[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2004007106A1 - A method for strategically locating gas extraction points - Google Patents

A method for strategically locating gas extraction points Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004007106A1
WO2004007106A1 PCT/AU2003/000647 AU0300647W WO2004007106A1 WO 2004007106 A1 WO2004007106 A1 WO 2004007106A1 AU 0300647 W AU0300647 W AU 0300647W WO 2004007106 A1 WO2004007106 A1 WO 2004007106A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
zones
landfill
surface temperature
gas
elevated surface
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/AU2003/000647
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jason Scarborough
Original Assignee
Renewable Australia Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Renewable Australia Pty Ltd filed Critical Renewable Australia Pty Ltd
Priority to AU2003229103A priority Critical patent/AU2003229103B2/en
Publication of WO2004007106A1 publication Critical patent/WO2004007106A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B09DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09CRECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09C1/00Reclamation of contaminated soil
    • B09C1/005Extraction of vapours or gases using vacuum or venting
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B09DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09BDISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B09B1/00Dumping solid waste
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B09DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09BDISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B09B1/00Dumping solid waste
    • B09B1/006Shafts or wells in waste dumps
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B09DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09CRECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09C1/00Reclamation of contaminated soil
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N25/00Investigating or analyzing materials by the use of thermal means
    • G01N25/72Investigating presence of flaws
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/02Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating impedance
    • G01N27/04Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating impedance by investigating resistance
    • G01N27/043Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating impedance by investigating resistance of a granular material

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the extraction of gas from a substance and, in particular, to strategically locating optimum gas extraction points in a landfill.
  • Gas is primarily generated in landfills by the anaerobic decomposition of organic matter. This includes gas produced by material that decomposes rapidly (such as food, paper and lawn clippings) or slowly (such as rubber, wood and textiles).
  • Methane is the main gas produced in a landfill and constitutes approximately half of the total landfill gas generated. It is also a potential explosion and/or fire risk and has a substantial calorific value and therefore potential to be utilised as a fuel source. Methane generated from landfill typically constitutes greater than 90 percent of methane emissions from developed countries' waste management activities. In the European Union and the United States, emissions from landfills are the largest anthropogenic sources of methane.
  • landfill gas Whether a landfill gas is captured or emitted will depend upon the compaction rate of waste in the landfill.
  • a typical landfill operating in the 1970's would achieve compactions ranging between 130 kg per cubic metre (uncompacted) to 500 kg per cubic metre (well compacted).
  • waste compaction rates commonly exceed 1000 kg per cubic metre.
  • landfills these days are not simply "filling a hole" with significant use of landfill cells with specialised waste lift heights, filling sequences, designated areas for particular types of waste and techniques to maximise compaction. Accordingly, a denser layer of waste is commonly landfilled over poorly to moderately compacted waste, creating greater resistance for the upward movement of gas.
  • landfill gas migrates via the path of least resistance around any barriers.
  • deeper landfills that have a proportionally larger anaerobic zone and greater insulation are more likely to imprison gas produced within the landfill.
  • LGES Landfill Gas Extraction Systems
  • a method for strategically locating gas extraction points within a landfill area including the steps of: conducting a thermal infrared scan of the landfill area to identify zones of elevated surface temperature; recording data indicative of said zones of elevated surface temperature; conducting an electrical resistivity survey of the landfill area to identify zones of low resistivity; recording data indicative of said zones of low resistivity; processing the data so as to identify locations having zones of low resistivity and elevated surface temperature, which locations are to have said extraction points.
  • the electrical resistivity survey is only conducted in said zones of elevated surface temperature.
  • the thermal infrared scan is conducted during a time period just prior to dawn.
  • said method includes further processing the data so as to identify locations having zones of continuous resistivity linking areas of low resistivity and elevated surface temperature indicating a high probability of being a gas migration pathway.
  • said method includes further processing the data so as to identify locations having zones of high resistivity and elevated surface temperature indicating a high probability of being a gas confining layer.
  • said method further includes locating a gas extraction well at an identified location being a high gas yielding area.
  • said method can be applied to any type of landfill area.
  • Figure 1 is an example of a known Landfill Gas Extraction System
  • Figure 2 is a site map of a landfill area surveyed by the method of an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 1 shows a known landfill gas extraction system (LGES).
  • LGES landfill gas extraction system
  • An LGES system is retrofitted to an established landfill, and a systematic method of installing the extraction wells is used. For example, a grid pattern with spacing between wells ranging from 45 metres to 60 metres. The system will generally cover the majority of the landfill area and this system is only acceptable for landfill areas where the compaction and types of waste landfill are uniform, and mixed thoroughly enough to avoid creating significant anomalies in the fill material. This system is also not applicable to landfills that have been established for sometime. As these wells are placed in a grid like arrangement, many wells usually produce no or very little gas. Further, as the drilling of each of the holes is drilled "blind" through the landfill, significant risks mainly from a safety and drilling equipment damage perspective are present.
  • FIG. 2 shows an example landfill surveyed using the method of the present invention to locate the optimum gas extraction points and thus high gas yielding areas.
  • the site map shown is of a known existing landfill having a landfill area of approximately 125,000 square metres, an average depth of waste fill of 16 metres and approximately 20 to 25 years old.
  • BH1, BH2 and BH3 were identified by the method and drilled in the locations identified.
  • BH4 was identified by the method, but the actual location was 5m west of the identified location due to access constraints.
  • the location of BH5 was selected at random. Testing at atmospheric pressure indicated gas flows 3.5 to 5.5 times higher in BH1, BH2, and BH3 when compared to BH5.
  • BH4 yielded 20 times less gas than BH5. If the LGES was used on such a landfill up to 35 drill extraction wells would be required to service the site as a systematic method would be used and as indicated, the majority would have been unproductive. Accordingly, significant cost benefits can be seen from use of the method of the invention.
  • the general method used to obtain the results of Figure 2 for strategically locating gas extraction points within a landfill area includes the following steps:
  • an electrical current must be injected into the ground by a pair of electrodes.
  • the potential field (or voltage) is then measured at the surface between a second pair of electrodes. If the distance and geometry between the electrode positions is known, along with the applied current and the measured voltage, the sub-surface resistivity can be calculated.
  • Resistivity was used because it gives the ability to determine the depth of waste fill, the ability to identify wet/perched leachate areas (moisture is required for the production of landfill gas), the potential to locate low density areas in the waste fill, the potential to locate large, homogenous units, and the relatively large body of data produced.
  • Resistivity methods have the added advantages of being relatively inexpensive, having a high resolution and ease of interpretation of the data.
  • the electrical resistivity survey would only be conducted in the zones of elevated surface temperature. Resistivity surveys could be used using two-dimensional or three-dimensional methods.
  • thermal infrared scans should be taken at the period pre-dawn to dawn because the expected variations in surface temperature were expected to be minor (few degrees Celsius).
  • the addition of a solar load could potentially mask the small variations and reduce the possibility of detecting "hot spots" on objects near the surface of the landfill that store or conduct heat.
  • landfill gas from organic matter generates heat as one of the products. Deeper landfills have proportionally greater insulation than shallow landfills.
  • areas of elevated surface temperature indicate a near surface area of landfill gas generation, a deeper and more active area of landfill gas generation, a vent or near surface reservoir of landfill gas, some other heat storing/conducting at or near the surface.
  • the method further includes locating a gas extraction well at each of the locations of high gas yield.
  • the present invention at least in a preferred embodiment has significant advantages/features over the LGES system. These advantages are for example, (a) improves the overall efficiency of a landfill gas extraction system; (b) reduces the total number of landfill gas extraction points required to service a landfill; (c) considering (a) and (b), the installation of a landfill gas extraction system becomes financially viable at smaller landfills; (d) considering (c), the generation of increased quantities of renewable energy becomes possible; (e) also considering (c), the combustion of landfill gas reduces overall greenhouse gas emissions from a landfill site; (f) again considering (c), smaller landfills can pro-actively manage risks posed by landfill gas; and (g) this invention can improve the safety and efficiency of the drilling process to install landfill gas extraction points.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Soil Sciences (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)

Abstract

A method for strategically locating gas extraction points within a landfill area; said method including the steps of: conducting a thermal infrared scan of the landfill area to identify zones of elevated surface temperature; recording data indicative of said zones of elevated surface temperature; conducting an electrical resistivity survey of the landfill area to identify zones of low, continuous and/or high resistivity; processing said data and identifying locations having a high probability of being high gas yielding areas.

Description

A Method For Strategically Locating Gas Extraction Points
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the extraction of gas from a substance and, in particular, to strategically locating optimum gas extraction points in a landfill.
Background of the Invention
There is a long established practice to deposit rubbish and excess matter of growing cities in landfills. In an attempt to achieve a beneficial end use for landfills once they are full, it is common to turn those landfills into parks and ovals for use by the public. The rubbish and/or excess matter in such landfills decomposes and gas is created. This can lead to the emission of offensive odours and the risk of fire and/or explosion.
Gas is primarily generated in landfills by the anaerobic decomposition of organic matter. This includes gas produced by material that decomposes rapidly (such as food, paper and lawn clippings) or slowly (such as rubber, wood and textiles).
Methane is the main gas produced in a landfill and constitutes approximately half of the total landfill gas generated. It is also a potential explosion and/or fire risk and has a substantial calorific value and therefore potential to be utilised as a fuel source. Methane generated from landfill typically constitutes greater than 90 percent of methane emissions from developed countries' waste management activities. In the European Union and the United States, emissions from landfills are the largest anthropogenic sources of methane.
Whether a landfill gas is captured or emitted will depend upon the compaction rate of waste in the landfill. A typical landfill operating in the 1970's would achieve compactions ranging between 130 kg per cubic metre (uncompacted) to 500 kg per cubic metre (well compacted). In recent years, with a need to maximise landfill volume, waste compaction rates commonly exceed 1000 kg per cubic metre. Also, landfills these days are not simply "filling a hole" with significant use of landfill cells with specialised waste lift heights, filling sequences, designated areas for particular types of waste and techniques to maximise compaction. Accordingly, a denser layer of waste is commonly landfilled over poorly to moderately compacted waste, creating greater resistance for the upward movement of gas. In addition, improved waste covering regimes contribute significantly to resistance to the virtual migration of landfill gas. In such systems, the landfill gas migrates via the path of least resistance around any barriers. Also, deeper landfills, that have a proportionally larger anaerobic zone and greater insulation are more likely to imprison gas produced within the landfill.
In an attempt to reduce greenhouse gas emission and to utilise the gas created in landfills, a system has been developed to extract gas from landfills. This system referred to as Landfill Gas Extraction Systems (LGES) and, as shown in Figure 1, can be retrofitted to an established landfill and includes installing many extraction wells in an evenly spaced grid pattern consistently across the entire landfill. This method is suitable only for landfill sites where the compaction and the types of waste landfilled are uniform, and mixed thoroughly enough to avoid creating significant anomalies in the fill material. Also, this method is not effective for landfills that have been established for some time (for example, 20 years). Further disadvantages of the above system, are that the costs are significant, the waste heterogeneity can give rise to drilling hazards (car bodies, tree stumps, concrete etc), additional drilling and installation costs, by the use of a large number of drill sites and that certain zones in the landfill may not produce any gas. Still further, most landfills have established environmental and operational management systems and the addition of the LGES system usually results in significant changes to that system which again increases costs.
Accordingly, there is a need to accurately locate points within any type of landfill where landfill gas can be extracted at a higher efficiency rate and lower cost than current methods. There is also a need to identify landfill gas migration pathways out of landfill sites having occupational health and safety and public risk implications.
Object of the Invention
It is an object of the present invention to overcome or ameliorate some of the disadvantages of the prior art, or at least to provide a useful alternative. Summary of the Invention
There is disclosed herein a method for strategically locating gas extraction points within a landfill area; said method including the steps of: conducting a thermal infrared scan of the landfill area to identify zones of elevated surface temperature; recording data indicative of said zones of elevated surface temperature; conducting an electrical resistivity survey of the landfill area to identify zones of low resistivity; recording data indicative of said zones of low resistivity; processing the data so as to identify locations having zones of low resistivity and elevated surface temperature, which locations are to have said extraction points.
Preferably, the electrical resistivity survey is only conducted in said zones of elevated surface temperature.
Preferably, the thermal infrared scan is conducted during a time period just prior to dawn.
Preferably, said method includes further processing the data so as to identify locations having zones of continuous resistivity linking areas of low resistivity and elevated surface temperature indicating a high probability of being a gas migration pathway.
Preferably, said method includes further processing the data so as to identify locations having zones of high resistivity and elevated surface temperature indicating a high probability of being a gas confining layer.
Preferably, said method further includes locating a gas extraction well at an identified location being a high gas yielding area.
Preferably, said method can be applied to any type of landfill area. Brief Description of the Drawings
A preferred form of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein:
Figure 1 is an example of a known Landfill Gas Extraction System; and
Figure 2 is a site map of a landfill area surveyed by the method of an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
As previously mentioned, Figure 1 shows a known landfill gas extraction system (LGES). An LGES system is retrofitted to an established landfill, and a systematic method of installing the extraction wells is used. For example, a grid pattern with spacing between wells ranging from 45 metres to 60 metres. The system will generally cover the majority of the landfill area and this system is only acceptable for landfill areas where the compaction and types of waste landfill are uniform, and mixed thoroughly enough to avoid creating significant anomalies in the fill material. This system is also not applicable to landfills that have been established for sometime. As these wells are placed in a grid like arrangement, many wells usually produce no or very little gas. Further, as the drilling of each of the holes is drilled "blind" through the landfill, significant risks mainly from a safety and drilling equipment damage perspective are present.
Figure 2, shows an example landfill surveyed using the method of the present invention to locate the optimum gas extraction points and thus high gas yielding areas. The site map shown is of a known existing landfill having a landfill area of approximately 125,000 square metres, an average depth of waste fill of 16 metres and approximately 20 to 25 years old. Of the five borehole locations, BH1, BH2 and BH3 were identified by the method and drilled in the locations identified. BH4 was identified by the method, but the actual location was 5m west of the identified location due to access constraints. The location of BH5 was selected at random. Testing at atmospheric pressure indicated gas flows 3.5 to 5.5 times higher in BH1, BH2, and BH3 when compared to BH5. BH4 yielded 20 times less gas than BH5. If the LGES was used on such a landfill up to 35 drill extraction wells would be required to service the site as a systematic method would be used and as indicated, the majority would have been unproductive. Accordingly, significant cost benefits can be seen from use of the method of the invention.
The general method used to obtain the results of Figure 2 for strategically locating gas extraction points within a landfill area includes the following steps:
1. Conducting a thermal infrared scan of the landfill area to identify zones of elevated surface temperature.
2. Recording data indicative of the zones of elevated surface temperature.
3. Conducting an electrical resistivity survey of the landfill area to identify zones of low, continuous and/or high resistivity.
4. Recording data indicative of the zones of low, continuous and/or high resistivity.
5. Processing the data and identifying locations having a high probability of being high gas yielding areas.
Further testing such as metal detection, electromagnetic, seismic, gravity, ground penetrating radar or magnetic could also be used to add further data to the method. Direct measurement of the surface temperature could also be conducted.
To undertake a resistivity investigation, an electrical current must be injected into the ground by a pair of electrodes. The potential field (or voltage) is then measured at the surface between a second pair of electrodes. If the distance and geometry between the electrode positions is known, along with the applied current and the measured voltage, the sub-surface resistivity can be calculated.
Resistivity was used because it gives the ability to determine the depth of waste fill, the ability to identify wet/perched leachate areas (moisture is required for the production of landfill gas), the potential to locate low density areas in the waste fill, the potential to locate large, homogenous units, and the relatively large body of data produced. Resistivity methods have the added advantages of being relatively inexpensive, having a high resolution and ease of interpretation of the data. In a preferred method, the electrical resistivity survey would only be conducted in the zones of elevated surface temperature. Resistivity surveys could be used using two-dimensional or three-dimensional methods.
It was found by the applicant that the thermal infrared scans should be taken at the period pre-dawn to dawn because the expected variations in surface temperature were expected to be minor (few degrees Celsius). The addition of a solar load could potentially mask the small variations and reduce the possibility of detecting "hot spots" on objects near the surface of the landfill that store or conduct heat.
The generation of landfill gas from organic matter generates heat as one of the products. Deeper landfills have proportionally greater insulation than shallow landfills.
Thus, areas of elevated surface temperature indicate a near surface area of landfill gas generation, a deeper and more active area of landfill gas generation, a vent or near surface reservoir of landfill gas, some other heat storing/conducting at or near the surface.
The method further includes locating a gas extraction well at each of the locations of high gas yield.
It has been found in the testing conducted by the Applicant that if gas extraction wells are not located accurately, a significant impact on the possibility of finding a high or very poor yielding point results.
Accordingly, the present invention at least in a preferred embodiment has significant advantages/features over the LGES system. These advantages are for example, (a) improves the overall efficiency of a landfill gas extraction system; (b) reduces the total number of landfill gas extraction points required to service a landfill; (c) considering (a) and (b), the installation of a landfill gas extraction system becomes financially viable at smaller landfills; (d) considering (c), the generation of increased quantities of renewable energy becomes possible; (e) also considering (c), the combustion of landfill gas reduces overall greenhouse gas emissions from a landfill site; (f) again considering (c), smaller landfills can pro-actively manage risks posed by landfill gas; and (g) this invention can improve the safety and efficiency of the drilling process to install landfill gas extraction points. Although the invention has been described with reference to specific examples, it would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention may be embodied in many other forms.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A method for strategically locating gas extraction points within a landfill area; said method including the steps of: conducting a thermal infrared scan of the landfill area to identify zones of elevated surface temperature; recording data indicative of said zones of elevated surface temperature; conducting an electrical resistivity survey of the landfill area to identify zones of low resistivity; recording data indicative of said zones of low resistivity; processing the data so as to identify locations having zones of low resistivity and elevated surface temperature, which locations are to have said extraction points.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the electrical resistivity survey is conducted in said zones of elevated surface temperature.
3. The method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the thermal infrared scan is conducted during a time period just prior to dawn.
4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, said method including further processing the data so as to identify locations having zones of continuous resistivity linking areas of low resistivity and elevated surface temperature indicating a high probability of being a gas migration pathway.
5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, said method including further processing the data so as to identify locations having zones of high resistivity and elevated surface temperature indicating a high probability of being a gas confining layer.
6. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, further including locating a gas extraction well at an identified location.
PCT/AU2003/000647 2002-07-12 2003-05-28 A method for strategically locating gas extraction points WO2004007106A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2003229103A AU2003229103B2 (en) 2002-07-12 2003-05-28 A method for strategically locating gas extraction points

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2002950152 2002-07-12
AU2002950152A AU2002950152A0 (en) 2002-07-12 2002-07-12 A method for strategically locating gas extraction points

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004007106A1 true WO2004007106A1 (en) 2004-01-22

Family

ID=27809254

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU2003/000647 WO2004007106A1 (en) 2002-07-12 2003-05-28 A method for strategically locating gas extraction points

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2002950152A0 (en)
WO (1) WO2004007106A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103157641A (en) * 2013-02-26 2013-06-19 上海市环境工程设计科学研究院有限公司 Automatic rolling type non-point source pollution gas gathering device and application thereof
CN114320443A (en) * 2021-12-24 2022-04-12 安徽理工大学 This coal seam gas drainage device
WO2024152031A1 (en) * 2023-01-15 2024-07-18 Seekops Inc. Intelligent placement of gas collection systems for landfill gas production

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4670148A (en) * 1984-11-10 1987-06-02 Reinhard Schneider Apparatus and method for withdrawing gaseous decomposition products from a refuse dump
US4838733A (en) * 1988-12-05 1989-06-13 Katz Albert A Landfill compaction
US5063519A (en) * 1989-09-18 1991-11-05 Pacific Energy Landfill gas production testing and extraction method

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4670148A (en) * 1984-11-10 1987-06-02 Reinhard Schneider Apparatus and method for withdrawing gaseous decomposition products from a refuse dump
US4838733A (en) * 1988-12-05 1989-06-13 Katz Albert A Landfill compaction
US5063519A (en) * 1989-09-18 1991-11-05 Pacific Energy Landfill gas production testing and extraction method

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103157641A (en) * 2013-02-26 2013-06-19 上海市环境工程设计科学研究院有限公司 Automatic rolling type non-point source pollution gas gathering device and application thereof
CN103157641B (en) * 2013-02-26 2015-03-18 上海市环境工程设计科学研究院有限公司 Automatic rolling type non-point source pollution gas gathering device and application thereof
CN114320443A (en) * 2021-12-24 2022-04-12 安徽理工大学 This coal seam gas drainage device
WO2024152031A1 (en) * 2023-01-15 2024-07-18 Seekops Inc. Intelligent placement of gas collection systems for landfill gas production

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2002950152A0 (en) 2002-09-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Farr et al. The temperature of Britain's coalfields
Belcher et al. Fireball passes and nothing burns—The role of thermal radiation in the Cretaceous-Tertiary event: Evidence from the charcoal record of North America
Busse et al. Soil heating during burning of forest slash piles and wood piles
CN104350984A (en) Dam termite prevention and treatment technique
Gillespie et al. Deep geothermal energy potential in Scotland
Schneider et al. True colors–experimental identification of hydrological processes at a hillslope prone to slide
Rosqvist et al. Mapping landfill gas migration using resistivity monitoring
Kim et al. Fires in abandoned coal mines and waste banks
WO2004007106A1 (en) A method for strategically locating gas extraction points
Frid et al. Geophysical-geochemical investigation of fire-prone landfills
AU2003229103B2 (en) A method for strategically locating gas extraction points
Li et al. Environmental engineering issues induced by abandoned coal mine hidden disasters
Walter Anthony et al. Upland Yedoma taliks are an unpredicted source of atmospheric methane
Nicholas et al. Concurrent permafrost aggradation and degradation induced by forest clearing, central Alaska, USA
Ballukraya et al. Sharp variations in groundwater levels at the same location
Motamedi et al. Field investigation on geothermal pavements
Chen et al. Simulating the thermal regime of a railway embankment structure on the Tibetan Plateau under climate change
Clay The origin of relic cryogenic mounds at East Walton and Thompson Common, Norfolk, England
Kingston et al. Critical evaluation of state-of-the-art in situ thermal treatment technologies for DNAPL source zone treatment
Meju Geophysical mapping of polluted groundwater in a closed landfill site
CN208028228U (en) A kind of earthing or grounding means of coastal high soil resistivity Wind turbines
Farr et al. and Hydrogeology
Coulibaly et al. Contribution of electrical resistivity method to the location of aquifers of Precambrian basement in the department of Tanda (North-Eastern Côte d’Ivoire)
Smith Derivation of first-order decay heat generation function and prediction of thermal energy potential for a municipal solid waste landfill
Whittington et al. Assessment of flooded mine shafts for thermal energy storage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NI NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003229103

Country of ref document: AU

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 2003229103

Country of ref document: AU