multimedia satellite networks | |
US7593734B2 (en) | Method and an apparatus for cell planning | |
KR100546481B1 (ko) | 이동통신망의 기지국 안테나 최적화 방법 | |
JP2001251137A (ja) | デュアルカバー区域グリッド方法 | |
KR100970221B1 (ko) | 무선 통신 네트워크의 최적 설계 시스템 및 그 방법 | |
KR100493105B1 (ko) | 가정용 무선 통신 안테나 설치 방법 | |
US8055265B2 (en) | Method and system for selecting radiation diagrams of antennas for mobile-radio communication networks | |
Choi et al. | Exploiting path/location information for connection admission control in cellular networks | |
KR20100127394A (ko) | 이동 통신망 재설계 방법 및 장치 | |
GB2442153A (en) | Method and apparatus for deciding tilt angles of antennas in a radio communication system | |
KR101850776B1 (ko) | 릴레이 네트워크에서의 릴레이 위치 선정 방법 | |
WO2008000293A1 (en) | Method and system for configuring a communicaton network, related network and computer program product | |
Boyer et al. | An iterative heuristic algorithm for applied channel assignment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200680030081.3 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 11989750 Country of ref document: US |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2007530917 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 0804710 Country of ref document: GB Kind code of ref document: A Free format text: PCT FILING DATE = 20060526 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 0804710.2 Country of ref document: GB |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 06756630 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |