WO2000077515A2 - Process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution - Google Patents
Process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2000077515A2 WO2000077515A2 PCT/EP2000/004729 EP0004729W WO0077515A2 WO 2000077515 A2 WO2000077515 A2 WO 2000077515A2 EP 0004729 W EP0004729 W EP 0004729W WO 0077515 A2 WO0077515 A2 WO 0077515A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- solution
- spinning dope
- concentration
- dope solution
- polymer
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/22—Details, e.g. general constructional or apparatus details
- G01N29/30—Arrangements for calibrating or comparing, e.g. with standard objects
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/02—Analysing fluids
- G01N29/024—Analysing fluids by measuring propagation velocity or propagation time of acoustic waves
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/022—Liquids
- G01N2291/0222—Binary liquids
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/022—Liquids
- G01N2291/0224—Mixtures of three or more liquids
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/028—Material parameters
- G01N2291/02809—Concentration of a compound, e.g. measured by a surface mass change
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/028—Material parameters
- G01N2291/02818—Density, viscosity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/10—Number of transducers
- G01N2291/102—Number of transducers one emitter, one receiver
Definitions
- the invention pertains to a process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution.
- Fiber industry One area of technology that is a source and motivation for polymer research, particularly with respect to mechanical properties, is the fiber industry.
- the most widely used fiber-forming processes are melt spinning and solution spinning. In both processes, the polymer is extruded from the orifices of a spinneret. In melt spinning molten polymer is used, while in solution spinning a spinning dope solution is the source of the polymer.
- a small increase in the concentration could initiate the formation of a non-homogeneous or highly viscous spinning dope solution, which is unsuitable for the production of fibers with consistent properties and often also results in very inconvenient process equipment problems during production of the fibers. Therefore, it is important to determine the concentration as rapidly and accurately as possible.
- Several methods are known in the art for determining the polymer concentration in a solution, such as light scattering, density, conductivity, and refractive index measurement, and Infrared, Near Infrared, Raman, and UV spectroscopy.
- the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution is determined by measuring the density of the solution. However, said measurement often is not accurate enough to bring fluctuations in the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution to notice.
- devices for measuring the density of a spinning dope solution are difficult to clean. These disadvantages become even more important when the measurement is carried out in-line.
- the primary object of the present invention to provide a method to determine the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution rapidly and accurately. Furthermore, the device used for this determination preferably is easier to clean than other presently commercially available devices.
- a process has been found that allows fast and accurate determination of the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution.
- the process is characterized in that the determination is carried out by measuring the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in the solution.
- the process according to the invention can be applied using a spinning dope solution that is prepared either batch-wise or continuously by dissolving or dispersing any polymer in any solvent or any solution. Furthermore, a spinning dope solution with any polymer concentration can be used. Therefore, the process can be applied in the production of any fiber.
- a spinning dope solution with any polymer concentration can be used for the production of any fiber.
- the process is often required to use a spinning dope solution with a high polymer concentration in order to obtain the desired properties. Since the process is highly suitable for monitoring fluctuations, it can be applied advantageously in the production of said fibers.
- a high polymer concentration means a concentration of at least 70%, preferably at least 80% of the concentration at which a non-homogeneous spinning dope solution is formed, or at which the solution becomes too viscous to be used in a spinning process.
- This high concentration generally is between 10 and 25% by weight. If poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) is used as the polymer in a sulfuhc acid (approx. 99.8% by weight) solution, then this high concentration is about 16 to 21% by weight.
- the spin dope concentration is not kept constant such high polymer concentration spinning dope solutions first of all pose problems in the production of fibers with consistent properties, and also lead to very inconvenient problems with the process equipment during production of the fibers.
- the determination of a polymer concentration according to the invention can be applied to spinning dope solutions and samples thereof, and can be carried out by measuring the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in the solution with an ultrasonic device comprising an emitter and a receiver for ultrasonic sound.
- the device generates ultrasonic sound waves at the emitter, measures the time it takes before such a wave from the emitter passing through the solution arrives at the receiver, and calculates the propagation velocity as the distance between the emitter and the receiver divided by this time.
- Ultrasonic sound with a frequency between 50 kHz and 100 MHz can be used.
- the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution can be determined by comparing the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in this solution with reference propagation velocity values including graphs. These reference values have been measured in spinning dope solutions with known amounts of the polymer, by using the same solvent or solution for dispersing or dissolving the polymer as in the spinning dope solution where the concentration has to be determined.
- the propagation velocity (v) of ultrasonic sound in general depends on the density (d) and the adiabatic compressibility (c) of the solution according to the following equation:
- the ultrasonic device used for measuring the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound comprises a temperature sensor in order to enable local adjustment of the temperature in the solution between the emitter and the receiver.
- the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in a spinning dope solution is also slightly dependent on the flow of the solution in which the measurement takes place.
- the propagation velocity is measured perpendicular to the flow direction.
- the distance between the emitter and the receiver also plays a role.
- a relatively large distance is preferred, providing the temperature and the pressure of the solution between the emitter and the receiver can be kept constant.
- a practical distance is between 1 and 10 cm, without it being the intention to limit the invention to this range. Most practical is a distance between 1 and 5 cm.
- the polymer is dissolved or dispersed homogeneously in the solution, secondly that the solution is free from air-bubbles, and finally that the length of any polymer or particle that may be present in the solution is smaller than half the wavelength of the ultrasonic sound used. Furthermore, a relatively large difference in density between the polymer and the solution used to dissolve or disperse this polymer is preferred, in order to attain enough sensitivity for determining the concentration of the polymer most accurately.
- In-line measuring means that the measurement is carried out continuously or with certain time intervals in a spinning dope solution or in any process stream consisting of this solution.
- the in-line measurement is carried out automatically, for example controlled by an electronic or computer system. Even more preferably, such an electronic or computer system is able to give signals or commands for correcting the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution as soon as possible when necessary, thereby preventing fluctuations in this concentration as much as possible.
- an ultrasonic device measuring the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound inline often can also be used for the qualitative monitoring of other irregularities in the solution, such as air-bubbles and non-dissolved particles. This monitoring will contribute further to the production of fibers of consistent composition and properties.
- Density measurements were carried out in-line using a density meter DIMF 2.0 (Bopp and Reuter), and propagation velocity measurements of ultrasonic sound with a frequency of about 1.5 MHz were carried out in-line using a LiquiSonicTM (SensoTech) as ultrasonic device.
- In-line in this example means, in a spinning dope solution that flows from a storage tank to a spinneret through a tube with a internal diameter of 16 mm.
- the emitter and the receiver of the ultrasonic device are arranged in such a way that the generated ultrasonic sound propagates perpendicular to the flow direction, and the distance between the emitter and the receiver is about 2 cm.
- Spinning dope solutions containing 18.04, 18.60, 19.03, 19.60, and 19.83% PPTA poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) by weight, respectively, were prepared batch-wise by dispersing the required amount of PPTA in sulfuric acid (99.8% by weight) solutions.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Processes Of Treating Macromolecular Substances (AREA)
- Spinning Methods And Devices For Manufacturing Artificial Fibers (AREA)
Abstract
The invention pertains to a process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution by measuring the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in the solution. The process enables prevention of fluctuations in this concentration as much as possible, and is therefore highly suitable for application in the production of fibers with consistent properties. An ultrasonic device used in the process is easier to clean, install, and calibrate than other presently commercially available devices.
Description
PROCESS FOR DETERMINING THE POLYMER CONCENTRATION IN A SPINNING DOPE SOLUTION
The invention pertains to a process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution.
One area of technology that is a source and motivation for polymer research, particularly with respect to mechanical properties, is the fiber industry. The most widely used fiber-forming processes are melt spinning and solution spinning. In both processes, the polymer is extruded from the orifices of a spinneret. In melt spinning molten polymer is used, while in solution spinning a spinning dope solution is the source of the polymer.
There are many factors that influence the physical and mechanical properties of fibers. If a spinning dope solution is used for the production of fibers, then one of the key parameters that determines these properties is the polymer concentration in the solution. Fluctuations in this concentration should be prevented as much as possible in order to enable the production of fibers with a consistent linear density and consistent properties, such as tensile modulus, relaxation behavior, and fiber strength. Preventing fluctuations in the polymer concentration becomes even more important when a spinning dope solution with a high polymer concentration is used. In this case, a small increase in the concentration could initiate the formation of a non-homogeneous or highly viscous spinning dope solution, which is unsuitable for the production of fibers with consistent properties and often also results in very inconvenient process equipment problems during production of the fibers. Therefore, it is important to determine the concentration as rapidly and accurately as possible.
Several methods are known in the art for determining the polymer concentration in a solution, such as light scattering, density, conductivity, and refractive index measurement, and Infrared, Near Infrared, Raman, and UV spectroscopy. Most commonly, the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution is determined by measuring the density of the solution. However, said measurement often is not accurate enough to bring fluctuations in the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution to notice. Furthermore, devices for measuring the density of a spinning dope solution are difficult to clean. These disadvantages become even more important when the measurement is carried out in-line.
Accordingly, it is the primary object of the present invention to provide a method to determine the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution rapidly and accurately. Furthermore, the device used for this determination preferably is easier to clean than other presently commercially available devices.
Surprisingly, a process has been found that allows fast and accurate determination of the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution. The process is characterized in that the determination is carried out by measuring the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in the solution.
Fast and accurate determination of the polymer concentration in the spinning dope solution enables prevention of fluctuations in this concentration as much as possible. Therefore, this process is highly suitable for application in the production of fibers with consistent properties. An ultrasonic device used in the process according to the invention is easier to clean, install, and calibrate than other presently commercially available devices. Therefore, the ultrasonic device is also highly suitable for application in the in-line measuring of the propagation
velocity of ultrasonic sound in a spinning dope solution in order to determine the polymer concentration in the solution.
A method for determining the polymer concentration using ultrasonic sound has been described in R.S. Bear et al., "Ultrasonic pulse method with nonlinear calibration for quantitative monitoring of polymer blends over a wide temperature range," Analytical Chemistry. Vol. 65, No. 9, 1169-73 (1993). However, it was not disclosed that this method can be used for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution. Furthermore, it was not disclosed that this method can be advantageously used for the production of fibers with consistent properties. And even more specifically, it was not disclosed that this method can be used for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution by the in-line measuring of the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in the solution.
The process according to the invention can be applied using a spinning dope solution that is prepared either batch-wise or continuously by dissolving or dispersing any polymer in any solvent or any solution. Furthermore, a spinning dope solution with any polymer concentration can be used. Therefore, the process can be applied in the production of any fiber. For the production of fibers with a high tensile modulus, where for example one of the aromatic polyamides, or more specifically, poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide), is used as the polymer, it is often required to use a spinning dope solution with a high polymer concentration in order to obtain the desired properties. Since the process is highly suitable for monitoring fluctuations, it can be applied advantageously in the production of said fibers.
A high polymer concentration means a concentration of at least 70%, preferably at least 80% of the concentration at which a non-homogeneous spinning dope solution is formed, or at which the solution becomes too viscous to be used in a spinning process. This high concentration generally is between
10 and 25% by weight. If poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) is used as the polymer in a sulfuhc acid (approx. 99.8% by weight) solution, then this high concentration is about 16 to 21% by weight. When the spin dope concentration is not kept constant such high polymer concentration spinning dope solutions first of all pose problems in the production of fibers with consistent properties, and also lead to very inconvenient problems with the process equipment during production of the fibers.
The determination of a polymer concentration according to the invention can be applied to spinning dope solutions and samples thereof, and can be carried out by measuring the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in the solution with an ultrasonic device comprising an emitter and a receiver for ultrasonic sound. The device generates ultrasonic sound waves at the emitter, measures the time it takes before such a wave from the emitter passing through the solution arrives at the receiver, and calculates the propagation velocity as the distance between the emitter and the receiver divided by this time. Ultrasonic sound with a frequency between 50 kHz and 100 MHz can be used. The polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution can be determined by comparing the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in this solution with reference propagation velocity values including graphs. These reference values have been measured in spinning dope solutions with known amounts of the polymer, by using the same solvent or solution for dispersing or dissolving the polymer as in the spinning dope solution where the concentration has to be determined.
The propagation velocity (v) of ultrasonic sound in general depends on the density (d) and the adiabatic compressibility (c) of the solution according to the following equation:
The propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in a spinning dope solution is also slightly dependent on the flow of the solution in which the measurement takes place. Preferably, the propagation velocity is measured perpendicular to the flow direction. The distance between the emitter and the receiver also plays a role. For an accurate measurement a relatively large distance is preferred, providing the temperature and the pressure of the solution between the emitter and the receiver can be kept constant. A practical distance is between 1 and 10 cm, without it being the intention to limit the invention to this range. Most practical is a distance between 1 and 5 cm.
In order to determine the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution most accurately by using ultrasonic sound, it is also preferred first of all that the polymer is dissolved or dispersed homogeneously in the solution, secondly that the solution is free from air-bubbles, and finally that the length of any polymer or particle that may be present in the solution is smaller than half the wavelength of the ultrasonic sound used. Furthermore, a relatively large difference in density between the polymer and the solution used to dissolve or disperse this polymer is preferred, in order to attain enough sensitivity for determining the concentration of the polymer most accurately.
If the determination of the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution is carried out by in-line measuring of the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in the solution, then it becomes even more practical to monitor fluctuations in the concentration and to take the appropriate measures to prevent such fluctuations. In-line measuring means that the measurement is carried out continuously or with certain time intervals in a spinning dope solution or in any process stream consisting of this solution. Preferably, the in-line measurement is carried out automatically, for example controlled by an electronic or computer system. Even more preferably, such an electronic or computer system is able to give signals or commands for correcting the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution as soon as possible when necessary, thereby preventing fluctuations in this concentration as much as possible.
Apart from determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution, an ultrasonic device measuring the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound inline often can also be used for the qualitative monitoring of other irregularities in the solution, such as air-bubbles and non-dissolved particles. This monitoring will contribute further to the production of fibers of consistent composition and properties.
The invention will be further illustrated with reference to the following example.
Example:
Density measurements were carried out in-line using a density meter DIMF 2.0 (Bopp and Reuter), and propagation velocity measurements of ultrasonic sound with a frequency of about 1.5 MHz were carried out in-line using a LiquiSonic™ (SensoTech) as ultrasonic device. In-line in this example means, in a spinning dope solution that flows from a storage tank to a spinneret through a tube with a internal diameter of 16 mm. The emitter and the receiver of the ultrasonic device are arranged in such a way that the generated ultrasonic sound propagates perpendicular to the flow direction, and the distance between the emitter and the receiver is about 2 cm.
Spinning dope solutions containing 18.04, 18.60, 19.03, 19.60, and 19.83% PPTA (= poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) by weight, respectively, were prepared batch-wise by dispersing the required amount of PPTA in sulfuric acid (99.8% by weight) solutions.
The density of, and the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in, each spinning dope solution were measured in-line at a constant temperature, pressure, and flow velocity of 85°C, 35 bar, and 20 kg/hour, respectively. From the results in Table I it can be concluded first of all that there is an almost linear relation between the density and the PPTA concentration, and secondly that the sensitivity of a density measurement in this example is about 2.7 kg/m3 per % PPTA. The intrinsic error of such a measurement is about 0.074% PPTA, calculated as the specified reproducibility of the density meter (0.20 kg/m3) divided by the sensitivity of the measurement. Furthermore, it can be concluded from the results in Table I first of all that also the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound has an almost linear relation with the PPTA concentration, and secondly that the sensitivity of a propagation velocity measurement in this example is about 16.7 m/s per % PPTA. The intrinsic error of said measurement is about 0.0060% PPTA, calculated as the
specified reproducibility of the ultrasonic device (0.10 m/s) divided by the sensitivity of the measurement.
This example shows that a propagation velocity measurement of ultrasonic sound is much more sensitive per % PPTA than a density measurement. Furthermore, the intrinsic error in the result of an ultrasonic sound measurement is much lower than the intrinsic error in the result of a density measurement. Therefore, it can be concluded that the ultrasonic sound measurements of this example are much more accurate for the determination of the PPTA concentration in the spinning dope solution than the density measurements.
After the measurements the devices were cleaned. It appeared that it was very easy to clean the ultrasonic device, while it was almost impossible to clean the device used for the density measurements.
TABLE
PPTA Density Propagation velocity of concentration ultrasonic sound
(% by weight) (kg/m3) (m/s)
18.04 1754.80 1464.22
18.60 1753.65 1474.36
19.03 1752.35 1481.40
19.60 1751.22 1487.48
19.83 1750.05 1494.45
Claims
1. A process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution, characterized in that the determination is carried out by measuring the propagation velocity of ultrasonic sound in the solution.
2. The process according to claim 1 wherein a spinning dope solution with a high polymer concentration is used.
3. The process according to claim 2 wherein the high concentration is from 10 to 25% by weight.
4. The process according to claim 2 wherein the high concentration is from 16 to 21% by weight.
5. The process according to any one of claims 1-4 wherein the polymer is an aromatic polyamide.
6. The process according to claim 5 wherein the aromatic polyamide is poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide).
7. The process according to any one of claims 1-6 wherein the propagation velocity is measured in-line.
8. The process according to any one of claims 1-7 wherein the propagation velocity is measured using an ultrasonic device comprising an emitter and a receiver for ultrasonic sound.
Priority Applications (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2001503522A JP4582751B2 (en) | 1999-06-16 | 2000-05-23 | Method for producing fibers |
| US10/009,804 US6672164B1 (en) | 1999-06-16 | 2000-05-23 | Process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution |
| AU59688/00A AU5968800A (en) | 1999-06-16 | 2000-05-23 | Process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution |
| GB0200404A GB2367363B (en) | 1999-06-16 | 2000-05-23 | Process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP99201907.5 | 1999-06-16 | ||
| EP99201907 | 1999-06-16 | ||
| US14560099P | 1999-07-26 | 1999-07-26 | |
| US60/145,600 | 1999-07-26 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2000077515A2 true WO2000077515A2 (en) | 2000-12-21 |
| WO2000077515A3 WO2000077515A3 (en) | 2001-02-08 |
Family
ID=26153331
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2000/004729 WO2000077515A2 (en) | 1999-06-16 | 2000-05-23 | Process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4582751B2 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU5968800A (en) |
| GB (1) | GB2367363B (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2000077515A2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8309642B2 (en) | 2007-02-03 | 2012-11-13 | Teijin Aramid B.V. | Method for dissolving aramid polymer in sulfuric acid using a double shaft kneader |
| CN107462630A (en) * | 2017-08-16 | 2017-12-12 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of polymer concentration detection method and equipment based on sound velocity method |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE3420794A1 (en) * | 1983-06-10 | 1984-12-13 | Helmut Dr. Heimel | Device for investigating liquid properties |
| US5433112A (en) * | 1992-09-15 | 1995-07-18 | Piche; Luc | Ultrasonic characterization of polymer melts under processing conditions |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS63243330A (en) * | 1987-03-31 | 1988-10-11 | Asahi Chem Ind Co Ltd | Production of high-modulus fiber |
| US5762798A (en) * | 1991-04-12 | 1998-06-09 | Minntech Corporation | Hollow fiber membranes and method of manufacture |
| US5354524A (en) * | 1993-05-24 | 1994-10-11 | Alan Sellars | Monitoring concentration of dope in product manufacture |
| DE69812946T2 (en) * | 1997-06-20 | 2003-12-18 | The Dow Chemical Co., Midland | ETHYLENE POLYMER COMPOSITIONS AND OBJECTS MADE THEREOF |
-
2000
- 2000-05-23 WO PCT/EP2000/004729 patent/WO2000077515A2/en active Application Filing
- 2000-05-23 JP JP2001503522A patent/JP4582751B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-05-23 GB GB0200404A patent/GB2367363B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-05-23 AU AU59688/00A patent/AU5968800A/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE3420794A1 (en) * | 1983-06-10 | 1984-12-13 | Helmut Dr. Heimel | Device for investigating liquid properties |
| US5433112A (en) * | 1992-09-15 | 1995-07-18 | Piche; Luc | Ultrasonic characterization of polymer melts under processing conditions |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| ANONYMOUS: "Ultrasonic measurement and control of polymer melt compositions" RESEARCH DISCLOSURE, vol. 263, 1986, page 127 XP002124943 gb * |
| BEAR R S ET AL: "ULTRASONIC PULSE METHOD WITH NONLINEAR CALIBRATION FOR QUANTITATIVE MONITORING OF POLYMER BLENDS OVER A WIDE TEMPERATURE RANGE" ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY,US,AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY. COLUMBUS, vol. 65, no. 9, 1993, page 1169-1173 XP000368536 ISSN: 0003-2700 cited in the application * |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8309642B2 (en) | 2007-02-03 | 2012-11-13 | Teijin Aramid B.V. | Method for dissolving aramid polymer in sulfuric acid using a double shaft kneader |
| CN107462630A (en) * | 2017-08-16 | 2017-12-12 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of polymer concentration detection method and equipment based on sound velocity method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP4582751B2 (en) | 2010-11-17 |
| AU5968800A (en) | 2001-01-02 |
| GB0200404D0 (en) | 2002-02-27 |
| GB2367363A (en) | 2002-04-03 |
| GB2367363B (en) | 2003-07-23 |
| WO2000077515A3 (en) | 2001-02-08 |
| JP2003502640A (en) | 2003-01-21 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6672164B1 (en) | Process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution | |
| US6405579B1 (en) | Scaleless on-line rheometer device | |
| CN1041208C (en) | Rigid rod polymer based on pyridobisimidazole | |
| Djabourov et al. | Small-angle x-ray scattering characterization of agarose sols and gels | |
| Han et al. | Rheological properties of mixtures of molten polymer and fluorocarbon blowing agent. I. Mixtures of low‐density polyethylene and fluorocarbon blowing agent | |
| US3869430A (en) | High modulus, high tenacity poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) fiber | |
| KR960702549A (en) | Dope concentration monitoring device for manufacturing cellulose products | |
| EP1348115B1 (en) | Viscosity measurement | |
| Alig et al. | Combination of NIR, Raman, ultrasonic and dielectric spectroscopy for in‐line monitoring of the extrusion process | |
| EP0225917A1 (en) | Non-destructive method for determining the extent of cure of a polymer. | |
| Chen et al. | On-line measurement of residence time distribution in a twin-screw extruder | |
| WO2000077515A2 (en) | Process for determining the polymer concentration in a spinning dope solution | |
| US4992487A (en) | Method for determining flow behavior index and using index to control polymer rheology and physical properties | |
| Bur et al. | Fluorescence monitoring of twin screw extrusion | |
| McInerney et al. | Melt strength and extensibility of talc‐filled polypropylene | |
| Bernnat | Polymer melt rheology and the rheotens test | |
| WO1999027350A1 (en) | Online measurement of crystallinity in semicrystalline polymers by raman spectroscopy | |
| Boerstoel | Liquid crystalline solutions of cellulose in phosphoric acid for preparing cellulose yarns | |
| US6691561B2 (en) | Rheological measurement process | |
| CN1172033C (en) | Method and device for producing cellulosed shaped bodies | |
| CN110954495A (en) | Method for detecting inherent viscosity of para-aramid resin by adopting near infrared spectrum | |
| Xanthos et al. | Recent developments in in‐line spectroscopy/microscopy for monitoring extrusion processes | |
| FI115639B (en) | Method for measuring the amount of stripping agent on polymer fibers | |
| US5014545A (en) | Apparatus for determining flow behavior index | |
| US3979666A (en) | Method and apparatus for evaluating properties of carbon fibers using capacitance sensing |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
| AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
| AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
| AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
| DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
| ENP | Entry into the national phase in: |
Ref country code: JP Ref document number: 2001 503522 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 10009804 Country of ref document: US |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase in: |
Ref country code: GB Ref document number: 200200404 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
| REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |