[go: up one dir, main page]

US3182018A - Inhibiting corrosion in oil wells - Google Patents

Inhibiting corrosion in oil wells Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3182018A
US3182018A US195337A US19533762A US3182018A US 3182018 A US3182018 A US 3182018A US 195337 A US195337 A US 195337A US 19533762 A US19533762 A US 19533762A US 3182018 A US3182018 A US 3182018A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
brine
ferrocyanide
ion
corrosion
borate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US195337A
Inventor
Joseph F Chittum
Frederic W Schremp
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
California Research LLC
Original Assignee
California Research LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by California Research LLC filed Critical California Research LLC
Priority to US195337A priority Critical patent/US3182018A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3182018A publication Critical patent/US3182018A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F11/00Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent
    • C23F11/08Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids
    • C23F11/18Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids using inorganic inhibitors
    • C23F11/187Mixtures of inorganic inhibitors
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/54Compositions for in situ inhibition of corrosion in boreholes or wells
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B41/00Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
    • E21B41/02Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00 in situ inhibition of corrosion in boreholes or wells
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S507/00Earth boring, well treating, and oil field chemistry
    • Y10S507/939Corrosion inhibitor

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method of inhibiting the corrosion of metal surfaces and pertains particularly to an improved method and composition for inhibiting the corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces in contact with brines produced from an oil well incident to the production of petroleum.
  • the brines formed in subterranean formations are usually highly saline due mainly to dissolved sodium chloride.
  • the brines also usually contain carbon dioxide, both in solution and as a gas.
  • Other substances, such as hydrogen sulfide, may be in the well water in various localities.
  • the brine is therefore a corrosive medium which attacks the metal surfaces with which it comes in contact and often creates an environment wherein metal surfaces are more susceptible to electrochemical and electrolytic corrosion. This susceptibility is especially noticeable in ferrous metal equipment which is exposed to flowing brine or in which the well products are treated or stored during the separation of the crude oil from the brine.
  • the preferred ranges for most effective corrosion inhibition at the minimum total concentration of the respective ions in solution are 7 to 10 0 ppm. of the ferrocyanide ion and at least 10 p.p.m. of the borate ion.
  • the synergistic combination of the Watersoluble ferrocyanide and water-soluble borate is highly effective in inhibiting corrosion due to corrosive oil well brines having moderate contents ofsalts such as sodium chloride together with other corrosion-inducing materials such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide often found in such brines
  • the ferrocyanide-borate treatment forms a Ejfiiifii Fatented May 4, 1965 blue scale in the presence of dissolved ferrous ions in the brine.
  • the ferrous ion content is higher than 5 ppm. and especially above 10 p.p.m., the scale formation sometimes becomes so pronounced as to require that the rods in a pumping well be pulled from the well in order to remove the accumulated scale.
  • the present invention provides a solution for this prob- 1cm.
  • We have found that very effective inhibition of corrosion of metal surfaces in contact with brines containing more than 5 ppm. of ferrous ion can be obtained with the combination of ferrocyanide and borate, while avoiding the scale formation usually associated with this combination in brines having such ferrous ion contents, by also incorporating in the brine a small amount of antimony sulfide.
  • Antimony sulfide is unique in its ability to inhibit formation of scale by ferrocyanides in oil Well brine environments; many agents expected to have iron sequestering properties are not effective enough to prevent such scale formation.
  • the combination of antimony sulfide with the ferrocyanide and borate is very effective in inhibiting sudden stress potential in sucker rods, thereby indicating a reduction in corrosion fatigue and rod-breaking tendency.
  • the ferrocyanide-borate-antimony sulfide combination is especially suited for inhibiting corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces exposed to brines containing more than 5 ppm. of ferrous ion, the combination is very effective for inhibiting corrosion by oil well brines having lesser amounts of dissolved ferrous ion.
  • salt contents above 45% sodium chloride the present combination including antimony sulfide provides effective corrosion control, whereas in such environments, other inhibitors such as the organics and the arsenicals drop off rapidly in their effectiveness.
  • the present combination is effective not only in the presence of highly saline brine but also in the presence of the amounts of hydrogen sulfide which are associated with sour crudes. Hence, the combination is of general utility for inhibiting corrosion in the presence of oil well brines.
  • ferrocyanide coacts with the antimony sulfide in increasing its solubility but also in stabilizing dispersions of antimony sulfide in brines. While antimony sulfide alone is only soluble in a neutral aqueous solution to the extent of about 2 ppm. and in acidic solutions to about 10 p.p.m., the presence of ferrocyanide ion in an amount of 1-10 parts per part of antimony sulfide increases the solubility of antimony sulfide in acidic solutions such as the usual oil field brines to about 12-l5 p.p.m.
  • the ferrocyanide ion stabilizes precipitates of antimony sulfide such as are formed when caustic solutions of antimony sulfide are introduced into a well along with the ferrocyanide and borate.
  • a 10% caustic solution of antimony sulfide, along with ferrocyanide and borate is introduced into a brine to produce concentrations of 5 ppm. of antimony sulfide, 5 p.p.m. of ferroc-yanide ion and 15 ppm.
