WO2001013226A1 - Method of distributing software updates in an event-driven network - Google Patents
Method of distributing software updates in an event-driven network Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2001013226A1 WO2001013226A1 PCT/SE2000/001581 SE0001581W WO0113226A1 WO 2001013226 A1 WO2001013226 A1 WO 2001013226A1 SE 0001581 W SE0001581 W SE 0001581W WO 0113226 A1 WO0113226 A1 WO 0113226A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- new
- strategy
- component
- network
- event
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 65
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003116 impacting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/60—Software deployment
- G06F8/65—Updates
Definitions
- This invention relates to software systems, and more particularly, to a method of distributing software updates to handle previously unknown event types in a large multi-domain federation network of event-driven components.
- Description of Related Art Currently, an increasing number of software systems (for example, telecommunication systems) rely on distributed architectures whose components are controlled across multiple administrative domains. The industry is looking for ways to avoid tightly coupled characteristics of components so that portions of the distributed system can be upgraded or changed without impact on other parts of the system.
- NMSs Network Management Systems
- various network elements under management are evolving rapidly over time.
- cooperative management agreements for the management of network elements are also changing frequently due to the rapid making and breaking of business partnerships in the telecommunications industry.
- These facts make it more critical that methods be devised to make upgrades or changes to network elements without adversely impacting other parts of the network.
- a physical device like a switch
- a logical device like a software application
- problems may arise.
- the existing installed management software may not be able to process the new event types, and the benefits of the new types of information generated by the new device are lost.
- the introduction of previously undefined event types may introduce instability throughout the system.
- the requirement to be backward-compatible may limit the capabilities that the new generation can have.
- the older generation may be retired after installation of the new generation, thus making the effort and expense to achieve backward-compatibility unnecessary.
- it would be advantageous to have a method of distributing software updates which does not require an operator to simultaneously update of all of the affected network components, and does not require the costly and sometimes unnecessary process of designing new event types to be backward-compatible with currently known event types. The present invention provides such a method.
- the present invention is a method of distributing software to handle a new event type in a network having a plurality of decoupled, event-driven components which produce and consume events.
- the method includes the steps of pushing a new software strategy for handling a new event type from a producer component into the network, and utilizing push technology to distribute the new strategy to the components in the network.
- the step of distributing the new strategy may include selectively distributing the new strategy utilizing filtering capabilities in the push technology to determine whether the new strategy is applicable to each component in the network, and pushing the new strategy to those components for which the new strategy is applicable.
- the method of the present invention may utilize a publish and push technology that does not utilize filtering in the individual components. Additionally, the invention may be applied only to update existing components.
- the method comprises the steps of pushing a new software strategy for handling anew event type from a producer component to consumer components in the network, and utilizing the new strategy by the existing components to process events of the new type. If the method is to be utilized for new components as well, then the method also includes the steps of caching the new strategy in the components in the network, determining when a new consumer component binds into the network and subscribes to events of the new event type, and pushing the new strategy to the new component. The new strategy is then utilized by the new component to process events of the new type.
- the method includes the steps of pushing a new software strategy for handling a new event type from a producer component into the network, and utilizing push technology to selectively distribute the new strategy to the components in the network. It is determined whether the new strategy is applicable to each component in the network, and upon determining that the new strategy is applicable to a given component, the strategy is cached by the given component and utilized by the given component to process events of the new type. Upon determining that the new strategy is not applicable to a given component, the strategy is cached by the given component for use by downstream components. When a new consumer component binds into the network and subscribes to events of the new event type, the new strategy is pushed to the new component.
- the method may also begin by having the producer component first determine a plurality of new events occurring in the network as a result of a new event type.
- the producer component classifies the plurality of new events into at least one event- specific class.
- the producer component then pushes into the network, a single event of a first event-specific class along with a first new software strategy for handling the first event-specific class.
- the first new strategy is selectively distributed to the components in the network utilizing push technology. If the first new strategy is applicable to a given component, the first new strategy is cached by the component and utilized to process events of the new type. If not applicable to the component, the first new strategy is cached by the component for use by downstream components. The process of distributing a strategy is then repeated for each event-specific class.
