US8380988B2 - Embedded self-contained security commands - Google Patents
Embedded self-contained security commands Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US8380988B2 US8380988B2 US12/184,480 US18448008A US8380988B2 US 8380988 B2 US8380988 B2 US 8380988B2 US 18448008 A US18448008 A US 18448008A US 8380988 B2 US8380988 B2 US 8380988B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- security
- command
- commands
- security rights
- secure session
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/30—Authentication, i.e. establishing the identity or authorisation of security principals
- G06F21/31—User authentication
Definitions
- the invention relates generally to security within microprocessor-controlled devices and more particularly to implementing security configuration changes with single communication commands.
- their computer networks may range in scale from hundreds of thousands of electronic devices including for example laptops, personal computers, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), Internet enabled cellular telephones, etc. distributed globally, to a couple of devices operated within a restricted geographic area.
- PDAs Personal Digital Assistants
- green computer typically refers to a computer that enters low-power mode following a specified period of inactivity.
- techniques to remotely power on “sleeping” electronic devices have become available through commercial activities such as MAGIC PACKETTM, led by Advanced Micro Devices® and Hewlett Packard®. Equally, others have addressed remotely powering down electronic devices, such as for example Angelo et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 6,119,228 “Method for Securely Communicating Remote Control Commands in a Computer Network”, to prevent unauthorized access.
- the network administrator may inadvertently provide access to an untrusted user who can access and utilize the electronic device whilst the administrator's rights are established.
- the untrusted user may be physically present or be represented by malware established on the trusted user's electronic device, awaiting such admninistrator access prior to activating.
- malware could for example then take control of the electronic device by resetting passwords, security rights etc, and communicating sensitive data or security information to another party.
- the trusted user may themselves exploit the temporary access to copy, move, delete or modify information that would otherwise be protected or invisible to them.
- Angelo U.S. Pat. No.
- Various embodiments of the invention provide methods and systems for receiving a first command comprising a data portion, and extracting from the data portion a security rights modification command set comprising a command for initiating a secure session and for closing the secure session, where the security rights modification command set is configured for modifying security parameters during the secure session.
- Some of the security parameters may be modified only during a secure session; and the security rights modification command set can be automatically executed, absent other security rights commands being executed during execution of the security rights modification command set.
- various devices may be provided, for example a port for receiving the first command, and a processor for extracting the security rights modification command set.
- the processor may be configured for establishing a processor environment where commands other than those within the security rights modification command set are other than executable, and for executing the security rights modification command set absent other security rights commands being executed during execution of the security rights modification command set.
- the security rights modification commands include serialization data for identifying and ordering said security rights modification commands.
- the security rights modification commands may be stored within a memory, and receiving the first command may indicate a set of security rights modification commands whereby the indication is extracted from the first command.
- the set of security rights modification commands may be executed in dependence of the extracted indication, for modifying security parameters during the secure session, some of the security parameters for being modified only during a secure session; and, for closing the secure session absent at least one of another security rights command being executed and another secure session being initiated during the secure session.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary transfer of an embedded security command using a removable memory storage device.
- FIG. 2A illustrates an exemplary transfer of a generic embedded security command using the Internet as interconnecting network between administrator and user.
- FIG. 2B illustrates an exemplary transfer of device-specific embedded security commands using the Internet as interconnecting network between administrator and user.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary flow diagram of a user's electronic device receiving and executing an embedded security command.
- FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary embedded command structure and extracted commands.
- FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary flow diagram of a security command process with pre-loaded serialized commands within single security session.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary flow diagram of a security command process as part of a log-in process.
- an Information Systems (IS) administrator 105 wishes to change the security privileges of the users, including user 135 , of an enterprise's electronic information technology systems, not shown for clarity.
- the IS administrator 105 accesses the administrator system 110 and defines the required security amendments for the user 135 .
- the security amendment command is embedded within a command that is compatible with an interface of the user's electronic device 130 , which accepts a removable storage medium 120 .
- This embedded security amendment command 115 is then transferred to the removable storage medium 120 by the IS administrator 105 , whereupon the removable storage medium 120 is provided to the user 135 either directly or indirectly via shipping.
- the user 135 Upon receipt of the removable storage medium 120 the user 135 inserts the removable storage medium 120 into the appropriate interface port of the user's electronic device 130 , whereupon the embedded security amendment command 115 is recognized and transferred to the user's electronic device 130 as executing embedded security command 125 .
- the executing embedded security command 125 establishes itself as the sole process operating on the user's electronic device 130 , extracts the embedded security command, executes it, and then terminates the process.
- a delete command 140 is, optionally, provided to the removable storage medium 120 from the user's electronic device 130 .
- the exemplary transfer 100 results in the security process operating on the user's electronic device 130 and/or security settings being updated in a single step without interaction of the user 135 or IS administrator 105 during the execution activity.
- the security process reduces the risk of malware attacks or executions.
- executing embedded security command 125 disables user input devices such as keyboard, microphone, mouse etc to remove potential for the user 135 to abuse any rights temporarily established in the execution of the executing embedded security command 125 .
- the exemplary transfer 100 exploits a removable storage medium 120 that is for example a flash memory device, a secure digital memory card, a smartcard, or a compact, low cost memory device.
- result data detailing success or failure of the security rights process is stored in the security commands' place. It will be evident that when erasing of the data is not considered important, that unerasable media such as compact disks, DVDs, and other write-once media are suitable for the data transfer.
- FIG. 2A an electronic transfer 200 A is shown in respect of providing security updates to electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 .
- an IS administrator 205 accesses an IS administrator system 210 to initiate the policy revision.
- the security policy command is embedded within another command, in a format accepted by the plurality of electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 .
- a resulting generic embedded security command 215 is then distributed to the electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 from the IS administrator system 210 .
- the generic embedded security command 215 propagates across a World Wide Web 220 to a local router 250 wherein it is distributed to the electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 . As shown, the generic embedded security command 215 is therefore provided to WiMAX router 230 , laptop 240 , Global Navigation device 260 , multi-media player 270 , and PDA 280 .
- each of the electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 Upon receipt of the generic embedded security command 215 each of the electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 extracts the security command, disables all other processes, executes the security command process to modify security parameters, and terminates the security command process before returning control to the user or network as appropriate according to the nature of the plurality of electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 .
- a secure session is established such that the security command process establishes administrator access rights to perform the modifications to the security processes, and then closes the administrator access and secure session before returning control of the processor.
- the establishment and termination of the administrator access rights includes the logging in and logging out of the administrator.
- the security policy command is a plurality of commands which are extracted and executed within the secure session, such a security rights command set allowing modification of a single right or alternatively a plurality of rights to be modified within the security process or secure session.
- the access privilege of a single user may be modified in the session or the access privileges for each user of a user group may be modified in the session.
- the security command update is executed without interrupting existing activities on each of the plurality of electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 ; in this case the security process is executed in the background without knowledge of the user.
- a message is provided upon completion of the security update to advise the user that their security policy has been revised or amended.
- the security policy generator process executing on the IS administrator system 210 generates a device-specific command for each of the plurality of electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 , as shown in exemplary transfer 200 B.
- the security policy generator process generates router command 235 for the WiMAX router 230 , computer command 245 for the laptop 240 , GPS command 265 for the Global Navigation device 260 , media command 275 for the multi-media player 270 , and an assistant command 285 for the PDA 280 .
- Each of the plurality of security embedded commands 235 , 245 , 265 , 275 , and 285 are distributed via the World Wide Web 220 and local router 250 to the plurality of electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 .
- each device Upon receiving and detecting the appropriately formatted command each device extracts the embedded security command and executes same.
- Such commands optionally provide additional security elements during their execution, including the temporary disabling of input devices, temporary disabling of network access, notification of completion or failure of security update, and user notification.
- a single standard command is issued to the plurality of electronic devices 230 , 240 , 260 , 270 and 280 but each of the plurality of security embedded commands 235 , 245 , 265 , 275 , and 285 is formatted according to the interfaces supported by each of the plurality of electronic devices 230 , 240 , 250 , 260 , 270 and 280 .
- the format will reflect that some of the electronic devices are operating on different operating systems, such as for example Apple Mac OS X®, Microsoft Windows®, Microsoft Vista®, Sun SolarisTM, and Linux.
- Exemplary sequence 300 begins with a start 301 , such that a process is active within an electronic device intended to receive and process security protocol updates according to an embodiment of the invention.
- a standard command occurs wherein the operating process recognizes that the command has associated data that is an embedded command of the security policy process.
- the standard command comprises a login command to initiate an administration session.
- the process then proceeds to extract the embedded command at step 303 and decipher the command in step 304 .
- Information necessary for deciphering the embedded command has previously been established on the electronic device, for example at initial supply to a user or subsequently via another security process download.
- step 304 thereby results in the security policy process beginning at step 305 and performing security amendments at step 306 .
- the process closes at step 307 .
- step 308 the embedded command is removed from the electronic device, for example using a secure delete process, and thereupon at optional step 309 the received standard command is also removed from the electronic device, again for example by a secure delete process.
- step 310 ends, whereupon it returns to step 301 to await a subsequent policy update.
- the command hierarchy 400 comprises a plurality of public commands, including public domain command 410 , which are for example embedded security amendment commands 115 of FIG. 1 or one of a plurality of security embedded commands 235 , 245 , 265 , 275 , and 285 of FIG. 2B .
- Public domain command 410 comprises a header 411 , a data field 412 and a footer 413 .
- the header 411 and footer 413 represent standard command elements of a format that communicates the security policy update command to the electronic device, for example a command supported by a Universal Serial Bus (USB), Advanced Technology Attachment (ATA), I2C interface, HTML or SMTP protocol, etc.
- USB Universal Serial Bus
- ATA Advanced Technology Attachment
- I2C interface HyperText Transfer Protocol
- HTML or SMTP protocol etc.
- the data field 412 rather than being data associated with the public domain command 410 as normally employed, comprises an encrypted embedded security command 420 .
- the encrypted embedded security command 420 has a format such that a process receiving the public domain command 410 can identify the data field 412 as the encrypted embedded security command 420 , rather than data associated with the public domain command 410 .
- Decryption of the encrypted embedded security command 420 results in a deciphered command 421 , deciphered command data 422 and a digital certificate 423 .
- the digital certificate 423 is employed by the security process to further validate the security policy command as originating from a valid authority. Alternatively, an element such as the digital certificate 423 is optionally omitted.
- the deciphered command 421 and the deciphered command data 422 together provide a security command 430 to the electronic device.
- the security command 430 comprises a security command start 431 with associated first process data 432 , a security command run 433 with new security data 434 , and a security command end 435 with second process data 436 .
- the security command start comprises a login command to initiate an administration session.
- the first process data 432 and the second process data 436 are optionally employed and relate to processes to be suspended and restarted respectively before and after execution of the security command run 433 .
- the first process data 432 suspends wired and wireless network access during modification of security protocols and establishment of a new enterprise server, identified in the new security data 434 , and the second process data 436 restarts only wired network access and provides a security lock on wireless network access.
- the first process data 432 suspends Microsoft Outlook® and disables the keyboard of the electronic device, such as that of PDA 280 , before the security command run 433 establishes the new policy rules for Microsoft Outlook®, which includes the encryption and provision of an SSL certificate for authentification of electronic mail generated by the user with Microsoft Outlook®.
- the SSL certificate is the digital certificate 423 .
- the second process data 436 resumes operation of Microsoft Outlook® to the user and enables the keyboard of the PDA 280 .
- the security session has been described in respect of a single security session performed in conjunction with extracting a series of security commands embedded within a single command.
- FIG. 5 another exemplary embodiment is presented wherein the single security session is executed using a plurality of serialized security commands that have been pre-loaded.
- the exemplary security rights update 500 begins with a start 501 , such that a security rights process is already active within an electronic device, and performs according to previously established rights and is intended to receive and process security protocol updates according to an embodiment of the invention.
- a series of security commands are received by the electronic device and are recognized by the already executing security rights process and are loaded awaiting execution, each security command being serialized with unique serialization data.
- step 503 the process receives a security command to initiate a security rights process, and accordingly initiates the security process. Accordingly the executing security process does not allow the loading of any additional security commands or other commands during execution thereof, thereby preventing a malware attack which upon recognizing the executing security process attempts to insert an additional security process command or replace an existing command.
- the process flow then proceeds to step 504 and extracts embedded serialization data to the sequence of security commands to execute. Upon extracting this series the process proceeds to step 505 and verifies that an existing loaded command with the matching serialization data exists. Having verified the security command this security command is then executed at step 506 from which point the process moves to step 507 to determine whether additional commands remain to be executed. Upon determining that other commands exist the process returns to step 505 and verifies the next security command serial number prior to executing it within step 506 .
- the security rights update 500 prevents a malware attack from inserting commands once in execution, as no new external commands are loaded or executed, and also provides for verification that the appropriate number of commands and their specific unique serial numbers are present prior to execution of them. In this manner the insertion by malware of a Trojan command into a security rights process update prior to its execution is prevented as the serialization of the commands being executed must be correct, such that random insertion of serialization data into the Trojan command has a very low probability of matching a valid command.
- result data detailing success or failure of the security rights process is stored in the security commands' place. The result data is then transmitted back to IS administrator.
- serialization data is a unique serial number associated with each security command and the serialization command may be the list of serial numbers in order to execute.
- serialization data relates to linking the security commands together such that only the correct serialization commands form the valid security command to be executed, by way of analogy a hundred puzzle pieces are provided but only ten can be assembled to form a picture.
- the loading of the security commands prior to receipt of the command to initiate the security process is achieved for example by downloading a plurality of encrypted and embedded commands distributed over a period of time from a communications network, by connecting a security module containing the commands to the electronic device, or by a combination of such methods.
- a small group of desired security commands are provided in conjunction with a large number of masking security commands, the masking security commands being indistinguishable from the desired commands but are not called by their serial numbers.
- a limited number of desired security commands is distributable randomly through a large number of downloaded commands.
- the downloaded commands that provide masking of the desired security commands may be the standard command with random data within the data field, the standard command with security commands with invalid fields, and standard commands with security commands with valid fields but unused serial numbers. Such masking further limiting the ability of malware attacks as the valid security commands form only a small percentage of the commands transmitted to the electronic device.
- the security commands are embedded within a login process or command.
- a login process or command Such an exemplary embodiment is presented in FIG. 6 wherein a single security session is executed from a plurality of possible security sessions, each security session using a plurality of serialized security commands.
- the security session may be a single embedded command from within the dataset as outlined supra in respect of FIGS. 3 and 4 .
- a login triggered single security session 600 begins with a start 601 .
- the system boots and triggers in step 603 a login request.
- the system may be active and the login trigger for step 603 is not a system boot but a request to change the user or a request to reconfirm a current user.
- the result of the login trigger is received, being a user identity and login credentials, whereupon the single security session moves to step 605 and extracts a security command from a dataset of potential security commands.
- the security command selected being determined in dependence of the user identity and login credentials presented in step 604 .
- step 606 The process then proceeds to step 606 and initiates the security process. Accordingly the executing security process does not allow the loading of any additional security commands or other commands during execution thereof, thereby preventing a malware attack, which upon recognizing the executing security process attempts to insert an additional security process command or replace an existing command.
- the process flow then proceeds to step 607 and extracts an embedded string of serial numbers relating to the sequence of security commands to execute. Upon extracting this series the process proceeds to step 620 and loads the security command with the identified security number before this security command is verified in step 619 . Having verified the security command serial number this security command is then executed at step 618 from which point the process moves to step 617 to determine whether additional commands remain to be executed. Upon determining that other commands exist the process returns to step 620 and the loop repeats until the last command has been executed.
- step 617 Upon determining in step 617 that the last command has been executed the process moves to step 616 and deletes the loaded and executed security commands wherein the security process moves to step 615 and closes itself, before ending at step 614 and returning to the start 601 .
- the closure of the security process results in the system executing its normal processes that would be performed in response to a successful login.
- the loaded and executed security commands are not deleted upon completion of the last security command but are either deleted immediately upon execution or stored for another security process to access. Additionally it would be evident that the security process may exploit a single command embedded within another command such as presented supra in respect of FIG. 4 .
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Storage Device Security (AREA)
- Computer And Data Communications (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (24)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/184,480 US8380988B2 (en) | 2007-08-08 | 2008-08-01 | Embedded self-contained security commands |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US93534607P | 2007-08-08 | 2007-08-08 | |
US12/184,480 US8380988B2 (en) | 2007-08-08 | 2008-08-01 | Embedded self-contained security commands |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090044250A1 US20090044250A1 (en) | 2009-02-12 |
US8380988B2 true US8380988B2 (en) | 2013-02-19 |
Family
ID=40340906
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/184,480 Active 2031-01-28 US8380988B2 (en) | 2007-08-08 | 2008-08-01 | Embedded self-contained security commands |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8380988B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2186255A4 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009018654A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105550598A (en) * | 2015-12-25 | 2016-05-04 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Safety management method and device of mobile storage equipment |
US10516675B2 (en) | 2017-01-17 | 2019-12-24 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Altering application security to support just-in-time access |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2650014A1 (en) | 2006-04-25 | 2007-04-25 | Secure Network Systems, Llc | Logical and physical security |
US20110314515A1 (en) * | 2009-01-06 | 2011-12-22 | Hernoud Melanie S | Integrated physical and logical security management via a portable device |
US20120064921A1 (en) | 2009-03-06 | 2012-03-15 | Hernoud Melani S | Systems and methods for mobile tracking, communications and alerting |
US8412945B2 (en) | 2011-08-09 | 2013-04-02 | CloudPassage, Inc. | Systems and methods for implementing security in a cloud computing environment |
US9497224B2 (en) | 2011-08-09 | 2016-11-15 | CloudPassage, Inc. | Systems and methods for implementing computer security |
CN106330884A (en) * | 2016-08-19 | 2017-01-11 | 浪潮集团有限公司 | A security management method for realizing alarm, locking and data destruction |
US20200213383A1 (en) * | 2018-12-31 | 2020-07-02 | Didi Research America, Llc | Methods and systems for remotely executing, or facilitating the executing of, security commands |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1997015008A1 (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-04-24 | At & T Ipm Corp. | System and method for database access control |
US5956715A (en) | 1994-12-13 | 1999-09-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for controlling user access to a resource in a networked computing environment |
US20020019931A1 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2002-02-14 | Rainor Prinoth | Security service layer |
GB2365598A (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2002-02-20 | Hewlett Packard Co | Establishing a secure environment for a software process |
US20030163510A1 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2003-08-28 | Bob Janssen | Method of administering user access to application programs on a computer system |
US20030167280A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2003-09-04 | Drexel University | Database system for laboratory management and knowledge exchange |
EP1475978A1 (en) | 2003-05-07 | 2004-11-10 | M-Stack Limited | Apparatus and method of handling simultaneous UTRAN radio resource control procedures which change the security configuration in a UMTS user equipment |
US20050039178A1 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2005-02-17 | Sunil Marolia | System and method for downloading update packages into a mobile handset in a carrier network |
GB2415804A (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-04 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Disabling non-essential software services to improve system security |
US20060031685A1 (en) | 2004-08-04 | 2006-02-09 | Sherman Chen | System and method for secure code downloading |
US20060112015A1 (en) * | 2004-11-24 | 2006-05-25 | Contentguard Holdings, Inc. | Method, system, and device for handling creation of derivative works and for adapting rights to derivative works |
US20070271282A1 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2007-11-22 | Gary Boren | Translator software for monitoring, automation, testing and control |
-
2008
- 2008-08-01 EP EP08783316A patent/EP2186255A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2008-08-01 WO PCT/CA2008/001405 patent/WO2009018654A1/en active Application Filing
- 2008-08-01 US US12/184,480 patent/US8380988B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5956715A (en) | 1994-12-13 | 1999-09-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for controlling user access to a resource in a networked computing environment |
WO1997015008A1 (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-04-24 | At & T Ipm Corp. | System and method for database access control |
GB2365598A (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2002-02-20 | Hewlett Packard Co | Establishing a secure environment for a software process |
US20020019931A1 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2002-02-14 | Rainor Prinoth | Security service layer |
US20030167280A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2003-09-04 | Drexel University | Database system for laboratory management and knowledge exchange |
US20030163510A1 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2003-08-28 | Bob Janssen | Method of administering user access to application programs on a computer system |
EP1475978A1 (en) | 2003-05-07 | 2004-11-10 | M-Stack Limited | Apparatus and method of handling simultaneous UTRAN radio resource control procedures which change the security configuration in a UMTS user equipment |
US20050039178A1 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2005-02-17 | Sunil Marolia | System and method for downloading update packages into a mobile handset in a carrier network |
GB2415804A (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-04 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Disabling non-essential software services to improve system security |
US20060031685A1 (en) | 2004-08-04 | 2006-02-09 | Sherman Chen | System and method for secure code downloading |
US20060112015A1 (en) * | 2004-11-24 | 2006-05-25 | Contentguard Holdings, Inc. | Method, system, and device for handling creation of derivative works and for adapting rights to derivative works |
US20070271282A1 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2007-11-22 | Gary Boren | Translator software for monitoring, automation, testing and control |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
ISA/CA, "International Search Report", dated Nov. 4, 2008, pp. 1 to 4. |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105550598A (en) * | 2015-12-25 | 2016-05-04 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Safety management method and device of mobile storage equipment |
CN105550598B (en) * | 2015-12-25 | 2018-10-12 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | A kind of method for managing security and device of movable storage device |
US10516675B2 (en) | 2017-01-17 | 2019-12-24 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Altering application security to support just-in-time access |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2186255A1 (en) | 2010-05-19 |
US20090044250A1 (en) | 2009-02-12 |
WO2009018654A1 (en) | 2009-02-12 |
EP2186255A4 (en) | 2011-08-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8380988B2 (en) | Embedded self-contained security commands | |
US11477036B2 (en) | Devices and methods for application attestation | |
US11947688B2 (en) | Secure computing system | |
JP7545419B2 (en) | Ransomware Mitigation in Integrated and Isolated Applications | |
US10162975B2 (en) | Secure computing system | |
JP6222592B2 (en) | Mobile application identity verification for mobile application management | |
US9473485B2 (en) | Secure single sign-on for a group of wrapped applications on a computing device and runtime credential sharing | |
KR101250065B1 (en) | Method and system for enterprise network single-sign-on by a manageability engine | |
CN100568212C (en) | Isolation system and isolation method | |
US20120324545A1 (en) | Automated security privilege setting for remote system users | |
JP2017510013A (en) | Techniques for providing network security with just-in-time provisioned accounts | |
JP2009151751A (en) | Method and system for creating and updating approved-file and trusted-domain database | |
US9219728B1 (en) | Systems and methods for protecting services | |
US20130073844A1 (en) | Quarantine method and system | |
JP2020109645A (en) | System and method for changing password of account record under threat of illegal access to user data | |
US20080189542A1 (en) | Computerized Apparatus And Method For Version Control And Management | |
US7694154B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for securely executing a background process | |
Rijah et al. | Security Issues and Challenges in Windows OS Level | |
Vigo, Jr | Inside Job | |
Schwendemann | ERNW NEWSLETTER 55/SEPTEMBER 2016 | |
van Dijk et al. | Using Sensitive Information on Android 6 Based Smartphones | |
Hopkins | Operating System Security |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MEMORY EXPERTS INTERNATIONAL INC., CANADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KRAHN, DARREN;HAMID, LAURENCE;REEL/FRAME:021429/0596 Effective date: 20080709 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: IMATION CORP., MINNESOTA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MEMORY EXPERTS INTERNATIONAL INC.;REEL/FRAME:026594/0350 Effective date: 20110603 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KINGSTON DIGITAL, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IMATION CORP.;REEL/FRAME:038421/0923 Effective date: 20160202 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |