US7584134B2 - Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather events - Google Patents
Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather events Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US7584134B2 US7584134B2 US11/901,050 US90105007A US7584134B2 US 7584134 B2 US7584134 B2 US 7584134B2 US 90105007 A US90105007 A US 90105007A US 7584134 B2 US7584134 B2 US 7584134B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- hurricane
- future
- investment
- participant
- financial
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active - Reinstated
Links
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 title abstract description 326
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 30
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- JTJMJGYZQZDUJJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N phencyclidine Chemical class C1CCCCN1C1(C=2C=CC=CC=2)CCCCC1 JTJMJGYZQZDUJJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 24
- 230000002853 ongoing effect Effects 0.000 description 18
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000002459 sustained effect Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 10
- 208000001613 Gambling Diseases 0.000 description 9
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001932 seasonal effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008093 supporting effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005055 memory storage Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241000274965 Cyrestis thyodamas Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000006424 Flood reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241001489813 Ophelia Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000004308 accommodation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002730 additional effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013329 compounding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008450 motivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011176 pooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003825 pressing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012502 risk assessment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003643 water by type Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/06—Asset management; Financial planning or analysis
Definitions
- the present invention pertains to computerized investment activity such as on-line investment activity. More specifically, the present invention relates to graphical user interfaces and systems for on-line computerized investing and provides different sets of investing data to the user in readily comprehendible formats.
- Tropical cyclones include tropical weather systems referred to as “hurricanes” (or “typhoons”) if they are sufficiently strong. Tropical cyclones which grow in intensity so as to become hurricanes originate at sea and may make landfall and travel along a land portion before dissipating or returning to the sea.
- Homeowners and business insurance policies typically contain deductible provisions ranging from 2% to 15% of the value of a home or worksite. Further, these same policies do not provide any coverage for the outside areas of a home or business such as landscaping, outside lighting, docks, fencing and the like. Often, property owners do not have sufficient business interruption insurance or flood insurance or have other omissions or insufficient coverage which result in catastrophic financial losses in even the lowest rated hurricanes. Great losses suffered by property owners, such as those located along coastal and outlying areas, can be overwhelming for those who cannot afford to be self-insured.
- the invention is generally directed to systems and methods supporting the conduct of financial activities between a provider and a plurality of participants, based on a natural event such as a hurricane or tropical cyclone, or other tropical weather event.
- Tropical cyclones are low-pressure weather systems that develop at sea and at low latitudes, beginning as relatively low-energy tropical depressions. As storm energy builds, tropical depressions begin to exhibit a rotating or circular weather pattern, and if the storm intensity is sufficient it is classified as a tropical cyclone. Tropical cyclones include “tropical storms,” but the most intense tropical cyclones are referred to (depending on the ocean basin in which they occur) as “hurricanes,” “typhoons,” or simply “cyclones.” According to the National Hurricane Center, “hurricane” is a name for a tropical cyclone that occurs in that oceanic area generally referred to as the Atlantic Basin, and which is defined by certain minimum wind speeds. “Tropical cyclone” is the generic term used for low-pressure systems of great intensity that develop in the tropics and meet a criterion for relatively high maximum sustained wind speeds. The intensity of hurricanes is measured according to the Saffir-Simpson scale.
- the participants are given an opportunity to predict the future occurrence of the natural event, and to invest with the expectation of a return on their investment if their prediction should match the outcome of the natural event.
- the financial activity may be based on the landfall or land track of a hurricane. Participants engaged in the financial activity submit their prediction as to the point of landfall and/or point along the land track of a future hurricane. If their prediction matches the observed natural event, the successful, qualifying investors will enjoy payouts from the accumulated pooling of investments. Due to the complexity of issues concerning the understanding of technical data involved, and basing predictions of weather activity on such data, it is desirable to assist a user, especially a user who is not technically trained in this area, to process the data presented.
- the natural event is observed by an external objective independent information source whose observations, findings and conclusions are made available to the financial activity.
- the financial activity may take a variety of different forms including games of chance, games of skill, property value protection, derivative securities interests and secondary trading of financial assets by participants engaged in the financial activity.
- the invention in one implementation is directed to a method for presenting data relating to financial activity concerning naturally occurring tropical storm events, for investment related actions by a user. Included is a step of defining a geographical area relating to the financial transaction, a step of dividing the geographical area into regions, and a step of collecting data for the area pertaining to storm activity relating to a probability of first land strike of a storm on the area. A step of calculating a probability of a future land strike for at least one region based on the collected data is then carried out, along with a step of displaying probability data for at least one region.
- the invention is directed to a system for displaying on a graphical user interface, information relating to financial activity concerning naturally occurring tropical storm events, for investment related actions by a user.
- the system includes a component identifying a geographical area, divided into regions, relating to the financial activity, with each region having a region designation, a component for collecting data for the area pertaining to storm activity and relating to a probability of first land strike of a storm on the area and a component for calculating probabilities of a future land strike for at least one geographical region based on the collected data.
- a component for displaying probability data for at least one region is also included.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a financial activity network supported by the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a financial activity system
- FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of a first participant terminal
- FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of a second participant terminal
- FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of a point-of-purchase participant terminal
- FIG. 6 is a schematic representation of a standalone participant terminal
- FIG. 7 is a schematic representation of a first data display
- FIGS. 8 a - 8 f are schematic representations of a series of screen displays
- FIGS. 9-12 together comprise a schematic flow diagram representing one example of system operation
- FIGS. 13-18 are graphical depictions of data screens implementing a financial activity
- FIG. 19 is a schematic drawing illustrating treatment given to a unit area addressed in an exemplary financial activity
- FIG. 20 is a schematic representation of the relationship between share or option prices and dates of participation in a financial activity, prior to occurrence of a natural event;
- FIG. 21 is a table showing examples of illustrative share or option prices
- FIG. 22 is a table showing Poisson probabilities and other probabilities
- FIG. 23 is a table illustrating trade-offs involved in choosing the number of financial activities to be run.
- FIG. 24 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing an introduction to overview of the graphical user the subject invention.
- FIG. 25 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing an overview of the graphical user interface of the subject invention, reflecting current conditions;
- FIG. 26 is a schematic representation of a first computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention directed to a detailed geographical location;
- FIG. 27 is a schematic representation of a second computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention directed to a detailed geographical location;
- FIG. 28 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention directed to an overview of geographically related data for a given year;
- FIG. 29 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention offering menu choices to a user, within the context of the chosen year;
- FIG. 30 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention offering menu choices to a user, within the context of a given storm occurring in the chosen year;
- FIG. 31 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention offering different sets of data to a user, that are available within the context of a given storm, occurring in the chosen year;
- FIG. 32 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention identifying a first chosen set of data selected by a user, for a particular day and time, that is available within the context of a given storm occurring in the chosen year;
- FIG. 33 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention identifying a data event selected by a user, for a first particular geographical position for a particular day and time, that is available within the context of a given storm occurring in the chosen year;
- FIG. 34 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention identifying a data event selected by a user, for a second particular geographical position for a particular day and time, that is available within the context of a given storm occurring in the chosen year;
- FIG. 35 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention displaying another menu choice chosen by a user, within the context of a given storm occurring in the chosen year;
- FIG. 36 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention with sets of probability data available for selection by a user, for a particular day and time, that is available within the context of a given storm occurring in the chosen year;
- FIG. 37 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention with probability data selected by a user, for a particular geographic location, day and time, that is available within the context of a given storm occurring in the chosen year;
- FIG. 38 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention identifying a forecast data event selected by a user, for a particular geographical position for a particular day and time, that is available within the context of a given storm occurring in the chosen year;
- FIG. 39 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention with probability data for multiple series of a given year, along with related investment data;
- FIG. 40 is a schematic representation of a computer screen showing the graphical user interface of the subject invention displaying investment data for a particular geographical position for a particular day and time;
- FIG. 41 shows a display table of FIG. 40 .
- FIG. 42 shows a series of display tables.
- On-line performances have been proposed for a variety of financial activities. These activities may be divided in a number of different ways such as gambling and non-gambling activities, for example. Gaming or gambling systems are in place which emulates traditional gambling activities in an on-line, internet software-based program, giving the users the look and feel of traditional gambling activities. Such gambling variants have been extended to nontraditional games of chance based on virtually any experience known to mankind. Although gaming activities can receive substantial benefit from implementations of the present invention, the present invention can also be employed with games of skill and non-gaming financial transactions.
- Financial activities may also take the form of sweepstakes offerings in which participants are eligible to participate in a drawing or other selection of winners who share in or are otherwise are entitled to a pot or reserve set aside for the purpose.
- cell phone subscribers can text message their vote, indication of approval or choice of alternatives and be entered into a sweepstakes for their participation.
- the present invention is concerned with financial activity based upon games of skill in which participants process historic and other data and apply scientific principles and acquired analytical skills to arrive at informed decisions relating to the predictions of future naturally occurring activities.
- a participant makes an investment based upon one or more informed decisions, thereby contributing to a common pool from which payouts are made, for example, based upon the accuracy, level of detail and timing of their prediction.
- the present invention in one instance, is also concerned with traditional financial activities which lie outside the area of gambling. More specifically, in one example, the present invention is concerned with allocating and managing a reserve collected from participants, i.e. investors who seek to offset an unpredictable but nonetheless potentially catastrophic financial burden caused by property loss due to natural events. In one instance, these types of financial activities are based upon the participant's property interests. Although such financial investments do at times come with a substantial element of risk in the expectation and amount of return, it has long been recognized that such financial investments do not represent gambling activities.
- the present invention finds immediate application in the field of offsetting losses of those who live or find themselves in a particular geographic area subjected to natural events which cause significant damage to their property interests (e.g. homes, businesses, rentals, and vacation shares).
- natural events e.g. homes, businesses, rentals, and vacation shares.
- the present invention is concerned with offsetting losses without governmental interaction.
- natural events supported by the present invention include naturally occurring phenomena without human causality, such as tropical weather systems such as hurricanes as well as other tropical weather events.
- the premise of the financial activity is that investors can exercise personal initiative to research known naturally occurring activity and make certain predictions relating to forthcoming activity for a particular season or year.
- a return on their investment can be paid out at year's end or once a natural event has concluded, with the return being based upon certain factors such as the accuracy of their prediction, the amount of time between their investment and the occurrence of a natural event, and the skillful use of established laws of statistics and other resources available to an investor. Time and effort spent in researching natural activity can help to improve the accuracy of predictions made.
- the financial activity incorporates conclusions, findings and reports of one or more external objective information sources such as an independent disinterested third party that provides publicly available information and conclusions.
- external objective information sources such as an independent disinterested third party that provides publicly available information and conclusions.
- the terms “external” and “independent” refer to entities which are separate from the provider and/or participants of the financial activity.
- an external objective information source provides information pertaining to a natural event (in one example an indication that a defined natural event has occurred, and in another example, that the defined natural event has concluded).
- the external objective information source provides natural event data, such as a point of landfall or a land track of a storm originating at sea.
- the financial activities incorporate independent objective information which is based upon naturally occurring events that are studied by the external objective information source (and which, in one instance, is publicly available).
- financial activities contemplated by the present invention are directed to predictions of natural event activity, with financial investments being made before the activity has occurred and/or concluded. Payouts or the assigning of points or other value according to a successful, matching outcome of the financial activity may be based upon multiple factors, some of which are determinable by an external objective information source. Examples include the measurable severity which can be measured, for example, by the amount of property damage as determined by insurance institutes and government agencies. Payouts can also depend upon metrics associated with the natural event, based on details concerning occurrence of the natural event, such as its points or path of terrestrial contact and the timing of a participant's investment such as the amount of lead time given by the investor prior to event conclusion.
- an external objective independent information source is relied upon for its expertise in studying, and measuring natural event phenomena as well as drawing conclusions from data collected from natural events.
- reports made available to the public and others include inferences and conclusions drawn by an expert agency, which goes beyond a mere relating of observed facts.
- Information which is key to carrying out a financial activity (such as the time and place of occurrence of the natural activity) is obtained from a source external to the provider of the financial activity.
- the identity of the external objective information source is defined beforehand, in a rules database or in some other manner.
- the external objective independent information source provides facts and conclusions which are made generally available to the public, or at least to individuals likely to participate in the financial activity.
- individuals interested in participating in the financial activity and those participants already engaged in the financial activity can monitor progress of a natural event, independent of the financial activity.
- participants in the financial activity will be able to readily obtain expert information and skill-building technical intelligence from sources independent of the financial activity, thus enhancing motivation of the participants to engage in the financial activity with a greater likelihood of enjoying a successful outcome.
- Examples of external objective independent information sources include the National Hurricane Center and the Tropical Prediction Center for hurricanes and other tropical storms.
- Low-pressure tropical weather systems or storms beginning at sea, start as relatively low energy thunderstorms. If a moving area of thunderstorms in the tropics maintains its identity for 24 hours or more, the weather system is termed a “tropical disturbance”. If the weather system exhibits a rotating or circulating weather pattern, the weather system is referred to as a tropical cyclone. The lowest energy tropical cyclone is termed a “tropical depression” if its maximum sustained wind speed does not exceed 38 mph. For maximum sustained wind speeds ranging between 39 and 73 mph, the weather system is termed a “tropical storm”. The most intense weather systems are referred to either as “hurricanes” or “typhoons”.
- “hurricane” is a name for a tropical cyclone that occurs in that oceanic area generally referred to as the Atlantic Basin or the eastern Pacific, and which is defined by maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or more.
- “Tropical cyclone” is the generic term used for low-pressure systems exhibiting rotational characteristics that develop in the tropics and meet a criterion for relatively high maximum sustained wind speeds. The intensity of hurricanes is measured according to the Saffir-Simpson scale (categories 1 to 5).
- hurricanes and lesser storms develop from tropical depressions in the oceans where weather related factors cooperate to form and contribute energy to a low-pressure weather system.
- the weather system then travels across the ocean, along an unpredictable path.
- weather systems exhibiting circulating behavior which grow in intensity so as to develop into hurricanes which travel with a generally westward direction component and make landfall or otherwise contact property along well-defined geographical areas, such as the eastern coast of Canada, the United States, Mexico, and South America as well as sea islands lying in a path of travel toward those land bodies.
- the class of storms referred to as “hurricanes” vary in intensity and are generally free to travel along their own unique pathway or “track”.
- Hurricanes are observed by independent expert agencies of the United States government, such as the National Hurricane Center (an example of an external objective information source), which carefully records, analyzes and later publishes reports, findings and conclusions, which are made available to the public.
- hurricanes are powered by the sea's thermal energy and by energy in the atmosphere. Generally speaking, hurricanes are directed by the easterly trade winds. Around the center, core or “eye,” wind speeds accelerate to great velocities. Moving ashore, these energetic winds displace the ocean inwardly, toward land and are known to spawn tornadoes and produce torrential rains and floods. In the Atlantic Basin, for example, statistically there are 8.6 tropical storms for the years 1886-1998. Of these, 5.0, statistically, are hurricanes.
- the above illustrates aspects of natural events which may be employed in a rules database or program or other structure to govern operation of financial activity.
- hurricanes considered by the financial activity may be limited to only those hurricanes which make terrestrial contact or which have a minimum strength.
- it is important to define natural events considered by the financial activity when the members of the public may have alternative definitions which vary from those to be considered by the financial activity. For example, participants who suffered damage during the time of a tropical cyclone may not fall within the “best-track” or other report issued by an external, independent, objective information source (such as NHC/TPC) (information employed according to one of the possible rules of operation). Contrary to popular expectations, a particular participant may suffer damage from natural phenomena lying outside of the tropical event of interest to the financial activity.
- Different types of financial activities are carried out, typically between a financial activity provider and one or more participants in the financial activity.
- Different models of financial activities are contemplated, including:
- Derivative tradings type of financial activity such as those activities directed to derivative securities interests, which are typically monitored by the Securities and Exchange Commission or other oversight bodies, such as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (an independent agency of the United States government), the New York Stock Exchange, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Iowa Electronic Market, and others.
- Secondary trading of financial assets developed by a participant of one or more of the financial activities indicated above particularly secondary trading between a participant of an ongoing financial activity and a third party wishing to deal directly with the participant, rather than the financial activity provider.
- the financial activity provider may require registration of the secondary trade or impose other controls over the parties involved, including assistance with executing the trade between two or more participants or nonparticipants, such as registration of the instruments traded.
- Price-oriented competition preferably in games of skill where participants are charged an “entry fee” to engage in skillful competition with other participants.
- the distribution or “prize” to qualifying participants is predetermined at the outset of competition, and accordingly is not affected by variability factors.
- the “entry fee” can be adjusted by variability factors such as those relating to the time interval between investment and event outcome, and the probability of a successful outcome determined approximately at the time of investment.
- Voting may be carried out via text messaging, the internet or voice communication, with or without the use of voice recognition technology. Those participating are entered into a sweepstakes that may or may not include a second sweepstakes for those who vote in favor of a particular choice.
- network 10 includes a central managing system 12 linked to a plurality of participant terminals 14 - 18 .
- the terminals can comprise, for example virtually any device that provides communication with a workstation such as a network or other computers including desktop, portable, lap-top or mainframe computers, data terminals, dumb terminals, personal digital assistants, cellular phones or other electronic devices having communications capabilities.
- a workstation such as a network or other computers including desktop, portable, lap-top or mainframe computers, data terminals, dumb terminals, personal digital assistants, cellular phones or other electronic devices having communications capabilities.
- “computer” refers to a computer system comprising one or more computing devices, but could also refer to computer systems operated by stock markets, options exchanges, commodity exchanges or the like.
- each of the participant terminals communicate directly with central managing system 12 via communication network components 15 , allowing concurrent transactions and data transfers to occur.
- Other types of arrangements are possible.
- communications between the central managing system and the participant terminals can employ virtually any communications technology known today.
- the geographical spacing between the central managing system and the participant terminals can have virtually any scale desired.
- the entire network 10 can be located in a single room, or in a single building or building complex or campus.
- the central managing system 12 preferably comprises a brokerage system communicating with an exchange system.
- participants' trading is conducted through the brokerage system before being conducted with the exchange.
- the brokerage system can be omitted with participants dealing directly with the exchange system.
- the central managing system can either be incorporated into, or be provided in addition to, the exchange system.
- the financial activity network 10 can be located at various nationwide or international locations, as may be desired.
- the financial activity network may take on any form, and may employ wire, cable or wireless components (such as cell phones, text messaging devices, pda's, etc), for example.
- Network 10 can be configured as an open connection or network such as the Internet network, a wide area network, a telephone network, a satellite network, an on-line network or a closed circuit television network or the like intra-facility network.
- Network 10 can also take the form of an Ethernet arrangement, a token ring, a token bus or any other suitable communications arrangement or configuration that can link workstations, particularly workstations including one or more data processing computers.
- participant terminals can be located in one or more boundaries, e.g., political boundaries different from that of the central managing system.
- the central management system and the participant terminals are located within a given boundary, e.g., a given political boundary, the central management system may communicate with external objective, independent information sources, external credit agencies or other agencies located within one or more different political or geographic boundaries.
- operators of the financial activity may rely entirely on outside services to provide the needed credit and other financial arrangements.
- the terminals can comprise one of the many different types of electronic devices known today, including a programmable computer, a telephone, a stand-alone machine such as an ATM machine, a television or a set-top box unit, a credit card reader, a kiosk terminal, a point-of-purchase register, or a stand-alone unit resembling an arcade game, for example.
- the terminals preferably include an input device suitable for receiving a purchase request or other data from a participant, such as those employed by purchasers to obtain goods and/or services from a merchant.
- the input devices can take many forms, including a keypad (including those used in cellular and other portable devices), keyboard touch screen or mouse or a remote control device, contactless payment system, or fingerprint or other biometric system, for example.
- Systems, articles and apparatus preferably comprise digital devices, but could also comprise analog or hybrid electronic or non-electronic devices, as may be desired.
- financial activity system 100 includes system apparatus 13 embodying the central managing system 12 shown in FIG. 1 .
- system apparatus 13 comprises one or more storage devices 20 , one or more processors 22 , and one or more interface components 24 .
- the processor 22 in one example comprises a central processor unit (“CPU”).
- the processor 22 executes one or more instructions of one or more programs 30 , under control of an operating system 35 employing one or more system programs 37 .
- the program 30 in one example comprises one or more subroutines and one or more variables, as will be understood by those skilled in the art.
- the storage device 20 in one example comprises at least one instance of a recordable data storage medium, as described herein.
- the storage device 20 stores the program 30 , and one or more databases 32 , and one or more data files 34 .
- the interface component 24 in one instance comprises a graphical user interface (“GUI”).
- GUI graphical user interface
- the interface component 24 allows a service provider or other user 38 to execute one or more programs 30 .
- the program 30 in one example, comprises one or more subroutines, to carry out the financial activity methods and operations to be described herein.
- program 30 includes one or more subroutines to collect, publish, interpret or otherwise process information which supports principles and other aspects of operation of the financial activity.
- program 30 includes one or more subroutines for implementing rules of operation for the financial activity.
- the interface component 24 allows the user 38 to verify or otherwise interact with one or more results of the program 30 .
- the interface component 24 allows the user 38 to set one or more input values or operating parameters for the program 30 .
- interface component 24 includes a display device 42 and a data input device 44 which allow a user 38 to set up the central managing system according to desired operating objectives. With the interface component 24 , a user can access, read or write to the program 30 , the databases 32 and the data files 34
- Communication port 50 which provides two-way communication with the terminals 14 - 18 .
- Communication port 50 can employ virtually any communications protocol, data format and other organizational, communication or other known content that is in use today. It is generally preferred that the communications network employed between the central managing system and the participant terminals comprise an interactive device taking any suitable form.
- the financial activity system 100 in one example, comprises a plurality of components such as one or more of electronic components, hardware components, and computer software components. A number of such components can be combined or divided in the financial activity system 100 .
- An exemplary component of the financial activity system 100 employs and/or comprises a set and/or series of computer instructions written in or implemented with any of a number of programming languages, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
- the financial activity system 100 in one example comprises any (e.g., horizontal, oblique, or vertical) orientation, with the description and figures herein illustrating one exemplary orientation of the financial activity system 100 , for explanatory purposes.
- the financial activity system 100 in one example employs one or more machine (e.g. computer)-readable (hereinafter “computer-readable”) signal-bearing media.
- the computer-readable signal-bearing media store software, firmware and/or assembly language for performing one or more portions of one or more embodiments of the invention.
- Examples of a computer-readable signal-bearing medium for the financial activity system 100 comprise a storage component such as the one or more storage devices 20 .
- the computer-readable signal-bearing medium for the financial activity system 100 in one example can comprise one or more of a magnetic, electrical, optical, biological, and atomic data storage medium.
- the computer-readable signal-bearing medium can comprise floppy disks, memory devices, magnetic tapes, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, hard disk drives, and electronic memory.
- the computer-readable signal-bearing medium comprises a modulated carrier signal transmitted over a network comprising or coupled with the financial activity system 100 , for instance, one or more of a telephone network, a local area network (“LAN”), a wide area network (“WAN”), the Internet, and a wireless network.
- data needed for a financial activity may be located entirely on site, as contemplated herein.
- the present invention also contemplates situations where administrators of a financial activity may decide to divide responsibilities with an outside service.
- a credit or other financial service may be engaged to provide credit checks, authorize financially responsible individuals to participate, or even handle all financial matters, including the collection, payout and other handling of funds.
- financial activities may be conducted with authorized brokers, financial institutions as well as regulated exchanges such as stock and futures exchanges. Such activities may reflect predefined financial arrangements.
- the data handling, participant authorization and other interactions concerning the participant may reside off-site, that is, remote from the operation (and possibly the responsibility) of the financial activity.
- the databases 32 in one example comprise a participant database, an administrator or system database, a credit provider's database, a storm watch database, a rules database and a push database.
- the credit provider database contains a list of credit providers and their accepted methods of payment, as well as any credit related information of any type, such as authorization codes usually provided to merchants or the like to authorize transactions acceptable to a credit provider.
- the credit provider database may also contain other financial information associated with the credit provider, such as the credit provider's identification number and account information.
- the system administrator in one aspect provides services similar to that of a merchant selling goods and/or services to participants.
- the system administrator can comprise a reseller of goods and services such as proprietary weather reports and cartographic or weather information, as well as maps, forms and other materials relating thereto.
- operators of the financial activity may rely entirely on outside services to provide the needed credit and other financial arrangements.
- the participant database maintains a list of participants and their associated personal financial information.
- the participant database stores a set of personal payment methods which are registered by the participant with a transaction processing service, which in the preferred embodiment is engaged by the system administrator as an accommodation to the participant.
- the participant database further includes information regarding the eligibility of participants to participate in the financial activity.
- the system administrator employs a known screening service to enforce those rules set down pertaining to restrictions on participation. For example, the system administrator may choose to implement requests by government officials to curtail or otherwise limit transactions originating in or communicated to those areas subject to an evacuation order or one or more legal restrictions. Further details concerning an exemplary screening service is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 6,508,710, issued Jan. 21, 2003, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- the storm watch database tracks storm activity of interest to participants. Included, for example, are circulating storm systems which have not yet matured into hurricanes, but which have the potential for doing so. If desired, historical data concerning previous storm systems may be made available to participants, either on an unrestricted basis or at additional cost to the participant.
- the administrator database contains data and other information needed to operate the financial activity. Included, for example, are ongoing “real-time” or “moving” totals of the number of participants, the total of all reserves invested, the number of other participants that have positions (e.g. shares or options) corresponding to a participant's prediction choice, and the amount of reserves invested by the other participants. If desired, the administrator database can also include real-time estimates of payout amounts corresponding to the participant's prediction choice, assuming that the choice proves to be accurate. Such payouts may include consideration of some form of minimum return the participant may expect, for those financial activities providing such expectations. The administrator database can also include a list of known users who are to be barred from participating or otherwise restricted in their participation activity. This information can be contained in a separate database, if desired. Also, the administrator database preferably contains participation statistics and financial statistics, useful in providing an updated estimate of the cost of doing business for operating the financial activity. If desired, adjustments to cover fluctuations in overhead costs can be made with regard to future participants.
- the rules database contains rules or other principles of operation for the financial activity.
- the rules database contains a set of “rules” or principles which govern the ongoing financial activity, in a specific or in a general way (e.g. rules defining the authorities, or external objective independent information sources to be relied upon for a final, factual decision or conclusion). Examples of such authorities include expert governmental agencies responsible for monitoring natural events.
- the rules also include eligibility requirements, personal financial payment requirements, and sliding scales affecting payouts such as timing and deadlines.
- the rules may be wholly or partially public (i.e. available to participants) or private (i.e. available only to those authorized by the system administrator).
- the rules database also governs the course of conduct of specific aspects of the financial activity.
- the rules include definitions relating to the natural events to be considered by the financial activity, the external objective independent information source which manages information and determinations concerning a natural event which will be relied upon during the course of conducting the financial activity, parameters associated with the natural events, especially those parameters which are used to uniquely define each particular natural event as well as parameters for determining remuneration points or other value.
- the points or other value pertaining to the participant's remuneration can be “hidden” or incorporated within a calculation, and need not be expressed in an explicit reference.
- the rules database contains definitions of those participants eligible to engage in the financial activity, as well as those participants which qualify as finalists (“winners”) eligible or who otherwise qualify for remuneration.
- the rules database contains principles of operation governing reserves transfers between the financial activity and qualifying participants. The rules database may also govern access that a participant has to certain information concerning the financial activity, such as the number of individuals participating, the average or largest financial investments currently being made, and the raw total of reserves currently collected for the event of interest.
- the rules database can include principles of operation relating to safety and public interest considerations.
- the rules database can provide for automatic suspension of operation upon public announcement of an evacuation order or recommendations to prepare to evacuate a particular area.
- the rules database can provide for selective activity based upon the location of the participants. For example, suspension of financial activity can be limited only to those counties or other areas where government safety warnings have been issued, while allowing financial activity to continue for those areas not affected by the government warnings.
- the push database contains information useful for generating interest and encouraging participant activity.
- push data can include recent designations of officially recognized storm systems that may become candidates for future investment opportunities.
- Push data can also include brief analyses and/or statistics of ongoing or recent natural events. Different amounts of push data and different lists of push participants can be set up by a computer program according to pre-defined “trigger levels” such as storm location, intensity and speed, for example.
- the push database can also include rules of operation pertaining to push data, such as local times during which push data is or is not sent.
- the data files comprise data information which, preferably, is relatively static, such as the official designations of natural events to be issued in an upcoming activity season, official and unofficial historical reporting of natural events activity and statistics compiled from historical information, for example.
- This historical data can be combined with climatological probabilities to determine investment price and/or payouts.
- the data files can be replaced by one of the available databases, or a special database can be provided, if desired.
- a land area database can contain geographic items such as maps and other data relevant to conducting a financial activity. For example, in the United States, maps can be provided for those states at risk to a hurricane strike. Preferably, the maps would be “clickable” to allow a participant to readily indicate the state of interest. In response, more detailed maps such as maps of the counties within the state would be displayed to the participant and again, would be clickable to provide ready indication of the participant's choices of predicted strike areas. If desired, this same functionality can be provided in table form or some other form convenient for user participation.
- a cross reference “finder” tool can be provided to receive Zip code information or the like, and return with a colored or other visually distinctive area on the displayed map, or a textual response to the inquiry, ready for the participants' selection to the indicated.
- the maps, tables, or other geographic location information contain a visual indication of those areas which lie outside of the financial activity, providing a ready indication of ineligibility to participants surveying their possible choices for a prediction entry.
- the geographic location data can be linked to meteorological or climatological data for the given area.
- a weather database is preferably provided for weather, meteorological or climatological information.
- the weather database preferably contains historical information helpful to those preparing a prediction of future natural events.
- terminal apparatus 58 comprises one or more of the participant terminals 14 - 18 and includes a communications port 60 , one or more processors preferably comprising a central processing unit 62 and a memory storage unit 64 . Also included is an interface component 68 which preferably comprises a display 70 and a data input device 72 . Interface component 68 allows a participant or other user 76 to communicate with apparatus 58 and in turn with apparatus 13 of the central managing system 12 .
- terminal apparatus 80 comprising another example of the participant terminals, includes a communication port 60 , one or more processors preferably comprising a central processing unit 62 , a memory storage unit 64 and an interface component 84 .
- interface component 84 includes, in addition to a display 86 and a data input device 88 , a card read/write device 92 and an output device 94 for dispensing a printed receipt, confirming a participant's transaction.
- participant terminal 200 comprising a display 202 for presenting information about the selected natural events, a user interface integrated with the display for viewing event information and placing investments on a selected natural event, an optional card read/write device 206 for receiving an electronic or magnetic-stripe card encoded with a participant's account information, an optional ticket dispensing device 210 for providing a ticket comprising purchase information for a selected natural event and a housing 214 for retaining the display, the user interface, the card read/write device and the ticket dispensing device.
- the participant terminal 200 also includes a processor and may also include a speaker (not shown) for playing audio associated with the financial activity information.
- the display preferably comprises a CRT or a flat screen display 218 for displaying information regarding the natural events and preferably, the display comprises a touch-sensitive display, including a touch-sensitive membrane (not shown) in communication with the processor for selecting the desired investment information such as the desired investment in terms of dollars or the number of shares or options, as well as “scrolling” between next and previous information.
- any appropriate type of display may be used.
- FIG. 6 another embodiment of the at least one participant terminal, generally indicated at 230 , is shown comprising a display 232 for presenting information about the selected natural event, a user interface 236 for viewing event information and making investments, an optional card read/write device 240 for receiving an electronic or magnetic-stripe card encoded with a user's account information, an optional ticket dispensing device 242 for providing a ticket comprising investment information for a selected natural event and a stand-up type housing 250 for retaining the display, the user interface, the card read/write device and the ticket dispensing device.
- the participant terminal also includes a processor (not shown) for facilitating financial activity.
- the participant terminal 230 may also include a speaker (not shown) for playing audio associated with the financial activity information.
- the user interface may include a plurality of hardware or software buttons, each identifying different functions for facilitating various aspects of the financial activity.
- the central managing apparatus 13 and the participant terminal apparatus (together, referred to as “the apparatus”) in one example comprise a plurality of components such as one or more of electronic components, hardware components, and computer software components. A number of such components can be combined or divided in the apparatus.
- An exemplary component of the apparatus employs and/or comprises a set and/or series of computer instructions written in or implemented with any of a number of programming languages, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
- the apparatus in one example comprises any (e.g., horizontal, oblique, or vertical) orientation, with the description and figures herein illustrating one exemplary orientation of the apparatus, for explanatory purposes.
- the apparatus employs one or more computer-readable signal-bearing media.
- the computer-readable signal-bearing media store software, firmware and/or assembly language for performing one or more portions of one or more embodiments of the invention.
- Examples of a computer-readable signal-bearing medium for the apparatus comprise the storage components 20 , 64 .
- the computer-readable signal-bearing medium for the apparatus in one example comprises one or more of a magnetic, electrical, optical, biological, and atomic data storage medium.
- the computer-readable signal-bearing medium may comprise floppy disks, magnetic tapes, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, hard disk drives, and electronic memory.
- the computer-readable signal-bearing medium may comprise a modulated carrier signal transmitted over a network comprising or coupled with the apparatus, for instance, one or more of a telephone network, a local area network (“LAN”), a wide area network (“WAN”), the Internet, or a wireless network.
- a network comprising or coupled with the apparatus, for instance, one or more of a telephone network, a local area network (“LAN”), a wide area network (“WAN”), the Internet, or a wireless network.
- program 30 includes one or more subroutines for communicating with a participant located at a remote participant terminal.
- program 30 includes one or more subroutines for generating one or more screens performing a number of functions, including sending information to a participant, and receiving information from the participant.
- window or screen 300 schematically represents a summary screen for participant John Doe, as indicated at 310 .
- screen 300 is a summary screen, and works with a number of supporting screens which query the participant for specific information such as the participant's name, and receives responsive information which is then reviewed for form and content, recorded in one or more databases such as the participant database, and is reported in the area 310 .
- participant application information such as the participant's location of residence or location of other property holdings, along with information regarding the participant's credit information, or approval from an external service, such as a participating brokerage service.
- an external service such as a participating brokerage service.
- the participant's credit and other qualifications Upon approval, either internally or through an exchange clearing organization or the like service, the participant's credit and other qualifications, an account is opened for the participant and details concerning the account, credit qualifications and other related financial information are stored in one or more databases, such as the participant database.
- operators of the financial activity may rely entirely on outside services to provide the needed credit and other financial arrangements.
- the steps referred to herein regarding credit check and the like may be replaced by an authorization from the external service.
- operators of the financial activity may interact directly with an approved exchange service, with financial arrangements being made according to rules governing operation of the exchange.
- the summary screen 300 is then presented to the participant, confirming the participant's active status in the financial activity.
- one or more queries, multiple-data choices, multiple activity choices or other interactions with the participant are listed in the area 314 .
- each choice presented to the participant can have an adjoining checkbox 318 , provided for the ready data input into program 30 .
- one or more command buttons 320 - 330 can be provided for the user, to execute one or more commands or otherwise control some portion of data is stored in one or more databases, or to control some portion of program 30 allocated to the participant by the system administrator.
- area 334 can be provided to display context-sensitive rules of play to the participant, or to provide appropriate prompts or other helpful information.
- checkboxes 336 can be provided adjacent each entry in window or pane 334 to allow the participant to obtain further information related to the topic of interest.
- the participant is alerted to the current operation being performed by program 30 .
- a sequence of operations appearing in area 340 along with appropriate responsive indications from the participant may be listed in area 344 .
- information in area 344 can be saved or printed using command buttons 328 , 330 , thus affording the participant the opportunity to obtain a written record of the activities in either electronic or printed paper form.
- FIGS. 8 a - 8 f a series of exemplary data input screens are shown in schematic form. These screens pertain generally to the selection of the locations chosen by the participant for investment.
- the location may be the participant's prediction of where a hurricane strike will make terrestrial contact.
- the location may be the epicenter of the storm's strike.
- the location may be the point of landfall, or a point along the over land track of the tropical cyclone.
- Landfall can be defined in any number of ways. For example, landfall can be measured using the center of the eye of hurricane, or the eye wall of the hurricane or different portions of the structure of the hurricane.
- a screen 400 presents a map 402 of a land area, which is preferably subdivided into smaller portions, each of which may either be selectable by the participant or shaded or otherwise made visually distinctive to the participant so as to indicate an area which is not eligible for the financial activity.
- each subdivided portion of map 402 is selectable by touch screen, click and point, or by an input pen device, for example. It is also preferable, in one instance, that the area 406 selected by the participant is shaded, colored, or otherwise made visually distinctive so as to indicate graphically the choice made by the participant. In FIG. 8 a , area 406 is chosen by the participant and receives a distinctive contrasting color value to provide visual feedback to the participant. As indicated in FIG. 8 a , the screen 400 also includes a query to the participant to confirm and finalize the choice of location.
- screen 410 is presented as a prompt to the participant to expand the indicated area so as to include one or more surrounding areas.
- an enlarged area 412 surrounding the initial chosen location 406 (the “collar countries”) is made to flash or blink on and off or undergo a color change.
- An optional text message is presented to draw the participant's attention to the advantages of enlarging the selected location in which a natural event strike is predicted to occur. The participant can indicate additional locations by shift-clicking, for example.
- a pull-down window 424 is provided in screen 426 to indicate a range of values to be chosen by the participant as the predicted category strength of the hurricane strike.
- FIG. 8 e it is assumed that a participant has previously enlarged the area of strike location to be covered by the chosen investment or “stake”.
- screen 430 the participant's choice of category 2 is confirmed along with an invitation to spread the participant's stake in category strength, as well as in land area.
- a screen 440 shows the participant's selected range of category strength. Following, is a screen (not shown) which summarizes the participant's stake. For example, for the investment indicated in FIG.
- a user has selected nine geographic areas and three category strengths, for a total purchase cost of 27 shares or options (9 areas ⁇ 3 strength values). In one instance, it is generally preferred that this summary total of share or options purchased is reported in area 344 of screen 300 , shown in FIG. 7 .
- FIGS. 9-12 indicate a series of steps to be carried out during the course of the financial activity. These method steps may be implemented in a number of different ways, including, for example, but not limitation, execution of program 30 by the central managing apparatus 13 , and one or more participant terminals.
- the program 30 may be implemented by either a general-purpose computer or a special purpose electronic device, for example.
- the method steps may be incorporated into an article of manufacture such as a data storage device.
- the steps indicated in FIGS. 9-12 indicate that portion of financial activity as taken from the viewpoint of the system administrator.
- the financial activity is initiated by virtually any appropriate means.
- the start step 500 may be implemented in software that monitors the system clock and executes program code which publishes invitations to participants to engage in financial activity as of the referenced date and time.
- start step 500 may be initiated by the system administrator pressing a key switch or otherwise activating a switch to initiate transmission to participants indicating that the financial activity season has been opened.
- An event season may be related to a single natural event or a number of different natural events or a number of portions of an ongoing natural event.
- an event season is defined by calendar dates, by a number of occurrences of a defined natural event, or by a mixture of both, or may rely upon a report or other dissemination of data from an external objective independent information source.
- step 502 in addition to announcing the opening of the financial activity season, an optional offer is made to make available certain rules of operation which govern financial activity for the season of operation.
- application information is obtained from the participants. This information can include, for example, an indication of the identity of the participant, the participant's residential location or location of property interests, and the participant's credit information needed to allow the system administrator to authorize opening of an account for the participant. Alternatively, the administrator may rely upon external credit or other financial services to take the necessary action culminating in authorization of a participant's account.
- the system administrator predefines acceptance criteria in the rules which govern the financial activity. These rules may include intervention by an external agency, such as an external credit agency from which credit is purchased by the participant, using the system administrator as a broker, as is currently done by many merchants offering goods or services for sale.
- step 506 the application information is reviewed and the decision made in step 508 is to either accept or reject the participant's application.
- a participant's application may be rejected because the participant has failed to disclose a property interest needed to base financial activity on property losses caused by occurrence of natural events. If the participant's application is rejected, control is passed to step 511 which sends a termination message to the participant and returns control to step 504 .
- step 510 If the participant's application is accepted, control is passed to step 510 in which credit information is obtained from the participant. The participant's credit qualifications are reviewed in step 512 and a decision is rendered in step 514 to accept or reject the participant based upon the added requirements of appropriate credit qualifications. Again, if the participant fails to meet sufficient credit qualifications, control is passed to step 511 which sends a termination message to the participant and then transfers control to step 504 . If the decision in step 514 is positive, indicating acceptance of the participant's application and credit qualifications, control is passed to step 516 which confirms the active status of the participants with respect to the financial activity. Such confirmation may be indicated, for example, by a report rendered by screen 300 as explained above, with reference to FIG. 7 .
- step 518 the prediction entry is requested from the participant.
- the participant provides information defining the investment to be made.
- the participant declares the primary parameter information which, in one instance, comprises the location of the land strike predicted for the natural event. Thereafter, the participant declares any secondary parameters required by the rules of operation, such as the severity of the strike, and the strike duration, for example.
- the prediction entry and other investment information is obtained from the participant and stored in one or more databases, for future reference. In one instance, the time at which the investment information is obtained is noted and stored along with the participant's investment data.
- the amounts of payout or remuneration to a successful participant is weighted according to the amount of time between the investment transaction and occurrence of the event, with greater time durations being weighted more favorably, on the premise that later investments have the benefit of accumulated knowledge which will benefit the ability to predict occurrence of an event.
- step 522 The investment information is reviewed in step 522 and judgment is made in step 524 as to whether the investment information is acceptable or not. If the investment information is rejected in step 524 , control is passed to step 526 which sends an error message to the participant, passing control to step 518 to repeat the information gathering process. If desired, step 526 can cause relevant information to be offered or displayed to the participant to help raise the participant's level of skill in making a prediction. If desired, the participant can be asked to answer a number of questions relating to the skills involved in making a prediction for the particular natural event.
- step 528 the investment information is recorded along with the current time.
- this information, and resulting decisions to authorize a participant may be as simple as receiving a favorable indication from an external credit entity or the like service.
- the system administrator has the option of determining at what point in the ongoing financial activity a participant is deemed to have completed the investment process for the purpose of determining the time difference between the investment and occurrence of the natural event. For example, the times noted in either steps 520 or 528 (or some other time if desired) can be used.
- a system administrator may wish to defer appointing an investment time to the participant until monies for the transaction have been obtained from the participant. As a concession to the participant, the system administrator may provisionally appoint an investment time at an earlier step.
- step 530 control is passed to step 530 in which necessary monies are collected from the participant. If desired, the participant's ability to pay can be guaranteed before hand to eliminate any time delay at this point in the ongoing financial activity. Further, as mentioned above, these and other financial arrangements may be handled by an external agent or service, or may be otherwise provided for according to various regulatory bodies.
- step 532 the participant's investment is confirmed by an entry to the summary screen 300 , for example.
- control is then passed to step 534 in which contact is made with an external objective independent information source that observes the natural event and manages information concerning the natural event and optionally, renders related decisions, such as assigning a severity level according to established scales of measure.
- a system administrator provides in the rules of operation that a financial activity will rely upon a designated external objective independent information source for information concerning the occurrence and characteristics and other parameters of natural events upon which investments are to be based.
- connection to an external objective independent information source may be initiated or alternatively, data from the external objective independent information source previously obtained may be accessed for use by the financial activity.
- updates to ongoing developments received from the external objective independent information source may be posted for the benefit of existing and prospective participants. In one instance, updates are made on an ongoing “live” basis, either with little or no time delay, or at a minimum, at a time prior to closing of a natural event.
- step 538 information from the external objective independent information source is queried to determine if the external objective independent information source has established start of a natural event of interest to the financial activity. If an event has not yet started, control is passed to step 536 .
- the external objective independent information source determines that an event has started, a unique identifier for the natural event is assigned and recorded to one more databases. In one instance, the unique identifier is thereafter associated with each investment by a participant concerning the natural event.
- step 540 the start of the event is reported to the participants and the time of event starting as “officially” determined under rules of the system administrator is posted or otherwise made available to participants, and is recorded in one or more databases for possible future reference by the financial activity.
- step 544 if the event has not yet closed, continuous updates regarding event progress are obtained and in one instance, are reported or otherwise made available to the participants.
- step 546 determines if financial activity has ceased.
- the system administrator provides the rules of operation defining the starting and ending times for a financial activity season. This can be based upon an arbitrary date and time, or upon occurrence of a particular event, such as occurrence of the fourth, fifth, or sixth tropical cyclone since the season opened. In one instance, closing of one season may be followed by an immediate or delayed opening of a subsequent season. For example, a subsequent season can be declared by the system administrator to accommodate financial investments based upon occurrence of the fourth, fifth or sixth tropical cyclone occurring in a given hurricane season, as defined by the National Hurricane Center. Referring to FIGS.
- step 546 if it is determined in step 546 that a season has ended, the season of financial activity is closed in step 548 and accumulated data and other information is reviewed in step 550 to determine and identify the finalists which have made successful predictions concerning the natural event, as provided in the rules of operation for the financial activity.
- step 552 a number of calculations are made in preparation for making payouts to the successful finalists. In one instance, calculations are made to determine the total holdings, the remuneration points per finalist, the administration and operating fees associated with conducting the financial activity, and the amounts of remuneration for each finalist. Remuneration points, in one instance, are based solely upon the primary parameter, which is preferably the strike location of the natural event. In another instance, remuneration points are determined not only by the strike location but by other natural event parameters, secondary or otherwise.
- null an additional outcome, called a “null” event may be defined for a financial activity.
- the null event is an investment choice made to participants, giving them the opportunity to invest in the possible outcome where there is no U.S. hurricane landfall in the current operating period, such as a series, season or year. Participants investing in the null outcome, for example, may receive a return at the end of hurricane season or other operating period.
- a single primary parameter is defined by the system administrator in the system rules of operation.
- one or more secondary parameters are also defined in the system rules of operation.
- secondary parameters are assigned a lesser weighting than the primary parameter.
- the primary and secondary parameters if any, can have equal or unequal weighting, as may be desired.
- location of the hurricane's strike is defined as a primary parameter, with time delay between the investment time and the time of the hurricane strike at the investment location being defined as a secondary parameter.
- the time delay secondary parameter is weighted less than the primary parameter.
- severity of the natural event at the predicted location declared by a participant is defined as a tertiary parameter, and the secondary and tertiary parameters are assigned unequal weighting.
- Remuneration points may be determined according to a mathematical formula, algorithm, market prices or other operation which does not require human intervention at the time of execution. Thus, the formula, algorithm or other operation may be incorporated in an analog or digital electronic circuit or a hydraulic circuit, for example. If desired, and especially with financial activity providing a hedge against property losses, remuneration points may be determined, contingent upon or otherwise based upon confirmation of the participant's property interests.
- step 554 payouts are made to the successful participants, or finalists.
- step 556 the financial activity is closed.
- a participant may elect to contact a system administrator or other service provider to engage in a financial activity. Investments are paid into a system account to purchase shares or options in the financial activity. Assuming a participant's activities are successful and perhaps if certain qualifications are met, payouts are made from the system account to the participant.
- Other types of transactions include, for example, shares or options purchased in the course of the financial activity can either be uniquely assigned to a participating individual, or they can be made freely transferable. Accordingly, a financial activity may be organized such that either payouts must be made to the participant making the investment or payouts can be made to any individual possessing sufficient identification, such as an account number and password.
- the investment positions referred to herein as shares or options, futures or stakes or other financial investment unit, whether in the nature of a derivative holding or not, can be bought and sold between various parties, either with or without interaction with personnel associated with the financial activity.
- the aftermarket activity in shares or options transfer can be offered by the operator of the financial activity as a service to members of the public.
- the financial activity, from investment to pay out would be carried out by operators of the financial activity.
- financial activities can also be carried out between two or more participants, with the operator of the financial activity providing a service that facilitates financial interactions between the parties involved.
- the administrators of the financial activity may elect to engage a brokerage institution, exchange, or clearing organization, for example, to handle financial and related functions.
- a price or cost variation in the purchase of a financial investment unit (otherwise termed a “share or option” or a “stake”) representing a quantification of a participant's financial investment is provided.
- a first component of price variability keeps track of the timing of the investment. It should be borne in mind that investments can be made a long time (e.g. months) before a natural event, such as the time a hurricane would be likely to occur.
- This variability factor namely that of timing
- This variability factor is to encourage investments to be made earlier, rather than later.
- This variability factor in effect, preferably operates as a price discount factor, although the variability factor could also be applied to payout distributions.
- One or more probability assessments are preferably made at the time of a participant making an investment in the financial activity.
- One probability assessment preferably takes the form of a probability calculation based on current conditions, of the likelihood of a “hit,” “successful outcome” or “qualification” that a participant's prediction will occur. For situations involving hurricane natural events, the price of a unit available for purchase by a participant at a given time is calculated based upon a probability that the county (or other geographical designation for a purchase unit) chosen by the participant will suffer a hurricane strike. If desired, probabilities can be based upon storms other than hurricanes and if desired the strength of the storm or other factor can be employed to alter the purchase price at any given time.
- conditional probabilities For example, the average number of hurricane landfalls on the U.S. in a given year is 1.7. This value is sufficient to define a Poisson distribution, according to conventional techniques, for numbers of U.S. landfalls, which yields a probability of 0.817 that at least one US landfalling hurricane will occur in a given year. Similarly, from this Poisson distribution, the conditional probability that there will be at least two US landfalling hurricanes, given that one has already occurred, is 0.620.
- shares or options in later reserves can be priced more cheaply than earlier reserves according to conditional probabilities of K strikes, given that K-1 strikes have already occurred, so that, in addition, prices go up in subsequent reserves when an earlier reserve closes.
- the financial activity incorporates multiple stages of probability assessment, with different probability treatments being given at each stage. Preferably, three probability treatments are applied to investment price, but could also be applied to payout distributions if desired.
- a first stage of probability assessment no storms or other precursors to hurricanes are in existence, and the first stage probabilities preferably are based on climatological relative frequencies.
- Second stage probabilities are in play where at least one storm exists in the field of interest (e.g. the Atlantic basin) but is far enough away from the area of interest (preferably, the coastline of the continental United States and adjacent coastlines) that no forecasts of imminent landfall can be made.
- the area of interest preferably, the coastline of the continental United States and adjacent coastlines
- attention is paid at this stage to tropical depressions, and tropical cyclones such as hurricanes and to their location and tracks at sea.
- attention is paid to the historical tracks or paths of storms in previous years that subsequently made landfall in the area of interest.
- occurrence of a natural event such as the landfall of a hurricane is imminent. It is generally preferred that the existence of the third stage is declared, based upon an indication of an independent objective information source, such as the National Hurricane Center/Tropical Prediction Center.
- an independent objective information source such as the National Hurricane Center/Tropical Prediction Center.
- a provider of a financial activity may look to the issuance of hurricane watches, and especially hurricane warnings from the National Hurricane Center.
- a hurricane watch is issued when it is determined that hurricane conditions may threaten an area within 24 to 36 hours. At this point, preparations may be made for an imminent evacuation, if one is ordered.
- a hurricane warning is issued when hurricane conditions (i.e. maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or more) are expected in a specified coastal area within 24 hours or less.
- stage three probability assessments are intentionally weakened by the calendar or the timing variability factor. Since the natural event is imminent, price discounts for unit purchases is preferably very low or nil. If desired, payout penalties can be assessed for stage three investments because of their close timing to occurrence of the natural event.
- hurricane natural events can be structured around hurricane landfall or hurricane land tracks, either individually, one exclusive of the other, or in combination.
- An arbitrary width can be assigned to the point of landfall if desired, by the provider of the financial activity.
- the passage of a hurricane over inland geographical areas can raise a number of different possibilities made available to the provider of a financial activity.
- the National Hurricane Center is designated as the external objective independent information source
- one report currently available to providers of financial activities is the so-called “best track” report which issues after a hurricane event is concluded.
- the “best track” report defines the inland path of a hurricane according to a table of discrete position values. Thus, it is left to the provider of the financial activity to determine the best way to define the hurricane path between published points on the “best track” table.
- the points of the “best track” table can be connected by straight lines or by curved lines according to a predefined curve-fitting method, for example.
- an arbitrary width can be assigned to the hurricane path.
- the “best track” report is not the only possible source of scoring information, and may not be desirable in certain instances because of the time delay associated with issuance of the report after conclusion of the natural activity.
- the same kind of information (lat/lon and maximum sustained winds) are available in near-real time in what are called “advisories” issued by the National Hurricane Center, which do not suffer from prolonged time delays.
- the most rapid satisfactory resolution of the outcome of the natural event is preferred, so that distributions can be made promptly to individuals who suffer from the natural event.
- payout for a geographical land unit can be based upon one or more external factors, such as a simple hit/no-hit treatment for the land unit of interest.
- payout for a land unit of interest can be based upon the published strength of the hurricane according to the “best track” or other table.
- the strength of a hurricane can vary in intensity or strength when passing over a given geographical land unit of interest. The possibility is thus presented for a mathematical treatment taking into account the difference of strengths at entry and exit points of the hurricane with respect to the geographical unit of interest.
- the geographical unit of interest can lie between points published on the “best track” table, and some manner of interpolation of values can be made with respect to the geographical unit of interest.
- payouts can be calculated based upon the strength of the hurricane for the qualifying geographical unit. For example, one payout possibility is to award greater payout for geographical units suffering greater strengths of hurricane activity, under the premise that more help will be provided for those participants that suffer greater damage, as measured by hurricane strength.
- Variability factors other than those presented above can also be considered when calculating payouts to qualifying participants.
- timing factors and probability factors discussed above which are preferably employed for price variability
- strength variability an account can be made of the residence time of a hurricane in a given geographical unit of interest, under the premise again that more help will be provided for those participants that suffer greater damage as measured by the time that a hurricane is present in a given geographical unit of interest.
- one or more systems, one or more methods, and/or one or more devices for carrying out the financial activity are provided.
- a number of important issues are addressed by the databases and/or program. In one instance, it is a generally preferred that these issues be addressed as much as possible, on a modular basis. In this manner, a system administrator is able to quickly and easily tailor the financial activity to meet a number of particular needs, and can modify the financial activity on an ongoing basis, if necessary.
- a brief description of some of the “modular” issues will now be given.
- an external objective independent agency which monitors a natural event, measures, observes, or otherwise obtains and records data concerning a natural event, as well as drawing conclusions and making analytical determinations concerning a natural event.
- the external objective independent agency be independent of the participant's financial activity, and in another instance be readily observable by the public, or at least the participants.
- the external objective independent agency can comprise a unit of the United States government which routinely makes public announcements and which is subject to Freedom of Information inquiries from members of the public.
- an event eligible for payout For example, relating to hurricane natural events, it is generally preferred in one instance that the event be “officially” declared a “hurricane” as defined by the National Hurricane Center. However, in other instances, other recognized pre-hurricane stages can be treated by the financial activity, with or without weighting the points upon which payout is based. In one instance, payout for the financial activity can be based upon an occurrence of a natural event or a termination of a natural event.
- participant eligibility needed to be permitted to engage in the financial activity. Included, for example, is the level of skill of the participant (needed, to qualify to participate in a financial activity structured as a game of skill), or the property rights of participant (needed, for example, to qualify to participate in a financial activity structured as a vehicle for recouping losses to property rights caused by a natural event).
- the financial activity season can, for example, coincide with a particular time interval such as a “hurricane season” as defined by the National Hurricane Center.
- the financial activity season can be chosen to lie outside of a recognized or customary time period such as the National Hurricane Center “hurricane season” and that this is preferred for hurricane natural events.
- Number and length of financial activity seasons in a given year there can be but one financial activity season.
- the financial activity season can begin at the beginning of a calendar year.
- the financial activity season can begin at any time during a calendar year.
- the length of a financial activity season can be a predefined number of natural events.
- a financial activity season can be defined to comprise a predetermined number of natural events, which is either concluded or is followed by a subsequent financial activity season upon the occurrence of those predetermined number of natural events.
- recognized activities can include coastal strikes, inland strikes and near-shore hurricanes which do not make landfall (such as hurricanes which come within one quarter mile of eligible coastal shore).
- Other definitions of “sub-characteristics” can be made for other types of natural events, other than hurricanes.
- Defining areas or regions eligible for inclusion in the financial activity In one instance, only terrestrial areas or regions may be declared eligible for inclusion in the financial activity. In another instance, the terrestrial areas or regions eligible for inclusion in the financial activity are geographically defined according to convenient delineations, such as established political boundaries. In a further instance, portions of geographic regions can be declared ineligible for inclusion (for example, some of the many island areas of the Eastern Seaboard of the United States can be declared ineligible for inclusion, because of small size, few or no inhabitants, or for other reasons which are or are not stated).
- the stricken areas can be defined according to external objective independent agencies such as the National Hurricane Center.
- stricken areas eligible for the financial activity include those areas as defined by the National Hurricane Center “best-track” or other, interim reports which are typically published either during or shortly after the conclusion of a hurricane event.
- the size or width of the National Hurricane Center “best track” (preferably, of the center of the eye of the hurricane) can be infinitely thin, or it can be of a predetermined width.
- stricken areas eligible for the financial activity can be calculated by connecting points given in the National Hurricane Center table data of a hurricane's “best-track” or other table with either a straight line, or a curved line preferably defined by a predetermined curve-fitting method.
- distributions based upon a hurricane's “best track” can pay out different amounts for different qualifying participants, depending upon the severity of the hurricane at the time and/or point of contact with the hurricane, or other primary, secondary, tertiary or other criteria.
- observed information from an independent external source regarding the land track of a tropical weather event may not be continuously reported.
- the use of a “best track” or other table inherently assumes discrete points of data spread out over a time interval. Questions can arise when the reported data does not correspond to boundaries of geographical areas defined by the financial activity.
- Various treatments can be given. For example, an average value can be established between two adjacent data points (e.g.
- determining the amount of payout for those participants eligible to receive payouts Determining the amount of payout for those participants eligible to receive payouts.
- payouts varied according to a number of different factors and considerations are given herein. These variations can be accounted for in a number of different ways including, for example, a simple linear weighting or a more complex algorithm, formula, index or table.
- variations in payout between different participants can be based upon one or more related or independent factors, as may be desired.
- determining the amount of payout for qualifying participants can be based upon primary, secondary and if desired, tertiary and other criteria. For example, for tropical weather events, primary criteria can be chosen to be the “locus” of landfall of a tropical weather event.
- the land track of a tropical weather event can be treated as another primary criterion (especially where an equal weighting among primary criteria is assumed) or can be treated as a secondary criterion (especially where unequal, preferably a lesser, weighting is assigned, relative to the primary criteria).
- other secondary or lower level criteria can be chosen, such as residence time in a given geographical area, or wind speed or range of wind speed associated with a tropical weather event, preferably while the tropical weather event is resident in the geographical area predicted by the participant.
- multiple criteria can be established in tertiary or other additional levels (preferably assuming unequal weighting among the levels of the criteria).
- financial activities may, in one instance, be modeled to resemble financial trading of derivative securities interests (e.g. options), such as those monitored by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (an independent agency of the United States government), the New York Stock Exchange, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Iowa Electronic Market, and others.
- derivative securities interests e.g. options
- the Commodity Futures Trading Commission an independent agency of the United States government
- the New York Stock Exchange the Chicago Mercantile Exchange
- Iowa Electronic Market and others.
- this financial activity model and assuming a hurricane or tropical weather type of natural event, initially all geographical areas (e.g. counties) in play are available for individual investments at the beginning of the declared financial activity season at some predefined minimum investment amount (i.e. purchase price). Once an investment is made for a particular geographical area, the next investment to be made for that same geographical area is set at a higher purchase price.
- the rules of the financial activity can provide that the second investment will undergo a flat rate pricing increase, such as $0.25 per share or option.
- pricing increases can be assigned in steps according to step increases in the volume (either dollar amount or number of shares or options traded) of trading. If desired, other types of increases can be employed, including linear and nonlinear mathematical treatments of purchase price.
- the prices for subsequent investments in a particular geographical area may either continue to increase or will plateau at a constant price until a set point minimum number of shares or options is reached.
- the set point is chosen to reflect a substantial “pot size”, which would justify a substantial step in price increase.
- several steps of price increases can be employed and related to similar or different sized blocks of shares or options. If, for example, a particular geographical area suffers a lull in trading, the purchase price can be reduced, based on the time value since the last trading activity. Once activity resumes for a particular geographical area, price increases can go into effect.
- Each geographical area will have different initial prices and could have different step sizes or blocks, as shares or options are traded, if desired.
- share or option price varies according to market activity (e.g. a stepwise or a smoothly varying increase as trading activity increases).
- share or option price can also vary according to time factors, such as factors centered around a falloff (or optionally a rise) in trading activity.
- pricing follows a number of principles. For example, it is generally preferred that trading begins with a set minimum price which could be different for each geographical area. In one instance, it is generally preferred that the minimum price depends on market activity. In a second instance, it depends on the climatological probability, (as currently estimated), of the particular geographical area being hit, and, as trading progresses, how many shares or options have been sold for a particular geographical area, and also the total amount of money in the pot. If desired, each of these principles can be applied in different amounts, (e.g. according to different increments, different rates or other mathematical treatment). It is generally preferred that the minimum price increases as the probability for a hit in the geographical area increases, and the minimum price should also go up as the total dollars in the pot goes up. In one instance, it is generally preferred that the minimum price goes down as the number of shares or options potentially splitting the pot (i.e. for a particular geographic area) goes up.
- the “derivative trading” type of financial activity can be operated according to a different structure.
- the financial activity in a maturing market can be alternated (less preferably, replaced) with an “auction” form of financial activity.
- the auction form of financial activity, once initiated, is scheduled to occur at different intervals. For example, multiple auctions would preferably occur periodically throughout the season, in one instance, with the time spacing between auctions being sparser (e.g. weekly or monthly) early in the process, and more frequent (e.g. multiple auctions per day) when tropical cyclones are in existence and especially when hurricanes are threatening imminently.
- the reserve price for an auction is preferably made proportional to the probability that a particular geographic area will be hit, multiplied by the funds available, and that product divided by the number of shares or options outstanding for that particular geographical area. If desired, the proportionality constant applied could be unity or some number smaller or greater than one.
- derivatives trading is based on “market-based” pricing.
- market-based pricing refers to pricing that is based on recent or cumulative state of play. If desired, the market-based pricing may or may not be driven by algorithms, or only partially driven by algorithms, as may be desired.
- stage 2 probability for that area is calculated as set forth herein to be 0.10.
- each geographical area in play there would preferably be separate auctions for each geographical area in play (with one or more auctions for each geographical area), with the degree of investor interest determining whether and/or how much the price would rise above the levels indicated. Also, it is generally preferred that the number of units on offer at any one time would be limited to a fixed number, it being expected that, if the total offer is unlimited, there would be no incentive to bid higher than the reserve price.
- the present invention also contemplates financial activity concerning property owners' exposure to damage related to hurricanes and other naturally occurring events. It has long been recognized that a hurricane's potential to inflict damage to property can be estimated from vectored wind speeds, such as translational and rotational wind speeds, and other observed characteristics such as the hurricane's radius or other size-indicating data.
- a scale of measurement is derived from a series of observed facts concerning hurricane characteristics. Values on the scale provide an indication or measurement of the risk of property damage as a result of the exposure to an historical or forecasted hurricane (or other like natural event). In one instance, the values are calculated or computed numbers and the scale of values may be in the form of an index, table or other data construct.
- the indication or measurement of the risk of property damage can, for example, relate solely to the likelihood of landfall, or could relate to the prospect of landfall with our without consideration of storm intensity and with our without consideration of property values exposed to the storm.
- futures are traded multilaterally (many trading with many) or bilaterally via an exchange (dealer and buyer or seller).
- the various contracts are settled against a scale, expressed, for example, as an index, a table, or other data construct, that is calculated with reference to hurricane-related observed facts, such as those mentioned above, and elsewhere, herein.
- the scale could relate, for example, to the likelihood of first landfall, or the potential of the naturally occurring event to cause damage to property exposed to the naturally occurring event.
- Contracts for the futures and options on futures are preferably created for defined geographical regions exposed to hurricane and other naturally occurring events.
- the scale(s) employed could relate to the hurricane's first landfall, a range of geographical regions over which all hurricanes for a season make landfall, or geographic regions suffering exposure to a minimum storm force.
- First landfall could be on a geographic region-by-geographic region basis, or on the basis of all defined geographic regions taken together, or in multiple-region subdivisions or other defined manner.
- contracts for financial products such as futures contracts, options contracts and options on futures contracts, are cleared through a futures exchange.
- the contracts may be created for defined geographical regions exposed to hurricanes and other naturally occurring activity, and are preferably settled against one or more embodiments of a scale of measurement of the type described above, or herein, derived from a series of observed facts concerning characteristics of natural events, especially characteristics related to a potential of a naturally occurring event to inflict property damage. Values on the scale may be expressed in the form of an index, a table, or other data construct as may be desired.
- the contracts may set a lower limit on the amount of damage contemplated.
- the contracts may be limited to future potential damage exposure, or may be implemented for actual sustained damage, preferably damage estimates provided by a responsible external third party, such as a government entity or insurance or reinsurance service. If desired, the scale may be based in whole or in part on information provided by such government entity or insurance or reinsurance service.
- contracts considered herein could be defined in terms of actual or estimated future damage, with or without a set minimum amount of damage, or the likelihood that a defined amount of damage is reported for a particular storm, a range of dates or an entire season. If desired, the contracts could be defined on a storm-by-storm basis, or could be limited to the storm having the greatest impact in the chosen category (damage caused, size of storm, strength of the storm, measured in some predetermined manner, size of coastal area or land area affected). If desired, contracts could also include offshore properties such docks, or harbors, or ships that are moored, tethered or otherwise present within a defined proximity to land.
- multiple scales can be provided for each geographic region, or different time divisions, such as different date ranges, and could be provided for different series, in which each first landfall of a season terminates the current series, with a new, subsequent series being started.
- contracts could also be offered for a “null” event in which no landfall is reported for a given season or other defined time period.
- one financial activity according to principles of the present invention contemplates trading of contracts utilizing a futures index.
- the contracts are written for a first landfall criteria. This example assumes interest in a particular geographical region, referred to herein as Sarasota County. It is assumed in this example, that, although the storm is still some days away from landfall, that it is becoming more likely that the storm may be heading for Sarasota County.
- An index is provided as a basis for trading geographical regions, and futures contracts are offered for trade.
- the Sarasota County Index rises as it becomes more likely Sarasota will be First Landfall, and falls as it becomes less likely.
- the futures contract on that Index are based on the proposition that, when the first storm makes landfall, all futures contracts expire and buyers or sellers must pay off based on what the last index price was before Landfall.
- the example focuses on two participants, a first participant that thinks Sarasota will be hit first, and a second participant that doesn't.
- the first participant buys a Sarasota Index futures contract at $100 on Monday, and accordingly is long on Sarasota County
- the second participant sells a Sarasota Index futures contract at $100 on Monday, and accordingly is short on Sarasota County.
- Both participants pay margins as required by exchange rules and by contracts with the participant's “clearing firms.” For discussion purposes, each participant pays $5 in margin to their clearing firm.
- the Sarasota Index plummets.
- the price of the Sarasota future is assumed to drop to $10.
- the following is one example of financial activity contemplated by the present invention.
- different types of financial activity models may be employed.
- the following example is given in terms of a financial activity model of the type comprising a game of skill, although many of the principles set forth herein are applicable to other financial activity models, as well.
- the financial activity contemplated herein is generally referred to as “Hurricane Reserves”, emphasizing the investment nature of the financial activity as a hedge against unforeseen loss.
- the Hurricane Reserves are games of skill that focus on a particular type of natural event, namely hurricanes making landfall in the United States. That is, in this example, only tropical cyclones having a strength meeting the minimum criteria to be termed “hurricanes” are considered.
- a tropical cyclone originates at sea, and grows in intensity over time, before making landfall. It is possible that the intensity of the tropical cyclone may rise and fall.
- the criteria chosen here is that the tropical cyclone has a minimum category one hurricane intensity at the time of landfall.
- the Hurricane Reserves are structured to allow “participants” or “investors” to use them in a way that can augment hurricane insurance, while simultaneously providing income to participating states to help defray costs associated with disaster management.
- Homeowners and business insurance policies typically contain deductible provisions ranging from 2% to 15% of a home's value. In addition, these same policies do not provide any coverage for the outside areas of a home or business, such as landscaping, outside lighting, docks, fencing and the like. Often, property owners do not have sufficient flood insurance and have other omissions or insufficient coverage which result in catastrophic financial losses in even the lowest rated hurricanes. Also, losses are suffered when rates are lost and also, where temporary housing is needed.
- the Hurricane Reserves for example can be distinguished from insurance instruments, with payouts for qualifying investments not being tied to actual property losses, and thus being dispensed more quickly. Payouts here do not involve inspection by adjusters, and therefore can be made much more promptly—(e.g. within a few weeks). This promptness and flexibility can be achieved because the Hurricane Reserves operate in a way that emphasis is placed on payouts that primarily depend upon apportioning Hurricane Reserves that have been invested into a particular Hurricane Reserve, and on the amounts and timing of Hurricane Reserve entries for counties that experience a hurricane strike.
- financial activities may be constructed around models that cover the natural event activity either on an event by event basis, or on a “seasonal” basis for events occurring during a predefined span of time.
- the number of Hurricane Reserves in which investors may participate can vary from year to year, depending on the number of officially declared eligible events.
- the Hurricane Reserves may be regarded as different series occurring in a season. Initially, two or three Hurricane Reserves may be opened to investment, beginning on 1 January. Each of these initial Hurricane Reserves relate to one of the first two or three tropical cyclones passing over a portion of the U.S.
- Each investment in a Hurricane Reserve is preferably made in the form of shares or options or the like, purchased for one or more of the geographical regions, such as counties (or county equivalents, for example Louisiana parishes) that are plausible hurricane targets.
- these shares or options have been purchased for counties that later receive a hurricane strike, they qualify their owners to receive payouts from that Hurricane Reserve.
- All of the investments in a given Hurricane Reserve less items which may be defined in a given instance (e.g. portions designated for participating state governments and fees for Hurricane Reserve management), are paid to investors in the qualifying county or counties.
- the formula determining these payouts accounts both for the chances of a hurricane striking the qualifying county(s), as assessed at the time a Hurricane Reserve investment is made, and a reward for earlier investments into that Hurricane Reserve.
- Entries in the Hurricane Reserves are made for individual counties, in the form of “shares or options” in one of the specific Hurricane Reserves available for investment.
- the first Hurricane Reserve relates to the first tropical cyclone to make landfall as a hurricane over the U.S., including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; the second Hurricane Reserve relates to the second hurricane striking the same area; and so on.
- Shares or options purchased in Hurricane Reserve #1 for Galveston would qualify their owners for a portion in all of the money invested in that Hurricane Reserve, but investors in Hurricane Reserve #1 for Miami-Dade would receive nothing from that Hurricane Reserve.
- investors in Hurricane Reserve #2 for Miami-Dade would be entitled to a portion of all of the money invested in that Hurricane Reserve, whereas Galveston investors in Hurricane Reserve #2 would receive nothing from that Hurricane Reserve.
- FIGS. 13-18 shows a web site implementing a Hurricane Reserve financial activity.
- FIG. 13 shows a web site screen which serves either as a welcome page or one of the first pages that a participant will encounter upon acquiring the web site. Included in the screen depicted in FIG. 13 is an indication 600 of the current open Hurricane Reserves and a brief summary 602 of current tropical cyclone activity.
- individuals who do not have internet access will also be able to participate in the Hurricane Reserves by using touch screen displays and other examples of graphical user interfaces, located at convenience stores, gas stations and the like. Individuals will make selections by touching an interactive screen, for example, and pay for their investment by swiping a credit card or providing a cash payment to the retail establishment.
- the display will automatically generate a printed receipt (including identification number) for both credit card and cash purchases.
- a social security number and perhaps a biometric device such as a fingerprint scan may be required to participate in the Hurricane Reserve.
- FIGS. 16-18 show share or option purchases for the Storm Reserve web site implementation of a Hurricane Reserve.
- FIGS. 16 a and 16 b - 16 c two screens are shown for purchasing shares or options and in FIG. 17 a confirmation is given for shares or options purchased.
- FIG. 18 a summary or “portfolio” of all transactions for a participant is shown.
- the investment preferably cannot be reversed as these would affect the value of the shares or options purchased by others. In one instance, an investment is not considered to have been accepted until the investor's credit card company credits that investment in the Hurricane Reserve. If the credit card company later reverses that payment to the Hurricane Reserve, the value of the shares or options purchased in the Hurricane Reserve will be preferably set to zero.
- the price of a Hurricane Reserve share or option for a particular county is, in one instance, determined by a mathematical formula involving both the probability of that county being hit, and price discounts for early investments. Therefore, share or option prices in Hurricane Reserves will be different at different times and different for different counties at a particular time.
- the price incentives for early investment may be substantial, and are designed to encourage investments before any tropical events are in existence, and indeed well before the beginning of hurricane season. It is anticipated that much of the early investment activity will come from investors who may want to use the Hurricane Reserves to supplement conventional insurance, or from insurers using the Hurricane Reserves as a reinsurance vehicle.
- One purpose of financially penalizing later investments is to obtain the greatest amount of money in the Hurricane Reserve as possible, by encouraging early investing and discouraging procrastination.
- Share or option prices are preferably higher when hurricane strike probabilities are higher, and lower when hurricane strike probabilities are lower. Specific details of the pricing formula will preferably be made available on the Hurricane Reserves website, for those who may be interested. Factors influencing the pricing probabilities include the following:
- the number of Hurricane Reserves that may be opened to investment is at the discretion of the Hurricane Reserves management or provider. It is anticipated that two or three Hurricane Reserves will be opened on January 1st of each year. These Hurricane Reserves pertain to possible U.S. hurricane landfalls during that calendar year, whether or not they occur during the generally recognized “hurricane season” (June 1st through November 30th). At the discretion of the Hurricane Reserves Administrators, additional Hurricane Reserves may be opened before the beginning of the “hurricane season,” for example if an unusually large number of hurricanes may be forecast to occur in that year. Similarly, additional Hurricane Reserves may be opened to investment during the hurricane season, particularly if previously open Hurricane Reserves have all been closed by hurricane landfalls (preferably, measured by the eye of the hurricane hitting land), or by imminent possible hurricane landfalls.
- Hurricane Reserves will preferably be closed to further investment when the storm to which they pertain is sufficiently close to landfall, according to the current NHC Advisories for that storm.
- persons should leave home and not participate in the Hurricane Reserves activity, when told to evacuate.
- the exact trigger for Hurricane Reserve closings preferably strikes a balance between public safety (not discouraging prudent evacuation by remaining open too long) and broad participation (not cutting off investments before a given storm is an imminent threat).
- a possible compromise could be to trigger a Hurricane Reserve closure when its tropical cyclone is both at hurricane strength and has generated NHC hurricane warnings for one or more of the counties for which Hurricane Reserve investments may be made.
- Hurricane Reserves would be closed when the operational estimate of its track, as published in the relevant NHC Advisory, has traversed at least one of the counties for which Hurricane Reserve investments may be made.
- a Hurricane Reserve may be closed for these two territories without it necessarily being closed for the rest of the U.S. In such cases, shares or options for counties in the conterminous U.S. that are subsequently traversed by the same storm at hurricane strength will also qualify to receive payouts from that Hurricane Reserve. However, a Hurricane Reserve that is closed because of storm proximity to or landfall on the U.S. mainland will preferably also close for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
- Qualifying Shares or options are a share or option purchased for a county that is subsequently hit by the hurricane to which that Hurricane Reserve pertains. Therefore early investors, whose Qualifying Shares or options were purchased relatively cheaply, will realize larger returns on their investments than will later investors, for whom the share or option prices were higher.
- disbursements from Hurricane Reserves to holders of Qualifying Shares or options will preferably be made by posting the amounts to the credit card account from which the investment was originally made.
- This mechanism has the advantage that the disbursements will be available very quickly, to people who may need these financial resources for rebuilding or other hurricane-related expenses. For example, individuals who may be displaced by extended evacuation from their homes may have especially acute needs for these payouts. These problems are magnified by loss of jobs. It may be necessary to withhold portions of large disbursements on behalf of the IRS.
- Shares or options in counties traversed by a track so calculated, between two consecutive positions at which the storm was at hurricane strength will, in this instance, be Qualifying Shares or options.
- the geographical extent of counties will be defined for example by the Cartographic Boundary Files of the U.S. Census Bureau, that are published at http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/co2000.html. These definitions could also be modified to allow shares or options in counties affected by stronger hurricanes (Category 2+ hurricanes, as indicated by maximum sustained winds reported in the NHC Advisories) to return a larger share or option of Hurricane Reserve assets to their investors.
- the Hurricane Reserves site will automatically flash or change color for several counties which border the county initially selected and urge our investors to spread their investment to include surrounding (collar) counties. In this manner, the investor will, in this instance, have greater opportunity to collect from the Hurricane Reserves actively if damage occurs, but the eye of the hurricane does not enter their county.
- the second point is that, because qualifying counties are determined on the basis of storm positions only at particular, and possibly irregular times, small discrepancies between the calculated track (used to determine Qualifying Shares or options) and the actual track (as determined some months later in the official NHC Tropical Cyclone Report for that storm, or that might be evident at the time of the storm from a series of weather-radar images, for example) can and will occur. Again, it may be advisable for some individuals to invest in nearby counties, in addition to the county(s) in which they have the most interest.
- the U.S. Census Bureau data files are only approximations to the true geographical outlines of many counties. They consist of a collection of line segments, and so will not accurately follow curving county boundaries.
- portions of some counties (particularly relatively small islands) are not included in the Census Bureau's Cartographic Boundary Files.
- the Dry Tortugas are not included in the Cartographic Boundary File for Florida, so that a hurricane passing over this portion of Monroe County, Florida, would not by itself constitute a “hit” on Monroe County for the purpose of determining Qualifying Shares or options.
- Priority can be determined according to the time of landfall on at least one of the counties for which Hurricane Reserves investments may be made. For example, if the hypothetical hurricane “Bob” makes U.S. landfall ahead of hypothetical hurricane “Alice,” “Bob” would be assigned to Hurricane Reserve #1, and “Alice” would be assigned to Hurricane Reserve #2.
- the Hurricane Reserve's activity in one instance, will be administered through a website that calculates share or option prices (or prices of other financial investment units) automatically, according to information from NHC Advisories that are updated at least 4 times daily when one or more Atlantic tropical cyclones are present, and receives payments from investors' credit card accounts, or other financial equivalent, or other alternatives to payment, such as transactions to an investor's brokerage account.
- first-time entrants will need to register.
- Password protection will preferably be employed for credit-card accounts associated with each registration, to facilitate any eventual payouts that may need to be made to that account.
- Social Security information will preferably be required as part of the registration, in order for state and national government agencies to track tax liability on any payouts. Other arrangements could be made for those who access the website through their brokerage service or other third party service.
- share or option prices will be updated (preferably at least four times daily according to the most current Advisory information from NHC), it will be necessary for the site to be unavailable for accepting investments for short, pre-scheduled, periods of time (e.g. every 6 hours).
- these blackout times will be more frequent, in order to accommodate the additional NHC Advisories and to perform other necessary duties.
- some or all of the parts of the website may close from time to time on an unscheduled basis, in order to incorporate new information that is occasionally provided by NHC at times other than the usual Advisory schedules. These additional blackout periods will also allow time for the new information to be disseminated to interested parties.
- the lengths of website blackout times will depend on the speed with which the NHC advisories can be obtained, and their information transformed to updated hurricane probabilities for the Hurricane Reserves. Even when there are no Atlantic tropical cyclones in existence, share or option prices will preferably be updated during the regular (e.g. 6-hourly) blackout periods, with decreasing of the early-entry discount by a small amount.
- FIGS. 4-40 further examples of systems and methods according to principles of the present invention is shown employing one or more graphical user interfaces.
- the graphical user interfaces may be constructed using known computer programs and programming languages.
- the graphical user interfaces are employed to facilitate investment related actions by a user, such as investment research, trial calculations and other activities and implementing financial investment decisions.
- the graphical user interfaces include, in addition to descriptive and information data, active graphical items, such as “buttons” having a conventional shape (e.g. round, oval) as well as special shapes (e.g. a county map or a storm track).
- the financial activity relates to naturally occurring events of the types mentioned herein, such as tropical storm activity.
- the financial activity be related to defined geographical areas (herein referred to as “regions”), represented in map or table form.
- regions defined in various embodiments of the present invention may correspond to well-known geographic or political boundaries, such as county, township or parish borders.
- regions having the approximate size of counties or parishes are preferred in the illustrated examples, regions can be of virtually any size desired, smaller than a county or alternatively, larger, such as groupings of several counties.
- the illustrated embodiments are concerned with coastal regions of the United States, virtually any land are could be used as well. Also, although the illustrated embodiments pertain to first land strike of hurricane storms on the continental U.S., other natural events, such as the earliest official designation of a designated area being flooded, are also contemplated.
- FIG. 24 a system and method for financial activity employing a graphical user interface is shown illustrating an introductory page generally indicated at 610 . Included are active graphical selection item in the form of buttons 612 of various text and graphic types. The buttons 612 provide links to a further detailed entry page illustrated in FIG. 25 . Also shown in FIG. 24 are descriptive data components of the graphical user interface indicated at 614 and linking components indicated at 616 that invoke outside resources that are external to the embodiment of the invention described herein. If desired, the linking components could be internalized to the invention being described, if the system operator should choose to undertake that additional responsibility.
- buttons 620 , 622 are active graphical selection items or buttons 620 , 622 .
- button 620 is automatically selected when the entry page is loaded, although button 622 or neither button could be initially selected.
- button 620 activates a data display showing probabilities for various land regions in real time.
- a passive or static component in the form of a map 630 of the U.S., including eastern and southeastern coastal areas divided into regions 632 . These regions are overlaid by active graphical selection item or buttons 634 corresponding to the shape of the corresponding region 632 .
- a component of the graphical user interface generally indicated at 638 .
- This component is provided in the form of a table, with regions listed in one column, and their corresponding probabilities listed in the adjacent column.
- the tabular component 638 is preferably populated with active graphical selection item or buttons in the form of text table entries, which serve as alternative active graphical selection items to the graphical buttons 634 .
- data component 624 provides a textual description of the real time map and related information displayed.
- Data component 626 provides textual description of the current natural event status.
- a quiet condition is indicated with no ongoing storm having begun and no storms having occurred for the time period of the financial activity.
- the present invention contemplates that the time period of the financial activity may be defined in any manner desired.
- the time period could be the current calendar year, or the storm season for the calendar year (e.g. June to November).
- series a number of consecutive time periods referred to herein as “series,” defined herein as beginning at the year or season and ending, for example, with the first landfall of the year (defined according to preselected rules), and being immediately reset upon first landfall to start a second series for the year, and so forth.
- button 634 comprises one example of an active graphical selection item.
- the button 634 may be activated as desired, by a key press for example, or by merely moving the cursor over the button (an intuitive operation, owing to the graphical content of the button).
- Indicated in FIG. 26 is activation by moving the cursor over a button 634 corresponding to a particular region defined by the financial activity, corresponding to the geographical boundary of Charleston, S.C.
- the graphical user interface preferably responds in at least two ways. First, an information component in the form of a pop-up message 644 appears next to the selected region.
- the pop-up message 644 can contain virtually any desired message content.
- the message contains the probability of a first land strike for the real time indicated in data component 624 .
- other data related to the financial activity such as the text name of the region selected and its inclusion in a regional grouping larger than county.
- the probability of first land strike is monitored by the facilitator of the financial activity and is made available to the participants in a number of different ways.
- the financial activity could monitor disaster estimates, in real time or on a historical basis, for example. Such estimates could be calculated from meteorological and other types of data, but could also be obtained from risk modeling companies and damage estimate services.
- the region selected happens to correspond to a single county, and not part of a larger-sized geographical portion, and accordingly is designated as an “Individual County.” Also, characterization data related to the probability is given in the pop-up message, indicating that the basis for the probability as “historic,” although other bases could be employed as well.
- the probability can be calculated in real time, in response to the user selection, or alternatively, can be extracted from a look-up table of previous calculations.
- the graphical user interface responds to the region selection by adjusting the tabular component 638 to display the text button corresponding to the chosen region in the middle of the table, for ready contextual reference.
- entries in the tabular component 638 are ranked according to decreasing probability values, although virtually any ordering or arrangement desired could be employed as well. Also, in the preferred embodiment, the same result could also be obtained by selecting the region's textual button 636 , as opposed to the graphical button 634 .
- the graphical user interface responds by enlarging a portion of the display showing the selected region and its surrounding regions, in the manner shown in FIG. 27 .
- the selected region is Palm Beach, Fla., designated by the financial activity as an “Individual County,” indicating that the region corresponds to the geographical and/or political boundary of that county of the State of Florida.
- the pop-up message 644 appears, as before, with information for the region selected, and the textual button 636 is highlighted in the tabular component 638 , and centered in that table area.
- additional buttons can be provided to afford the user the opportunity to place an investment for the selected region, and/or to select the neighboring regions, or to select additional individual regions.
- button 622 is provided so that the user can select financial activities related to storm tracks and individual storms that have been recorded, with their related data analyzed to the extent necessary.
- the U.S. government provides official determinations relating to storm events.
- the National Hurricane Center publishes ongoing reports of specific storm activity, starting when a storm is a tropical depression at sea, continuing when a storm increases in intensity to become a tropical storm, and then when the storm further increases in intensity so as to be designated a hurricane.
- official advisories are published at regular intervals, and at the appropriate time, official forecasts are also published.
- This data is, by its nature, historic, although data points along the course of a storm (the storm “track”) are given in the context of real time of near-real time announcements, advisories and predictions. Typically this data is carefully analyzed by one or more responsible government agencies, and is recorded for future use. In one aspect of the present invention, this data is made available to the financial activity user in a comprehensible form that allows a user to digest and correlate large amounts of data, quickly and easily, using graphical and graphics-related tools.
- the illustrated display is preferably invoked by selecting button 622 in FIG. 25 .
- the map 630 of the U.S. Any storm tracks for the current year would be shown, along with their corresponding table entries (to be explained herein). At the current time, there are no storms to report.
- data component 624 is now blank, indicating that a user selection must be made to proceed further.
- an active graphical selection item in the form of a pull-down table 650 that is initially selected to the current year.
- any preceding year or other desired time (such as a seasonal period, a date range, a recurring date or month) provided by the financial activity) can be selected.
- the year 2005 is selected.
- the tabular component 638 is populated with a listing of names of storms that are reported for the selected year 2005.
- Each entry in tabular component 638 is an active graphical selection item button used to invoke the menu sub-selection illustrated in FIG. 30 .
- FIG. 29 also shows a number of active graphical selection item buttons 666 in the graphical form of storm tracks, i.e. paths of storms reported in the selected time period (herein the year 2005). The same result is achieved by either selecting the storm track button 666 or the textual storm name buttons in the tabular component 638 of FIG. 29 .
- the track and forecast advisories are loaded for the selected storm in the selected time period, and the display of FIG. 31 is presented to the user.
- the storm tracks of FIG. 30 are replaced with a single storm track 670 for the selected storm, shown in an expanded (enlarged width) size, and with a plurality of data points 672 , for the point in time indicated in pull-down table.
- the data points may include, for example, official advisories, such as NHC advisories, other warning or information services provided by the NHC or other third party information source.
- NHC advisories are the preferred data points.
- the track and forecast advisories are loaded for the selected storm in the selected time period, and the display of FIG. 31 is presented to the user.
- the storm tracks of FIG. 30 are replaced with a single storm track 670 for the selected storm, shown in an expanded (enlarged width) size, and with a plurality of data points 672 for the point in time indicated in pull-down table.
- the data points may include a variety of different data types, such as forecast advisories or other forecast products by the NHC or other responsible government agency.
- the active graphical selection item table 676 contains a list of storm advisories published by the NHC for the selected storm.
- Each storm advisory has a textual button 678 , preferably corresponding to available storm track data sets that have been reported for each advisory published. Initially, the first table item is selected, and the corresponding data points appear as active graphical selection item buttons 672 . When buttons 672 are selected, corresponding data (not shown) is displayed, including, for example, current (i.e. current as of the time of the advisory) storm location, direction, path velocity, internal wind velocities and other storm related meteorological and climatological data.
- any of the textual advisory name buttons 678 of FIG. 31 can be selected, as desired.
- the sixteenth advisory for the selected storm has been selected, #016, occurring at Sat, August 27th 9 AM.
- the overall track outline has been retained, but the data points along the track have been updated.
- data point 682 indicates the “present” location of the storm, now designated as hurricane Katrina.
- Data points 684 indicate past advisory data points, whereas data points 686 indicate forecast advisories.
- FIG. 33 illustrates the user selection of data for the data point 682 for the (historically) current position of the storm. Selection of the active graphical selection item button 682 causes data component 690 to be displayed. A similar operation is illustrated in FIG.
- FIG. 35 shows the 27th advisory data set that occurred approximately at the time of landfall.
- Data point 694 shows the historically current location of hurricane Katrina. Note that the 36 hour forecast advisory data point 696 lies outside the storm track 670 , indicating that the hurricane level was downgraded approximately 30 hours beyond the selected point in time (i.e. the time of advisory 27 of the 2005 storm Katrina).
- FIG. 36 illustrates the path predicted for the storm at Sat, August 27th 3 PM. Note the predicted track 670 stopping at the southern tip of Illinois, slightly after the passage of 96 hours beyond the historically current time. This figure illustrates how forecast conditions, storm event probabilities, vary during the course of a storm.
- strike probabilities are listed in tabular component 638 for this selected point in time. If desired, any of the advisory time points listed in table 676 could be chosen, and in response, the graphical user interface will prepare probability data. If desired, this data can be prepared for all regions available to a user, or the program can wait until the user selects a particular region. Either the region probabilities can be calculated in real time, or previously calculated values can be extracted from available databases or other records available.
- FIG. 37 illustrates the probability of first landstrike for a selected geographical location or region, for a particular day and time in history, within the context of a given storm occurring in the chosen year.
- An information component in the form of a pop-up message 710 appears next to the selected region.
- Adjacent table 712 displays a ranking of probabilities (and optionally, other data, not shown) for regions in play at the selected date and time in history.
- the table 712 preferably displays a list of textual buttons representing the names of the regions whose data is accessible to the user.
- FIG. 38 illustrates the probabilities of first landstrike for all regions in play, as of a chosen date and time when forecast data available through the textual button 718 , applies.
- a complete set of probability data is made available to a user who is studying the investment conditions that existed for an actual storm, located at the position indicated at 720 .
- the graphical user interface operating in real time, or near-real time, responds to the region selection by adjusting the tabular component 638 to display the text button corresponding to the chosen region in the middle of the table, for ready contextual reference.
- entries in the tabular component 638 are ranked according to decreasing probability values, although virtually any ordering or arrangement desired could be employed as well.
- the single column listing of probabilities for corresponding regions, only a single probability is associated with each region is contemplated for the current storm season. Referring now to FIG. 39 , multiple probabilities (i.e. three) are displayed for each region.
- the arrangement of FIG. 39 reflects a financial activity in which several series are conducted for a given storm season.
- some small number (e.g. three) series are opened and operated concurrently.
- the first of these is closed, and the remaining two continue—they are preferably not initially opened at that time, as set out in the following example where, as soon as the first landfall occurs in a given storm season, the first series is closed, and a second series is declared open.
- the number of series offered by a financial activity for a given storm season is determined by natural events, with the financial activity responding to each land strike in the manner indicated.
- the table component 724 indicates that three series have occurred at the moment in time indicated. As mentioned, it is generally preferred that this moment in time displayed is as close to real time as possible.
- the probabilities for the first three series are tabulated in columns 730 , 732 and 734 .
- Other financial data corresponding to each region listed in the table is also displayed. For example, a theoretical return on investment (assuming an immediate first strike in the region of interest) is given in column 738 , a current total investment is given in column 740 and a per-option purchase cost is indicated in column 742 . Additional data items can be included, either in the spreadsheet style illustrated in FIG. 39 , or in a pop-up or pull-down style, for example, as may be desired.
- An information component in the form of a pop-up message 748 appears next to the selected region.
- Message 748 may include probability data, as indicated and/or additional investment data, such as meteorological data.
- Table component 752 supplies additional data as may be necessary. For example, in addition to providing a textual confirmation of the region selected, the current time, hypothetical rate of return (assuming an immediate strike in the region selected) and option cost are displayed to the user. If the user should decide to proceed, the number of options or shares to be purchased are entered, and the total cost for the transaction is displayed. Alternatively, the user may enter a financial amount, and the programs returns the number of options or shares that can be purchased for the designated amount.
- button 756 the user activates button 756 to finalize the offer to purchase. If the user wishes to explore operation of the financial activity, but also wishes to make certain that an offer to purchase is not tendered, the user can activate button 762 , requiring the user to clear the “trial run” status previously chosen, before proceeding with an actual transaction. This causes a display component 763 to appear with a variety of information, relevant to the user's current proposed position.
- the “floor” is a minimum payout, conditional on the chosen geographical location (in which an investor holds an option, share or other investment unit) being “hit” (i.e. suffers a predefined amount or type of contact with a storm).
- the floor is the same fixed dollar value for all shares or options in a given county (or other geographical region), and for all counties (all such regions). In one example, it is computed in the following way: One parameter in the pricing algorithm is provided as the “par” value. Prices are computed as the product of the probability (as assessed at any given time for the county or region in question) multiplied by the par value (and also multiplied by a time-value-of-money escalator). The par value is called “par” in this example, because, if the market is working smoothly, the payout an investor might expect is at or near the par level.
- the floor in one example, is a fixed percentage (specific value to be determined as a percentage of the par. For the following example: it is assumed that a probability of the selected county (or region) being hit, as assessed at the time of purchase, is 5%, and that par value has been set at $1000. Neglecting the time-value-of-money escalator, $50 is paid for one share or option. If the market works smoothly, the eventual payout, should the selected county be first hit, will be in the neighborhood of $1000. But if market circumstances (e.g., very strong buying interest just before landfall) pushes the actual payout low enough, an expectation is, in the example, given that a payout of least $800, will be received if the floor has been set at 80%.
- market circumstances e.g., very strong buying interest just before landfall
- a mechanism is needed to honor the floor.
- One possibility is that, if a new purchase would drive the current indicated payout (total in an assumed parimutuel pool divided by number of shares or options for this county or region) below the floor level, the price for that new purchase suddenly spikes to the floor level. In most cases this will dissuade the would-be purchaser from buying in a primary market, and motivate that person to seek a better price in a secondary market, if one is made available.
- FIG. 41 shows display component 763 in greater detail.
- display component 763 is provided in the form of a table displaying a variety of data relevant to the user's proposed position, should the designated number of options or shares be purchased. Included is a Landfall Instantaneous Return Calculation, assuming that the storm immediately makes landfall. Following, is a calculation of a Landfall Conditional Floor, setting out the amount the user can expect to receive if the storm should eventually hit the designated geographical area. A variety of secondary market information is also reported to the user, including the current value of the proposed investment in the secondary market, based on market trading. The bid price, asking price and number of available shares are also given.
- the present invention also contemplates that the display component 763 is made available to users when a user logons onto the system at a later date.
- the display component is updated, either automatically, or in response to a key press to keep the user informed of his position in the market.
- FIG. 42 shows a summary display of the user's market status, assuming the user has invested in a number of different positions, schematically indicated by display components 763 in FIG. 42 .
- a total display component 770 resembles the individual display components 763 , except for showing a total of their data components.
- null event is an investment option provided as an alternative to all geographical areas, and indicates the participant's prediction that no hurricane landfall (or occurrence of another natural event) will occur for a given financial activity time period.
- the number of hurricane reserves in which players may participate varies from year to year.
- K hurricane reserves are opened, beginning on 1 January of the year before the hurricane season in question.
- Each of these relate to one of the first K tropical cyclones passing over a portion of the U.S. with at least hurricane-force winds, as determined by the National Hurricane Center or its successors, during the hurricane season (1 June through 30 November).
- additional hurricane reserves may be opened as the hurricane season progresses.
- the Hurricane Reserves entered in a given natural event, less portions for state participation and hurricane reserve management, are paid to entrants according to a formula that accounts for the chances of each hurricane striking the qualifying county(s), as assessed at the time a participant entry is made.
- Entries (investments) in the Hurricane Reserves may be made for individual counties (including the null event, when present in the financial activity), in the form of “shares or options.”
- the price of a share or option varies in one instance, according to the probability of a hurricane strike on the county for which the entry is made, using information available at the time the entry is made, and modified by a discount factor that encourages early entries and penalizes later entries.
- Shares or options are priced relative to a benchmark, or “par” value, defined by an entry for the most vulnerable county historically, (Palm Beach, Fla.) made at the beginning of the hurricane season (1 June).
- Choice of Palm Beach County as the par level is arbitrary because all of the share or option values are relative; but this choice may have investor appeal, in that the prices of entries for all other counties will then reflect an apparent discount.
- the reference probability for a hurricane strike on Palm Beach county, as well as reference probabilities for the other n counties for which entries are accepted, has been derived from a climatological analysis of U.S. landfalling hurricanes that occurred from the late 19 th century through the present.
- This type of analysis can specify the probability that the center of a hurricane-force tropical cyclone will pass within 75 nautical miles (86.25 statute miles) of the county center in a given year.
- These values can be adjusted for the size of a county by estimating the probability that a hurricane will track through the county in a given year, assuming that the county has a circular shape.
- the size-adjusted annual climatological hurricane strike probability is, according to the following Equation (1):
- a i is the area of the county, in square statute miles.
- the 87.25 mile counting radius is used to smooth the somewhat erratic historical record of hurricane tracks.
- Hurricane centers passing within 86.25 miles of the county center (long arrows) have a probability of about 0.31 (ratio of the dashed circle diameter to 172.5 ml) of passing through the county itself.
- FIG. 19 illustrates the geometry behind Equation (1), for the case of Palm Beach County.
- the counties included in the Hurricane Lottery, their approximate areas, and their Q and Q* climatological values are calculated and made available for future reference.
- Time ⁇ - ⁇ of ⁇ - ⁇ entry ⁇ ⁇ adjustment ( 1 + D ) j ⁇ ⁇ date - 152 365 .
- Adjusting share or option prices by multiplying by Equation (3) rewards early entries and penalizes late entries, in part as a compensation for opportunity costs.
- An appropriate value for the discount rate D needs to be determined, and might be varied from year to year to reflect values in then-current financial markets. However, D should also include a very substantial premium over short- or medium-term interest rates in order for this factor to have a significant effect on share or option prices, and so to encourage contributions to the Hurricane Reserves well in advance of the beginning of hurricane season.
- FIG. 20 a graphical plot shows share or option price, relative to par on 1 June, for five values of the annual discount rate, D.
- FIG. 20 indicates values of Equation (3) as a function of date of entry into the Hurricane Reserve, for a range of values of D.
- the relative share or option price is 1.0 for all discount rates at the par date of 1 June.
- D ⁇ 0.04, or 4%) the effect on share or option price, shown by the dashed line, is negligible.
- Equation 4 The price per share or option for a particular county, i, is determined by the probability of a hurricane strike on that county, p i , at the time the entry is made; and in relation to the par value for an entry on Palm Beach county (Equation 2) as of 1 June (Equation 3). These factors are combined to determine the share or option price using the following Equation (4):
- Equation (4) specifies that entries made before 1 June will be cheaper, and entries made after 1 June will be more expensive, as indicated in Equation (3) and in FIG. 20 .
- Equation (4) indicates that the share or option price for county i depends on the probability p i relative to the reference climatological probability p ref for Palm Beach county, through the function ⁇ 1n (1 ⁇ p). This functional form has been chosen in order to obtain share or option prices that are economically logical, particularly toward the extremes of the probability range.
- Equation (4) produces a zero share or option price: shares or options in a county are free if there is absolutely no chance for the Hurricane Reserve to pay off for that county, and shares or options are extremely cheap for counties where the probabilities of being affected by hurricanes (e.g., in west Texas) are vanishingly small.
- the price per share or option will be less than F, and accordingly most participants will receive a discount in the purchase price.
- the hurricane strike probabilities p i in Equation (4) are based on the best information available at any given time, that can reasonably be obtained in an automated way by the Hurricane Reserve's website software. If no Atlantic tropical cyclones are in existence at the time of a Hurricane Reserve entry, that best information will be the unconditional climatological probability of a hurricane strike on the county in question for the k th Hurricane Reserve. These will be referred to in the following as “Stage I” probabilities.
- the probabilities p i in Equation (4) are obtained from climatological values for each county, conditional on the existence of a tropical depression, or tropical cyclone such as a hurricane, in a given sector of ocean. These conditional climatological probabilities will be referred to as “Stage II” probabilities.
- pricing may be determined solely, or partially by market activity, in combination with other factors described herein.
- Stage III Probabilities for hurricane-force winds during the upcoming 5 days. These forecasts provide the “Stage III” probabilities, when they extend over land areas of interest, especially, when they predict landfall within the next 24 hours. To the extent that there may be more than one Atlantic tropical cyclone in existence at a given time, Stage II and/or Stage III probabilities for each need to be combined in order to evaluate p i in Equation (4). In one example, Stage I pricing is determined according to the probabilities and other considerations provided herein, whereas Stage II and Stage III pricing is determined solely by market activity.
- the Stage I probabilities are obtained from climatological values, in a way that follows Equation (2) for the reference strike probability for Palm Beach county.
- Equation (2) the size-corrected annual strike probability Q* is divided by the average number of strikes per year, ?, to reflect the fact that more than one hurricane affects the U.S. per year, on average, and is converted from percentage to fractional probability.
- the Stage I probabilities are further corrected to reflect the fact that, for the second and subsequent hurricane reserves, it is less likely for there to be a corresponding U.S. hurricane landfall. That is, entering the first hurricane reserve is less uncertain than is entering the second hurricane reserve with respect to the Stage I probabilities, and so the share or option prices for the first hurricane reserve should be higher.
- the share or option prices should be higher for the second hurricane reserve than for the third and any subsequent hurricane reserves.
- These adjustments are included in the calculation of the Stage I probabilities using probabilities for different numbers of landfalling hurricanes, as calculated using the Poisson distribution.
- This distribution is a conventional and well-accepted probability model for allocating probability among the possible numbers of hurricanes in a given year when the average number per year is ?.
- the Poisson probabilities for each possible number, X, of U.S. landfalling hurricanes are, according to Equation (5):
- p i (I) is substituted for p i in Equation (4) to determine the share or option price.
- the ratio of Poisson probabilities in Equation (6) is 1, so that Equation (6) for County i is exactly analogous to Equation (2) for the reference county, Palm Beach.
- Equation (2) is nothing more than the Stage I probability for Palm Beach county in the first hurricane reserve.
- these Stage I probabilities are reduced to reflect the fact that the corresponding hurricanes are less likely to occur.
- the purpose of this second factor in Equation (6) is to provide a further price advantage to early entrants in the second and subsequent hurricane reserves, which may not pay off at all, relative to entrants who wait until after the formation of what may become the k th landfalling hurricane before entering.
- Stage II probabilities p i (II) associated with county i being affected by a hurricane may increase from the respective Stage I value, depending on the location and intensity of the storm.
- These Stage II probabilities are obtained by combining the Stage I probabilities, with conditional climatological relative frequencies of hurricane-force winds occurring within 120 n.mi. (138 statute miles) of each county center, given that a tropical cyclone that is or will eventually become a named storm (i.e., at least tropical storm strength) exists in one of 406 2.5 by 2.5 degree regions of the Atlantic ocean, Caribbean Sea, or Gulf of Mexico.
- conditional relative frequencies denote one of these ocean regions in which there is a tropical cyclone as j, and the conditional probability that hurricane force winds due to this storm will eventually occur within 120 n. mi. of the center of county i as Q i,j . That is, for each ocean region j, there is a data table similar to that for the unconditional climatological values Q i , although the conditional Q i,j climatological values are calculated with a larger smoothing radius (120 vs. 75 n. mi.) because there are fewer storms from which to calculate the conditional relative frequencies. Accounting for this larger smoothing radius, the size-adjusted conditional relative frequencies Q* i,j are calculated, analogously to Equation (1), using the following Equation (7):
- q i , j ⁇ .837 ⁇ ⁇ Q i , j * 100 , if ⁇ ⁇ the ⁇ ⁇ storm ⁇ ⁇ in ⁇ ⁇ ocean ⁇ ⁇ sector ⁇ ⁇ j ⁇ ⁇ is ⁇ ⁇ a ⁇ ⁇ unnamed ⁇ ⁇ depression ⁇ ⁇ ( 9 ⁇ a ) Q i , j * 100 , if ⁇ ⁇ the ⁇ ⁇ storm ⁇ ⁇ in ⁇ ⁇ ocean ⁇ ⁇ sector ⁇ j ⁇ ⁇ is ⁇ ⁇ a ⁇ ⁇ tropical ⁇ ⁇ storm ⁇ ( 9 ⁇ b ) 1.72 ⁇ ⁇ Q i , j * 100 , if ⁇ ⁇ the ⁇ ⁇ storm ⁇ ⁇ in ⁇ ⁇ ocean ⁇ ⁇ sector ⁇ j ⁇ ⁇ is ⁇ ⁇ a ⁇ ⁇ hurricane .
- Equation (9) is to reflect the fact that the existence of a hurricane is more threatening, on average, than the presence of a tropical storm, which is in turn more threatening than the presence of a tropical depression.
- the probability from Equation (8) is substituted for p i in Equation (4) when the Stage II risk assessment is appropriate for county i
- Equation (8) reflects the increase in risk, over and above the baseline risk to county i expressed by p i (I) , attributable to the presence of a tropical cyclone in ocean sector j.
- the conditional probabilities q i,j are combined with (rather than replace) the Stage I probabilities in Equation (8), because county i continues to be at (climatological) risk for being struck by a hurricane, even if the storm in ocean sector j fails to make landfall as a hurricane. If the conditional probability q i,j is substantial, p i (II) will be appreciably larger than p i (I) . If the tropical cyclone in ocean sector j has negligible probability of affecting county i as a hurricane, Equation (8) implies p i (II) ⁇ p i (I) .
- Stage III probabilities will be based on the NHC hurricane wind forecasts provided as part of the official advisory for each tropical cyclone.
- the system that is expected to be in place for these forecasts for the 2006, 2007, and later hurricane seasons (currently described by TPC as “experimental”) will produce probability forecasts for wind speeds of at least hurricane force within the upcoming 120 hours (after each advisory), when these probabilities are at least 2.5%. Examples are shown at www.nhc.noaa.gov/feedback-pws-graphics2.shtml?.
- the Stage III probabilities are computed by combining these forecasts with the Stage I probabilities from Equation (6), again because failure of the current tropical cyclone to affect the U.S. as a hurricane does not preclude the k th hurricane reserve from paying out for some subsequent storm.
- Share or options purchased in the k th hurricane reserve for counties traversed by the k th U.S. landfalling hurricane are “qualifying shares or options.”
- these countries are defined by the NHC operational adversaries.
- these counties are defined as those containing a “best track” hurricane position, or a portion of a line connecting two “best track” hurricane positions, as portrayed in the “best track” Table of the official TPC Tropical Cyclone Report for that storm.
- Payouts are preferably determined by dividing the available Hurricane Reserves (e.g. participant entries less state and management percentages) by the number of qualifying shares or options, and paying that amount for each qualifying share or option.
- priority is determined according to time of first U.S. landfall. For example, if the hypothetical hurricane “Alice” makes landfall after hurricane “Bob,” “Bob” would be assigned to Reserve 1 and “Alice” would be assigned to Reserve 2.
- the Hurricane Reserve will preferably be run through a website that calculates share or option prices automatically, according to information from TPC advisories that are updated four times daily. Accordingly, it may be necessary for the site to be unavailable for accepting entries for short, pre-scheduled, periods of time every 6 hours for example. In addition, the website may need to be able to close from time to time on an unscheduled basis, in order to incorporate new information that is occasionally provided by the TPC at other than the scheduled 6-hourly update times. The lengths of these website blackout times, if any, will depend on the speed with which the NHC advisories can be obtained, and their information transformed to updated hurricane probabilities for the hurricane reserve. Even when there are no Atlantic tropical cyclones in existence, share or option prices will be updated during the regular blackout periods, by incrementing the date, jdate in Equation (4), by 0.25, four times daily.
- first-time entrants will need to register.
- Password protection may be preferred if a single credit-card account is to be associated with each registration, in order for any eventual payouts to be made to that account.
- SSN information is preferably made part of the registration in order for the IRS (and possibly also some states) to track tax liability on any payout.
- an outside service can provide credit or other financial services.
- a whole-state entry can be defined by automatically issuing an equal number of share or options for each county in play, within the state in question.
- This approach would place more money on counties more likely to be affected, and so would severely down-weight essentially zero-probability counties, such as those in west Texas.
- the number of shares or options bought for each county is simply the dollar amount to be entered, divided by the sum of share or option prices according to Equation (4), over all counties in that state.
- the sums entered to date in each hurricane reserve (and available for subsequent payout) are preferably posted and continuously updated.
- the “floor” is a minimum payout, conditional on the county or other geographical area in which an investor holds an option, share or other investment unit being “hit.”
- the graphical user interface be used to convey educational information to participants, on an ongoing, developing basis.
- the participants be provided with a rich source of information to inspire further interest in the financial activity and the skills which it sharpens.
- live feeds of various external objective independent information sources be relayed to the participants on an ongoing basis.
- storm locations and changing intensities, along with their projected path can be displayed on a flat map. This type of data can be obtained from the National Hurricane Center, for example.
- Other competing predictions from other independent sources could also be displayed, preferably in different colors on a common map.
- the current dollars invested for particular geographical areas be displayed along with historical odds or probabilities for the geographical area, thus making it possible for participants and interested observers to determine what the payout will be under the specified conditions, if the storm should develop as predicted.
- payoffs for a given geographical area can reflect different times of investment, different total amounts of money invested in the overall financial activity, different severity levels or other characteristics of the storm and the probability that the storm will hit the area of interest, based upon historical data and/or near term predictions.
- the participants and interested observers be able to access a data window showing the current total of reserves invested, and a profile of geographical areas with the number of investments being made for that local area.
- the financial activity have an educational study component to sharpen a participant's knowledge and skills useful for improving their financial position. This knowledge and skill level will also help the participants cope with the reality of being subjected to potentially harmful storm activity. It is also generally preferred that the financial activity display helpful information to participants, such as checklists of items needed to prepare for an oncoming threatening event. These checklists can help organize participant's activities in the decreasing preparation time available. If desired, checklist information can be solicited from participants and posted in a public viewing area. In another example, a display area can also be provided showing constantly updated damage estimates, threats to life and similar public safety-related information.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
Abstract
Description
-
- 1. The location of the county for which the investment is being made. For example, counties in south Florida are historically more likely to be hit than are counties in Massachusetts, on average, and so share or option prices for Florida counties will usually be higher.
- 2. The size of the county. Larger counties present bigger targets, and so shares or options in larger counties will generally be more costly.
- 3. Which of the Hurricane Reserves an investment is made in. For example, shares or options in
Hurricane Reserve # 2 cost less than shares or options inHurricane Reserve # 1, other factors being equal, because it is more likely for one U.S. hurricane to occur in a given year than for two such events to occur. - 4. The location(s) and strength(s) of tropical cyclones in the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and/or Gulf of Mexico, that potentially threaten the United States. Such storms in some locations are more likely to affect particular counties as hurricanes, based on a historical climatological analysis of more than a century of hurricane data, and share or option prices for such counties will increase accordingly. Once a tropical depression is announced by the National Hurricane Center, and continuing through the intensification of the storm, share or option prices continue to increase each time a storm is upgraded in strength, because threats to land are larger for stronger storms. This aspect of the share or option pricing is intended to prevent persons who now have knowledge of a currently existing storm from being unfairly rewarded by having this information, relative to early Hurricane Reserve investors.
C. Opening and Closing Hurricane Reserves
-
- 1. Preferably, a fund closed by an imminent approach of a storm that does not make landfall is, to reopen that series when it is clear from NHC or other official reports that the storm in question poses no further threat.
- 2. Transfer all assets and share or option ownerships to the next Hurricane Reserve. For example, if Hurricane Ophelia had closed
Hurricane Reserve # 3 in 2005, all investments made inHurricane Reserve # 3 would be transferred toHurricane Reserve # 4. Shares or options inHurricane Reserve # 4 would then include those reflecting previous investments inHurricane Reserve # 4, in addition to those purchased by investments in (the now closed)Hurricane Reserve # 3. Assets of the combinedHurricane Reserve # 4 would then have been paid to share or options for counties qualifying according to the path of Hurricane Rita, regardless of whether they represented investments inHurricane Reserve # 3 orHurricane Reserve # 4. - 3. Transfer the assets, but not the share or option ownership, to the next Hurricane Reserve. Here, the money invested in
Hurricane Reserve # 3 for the hurricane that eventually turned out to be Ophelia would have been transferred toHurricane Reserve # 4 and paid according to the track of hurricane Rita, but shares or options purchased in the originalHurricane Reserve # 3 in this example, would not qualify for any disbursements. - 4. Another rule will be needed to govern assets of Hurricane Reserves remaining open at the end of the year. If desired, one of the above options, (although not necessarily the same as that governing mid-season Hurricane Reserve closures) or perhaps, some other option could be chosen for reserve disposition.
- 5. The reserves can be returned to participants, less management costs, if desired.
- 6. Preferably, however, an additional outcome, called “null” event is defined. For the Kth series, this corresponds, to the event wherein there is no Kth U.S. hurricane landfall in the current year. Participants purchasing shares in the null outcome split the pot at the end of hurricane season, if that series is still open as a consequence of a fund remaining open until that time.
where Ai is the area of the county, in square statute miles. The 87.25 mile counting radius is used to smooth the somewhat erratic historical record of hurricane tracks.
Here jdate is the Julian date (consecutive numbering of the days of the year), so that the exponent in Equation (3) is zero, and Equation (3) produces no change in the share or option price, for 1 June (jdate=152). Julian days in the year prior to the hurricane season in question are negative. If the annual discount rate is 5%, then D=0.05.
This equation is the basic pricing tool for the Hurricane Reserves. Here F is an arbitrary pricing factor, that could be chosen according to marketing considerations. It is the par price for one share or option, for Palm Beach County on 1 June. For example, F=1 corresponds to $1/share or option. A higher pricing factor, such as F=100 ($100/share or option) might have the effect of subtly encouraging some participants to enter more money in the Hurricane Reserve. The second factor in Equation (4) specifies that entries made before 1 June will be cheaper, and entries made after 1 June will be more expensive, as indicated in Equation (3) and in
Using these Poisson probabilities with ?=1.7 U.S. landfalling hurricanes per year, on average, the Stage I probabilities for the ith county in kth hurricane reserve are, according to the following Equation (6):
When a Stage I probability is the appropriate risk estimate for county i, pi (I) is substituted for pi in Equation (4) to determine the share or option price. For the k=1st hurricane reserve, the ratio of Poisson probabilities in Equation (6) is 1, so that Equation (6) for County i is exactly analogous to Equation (2) for the reference county, Palm Beach. That is, pref in Equation (2) is nothing more than the Stage I probability for Palm Beach county in the first hurricane reserve. For the second and subsequent hurricane reserves, these Stage I probabilities are reduced to reflect the fact that the corresponding hurricanes are less likely to occur. The purpose of this second factor in Equation (6) is to provide a further price advantage to early entrants in the second and subsequent hurricane reserves, which may not pay off at all, relative to entrants who wait until after the formation of what may become the kth landfalling hurricane before entering.
B. Stage II Probabilities
Stage II probabilities are computed by combining these area-adjusted conditional relative frequencies with the corresponding Stage I probabilities, according to the following Equation (8):
P i (II) =P i (I) +q i,j −P i (I) q i,j, i=1, . . . , n; j=1, . . . , 406; (8)
where, according to the following Equation (9):
Here, 0.837 is the proportion of tropical depressions that have gone on to at least tropical weather strength (1991-2004, reflecting current operational practice at NHC), and 1.72 is the ratio (1886-1998) of the numbers of tropical storms to hurricanes in the Atlantic basin. The purpose of Equation (9) is to reflect the fact that the existence of a hurricane is more threatening, on average, than the presence of a tropical storm, which is in turn more threatening than the presence of a tropical depression. The probability from Equation (8) is substituted for pi in Equation (4) when the Stage II risk assessment is appropriate for county i
p i (III) =p i (I) +f i −p i (I) f i , f i >q i,j, (10a)
or
pi (III)=pi (II), fi<qi,j. (10b)
Equation (10b) includes the possibility that the storm in question may affect a county for which fi=0, because these TPC forecasts are set to zero if the probability is smaller than 2.5%. Again the Stage III probabilities from Equation (10) are substituted for pi in Equation (4) when explicit TPC forecasts for hurricane-force winds are current for some portion of the U.S.
D. Combining Stage II and Stage III Probabilities
p i =p i(1)+p i(2)−p i(1)p i(2). (11)
This probability would be applied equally to the next two hurricane reserves (assuming that there are two or more) that are still active and accepting entries. If there is a third such tropical cyclone, denote its probability for county i, calculated from the Equation appropriate to its Stage, as pi(3). The combined probability for county i in Equation (4) would then be, according to Equation (12)
p i =p i(1)+p i(2)+p i(3)−p i(1)p i(2)−p i(1)p i(3)−p i(2)p i(3)+p i(1)p i(2)p i(3). (12)
This propbability would be applied to the next (up to) three hurrican reserves stillaccepting entries.
IV. Closing Hurricane Reserves
-
- There will often be counties experiencing hurricane-force winds and/or other hurricane impacts that nevertheless do not qualify as having been “hit” according to the definition used by the Hurricane Reserves. This will be the case especially for the larger and more powerful storms. Reserve investors whose intention is to, in effect, supplement their insurance coverage will therefore be encouraged to invest in surrounding counties also. To encourage investors to protect themselves, the Reserves site will automatically flash several counties which border the county initially selected and urge investors to spread their investment to include surrounding counties. In this manner, which we call a “collar” the investor will have greater opportunity to collect reserves if damage occurs but the eye of the hurricane does not enter their county.
- Because qualifying counties are determined on the basis of storm positions only at particular, and possibly irregular times, small discrepancies between the calculated track (used to determine Qualifying Shares or options) and the actual track (as determined some months later in the official NHC Tropical Cyclone Report for that storm, or that might be evident at the time of the storm from a series of weather-radar images, for example) can and will occur. Again, it may be advisable for some individuals to invest in nearby counties, in addition to the county(s) in which they have the most interest.
- The U.S. Census Bureau data files are only approximations to the true geographical outlines of many counties. They consist of a collection of line segments, and so will not accurately follow curving county boundaries. In addition, portions of some counties (particularly relatively small islands) are not included in the Census Bureau's Cartographic Boundary Files. For example, the Dry Tortugas are not included in the Cartographic Boundary File for Florida, so that a hurricane passing over this portion of Monroe County, Florida, would not by itself constitute a “hit” on Monroe county for the purpose of determining Qualifying Shares or options.
VI. Website Features
-
- K=# of hurricane reserves that will be opened initially.
- n=# of counties in the game
- D=discount rate (as discussed above)
- F=pricing factor (as discussed above)
-
- 1. Variability factors affecting at least one of said investment price and said distribution/payout. It is generally preferred that variability factors include, at least a consideration of the time interval between investment and event occurrence and a defined probability of predicted outcome, preferably set at the time of investment. Other variability factors may also be incorporated.
- 2. Prices charged to participants for their chosen investments preferably continually change due, for example, to the variability factors at play at a given time. In general, it is preferred that there be no elimination of price changes to shorten processing delays, or for other reasons.
- 3. Prices at any given time for any predicted outcome are preferably made to be the same for all participants.
- 4. Payouts to successful, qualifying participants are preferably made according to the same set of rules which apply to all participants. Generally speaking, it is preferred that no rewards be given for preferred participants.
- 5. All winners (qualifying participants) share or option the pot. That is, it is generally preferred that there are no odds multiplying a participant's investment. Also, it is generally preferred that payouts are not made from the provider's personal account—unlike the “House” of certain gambling activities which pays out winning bets from its own account.
- 6. Provider does not engage as a participant. For example, it is generally preferred it that there be no hedging where, for example, there may be excessive bidding.
- 7. Participants do not compete against the “house” i.e. the provider.
- 8. In certain instances, it may be preferable to limit financial activity to only the United States and its territories and possessions.
- 9. Financial activity encompasses a single event or type of event over a given “season”.
- 10. It is generally preferred that the participants be able to objectively and independently observe the events for themselves, as they unfold.
- 11. It is generally preferred that, apart from financial responsibility, a participant's investment be “accepted” only in terms of data format. Optionally, acceptance can be related to an optional investment cap. It is generally preferred that there be no extra qualification for each investment occurrence.
- 12. It is generally preferred that financial activity be carried out as much as possible in real-time, and that this be made possible by virtue of rules definitions, especially definitions of events and event outcomes which occur in a well defined environment/system. It is generally preferred that the selection of events for the financial activity be limited to an absolute minimum—i.e. a single event.
- 13. It is generally preferred that the financial activity be restricted to tropical weather events, and in one instance, only to hurricane events.
- 14. It is generally preferred that the financial activity be further restricted to events comprising at least one of said landfall and said land track. It may also be preferable in certain instances to limit financial activity to hurricanes having a certain category strength at some defined time during the ongoing financial activity.
- 15. It is preferable, in certain instances, that multiple stages of probability assessment be applied to at least one of said investment and said payout.
- 16. It is preferable in certain instances that the external objective independent information source be limited to the National Hurricane Center (NHC), and optionally to its subsidiary and/or related agencies (e.g. TPC).
Other Preferences
Claims (11)
Priority Applications (8)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/901,050 US7584134B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-09-14 | Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather events |
US11/981,414 US7783542B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-10-31 | Financial activity with graphical user interface based on natural peril events |
US11/981,504 US7783543B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-10-31 | Financial activity based on natural peril events |
US11/981,790 US7783544B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-10-31 | Financial activity concerning tropical weather events |
US12/221,935 US8266042B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2008-08-06 | Financial activity based on natural peril events |
US12/456,449 US20090259581A1 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2009-06-17 | Financial activity relating to natural peril events |
US12/462,289 US7917420B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2009-07-31 | Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather events |
US13/507,643 US20130024342A1 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2012-07-13 | Activity relating to ongoing financial events |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US63778404P | 2004-12-21 | 2004-12-21 | |
US11/312,783 US7584133B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2005-12-20 | Financial activity based on tropical weather events |
US11/901,050 US7584134B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-09-14 | Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather events |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/312,783 Continuation-In-Part US7584133B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2005-12-20 | Financial activity based on tropical weather events |
Related Child Applications (5)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/312,662 Continuation-In-Part US7693766B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2005-12-20 | Financial activity based on natural events |
US11/981,504 Continuation-In-Part US7783543B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-10-31 | Financial activity based on natural peril events |
US11/981,414 Continuation-In-Part US7783542B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-10-31 | Financial activity with graphical user interface based on natural peril events |
US11/981,790 Continuation-In-Part US7783544B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-10-31 | Financial activity concerning tropical weather events |
US12/462,289 Continuation US7917420B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2009-07-31 | Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather events |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080059355A1 US20080059355A1 (en) | 2008-03-06 |
US7584134B2 true US7584134B2 (en) | 2009-09-01 |
Family
ID=46124168
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/901,050 Active - Reinstated US7584134B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-09-14 | Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather events |
US12/462,289 Active - Reinstated 2026-01-28 US7917420B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2009-07-31 | Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather events |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/462,289 Active - Reinstated 2026-01-28 US7917420B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2009-07-31 | Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather events |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7584134B2 (en) |
Cited By (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080147417A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | David Friedberg | Systems and Methods for Automated Weather Risk Assessment |
US20080248868A1 (en) * | 2006-07-17 | 2008-10-09 | Brian Pilcher | Trading system and method using a virtual pari-mutuel pool |
US20080249955A1 (en) * | 2007-04-03 | 2008-10-09 | Weatherbill, Inc. | System and method for creating customized weather derivatives |
US20090259521A1 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2009-10-15 | Yitts Anthony M | Method of Identifying Innovations Possessing Business Disrupting Properties |
US20090303056A1 (en) * | 2005-11-15 | 2009-12-10 | Swiss Reinsurance Company | Trigger system for monitoring and/or control devices and/or early warning systems for nascent and/or occurring cyclones |
US8505813B2 (en) | 2009-09-04 | 2013-08-13 | Bank Of America Corporation | Customer benefit offer program enrollment |
US20140114879A1 (en) * | 2012-10-23 | 2014-04-24 | Santosh John Thomas | Systems and methods for providing investing opportunities |
US8751298B1 (en) | 2011-05-09 | 2014-06-10 | Bank Of America Corporation | Event-driven coupon processor alert |
US20150170288A1 (en) * | 2013-12-12 | 2015-06-18 | The Travelers Indemnity Company | Systems and methods for weather event-based insurance claim handling |
US20150332146A1 (en) * | 2014-05-15 | 2015-11-19 | National Taiwan University | Device and method for comparison of multiple tropical cyclone routes |
US9892419B1 (en) | 2011-05-09 | 2018-02-13 | Bank Of America Corporation | Coupon deposit account fraud protection system |
US10313480B2 (en) | 2017-06-22 | 2019-06-04 | Bank Of America Corporation | Data transmission between networked resources |
USD864233S1 (en) * | 2018-06-04 | 2019-10-22 | Skyrock Partners, LLC | Display screen with a list generation graphical user interface |
US10511692B2 (en) | 2017-06-22 | 2019-12-17 | Bank Of America Corporation | Data transmission to a networked resource based on contextual information |
US10524165B2 (en) | 2017-06-22 | 2019-12-31 | Bank Of America Corporation | Dynamic utilization of alternative resources based on token association |
USD891470S1 (en) * | 2015-10-20 | 2020-07-28 | 23Andme, Inc. | Display screen or portion therof with graphical user interface |
USD894960S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-01 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD895679S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-08 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD895678S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-08 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD896271S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-15 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD896839S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-22 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD896840S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-22 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD897372S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-29 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
US11188853B2 (en) | 2019-09-30 | 2021-11-30 | The Travelers Indemnity Company | Systems and methods for artificial intelligence (AI) damage triage and dynamic resource allocation, routing, and scheduling |
USD945485S1 (en) * | 2020-12-15 | 2022-03-08 | Cowbell Cyber, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with a graphical user interface |
USD946025S1 (en) * | 2020-10-19 | 2022-03-15 | Splunk Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof having a graphical user interface for monitoring information |
USD946026S1 (en) * | 2020-10-19 | 2022-03-15 | Splunk Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof having a graphical user interface for a metrics-based presentation of information |
USD946020S1 (en) * | 2020-10-19 | 2022-03-15 | Splunk Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof having a graphical user interface for an application home page |
USD955409S1 (en) * | 2020-12-15 | 2022-06-21 | Cowbell Cyber, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with a graphical user interface |
US20220253937A1 (en) * | 2016-07-01 | 2022-08-11 | Cfph, Llc | Interface for landfall location options |
USD968456S1 (en) * | 2021-04-05 | 2022-11-01 | Chemtreat, Inc | Portion of a monitor display with graphical user interface |
USD968457S1 (en) * | 2021-04-05 | 2022-11-01 | Chemtreat, Inc | Portion of a monitor display with graphical user interface |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100082253A1 (en) * | 2008-09-26 | 2010-04-01 | Buchanan William E | Strategic management system to stop the development of hurricanes and abate the intensity of tropical storms and hurricanes |
USD774529S1 (en) | 2010-11-04 | 2016-12-20 | Bank Of America Corporation | Display screen with graphical user interface for funds transfer |
USD774528S1 (en) | 2011-02-21 | 2016-12-20 | Bank Of America Corporation | Display screen with graphical user interface for funds transfer |
USD774527S1 (en) | 2011-02-21 | 2016-12-20 | Bank Of America Corporation | Display screen with graphical user interface for funds transfer |
USD774526S1 (en) | 2011-02-21 | 2016-12-20 | Bank Of America Corporation | Display screen with graphical user interface for funds transfer |
TWI484434B (en) * | 2012-08-17 | 2015-05-11 | Systex Corp | Read the disk system and its data display method |
USD770478S1 (en) | 2012-09-07 | 2016-11-01 | Bank Of America Corporation | Communication device with graphical user interface |
US10783535B2 (en) * | 2016-05-16 | 2020-09-22 | Cerebri AI Inc. | Business artificial intelligence management engine |
US10762563B2 (en) | 2017-03-10 | 2020-09-01 | Cerebri AI Inc. | Monitoring and controlling continuous stochastic processes based on events in time series data |
US10402723B1 (en) | 2018-09-11 | 2019-09-03 | Cerebri AI Inc. | Multi-stage machine-learning models to control path-dependent processes |
US11941225B1 (en) * | 2018-10-04 | 2024-03-26 | United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) | Systems and methods for self-directed investing |
US11068942B2 (en) | 2018-10-19 | 2021-07-20 | Cerebri AI Inc. | Customer journey management engine |
Citations (279)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3573747A (en) | 1969-02-24 | 1971-04-06 | Institutional Networks Corp | Instinet communication system for effectuating the sale or exchange of fungible properties between subscribers |
US3874584A (en) | 1971-08-31 | 1975-04-01 | Terence Patrick Grattan Foley | Forecasting apparatus |
US4235001A (en) | 1975-09-17 | 1980-11-25 | Haruhiro Matino | Gas display panel fabrication method |
US4323770A (en) | 1978-08-16 | 1982-04-06 | Societe D'etude De Systems Avances Et D'amenagements | Unit particularly for taking stakes and possibly determining the winners in a game such as a national lotto game |
US4334270A (en) | 1972-08-11 | 1982-06-08 | Towers Frederic C | Securities valuation system |
US4346442A (en) | 1980-07-29 | 1982-08-24 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated | Securities brokerage-cash management system |
US4376978A (en) | 1980-07-29 | 1983-03-15 | Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith | Securities brokerage-cash management system |
US4412287A (en) | 1975-05-29 | 1983-10-25 | Braddock Iii Walter D | Automated stock exchange |
US4554418A (en) | 1983-05-16 | 1985-11-19 | Toy Frank C | Information monitoring and notification method and apparatus |
US4566066A (en) | 1972-08-11 | 1986-01-21 | Towers Frederic C | Securities valuation system |
US4674044A (en) | 1985-01-30 | 1987-06-16 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. | Automated securities trading system |
US4722055A (en) | 1984-03-08 | 1988-01-26 | College Savings Bank | Methods and apparatus for funding future liability of uncertain cost |
US4739478A (en) | 1984-11-21 | 1988-04-19 | Lazard Freres & Co. | Methods and apparatus for restructuring debt obligations |
US4751640A (en) | 1984-06-14 | 1988-06-14 | Citibank, Na | Automated investment system |
US4752877A (en) | 1984-03-08 | 1988-06-21 | College Savings Bank | Method and apparatus for funding a future liability of uncertain cost |
US4766539A (en) | 1985-03-08 | 1988-08-23 | Fox Henry L | Method of determining the premium for and writing a policy insuring against specified weather conditions |
US4823265A (en) | 1987-05-11 | 1989-04-18 | Nelson George E | Renewable option accounting and marketing system |
US4823264A (en) | 1986-05-27 | 1989-04-18 | Deming Gilbert R | Electronic funds transfer system |
US4831526A (en) | 1986-04-22 | 1989-05-16 | The Chubb Corporation | Computerized insurance premium quote request and policy issuance system |
US4839804A (en) | 1986-12-30 | 1989-06-13 | College Savings Bank | Method and apparatus for insuring the funding of a future liability of uncertain cost |
US4842278A (en) | 1986-06-02 | 1989-06-27 | Victor Markowicz | Hierarchical lottery network with selection from differentiated playing pools |
US4903201A (en) | 1983-11-03 | 1990-02-20 | World Energy Exchange Corporation | Automated futures trading exchange |
US4933842A (en) | 1988-02-29 | 1990-06-12 | Tesseract Corporation | Automated investment fund accounting system |
US4953085A (en) | 1987-04-15 | 1990-08-28 | Proprietary Financial Products, Inc. | System for the operation of a financial account |
US4975840A (en) | 1988-06-17 | 1990-12-04 | Lincoln National Risk Management, Inc. | Method and apparatus for evaluating a potentially insurable risk |
US4980826A (en) | 1983-11-03 | 1990-12-25 | World Energy Exchange Corporation | Voice actuated automated futures trading exchange |
US5077665A (en) | 1989-05-25 | 1991-12-31 | Reuters Limited | Distributed matching system |
US5101353A (en) | 1989-05-31 | 1992-03-31 | Lattice Investments, Inc. | Automated system for providing liquidity to securities markets |
US5126936A (en) | 1989-09-01 | 1992-06-30 | Champion Securities | Goal-directed financial asset management system |
US5136501A (en) | 1989-05-26 | 1992-08-04 | Reuters Limited | Anonymous matching system |
US5148365A (en) | 1989-08-15 | 1992-09-15 | Dembo Ron S | Scenario optimization |
US5220500A (en) | 1989-09-19 | 1993-06-15 | Batterymarch Investment System | Financial management system |
US5275400A (en) | 1992-06-11 | 1994-01-04 | Gary Weingardt | Pari-mutuel electronic gaming |
WO1994018640A1 (en) | 1993-02-10 | 1994-08-18 | Turk James J | Method and system for commodity-based currency for payment of accounts |
WO1995019614A2 (en) | 1994-01-18 | 1995-07-20 | Mohanrao Mukkamala V | Central bank's issue of new or created money to fund federal budget deficits, programs and projects using engineering judgment |
US5444819A (en) | 1992-06-08 | 1995-08-22 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Economic phenomenon predicting and analyzing system using neural network |
WO1995022883A2 (en) | 1994-02-24 | 1995-08-31 | Grantley Thomas Aubrey Hall | Specified return determinator |
WO1995026005A1 (en) | 1994-03-23 | 1995-09-28 | Belzberg Sydney H | Computerized stock exchange trading system |
US5491629A (en) | 1994-03-04 | 1996-02-13 | Strategic Weather Services | System and method for determining the impact of weather and other factors on managerial planning applications |
WO1996012242A1 (en) | 1994-10-13 | 1996-04-25 | World Trade Centers Association, Inc. | Full service trade system |
US5519605A (en) | 1994-10-24 | 1996-05-21 | Olin Corporation | Model predictive control apparatus and method |
WO1996021192A1 (en) | 1995-01-04 | 1996-07-11 | Citibank, N.A. | System and method for electronic sale of goods |
US5568378A (en) | 1994-10-24 | 1996-10-22 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Variable horizon predictor for controlling dead time dominant processes, multivariable interactive processes, and processes with time variant dynamics |
US5608620A (en) | 1990-03-19 | 1997-03-04 | Lundgren; Carl A. | Method of eliciting unbiased forecasts by relating a forecaster's pay to the forecaster's contribution to a collective forecast |
EP0770967A2 (en) | 1995-10-26 | 1997-05-02 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Decision support system for the management of an agile supply chain |
NL1002790C1 (en) | 1996-04-04 | 1997-05-13 | Pieter Van Der Kuur | Financial instrument based on forecasts of races, opinion poll results, etc. - allows buyers and sellers of opinions to invest fixed sums with predictable winning amounts |
WO1997022073A1 (en) | 1995-12-12 | 1997-06-19 | Citibank, N.A. | System and method for performing on-line reviews and approvals of credit and liability applications |
US5663547A (en) | 1994-10-05 | 1997-09-02 | Ziarno; Witold A. | Method of fund-raising with a keyless contribution and gift commitment management device |
US5665952A (en) | 1993-09-07 | 1997-09-09 | Ziarno; Witold A. | Method of streamlining the acknowledgement of a multiplicity of contribution or gift commitments made at a plurality of remote locations to distinct fund-raising organizations and gift recipients and system therefor |
US5671363A (en) | 1992-09-01 | 1997-09-23 | Merril Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. | Private stock option account control and exercise system |
US5689799A (en) | 1995-04-26 | 1997-11-18 | Wink Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for routing confidential information |
US5689650A (en) | 1995-02-23 | 1997-11-18 | Mcclelland; Glenn B. | Community reinvestment act network |
US5689649A (en) | 1991-03-01 | 1997-11-18 | Altman; Robert | System for operation of a combination mortgage, equity load and savings plan |
US5696366A (en) | 1994-10-05 | 1997-12-09 | Ziarno; Witold A. | Method for streamlining the giving of contribution and gift commitments |
US5712985A (en) | 1989-09-12 | 1998-01-27 | Lee; Michael D. | System and method for estimating business demand based on business influences |
WO1998013776A1 (en) | 1996-09-24 | 1998-04-02 | Rco Software Limited | Computer aided risk management in multiple-parameter physical systems |
US5745383A (en) | 1996-02-15 | 1998-04-28 | Barber; Timothy P. | Method and apparatus for efficient threshold inference |
US5749785A (en) | 1994-09-21 | 1998-05-12 | Rossides; Michael T. | Communications system using bets |
US5794207A (en) | 1996-09-04 | 1998-08-11 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers |
US5796932A (en) * | 1994-01-14 | 1998-08-18 | Strategic Weather Services | User interface for graphically displaying the impact of weather on managerial planning |
US5802500A (en) | 1992-05-06 | 1998-09-01 | The Evergreen Group Incorporated | System and method for computing a financial projection of a prefunding program for other postretirement employee benefits under FASB statement 106 |
US5806048A (en) | 1995-10-12 | 1998-09-08 | Mopex, Inc. | Open end mutual fund securitization process |
US5819238A (en) | 1996-12-13 | 1998-10-06 | Enhanced Investment Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and accompanying methods for automatically modifying a financial portfolio through dynamic re-weighting based on a non-constant function of current capitalization weights |
US5830068A (en) | 1995-09-08 | 1998-11-03 | Ods Technologies, L.P. | Interactive wagering systems and processes |
US5830069A (en) | 1996-09-13 | 1998-11-03 | Wango World Inc. | Wide area networking gaming |
US5832456A (en) | 1996-01-18 | 1998-11-03 | Strategic Weather Services | System and method for weather adapted, business performance forecasting |
US5845266A (en) | 1995-12-12 | 1998-12-01 | Optimark Technologies, Inc. | Crossing network utilizing satisfaction density profile with price discovery features |
US5848396A (en) | 1996-04-26 | 1998-12-08 | Freedom Of Information, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining behavioral profile of a computer user |
US5855514A (en) | 1997-05-16 | 1999-01-05 | Stuart J. Kamille | Probability game with insured winning |
US5878141A (en) | 1995-08-25 | 1999-03-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Computerized purchasing system and method for mediating purchase transactions over an interactive network |
WO1999010815A1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 1999-03-04 | Grenex Corporation | Exchange method and apparatus |
WO1999019821A1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 1999-04-22 | Derivatives Net, Inc. | Systems, methods and computer program products for electronic trading of financial instruments |
WO1999009500A3 (en) | 1997-08-01 | 1999-04-29 | Realkredit Danmark As | Method and data system for determining financial instruments for use in the funding of a loan |
WO1999023592A1 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 1999-05-14 | Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. | Computer method and apparatus for optimizing portfolios of multiple participants |
WO1999030261A1 (en) | 1997-12-10 | 1999-06-17 | Financial Engines, Inc. | User interface for a financial advisory system |
WO1999031613A1 (en) | 1997-12-17 | 1999-06-24 | Omega Consulting, Inc. | A method and apparatus for bundled asset trading |
US5926800A (en) | 1995-04-24 | 1999-07-20 | Minerva, L.P. | System and method for providing a line of credit secured by an assignment of a life insurance policy |
US5931467A (en) | 1997-05-16 | 1999-08-03 | Stuart J. Kamille | Probability game |
US5946666A (en) | 1996-05-21 | 1999-08-31 | Albert Einstein Healthcare Network | Monitoring device for financial securities |
WO1999046720A1 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 1999-09-16 | Cha Technologies Services, Inc. | Automatically invoked intermediation process for network purchases |
US5970479A (en) | 1992-05-29 | 1999-10-19 | Swychco Infrastructure Services Pty. Ltd. | Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of risk management contracts |
WO1999056232A1 (en) | 1998-04-27 | 1999-11-04 | Omega Consulting, Inc. | Apparatus and method for trading of bundled assets |
US5987433A (en) | 1996-06-03 | 1999-11-16 | General Electric Company | Method and system for developing a time horizon based investment strategy |
WO1999024928B1 (en) | 1997-11-06 | 1999-12-09 | Intertrust Tech Corp | Systems and methods for matching, selecting, narrowcasting, and/or classifying based on rights management and/or other information |
US6015345A (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2000-01-18 | Supra Engineering Limited | Conducting games of chance using predicted sum of scores |
US6026364A (en) | 1997-07-28 | 2000-02-15 | Whitworth; Brian L. | System and method for replacing a liability with insurance and for analyzing data and generating documents pertaining to a premium financing mechanism paying for such insurance |
US6024641A (en) | 1997-11-19 | 2000-02-15 | Sarno; Robert A. | Method, apparatus and system for lottery gaming |
WO2000011570A1 (en) | 1998-08-25 | 2000-03-02 | Accompany Inc. | On-line marketing system and method |
WO2000017795A1 (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2000-03-30 | I2 Technologies, Inc. | System and method for managing atp data in a distributed supply chain planning environment |
WO2000021013A1 (en) | 1998-10-06 | 2000-04-13 | Andrew Lustig | Method and apparatus for auctions with automatic matching |
US6064985A (en) | 1998-01-21 | 2000-05-16 | Assured Equities, Inc. | Automated portfolio management system with internet datafeed |
WO2000029923A2 (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2000-05-25 | Trade Access, Inc | Sponsored community system and method |
WO2000029973A1 (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2000-05-25 | Trade Access, Inc. | Electronic non-repudiation system and method |
US6078901A (en) | 1997-04-03 | 2000-06-20 | Ching; Hugh | Quantitative supply and demand model based on infinite spreadsheet |
US6078904A (en) | 1998-03-16 | 2000-06-20 | Saddle Peak Systems | Risk direct asset allocation and risk resolved CAPM for optimally allocating investment assets in an investment portfolio |
US6078905A (en) | 1998-03-27 | 2000-06-20 | Pich-Lewinter; Eva | Method for optimizing risk management |
US6085175A (en) | 1998-07-02 | 2000-07-04 | Axiom Software Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for determining value at risk of a financial portfolio |
US6085174A (en) | 1997-09-23 | 2000-07-04 | Edelman; Ric | Computer assisted and/or implemented process and architecture for administering an investment and/or retirement program |
US6105005A (en) | 1997-09-15 | 2000-08-15 | Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. | System for enhanced financial trading support |
WO2000058858A1 (en) | 1999-03-29 | 2000-10-05 | Elik Szewach | Gaming systems and methods |
US6134536A (en) | 1992-05-29 | 2000-10-17 | Swychco Infrastructure Services Pty Ltd. | Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of risk management contracts |
US6135884A (en) | 1997-08-08 | 2000-10-24 | International Game Technology | Gaming machine having secondary display for providing video content |
US6167378A (en) | 1997-01-21 | 2000-12-26 | Webber, Jr.; Donald Gary | Automated back office transaction method and system |
WO2001025987A1 (en) | 1999-10-04 | 2001-04-12 | James Joseph Deupree | System for hiring and engagement management of qualified professionals |
US6224486B1 (en) | 1996-04-22 | 2001-05-01 | Walker Digital, Llc | Database driven online distributed tournament system |
US6229810B1 (en) | 1997-12-31 | 2001-05-08 | At&T Corp | Network server platform for a hybrid fiber twisted pair local loop network service architecture |
US6236973B1 (en) | 1999-06-02 | 2001-05-22 | Greg Dillard | Apparatus and method for providing collateral construction loan insurance coverage |
US6236972B1 (en) | 1998-12-02 | 2001-05-22 | Gary Shkedy | Method and apparatus for facilitating transactions on a commercial network system |
US6236977B1 (en) | 1999-01-04 | 2001-05-22 | Realty One, Inc. | Computer implemented marketing system |
US6278983B1 (en) | 1999-01-11 | 2001-08-21 | Owen Edward Ball | Automated resource allocation and management system |
WO2001067308A1 (en) | 2000-03-08 | 2001-09-13 | Fuerst-Shvadron | A computer system and method for providing a seller/buyer environment over a network |
US20010021911A1 (en) | 2000-03-03 | 2001-09-13 | Hideki Ohmoto | Automatic designing apparatus and method of financial article and recording medium storing financial article automatic designing program therein |
US6292787B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2001-09-18 | Financial Engines, Inc. | Enhancing utility and diversifying model risk in a portfolio optimization framework |
US20010037282A1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2001-11-01 | Hideki Yoneda | Method for trading a manufacturing capacity and manufacturing capacity trading system |
US20010037287A1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2001-11-01 | Broadbent David F. | Method and apparatus for an advanced speech recognition portal for a mortgage loan management system |
US6315666B1 (en) | 1997-08-08 | 2001-11-13 | International Game Technology | Gaming machines having secondary display for providing video content |
US6317726B1 (en) | 1996-12-30 | 2001-11-13 | Netfolio, Inc. | Automated strategies for investment management |
US6321212B1 (en) | 1999-07-21 | 2001-11-20 | Longitude, Inc. | Financial products having a demand-based, adjustable return, and trading exchange therefor |
US6319122B1 (en) | 1998-12-31 | 2001-11-20 | Walker Digital, Llc | Electronic amusement device and method for providing payouts based on the activity of other devices |
US20010044767A1 (en) | 1999-03-19 | 2001-11-22 | Primex Holdings Llc | Auction market with price improvement mechanism |
US20010047326A1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2001-11-29 | Broadbent David F. | Interface system for a mortgage loan originator compliance engine |
US6330551B1 (en) | 1998-08-06 | 2001-12-11 | Cybersettle.Com, Inc. | Computerized dispute resolution system and method |
US20010056396A1 (en) | 2000-06-27 | 2001-12-27 | Tadashi Goino | Auction methods, auction systems and servers |
US6336103B1 (en) | 1989-08-02 | 2002-01-01 | Nardin L. Baker | Rapid method of analysis for correlation of asset return to future financial liabilities |
US6345239B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2002-02-05 | Accenture Llp | Remote demonstration of business capabilities in an e-commerce environment |
US20020032644A1 (en) | 1998-10-08 | 2002-03-14 | Corby Paul M. | System, method, and computer program product for valuating wather-based financial instruments |
US20020032646A1 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2002-03-14 | Francis Sweeney | System and method of automated brokerage for risk management services and products |
US20020040339A1 (en) | 2000-10-02 | 2002-04-04 | Dhar Kuldeep K. | Automated loan processing system and method |
US6370516B1 (en) | 1998-03-16 | 2002-04-09 | John P Reese | Computer based device to report the results of codified methodologies of financial advisors applied to a single security or element |
US20020046137A1 (en) | 1997-07-11 | 2002-04-18 | Bid/Ask, L.L.C. | Method for computerized wagering |
US20020046144A1 (en) | 1992-10-28 | 2002-04-18 | Graff Richard A. | Further improved system and methods for computing to support decomposing property into separately valued components |
US6375571B1 (en) | 1999-09-02 | 2002-04-23 | Sony Computer Entertaiment, Inc. | Entertainment system, entertainment apparatus, recording medium, and program |
US20020069155A1 (en) | 2000-10-17 | 2002-06-06 | John Nafeh | Methods and apparatus for formulation, initial public or private offering, and secondary market trading of risk management contracts |
US20020073021A1 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2002-06-13 | Ginsberg Philip M. | Real-time interactive wagering on event outcomes |
US6415267B1 (en) | 1999-06-08 | 2002-07-02 | Bernard P Hagan | System for monitoring increasing income financial products |
US6427132B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2002-07-30 | Accenture Llp | System, method and article of manufacture for demonstrating E-commerce capabilities via a simulation on a network |
US6430542B1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2002-08-06 | American Express Financial Corporation | Computer-implemented program for financial planning and advice system |
US20020120558A1 (en) | 2001-02-27 | 2002-08-29 | Reid William Joseph | System for managing risks by combining risk insurance policy investments with risk prevention computer-based technology investments using common measurement methods |
US20020130899A1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2002-09-19 | Mark Ryan | Weather information delivery systems and methods providing planning functionality and navigational tools |
US6453687B2 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2002-09-24 | Robertshaw Controls Company | Refrigeration monitor unit |
US20020138417A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2002-09-26 | David Lawrence | Risk management clearinghouse |
US20020138413A1 (en) | 2001-03-26 | 2002-09-26 | Creamer David E. | Commercial mortgage closing process |
US6460029B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2002-10-01 | Microsoft Corporation | System for improving search text |
US20020147670A1 (en) | 1999-07-21 | 2002-10-10 | Jeffrey Lange | Digital options having demand-based, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor |
US6470321B1 (en) | 2000-04-17 | 2002-10-22 | Forthcoming Llp | System, method, and computer program product for providing financial protection of equity investments |
US20020161681A1 (en) | 1999-03-12 | 2002-10-31 | Richard Paul Richman | Method and system for converting a designated portion of future social security and other retirement payments to current benefits |
US20030009419A1 (en) | 2001-06-11 | 2003-01-09 | Chavez R. Martin | Risk management system and trade engine with automatic trade feed and market data feed |
US6508710B1 (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2003-01-21 | Virtgame Corp. | Gaming system with location verification |
US6513031B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2003-01-28 | Microsoft Corporation | System for improving search area selection |
US20030023534A1 (en) | 2001-06-11 | 2003-01-30 | Shubha Kadambe | Method and apparatus for determining and assessing information to be collected based on information-theoretic measures |
US6527172B1 (en) | 1998-11-25 | 2003-03-04 | Diebold, Incorporated | Automated banking machine enclosure |
US6527270B2 (en) | 2001-02-13 | 2003-03-04 | Casino Advisory Services, Inc. | Method of effecting multiple wagers on a sports or other event |
US6546375B1 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2003-04-08 | Johns Hopkins University | Apparatus and method of pricing financial derivatives |
US20030078869A1 (en) | 2001-10-19 | 2003-04-24 | Williams James Benjamin | Interactive control interface for evaluating and executing a strategy for controlling investment risk |
US6560580B1 (en) | 1996-12-13 | 2003-05-06 | Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. (Cflp) | Automated auction protocol processor |
US20030088532A1 (en) | 2001-10-11 | 2003-05-08 | Hampshire John B. | Method and apparatus for learning to classify patterns and assess the value of decisions |
US20030120426A1 (en) * | 1996-06-04 | 2003-06-26 | Baron Services, Inc. | Systems and methods for distributing real-time site-specific weather information |
US20030126073A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2003-07-03 | David Lawrence | Charitable transaction risk management clearinghouse |
US20030126059A1 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2003-07-03 | Hensley Roy Austin | Intelectual property (IP) brokering system and method |
US6591232B1 (en) | 1999-06-08 | 2003-07-08 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Method of selecting an optimum mix of resources to maximize an outcome while minimizing risk |
US20030135441A1 (en) | 2001-12-17 | 2003-07-17 | Cfph, L.L.C. | Systems and methods for durable goods futures market |
US6601059B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2003-07-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Computerized searching tool with spell checking |
US20030149657A1 (en) | 2001-12-05 | 2003-08-07 | Diane Reynolds | System and method for measuring and managing operational risk |
US20030177083A1 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2003-09-18 | Mont Marco Casassa | Automated negotiation agent and method of evaluating risk and trust in contract negotiation by electronic means |
US20030177087A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2003-09-18 | David Lawrence | Transaction surveillance |
US20030208429A1 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2003-11-06 | Bennett Levitan S | Method and system for managing a portfolio |
US20030225687A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2003-12-04 | David Lawrence | Travel related risk management clearinghouse |
US6662195B1 (en) | 2000-01-21 | 2003-12-09 | Microstrategy, Inc. | System and method for information warehousing supporting the automatic, real-time delivery of personalized informational and transactional data to users via content delivery device |
US6666769B2 (en) | 1999-04-30 | 2003-12-23 | Futuristic Entertainment, Inc. | Multimedia wagering system |
US20030236738A1 (en) | 1999-07-21 | 2003-12-25 | Jeffrey Lange | Replicated derivatives having demand-based, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor |
US20030236742A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2003-12-25 | David Lawrence | Hedge fund risk management |
US6671715B1 (en) | 2000-01-21 | 2003-12-30 | Microstrategy, Inc. | System and method for automatic, real-time delivery of personalized informational and transactional data to users via high throughput content delivery device |
US20040006532A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-01-08 | David Lawrence | Network access risk management |
US20040006528A1 (en) | 2002-06-20 | 2004-01-08 | Kevin Fung Ka Shun | Method and system for improving the liquidity of transactions for PM pools and auctions |
US20040006533A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-01-08 | David Lawrence | Systems and methods for managing risk associated with a geo-political area |
US20040019557A1 (en) | 2002-07-29 | 2004-01-29 | Howard Yaruss | Method and apparatus for protecting a lender having an interest in a property against a loss |
US20040024694A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-02-05 | David Lawrence | Biometric risk management |
US20040024693A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-02-05 | David Lawrence | Proprietary risk management clearinghouse |
US20040044617A1 (en) | 2002-09-03 | 2004-03-04 | Duojia Lu | Methods and systems for enterprise risk auditing and management |
WO2004021120A2 (en) | 2002-08-29 | 2004-03-11 | Steeds Company, Inc. | Method and system for offering short term derivative instruments |
US20040048656A1 (en) | 2002-07-30 | 2004-03-11 | Joseph Krynicky | System and method for pari-mutuel wagering on sporting events |
US20040059627A1 (en) | 2000-03-24 | 2004-03-25 | Robert Baseman | Method for integrated supply chain and financial management |
US20040064402A1 (en) | 2002-09-27 | 2004-04-01 | Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. | Method of refinancing a mortgage loan and a closing package for same |
US6717943B1 (en) | 1999-06-03 | 2004-04-06 | David Schwering | System and method for routing and processing data packets |
US20040073505A1 (en) | 2002-10-09 | 2004-04-15 | James Foley Wright | Method for performing monte carlo risk analysis of business scenarios |
US6722980B2 (en) | 1999-04-30 | 2004-04-20 | Asip Holdings Inc | Wagering system |
US20040078321A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-04-22 | David Lawrence | Risk management customer registry |
US20040083165A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-04-29 | David Lawrence | Construction industry risk management clearinghouse |
US20040083158A1 (en) | 2002-10-09 | 2004-04-29 | Mark Addison | Systems and methods for distributing pricing data for complex derivative securities |
US6738738B2 (en) | 2000-12-23 | 2004-05-18 | Tellme Networks, Inc. | Automated transformation from American English to British English |
US6741980B1 (en) | 1999-03-23 | 2004-05-25 | Microstrategy Inc. | System and method for automatic, real-time delivery of personalized informational and transactional data to users via content delivery device |
US20040103003A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-05-27 | E-Comm Connect, Llc | Method and system for insuring users of electronic trading systems or exchanges and traditional established commodity exchanges against weather-related risks and hazards |
US20040103058A1 (en) | 2002-08-30 | 2004-05-27 | Ken Hamilton | Decision analysis system and method |
US20040111358A1 (en) | 1999-07-21 | 2004-06-10 | Jeffrey Lange | Enhanced parimutuel wagering |
US20040109031A1 (en) | 2001-05-11 | 2004-06-10 | Kenneth Deaton | Method and system for automatically creating and displaying a customizable three-dimensional graphical user interface (3D GUI) for a computer system |
US6751606B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2004-06-15 | Microsoft Corporation | System for enhancing a query interface |
US6754639B2 (en) | 1992-06-10 | 2004-06-22 | Cfph, Llc | Fixed income portfolio index processor |
US20040133508A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-07-08 | David Lawrence | Gaming industry risk management clearinghouse |
US20040133502A1 (en) | 2000-08-17 | 2004-07-08 | Mamoud Sadre | Financial instruments, derived from root products, are used as tools for risk management in manufacturing business |
US20040148243A1 (en) | 2003-01-28 | 2004-07-29 | Rosenblatt Michael Maruin | System and method for non-linear negotiation |
WO2004068286A2 (en) | 2003-01-25 | 2004-08-12 | Mukunya Alfred K | System for trading and hedging product and brand sales |
WO2004075028A2 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2004-09-02 | Jerry Chen | Systems and methods for variable rebate and incentive programs |
US20040204232A1 (en) | 2003-04-10 | 2004-10-14 | Asher Joseph M. | Real-time interactive wagering on event outcomes |
US20040210507A1 (en) | 2003-04-02 | 2004-10-21 | Cantor Index Llc | System and method for wagering-based transferable financial instruments |
US20040215551A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2004-10-28 | Eder Jeff S. | Value and risk management system for multi-enterprise organization |
US20040230521A1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2004-11-18 | Broadbent David F. | Method and apparatus for worker compensation and task performance reporting in a mortgage loan transaction system |
US20040235542A1 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2004-11-25 | Andrew Stronach | Pari-mutuel terminal wagering system and process |
US20040236659A1 (en) | 1999-12-01 | 2004-11-25 | Cazalet Edward G. | Method and apparatus for an engine system supporting transactions, schedules and settlements involving fungible, ephemeral commodities including electrical power |
US20040236676A1 (en) | 2003-03-14 | 2004-11-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Disaster risk assessment system, disaster risk assessment support method, disaster risk assessment service providing system, disaster risk assessment method, and disaster risk assessment service providing method |
US6836537B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2004-12-28 | Microstrategy Incorporated | System and method for real-time, personalized, dynamic, interactive voice services for information related to existing travel schedule |
US20040267660A1 (en) | 2003-02-21 | 2004-12-30 | Automated Financial Systems, Inc. | Risk management system |
US20050004862A1 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2005-01-06 | Dale Kirkland | Identifying the probability of violative behavior in a market |
US6850907B2 (en) | 1996-12-13 | 2005-02-01 | Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. | Automated price improvement protocol processor |
US20050027645A1 (en) | 2002-01-31 | 2005-02-03 | Wai Shing Lui William | Business enterprise risk model and method |
US20050027649A1 (en) | 2003-02-27 | 2005-02-03 | Richard Cech | Event typer |
US20050027643A1 (en) | 2003-04-02 | 2005-02-03 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for wagering based on the movement of financial markets |
US6856973B1 (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2005-02-15 | General Electric Capital Corporation | Methods and systems for assessing creditworthiness of a country |
US20050043078A1 (en) | 2003-08-22 | 2005-02-24 | Sundstrom Stephen J. | Game based upon fluctuations of an objective environment |
US20050044037A1 (en) | 2001-01-30 | 2005-02-24 | David Lawrence | Systems and methods for automated political risk management |
US20050044029A1 (en) | 2003-04-11 | 2005-02-24 | Babcock & Brown Lp, A Delaware Limited Partnership | Hybrid securities having protection against event risk using uncorrelated last-to-default baskets |
US20050049956A1 (en) | 2003-09-02 | 2005-03-03 | Glenn Ballman | A System for Securities Exchange with Price Instability Alerts that are triggered when a security moves outside "pre-set"and/or Dynamically Calculated trading Price Ranges Over a Network |
US20050049962A1 (en) | 2003-06-04 | 2005-03-03 | Porter Keith Alan | Method, computer program product, and system for risk management |
US20050055306A1 (en) | 1998-09-22 | 2005-03-10 | Science Applications International Corporation | User-defined dynamic collaborative environments |
US20050055308A1 (en) | 2000-07-19 | 2005-03-10 | Meyer Mark Gregory | Global asset risk management system and methods |
US20050075963A1 (en) | 2002-12-09 | 2005-04-07 | Sam Balabon | System and method for execution delayed trading |
US20050080702A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2005-04-14 | Manoj Modi | System and method of compiling real property information from a central database |
US20050086143A1 (en) | 2003-10-21 | 2005-04-21 | Vlazny Kenneth A. | Methods of pari-mutuel wagering based upon fixed odds and/or share purchase |
US20050096124A1 (en) | 2003-01-21 | 2005-05-05 | Asip Holdings, Inc. | Parimutuel wagering system with opaque transactions |
US20050108148A1 (en) | 2003-11-17 | 2005-05-19 | Charles Carlson | System and method of investing in a market |
US6904412B1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2005-06-07 | Everbank | Method and apparatus for a mortgage loan originator compliance engine |
WO2005057339A2 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2005-06-23 | United Tote Company | Methods and systems for presenting pari-mutuel betting options and constructing wagers |
US20050144114A1 (en) | 2000-09-30 | 2005-06-30 | Ruggieri Thomas P. | System and method for providing global information on risks and related hedging strategies |
US20050139661A1 (en) | 2002-02-27 | 2005-06-30 | Digonex Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic pricing system with graphical user interface |
US20050149458A1 (en) | 2002-02-27 | 2005-07-07 | Digonex Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic pricing system with graphical user interface |
US20050171878A1 (en) | 2004-02-03 | 2005-08-04 | Pennock David M. | Dynamic pari-mutuel market |
US20050176499A1 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2005-08-11 | Asip Holdings, Inc. | Parimutual progressive pool controller |
US20050176495A1 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2005-08-11 | Asip Holdings, Inc. | Summary of quick pick odd/payoff stabilizer |
US20050182704A1 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-18 | Om Technology Ab | Multi site solution for securities trading |
US20050187850A1 (en) | 2004-02-25 | 2005-08-25 | Stuart Horowitz | Method for efficient investment and distribution of assets |
US20050187020A1 (en) | 2004-02-25 | 2005-08-25 | Amaitis Lee M. | System and method for convenience gaming |
US20050197190A1 (en) | 2004-02-25 | 2005-09-08 | Amaitis Lee M. | System and method for convenience gaming |
US20050202873A1 (en) | 2004-03-10 | 2005-09-15 | Asher Joseph M. | System and method for high-speed pari-mutuel wagering |
US20050245305A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-03 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for pari-mutuel gaming based on sporting event results |
US20050245308A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-03 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for wagering based on financial market indicators |
US20050245306A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-03 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for mapping results from sporting events to game inputs |
US20050245310A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-03 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for wagering based on multiple financial market indicators |
US6963853B1 (en) | 2000-08-09 | 2005-11-08 | User-Centric Enterprises, Inc. | Method and apparatus for calculating a return on investment for weather-related risk management |
US20050267836A1 (en) | 1996-03-25 | 2005-12-01 | Cfph, Llc | Method and system for transacting with a trading application |
US20050288081A1 (en) | 2004-06-28 | 2005-12-29 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for gaming based upon intermediate points in a race event |
US7006991B2 (en) | 1996-03-25 | 2006-02-28 | Cfph, Llc | Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function |
US20060085286A1 (en) | 2001-08-28 | 2006-04-20 | Cfph, L.L.C. | Systems and methods for providing interactive assistance on purchase decision-making |
US20060085310A1 (en) | 2004-10-14 | 2006-04-20 | Cfph Llc | System and method for facilitating a wireless financial transaction |
USD519570S1 (en) | 2004-09-14 | 2006-04-25 | Cfph, Llc | Graphic user interface for wagering based on multiple financial market indicators |
US20060100951A1 (en) | 2004-11-08 | 2006-05-11 | Cfph Llc | System and method for implementing push technology in a wireless financial transaction |
US20060105839A1 (en) | 2004-11-15 | 2006-05-18 | Delta Rangers, Inc. | Casino game based on financial market activity |
US20060111951A1 (en) | 2004-11-19 | 2006-05-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Time polynomial arrow-debreu market equilibrium |
US7069232B1 (en) | 1996-01-18 | 2006-06-27 | Planalytics, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for short-range weather adapted, business forecasting |
US20060173774A1 (en) | 2005-02-01 | 2006-08-03 | Frankel Oliver L | Systems and methods for improving auction liquidity |
US20060199631A1 (en) | 2004-11-15 | 2006-09-07 | Mcgill Bradley J | Casino games based on financial market activity |
WO2006099382A2 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2006-09-21 | United Tote Company | Determining scores, winners, and prizes in a contest activity |
US20060240891A1 (en) | 2005-04-11 | 2006-10-26 | Klinkhammer Keith A | Marketing system and method for customer specific promotions |
WO2006115534A2 (en) | 2005-04-22 | 2006-11-02 | Harry B Platis | Pari-mutuel wagering on large entrant pools system and method |
US20060265313A1 (en) | 2005-05-17 | 2006-11-23 | Fung Kevin K | Trading bids with bounded odds by auction |
US20060264253A1 (en) | 2005-03-21 | 2006-11-23 | Trobia Andrew G | Wagering game with diagnostic graphical user interface |
US20060271475A1 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2006-11-30 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | System and method for group positioning of market information in a graphical user interface |
US7144011B2 (en) | 2004-10-12 | 2006-12-05 | Cantor Index Llc | System and method for providing a blackjack game having additional options for a player |
WO2006130624A2 (en) | 2005-06-01 | 2006-12-07 | Mahaffey Clayton R | Methods and systems for betting with pari-mutuel payouts |
US20070005481A1 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2007-01-04 | Vijay Kedia | Real time graphical user interface for on-line trading |
US20070011619A1 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2007-01-11 | Bay-Wei Chang | Method, system, and graphical user interface for dynamically updating transmission characteristics in a web mail reply |
WO2007008597A2 (en) | 2005-07-08 | 2007-01-18 | Cfph, Llc | System for wireless gaming with user profiles |
US20070016861A1 (en) | 2005-07-15 | 2007-01-18 | Nokia Corporation | Apparatus and methods for implementing modular, context-aware active graphical user interface objects |
WO2007008601A2 (en) | 2005-07-08 | 2007-01-18 | Cfph, Llc | System for peer-to-peer wireless gaming |
WO2007008713A2 (en) | 2005-07-08 | 2007-01-18 | Cfph, Llc | System for providing wireless gaming as a service application |
US20070021165A1 (en) | 2005-07-21 | 2007-01-25 | Ma Jeffrey K | Graphical user interface for a fantasy sports application |
WO2007015921A2 (en) | 2005-07-26 | 2007-02-08 | Cantor Index Llc | System and method for conducting a jackpot race event |
WO2007024605A2 (en) | 2005-08-19 | 2007-03-01 | Mark Benrus | Method of pari-mutuel wagering in real time |
WO2007033198A2 (en) | 2005-09-13 | 2007-03-22 | Magna Entertainment Corp. | Methods and systems for conducting pari-mutuel wagers |
US20070083458A1 (en) | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-12 | Rosenthal Collins Group, L.L.C. | Method and system for providing a graphical user interface and trading system for professional electronic trading |
US20070185653A1 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2007-08-09 | Bresch David N | Method and system for automated location dependent probabilistic tropical cyclone forecast |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20030093565A (en) * | 2002-06-03 | 2003-12-11 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Packet estimation method in wireless data telecommunication |
-
2007
- 2007-09-14 US US11/901,050 patent/US7584134B2/en active Active - Reinstated
-
2009
- 2009-07-31 US US12/462,289 patent/US7917420B2/en active Active - Reinstated
Patent Citations (323)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3573747A (en) | 1969-02-24 | 1971-04-06 | Institutional Networks Corp | Instinet communication system for effectuating the sale or exchange of fungible properties between subscribers |
US3874584A (en) | 1971-08-31 | 1975-04-01 | Terence Patrick Grattan Foley | Forecasting apparatus |
US4566066A (en) | 1972-08-11 | 1986-01-21 | Towers Frederic C | Securities valuation system |
US4334270A (en) | 1972-08-11 | 1982-06-08 | Towers Frederic C | Securities valuation system |
US4412287A (en) | 1975-05-29 | 1983-10-25 | Braddock Iii Walter D | Automated stock exchange |
US4235001A (en) | 1975-09-17 | 1980-11-25 | Haruhiro Matino | Gas display panel fabrication method |
US4323770A (en) | 1978-08-16 | 1982-04-06 | Societe D'etude De Systems Avances Et D'amenagements | Unit particularly for taking stakes and possibly determining the winners in a game such as a national lotto game |
US4346442A (en) | 1980-07-29 | 1982-08-24 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated | Securities brokerage-cash management system |
US4376978A (en) | 1980-07-29 | 1983-03-15 | Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith | Securities brokerage-cash management system |
US4554418A (en) | 1983-05-16 | 1985-11-19 | Toy Frank C | Information monitoring and notification method and apparatus |
US4903201A (en) | 1983-11-03 | 1990-02-20 | World Energy Exchange Corporation | Automated futures trading exchange |
US4980826A (en) | 1983-11-03 | 1990-12-25 | World Energy Exchange Corporation | Voice actuated automated futures trading exchange |
US4722055A (en) | 1984-03-08 | 1988-01-26 | College Savings Bank | Methods and apparatus for funding future liability of uncertain cost |
US4752877A (en) | 1984-03-08 | 1988-06-21 | College Savings Bank | Method and apparatus for funding a future liability of uncertain cost |
US4751640A (en) | 1984-06-14 | 1988-06-14 | Citibank, Na | Automated investment system |
US4739478A (en) | 1984-11-21 | 1988-04-19 | Lazard Freres & Co. | Methods and apparatus for restructuring debt obligations |
US4674044A (en) | 1985-01-30 | 1987-06-16 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. | Automated securities trading system |
US4766539A (en) | 1985-03-08 | 1988-08-23 | Fox Henry L | Method of determining the premium for and writing a policy insuring against specified weather conditions |
US4831526A (en) | 1986-04-22 | 1989-05-16 | The Chubb Corporation | Computerized insurance premium quote request and policy issuance system |
US4823264A (en) | 1986-05-27 | 1989-04-18 | Deming Gilbert R | Electronic funds transfer system |
US4842278A (en) | 1986-06-02 | 1989-06-27 | Victor Markowicz | Hierarchical lottery network with selection from differentiated playing pools |
US4839804A (en) | 1986-12-30 | 1989-06-13 | College Savings Bank | Method and apparatus for insuring the funding of a future liability of uncertain cost |
US5911136A (en) | 1987-04-15 | 1999-06-08 | Proprietary Financial Products, Inc. | System for prioritized operation of a personal financial account comprising liabilities and investment assets |
US4953085A (en) | 1987-04-15 | 1990-08-28 | Proprietary Financial Products, Inc. | System for the operation of a financial account |
US4823265A (en) | 1987-05-11 | 1989-04-18 | Nelson George E | Renewable option accounting and marketing system |
US4933842A (en) | 1988-02-29 | 1990-06-12 | Tesseract Corporation | Automated investment fund accounting system |
US4975840A (en) | 1988-06-17 | 1990-12-04 | Lincoln National Risk Management, Inc. | Method and apparatus for evaluating a potentially insurable risk |
US5077665A (en) | 1989-05-25 | 1991-12-31 | Reuters Limited | Distributed matching system |
US5136501A (en) | 1989-05-26 | 1992-08-04 | Reuters Limited | Anonymous matching system |
US5101353A (en) | 1989-05-31 | 1992-03-31 | Lattice Investments, Inc. | Automated system for providing liquidity to securities markets |
US6336103B1 (en) | 1989-08-02 | 2002-01-01 | Nardin L. Baker | Rapid method of analysis for correlation of asset return to future financial liabilities |
US5148365A (en) | 1989-08-15 | 1992-09-15 | Dembo Ron S | Scenario optimization |
US5126936A (en) | 1989-09-01 | 1992-06-30 | Champion Securities | Goal-directed financial asset management system |
US5712985A (en) | 1989-09-12 | 1998-01-27 | Lee; Michael D. | System and method for estimating business demand based on business influences |
US5220500A (en) | 1989-09-19 | 1993-06-15 | Batterymarch Investment System | Financial management system |
US5608620A (en) | 1990-03-19 | 1997-03-04 | Lundgren; Carl A. | Method of eliciting unbiased forecasts by relating a forecaster's pay to the forecaster's contribution to a collective forecast |
US5689649A (en) | 1991-03-01 | 1997-11-18 | Altman; Robert | System for operation of a combination mortgage, equity load and savings plan |
US5802500A (en) | 1992-05-06 | 1998-09-01 | The Evergreen Group Incorporated | System and method for computing a financial projection of a prefunding program for other postretirement employee benefits under FASB statement 106 |
US20030023546A1 (en) | 1992-05-29 | 2003-01-30 | Shepherd Ian Kenneth | Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of risk management contracts |
US6912510B1 (en) | 1992-05-29 | 2005-06-28 | Alice Corporation Pty Ltd | Methods of exchanging an obligation |
US6134536A (en) | 1992-05-29 | 2000-10-17 | Swychco Infrastructure Services Pty Ltd. | Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of risk management contracts |
US5970479A (en) | 1992-05-29 | 1999-10-19 | Swychco Infrastructure Services Pty. Ltd. | Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of risk management contracts |
US20030191707A1 (en) | 1992-05-29 | 2003-10-09 | Shepherd Ian Kenneth | Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of risk management contracts |
US5444819A (en) | 1992-06-08 | 1995-08-22 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Economic phenomenon predicting and analyzing system using neural network |
US6754639B2 (en) | 1992-06-10 | 2004-06-22 | Cfph, Llc | Fixed income portfolio index processor |
US5275400A (en) | 1992-06-11 | 1994-01-04 | Gary Weingardt | Pari-mutuel electronic gaming |
US5671363A (en) | 1992-09-01 | 1997-09-23 | Merril Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. | Private stock option account control and exercise system |
US20020046144A1 (en) | 1992-10-28 | 2002-04-18 | Graff Richard A. | Further improved system and methods for computing to support decomposing property into separately valued components |
WO1994018640A1 (en) | 1993-02-10 | 1994-08-18 | Turk James J | Method and system for commodity-based currency for payment of accounts |
US5665952A (en) | 1993-09-07 | 1997-09-09 | Ziarno; Witold A. | Method of streamlining the acknowledgement of a multiplicity of contribution or gift commitments made at a plurality of remote locations to distinct fund-raising organizations and gift recipients and system therefor |
US5796932A (en) * | 1994-01-14 | 1998-08-18 | Strategic Weather Services | User interface for graphically displaying the impact of weather on managerial planning |
WO1995019614A2 (en) | 1994-01-18 | 1995-07-20 | Mohanrao Mukkamala V | Central bank's issue of new or created money to fund federal budget deficits, programs and projects using engineering judgment |
WO1995022883A2 (en) | 1994-02-24 | 1995-08-31 | Grantley Thomas Aubrey Hall | Specified return determinator |
US5873782A (en) | 1994-02-24 | 1999-02-23 | Hall; Grantley Thomas Aubrey | Specified return determinator |
US5491629A (en) | 1994-03-04 | 1996-02-13 | Strategic Weather Services | System and method for determining the impact of weather and other factors on managerial planning applications |
WO1995026005A1 (en) | 1994-03-23 | 1995-09-28 | Belzberg Sydney H | Computerized stock exchange trading system |
EP0752135B1 (en) | 1994-03-23 | 1999-02-03 | Sydney H. Belzberg | Computerized stock exchange trading system |
US5749785A (en) | 1994-09-21 | 1998-05-12 | Rossides; Michael T. | Communications system using bets |
US5696366A (en) | 1994-10-05 | 1997-12-09 | Ziarno; Witold A. | Method for streamlining the giving of contribution and gift commitments |
US5663547A (en) | 1994-10-05 | 1997-09-02 | Ziarno; Witold A. | Method of fund-raising with a keyless contribution and gift commitment management device |
EP1345145A2 (en) | 1994-10-13 | 2003-09-17 | World Trade Centers Association, Inc. | Full service trade system |
EP0789884B1 (en) | 1994-10-13 | 2003-09-03 | World Trade Centers Association, Inc. | Full service trade system |
WO1996012242A1 (en) | 1994-10-13 | 1996-04-25 | World Trade Centers Association, Inc. | Full service trade system |
US5717989A (en) | 1994-10-13 | 1998-02-10 | Full Service Trade System Ltd. | Full service trade system |
US6151588A (en) | 1994-10-13 | 2000-11-21 | Tradecard, Inc. | Full service trade system |
US5568378A (en) | 1994-10-24 | 1996-10-22 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Variable horizon predictor for controlling dead time dominant processes, multivariable interactive processes, and processes with time variant dynamics |
US5519605A (en) | 1994-10-24 | 1996-05-21 | Olin Corporation | Model predictive control apparatus and method |
US5732400A (en) | 1995-01-04 | 1998-03-24 | Citibank N.A. | System and method for a risk-based purchase of goods |
WO1996021192A1 (en) | 1995-01-04 | 1996-07-11 | Citibank, N.A. | System and method for electronic sale of goods |
US5689650A (en) | 1995-02-23 | 1997-11-18 | Mcclelland; Glenn B. | Community reinvestment act network |
US5926800A (en) | 1995-04-24 | 1999-07-20 | Minerva, L.P. | System and method for providing a line of credit secured by an assignment of a life insurance policy |
US5689799A (en) | 1995-04-26 | 1997-11-18 | Wink Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for routing confidential information |
US6363525B1 (en) | 1995-04-26 | 2002-03-26 | Wink Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for routing confidential information |
US5878141A (en) | 1995-08-25 | 1999-03-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Computerized purchasing system and method for mediating purchase transactions over an interactive network |
US6554708B1 (en) | 1995-09-08 | 2003-04-29 | Ods Properties, Inc. | Interactive wagering systems and processes |
US5830068A (en) | 1995-09-08 | 1998-11-03 | Ods Technologies, L.P. | Interactive wagering systems and processes |
US6089981A (en) | 1995-09-08 | 2000-07-18 | Ods Technologies, L.P. | Interactive wagering systems and processes |
US6554709B1 (en) | 1995-09-08 | 2003-04-29 | Ods Properties, Inc. | Interactive wagering systems and processes |
US6099409A (en) | 1995-09-08 | 2000-08-08 | Ods Technologies, L.P. | Interactive wagering systems and processes |
US5806048A (en) | 1995-10-12 | 1998-09-08 | Mopex, Inc. | Open end mutual fund securitization process |
US5953707A (en) | 1995-10-26 | 1999-09-14 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | Decision support system for the management of an agile supply chain |
EP0770967A2 (en) | 1995-10-26 | 1997-05-02 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Decision support system for the management of an agile supply chain |
US5845266A (en) | 1995-12-12 | 1998-12-01 | Optimark Technologies, Inc. | Crossing network utilizing satisfaction density profile with price discovery features |
US6088686A (en) | 1995-12-12 | 2000-07-11 | Citibank, N.A. | System and method to performing on-line credit reviews and approvals |
WO1997022073A1 (en) | 1995-12-12 | 1997-06-19 | Citibank, N.A. | System and method for performing on-line reviews and approvals of credit and liability applications |
US7069232B1 (en) | 1996-01-18 | 2006-06-27 | Planalytics, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for short-range weather adapted, business forecasting |
US5832456A (en) | 1996-01-18 | 1998-11-03 | Strategic Weather Services | System and method for weather adapted, business performance forecasting |
US5745383A (en) | 1996-02-15 | 1998-04-28 | Barber; Timothy P. | Method and apparatus for efficient threshold inference |
US7006991B2 (en) | 1996-03-25 | 2006-02-28 | Cfph, Llc | Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function |
US20050267836A1 (en) | 1996-03-25 | 2005-12-01 | Cfph, Llc | Method and system for transacting with a trading application |
NL1002790C1 (en) | 1996-04-04 | 1997-05-13 | Pieter Van Der Kuur | Financial instrument based on forecasts of races, opinion poll results, etc. - allows buyers and sellers of opinions to invest fixed sums with predictable winning amounts |
US6224486B1 (en) | 1996-04-22 | 2001-05-01 | Walker Digital, Llc | Database driven online distributed tournament system |
US5848396A (en) | 1996-04-26 | 1998-12-08 | Freedom Of Information, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining behavioral profile of a computer user |
US5991735A (en) | 1996-04-26 | 1999-11-23 | Be Free, Inc. | Computer program apparatus for determining behavioral profile of a computer user |
US5946666A (en) | 1996-05-21 | 1999-08-31 | Albert Einstein Healthcare Network | Monitoring device for financial securities |
US5987433A (en) | 1996-06-03 | 1999-11-16 | General Electric Company | Method and system for developing a time horizon based investment strategy |
US20030120426A1 (en) * | 1996-06-04 | 2003-06-26 | Baron Services, Inc. | Systems and methods for distributing real-time site-specific weather information |
US5794207A (en) | 1996-09-04 | 1998-08-11 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers |
US5830069A (en) | 1996-09-13 | 1998-11-03 | Wango World Inc. | Wide area networking gaming |
WO1998013776A1 (en) | 1996-09-24 | 1998-04-02 | Rco Software Limited | Computer aided risk management in multiple-parameter physical systems |
US6560580B1 (en) | 1996-12-13 | 2003-05-06 | Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. (Cflp) | Automated auction protocol processor |
US6850907B2 (en) | 1996-12-13 | 2005-02-01 | Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. | Automated price improvement protocol processor |
US20050160032A1 (en) | 1996-12-13 | 2005-07-21 | Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. | Automated price improvement protocol processor |
US5819238A (en) | 1996-12-13 | 1998-10-06 | Enhanced Investment Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and accompanying methods for automatically modifying a financial portfolio through dynamic re-weighting based on a non-constant function of current capitalization weights |
US6317726B1 (en) | 1996-12-30 | 2001-11-13 | Netfolio, Inc. | Automated strategies for investment management |
US6167378A (en) | 1997-01-21 | 2000-12-26 | Webber, Jr.; Donald Gary | Automated back office transaction method and system |
US6078901A (en) | 1997-04-03 | 2000-06-20 | Ching; Hugh | Quantitative supply and demand model based on infinite spreadsheet |
US5855514A (en) | 1997-05-16 | 1999-01-05 | Stuart J. Kamille | Probability game with insured winning |
US5931467A (en) | 1997-05-16 | 1999-08-03 | Stuart J. Kamille | Probability game |
US20020046137A1 (en) | 1997-07-11 | 2002-04-18 | Bid/Ask, L.L.C. | Method for computerized wagering |
US6026364A (en) | 1997-07-28 | 2000-02-15 | Whitworth; Brian L. | System and method for replacing a liability with insurance and for analyzing data and generating documents pertaining to a premium financing mechanism paying for such insurance |
WO1999009500A3 (en) | 1997-08-01 | 1999-04-29 | Realkredit Danmark As | Method and data system for determining financial instruments for use in the funding of a loan |
US6315666B1 (en) | 1997-08-08 | 2001-11-13 | International Game Technology | Gaming machines having secondary display for providing video content |
US6368216B1 (en) | 1997-08-08 | 2002-04-09 | International Game Technology | Gaming machine having secondary display for providing video content |
US6135884A (en) | 1997-08-08 | 2000-10-24 | International Game Technology | Gaming machine having secondary display for providing video content |
WO1999010815A1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 1999-03-04 | Grenex Corporation | Exchange method and apparatus |
US6105005A (en) | 1997-09-15 | 2000-08-15 | Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. | System for enhanced financial trading support |
US6085174A (en) | 1997-09-23 | 2000-07-04 | Edelman; Ric | Computer assisted and/or implemented process and architecture for administering an investment and/or retirement program |
US6015345A (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2000-01-18 | Supra Engineering Limited | Conducting games of chance using predicted sum of scores |
US20020138390A1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2002-09-26 | R. Raymond May | Systems, methods and computer program products for subject-based addressing in an electronic trading system |
US6421653B1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2002-07-16 | Blackbird Holdings, Inc. | Systems, methods and computer program products for electronic trading of financial instruments |
WO1999019821A1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 1999-04-22 | Derivatives Net, Inc. | Systems, methods and computer program products for electronic trading of financial instruments |
US6317727B1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2001-11-13 | Blackbird Holdings, Inc. | Systems, methods and computer program products for monitoring credit risks in electronic trading systems |
US20010014875A1 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 2001-08-16 | Andrew R. Young | Computer method and apparatus for optimizing portfolios of multiple participants |
WO1999023592A1 (en) | 1997-10-31 | 1999-05-14 | Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. | Computer method and apparatus for optimizing portfolios of multiple participants |
WO1999024928B1 (en) | 1997-11-06 | 1999-12-09 | Intertrust Tech Corp | Systems and methods for matching, selecting, narrowcasting, and/or classifying based on rights management and/or other information |
US6024641A (en) | 1997-11-19 | 2000-02-15 | Sarno; Robert A. | Method, apparatus and system for lottery gaming |
WO1999030261A1 (en) | 1997-12-10 | 1999-06-17 | Financial Engines, Inc. | User interface for a financial advisory system |
WO1999031613A1 (en) | 1997-12-17 | 1999-06-24 | Omega Consulting, Inc. | A method and apparatus for bundled asset trading |
US6269101B1 (en) | 1997-12-31 | 2001-07-31 | At&T Corporation | Network server platform for a hybrid fiber twisted pair local loop network service architecture |
US6229810B1 (en) | 1997-12-31 | 2001-05-08 | At&T Corp | Network server platform for a hybrid fiber twisted pair local loop network service architecture |
US6064985A (en) | 1998-01-21 | 2000-05-16 | Assured Equities, Inc. | Automated portfolio management system with internet datafeed |
WO1999046720A1 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 1999-09-16 | Cha Technologies Services, Inc. | Automatically invoked intermediation process for network purchases |
US6405179B1 (en) | 1998-03-16 | 2002-06-11 | Saddle Peak Systems | System and method for data collection, evaluation, information generation, and presentation |
US6078904A (en) | 1998-03-16 | 2000-06-20 | Saddle Peak Systems | Risk direct asset allocation and risk resolved CAPM for optimally allocating investment assets in an investment portfolio |
US6370516B1 (en) | 1998-03-16 | 2002-04-09 | John P Reese | Computer based device to report the results of codified methodologies of financial advisors applied to a single security or element |
US6078905A (en) | 1998-03-27 | 2000-06-20 | Pich-Lewinter; Eva | Method for optimizing risk management |
WO1999056232A1 (en) | 1998-04-27 | 1999-11-04 | Omega Consulting, Inc. | Apparatus and method for trading of bundled assets |
US6085175A (en) | 1998-07-02 | 2000-07-04 | Axiom Software Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for determining value at risk of a financial portfolio |
US6330551B1 (en) | 1998-08-06 | 2001-12-11 | Cybersettle.Com, Inc. | Computerized dispute resolution system and method |
WO2000011570A1 (en) | 1998-08-25 | 2000-03-02 | Accompany Inc. | On-line marketing system and method |
US6269343B1 (en) | 1998-08-25 | 2001-07-31 | Mobshop, Inc. | On-line marketing system and method |
US6430542B1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2002-08-06 | American Express Financial Corporation | Computer-implemented program for financial planning and advice system |
US6292787B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2001-09-18 | Financial Engines, Inc. | Enhancing utility and diversifying model risk in a portfolio optimization framework |
WO2000017795A1 (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2000-03-30 | I2 Technologies, Inc. | System and method for managing atp data in a distributed supply chain planning environment |
US20050055306A1 (en) | 1998-09-22 | 2005-03-10 | Science Applications International Corporation | User-defined dynamic collaborative environments |
WO2000021013A1 (en) | 1998-10-06 | 2000-04-13 | Andrew Lustig | Method and apparatus for auctions with automatic matching |
US20020032644A1 (en) | 1998-10-08 | 2002-03-14 | Corby Paul M. | System, method, and computer program product for valuating wather-based financial instruments |
US6336105B1 (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2002-01-01 | Trade Access Inc. | System and method for representing data and providing electronic non-repudiation in a negotiations system |
WO2000029923A2 (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2000-05-25 | Trade Access, Inc | Sponsored community system and method |
WO2000029973A1 (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2000-05-25 | Trade Access, Inc. | Electronic non-repudiation system and method |
US6527172B1 (en) | 1998-11-25 | 2003-03-04 | Diebold, Incorporated | Automated banking machine enclosure |
US6236972B1 (en) | 1998-12-02 | 2001-05-22 | Gary Shkedy | Method and apparatus for facilitating transactions on a commercial network system |
US6751606B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2004-06-15 | Microsoft Corporation | System for enhancing a query interface |
US6513031B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2003-01-28 | Microsoft Corporation | System for improving search area selection |
US6460029B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2002-10-01 | Microsoft Corporation | System for improving search text |
US6601059B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2003-07-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Computerized searching tool with spell checking |
US6319122B1 (en) | 1998-12-31 | 2001-11-20 | Walker Digital, Llc | Electronic amusement device and method for providing payouts based on the activity of other devices |
US6236977B1 (en) | 1999-01-04 | 2001-05-22 | Realty One, Inc. | Computer implemented marketing system |
US6278983B1 (en) | 1999-01-11 | 2001-08-21 | Owen Edward Ball | Automated resource allocation and management system |
US6625582B2 (en) | 1999-03-12 | 2003-09-23 | Richman/Singer Venture | Method and system for converting a designated portion of future social security and other retirement payments to current benefits |
US20020161681A1 (en) | 1999-03-12 | 2002-10-31 | Richard Paul Richman | Method and system for converting a designated portion of future social security and other retirement payments to current benefits |
US20010044767A1 (en) | 1999-03-19 | 2001-11-22 | Primex Holdings Llc | Auction market with price improvement mechanism |
US6741980B1 (en) | 1999-03-23 | 2004-05-25 | Microstrategy Inc. | System and method for automatic, real-time delivery of personalized informational and transactional data to users via content delivery device |
WO2000058858A1 (en) | 1999-03-29 | 2000-10-05 | Elik Szewach | Gaming systems and methods |
US6722980B2 (en) | 1999-04-30 | 2004-04-20 | Asip Holdings Inc | Wagering system |
US6666769B2 (en) | 1999-04-30 | 2003-12-23 | Futuristic Entertainment, Inc. | Multimedia wagering system |
US6236973B1 (en) | 1999-06-02 | 2001-05-22 | Greg Dillard | Apparatus and method for providing collateral construction loan insurance coverage |
US6717943B1 (en) | 1999-06-03 | 2004-04-06 | David Schwering | System and method for routing and processing data packets |
US6415267B1 (en) | 1999-06-08 | 2002-07-02 | Bernard P Hagan | System for monitoring increasing income financial products |
US6591232B1 (en) | 1999-06-08 | 2003-07-08 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Method of selecting an optimum mix of resources to maximize an outcome while minimizing risk |
US20030236738A1 (en) | 1999-07-21 | 2003-12-25 | Jeffrey Lange | Replicated derivatives having demand-based, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor |
US6321212B1 (en) | 1999-07-21 | 2001-11-20 | Longitude, Inc. | Financial products having a demand-based, adjustable return, and trading exchange therefor |
US20020147670A1 (en) | 1999-07-21 | 2002-10-10 | Jeffrey Lange | Digital options having demand-based, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor |
US20040111358A1 (en) | 1999-07-21 | 2004-06-10 | Jeffrey Lange | Enhanced parimutuel wagering |
US6345239B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2002-02-05 | Accenture Llp | Remote demonstration of business capabilities in an e-commerce environment |
US6427132B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2002-07-30 | Accenture Llp | System, method and article of manufacture for demonstrating E-commerce capabilities via a simulation on a network |
US6375571B1 (en) | 1999-09-02 | 2002-04-23 | Sony Computer Entertaiment, Inc. | Entertainment system, entertainment apparatus, recording medium, and program |
US6836537B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2004-12-28 | Microstrategy Incorporated | System and method for real-time, personalized, dynamic, interactive voice services for information related to existing travel schedule |
US6546375B1 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2003-04-08 | Johns Hopkins University | Apparatus and method of pricing financial derivatives |
WO2001025987A1 (en) | 1999-10-04 | 2001-04-12 | James Joseph Deupree | System for hiring and engagement management of qualified professionals |
US20040236659A1 (en) | 1999-12-01 | 2004-11-25 | Cazalet Edward G. | Method and apparatus for an engine system supporting transactions, schedules and settlements involving fungible, ephemeral commodities including electrical power |
US6508710B1 (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2003-01-21 | Virtgame Corp. | Gaming system with location verification |
US20030087701A1 (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2003-05-08 | Virtgame Corp. | Gaming system with location verification |
US6856973B1 (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2005-02-15 | General Electric Capital Corporation | Methods and systems for assessing creditworthiness of a country |
US6453687B2 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2002-09-24 | Robertshaw Controls Company | Refrigeration monitor unit |
US6671715B1 (en) | 2000-01-21 | 2003-12-30 | Microstrategy, Inc. | System and method for automatic, real-time delivery of personalized informational and transactional data to users via high throughput content delivery device |
US6662195B1 (en) | 2000-01-21 | 2003-12-09 | Microstrategy, Inc. | System and method for information warehousing supporting the automatic, real-time delivery of personalized informational and transactional data to users via content delivery device |
US20060271475A1 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2006-11-30 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | System and method for group positioning of market information in a graphical user interface |
US20010021911A1 (en) | 2000-03-03 | 2001-09-13 | Hideki Ohmoto | Automatic designing apparatus and method of financial article and recording medium storing financial article automatic designing program therein |
WO2001067308A1 (en) | 2000-03-08 | 2001-09-13 | Fuerst-Shvadron | A computer system and method for providing a seller/buyer environment over a network |
US20010047326A1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2001-11-29 | Broadbent David F. | Interface system for a mortgage loan originator compliance engine |
US20040230521A1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2004-11-18 | Broadbent David F. | Method and apparatus for worker compensation and task performance reporting in a mortgage loan transaction system |
US6904412B1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2005-06-07 | Everbank | Method and apparatus for a mortgage loan originator compliance engine |
US20010037287A1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2001-11-01 | Broadbent David F. | Method and apparatus for an advanced speech recognition portal for a mortgage loan management system |
US20040059627A1 (en) | 2000-03-24 | 2004-03-25 | Robert Baseman | Method for integrated supply chain and financial management |
US20010037282A1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2001-11-01 | Hideki Yoneda | Method for trading a manufacturing capacity and manufacturing capacity trading system |
US6470321B1 (en) | 2000-04-17 | 2002-10-22 | Forthcoming Llp | System, method, and computer program product for providing financial protection of equity investments |
US20020073021A1 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2002-06-13 | Ginsberg Philip M. | Real-time interactive wagering on event outcomes |
US20030195841A1 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2003-10-16 | Cfph, L.L.C. (Cfph) | Real-time interactive wagering on event outcomes |
US20040235542A1 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2004-11-25 | Andrew Stronach | Pari-mutuel terminal wagering system and process |
US20010056396A1 (en) | 2000-06-27 | 2001-12-27 | Tadashi Goino | Auction methods, auction systems and servers |
US20050055308A1 (en) | 2000-07-19 | 2005-03-10 | Meyer Mark Gregory | Global asset risk management system and methods |
US6963853B1 (en) | 2000-08-09 | 2005-11-08 | User-Centric Enterprises, Inc. | Method and apparatus for calculating a return on investment for weather-related risk management |
US20040133502A1 (en) | 2000-08-17 | 2004-07-08 | Mamoud Sadre | Financial instruments, derived from root products, are used as tools for risk management in manufacturing business |
US20020032646A1 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2002-03-14 | Francis Sweeney | System and method of automated brokerage for risk management services and products |
US20050144114A1 (en) | 2000-09-30 | 2005-06-30 | Ruggieri Thomas P. | System and method for providing global information on risks and related hedging strategies |
US20020040339A1 (en) | 2000-10-02 | 2002-04-04 | Dhar Kuldeep K. | Automated loan processing system and method |
US20020069155A1 (en) | 2000-10-17 | 2002-06-06 | John Nafeh | Methods and apparatus for formulation, initial public or private offering, and secondary market trading of risk management contracts |
US20020130899A1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2002-09-19 | Mark Ryan | Weather information delivery systems and methods providing planning functionality and navigational tools |
US6738738B2 (en) | 2000-12-23 | 2004-05-18 | Tellme Networks, Inc. | Automated transformation from American English to British English |
US20050044037A1 (en) | 2001-01-30 | 2005-02-24 | David Lawrence | Systems and methods for automated political risk management |
US20050071266A1 (en) | 2001-02-05 | 2005-03-31 | Eder Jeff Scott | Value and risk management system |
US6527270B2 (en) | 2001-02-13 | 2003-03-04 | Casino Advisory Services, Inc. | Method of effecting multiple wagers on a sports or other event |
US20020120558A1 (en) | 2001-02-27 | 2002-08-29 | Reid William Joseph | System for managing risks by combining risk insurance policy investments with risk prevention computer-based technology investments using common measurement methods |
US20030208429A1 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2003-11-06 | Bennett Levitan S | Method and system for managing a portfolio |
US20040006532A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-01-08 | David Lawrence | Network access risk management |
US20040083165A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-04-29 | David Lawrence | Construction industry risk management clearinghouse |
US20030225687A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2003-12-04 | David Lawrence | Travel related risk management clearinghouse |
US20040078321A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-04-22 | David Lawrence | Risk management customer registry |
US20020138417A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2002-09-26 | David Lawrence | Risk management clearinghouse |
US20030126073A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2003-07-03 | David Lawrence | Charitable transaction risk management clearinghouse |
US20030236742A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2003-12-25 | David Lawrence | Hedge fund risk management |
US20040006533A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-01-08 | David Lawrence | Systems and methods for managing risk associated with a geo-political area |
US20040024693A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-02-05 | David Lawrence | Proprietary risk management clearinghouse |
US20040133508A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-07-08 | David Lawrence | Gaming industry risk management clearinghouse |
US20040024694A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2004-02-05 | David Lawrence | Biometric risk management |
US20020138413A1 (en) | 2001-03-26 | 2002-09-26 | Creamer David E. | Commercial mortgage closing process |
US20040109031A1 (en) | 2001-05-11 | 2004-06-10 | Kenneth Deaton | Method and system for automatically creating and displaying a customizable three-dimensional graphical user interface (3D GUI) for a computer system |
US20030009419A1 (en) | 2001-06-11 | 2003-01-09 | Chavez R. Martin | Risk management system and trade engine with automatic trade feed and market data feed |
US20030023534A1 (en) | 2001-06-11 | 2003-01-30 | Shubha Kadambe | Method and apparatus for determining and assessing information to be collected based on information-theoretic measures |
US20060085286A1 (en) | 2001-08-28 | 2006-04-20 | Cfph, L.L.C. | Systems and methods for providing interactive assistance on purchase decision-making |
US20030088532A1 (en) | 2001-10-11 | 2003-05-08 | Hampshire John B. | Method and apparatus for learning to classify patterns and assess the value of decisions |
US20030078869A1 (en) | 2001-10-19 | 2003-04-24 | Williams James Benjamin | Interactive control interface for evaluating and executing a strategy for controlling investment risk |
US20030177083A1 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2003-09-18 | Mont Marco Casassa | Automated negotiation agent and method of evaluating risk and trust in contract negotiation by electronic means |
US20040215551A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2004-10-28 | Eder Jeff S. | Value and risk management system for multi-enterprise organization |
US20030177087A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2003-09-18 | David Lawrence | Transaction surveillance |
US20030149657A1 (en) | 2001-12-05 | 2003-08-07 | Diane Reynolds | System and method for measuring and managing operational risk |
US20030135441A1 (en) | 2001-12-17 | 2003-07-17 | Cfph, L.L.C. | Systems and methods for durable goods futures market |
US20030126059A1 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2003-07-03 | Hensley Roy Austin | Intelectual property (IP) brokering system and method |
US20050027645A1 (en) | 2002-01-31 | 2005-02-03 | Wai Shing Lui William | Business enterprise risk model and method |
US20050149458A1 (en) | 2002-02-27 | 2005-07-07 | Digonex Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic pricing system with graphical user interface |
US20050139661A1 (en) | 2002-02-27 | 2005-06-30 | Digonex Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic pricing system with graphical user interface |
US20040006528A1 (en) | 2002-06-20 | 2004-01-08 | Kevin Fung Ka Shun | Method and system for improving the liquidity of transactions for PM pools and auctions |
US20040019557A1 (en) | 2002-07-29 | 2004-01-29 | Howard Yaruss | Method and apparatus for protecting a lender having an interest in a property against a loss |
US20040048656A1 (en) | 2002-07-30 | 2004-03-11 | Joseph Krynicky | System and method for pari-mutuel wagering on sporting events |
US20050131789A1 (en) | 2002-08-29 | 2005-06-16 | Eliezer Mintz | Method and system for offering short term derivative instruments |
WO2004021120A2 (en) | 2002-08-29 | 2004-03-11 | Steeds Company, Inc. | Method and system for offering short term derivative instruments |
US20040103058A1 (en) | 2002-08-30 | 2004-05-27 | Ken Hamilton | Decision analysis system and method |
US20040044617A1 (en) | 2002-09-03 | 2004-03-04 | Duojia Lu | Methods and systems for enterprise risk auditing and management |
US20040064402A1 (en) | 2002-09-27 | 2004-04-01 | Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. | Method of refinancing a mortgage loan and a closing package for same |
US20040167850A1 (en) | 2002-09-27 | 2004-08-26 | Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. | Method of refinancing a mortgage loan and a closing package for same |
US20040073505A1 (en) | 2002-10-09 | 2004-04-15 | James Foley Wright | Method for performing monte carlo risk analysis of business scenarios |
US20040083158A1 (en) | 2002-10-09 | 2004-04-29 | Mark Addison | Systems and methods for distributing pricing data for complex derivative securities |
US20040103003A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-05-27 | E-Comm Connect, Llc | Method and system for insuring users of electronic trading systems or exchanges and traditional established commodity exchanges against weather-related risks and hazards |
US20050075963A1 (en) | 2002-12-09 | 2005-04-07 | Sam Balabon | System and method for execution delayed trading |
US20050096124A1 (en) | 2003-01-21 | 2005-05-05 | Asip Holdings, Inc. | Parimutuel wagering system with opaque transactions |
WO2004068286A2 (en) | 2003-01-25 | 2004-08-12 | Mukunya Alfred K | System for trading and hedging product and brand sales |
US20040148243A1 (en) | 2003-01-28 | 2004-07-29 | Rosenblatt Michael Maruin | System and method for non-linear negotiation |
WO2004075028A2 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2004-09-02 | Jerry Chen | Systems and methods for variable rebate and incentive programs |
US20040267660A1 (en) | 2003-02-21 | 2004-12-30 | Automated Financial Systems, Inc. | Risk management system |
US20050027649A1 (en) | 2003-02-27 | 2005-02-03 | Richard Cech | Event typer |
US20040236676A1 (en) | 2003-03-14 | 2004-11-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Disaster risk assessment system, disaster risk assessment support method, disaster risk assessment service providing system, disaster risk assessment method, and disaster risk assessment service providing method |
US20040210507A1 (en) | 2003-04-02 | 2004-10-21 | Cantor Index Llc | System and method for wagering-based transferable financial instruments |
WO2004090662A2 (en) | 2003-04-02 | 2004-10-21 | Cantor Index Llc | System and method for wagering-based transferable financial instruments |
US7233922B2 (en) | 2003-04-02 | 2007-06-19 | Cantor Index Llc | System and method for wagering-based transferable financial instruments |
US20050027643A1 (en) | 2003-04-02 | 2005-02-03 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for wagering based on the movement of financial markets |
US20040204232A1 (en) | 2003-04-10 | 2004-10-14 | Asher Joseph M. | Real-time interactive wagering on event outcomes |
US20050044029A1 (en) | 2003-04-11 | 2005-02-24 | Babcock & Brown Lp, A Delaware Limited Partnership | Hybrid securities having protection against event risk using uncorrelated last-to-default baskets |
US20050004862A1 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2005-01-06 | Dale Kirkland | Identifying the probability of violative behavior in a market |
US20050049962A1 (en) | 2003-06-04 | 2005-03-03 | Porter Keith Alan | Method, computer program product, and system for risk management |
US20050043078A1 (en) | 2003-08-22 | 2005-02-24 | Sundstrom Stephen J. | Game based upon fluctuations of an objective environment |
US20050049956A1 (en) | 2003-09-02 | 2005-03-03 | Glenn Ballman | A System for Securities Exchange with Price Instability Alerts that are triggered when a security moves outside "pre-set"and/or Dynamically Calculated trading Price Ranges Over a Network |
US20050176499A1 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2005-08-11 | Asip Holdings, Inc. | Parimutual progressive pool controller |
US20050176495A1 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2005-08-11 | Asip Holdings, Inc. | Summary of quick pick odd/payoff stabilizer |
US20050080702A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2005-04-14 | Manoj Modi | System and method of compiling real property information from a central database |
WO2005039712A2 (en) | 2003-10-21 | 2005-05-06 | United Tote Company | Methods of pari-mutuel wagering based upon fixed odds and /or share purchase |
US20050086143A1 (en) | 2003-10-21 | 2005-04-21 | Vlazny Kenneth A. | Methods of pari-mutuel wagering based upon fixed odds and/or share purchase |
US20050108148A1 (en) | 2003-11-17 | 2005-05-19 | Charles Carlson | System and method of investing in a market |
US20050181868A1 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2005-08-18 | Vlazny Kenneth A. | Methods and systems for presenting pari-mutuel betting options and constructing wagers |
WO2005057339A2 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2005-06-23 | United Tote Company | Methods and systems for presenting pari-mutuel betting options and constructing wagers |
US20050171878A1 (en) | 2004-02-03 | 2005-08-04 | Pennock David M. | Dynamic pari-mutuel market |
WO2005074557A2 (en) | 2004-02-03 | 2005-08-18 | Overture Services, Inc. | Dynamic pari-mutuel market |
US20050182704A1 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-18 | Om Technology Ab | Multi site solution for securities trading |
US20050197190A1 (en) | 2004-02-25 | 2005-09-08 | Amaitis Lee M. | System and method for convenience gaming |
US20050187850A1 (en) | 2004-02-25 | 2005-08-25 | Stuart Horowitz | Method for efficient investment and distribution of assets |
US20050187020A1 (en) | 2004-02-25 | 2005-08-25 | Amaitis Lee M. | System and method for convenience gaming |
US20070185653A1 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2007-08-09 | Bresch David N | Method and system for automated location dependent probabilistic tropical cyclone forecast |
US20050202873A1 (en) | 2004-03-10 | 2005-09-15 | Asher Joseph M. | System and method for high-speed pari-mutuel wagering |
US20070011619A1 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2007-01-11 | Bay-Wei Chang | Method, system, and graphical user interface for dynamically updating transmission characteristics in a web mail reply |
WO2005109281A2 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-17 | Cfph, Llc | Wagering based on the movement of financial market |
US20050245306A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-03 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for mapping results from sporting events to game inputs |
US20050245308A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-03 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for wagering based on financial market indicators |
US20050245305A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-03 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for pari-mutuel gaming based on sporting event results |
US20050245310A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-03 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for wagering based on multiple financial market indicators |
US20050288081A1 (en) | 2004-06-28 | 2005-12-29 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for gaming based upon intermediate points in a race event |
USD519570S1 (en) | 2004-09-14 | 2006-04-25 | Cfph, Llc | Graphic user interface for wagering based on multiple financial market indicators |
US7144011B2 (en) | 2004-10-12 | 2006-12-05 | Cantor Index Llc | System and method for providing a blackjack game having additional options for a player |
US20060085310A1 (en) | 2004-10-14 | 2006-04-20 | Cfph Llc | System and method for facilitating a wireless financial transaction |
US20060100951A1 (en) | 2004-11-08 | 2006-05-11 | Cfph Llc | System and method for implementing push technology in a wireless financial transaction |
WO2006055035A1 (en) | 2004-11-15 | 2006-05-26 | Paul Kent Graeve | Casino games based on financial market activity |
US20060199631A1 (en) | 2004-11-15 | 2006-09-07 | Mcgill Bradley J | Casino games based on financial market activity |
US20060105840A1 (en) | 2004-11-15 | 2006-05-18 | Graeve Paul K | Casino games based on financial market activity |
US20060105839A1 (en) | 2004-11-15 | 2006-05-18 | Delta Rangers, Inc. | Casino game based on financial market activity |
US20060111951A1 (en) | 2004-11-19 | 2006-05-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Time polynomial arrow-debreu market equilibrium |
US20060116917A1 (en) | 2004-11-19 | 2006-06-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Time polynomial arrow-debreu market equilibrium |
US20060173774A1 (en) | 2005-02-01 | 2006-08-03 | Frankel Oliver L | Systems and methods for improving auction liquidity |
WO2006099382A2 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2006-09-21 | United Tote Company | Determining scores, winners, and prizes in a contest activity |
US20060264253A1 (en) | 2005-03-21 | 2006-11-23 | Trobia Andrew G | Wagering game with diagnostic graphical user interface |
US20060240891A1 (en) | 2005-04-11 | 2006-10-26 | Klinkhammer Keith A | Marketing system and method for customer specific promotions |
WO2006115534A2 (en) | 2005-04-22 | 2006-11-02 | Harry B Platis | Pari-mutuel wagering on large entrant pools system and method |
US20060265313A1 (en) | 2005-05-17 | 2006-11-23 | Fung Kevin K | Trading bids with bounded odds by auction |
WO2006130624A2 (en) | 2005-06-01 | 2006-12-07 | Mahaffey Clayton R | Methods and systems for betting with pari-mutuel payouts |
US20070005481A1 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2007-01-04 | Vijay Kedia | Real time graphical user interface for on-line trading |
WO2007008597A2 (en) | 2005-07-08 | 2007-01-18 | Cfph, Llc | System for wireless gaming with user profiles |
WO2007008601A2 (en) | 2005-07-08 | 2007-01-18 | Cfph, Llc | System for peer-to-peer wireless gaming |
WO2007008713A2 (en) | 2005-07-08 | 2007-01-18 | Cfph, Llc | System for providing wireless gaming as a service application |
US20070016861A1 (en) | 2005-07-15 | 2007-01-18 | Nokia Corporation | Apparatus and methods for implementing modular, context-aware active graphical user interface objects |
US20070021165A1 (en) | 2005-07-21 | 2007-01-25 | Ma Jeffrey K | Graphical user interface for a fantasy sports application |
WO2007015921A2 (en) | 2005-07-26 | 2007-02-08 | Cantor Index Llc | System and method for conducting a jackpot race event |
WO2007024605A2 (en) | 2005-08-19 | 2007-03-01 | Mark Benrus | Method of pari-mutuel wagering in real time |
WO2007033198A2 (en) | 2005-09-13 | 2007-03-22 | Magna Entertainment Corp. | Methods and systems for conducting pari-mutuel wagers |
US20070083458A1 (en) | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-12 | Rosenthal Collins Group, L.L.C. | Method and system for providing a graphical user interface and trading system for professional electronic trading |
Non-Patent Citations (29)
Title |
---|
"A Dynamic Pari-Mutuel Market for Hedging, Wagering, and Information Aggregation", (ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, May 17, 2004), published by David M. Pennock. |
"A Model of a General Parimutuel System: Characterizations and Equilibrium Selection"; Takahiro Watanabe, author; International Journal of Game Theory 23; 1994; pp. 237-260. |
"A Parimutuel System with Two Horses and a Continuum of Bettors"; Watanabe Takahiro, author; Journal of Mathematical Economics 28; Apr. 1994; pp. 85-100. |
"A Statistical Model for Characterizing Price Variability with Application to Dairy Investment Analysis"; Terry Ross Smith, author; Jan. 1980; pp. 1-2. |
"Adaptive Control Using Multiple Models"; Kumpati S. Narendra, Jeyendran Balakrishnan, authors; IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 42, No. 2, Feb. 1997; pp. 171-187. |
"Call and Continuous Trading Mechanisms Under Asymmetric Information: An Experimental Investigation"; Charles R. Schnitzlein, author; Journal of Finance; Jun. 1996; pp. 613-636. |
"Constrained Moments Simulation of Healthcare Capital Acquisitions"; D. F. Kocaoglu et al., authors; Jan. 1997; p. 1. |
"Controlled diffusion processes"; Vivek S. Borkar, author; Probability Surveys, vol. 2 (2005); pp. 213-244. |
"Dynamic Hedging Strategies"; Simon Benninga and Zvi Wiener; vol. 7 No. 1 (1998); 5 pp. |
"Electronic Call Market Trading"; Nicholas Economides and Robert A. Schwartz, authors; Journal of Portfolio Management; Spring 1995; pp. 10-18. |
"Financial Risk Analysis Using Financial Risk Simulation Prog"; Sabah U. Randhawa, James A. Douglas, authors; Sep. 1993; pp. 1-4. |
"Implied Risk-Neutral Probability Density Functions from Option Prices: Theory and Application"; Bhupinder Bahra, author; Bank of England; 1997; ISSN 1368-5562. |
"Integrating Call and Continuous Markets"; Robert A. Schwartz, author; Securities Traders Monthly; Sep. 1991; pp. 14-16. |
"Japanese Investment Posts Strong Momentum"; Sun Hong, author; Feb. 1997; pp. 1-2. |
"Lack of Debt Trades Stunts Market-HSBC" Business World, Manila; Sep. 1998; pp. 1-2. |
"Macro Markets and Financial Security"; Stefano Athanasoulis, Robert Shiller and Eric van Wincoop, authors; FRBNY Economic Policy Review; Apr. 1999; pp. 21-39. |
"Measuring Up: What CEOs Look For in Their Chief Financial Officers"; Mintz, S L, author; Feb. 1994; pp. 1-5. |
"On the Use of Martingales in Monte Carlo Approaches to Multiperiod Parameter Uncertainty in Capital Investment Risk Analysis"; W. J. Hurley, author; Jan. 1998; pp. 1-6. |
"Parimutuel Betting Markets as Information Aggregation Devices: Experimental Results"; C. R. Plott, J. Wit, W.C. Yang, authors; Caltech Social Science Working Paper 986; Apr. 1997. |
"Real Bonds, Real Time, Real Fast"; Tatiana D. Helenius, author, Wall Street & Technology; Apr. 1998; pp. 1-4. |
"River Runs Dry: Big Hong Kong Property Deal Falls Through"; Jonathan Karp, author; Nov. 12, 1992; pp. 1-2. |
"Simulation of Hurricane Risk in the U.S. Using Empirical Track Model"; P.J. Vickery, P.F. Skerlj, and L.A. Twisdale, authors; Journal of Structural Engineering, Oct. 2000, pp. 1222-1237. |
"Structural Organization of Secondary Markets: Clearing Frequency, Dealer Activity and Liquidity Risk"; Kenneth D. Garbade and William L. Silber, authors; Journal of Finance 34; Jun. 1979; pp. 577-593. |
"Theory and Applications of Adaptive Control-A Survey"; K.J. Astrom, author; Automatica, vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 471-486, 1983. |
"Trade Using One Commodity as a Means of Payment"; Lloyd Shapley and Martin Shubik, authors; Journal of Political Economy 85; 1997; pp. 937-968. |
"Trading Mechanisms in Securities Markets"; Ananth Madhavan, author; Journal of Finance; Jun. 1992; pp. 607-641. |
"Transparency and Liquidity: A comparison of Auction and Dealer Markets with Informed Trading"; Marco Pagano and Ailsa Röell, authors; 1996; pp. 579-611. |
Notification; International Search Report for International application No. PCT/US05/46467; Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US05/46467 (8 pp.). |
UK Decision No. BL O/366/04 from The Patent Office, Dec. 14, 2004; Applicant: CFPH L.L.C. |
Cited By (44)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8354933B2 (en) * | 2005-11-15 | 2013-01-15 | Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd. | Trigger system for monitoring and/or control devices and/or early warning systems for nascent and/or occurring cyclones |
US20090303056A1 (en) * | 2005-11-15 | 2009-12-10 | Swiss Reinsurance Company | Trigger system for monitoring and/or control devices and/or early warning systems for nascent and/or occurring cyclones |
US20080248868A1 (en) * | 2006-07-17 | 2008-10-09 | Brian Pilcher | Trading system and method using a virtual pari-mutuel pool |
US20080147417A1 (en) * | 2006-12-14 | 2008-06-19 | David Friedberg | Systems and Methods for Automated Weather Risk Assessment |
US20080249955A1 (en) * | 2007-04-03 | 2008-10-09 | Weatherbill, Inc. | System and method for creating customized weather derivatives |
US20090259521A1 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2009-10-15 | Yitts Anthony M | Method of Identifying Innovations Possessing Business Disrupting Properties |
US8170894B2 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2012-05-01 | Yitts Anthony M | Method of identifying innovations possessing business disrupting properties |
US8505813B2 (en) | 2009-09-04 | 2013-08-13 | Bank Of America Corporation | Customer benefit offer program enrollment |
US8751298B1 (en) | 2011-05-09 | 2014-06-10 | Bank Of America Corporation | Event-driven coupon processor alert |
US9892419B1 (en) | 2011-05-09 | 2018-02-13 | Bank Of America Corporation | Coupon deposit account fraud protection system |
US20140114879A1 (en) * | 2012-10-23 | 2014-04-24 | Santosh John Thomas | Systems and methods for providing investing opportunities |
US20150170288A1 (en) * | 2013-12-12 | 2015-06-18 | The Travelers Indemnity Company | Systems and methods for weather event-based insurance claim handling |
US20150332146A1 (en) * | 2014-05-15 | 2015-11-19 | National Taiwan University | Device and method for comparison of multiple tropical cyclone routes |
US9690007B2 (en) * | 2014-05-15 | 2017-06-27 | National Taiwan University | Device and method for comparison of multiple tropical cyclone routes |
USD985610S1 (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2023-05-09 | 23Andme, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD916905S1 (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2021-04-20 | 23Andme, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD913330S1 (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2021-03-16 | 23Andme, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD955427S1 (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2022-06-21 | 23Andme, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD969156S1 (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2022-11-08 | 23Andme, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD891470S1 (en) * | 2015-10-20 | 2020-07-28 | 23Andme, Inc. | Display screen or portion therof with graphical user interface |
US20220253937A1 (en) * | 2016-07-01 | 2022-08-11 | Cfph, Llc | Interface for landfall location options |
US11869082B2 (en) * | 2016-07-01 | 2024-01-09 | Cfph, Llc | Interface for landfall location options |
US10313480B2 (en) | 2017-06-22 | 2019-06-04 | Bank Of America Corporation | Data transmission between networked resources |
US10524165B2 (en) | 2017-06-22 | 2019-12-31 | Bank Of America Corporation | Dynamic utilization of alternative resources based on token association |
US10511692B2 (en) | 2017-06-22 | 2019-12-17 | Bank Of America Corporation | Data transmission to a networked resource based on contextual information |
US11190617B2 (en) | 2017-06-22 | 2021-11-30 | Bank Of America Corporation | Data transmission to a networked resource based on contextual information |
US10986541B2 (en) | 2017-06-22 | 2021-04-20 | Bank Of America Corporation | Dynamic utilization of alternative resources based on token association |
USD864233S1 (en) * | 2018-06-04 | 2019-10-22 | Skyrock Partners, LLC | Display screen with a list generation graphical user interface |
USD869496S1 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2019-12-10 | Skyrock Partners, LLC | Display screen with a list generation graphical user interface |
USD895678S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-08 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD896271S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-15 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD894960S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-01 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD897372S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-29 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD896840S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-22 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD896839S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-22 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
USD895679S1 (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2020-09-08 | Baxter International Inc. | Portable electronic display with animated GUI |
US11188853B2 (en) | 2019-09-30 | 2021-11-30 | The Travelers Indemnity Company | Systems and methods for artificial intelligence (AI) damage triage and dynamic resource allocation, routing, and scheduling |
USD946025S1 (en) * | 2020-10-19 | 2022-03-15 | Splunk Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof having a graphical user interface for monitoring information |
USD946026S1 (en) * | 2020-10-19 | 2022-03-15 | Splunk Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof having a graphical user interface for a metrics-based presentation of information |
USD946020S1 (en) * | 2020-10-19 | 2022-03-15 | Splunk Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof having a graphical user interface for an application home page |
USD955409S1 (en) * | 2020-12-15 | 2022-06-21 | Cowbell Cyber, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with a graphical user interface |
USD945485S1 (en) * | 2020-12-15 | 2022-03-08 | Cowbell Cyber, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with a graphical user interface |
USD968457S1 (en) * | 2021-04-05 | 2022-11-01 | Chemtreat, Inc | Portion of a monitor display with graphical user interface |
USD968456S1 (en) * | 2021-04-05 | 2022-11-01 | Chemtreat, Inc | Portion of a monitor display with graphical user interface |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7917420B2 (en) | 2011-03-29 |
US20080059355A1 (en) | 2008-03-06 |
US20100042552A1 (en) | 2010-02-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7584134B2 (en) | Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather events | |
US8055563B2 (en) | Financial activity based on natural weather events | |
US7593883B2 (en) | Financial activity based on tropical weather events | |
US7783544B2 (en) | Financial activity concerning tropical weather events | |
US7783542B2 (en) | Financial activity with graphical user interface based on natural peril events | |
US7783543B2 (en) | Financial activity based on natural peril events | |
US8266042B2 (en) | Financial activity based on natural peril events | |
US20130024342A1 (en) | Activity relating to ongoing financial events | |
US20090259581A1 (en) | Financial activity relating to natural peril events | |
Shah | Public sector governance and accountability series | |
CN101185096A (en) | Financial activity based on tropical weather events | |
Hammett | Risk analysis and disaster recovery: A Florida LIHTC case study | |
Dayal | The fundamentals of insurance: Theories, principles and practices | |
ASSESSMENT | THE ENABLING ENVIRONMENT FOR DISASTER RISK FINANCING IN NEPAL | |
Mazikana | The Consequence of Political Risk and Corruption on Firm and Stock Market Development in Zimbabwe | |
Rode | Abstraction and Intermediation: The Implications of Behavioral Decision Making for Three Applications in Finance | |
Weinkle | The Prediction Racket: Constructing, Characterizing and Governing Florida's Hurricane Risk |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WEATHER RISK SOLUTIONS, LLC, FLORIDA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HOROWITZ, KENNETH ALAN;REEL/FRAME:020891/0233 Effective date: 20080415 Owner name: WEATHER RISK SOLUTIONS, LLC,FLORIDA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HOROWITZ, KENNETH ALAN;REEL/FRAME:020891/0233 Effective date: 20080415 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.) |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20170901 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES FILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PMFP); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PRDP | Patent reinstated due to the acceptance of a late maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20200515 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES GRANTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PMFG); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SMAL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |