Classifications

• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
  • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D21H5/00—Special paper or cardboard not otherwise provided for
  • D21H5/12—Special paper or cardboard not otherwise provided for characterised by the use of special fibrous materials
  • D21H5/14—Special paper or cardboard not otherwise provided for characterised by the use of special fibrous materials of cellulose fibres only
  • D21H5/141—Special paper or cardboard not otherwise provided for characterised by the use of special fibrous materials of cellulose fibres only of fibrous cellulose derivatives
• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
  • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D21H21/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
  • D21H21/50—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties characterised by form
  • D21H21/52—Additives of definite length or shape
  • D21H21/54—Additives of definite length or shape being spherical, e.g. microcapsules, beads

Definitions

• U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,388,150 and 4,385,961 disclose the use of a two-component binder system comprising a cationic starch and an anionic, colloidal, silicic acid sol as a retention aid when combined with cellulose fibers in a stock from which is made.
• Finnish Published Specification Nos. 67,735 and 67,736 refer to cationic polymer retention agent compounds including cationic starch and polyacrylamide as useful in combination with an anionic silica to improve sizing.
• No. 4,798,653 discloses the use of cationic colloidal silica sol with an anionic copolymer of acrylic acid and acrylamide to render the paper stock resistant to destruction of its retention and dewatering properties by shear forces in the paper-making process.
• a coacervate binder, three component system composed of a cationic starch, an anionic high molecular weight polymer and dispersed silica having a particle diameter range from 1 to 50 nm is revealed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,643,801 and 4,750,974.
• silica sol and bentonite are inorganic microparticle materials.
• Latices of organic microparticles have been used in high concentrations of 30-70 lbs/ton to give "high-strength" paper products such as gasket materials, roofing felt, paperboard and floor felt and in paper with 30-70% mineral fillers (U.S. Pat. No. 4,445,970). It is stated that latices have not been used in fine papermaking because such latices are sticky and difficult to use on a Fourdrinier machine. The latices of the above and following four patent references were made according to U.S. Pat. No. 4,056,501.
• the use of an organic crosslinked microbead, in papermaking is taught in Japanese Patent Tokkai JP235596/63:1988 and Kami Pulp Gijitsu Times, pgs 1-5, March 1989 as a dual system of a cationic or anionic organic microbead of 1-100 microns and an anionic, cationic or nonionic acrylamide polymer.
• the waterswelling type, cationic, polymer particle is a crosslinked homopolymer of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl trimethylammonium chloride or a crosslinked copolymer of 2-methacryloyloxy-ethyl trimethylammonium chloride/acrylamide (60/40 weight percent).
• the acrylamide polymer is an acrylamide homopolymer or acrylamide hydroylsate of 17 mole percent anion-conversion or a copolymer of acrylamide/2-methacryloyloxyethyl trimethylammoniumchloride (75/25 weight percent).
• the anionic microbead is an acrylamide-acrylic acid copolymer.
• EPO 0273605 teaches the addition of microbeads having a diameter ranging from about 49-87 nm and produced from terpolymers of vinyl acetate (84.6), ethyl acrylate (65.4) and acrylic acid (4.5) or methacrylonitrile (85), butyl acrylate (65) and acrylic acid (3).
• These polymeric beads are disclosed as added to an LBKP pulp slurry in order to evaluate the resultant paper for sizing degree, paper force enhancement and disintegratability.
• These polymer beads fall outside the scope of those used in the present invention in that the ionic content thereof is too small to impart any appreciable improvement in retention and drainage in the papermaking process.
• the present invention encompasses crosslinked, ionic, organic, polymeric microbeads of less than about 750 nm in diameter or microbeads of less than about 60 nm in diameter if noncrosslinked and water-insoluble, as a retention and drainage aid, their use in papermaking processes, and compositions thereof with high molecular weight polymers and/or polysaccharides.
• EP 0,202,780 describes the preparation of crosslinked, cationic, polyacrylamide beads by conventional inverse emulsion polymerization techniques.
• Crosslinking is accomplished by the incorporation of difunctional monomer, such as methylenebisacrylamide, into the polymer chain.
• This crosslinking technology is well known in the art. The patent teaches that the crosslinked beads are useful as flocculants but are more highly efficient after having been subjected to unusual levels of shearing action in order to render them water-soluble.
• the particle size of polymers prepared by conventional, inverse, water-in-oil, emulsion, polymerization processes are limited to the range of 1-5 microns, since no particular advantage in reducing the particle size has hitherto been apparent.
• the particle size which is achievable in inverse emulsions is determined by the concentration and activity of the surfactant(s) employed and these are customarily chosen on the basis of emulsion stability and economic factors.
• the present invention is directed to the use, in papermaking, of cationic and anionic, crosslinked, polymeric, microbeads.
• Microgels are made by standard techniques and microlatices are purchased commercially.
• the polymer microbeads are also prepared by the optimal use of a variety of high activity- surfactant or surfactant mixtures to achieve submicron size.
• the type and concentration of surfactant should be chosen to yield a particle size of less than about 750 nm in diameter and more preferably less than about 300 nm in diameter.
• a method of making paper from a aqueous suspension of cellulosic papermaking fibers whereby improved drainage, retention and formation properties are achieved.
• the method comprises adding to the suspension, from about 0.05 to 20 lbs/ton of an ionic, organic polymer microbead of less than about 750 nanometers in diameter if crosslinked or a polymeric microbead of less than about 60 nm in diameter if noncrosslinked and insoluble.
• lbs/ton from about or 0.05 to about 20 lbs/ton, preferably about 0.1-5.0 lbs/ton, of a high molecular weight, hydrophilic ionic organic polymer, and/or from about 1.0 to about 50.0, preferably about 5.0-30.0, lbs/ton of an ionic polysaccharide, such as starch, preferably of a charge opposite that of the microbead, may be used.
• the synthetic organic polymer and polysaccharide may also be of opposite charge to each other.
• the addition of the microbead compositions results in significant increase in fiber retention and improvement in drainage and formation, said lbs/ton being based on the dry weight of the paper furnish solids.
• the organic polymer microbeads may be either cationic or anionic.
• Alum or any other active, soluble aluminum species such as polyhydroxyaluminum chloride and/or sulfate and mixtures thereof have been found to enhance drainage rates and retention if they are incorporated into the furnish when used with the microbead compositions 0.1 to 20 lbs/ton, as alumina, based on the dry weight of paper furnish solids, are exemplary.
• microbeads may be made as microemulsions by a process employing an aqueous solution comprising a cationic or anionic monomer and crosslinking agent; an oil comprising a saturated hydrocarbon; and an effective amount of a surfactant sufficient to produce particles of less than about 0.75 micron in unswollen number average particle size diameter.
• Microbeads are also made as microgels by procedures described by Ying Huang et. al., Makromol. Chem. 186, 273-281 (1985) or may be obtained commercially as microlatices.
• microbead as used herein, is meant to include all of these configurations, i.e. beads per se, microgels and microlatices.
• Polymerization of the emulsion may be carried out by adding a polymerization initiator, or by subjecting the emulsion to ultraviolet irradiation.
• An effective amount of a chain transfer agent may be added to the aqueous solution of the emulsion, so as to control the polymerization.
• the crosslinked, organic, polymeric microbeads have a high efficiency as retention and drainage aids when their particle size is less than about 750 nm in diameter and preferably less than about 300 nm in diameter and that the noncrosslinked, organic, water-insoluble polymer microbeads have a high efficiency when their size is less than about 60 nm.
• the efficiency of the crosslinked microbeads at a larger size than the noncrosslinked microbeads may be attributed to the small strands or tails that protrude from the main crosslinked polymer.
• ionic, organic, crosslinked, polymeric microbeads of a diameter less than about 750 nm or the noncrosslinked, water-insoluble beads of less than about 60 nm in diameter according to this invention, improved drainage, formation and greater fines and filler retention values are obtained in papermaking processes.
• additives may be added, alone or in conjunction with other materials, as discussed below, to a conventional paper making stock such as traditional chemical pulps, for instance, bleached and unbleached sulphate or sulphite pulp, mechanical pulp such as groundwood, thermomechanical or chemi-thermomechanical pulp or recycled pulp such as deinked waste and any mixtures thereof.
• the stock, and the final paper can be substantially unfilled or filled, with amounts of up to about 50%, based on the dry weight of the stock, or up to about 40%, based on dry weight of paper of filler, being exemplary.
• any conventional filler such as calcium carbonate, clay, titanium dioxide or talc or a combination may be present.
• the filler if present, may be incorporated into the stock before or after addition of the microbeads.
• Other standard paper-making additives such as rosin sizing, synthetic sizings such as alkyl succinic anhydride and alkyl ketene dimer, alum, strength additives, promoters, polymeric coagulants such as low molecular weight polymers, dye fixatives, etc. and other materials that are desirable in the papermaking process, may also be added.
• the preferred sequence of addition is cationic, high molecular weight polymer and then anionic bead.
• a cationic polysaccharide such as starch and a cationic polymer are both used, they can be added separately or together, and in any order. Furthermore, their individual addition may be at more than one point
• the anionic microbeads may be added before any cationic components or after them with the latter being the preferred method. Split addition may also be practised. Preferred practise is to add cationic polysaccharide before high molecular weight cationic polymer.
• the furnish may already have cationic starch, alum, cationic (or anionic or both cationic and anionic) polymers of molecular weight equal or less than 100,000, sodium aluminate, and basic aluminum salts (e.g., polyaluminum chloride and/or sulfate) and their levels may be varied to improve the response of the furnish, as discussed above.
• Addition points are those typically used with dual retention & drainage systems (pre-fan pump or pre-screen for one component and pre- or post-screens for another). However, adding the last component before the fan pump may be warranted in some cases. Other addition points that are practical can be used if better performance or convenience is obtained. Thick stock addition of one component is also possible, although thin stock addition is preferred.
• anionic polymer(s) and cationic microbeads When using high molecular weight, anionic polymer(s) and cationic microbeads, the preferred sequence is anionic polymer and then cationic beads, although in some cases the reverse may be used. When anionic polymer and anionic polysaccharide are both used, they can be added separately or together, and in any order.
• microbeads may also be used in combination with high molecular weight ionic polymers of similar or opposite charge.
• the microbeads are crosslinked, cationic or anionic, polymeric, organic microparticles having an unswollen number average particle size diameter of less than about 750 nanometers and a crosslinking agent content of above about 4 molar parts per million based on the monomeric units present in the polymer and are generally formed by the polymerization of at least one ethylenically unsaturated cationic or anionic monomer and, optionally, at least one non-ionic comonomer in the presence of said crosslinking agent. They preferably have a solution viscosity (SV) of about 1.1-2.0 mpa.s.
• SV solution viscosity
• Cationic microbeads used herein include those made by polymerizing such monomers as diallyldialkylammmonium halides; acryloxyalkyltrimethylammonium chloride; (meth)acrylates of dialkylaminoalkyl compounds, and salts and quaternaries thereof and, monomers of N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl(meth)acrylamides, and salt and quaternaries thereof, such as N,N-dimethyl aminoethylacrylamides; (meth)acrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium chloride and the acid or quaternary salts of N,N-dimethylaminoethylacrylate and the like.
• Cationic monomers which may be used herein are of the following general formulae: ##STR1## where R 1 is hydrogen or methyl, R 2 is hydrogen or lower alkyl of C 1 to C 4 , R 3 and/or R 4 are hydrogen, alkyl of C 1 to C 12 , aryl, or hydroxyethyl and R 2 and R 3 or R 2 and R 4 can combined to form a cyclic ring containing one or more hetero atoms, Z is the conjugate base of an acid, X is oxygen or --NR 1 wherein R 1 is as defined above, and A is an alkylene group of C 1 to C 12 ; or ##STR2## where R 5 and R 6 are hydrogen or methyl, R 7 is hydrogen or alkyl of C 1 to C 12 and R 8 is hydrogen, alkyl of C 1 to C 12 , benzyl or hydroxyethyl; and Z is as defined above.
• Anionic microbeads that are useful herein those made by hydrolyzing acrylamide polymer microbeads etc. those made by polymerizing such monomers as (methyl)acrylic acid and their salts, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate, sulfoethyl-(meth)acrylate, vinylsulfonic acid, styrene sulfonic acid, maleic or other dibasic acids or their salts or mixtures thereof.
• Nonionic monomers suitable for making microbeads as copolymers with the above anionic and cationic monomers, or mixtures thereof, include (meth)acrylamide; N-alkyacrylamides, such as N-methylacrylamide; N,N-dialkylacrylamides, such as N,N-dimethylacrylamide; methyl acrylate; methyl methacrylate; acrylonitrile; N-vinyl methylacetamide; N-vinyl methyl formamide; vinyl acetate; N-vinyl pyrrolidone, mixtures of any of the foregoing and the like.
• N-alkyacrylamides such as N-methylacrylamide
• N,N-dialkylacrylamides such as N,N-dimethylacrylamide
• methyl acrylate methyl methacrylate
• acrylonitrile N-vinyl methylacetamide
• N-vinyl methyl formamide vinyl acetate
• N-vinyl pyrrolidone mixtures of any of
• ethylenically unsaturated, non-ionic monomers may be copolymerized, as mentioned above, to produce cationic, anionic or amphoteric copolymers.
• acrylamide is copolymerized with an ionic and/or cationic monomer.
• Cationic or anionic copolymers useful in making microbeads comprise from about 0 to about 99 parts, by weight, of non-ionic monomer and from about 100 to about 1 part, by weight, of cationic or anionic monomer, based on the total weight of the anionic or cationic and non-ionic monomers, preferably from about 10 to about 90 parts, by weight, of non-ionic monomer and about 10 to about 90 parts, by weight, of cationic or anionic monomer, same basis i.e. the total ionic charge in the microbead must be greater than about 1%. Mixtures of polymeric microbeads may also be used if the total ionic charge of the mixture is also over about 1%.
• the total anionic charge thereof must be at least about 5%.
• the microbeads contain from about 20 to 80 parts, by weight, of non-ionic monomer and about 80 to about 20 parts by weight, same basis, of cationic or anionic monomer or mixture thereof.
• Polymerization of the monomers occurs in the presence of a polyfunctional crosslinking agent to form the cross-linked microbead.
• Useful polyfunctional crosslinking agents comprise compounds having either at least two double bounds, a double bond and a reactive group, or two reactive groups.
• Illustrative of those containing at least two double bounds are N,N-methylenebisacrylamide; N,N-methylenebismethacrylamide; polyethyleneglycol diacrylate; polyethyleneglycol dimethacrylate; N-vinyl acrylamide; divinylbenzene; triallylommonium salts, N-methylallylacrylamide and the like.
• Polyfunctional branching agents containing at least one double bond and at least one reactive group include glycidyl acrylate; glycidyl methacrylate; acrolein; methylolacrylamide and the like.
• Polyfunctional branching agents containing at least two reactive groups include dialdehydes, such as gyloxal; diepoxy compounds; epichlorohydrin and the like.
• Crosslinking agents are to be used in sufficient quantities to assure a cross-linked composition.
• at least about 4 molar parts per million of crosslinking agent based on the monomeric units present in the polymer are employed to induce sufficient crosslinking and especially preferred is a crosslinking agent content of from about 4 to about 6000 molar parts per million, most preferably, about 20-4000.
• the polymeric microbeads of this invention are preferably prepared by polymerization of the monomers in an emulsion as disclosed in application, Ser. No. 07/535,626 filed June 11, 1990. Polymerization in microemulsions and inverse emulsions may be used as is known to those skilled in this art. P. Jardinr reported in 1976 and 1977 a process for making spherical "nanoparticles" with diameters less than 800 ⁇ by (1) solubilizing monomers, such as acrylamide and methylenebisacrylamide, in micelles and (2) polymerizing the monomers, See J. Pharm. Sa., 65(12), 1763 (1976) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,021,364.
• the cationic and/or anionic emulsion polymerization process is conducted by (i) preparing a monomer emulsion by adding an aqueous solution of the monomers to a hydrocarbon liquid containing appropriate surfactant or surfactant mixture to form an inverse monomer emulsion consisting of small aqueous droplets which, when polymerized, result in polymer particles of less than 0.75 micron in size, dispersed in the continuous oil phase and (ii) subjecting the monomer microemulsion to free radical polymerization.
• the aqueous phase comprises an aqueous mixture of the cationic and/or anionic monomers and optionally, a non-ionic monomer and the crosslinking agent, as discussed above.
• the aqueous monomer mixture may also comprise such conventional additives as are desired
• the mixture may contain chelating agents to remove polymerization inhibitors, pH adjusters, initiators and other conventional additives.
• Essential to the formation of the emulsion which may be defined as a swollen, transparent and thermodynamically stable emulsion comprising two liquids insoluble in each other and a surfactant, in which the micelles are less than 0.75 micron in diameter, is the selection of appropriate organic phase and surfactant.
• the selection of the organic phase has a substantial effect on the minimum surfactant concentration necessary to obtain the inverse emulsion.
• the organic phase may comprise a hydrocarbon or hydrocarbon mixture. Saturated hydrocarbons or mixtures thereof are the most suitable in order to obtain inexpensive formulations.
• the organic phase will comprise benzene, toluene, fuel oil, kerosene, odorless mineral spirits or mixtures of any of the foregoing.
• the ratio, by weight, of the amounts of aqueous and hydrocarbon phases is chosen as high as possible, so as to obtain, after polymerization, an emulsion of high polymer content. Practically, this ratio may range, for example for about 0.5 to about 3:1, and usually approximates about 1:1, respectively.
• the one or more surfactants are selected in order to obtain HLB (Hydrophilic Lipophilic Balance) value ranging from about 8 to about lI. Outside this range, inverse emulsions are not usually obtained
• HLB Hydrophilic Lipophilic Balance
• the concentration of surfactant must also be optimized, i.e. sufficient to form an inverse emulsion. Too low a concentration of surfactant leads to inverse emulsions of the prior art and too high a concentrations results in undue costs.
• Typical surfactants useful, in addition to those specifically discussed above, may be anionic, cationic or nonionic and may be selected from polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan trioleate, sorbitan trioleate, sodium di-2-ethylhexylsulfosuccinate, oleamidopropyldimethylamine; sodium isostearyl-2-lactate and the like.
• Polymerization of the emulsion may be carried out in any manner known to those skilled in the art. Initiation may be effected with a variety of thermal and redox free-radical initiators including azo compounds, such as azobisisobutyronitrile; peroxides, such as t-butyl peroxide; organic compounds, such as potassium persulfate and redox couples, such as ferrous ammonium sulfate/ammonium persulfate. Polymerization may also be effected by photochemical irradiation processes, irradiation, or by ionizing radiation with a 60 Co source.
• azo compounds such as azobisisobutyronitrile
• peroxides such as t-butyl peroxide
• organic compounds such as potassium persulfate and redox couples, such as ferrous ammonium sulfate/ammonium persulfate.
• Polymerization may also be effected by photochemical irradi
• Preparation of an aqueous product from the emulsion may be effected by inversion by adding it to water which may contain a breaker surfactant.
• the polymer may be recovered from the emulsion by stripping or by adding the emulsion to a solvent which precipitates the polymer, e.g. isopropanol, filtering off the resultant solids, drying and redispersing in water.
• the high molecular weight, ionic, synthetic polymers used in the present invention preferably have a molecular weight in excess of 100,000 and preferably between about 250,000 and 25,000,000. Their anionicity and/or cationicity may range from 1 mole percent to 100 mole percent.
• the ionic polymer may also comprise homopolymers or copolymers of any of the ionic monomers discussed above with regard to the ionic beads, with acrylamide copolymers being preferred.
• the degree of substitution of cationic starches (or other polysaccharides) and other non-synthetic based polymers may be from about 0.01 to about 1.0, preferably from about 0.02 to about 0.20. Amphoteric starches, preferably but not exclusively with a net cationic starch, may also be used. The degree of substitution of anionic starches (or other polysaccharides) and other non-synthetic-based polymers may be from 0.01 to about 0.7 or greater.
• the ionic starch may be made from starches derived from any of the common starch producing materials, e.g., potato starch, corn starch, waxy maize, etc.
• a cationic potato starch made by treating potato starch with 3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyltrimethylammonium chloride.
• Mixtures of synthetic polymers and e.g. starches, may be used.
• Other polysaccharides useful herein include guar, cellulose derivatives such as carboxymethylcellulose and the like.
• the high molecular weight, ionic polymer be of a charge opposite that of the microbead and that if a mixture of synthetic, ionic polymers or starch be used, at least one be of a charge opposite that of the microbead.
• the microbeads may be used as such or may be replaced in part, i.e. up to about 50%, by weight, with bentonite or a silica such as colloidal silica, modified colloidal silica etc. and still fall within the scope of the percent invention.
• compositions of matter comprising mixtures of the above-described ionic microbeads, high molecular weight, ionic polymers and polysaccharides. More particularly, compositions comprising a mixture of A) an ionic, organic, polymer microbead of less than about 750 nanometers in diameter if cross-linked and less than 60 nanometers in diameter if non-cross-linked and water-insoluble and B) a high molecular weight ionic polymer, the ratio of A): B) ranging from about 1:400 to 400:1, respectively.
• compositions may contain the microbead A) and C) an ionic polysaccharide, the ratio of A):C) ranging from about 20:1 to about 1:1000, respectively. Still further, the compositions may contain the microbead A), the polymer B) and the polysaccharide C), the ratio of A) to B) plus C) ranging from about 400:1 to about 1:1000, respectively.
• the ionic organic polymer microbead and/or the high molecular weight, ionic polymer and/or ionic starch are added sequentially directly to the stock or just before the stock reaches the headbox.
• First Pass Retention is a measure of the percent of solids that are retained in the paper.
• Drainage is a measure of the time required for a certain volume of water to drain through the paper and is here measured as a 10 ⁇ drainage. (K. Britt, TAPPI 63(4) p67 (1980). Hand sheets are prepared on a Noble and Wood sheet machine.
• the ionic polymer and the microbead are added separately to the thin stock and subjected to shear. Except when noted, the charged microbead (or silica or bentonite) is added last. Unless noted, the first of the additives is added to the test furnish in a "Vaned Britt Jar” and subjected to 800 rpm stirring for 30 seconds. Any other additive is then added and also subjected to 800 rpm stirring for 30 seconds. The respective measurements are then carried out.
• Cationic polymers used in the examples are:
• Cationic Starch Potato starch treated with 3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyltrimethylammonium chloride to give a 0.04 degree of substitution.
• AETMAC/90 AMD A linear cationic copolymer of 10 mole % of acryloxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride and 90 mole % of acrylamide of 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 mol. wt. with a charge density of 1.2 meg./g.
• 5 AETMAC/95 AMD A linear copolymer of 5 mole % of acryloxyethltrimethylammonium chloride and 90 mole % of acrylamide of 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 mol. wt.
• AETMAC/45 AMD A linear copolymer of 55 mole % of acryloxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride and 45 mole % of acrylamide of 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 mol. wt. and a charge density of 3.97 meg./g.
• AETMAC/60 AMD A linear copolymer of 40 mole % of acryloxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride and 60 mole % of acrylamide of 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 mol. mt.
• EPI/47 DMA 3 EDA A copolymer of 50 mole % of epichlorohydrin, 47 mole % of dimethylamine and 3.0 mole % of ethylene diamine of 250,000 mol. wt
• Anionic Polymers used in the examples are:
• 30 AA/70 AMD A linear copolymer of 30 mole % ammonium acrylate and 70 mole % of acrylamide of 15,000,000 to 20,000,000 mol. wt.
• 7AA/93 AMD A linear copolymer of 7 mole % ammonium acrylate and 93 mole % of acrylamide of 15,000,000 to 20,000,000 mol. wt.
• 10 APS/90 AMD A linear copolymer of 10 mole % of sodium 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonate and 90 mole % of acrylamide of 15,000,000 to 20,000,000 mol. wt.
• Anionic particles used in the examples are:
• SILICA Colloidal silica with an average size of 5 nm, stabilized with alkali and commercially available.
• BENTONITE Commercially available anionic swelling bentonite from clays such as sepiolite, attapulgite or montmorillonite as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,305,781.
• Microbeads used in the examples are:
• 40 AA/60 MBA A microbead dispersion of a copolymer of 40 mole % of ammonium acrylate and 60 mole % of N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) with a particle diameter of 220*nm.
• 30 AA/70 AMD/349 pom MBA A microemulsion copolymer of 30 mole % of sodium acrylate and 70 mole % of acrylamide crosslinked with 349 ppm of N,N'-methylenebisacrylanide (MBA) of 130*nm particle diameter, SV-1.17 to 1.19 mPa.s
• MBA A microemulsion copolymer of 30 mole % of sodium acrylate and 70 mole % of acrylamide crosslinked with 749 ppm of N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA), Sv-1.06 mPa.s.
• MBA A microemulsion copolymer of 60 mole % of sodium acrylate and 40 mole % of acrylamide crosslinked with 1,381 ppm of N,N'-methylene-bis acrylamide (MBA) of 120*nm particle diameter; SV-1.10 mPa.s.
• MBA A microemulsion copolymer of 30 mole % of sodium 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate and 70 mole % of acrylamide crosslinked with 995 ppm of methylenebisacrylamide (MBA); SV-1.37 mPa.s.
• An aqueous phase is prepared by sequentially mixing 147 parts of acrylic acid, 200 parts deionized water, 144 parts of 56.5% sodium hydroxide, 343.2 parts of acrylamide crystal, 0.3 part of 10% pentasodium diethylenetriaminepentaacetate, an additional 39.0 parts of deionized water, and 1.5 parts of 0.52% copper sulfate pentahydrate.
• aqueous phase solution 6.5 parts of deionized water, 0.25 part of 1% t-butyl hydroperoxide and 3.50 parts of 0.61% methylene bisacrylamide are added.
• aqueous phase 120 Parts of the aqueous phase are then mixed with an oil phase containing 77.8 parts of low odor paraffin oil, 3.6 parts of sorbitan sesquioleate and 21.4 parts of polyoxyethylene sorbitol hexaoleate.
• the polymer may be recovered from the emulsion by stripping or by adding the emulsion to a solvent which precipitates the polymer, e.g. isopropanol, filtering off the resultant solids, and redispersing in water for use in the papermaking process.
• a solvent which precipitates the polymer e.g. isopropanol
• the precipitated polymer microbeads may be dried before redispersion in water.
• the microemulsion per se may also be directly dispersed in water.
• dispersion in water may require using a high hydrophilic lipopilic balance (HLB) inverting surfactant such as ethoxylated alcohols; polyoxyethlated sorbitol hexaoleate; diethanolamine oleate; ethoxylated laurel sulfate et. as in known in the art.
• HLB hydrophilic lipopilic balance
• the concentration of the microbeads in the above-described redispersion procedures is similar to that used with other thin stock additives, the initial dispersion being at least 0.1%, by weight.
• the dispersion may be rediluted 5-10 fold just before addition to the papermaking process.
• An aqueous phase containing 21.3 parts, by weight of acrylamide, 51.7 parts of a 75% acryloxyethyltrimethyl ammonium chloride solution, 0.07 part of 10% diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (penta sodium salt), 0.7 part of 1% t-butyl hydroperoxide and 0.06 part of methylenebisacrylamide dissolved in 65.7 parts of deionized water is prepared.
• the pH is adjusted to 3.5 ( ⁇ 0.1).
• An oil phase composed of 8.4 parts of sorbitan sesquioleate, 51.6 parts of polyoxyethylene sorbitol hexaoleate dissolved in 170 parts of a low odor paraffin oil is prepared.
• the aqueous and oil phase are mixed together in an air tight polymerization reactor fitted with a nitrogen sparge tube, thermometer and activator addition tube.
• the resultant clear microemulsion is sparged with nitrogen for 30 minutes and the temperature is adjusted to 27.5° C.
• Gaseous sulfur dioxide activator is then added by bubbling nitrogen through a solution of sodium metabisulfite.
• the polymerization is allowed to exotherm to its maximum temperature (about 520° C.) and then cooled to 25° C.
• the particle diameter of the resultant polymer microbead is found to be 100 nm.
• the unswollen number average particle diameter in nanometers (nm) is determined by quasi-elastic light scattering spectroscopy (QELS).
• QELS quasi-elastic light scattering spectroscopy
• the SV is 1.72 mPa.s.
• An aqueous phase is made by dissolving 87.0 parts of commercial, crystal acrylamide (AMD), 210.7 parts of a 75% acryloxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride (AETMAC) solution, 4.1 parts of ammonium sulfate, 4.9 parts of a 5% ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid (disodium salt) solution, 0.245 part (1000 wppm) of methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) and 2.56 parts of t-butyl hydroperoxide into 189 parts of deionized water. The pH is adjusted to 3.5 ( ⁇ 0.1) with sulfuric acid.
• the oil phase is made by dissolving 12.0 gms of sorbitan monooleate into 173 parts of a low odor paraffin oil.
• the aqueous phase and oil phase are mixed together and homogenized until the particle size is in the 1.0 micron range.
• the emulsion is then transferred to a one liter, three-necked, creased flask equipped with an agitator, nitrogen sparge tube, sodium metabisulfite activator feed line and a thermometer.
• the emulsion is agitated, sparged with nitrogen and the temperature adjusted to 25° C.
• 0.8% sodium metabisulfite (MBS) activator solution is added at a 0.028 ml/minute rate.
• the polymerization is allowed to exotherm and the temperature is controlled with ice water. When cooling is no longer needed, the 0.8% MBS activator solution/addition rate is increased and a heating mantle is used to maintain the temperature.
• the total polymerization time takes approximately 4 to 5 hours using 11 mls of MBS activator.
• the finished emulsion product is then cooled to 25° C.
• the particle diameter is found to be 1,000 nm.
• the unswollen number average particle diameter in nanometers is determined by the quasi-elastic light scattering spectroscopy (QELS).
• QELS quasi-elastic light scattering spectroscopy
• the SV is 1.24 mPa.s.
• the drainage times are measured on 1) alkaline stock containing 5% CaCO 3 , alone, 2) the same stock with added linear, high molecular weight cationic copolymer of 10 mole % acryloxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride and 90 mole % of acrylamide (10 AETMAC/90 AMD) and 3) the same stock with added cationic copolymer and anionic microbead made from 30 mole % acrylic acid 70 mole % of acrylamide (30 AA/70 AMD) and cross-linked with 349 ppm of methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) of 130 nm particle diameter and added as a redispersed 0.02% aqueous solution.
• MFA methylenebisacrylamide
• cationic polymer reduces drainage time from 88.4 to 62.3 seconds. Surprisingly microbeads reduce the drainage times by another 24.8 seconds to 37.5 seconds, a 39.8% reduction which is a significant improvement in drainage times.
• the alkaline furnish used in this example contains 5.0 lbs/ton of cationic starch. To this furnish is added to following additives as described in Example 1. Drainage times are then measured and reported in Table II, below.
• anionic polymer microbeads greatly improves drainage.
• Example 1 The procedure of Example 1 is again followed except that first pass retention values are measured.
• the organic anionic microbead is compared at a 0.5 lbs/ton rate to 2.0 lbs/ton of silica and 5.0 lbs/ton of bentonite in an alkaline paper stock as known in the art.
• the organic, 30% anionic polymer microbeads give the best retention values at a lower concentration, as shown in Table V, below.
• Example 1 The procedure of Example 1 is again followed except that alum is added to the stock immediately before the cationic polymer.
• the test furnish is alkaline stock containing 5.0 lbs/ton of cationic starch and 25% CaCO 3 . The results are set forth below in Table VI.
• the alum-treated furnish which is contracted with the polymer microbead has a faster drainage rate than that treated with 10 times as much bentonite.
• an equivalent drainage time of 46.1 seconds is achieved.
• This example demonstrates the greater efficiency of the anionic organic polymer microbeads of the present invention used with alum as compared to bentonite alone. This efficiency is not only attained using a significantly lower anionic microbead dose but, also enable the use of a lower amount of cationic polymer.
• the furnish is alkaline and contains 5.0 lbs/ton of cationic starch. The procedure of Example 1 is again used The results are shown in Table VII, below.
• the anionic organic microbeads used with alum are approximately 20 fold more efficient than bentonite used alone (0.25 lb. vs. 5.0 lbs.).
• the cationic polymer level can be reduced in half (0.50 lb. vs. 1.0 lb.) compared to bentonite when the microbead level is raised to 0.50 lb., which is 10 fold lower than the bentonite dose.
• Example 7 The procedure of Example 7 is again followed except that polyaluminum chloride is used in place of alum. As can be seen, in Table VIII, equivalent results are achieved.
• Example 1 To a batch of alkaline paper stock is added cationic starch. The drainage time is measured after addition of the following additives set forth in Table IX, below. The procedure of Example 1 is again used.
• the alum/polymer microbead combination gives better drainage rates than the polymer/bentonite combination without alum.
• First pass retention is measured on an alkaline furnish containing 5.0 lbs/ton of starch to which the additives of Table X, below, are added.
• microbead and bentonite give similar retentions with 0.5 lb/ton of cationic polymer but with higher concentrations of polymer better retention is obtained with the microbeads.
• the polyamine is used alone and in combination with 0.5 lbs/ton of microbead copolymer of 60% acrylic acid and 40% acrylamide cross linked with 1,381 ppm of methylenebisacrylamide and having 120 nm diameter particle size. From the data of Table XII it is seen that addition of the highly effective organic microbead cuts drainage time in half from 128.1 to 64.2 seconds.
• a test is run on stock from a commercial paper mill
• the paper stock consists of 40% hardwood/30% soft wood/30% broke containing 12% calcium carbonate, 4% clay, and 2.5 lbs/ton of alkyl succinic anhydride (ASA) synthetic size emulsified with 10 lbs/ton cationic potato starch.
• ASA alkyl succinic anhydride
• An additional 6 lbs/ton of cationic potato starch and 6 lbs/ton of alum are also added to this stock.
• the additives listed in Table XIII, below, are added and drainage times are measured, as in Example 1.
• the paper stock from the above run has a 153.7 second drainage time
• Significant reduction of drainage time to 80.3 seconds is achieved with 0.5 lb/ton of high molecular weight, cationic polymer and 5 lbs/ton of bentonite.
• Replacement of the bentonite with a mere 0.25 lb/ton of organic anionic microbeads reduces drainage time another 10.7 seconds to 69.9 seconds.
• the microbeads at 1/20 the concentration give a superior drainage time to bentonite.
• the use of 0.5 lb/ton of the microbeads reduces the drainage time to 57.5 seconds. This is 22.8 seconds faster than ten times the weight of bentonite.
• drainage time is 71.9 seconds.
• the drainage time is 49.1 seconds which is 22.8 seconds faster than bentonite with one tenth the amount of microbead.
• the effect of using a cationic polymer of a lower charge density is investigated on the paper stock that was used in proceeding Example 13 and shown in Table XIV.
• the cationic polymer used, 5 AETMAC/95 AMD, has one half the charge density as that of 10 AETMAC/90 AMD that was used in Example 13. All else remains the same.
• Example 13 To evaluate the effect of the charge density of the cationic polymer on retention, to the furnish of Example 13, are added the additives shown in Table XVI. First pass retention values are measured, as in Example 5.
• Polymer microbeads are shown to be effective when used with high molecular weight, cationic polymers of lower charge density.
• a stock is taken from a second commercial mill. It is a goal of this example to demonstrate that microbeads/alum give equivalent drainage times to those of current commercial systems.
• the mill stock consists of 45% deinked secondary fiber/25% softwood/30% broke containing 15% calcium carbonate and 3.0 lbs/ton of alkyl ketene dimer synthetic size emulsified with 10 lbs/ton of cationic starch.
• a second portion of 10 lbs of cationic starch is added to the thick stock and the ingredients listed in Table XVII, below are added to the furnish, as described in Example 1.
• microbeads/alum gives a faster drainage rate than the commercial bentonite system used in the mills routine production of paper. Other experimental runs result in lesser conclusive effectiveness with this pulp.
• Microbead retention efficiency is evaluated on papers made using a pilot Fourdrinier papermaking machine.
• the paper stock consists of pulp made from 70% hardwood and 30% softwood containing 25% calcium carbonate and 5 lbs/ton of cationic starch.
• the additives in the Table XVIII, below, are placed into the furnish in successive runs and first pass retention percentages are measured.
• a 46 lb base weight paper is made.
• the combination of 0.5 lb/ton of microbeads and 2.5 lbs/ton of alum results in a 5.7% superior retention over 7.0 lbs/ton of bentonite alone.
• the 7.0 lbs/ton of bentonite is about equal to the combination of 0.25 lbs of beads and 2.5 lbs/ton of alum in retention properties, a significant dosage reduction.
• Example 19 In comparing the heavier (55 lb) basis weight paper of Example 19 to that of Example 18 (46 lb), under all conditions, the heavier paper has better retention. With the heavier paper there is no significant difference in retention between the paper prepared with bentonite alone and that prepared with microbeads and either 2.5 lbs or 5 lbs of alum, except the significant dosage reduction i.e. 71bs. vs. 0.5 lb.
• microbead on paper formation is evaluated by treatment of an alkaline furnish containing 5.0 lbs/ton of starch with the additives listed in Table XX, below, as described in Example 18.
• Microbeads give superior hand sheet paper formation and better drainage times compared to bentonite, and at a lower dosage.
• Hand sheets from the first three samples have equivalent formation (A) by visual observation.
• the last two samples (B) themselves have equivalent formation by visual observation but their formation is not as good as the first three sheets.
• the experiment shows the superior drainage times are achieved with a microbead alum combination with equivalent visual paper formation as compared to bentonite, above, at higher dosage.
• a 30 nm polystyrene bead is compared to bentonite inperformance using the alkaline paper stock containing 5.0 lbs/ton of cationic starch, above described in Example 22. Results are set forth in Table XXIV.
• Microbead size of anionic polymer is studied by measuring drainage rates on the alkaline paper stock of Example 23 to which the additives of Table XXV are added. Results are specified therein.
• Both the 130 nm and 220 nm in diameter microbeads reduce drainage times over that of stock without microbeads by 33%. However, when the diameter of the anionic microbead is increased to 1,000 to 2,000 nm, drainage is not significantly effected.
• the microbeads of the 30 AA/70 AMD/349 ppm MBA copolymer and those of the 30 APS/70 AMD/995 ppm MBA copolymer when used with cationic polymers produces paper with almost identical drainage times, even though one has a carboxylate and the other has a sulfonate functional group. That the anionic beads have different chemical compositions and a differing degree of cross-linking yet yield similar properties is attributed to this similar charge densities and similar particle size.
• the acrylic acid microbead has a diameter of 130 nm and the 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-propane sulfonic acid microbead is of a similar size due to the similar way it was made.
• High molecular weight cationic polymer is added to the furnish in a vaned Britt jar under agitation and agitation is continuous for the period specified before the microbead is added as in Example 1, agitation is continued, and the drainage measurement taken.
• 0.5 lb of polymeric anionic microbeads is superior to 5.0 lbs of bentonite in increasing drainage.
• 5.0 lb/ton of bentonite lowers drainage time 10% while 0.5 lb/ton of microbeads lowers it 19.3% and 1.0 lb/ton of microbeads lowers it 25.9%.
• This example demonstrates the effect of alum on drainage in the acid paper process when acid stock from Example 29 is used without initial alum addition.
• a set of drainage times is measured for this stock without alum present and a second series is measured with 5.0 lbs/ton of added alum and with the ingredients set forth in Table XXX.
• the enhancement of drainage time with the added alum is a significant advantage of the present invention.
• Example 31 The polymeric, anionic microbead and the silica starch systems of Example 31 are compared for first pass retention values using the alkaline paper stock of Example 2. The results are shown in Table XXXII, below.
• Retention values using silica and the organic anionic microbead of Table XXXIII are compared in a pilot Fourdrinier papermaking machine.
• the paper stock consists of pulp made from 70% hardwood and 30% softwood containing 25% calcium carbonate and 5 lbs/ton of cationic starch.
• the cationic potato starch is added immediately before the fan pump.
• the anionic microbeads and alum are added as in Example 18.
• Alum improves the retention values of silica and the alum/silica system retention of 66.3% is slightly less than that of the alum/organic anionic microbead system of 68.7% (3.5% improvement) with 166 the concentration of microbead.
• the silica/starch system is inferior in drainage time to that of the organic microbead system (1.0 lb and 2.5 lbs alum).
• Example 34 organic, anionic, microbead and silica systems, using a anionic polymer added to the furnish, are compared as to drainage times as in said Example.
• Alum and cationic starch are added where indicated and the furnish is stirred at 800 r.p.m. for 30 seconds.
• the anionic acrylamide copolymers and, if added, silica or microbeads are added together to the furnish and stirred for a further 30 seconds at 800 r.p.m. before the drainage rate is measured. See Table XXXV.
• Silica improves drainage times when compared to the anionic acrylamide polymer alone; however, the anionic organic microbeads, in replacing the silica, give even better drainage times with alum. Additional cationic potato starch in the furnish allows the microbead system to produce even faster drainage times.
• Comparative retention values are determined for an organic anionic microbead versus a silica system using an anionic polymer and the paper stock of Example 13.
• the additives, as specified in Table XXXVI, are added as in Example 35.
• Retention values with 0.3 lb/ton of anionic polymer, with and without silica, are identical at 34% and addition of 5.0 lbs/ton of alum and no silica actually increases retention to 37.3%.
• Anionic polymers in combination with organic anionic microbeads however, give better retention values without (40.3%) and with alum (52.6%) when compared to the silica system (34%). This retention when combined with the faster drainage rates of the organic anionic microbeads shown in Table XXXV, makes them preferable to either the silica or bentonite systems usually used commercially.

Landscapes

• Paper (AREA)
• Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)
• Glass Compositions (AREA)
• Compositions Of Macromolecular Compounds (AREA)

Priority Applications (18)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Related Parent Applications (1)

Related Child Applications (1)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=24156437

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (17)

Cited By (89)

Families Citing this family (17)

Citations (9)

Family Cites Families (4)

• 1990
  • 1990-06-18 US US07/540,667 patent/US5167766A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
• 1991
  • 1991-03-27 AT AT91104837T patent/ATE161910T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 1991-03-27 DE DE69128563T patent/DE69128563T2/de not_active Revoked
  • 1991-03-27 DK DK91104837.9T patent/DK0462365T3/da active
  • 1991-03-27 EP EP91104837A patent/EP0462365B1/en not_active Revoked
  • 1991-03-27 ES ES91104837T patent/ES2111543T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1991-04-02 AU AU74021/91A patent/AU646441B2/en not_active Expired
  • 1991-04-05 AR AR91319406A patent/AR247438A1/es active
  • 1991-04-29 BR BR919101722A patent/BR9101722A/pt not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 1991-06-05 NZ NZ238402A patent/NZ238402A/xx not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 1991-06-07 MX MX026158A patent/MX174548B/es unknown
  • 1991-06-12 JP JP3166104A patent/JP2948358B2/ja not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1991-06-14 CA CA002044698A patent/CA2044698C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1991-06-17 NO NO912348A patent/NO178441C/no not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 1991-06-17 ZA ZA914628A patent/ZA914628B/xx unknown
  • 1991-06-17 FI FI912924A patent/FI105841B/fi active
  • 1991-06-17 KR KR1019910010011A patent/KR100189327B1/ko not_active IP Right Cessation

Patent Citations (9)