[go: up one dir, main page]

US3900975A - Cryogenic grinding of copper - Google Patents

Cryogenic grinding of copper Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3900975A
US3900975A US471478A US47147874A US3900975A US 3900975 A US3900975 A US 3900975A US 471478 A US471478 A US 471478A US 47147874 A US47147874 A US 47147874A US 3900975 A US3900975 A US 3900975A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
copper
workpiece
grinding
abrasive
cryogenic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US471478A
Inventor
John Bernard Lightstone
Richard Benedict Mazzarella
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Praxair Technology Inc
Original Assignee
Union Carbide Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Union Carbide Corp filed Critical Union Carbide Corp
Priority to US471478A priority Critical patent/US3900975A/en
Priority to CA225,978A priority patent/CA1020356A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3900975A publication Critical patent/US3900975A/en
Assigned to UNION CARBIDE INDUSTRIAL GASES TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE. reassignment UNION CARBIDE INDUSTRIAL GASES TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: UNION CARBIDE INDUSTRIAL GASES INC.
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC. reassignment PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). EFFECTIVE ON 06/12/1992 Assignors: UNION CARBIDE INDUSTRIAL GASES TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24BMACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B55/00Safety devices for grinding or polishing machines; Accessories fitted to grinding or polishing machines for keeping tools or parts of the machine in good working condition
    • B24B55/02Equipment for cooling the grinding surfaces, e.g. devices for feeding coolant
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24BMACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B1/00Processes of grinding or polishing; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such processes
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T83/00Cutting
    • Y10T83/04Processes
    • Y10T83/0405With preparatory or simultaneous ancillary treatment of work
    • Y10T83/041By heating or cooling
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T83/00Cutting
    • Y10T83/283With means to control or modify temperature of apparatus or work

Definitions

  • This invention relates, in general, to abrasive processes, and more particularly, to an improved method for abrasively grinding copper metal.
  • the abrasive grinding of metal is an operation in which hard, sharp and friable abrasive particles are used as cutting tools.
  • the abrasive particles are generally embedded in a wheel which is power driven as it contacts the workpiece.
  • abrasive processes yield fine surface textures and precise workpiece di' mensions and are considered, for the most part, finishing operations, Among the abrasive processes in common use are grinding, honing, lapping, superfinishing, abrasive machining and abrasive cutting.
  • grinding is the best known and most common abrasive process. In contradistinction to most other metal cutting operations, grinding is a self-sharpening process. That is, as the abrasive particles wear during cutting they either fracture or are torn from the bonding material exposing new and sharp cutting edges. In order for the abrasive particles to maintain their sharp cutting edge, it is essential that they wear abrasively during normal operation. Abrasive wear occurs when a rough hard surface, such as an abrasive grit, contacts a softer surface (i.e. the workpiece) and cuts a series of grooves therein; the removed workpiece material taking the form of long helicoidal chips which are generally thrown clear of the abrasion contact zone.
  • abrasive grit contacts a softer surface (i.e. the workpiece) and cuts a series of grooves therein; the removed workpiece material taking the form of long helicoidal chips which are generally thrown clear of the abrasion contact zone.
  • Adhesive wear is an undesirable type of wear which 7 may occur during abrasive processing depending upon the rate of metal removal and the composition of the workpiece. It is basically a form of material removal which occurs when the fragments of the workpiece surface which are removed by the abrasive particles adhere to such particles rather than forming loose chips of metal. Microscopic observation reveals that during adhesive wear small elements of the workpiece come into contact with the abrasive particles, adhere to said particles and when contact is broken, the break occurs not at the original interface but rather within the individual elements of the workpiece. As a result; the grinding surface becomes progressively loaded with the material being abraded to the point where the abrasive particles are unable to cut the workpiece efficiently. Consequently, adhesive wear results in a very unsmooth workpiece surface and a marked increase in the shearing force required for abrasion.
  • High purity copper is considered an extremely difficult material to grind because of its tendency to wear adhesively during abrasion. That is, when copper is abrasively machined it readily loads the grinding wheel, even at relatively low speeds corresponding to metal removal rates far lower than conventionally used for metals such as steel. Consequently, copper grinding is a relatively lengthy and expensive machining operation.
  • coolants have been used to lower the temperature at the cut surface of the workpiece. Thus, coolants such as water and liquid CO have been directed at the grinding wheel and the work surface in attempts to conduct heat away from the tool-'work interface.
  • the copper workpiece is cooled by immersing substantially the entire workpiece in liquid nitrogen.
  • the cooled workpiece is thereafter abraded while remaining immersed in the cryogenic liquid.
  • abrasively grinding as used herein is intended to encompass abrasive processes such as surface grinding, honing, lapping, superfinishing, abrasive cutting and abrasive machining.
  • Surface grinding, honing, lapping and superfinishing are finishing operations intended to produce uniform high accuracy and fine finish on a surface.
  • Abrasive machining is an abrasive process in which the primary aim is metal removal while abrasive cutting is an abrasive process intended to sever metal parts.
  • copper refers to pure copper metal as well as to copper alloys having either less than two weight percent of alloying elements or copper alloys having a hardness below Rockwell B25 irrespective of the percentage of alloying elements.
  • copper includes such alloys as the aluminum bronzes and beryllium copper.
  • cryogenic temperature as used herein is intended to encompass the range of temperatures corresponding to conventional cryogenic fluids such as liquid N and liquid CO Accordingly, cooling of the workpiece to a cryogenic temperature refers to temperatures below C with liquid N being the preferred cryogen.
  • the invention is predicated on the discovery that the tendency of copper to wear adhesively during abrasive grinding can be substantially reduced or eliminated at relatively high rates of metal removal if the copper workpiece is maintained at a sufficiently low temperature during the grinding operation.
  • cooling of the workpiece was beneficial but only if it occurred at the grinding interface, namely, within the zone of contact between the abrasive particles and the workpiece.
  • a heat-sink effect is created which allows the frictional heat generated at thework surface to be rapidly dissipated throughout the entire workpiece, thereby avoiding the transition from an abrasive wear process to an adhesive wear process at commercially practical metal removal rates.
  • the FIGURE is a plot of shear force vs. feed rate during the abrasive cutting of copper for three different modes of cooling the workpiece.
  • the grinding operations contemplated by the present invention include all of the types in common use such as surface, cylindrical, internal, centerless and off-hand grinding.
  • the first four types of operations are used primarily to obtain accurate dimensions and good surface finishes.
  • the material to be ground is generally fed against the grinding wheel which is rotated at a velocity sufficient to attain a surface speed of from about 3000-5000 ft/min.
  • Finishing operations such as honing, lapping and superfinishing are characterized by the extreme fineness of the abrasive particles.
  • Off-hand grinding is used mainly where metal removal is of prime importance and dimensions are not critical.
  • a cut-off wheel is used to sever metal parts such as risers, sprues and flushing from castings.
  • the primary aim is metal removal, not surface finish.
  • Adhesive wear is a problem common to all abrasive grinding operations, but particularly, when the workpiece is a soft and ductile metal such as copper.
  • the presence of adhesive wear during copper grinding can be visually detected by numerous methods. First, the abrasive surface can be examined to determine the extent of copper loading thereon; second, the surface of the workpiece can be examined to determine whether the resulting finish is characteristic of abrasive or adhesive wear; and finally, the chips of metal ejected from the tool-work contact area can be examined to determine whether they are nodular or helicoidal in shape, the former being characteristic of adhesive wear and the latter indicating abrasive wear.
  • Cooling of the copper workpiece to cryogenic temperatures is accomplished by immersing substantially ture; not merely the area of contact between the workpiece and the abrasive surface as in conventional practice. By cooling the entire workpiece in the manner disclosed, it is believed that a heat-sink effect is created which prevents a rapid temperature rise at the worktool interface and the concomittant loading of the abra sive wheel with copper chips.
  • EXAMPLE A series of experiments were conducted with annealed, electrolytic tough pitch copper to determine the effect of various modes of cooling the workpiece on the grinding operation.
  • An abrasive cut-off machine was modified to permit measurement of the shear force exerted by the grinding wheel as copper barswere severed at varying rates of feed.
  • a 10 inch diameter x 1/16 inch TC HRR wheel manufactured by the Carborundum Company was used in all the experiments. The wheel speed was kept constant at 2100 rpm.
  • a process for abrasively grinding copper comprising the steps of:

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)

Abstract

A process for abrasively grinding copper comprising (1) cooling the entire copper workpiece to a cryogenic temperature and (2) abrasively grinding the copper workpiece while it is at said cryogenic temperature. The workpiece is preferably immersed in liquid N2 during the abrasive grinding thereby preventing adhesive wear from occurring at relatively high metal removal rates.

Description

Lightstone et a1.
1 1 CRYOGENIC GRINDING OF COPPER [75] Inventors: John Bernard Lightstone, White Plains, N.Y.; Richard Benedict Mazzarella, Indianapolis, Ind.
[73] Assignee: Union Carbide Corporation, New
York, NY.
[22] Filed: May 20, 1974 [21] App]. No.: 471,478
[52] US. Cl. 51/322; 83/15; 83/170 [51] Int. Cl B24b l/OO; B24b 55/02 [58] Field of Search 51/2 F, 266, 267, 322, 51/284; 241/DIG. 13, DIG. 22, 3, 15, l7, 18, 23; 82/1 C, 47; 83/15, 16, 170, 171
[56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,635,399 4/1953 West .1 51/322 2,917,160 12/1959 Turinsky 51/267 X 1.1.1 o n: E
2 CC I L|J I U) Aug. 26, 1975 2,924,873 2/1960 Knowles 51/267 X 3,072,347 1/1963 Dombrowski 241/23 X 3,091,144 5/1963 Villalobos 83/15 3,430,390 3/1969 Wolcott 51/267 X 3,643.873 2/1972 George 241/3 3,750,272 8/1973 Gomond 51/284 UX 11/1973 Frable 241/23 X Primary Examiner-Donald G. Kelly Attorney, Agent, or FirmB. Lieberman 57 ABSTRACT 3 Claims, 1 Drawing Figure FEED RATE (cm. secT'l PATENTEB AUBZ 6 [975 A 7 .50 v NEE OH;
(1 X) HOHOzI HVBHS CRYOGENIC GRINDING OF COPPER BACKGROUND This invention relates, in general, to abrasive processes, and more particularly, to an improved method for abrasively grinding copper metal.
The abrasive grinding of metal is an operation in which hard, sharp and friable abrasive particles are used as cutting tools. The abrasive particles are generally embedded in a wheel which is power driven as it contacts the workpiece. In general, abrasive processes yield fine surface textures and precise workpiece di' mensions and are considered, for the most part, finishing operations, Among the abrasive processes in common use are grinding, honing, lapping, superfinishing, abrasive machining and abrasive cutting.
Grinding is the best known and most common abrasive process. In contradistinction to most other metal cutting operations, grinding is a self-sharpening process. That is, as the abrasive particles wear during cutting they either fracture or are torn from the bonding material exposing new and sharp cutting edges. In order for the abrasive particles to maintain their sharp cutting edge, it is essential that they wear abrasively during normal operation. Abrasive wear occurs when a rough hard surface, such as an abrasive grit, contacts a softer surface (i.e. the workpiece) and cuts a series of grooves therein; the removed workpiece material taking the form of long helicoidal chips which are generally thrown clear of the abrasion contact zone.
Adhesive wear is an undesirable type of wear which 7 may occur during abrasive processing depending upon the rate of metal removal and the composition of the workpiece. It is basically a form of material removal which occurs when the fragments of the workpiece surface which are removed by the abrasive particles adhere to such particles rather than forming loose chips of metal. Microscopic observation reveals that during adhesive wear small elements of the workpiece come into contact with the abrasive particles, adhere to said particles and when contact is broken, the break occurs not at the original interface but rather within the individual elements of the workpiece. As a result; the grinding surface becomes progressively loaded with the material being abraded to the point where the abrasive particles are unable to cut the workpiece efficiently. Consequently, adhesive wear results in a very unsmooth workpiece surface and a marked increase in the shearing force required for abrasion.
High purity copper is considered an extremely difficult material to grind because of its tendency to wear adhesively during abrasion. That is, when copper is abrasively machined it readily loads the grinding wheel, even at relatively low speeds corresponding to metal removal rates far lower than conventionally used for metals such as steel. Consequently, copper grinding is a relatively lengthy and expensive machining operation. In an effort to prolong tool life and prevent localized welding or adhesive wear during the machining of copper, coolants have been used to lower the temperature at the cut surface of the workpiece. Thus, coolants such as water and liquid CO have been directed at the grinding wheel and the work surface in attempts to conduct heat away from the tool-'work interface. These techniques, however, have proven only partially successful because the resulting metal removal rates are only slightly improved beyond those practical at room temperature in the absence of a coolant spray. Consequently, copper abrading operations are presently incapable of being performed at metal removal rates com-.
parable to those for iron and steel.
OBJECTS SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION These and other objects which will become apparent from the detailed disclosure and claims to follow are achieved by the present invention, one aspect of which comprises:
a process for abrasively grinding copper comprising the steps of: i
l. cooling the copper workpiece to be ground to a cryogenic temperature such that substantially the entire workpiece is at said cryogenic temperature, and
2. abrasively grinding said copper workpiece while at said cryogenic temperature, thereby minimizing the tendency of the copper chips removed during abrasion to weld to the grinding surface.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the copper workpiece is cooled by immersing substantially the entire workpiece in liquid nitrogen. The cooled workpiece is thereafter abraded while remaining immersed in the cryogenic liquid.
The term abrasively grinding as used herein is intended to encompass abrasive processes such as surface grinding, honing, lapping, superfinishing, abrasive cutting and abrasive machining. Surface grinding, honing, lapping and superfinishing are finishing operations intended to produce uniform high accuracy and fine finish on a surface. Abrasive machining is an abrasive process in which the primary aim is metal removal while abrasive cutting is an abrasive process intended to sever metal parts.
The term copper as used herein refers to pure copper metal as well as to copper alloys having either less than two weight percent of alloying elements or copper alloys having a hardness below Rockwell B25 irrespective of the percentage of alloying elements. Thus, the term copper includes such alloys as the aluminum bronzes and beryllium copper.
The term cryogenic temperature as used herein is intended to encompass the range of temperatures corresponding to conventional cryogenic fluids such as liquid N and liquid CO Accordingly, cooling of the workpiece to a cryogenic temperature refers to temperatures below C with liquid N being the preferred cryogen.
The invention is predicated on the discovery that the tendency of copper to wear adhesively during abrasive grinding can be substantially reduced or eliminated at relatively high rates of metal removal if the copper workpiece is maintained at a sufficiently low temperature during the grinding operation. Heretofore, it had been believed that cooling of the workpiece was beneficial but only if it occurred at the grinding interface, namely, within the zone of contact between the abrasive particles and the workpiece. It has now been discovered that by sufficiently reducing the temperature of substantially the entire workpiece, a heat-sink effect is created which allows the frictional heat generated at thework surface to be rapidly dissipated throughout the entire workpiece, thereby avoiding the transition from an abrasive wear process to an adhesive wear process at commercially practical metal removal rates. Thus, the fact that a copper workpiece cooled with liquid nitrogen spray directed at the tool-work interface will experience an adhesion wear mechanism at relatively low metal removal rates, while a similar workpiece immersed in liquid nitrogen will remain in the abrasive wear region at metal removal rates normally associated with iron or steel, is truly unexpected. More .over, the surprising nature of the result is underscored by the fact that similar type experiments conducted with materials such as aluminum and iron showed no improvement whatever when comparing the grinding of specimens immersed in liquid nitrogen with specimens which were cooled by directing a liquid coolant spray at the grinding wheel. Indeed, in tests conducted with iron, immersing the workpiece in liquid nitrogen proved to be a less preferred mode of cooling because grinding of the immersed workpiece was accompanied by a marked increase in the shearing force at the grinding surface relative to that required when the grinding wheel was cooled with a liquid spray.
DRAWINGS I The FIGURE is a plot of shear force vs. feed rate during the abrasive cutting of copper for three different modes of cooling the workpiece.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The grinding operations contemplated by the present invention include all of the types in common use such as surface, cylindrical, internal, centerless and off-hand grinding. The first four types of operations are used primarily to obtain accurate dimensions and good surface finishes. The material to be ground is generally fed against the grinding wheel which is rotated at a velocity sufficient to attain a surface speed of from about 3000-5000 ft/min. Finishing operations, such as honing, lapping and superfinishing are characterized by the extreme fineness of the abrasive particles. Off-hand grinding is used mainly where metal removal is of prime importance and dimensions are not critical. In abrasive cutting, a cut-off wheel is used to sever metal parts such as risers, sprues and flushing from castings. In abrasive machining, the primary aim is metal removal, not surface finish.
Adhesive wear is a problem common to all abrasive grinding operations, but particularly, when the workpiece is a soft and ductile metal such as copper. The presence of adhesive wear during copper grinding can be visually detected by numerous methods. First, the abrasive surface can be examined to determine the extent of copper loading thereon; second, the surface of the workpiece can be examined to determine whether the resulting finish is characteristic of abrasive or adhesive wear; and finally, the chips of metal ejected from the tool-work contact area can be examined to determine whether they are nodular or helicoidal in shape, the former being characteristic of adhesive wear and the latter indicating abrasive wear.
Cooling of the copper workpiece to cryogenic temperatures is accomplished by immersing substantially ture; not merely the area of contact between the workpiece and the abrasive surface as in conventional practice. By cooling the entire workpiece in the manner disclosed, it is believed that a heat-sink effect is created which prevents a rapid temperature rise at the worktool interface and the concomittant loading of the abra sive wheel with copper chips.
EXAMPLE A series of experiments were conducted with annealed, electrolytic tough pitch copper to determine the effect of various modes of cooling the workpiece on the grinding operation. An abrasive cut-off machine was modified to permit measurement of the shear force exerted by the grinding wheel as copper barswere severed at varying rates of feed. A 10 inch diameter x 1/16 inch TC HRR wheel manufactured by the Carborundum Company was used in all the experiments. The wheel speed was kept constant at 2100 rpm.
Three sets of experiments were performed corresponding to three modes of cooling the workpiece. In the first set of experiments, water was sprayed on to the cut-off wheel; in the second set, liquid nitrogen was sprayed on to the wheel; and in the third set the copper workpiece was immersed in a dewar flask containing liquid nitrogen such that the work surface was about 1 inch below the level of liquid nitrogen. The results are shown in FIG. 1.
When cooling was accomplished by spraying water or liquid nitrogen on to the wheel, the cutting mechanism is seen to be dependent on feed rate. At low feed rates, below. 0.24 cm secf, the shear force is described by the equation:
where: S is the shear force in kg. wt. and f is the feed rate in cm. secf At higher feed rates, i.e. above 0.043 cm. secf, there is an abrupt increase in the shear force to a value approximately three times the shear force measured at the same feed rate when the copper specimen was immersed in a bath of liquid nitrogen. This discontinuity in the curve indicates a transition from an abrasive wear mechanism to an adhesive wear mechanism. The shear force of the specimen immersed in liquid nitrogen, on the other hand, was invariant with feed rate and is described by equation (1) throughout the range of feed rates studied. In other words, the workpiece immersed in liquid nitrogen remained in an abrasive wear region at feed rates up to three times that ordinarily associated with copper grinding in commercial practice.
What is claimed is:
1. A process for abrasively grinding copper comprising the steps of:
1. cooling the intended copper workpiece to a cryogenic temperature such that substantially the entire workpiece is at said cryogenic temperature, and
2. abrasively grinding said copper workpiece while at said cryogenic temperature thereby minimizing the tendency of the copper chips removed during abrasion to weld to the grinding surface.
2. The process as in claim 1 wherein said workpiece is cooled by immersing substantially the entire workpiece in a cryogenic fluid.
3. The process as in claim 1 wherein said cryogenic fluid is liquid N

Claims (4)

1. A process for abrasively grinding copper comprising the steps of: 1. cooling the intended copper workpiece to a cryogenic temperature such that substantially the entire workpiece is at said cryogenic temperature, and 2. abrasively grinding said copper workpiece while at said cryogenic temperature thereby minimizing the tendency of the copper chips removed during abrasion to weld to the grinding surface.
2. The process as in claim 1 wherein said workpiece is cooled by immersing substantially the entire workpiece in a cryogenic fluid.
2. abrasively grinding said copper workpiece while at said cryogenic temperature thereby minimizing the tendency of the copper chips removed during abrasion to weld to the grinding surface.
3. The process as in claim 1 wherein said cryogenic fluid is liquid N2.
US471478A 1974-05-20 1974-05-20 Cryogenic grinding of copper Expired - Lifetime US3900975A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US471478A US3900975A (en) 1974-05-20 1974-05-20 Cryogenic grinding of copper
CA225,978A CA1020356A (en) 1974-05-20 1975-04-29 Cryogenic grinding of copper

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US471478A US3900975A (en) 1974-05-20 1974-05-20 Cryogenic grinding of copper

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3900975A true US3900975A (en) 1975-08-26

Family

ID=23871789

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US471478A Expired - Lifetime US3900975A (en) 1974-05-20 1974-05-20 Cryogenic grinding of copper

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US3900975A (en)
CA (1) CA1020356A (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4372174A (en) * 1981-05-04 1983-02-08 Petro-Canada Exploration Inc. Method and apparatus for sampling a core of tar sand
US4554025A (en) * 1983-10-03 1985-11-19 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Method of removing built-up layers of organic coatings
US5222332A (en) * 1991-04-10 1993-06-29 Mains Jr Gilbert L Method for material removal
US5509335A (en) * 1994-02-25 1996-04-23 Value Tech Engineering, Inc. Cryogenic vapor oxygen free machining method
US5592863A (en) * 1995-09-25 1997-01-14 Xerox Corporation Cryogenic machining of soft/ductile materials
US5599223A (en) * 1991-04-10 1997-02-04 Mains Jr.; Gilbert L. Method for material removal
US5901623A (en) * 1994-08-09 1999-05-11 The Edison Materials Technology Center Cryogenic machining
GB2400059A (en) * 2003-04-01 2004-10-06 Unova A method and apparatus for grinding using liquid nitrogen coolant
US20070084263A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-04-19 Zbigniew Zurecki Cryofluid assisted forming method
US20070087664A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-04-19 Ranajit Ghosh Method of shaping and forming work materials
US7513121B2 (en) 2004-03-25 2009-04-07 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Apparatus and method for improving work surface during forming and shaping of materials
US7634957B2 (en) 2004-09-16 2009-12-22 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Method and apparatus for machining workpieces having interruptions
US7637187B2 (en) 2001-09-13 2009-12-29 Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Apparatus and method of cryogenic cooling for high-energy cutting operations
US8220370B2 (en) 2002-02-04 2012-07-17 Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Apparatus and method for machining of hard metals with reduced detrimental white layer effect

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2635399A (en) * 1951-04-19 1953-04-21 Thompson Prod Inc Method for grinding carbide tools
US2917160A (en) * 1951-04-12 1959-12-15 Armour & Co Metal working method and lubricant therefor
US2924873A (en) * 1956-02-27 1960-02-16 Gulf Research Development Co Thermally controlled coolant supply for metal cutting tools
US3072347A (en) * 1961-11-02 1963-01-08 Du Pont Metal processing
US3091144A (en) * 1954-09-04 1963-05-28 Villalobos Hum Fernandez-Moran Method of cutting substances
US3430390A (en) * 1965-12-17 1969-03-04 Whittaker Corp Cutting machines and tools for composite materials
US3643873A (en) * 1968-07-25 1972-02-22 George & Cie Process for fragmenting scrap metal
US3750272A (en) * 1970-01-22 1973-08-07 Essilor Int Machining contact lenses of flexible material
US3771729A (en) * 1971-06-17 1973-11-13 Air Prod & Chem Cryogenic comminution system

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2917160A (en) * 1951-04-12 1959-12-15 Armour & Co Metal working method and lubricant therefor
US2635399A (en) * 1951-04-19 1953-04-21 Thompson Prod Inc Method for grinding carbide tools
US3091144A (en) * 1954-09-04 1963-05-28 Villalobos Hum Fernandez-Moran Method of cutting substances
US2924873A (en) * 1956-02-27 1960-02-16 Gulf Research Development Co Thermally controlled coolant supply for metal cutting tools
US3072347A (en) * 1961-11-02 1963-01-08 Du Pont Metal processing
US3430390A (en) * 1965-12-17 1969-03-04 Whittaker Corp Cutting machines and tools for composite materials
US3643873A (en) * 1968-07-25 1972-02-22 George & Cie Process for fragmenting scrap metal
US3750272A (en) * 1970-01-22 1973-08-07 Essilor Int Machining contact lenses of flexible material
US3771729A (en) * 1971-06-17 1973-11-13 Air Prod & Chem Cryogenic comminution system

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4372174A (en) * 1981-05-04 1983-02-08 Petro-Canada Exploration Inc. Method and apparatus for sampling a core of tar sand
US4554025A (en) * 1983-10-03 1985-11-19 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Method of removing built-up layers of organic coatings
US5222332A (en) * 1991-04-10 1993-06-29 Mains Jr Gilbert L Method for material removal
US5599223A (en) * 1991-04-10 1997-02-04 Mains Jr.; Gilbert L. Method for material removal
US5509335A (en) * 1994-02-25 1996-04-23 Value Tech Engineering, Inc. Cryogenic vapor oxygen free machining method
US5901623A (en) * 1994-08-09 1999-05-11 The Edison Materials Technology Center Cryogenic machining
US5592863A (en) * 1995-09-25 1997-01-14 Xerox Corporation Cryogenic machining of soft/ductile materials
US7637187B2 (en) 2001-09-13 2009-12-29 Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Apparatus and method of cryogenic cooling for high-energy cutting operations
US8220370B2 (en) 2002-02-04 2012-07-17 Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Apparatus and method for machining of hard metals with reduced detrimental white layer effect
GB2400059B (en) * 2003-04-01 2005-03-09 Unova Workpiece cooling during grinding
GB2400059A (en) * 2003-04-01 2004-10-06 Unova A method and apparatus for grinding using liquid nitrogen coolant
US7513121B2 (en) 2004-03-25 2009-04-07 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Apparatus and method for improving work surface during forming and shaping of materials
US7634957B2 (en) 2004-09-16 2009-12-22 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Method and apparatus for machining workpieces having interruptions
US20070087664A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-04-19 Ranajit Ghosh Method of shaping and forming work materials
US7390240B2 (en) 2005-10-14 2008-06-24 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Method of shaping and forming work materials
US7434439B2 (en) 2005-10-14 2008-10-14 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Cryofluid assisted forming method
US20070084263A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-04-19 Zbigniew Zurecki Cryofluid assisted forming method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA1020356A (en) 1977-11-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3900975A (en) Cryogenic grinding of copper
US6752709B1 (en) High-speed, low-cost, machining of metal matrix composites
US7101263B2 (en) Flank superabrasive machining
Pal et al. Development and performance evaluation of monolayer brazed cBN grinding wheel on bearing steel
US3152385A (en) Ceramic tools
JP2522278B2 (en) Electroformed thin blade grindstone
CA1247350A (en) Method for extending the life of a cutting tool
Chandler Machining of reactive metals
CN85100128A (en) Superhard, cutting of hardworking material cutter and sharpening and using method
Klocke et al. High-speed grinding of ceramics
Johnson A study of the pickup of abrasive particles during abrasion of annealed aluminium on silicon carbide abrasive papers
JPH05285812A (en) Grinding method
CN108015304A (en) The big face cutting tool of pure aluminum target and its manufacture method and the cutterhead with the cutter
WO1987001065A1 (en) Honing
Coes Chemistry of abrasive action
Lal et al. On the attritious wear of abrasive grains
JP2510464B2 (en) Grinding method for soft metal
Ault Types of grinding Wheels
Rezaei et al. Pulse Dressing in Creep Feed Grinding
KR19990033199U (en) Grinding machine for removing bur and scratch of material made of cast iron, steel and aluminum
Dyer Abrasive belt grinding of metals
Jakobuss et al. Truing of vitrified-bond CBN grinding wheels for high-speed operations
Buttery Metal Finishing Processes
Ahmed et al. Performance of silicon carbide wheels in grinding tool steels
Bianchi et al. The grinding wheel performance in the transverse cylindrical grinding of an Eutetic Alloy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, AND MOR

Free format text: MORTGAGE;ASSIGNORS:UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, A CORP.,;STP CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE.,;UNION CARBIDE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS CO., INC., A CORP. OF PA.,;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:004547/0001

Effective date: 19860106

AS Assignment

Owner name: UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION,

Free format text: RELEASED BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MORGAN BANK (DELAWARE) AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:004665/0131

Effective date: 19860925

AS Assignment

Owner name: UNION CARBIDE INDUSTRIAL GASES TECHNOLOGY CORPORAT

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:UNION CARBIDE INDUSTRIAL GASES INC.;REEL/FRAME:005271/0177

Effective date: 19891220

AS Assignment

Owner name: PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC., CONNECTICUT

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:UNION CARBIDE INDUSTRIAL GASES TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:006337/0037

Effective date: 19920611