WO1997013138A2 - Surface tension measurement in a pressurized environment - Google Patents
Surface tension measurement in a pressurized environment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1997013138A2 WO1997013138A2 PCT/US1996/015923 US9615923W WO9713138A2 WO 1997013138 A2 WO1997013138 A2 WO 1997013138A2 US 9615923 W US9615923 W US 9615923W WO 9713138 A2 WO9713138 A2 WO 9713138A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- surface tension
- pressure
- liquid
- vessel
- reactor
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N13/00—Investigating surface or boundary effects, e.g. wetting power; Investigating diffusion effects; Analysing materials by determining surface, boundary, or diffusion effects
- G01N13/02—Investigating surface tension of liquids
Definitions
- Electronic hardware peak detection circuits have a number of further limitations when certain pneumatic conditions change the differential pressure waveform by generating false peaks that trigger the hardware peak detector.
- Hardware peak detectors can false trigger (see Fig. 4) on pressure signal fluctuations that are caused by capillary action when 0.1mm I.D. and larger orifices are used in the small orifice position.
- Greater pneumatic pressures required to overcome the increased hydrodynamic resistance at an orifice can cause unstable or noisy waveforms.
- the electronic hardware peak detector will also false trigger on waveform noise oscillations that result when the measured test fluid is pressurized.
- Mass flow controllers required to operate in an increasing pressurized environment, cause a maximum bubble pressure waveform that becomes increasingly unstable between bubbles (Fig. 6). Large oscillations occur following the release of each bubble before the system stabilizes and the next bubble is blown.
- the bubble rate remains constant once the flow rate is set with mass flow controllers.
- the maximum bubble pressure remains constant and therefore surface tension remains constant, bubble rate will decrease (slow down) with increasing pressure (see Figs. 4 and 6).
- Electronic hardware peak detection circuits are further limited in responding to various amplitude and frequency changes of the maximum bubble pressure waveform, and waveform shapes will change as bubble rate is changed, and as fluid viscosity increases.
- the waveform flows a sawtooth configuration (Fig. 4) where a linear positive slope follows the increase in pressure as the bubble is formed up to its maximum bubble pressure point.
- a sha ⁇ drop negative downslope
- the positive slope is commonly referred to as the "surface age" of the bubble, while the rest is commonly referred to as "dead time" (Fig. 5).
- An ideal hardware peak detector should track only the surface age (positive) portion of the sawtooth wave until it reaches a valid maximum, capture that maximum value, trigger a reset signal by detecting the subsequent drop (negative downslope), and then track the next valid peak.
- the dead time of a sawtooth waveform is finite and depends on the rheology of the fluid, the diameter and configuration of the orifice, and the pressure characteristics of the mass flow controllers. As bubble rate increases, dead time becomes a greater proportion of the peak-to-peak bubble interval time. At one bubble per second (Fig. 4) the surface age typically is in excess of ninety percent of the bubble interval, while at thirty five or more bubbles per second, the surface age can be less than ten percent of the bubble interval (Fig. 5).
- Mass flow controllers are set for a specific flow rate when an instrument is set up and calibrated; however, bubble rate will change if surface tension of the fluid changes, even though flow rate stays fixed.
- a peak detector must be flexible enough to cover all possible bubble ranges. For example, a flow setting that produces one bubble per second in water, with surface tension in the 70+dynes/cm. range, produces more than three bubbles per second in alcohol, with surface tension typically in the 20 plus dynes/cm range. The waveform amplitude in alcohol is much smaller due to lower surface tension of alcohol.
- Electronic peak detection circuits lack capability to ignore various noise oscillations and signal combinations as described.
- an advanced software peak detection program is provided to solve problems encountered using hardware peak detection and to allow for accurate surface tension measurement.
- the resulting software program used in the present invention can be extended, with minor hardware modifications, to the accurate surface tension measurement of viscous fluids and fluids with high solids content in both ambient and under pressurized conditions.
- This purging capability can also be used as a means to unplug the probes during the normal production cycle, if needed.
- the maximum average of the signal from the large orifice is electronically subtracted from the maximum average of the signal from the small orifice to provide an extremely accurate maximum differential bubble pressure value, directly proportional to surface tension.
- the ratio of the bubble rates can be set to make the surface tension value independent of viscosity effects. This is applicable in both non-pressurized and pressurized environments.
- This mechanical means includes a porous basket at the end of probe which mitigates the effect of shearing or turbulence (which would otherwise be detrimental to the free information of bubbles at the probe orifices) from the flow or mixing of the fluid in the vessel, reactor, or pipe, while at the same time allowing the free, non-turbulent flow of the fluid past the tension orifices and associated temperature or other measurement probes.
- Fig. 1 is a combined pneumatic and electrical block diagram showing the components comprising the preferred embodiment of the invention using a single differential pressure transducer and two mass flow controllers
- Fig. 2 is a combined pneumatic and electronic block diagram similar to Fig. 1 illustrating the components comprising an alternative arrangement using two differential pressure transducers and three mass flow controllers;
- Fig. 3 is a cross sectional view of a modular probe assembly for use in both pressurized and non-pressurized vessels, reactors, or process pipe sections, showing means for using standard and replaceable small and large orifice probes and other process monitoring probes such as temperature and conductivity;
- Fig. 3A is a side elevational view of the probe of Fig. 3 and
- Fig. 3B is a plan view of the probe of Fig. 3;
- Fig. 4 is a waveform diagram of a normal maximum differential bubble pressure waveform showing three distinct hardware peak detector trigger signals: a valid peak at the maximum bubble pressure point (A); a false peak on a zero crossing (B); and a false peak on a capillary action (C);
- Fig. 5 is a waveform diagram of a normal differential bubble pressure waveform at thirty five bubbles per second showing the surface age and dead time;
- Fig. 6 is a waveform diagram of a normal maximum differential bubble pressure waveform in water under 175 PSIG pressure showing the signal oscillating after each bubble is released;
- Fig. 7 is an idealized pressure waveform showing the normal peak and falling edge that occurs as each bubble forms and is released at an orifice:
- Fig. 8 is an idealized pressure waveform showing a valid and false peak due to a capillary action
- Fig. 9 is an idealized pressure waveform shooing the peak average of the software peak detection algorithm and the tolerance window;
- Fig. 10 is a dynamic surface tension plot for two different fluids;
- Fig. 11 is a system block diagram showing the process for measuring surface tension using the components of Fig. 1 ;
- Fig. 12 is a system block diagram showing the process for measuring surface using the components shown in Fig. 2;
- Fig. 13 is a simplified software flowchart showing the overall system for software peak detection
- Figs. 14A and 14B together comprise a more detailed software flow diagram of the advanced software peak detection routine of the present invention
- Figs. 15A and 15B together comprise a software flow diagram of a software routine for detecting peak signals during bubbling
- Fig. 16 is a software flow diagram for detecting maximum and minimum values in a detection group
- Fig. 17 is a simplified block diagram representing the software routine for sorting values
- Figs. 18A and 18B together comprise a software routine for calculating the results of the surface tension measurement.
- an apparatus for determining the surface tension of a liquid in a pressurized environment includes a source of high pressure nitrogen or process gas (4) which is connected through appropriate high pressure tubing, fittings, or hoses to a pressure regulator means (5).
- the invention includes means to accept a high input pressure source and reduce the pressure, as may be necessary to provide a corresponding precise output mass flow control of the process gas, to the probe assembly, using one mass flow controller (mass flow controller) per orifice (6, 7), and where necessary, a third mass flow controller (8) as used in the two transducer (10, 11) scheme as illustrated in Figs. 2 and 12.
- the mass flow controllers used in one embodiment of the invention is a MKS Model 1261 rated for constant mass flow in the range from 0 to 100 milliliters (SCCM) per minute.
- SCCM milliliters
- each orifice is connected to the -ve port with each +ve transducer port tied together and connected to the third mass flow controller (8), using a cross fitting (18) and then vented to the pressure reactor atmosphere through an open vent fitting (17) or a third tube.
- the outputs of the surface tension apparatus are connected to pressurized tubing sections (20) that run to the reactor probe assembly, using high pressure tube fittings (21) welded to the top of the flange (22).
- the flange is designed for, and applicable to, the particular vessel, reactor, or process pipe.
- the small and large orifice probes are similarly connected and suspended from similar flange-welded tube fittings (21) on the underside of the flange and supported from lengths of commercially available, fractional size, tubing (23), typically 0.25" or 6 mm. O.D.
- These tubes are housed within an elongated, perforated, protective rigid pipe or tube (24), threaded into a half coupling welded to the underside of the flange, that allows varying the total length and therefore the depth of penetration of the probes in the fluid by varying the length of the external pipe section and the internal connecting tubes, to suit the particular application.
- This arrangement is suitable for top or bottom installation, and side installation with minor modifications.
- a protective, ventilated or perforated, closed end "basket” arrangement (24), threaded onto the end of the protective pipe section through a standard pipe coupling (25), mitigates the effect of shearing or turbulence from the flow or mixing of the fluid in the vessel, reactor, or pipe, while at the same time allowing the free, non-turbulent flow of the fluid past the tension orifices and associated temperature (15), or other measurement probe.
- Additional internal tubing spacers (26) provide rigidity to the system within the external pipe assembly and prevent movement of the probes within protective basket.
- Standard tube fittings allow replacement and interchange of probes and probe materials, including, but not limited to, glass, stainless steel, coated glass and steel, as well as straight or inverted probes.
- the tubing is pressure sealed, particularly for temperature and other process measuring probes so as to prevent fluid ingress into the probes and associated electrical wiring.
- the entire assembly is modular in nature for ease of assembly and disassembly for replacement and cleaning between process or production runs.
- the temperature probe (15) is provided to sense temperature of the liquid under test since surface tension of a liquid is temperature dependent in an inverse relationship. As temperature of the liquid goes up, surface tension decreases.
- An algorithm for surface tension versus temperature relationship for two standard calibration fluids is included in the software, so that during the calibration sequence the computer program reads the temperature of the calibration fluid being used and automatically inputs the correct surface tension value.
- Typical standard calibration fluids are deionized water and ethyl alcohol.
- This algorithm can also be used to temperature compensate surface tension values during operation.
- the software program inco ⁇ orates a sequential automatic flow control setting/calibration sequence that allows the automatic generation of dynamic surface tension curves for tested fluids that contain active surfactants (Fig. 10).
- the mass flow controllers are pre-programmed to sequence through a series of flow controller setting (i.e. 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 percent of full rating, for example) which result in five different and sequentially increasing bubble rates.
- the probes are immersed in a high standard calibration fluid (deionized water) and the program sequences through the different flow settings in a step-by-step procedure, pausing a sufficient period of time to allow analyzation of the differential pressure waveforms and the automatic input of the correct surface tension value for the high standard calibration fluid. This is repeated for the low standard calibration fluid (ethyl alcohol).
- the low standard calibration fluid ethyl alcohol
- Various test fluids are subsequently measured at these different flow rates and the resultant surface tension and bubble frequency data is plotted to give accurate dynamic surface tension curves (Fig. 10).
- a power supply (9) provides operational power to the mass flow controller's.
- the mass flow controller input and output control signals are routed, with analog input and output control signals from transducer demodulator circuits (12), the temperature probe (15), and other sensors, to analog input and output interface boards (14) located in the computer (13) for processing by the software program. Since there is a maximum practical distance that the apparatus can be mounted away from the probe assembly and still retain signal sensitivity and desired accuracy, remote control of the apparatus and mass flow controllers is important in hazardous and explosive gas environments.
- a specific example is application of the apparatus to monitor and control a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) polymerization reactor using combustible, vinyl chloride gas in the reaction process.
- the apparatus is mounted in an explosion-proof housing, and/or in a nitrogen purged enclosure, as may be required by local safety codes and/or standards.
- the equipment arrangement in Fig. 2 allows correcting for viscosity effects.
- An estimation of the hydrodynamic resistance of a fluid against a moving bubble is done using Stokes law for a viscous resistance of a liquid.
- the correction value to calculated surface tension value which is the difference between measured value of dynamic surface tension and the real value, is estimated by the following relationship
- ⁇ is the viscosity of the liquid
- ⁇ is the surface tension of the liquid
- r is the radius of the orifice
- T is the surface age
- r is the small orifice radius and r 2 is the large orifice radius.
- This advanced software peak detection program has the means to measure the maximum bubble pressure from a demodulator output signal that can be either unipolar or bipolar (both positive, or positive and negative). It can measure fluids under pressure, with provisions to reject false peaks caused by capillary action and other oscillations. It can measure surface tension with provisions to reject false peaks in very viscous fluids, and correct for viscosity effects, both in ambient and pressurized conditions.
- Standard software peak detection techniques cannot distinguish between valid peaks and peaks that are caused by noise (Fig. 8). Therefore, it was necessary to develop this extension to the standard software peak detection.
- the new advanced software peak detection algorithm uses the average of all valid peaks to compare each newly detected peak to it. Therefore, it has the ability to evaluate each newly detected peak as being valid or invalid. The user of the software has been given the flexibility to influence this detection by selecting the degree to which detected peaks are accepted as valid.
- the system consists of two main parts, which are themselves divided into sub-systems (Fig. 13 through Fig. 18).
- the two main parts are: (1 ) Differential pressure signal analyzation, and (2) Differential pressure signal peak detection.
- the signal has to be analyzed, meaning the standard software peak detection is used to detect a certain number of peaks. With these peak values the correct average can be determined, and is used from this point on in the advanced peak detection algorithm.
- the differential pressure signal is represented in the computer by individual integral numbers. See Figs. 14A and 14B. Eight consecutive numbers make up a detection group. See Fig. 16. Out of each detection group, the maximum and minimum values are determined, also, their indices in the memory buffer are stored. The maximum values are used to detect peaks in this algorithm in the following described procedure.
- a falling edge (Fig. 7) is defined by: 1.
- the difference between maximum and minimum value has to be higher than 366 mV (+150 integral), to avoid detection of noise peaks.
- the index of the minimum value has to be higher than the index of the maximum value, i.e. the minimum value has to appear after the maximum value in the same detection group.
- the maximum value out of the current detection group is compared to the maximum value out of the preceding detection group. This is an important step, as well as a unique feature to this algorithm during peak detection, as the peak can appear in a detection group I (Fig. 7) but the falling edge is detected in detection group II. Using this condition, it is verified that a highly accurate peak value is delivered by the peak detection algorithm.
- Tolerance window WIDE - 20 peaks After the necessary number of peaks are detected and stored, the peaks are sorted by value, in this case by using the bubble sort algorithm (Fig. 17). This algorithm is not restricted to one sorting method. After the sort, the highest value in the analyzation array is in the top of the buffer, the lowest in the bottom.
- the correct peak average is calculated. Independently from the tolerance window setting, the five highest values are always used for the average calculation. This is derived from a differential pressure signal that consists of valid peaks and peaks from capillary actions (invalid peaks). This case can be considered the worst case, as there are an even number of valid, high peaks, and invalid, low peaks. By considering only the upper part of the analyzation array, only the valid peak values are used for the average calculation. This concludes the analyzation.
- the detected peak value is compared to the current average of all the previous valid peak values. For this comparison, a so-called tolerance window is applied. To compare the detected peak value to the current peak value average, the absolute value of the difference of peak value and peak average must be lower than the tolerance value:
- ABS(peak_value - peak average) ⁇ tolerance value If the result of this equation is True, the peak can be accepted as valid. In this case, the new result for surface tension can be calculated.
- the user adjustable tolerance window is a very unique feature of this software. See Figs. 8 and 9. With this window, two things are now possible:
- Peaks that are caused by capillary actions can be rejected, so that they have no effect on the surface tension results.
- Peaks caused by capillary action have typically a peak value that is about 20% of that of peaks that appear when a bubble releases (Fig. 8). With a standard peak detection algorithm, these two peaks cannot be differentiated, causing incorrect results for surface tension, as well as for bubble frequency. With advanced peak detection, applying the tolerance window, peaks can be differentiated (Fig. 9).
- the tolerance window is a value range of ⁇ tolerance around the peak average. The valid peak that is within the tolerance window can be accepted while the capillary action is rejected.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials Using Thermal Means (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)
- Measuring Fluid Pressure (AREA)
- Measuring Volume Flow (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19681587T DE19681587C2 (en) | 1995-10-04 | 1996-10-03 | Measurement of surface tension in an environment under pressure |
JP9514451A JPH11513492A (en) | 1995-10-04 | 1996-10-03 | Measurement of surface tension in pressurized environment |
US09/043,952 US6085577A (en) | 1996-10-03 | 1996-10-03 | Surface tension measurement in a pressurized environment |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US476395P | 1995-10-04 | 1995-10-04 | |
US60/004,763 | 1995-10-04 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1997013138A2 true WO1997013138A2 (en) | 1997-04-10 |
WO1997013138A3 WO1997013138A3 (en) | 1997-08-21 |
Family
ID=21712409
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1996/015923 WO1997013138A2 (en) | 1995-10-04 | 1996-10-03 | Surface tension measurement in a pressurized environment |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPH11513492A (en) |
DE (1) | DE19681587C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997013138A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6772103B1 (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 2004-08-03 | Dow Global Technologies Inc. | Method for selecting a parts kit detail |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3426584A (en) * | 1967-03-24 | 1969-02-11 | North American Rockwell | Surface tension measuring instrument |
US3765227A (en) * | 1970-10-01 | 1973-10-16 | J Campbell | Apparatus for the determination of surface tension of liquids |
US4416148A (en) * | 1981-02-06 | 1983-11-22 | Madison-Kipp Corporation | Surface tensiometer |
US4527421A (en) * | 1984-01-13 | 1985-07-09 | The Dow Chemical Company | Dynamic surface tensiometry and method |
CA2098860C (en) * | 1992-07-06 | 1997-03-25 | John Mchardy | Method and apparatus for detecting the position of liquid-liquid interfaces |
US5406828A (en) * | 1993-11-16 | 1995-04-18 | Yellowstone Environmental Science, Inc. | Method and apparatus for pressure and level transmission and sensing |
-
1996
- 1996-10-03 WO PCT/US1996/015923 patent/WO1997013138A2/en active Application Filing
- 1996-10-03 JP JP9514451A patent/JPH11513492A/en active Pending
- 1996-10-03 DE DE19681587T patent/DE19681587C2/en not_active Revoked
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6772103B1 (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 2004-08-03 | Dow Global Technologies Inc. | Method for selecting a parts kit detail |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE19681587T1 (en) | 1998-10-08 |
WO1997013138A3 (en) | 1997-08-21 |
DE19681587C2 (en) | 2003-08-14 |
JPH11513492A (en) | 1999-11-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6085577A (en) | Surface tension measurement in a pressurized environment | |
US5272646A (en) | Method for locating leaks in a fluid pipeline and apparatus therefore | |
AU2004325253B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining flow pressure using density information | |
KR940701534A (en) | Method and apparatus for determining mechanical zero value for a Coriolis instrument | |
US20030010126A1 (en) | Non-intrusive method and device for characterising flow pertubations of a fluid inside a pipe | |
US20050273278A1 (en) | Program product to measure density, specific gravity, and flow rate of fluids | |
US6234019B1 (en) | System and method for determining a density of a fluid | |
WO2008016697A2 (en) | Method for monitoring a flowing fluid | |
JP5110878B2 (en) | Process pressure sensor calibration | |
JP3263400B2 (en) | Device for dynamically measuring the surface tension of liquids | |
US6619141B2 (en) | Method of dynamically compensating a process signal | |
CN201858993U (en) | Device for measuring flow quantity of double-directional unstable fluid flow | |
Carlander et al. | Installation effects on an ultrasonic flow meter with implications for self diagnostics | |
EP1384977A3 (en) | Level switch with verification capability | |
US4674322A (en) | On-line instrument for simultaneously measuring the viscosity, density, and surface tension of a fluid comprising a gas dissolved in a liquid | |
NO332802B1 (en) | Salinity independent multiphase paint | |
WO2003083463A2 (en) | Apparatus and method for electrochemical detection and control of inorganic scale | |
WO1997013138A2 (en) | Surface tension measurement in a pressurized environment | |
US4584868A (en) | Apparatus for determining the supercompressibility factor of a flowing gas | |
US4020677A (en) | Apparatus for determining salinity of fluids | |
US4393451A (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring total liquid volume flow | |
JPS648290B2 (en) | ||
US12061105B2 (en) | Method for operating a flow measuring point for media having at least one liquid phase | |
CN113358290B (en) | Stainless steel sealing detection method based on helium mass spectrometer leak detector | |
CN111609902B (en) | Production test device and method for non-full pipe flowmeter |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): DE JP US |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): DE JP US |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 1997 514451 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 09043952 Country of ref document: US |
|
RET | De translation (de og part 6b) |
Ref document number: 19681587 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19981008 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 19681587 Country of ref document: DE |