- the strategies are cached in the network components and are pushed to new components that bind to the network and subscribe to events of the new type. Thereafter, the new strategies are utilized by the components that received them to process events of the new type.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating the steps performed by a producer component in the preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the steps performed by the push technology in the preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention
- FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the steps performed by a consumer component in the preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention
- FIG. 4 is an illustrative drawing of an exemplary scenario showing the introduction of a new event type in a federation network according to the teachings of the present invention.
- the present invention describes a method of distributing software to handle previously unknown event types in a large multi-domain "federation" network of decoupled, event-driven components which manage, distribute, and process events.
- One way to build such a decoupled-component network is to use "publish and push" technologies.
- An information producer publishes the information and pushes it into the network.
- One or more information consumer(s) registers itself with the network, and the network pushes information to the information consumer.
- the information producer and the information consumer are decoupled by a store-and- forward medium. The producer need not be aware of the consumer(s), and states of the producers are independent from the states of the consumers (and vice versa).
- the information may be network events such as network alarms, network performance data, network accounting data, etc.
- Information producers may be network elements, and information consumers may be telecommunications Network Management Systems
- publish and push technologies facilitate the construction of a federation of distributed, event-driven components.
- each component produces and/or consumes events to fulfill its specific role in the federation.
- Some of these components may be gateways that receive information emitted by devices or other systems, and translate the information into events. Then, they push the events into the network.
- Other components interested in receiving those event types, subscribe to the network so that those events will be pushed to them in the future.
- These components after receiving the events, process them and may generate new events based on the processed information which are also pushed into the network.
- software updates are automatically distributed in the federation.
- Components issuing new event types are responsible for supplying consumer components with appropriate software (hereinafter called Strategy) for handling the new event types.
- Strategy which is normally stored within the event, may be entirely new code for handling events of the new type, or it may be a patch for existing code.
- the consumer decides whether the strategy is applicable to it. If so, the Strategy is installed and thereafter affects the behavior of the consumer component according to information carried in the new event type.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating the steps performed by a producer component (Producer) 10 in the preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention.
- a plurality of Producers represented as Producers 1-N may be performing the steps of FIG. 1 for different events.
- the Producer creates a new event.
- the Producer may use its knowledge of component types in the federation to determine a plurality of new events that will be generated by the introduction of a new event type in the federation.
- the Producer classifies the new events into event-specific classes, and determines an associated Strategy for each event-specific class. The number of required Strategies depends on the number of roles anew event will affect.
- the Producer determines whether or not the Strategy for the event has already been pushed into the network. If the Strategy has not been pushed, the method moves to step 13 where the strategy is stored in the event.
- the event is then pushed to the push technology 15 for distribution in the network regardless of whether there are consumers for the event type or not.
- the event conveying the class should include a release number corresponding to the format of the produced event type it is designed to handle. If it is determined at step 12 that the Strategy for the event has already been pushed, then the event is pushed at step 14 without Strategy.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the steps performed by the push technology 15 in the preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention when an event is received from a Producer 10.
- step 21 it is determined whether or not there is a filtering capability in the push technology. If so, it is determined at 22 whether or not the event is to be filtered. If so, the event is filtered out and discarded at 23. If there are no filtering capabilities, or the event is not to be filtered, the method moves to step 24 where the event is pushed to consumer components (Consumers) 25.
- consumer components Conssumers
- filters in the push technology selectively distribute the new Strategy to consumer components in the federation.
- the filtering capabilities of the push technology being utilized in the network for inter-component communications determine whether or not a given Strategy is applicable to a given component. For example, if a filter is inserted upstream from a particular component, and the filter blocks the distribution of a particular Strategy, then the component has no knowledge of the Strategy until the filter is removed.
- FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the steps performed by a consumer component 25 in the preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention when an event with Strategy arrives from the push technology 15.
- it is determined whether or not the Strategy is applicable for the receiving Consumer. If so, the Consumer installs the Strategy at 32 and then uses the Strategy to process events of the new type at 33. The Consumer then caches the Strategy at step 34. If it is determined at step 31 that the Strategy is not applicable for the receiving Consumer, the method moves directly to step 34 and caches the Strategy for subsequent distribution to downstream components that require it.
- step 35 it is determined whether or not the Consumer 25 is also a Producer of events for downstream components. If so, the event with Strategy is then pushed to the push technology 15 for distribution to downstream components in the network. If the Consumer is not a Producer, the method moves to step 36 where the processing within the Consumer stops.
- the distributed Strategies implement a role-based interface.
- Each role a component can play is associated with an abstract interface.
- a component responsible for storing information in a database may use a Strategy which implements an interface that returns a unique key for a given event (to be stored). That key is usually specific to one event type.
- a producer of a new event type should then produce an appropriate Strategy that can create a key based on the new information in the new event type. If a new consumer binds into the federation and subscribes for events of the new type, the federation downloads the appropriate Strategy to the consumer in its initial download, and the new Strategy is then utilized by the new consumer to process events of the new type.
- FIG. 4 is an illustrative drawing of an exemplary scenario showing the introduction of a new event type in a federation network according to the teachings of the present invention.
- Components PI 41 and P2 42 are Producers of events 43 and 44, respectively, in the federation.
- PI and P2 provide associated Strategies stored in the events regardless of whether there are consumers in the federation for those event types or not.
- the events and Strategies are provided via push technology (PT) 15 to consumer Cl 45.
- C3 is a component which correlates alarm messages it receives and issues correlation events 48 back into the federation through PT 15.
- C4 is exemplified as a component which displays events to an operator through a user interface, and provides the operator with a software connection 49 to a physical device 51 connected to P2.
- Producer P2 connects to the new physical device 51 , and determines a Strategy associated with this event.
- the new event and the new Strategy are pushed through the federation, as described above, to consumer Cl where they are cached.
- the new Strategy is pushed to consumers C3 and C4 where it is cached.
- Consumer C3 in this example determines that the new Strategy is not applicable, and therefore disregards the new Strategy.
- Consumer C4 determines that the new Strategy is applicable to it, and installs the new Strategy. C4 may then use the new Strategy to provide the software connection 49 to the physical device 51 , or to communicate with P2. If a new consumer C5 52 binds to the federation and subscribes to the new event, Cl sends the new Strategy to C5.
- Consumer C5 caches the new Strategy and thereafter utilizes the new Strategy when it receives events of the new type.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP00957171A EP1277111A1 (en) | 1999-08-16 | 2000-08-15 | Method of distributing software updates in an event-driven network |
CA002402254A CA2402254A1 (en) | 1999-08-16 | 2000-08-15 | Method of distributing software updates in an event-driven network |
AU68825/00A AU768653B2 (en) | 1999-08-16 | 2000-08-15 | Method of distributing software updates in an event-driven network |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US37517799A | 1999-08-16 | 1999-08-16 | |
US09/375,177 | 1999-08-16 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2001013226A1 true WO2001013226A1 (en) | 2001-02-22 |
Family
ID=23479808
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2000/001581 WO2001013226A1 (en) | 1999-08-16 | 2000-08-15 | Method of distributing software updates in an event-driven network |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1277111A1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1153137C (en) |
AU (1) | AU768653B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2402254A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001013226A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7853609B2 (en) | 2004-03-12 | 2010-12-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Update distribution system architecture and method for distributing software |
US8612997B2 (en) | 2008-01-15 | 2013-12-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Event-driven component integration framework for implementing distributed systems |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7546582B2 (en) * | 2005-03-30 | 2009-06-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing dynamic configuration data for producer components in a computer infrastructure |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0537098A2 (en) * | 1991-10-11 | 1993-04-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Event handling mechanism having a filtering process and an action association process |
EP0759591A1 (en) * | 1995-08-18 | 1997-02-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Event management service |
US5862325A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1999-01-19 | Intermind Corporation | Computer-based communication system and method using metadata defining a control structure |
US5933645A (en) * | 1996-03-19 | 1999-08-03 | Oracle Corporation | Non-invasive extensibility of software applications |
-
2000
- 2000-08-15 EP EP00957171A patent/EP1277111A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2000-08-15 CA CA002402254A patent/CA2402254A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-08-15 CN CNB008143897A patent/CN1153137C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-08-15 AU AU68825/00A patent/AU768653B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2000-08-15 WO PCT/SE2000/001581 patent/WO2001013226A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0537098A2 (en) * | 1991-10-11 | 1993-04-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Event handling mechanism having a filtering process and an action association process |
EP0759591A1 (en) * | 1995-08-18 | 1997-02-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Event management service |
US5862325A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1999-01-19 | Intermind Corporation | Computer-based communication system and method using metadata defining a control structure |
US5933645A (en) * | 1996-03-19 | 1999-08-03 | Oracle Corporation | Non-invasive extensibility of software applications |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
GIL SEONG NA ET AL: "Interoperability of Event Service in Java ORB Environment", IEEE COMPUT SOC, USA. PROCEEDINGS TENTH INT WORKSHOP ON DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, 1 September 1999 (1999-09-01) - 3 September 1999 (1999-09-03), LOS ALAMITOS, CA, USA, pages 29 - 32, Florence, Italy, XP002932719 * |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7853609B2 (en) | 2004-03-12 | 2010-12-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Update distribution system architecture and method for distributing software |
US8612997B2 (en) | 2008-01-15 | 2013-12-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Event-driven component integration framework for implementing distributed systems |
US8799930B2 (en) | 2008-01-15 | 2014-08-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Event-driven component integration framework for implementing distributed systems |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU6882500A (en) | 2001-03-13 |
CA2402254A1 (en) | 2001-02-22 |
AU768653B2 (en) | 2003-12-18 |
CN1153137C (en) | 2004-06-09 |
EP1277111A1 (en) | 2003-01-22 |
CN1379876A (en) | 2002-11-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8139509B2 (en) | Installation and management of mobile device [{S]} configuration | |
US6684244B1 (en) | Aggregated policy deployment and status propagation in network management systems | |
JP5391276B2 (en) | Intelligent mobile device management client | |
US7085822B1 (en) | Managing pervasive devices | |
US20070169073A1 (en) | Update package generation and distribution network | |
CN101170446B (en) | A license management method, server, client and system | |
US20050267951A1 (en) | Rolling upgrade of distributed software with automatic completion | |
JP2000512093A (en) | Integrated telecommunication service outsourcing system and method | |
CN102647455B (en) | The processing method of moving advertising, proxy server and terminal | |
EP1575244A2 (en) | Update distribution system architecture and method for distributing software | |
US20090006444A1 (en) | Method and system for distribution of information | |
CN105528205A (en) | Update control method and update control system | |
CN110389766A (en) | HBase container cluster dispositions method, system, equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
CN105653328A (en) | Multi-version program coexistence method and apparatus for big memory service | |
CN101963913B (en) | Method for online evolution of component based on transactions | |
AU768653B2 (en) | Method of distributing software updates in an event-driven network | |
DE102004032491A1 (en) | Controlling access to features of call processing software | |
US9235437B2 (en) | Method and integration component for integrating OSGi environments into a Service-oriented Architecture | |
US20090037493A1 (en) | Method and device for updating an object with copyright attribute | |
CN102741829B (en) | Message based synchronous method and system thereof for mobile service object | |
CN108536773A (en) | A kind of auto alarm information integrating method, device, equipment and medium | |
CN113076130A (en) | General counter system operation and maintenance method based on SHELL script | |
US20060047806A1 (en) | Mediation-based methods and devices for updating operations support systems | |
US20060064388A1 (en) | Method and system for the total decoupling of licenses from associated license protected configuration | |
CN108259575A (en) | Advertisement broadcast method, system, self-service device and Advertisement Server |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: IN/PCT/2002/00177/DE Country of ref document: IN |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2000957171 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 68825/00 Country of ref document: AU |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 008143897 Country of ref document: CN |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2402254 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2000957171 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 68825/00 Country of ref document: AU |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 2000957171 Country of ref document: EP |