  • antimony sulfide with the ferrocyanide and borate is a combination having synergistic properties with the antimony sulfide preventing scale formation by the interaction of ferrocyanide with ferrous ions in the oil well brine and with the ferrocyanide plus borate not only increasing the solubility of antimony sulfide in the brine but also stabilizing any undissolved dispersion of antimony sulfide in the brine.
  • the present invention contemplates inhibiting corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces in contact with oil well fluids including crude oil, brine and carbon die oxide by incorporating with said fluids in an intimate mixture prior to the time said fluids contact said ferrous metal surfaces an aqueous caustic solution of antimony sulfide in an amount sufiicient to produce a concentration of 1 to 20 p.p.m. of antimony sulfide in said brine.
  • Another advantage of the antimony sulfide-ferrocyamide-borate inhibiting combination is its ability to reduce sudden stresspotential.
  • the rod stretcher test is based upon the theory that sucker rod breaks result from corrosion fatigue and thatcorrosion fatigue results from the successive growth of a crack under cyclic stress.
  • The, crack grows because applied cyclic stress causes repeated sudden stress above the yield pointat the base of the crack where the lines of force are concentrated.
  • a sudden stress produces a sudden shift in the iron potential in the anodic direction.
  • the shift in the anodic direction causes loss of metallic iron from the base of the crack.
  • Inhibitors that suppress the sudden stress potential of a jrod will thereby'suppress the growthof a corrosion fatigue crack and thus the incidence of rodbreaks.
  • the rod stretcher test for measuring the sudden stress potential for carbon magnesium steel in a brine containing 3% sodium chloride as influenced by added inhibitors is carried out as follows: A heavy iron beam is pivoted at a point located at-nine-tenths of its total length. The long lever arm of the beam is attached to a cylinder provided with a plunger attached to the base of the apparatus and with means for increasing the pressure within the, cylinder. A
  • pony rod is fastened between the end of the short lever arm of the beam and thebase of the apparatus.
  • a Lucite cell or chamber is fastened around the pony 'rod to form a cup surrounding the rod.
  • Positioned in the cell is a short section of a rod as a reference.
  • the test liquid under investigation is placed in the cell and is in contact with the pony rod and vertically held reference rod.
  • a known pressure in the cylinder under the plunger for a short time, the short arm of the beam is moved upward, thus stretching the pony rod.
  • the potential change between the pony rod and the reference rod that exists in the short period of'stress is measured by.means of an oscilloscope. Pictures are taken. of the oscilloscope signals.
  • the load that is put on the, pony rod is calculated from V the known surface area of the plunger, the known applied pressure and the length of the lever arms of the beam.
  • a load is applied momentarily, about 2 seconds usually being sufficient, to the pony rod.
  • the load is about that which'reaches the yield point of the rod, i.e., about 50,000 psi. for ordinary carbon steel rods.
  • the signal on the oscilloscope reaches a peak heightfindicative of the sudden stress potential or transient.
  • the inhibition' of sudden stress potential due to the additives is calculated ,(CFIQ as a in terms of corrosion fatigue inhibition follows? CFIQJMEgIJAigA where S is the signal height above the base line with brine without inhibitor added, and S is the signal height with brine with the inhibitor added.
  • sodium ferrocyanide and sodium tetraborate were added to produce in the brine concentrations of 20 p.p.m. of ferrocyanide and 50 p.p.m'. of borateion.
  • antimony sulfide in a 10% sodium hydroxide solution was also added to produce a concentration of 20 p.p.m. of antimony sulfide in the brine.
  • a concentration of 320% of caustic is suificient to increase substantially the amount of antimony sulfide that can be stably dispersed in the aqueous medium.
  • an inhibitor composition of general utility with maximum concentration of active ingredients is that composed ofgwater-soluble ferrocyanide, water-soluble borate, antimony sulfide and caustic in the above proportion to the amount of antimony sulfide.
  • concentration of'ferrocyanidc'ion in the brine can be somewhat lessthan that specified in our copending application Serial No'. 159,814, and can be as low as 1 -2 p.p.m. so long as there is a complementary amount of antimony sulfide to make up to a total of at least 3 p.p.m., and
  • the concentration for'each of theferrocyanide ion and borate ion is at least 5 p.p.m. with 140* p.p.m. usually being the upper limit.
  • the concentration, of dispersed antimony sulfide can range from 0.1 p.p.m., preferably from 1 p.p.m. to-about' 50 p.p.m. although usually no more-than 10 p.p.m. of, antimony sulfide is required.
  • suificient quantities of a watersoluble ferrocyanide and antimony sulfide usually in caustic solution are introduced into the well fluids to produce in the brine a concentration of ferrocyanide ion of at least 3 p.p.m. and a concentration of antimony sulfide of at least 0.1 p.p.m. If the well brine is lacking in borate, or if the concentration of borate ion is below that desired, then a water-soluble borate is also introduced to bring the borate ion concentration at least to 5 p.p.m.
  • This test solution was made from tap Water to which was added 3% by weight of sodium chloride and suificient ferrous chloride to give a ferrous ion content of 10 p.p.m.
  • the solution was saturated with carbon dioxide and contained gaseous bubbles of this substance.
  • the acidity of the test solution ranged from a pH of 5.5 to 5.7 and being maintained at this pH by bubbling CO into the solution.
  • the solution was agitated by mechanical means in the region of the test specimen to cause a current of solution together with the entrapped CO gas to impinge on and flow over the surface of the specimen.
  • the solution was circulated through the test chamher at the rate of 50 cc. per minute and was maintained at a temperature of 72 C.
  • the base rate of corrosion of the test specimen was established by running the brine through the test cell Without any corrosion inhibitor being added to it. Subsequently an aqueous solution of the material to be tested for corrosion-inhibiting qualities was pumped continuously into the test cell at a measured rate and intimately mixed with the brine to produce the desired concentration of inhibitor in the brine as measured in the efiluent from the test cell.
  • an aqueous solution of the material to be tested for corrosion-inhibiting qualities was pumped continuously into the test cell at a measured rate and intimately mixed with the brine to produce the desired concentration of inhibitor in the brine as measured in the efiluent from the test cell.
  • S is the base rate of corrosion of the test specimen, S is the rate of corrosion four hours after starting injection of the inhibiting agent into the brine.
  • the presence of antimony sulfide in the inhibiting composition not only decreases the formation of scale from the ferrocyanide reacting with the dissolved ferrous ions but also increases the, corrosion inhibition.
  • ferrocyanide ion 15 p.p.m. borate ion and 5 p.p.m. antimony sulfide.
  • Table IV Iron count (p.p.m. ferrous ion): Percent inhibition 0 10 -Q. 92 25 90 50 86
  • the present inhibitor combination is eifective in inhibiting corrosion in the presence of hydrogen sulfide as shown in the following test results obtained as above with a 3% sodium chloride brine containing 20 p.p.m. sulfide ion (which is comparable to sour crude brines).
  • the sulfide ion was added as potassium sulfide.
  • the test specimens were 1020 plain carbon steel and in one test, the brine was treated to contain 5 p.p.m. ferrocyanide ion, 15 p.p.m.
  • a concentrated mixture of the antimony sulfide and ferrocyanide and borate ions in solution may be prepared and injected into the well to provide v corrosion inhibition, either continuously at a measured rate or by batch treatment.
  • the amount of concentrated solution placed in the well is controlled to produce the desired level of concentration of the compo: mentions in the well fluidsI
  • a concentrated solution suitable for treating a well producing 100 barrels of brine a day may be made of the following proportions of components:
  • This composition when introducedinto the oil well con- -tinuously over a seven-day period will give a continuous concentration in solution of approximately 15 p.p.m. ,of antimony trisulfide,j15 p.p.m. of ferrocyanide ion and 55 p.p.m. of borate ion'and will effectively inhibit corrosion of the ferrous metal surfaces exposed to the corrosive well fluid.
  • This same proportion of components present in 100 barrels ofbrine may, of course, be used to inhibit effectively the corrosion of the walls of tanks or vessels in which well fluids are processed or stored. This same proportion of components, reduced or increased in quantity in accordance with the volume of brine to be inhibited,
  • nents in solution prior to the time they are introduced into the well fluids. It is possible, of course, to introduce these components into an oil well in solid form either singly or as a mixture and permit the solution to take place directly in the well fluids.
  • the dry mixture of components may beintroduced into the well in the form of pellets or sticks which may be weighted to sink to the bottom of the well where they will go into the solution.
  • a solid stick can be formed by 'melting sodium tetraborate decahydrate and stirring into the 'melt powdered sodium ferrocyanide and antimony sulfide'until a homogeneous dispersion is obtained and then allowing the'melt to solidify.
  • the inhibiting mixture thus will be created in the lowermost portion of the apparatus which it is designed to protect, and its inhibiting action will be effective throughout all of the portions of the well and the apparatus associated therewith to which it is carried by the well fluids.
  • This technique of introducing a dry mixture of the components into a corrosive fluid whose action it .will inhibit is alsoapplicable to flow lines, tanks and such other apparatus. 7
  • this invention provides a method and compositions for protecting metal surfaces from the action of corrosive fluids by intermixing in solution in 7 these fluids relatively low concentrations of antimony sulfide most effectively with ferrocyanide and borate ions forutility in the presence of brineslof high salinity, fer- 'rous ion content, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide.
  • provernent for inhibiting said corrosion comprises. also incorporating in said brine antimony trisulfide, in an 7 amount sufficient to reduce substantially the tendency of v ferrocyanide scale to be produced, andsaid amount being from 0.1to p.p.ml g V 2.
  • the method of inhibiting corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces in contact with an oil field brine containing 10 to p.p.m. of ferrous ion which method comprises incorporating in said brine a water-soluble ferrocyanide and a water-soluble borate in amounts sufficient to produce in solution 5 to p.p.m. of each of ferrocyanide and borate ions together.
  • a corrosion-inhibiting composition consisting essentially of a water-soluble ferrocyanide in an amount sufficient to produce in an aqueous solution a concentration of 5 p.p.m. to l40'p.p.m. offerrocyanide ion, awatersoluble borate in an amount suflicient to produce a concentration of 5 p.p.m. to 140 p.p.m. and antimony sulfide in an amount sufficient to produce a concentration of 0.1 to .20 p.p.m. of the sulfide.
  • a corrosion-inhibiting composition consisting essentially of a water-soluble ferrocyanide in an'amount sufficient to produce in an aqueous solution a concentration of 5 to 140 p.p.m. of ferrocyanide ion, a water-soluble borate in an amount sufficient to produce a concentration of 5 p.p.m. to 140 p.p.m. and a caustic solution of antimony sulfide in an amount suflicient to produce a concentration 0.1 to 20 p.p.m. of the sulfide.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Preventing Corrosion Or Incrustation Of Metals (AREA)

Description

United States Patent 3,182,018 INHIBITING CORROSEON 1N OIL WELLS;
Joseph F. Chittum, Whittier, and Frederic W. Schrernp,
lhlllerton, Calif., assignors to California Research (Zorporation, San Francisco, Calif., a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Filed May 16, 1962, Ser. No. 195,337
6 Claims. (Cl. 252-855) This invention relates to a method of inhibiting the corrosion of metal surfaces and pertains particularly to an improved method and composition for inhibiting the corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces in contact with brines produced from an oil well incident to the production of petroleum.
The brines formed in subterranean formations are usually highly saline due mainly to dissolved sodium chloride. The brines also usually contain carbon dioxide, both in solution and as a gas. Other substances, such as hydrogen sulfide, may be in the well water in various localities. The brine is therefore a corrosive medium which attacks the metal surfaces with which it comes in contact and often creates an environment wherein metal surfaces are more susceptible to electrochemical and electrolytic corrosion. This susceptibility is especially noticeable in ferrous metal equipment which is exposed to flowing brine or in which the well products are treated or stored during the separation of the crude oil from the brine.
It will be appreciated that many factors contribute to the corrosive environment found in oil wells. Such factors include not only the composition of the brine, some components of which have been mentioned above, but also temperature conditions, the velocity of fluid flow through or over the well apparatus, the amount of oxygen and carbon dioxide available to contribute to the corrosive conditions, cyclic stress in pumping equipment, particular components of the crude oil and other factors, some of which are still unknown. As a result, the development of corrosion inhibitors for oil field use has been done largely on an empirical basis, since it has been found that inhibitors which may be effective under conditions of other industrial usage are not always effective in oil wells.
The problem of protecting the ferrous metal equipment such as the tubing, rods and pumps in pumping wells and the casing and tubing in flowing wells has received a great deal of attention in oil field practice.
As described in our copending application, Serial No. 159,814, filed December l, 1961, now US. Patent No. 3,127,932, issued April 7, 1964, corrosion of metal surfaces exposed to corrosive well fluids is very effectively inhibited by bringing together in the well brine a mixture of a ferrocyanide ion and a borate ion, both in aqueous solution and each in a concentration of at least ppm. The combination gives a synergistic effect in inhibiting corrosion in oil well applications with relatively low concentrations of the inhibiting components of the corrosive fluids. Effective corrosion inhibition can be obtained with sufficient water-soluble ferrocyanides and water-soluble borates to give concentrations of 5 to 140 ppm. for each of the ferrocyanide ion and borate ion. The preferred ranges for most effective corrosion inhibition at the minimum total concentration of the respective ions in solution are 7 to 10 0 ppm. of the ferrocyanide ion and at least 10 p.p.m. of the borate ion.
Although the synergistic combination of the Watersoluble ferrocyanide and water-soluble borate is highly effective in inhibiting corrosion due to corrosive oil well brines having moderate contents ofsalts such as sodium chloride together with other corrosion-inducing materials such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide often found in such brines, the ferrocyanide-borate treatment forms a Ejfiiifii Fatented May 4, 1965 blue scale in the presence of dissolved ferrous ions in the brine. When the ferrous ion content is higher than 5 ppm. and especially above 10 p.p.m., the scale formation sometimes becomes so pronounced as to require that the rods in a pumping well be pulled from the well in order to remove the accumulated scale.
The present invention provides a solution for this prob- 1cm. We have found that very effective inhibition of corrosion of metal surfaces in contact with brines containing more than 5 ppm. of ferrous ion can be obtained with the combination of ferrocyanide and borate, while avoiding the scale formation usually associated with this combination in brines having such ferrous ion contents, by also incorporating in the brine a small amount of antimony sulfide. Antimony sulfide is unique in its ability to inhibit formation of scale by ferrocyanides in oil Well brine environments; many agents expected to have iron sequestering properties are not effective enough to prevent such scale formation. We have also found that the combination of antimony sulfide with the ferrocyanide and borate is very effective in inhibiting sudden stress potential in sucker rods, thereby indicating a reduction in corrosion fatigue and rod-breaking tendency. While the ferrocyanide-borate-antimony sulfide combination is especially suited for inhibiting corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces exposed to brines containing more than 5 ppm. of ferrous ion, the combination is very effective for inhibiting corrosion by oil well brines having lesser amounts of dissolved ferrous ion. With salt contents above 45% sodium chloride, the present combination including antimony sulfide provides effective corrosion control, whereas in such environments, other inhibitors such as the organics and the arsenicals drop off rapidly in their effectiveness. The present combination is effective not only in the presence of highly saline brine but also in the presence of the amounts of hydrogen sulfide which are associated with sour crudes. Hence, the combination is of general utility for inhibiting corrosion in the presence of oil well brines.
Furthermore, we have found that the ferrocyanide coacts with the antimony sulfide in increasing its solubility but also in stabilizing dispersions of antimony sulfide in brines. While antimony sulfide alone is only soluble in a neutral aqueous solution to the extent of about 2 ppm. and in acidic solutions to about 10 p.p.m., the presence of ferrocyanide ion in an amount of 1-10 parts per part of antimony sulfide increases the solubility of antimony sulfide in acidic solutions such as the usual oil field brines to about 12-l5 p.p.m. Additionally, the ferrocyanide ion stabilizes precipitates of antimony sulfide such as are formed when caustic solutions of antimony sulfide are introduced into a well along with the ferrocyanide and borate. For example, when a 10% caustic solution of antimony sulfide, along with ferrocyanide and borate, is introduced into a brine to produce concentrations of 5 ppm. of antimony sulfide, 5 p.p.m. of ferroc-yanide ion and 15 ppm. of borate ion and the brine is acidified to a pH of 5.5 with carbon dioxide, a dark orange dispersion of antimony trisulfide is formed but remains stably dispersed in the presence of the ferrocyanide and borate ions. Thus, antimony sulfide with the ferrocyanide and borate is a combination having synergistic properties with the antimony sulfide preventing scale formation by the interaction of ferrocyanide with ferrous ions in the oil well brine and with the ferrocyanide plus borate not only increasing the solubility of antimony sulfide in the brine but also stabilizing any undissolved dispersion of antimony sulfide in the brine. Further the present invention contemplates inhibiting corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces in contact with oil well fluids including crude oil, brine and carbon die oxide by incorporating with said fluids in an intimate mixture prior to the time said fluids contact said ferrous metal surfaces an aqueous caustic solution of antimony sulfide in an amount sufiicient to produce a concentration of 1 to 20 p.p.m. of antimony sulfide in said brine.
As indicated above, the addition of antimony sulfide greatly reduces the tendency of ferrocyanide-borate to form undesirable scale in oil wells. Tests illustrating this property were carried out as follows: an oilwell brine containing 3% sodium chloride and 10' p.p.m. of ferrous ions (added. for test purposes as ferrou'schloride) at well temperatures (i.e., about 160 F.) was pumped for 1 hour througha glass apparatus simulating .a'well pump and containing fourlglass check valves on which the ferrocyanide scale is deposited. The relative amounts of scale are 'determined by'the gain in weight of the check valves.
In" the comparative tests the brinewas treated with sufficient sodium ferrocyanideand sodium tetraborate to produce inthe brine. a concentration of 20 p.p.m. of ferrocyanide? ion and'50 p.p.m. of borate ion calculated as B with and without the addition of various amounts of anti- .mony trisulfide in aqueous sodium hydroxide solution. 'All solutions were saturated with CO to a pH of 5.5. The results of the series of tests are given in the following table.
V 7 Table l Amount'of Sb S added Amount of scale "to brine (p.p.m.): formed (mg.) f 0 25.9 1 13.6
The above data indicate the effectiveness of antimony sulfide in reducing the tendency of ferrocyanide-borate to form scale in the presence of ferrous ions in brine.
Another advantage of the antimony sulfide-ferrocyamide-borate inhibiting combination is its ability to reduce sudden stresspotential. The rod stretcher test is based upon the theory that sucker rod breaks result from corrosion fatigue and thatcorrosion fatigue results from the successive growth of a crack under cyclic stress. The, crack grows because applied cyclic stress causes repeated sudden stress above the yield pointat the base of the crack where the lines of force are concentrated. A sudden stress produces a sudden shift in the iron potential in the anodic direction. The shift in the anodic direction causes loss of metallic iron from the base of the crack. Inhibitors that suppress the sudden stress potential of a jrod will thereby'suppress the growthof a corrosion fatigue crack and thus the incidence of rodbreaks. The rod stretcher test for measuring the sudden stress potential for carbon magnesium steel in a brine containing 3% sodium chloride as influenced by added inhibitors is carried out as follows: A heavy iron beam is pivoted at a point located at-nine-tenths of its total length. The long lever arm of the beam is attached to a cylinder provided with a plunger attached to the base of the apparatus and with means for increasing the pressure within the, cylinder. A
pony rod is fastened between the end of the short lever arm of the beam and thebase of the apparatus. A Lucite cell or chamber is fastened around the pony 'rod to form a cup surrounding the rod. Positioned in the cell is a short section of a rod as a reference. The test liquid under investigation is placed in the cell and is in contact with the pony rod and vertically held reference rod. By applying a known pressure in the cylinder under the plunger for a short time, the short arm of the beam is moved upward, thus stretching the pony rod. The potential change between the pony rod and the reference rod that exists in the short period of'stress is measured by.means of an oscilloscope. Pictures are taken. of the oscilloscope signals. The load that is put on the, pony rod is calculated from V the known surface area of the plunger, the known applied pressure and the length of the lever arms of the beam.
In the test, a load is applied momentarily, about 2 seconds usually being sufficient, to the pony rod. The load is about that which'reaches the yield point of the rod, i.e., about 50,000 psi. for ordinary carbon steel rods. During the application of the load, the signal on the oscilloscope reaches a peak heightfindicative of the sudden stress potential or transient. The inhibition' of sudden stress potential due to the additives is calculated ,(CFIQ as a in terms of corrosion fatigue inhibition follows? CFIQJMEgIJAigA where S is the signal height above the base line with brine without inhibitor added, and S is the signal height with brine with the inhibitor added. In one case, sodium ferrocyanide and sodium tetraborate were added to produce in the brine concentrations of 20 p.p.m. of ferrocyanide and 50 p.p.m'. of borateion. In another case for comparative purposes, antimony sulfide in a 10% sodium hydroxide solution was also added to produce a concentration of 20 p.p.m. of antimony sulfide in the brine. The results of the tests above were as follows:
Table ll Inhibition of corrosion fatigue, percent Without Sb S 30-40 With Sb S 82-85 The abovefdata show that the addition. of antimony sul- "fide more than doubled the inhibition of corrosionfatigue sulfide can be introduced (no hydrogen sulfide being.
formed) and with the proportionate amounts, as specified elsewhere herein, of ferrocyanide and borate, the
amount is increased to about 6-7%. Thus; the combination of antimony sulfide in caustic solution'with ferrocyanide and borate givesa more concentrated solution of active ingredients suitable for use in treating oil wells.
Usually a concentration of 320% of caustic is suificient to increase substantially the amount of antimony sulfide that can be stably dispersed in the aqueous medium. By
far, most preferable for an inhibitor composition of general utility with maximum concentration of active ingredients is that composed ofgwater-soluble ferrocyanide, water-soluble borate, antimony sulfide and caustic in the above proportion to the amount of antimony sulfide. The concentration of'ferrocyanidc'ion in the brine can be somewhat lessthan that specified in our copending application Serial No'. 159,814, and can be as low as 1 -2 p.p.m. so long as there is a complementary amount of antimony sulfide to make up to a total of at least 3 p.p.m., and
- preferably at least 5 p.p.m. However, usually the concentration for'each of theferrocyanide ion and borate ion is at least 5 p.p.m. with 140* p.p.m. usually being the upper limit. The preferred ranges at the minimum total concentration of the respective ions in solutionare 7 to p.p.m. of the ferrocyanide ion and at least 10 p.p.m. of the. borate ion. The concentration, of dispersed antimony sulfide can range from 0.1 p.p.m., preferably from 1 p.p.m. to-about' 50 p.p.m. although usually no more-than 10 p.p.m. of, antimony sulfide is required.
Generally, 2 to 20 parts of antimony sulfide per 20 parts of ferrocyanide suffice, although with the lower amounts of ferrocyanide, larger proportions such as 2 to 5 parts of antimony sulfide per part of ferrocyanide are used.
In those instances where the well brine naturally contains a borate in solution, then in accordance with the method of this invention, suificient quantities of a watersoluble ferrocyanide and antimony sulfide usually in caustic solution are introduced into the well fluids to produce in the brine a concentration of ferrocyanide ion of at least 3 p.p.m. and a concentration of antimony sulfide of at least 0.1 p.p.m. If the well brine is lacking in borate, or if the concentration of borate ion is below that desired, then a water-soluble borate is also introduced to bring the borate ion concentration at least to 5 p.p.m.
The following tests in a brine containing p.p.m. of ferrous ion illustrate the effectiveness of various combinations of antimony sulfide and a mixture of sodium ferrocyanide and sodium tetraborate in a proportion of 14 parts of ferrocyanide ion and 56 parts of borate ion calculated as B0 In each test there was introduced into the brine sufiicient of the antimony sulfide and the ferrocyanide-borate mixture to give a total of 12 p.p.m. of antimony sulfide plus ferrocyanide ion. The test employed an apparatus in which a test specimen made of SAE 1020 mild steel was submerged in an aqueous solution made to simulate an average corrosive oil well brine. This test solution was made from tap Water to which was added 3% by weight of sodium chloride and suificient ferrous chloride to give a ferrous ion content of 10 p.p.m. The solution was saturated with carbon dioxide and contained gaseous bubbles of this substance. During the tests, the acidity of the test solution ranged from a pH of 5.5 to 5.7 and being maintained at this pH by bubbling CO into the solution. The solution was agitated by mechanical means in the region of the test specimen to cause a current of solution together with the entrapped CO gas to impinge on and flow over the surface of the specimen. The solution was circulated through the test chamher at the rate of 50 cc. per minute and was maintained at a temperature of 72 C.
The base rate of corrosion of the test specimen was established by running the brine through the test cell Without any corrosion inhibitor being added to it. Subsequently an aqueous solution of the material to be tested for corrosion-inhibiting qualities was pumped continuously into the test cell at a measured rate and intimately mixed with the brine to produce the desired concentration of inhibitor in the brine as measured in the efiluent from the test cell. Thus, by selecting the material to be injected into the test cell and controlling its concentration in the brine solution from test to test, the effects of the antimony sulfide and the ferrocyanide-borate mixture separated from each other and the effects obtained by having these agents present simultaneously in the solution were obtained.
The effects of the agents added to the brine were measured by determining the change in the electrical resistance of the test specimen due to corrosion of its surface. A recording-type, self-balancing potentiometer was used to continuously record the changes in resistance during the test. The corrosion-inhibiting effects of the agents in solution are recorded in terms of percent inhibition. This percentage is derived from the relationship 1 OO(S,,-S a. where:
S is the base rate of corrosion of the test specimen, S is the rate of corrosion four hours after starting injection of the inhibiting agent into the brine.
Table III SbzSg (p.p.m.) Ferroeyanide Percent ion (p.p.m.) Inhibition The data illustrate that the presence of ferrous ion has a substantial deleterious effect on the corrosion inhibiting properties of the ferrocyanide-borate mixtures and that antimony sulfide in combination with the ferrocyanideborate mixture is effective to inhibit corrosion substantially.
In each of the tests described above, a very adherent and tough film of noncorrosive material was promptly deposited in the ferrous metal surfaces of the test specimens. The persistence of the film produced on the test specimen after stopping the injection of the additives into the brine of the test cell indicated a continuing type of protection.
As illustrated by the data in Tables I and III above, the presence of antimony sulfide in the inhibiting composition not only decreases the formation of scale from the ferrocyanide reacting with the dissolved ferrous ions but also increases the, corrosion inhibition.
While the present combination of active components is especially efiective for inhibiting scale formation from the ferrocyanide in the presence of ferrous ions in the brine, the following test shows that the effectiveness of such combination is largely independent of the iron content in the brine. These tests were carried out substantially as described above for those tests reported in Table III, but with varying contents of ferrous ion in a 3% sodium chloride brine and concentrations of 5 p.p.m.
ferrocyanide ion, 15 p.p.m. borate ion and 5 p.p.m. antimony sulfide.
Table IV Iron count (p.p.m. ferrous ion): Percent inhibition 0 10 -Q. 92 25 90 50 86 Further, the present inhibitor combination is eifective in inhibiting corrosion in the presence of hydrogen sulfide as shown in the following test results obtained as above with a 3% sodium chloride brine containing 20 p.p.m. sulfide ion (which is comparable to sour crude brines). For purposes of the test, the sulfide ion was added as potassium sulfide. The test specimens were 1020 plain carbon steel and in one test, the brine was treated to contain 5 p.p.m. ferrocyanide ion, 15 p.p.m. borate ion and 5 p.p.m. antimony sulfide, and in another test the brine was treated with 10 p.p.m. ferrocyanide ion and 30 p.p.m. borate ion. The results are given in the following table.
Table V Inhibitor composition: Percent inhibition Sb S +ferrocyanide+borate 79 Ferrocyanide-l-borate 40 Another desirable property of the present inhibitor combination is that it tends to inhibit emulsion formation, whereas dichrornate, which sometimes is used as a corrosion inhibitor, has a strong emulsifying tendency. This distinction was found with an Inglewood crude oil which is known to emulsify in brine easily. The emulsion-inhibiting property of the present inhibit-or combination is important since any inhibitor agent which promotes the formation of emulsion has limited usefulness.
7 In carrying out the treatment of afwell in accordance with the present invention, a concentrated mixture of the antimony sulfide and ferrocyanide and borate ions in solution may be prepared and injected into the well to provide v corrosion inhibition, either continuously at a measured rate or by batch treatment. In either casethe amount of concentrated solution placed in the well is controlled to produce the desired level of concentration of the compo: mentions in the well fluidsI For, example, a concentrated solution suitable for treating a well producing 100 barrels of brine a day may be made of the following proportions of components:
Sodium hydroxide lbs 3.0 sodiumferrocy'anidelbs 8.6 Sodium tetraborate lbs 22.3 Water "gals" .200
This composition when introducedinto the oil well con- -tinuously over a seven-day period will give a continuous concentration in solution of approximately 15 p.p.m. ,of antimony trisulfide,j15 p.p.m. of ferrocyanide ion and 55 p.p.m. of borate ion'and will effectively inhibit corrosion of the ferrous metal surfaces exposed to the corrosive well fluid. This same proportion of components present in 100 barrels ofbrine may, of course, be used to inhibit effectively the corrosion of the walls of tanks or vessels in which well fluids are processed or stored. This same proportion of components, reduced or increased in quantity in accordance with the volume of brine to be inhibited,
. nents in solutionprior to the time they are introduced into the well fluids. It is possible, of course, to introduce these components into an oil well in solid form either singly or as a mixture and permit the solution to take place directly in the well fluids. Thus, the dry mixture of components may beintroduced into the well in the form of pellets or sticks which may be weighted to sink to the bottom of the well where they will go into the solution. For example, a solid stick can be formed by 'melting sodium tetraborate decahydrate and stirring into the 'melt powdered sodium ferrocyanide and antimony sulfide'until a homogeneous dispersion is obtained and then allowing the'melt to solidify. The inhibiting mixture thus will be created in the lowermost portion of the apparatus which it is designed to protect, and its inhibiting action will be effective throughout all of the portions of the well and the apparatus associated therewith to which it is carried by the well fluids. This technique of introducing a dry mixture of the components into a corrosive fluid whose action it .will inhibit is alsoapplicable to flow lines, tanks and such other apparatus. 7
As illustrated above, this invention provides a method and compositions for protecting metal surfaces from the action of corrosive fluids by intermixing in solution in 7 these fluids relatively low concentrations of antimony sulfide most effectively with ferrocyanide and borate ions forutility in the presence of brineslof high salinity, fer- 'rous ion content, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide.
Particularly, the method and composition of this invention are effective when employed with oilfield brines to inhibit the corrosion of the ferrous metal apparatus with V which the brines come in contact. 7 2 It is'apparent that many modifications and variations of this invention may be made without departing from the inventive concept. The foregoing examples are presented by Way of illustration of the several embodiments of the invention, and it is not intended that they be interpreted as limitations ofthe scope of the appended claims.
We'claim: r 1
1. In the method of inhibiting corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces in contact with an oil field brine containing at least 5 p.p.m. of ferrous ion which comprises incorporating in said brine a Water-soluble ferrocyanide in an amount sufficient to produce in solution in said brine a concentration of 5 to 140 p.p.m. of ferrocyanide ion and a water-soluble borate in an amount sufficient to produce a concentration of 5 to 140 p.p.m. of borate ion, the im:
provernent for inhibiting said corrosion which comprises. also incorporating in said brine antimony trisulfide, in an 7 amount sufficient to reduce substantially the tendency of v ferrocyanide scale to be produced, andsaid amount being from 0.1to p.p.ml g V 2. The method of inhibiting corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces in contact with an oil field brine containing 10 to p.p.m. of ferrous ion, which method comprises incorporating in said brine a water-soluble ferrocyanide and a water-soluble borate in amounts sufficient to produce in solution 5 to p.p.m. of each of ferrocyanide and borate ions together. with a caustic solution of at least one antimony trisulfide in an amount to produce in solution antimony trisulfide in a concentration of l to) p.p.m. for each 10 p.p.m. of ferrocyanide ion.
3. The method of inhibiting corrosion of ferrous metal surfaces exposed to oil well fluids including crude oil, brine, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide and charac V teri'zed by a pH above'5 .0 which comprisesincorporating with said fluids inan intimate mixture prior to the time I said fluids contact said ferrous metalsurfaces an aqueous solution of ferrocyanide in an amount to produce a concentration of ferrocyanide ion in said fluids in the range of 5 p.p.m. to 140 p.p.m., an aqueous solution of a watersoluble borate in an amount to produce a concentration of borate ion in said fluids of not less than 5 p.p.m. and
an aqueous caustic solution'of antimony trisulfide in an amount to produce a concentration thereof in said fluids of 0.1 to 15 p.p.m; V
4. A corrosion-inhibiting composition consisting essentially of a water-soluble ferrocyanide in an amount sufficient to produce in an aqueous solution a concentration of 5 p.p.m. to l40'p.p.m. offerrocyanide ion, awatersoluble borate in an amount suflicient to produce a concentration of 5 p.p.m. to 140 p.p.m. and antimony sulfide in an amount sufficient to produce a concentration of 0.1 to .20 p.p.m. of the sulfide.
5. A corrosion-inhibiting composition consisting essentially of a water-soluble ferrocyanide in an'amount sufficient to produce in an aqueous solution a concentration of 5 to 140 p.p.m. of ferrocyanide ion, a water-soluble borate in an amount sufficient to produce a concentration of 5 p.p.m. to 140 p.p.m. and a caustic solution of antimony sulfide in an amount suflicient to produce a concentration 0.1 to 20 p.p.m. of the sulfide.
6. The method of inhibiting corrosion of ferrous metal apparatus in anoil well containing fluids comprising crude References (Zited by theExaminer UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,827,223 10/31 Dennis 252-387 7 1,875,982 a 9/32 Boller 252-387 2,801,697 8/37 Rohrback 1661 3,127,932 4/64 Schremp et'al. 252- 387 JULIUS GREENWALD, Primary Examiner.

Claims (1)

1. IN THE METHOD OF INHIBITING CORROSION OF FERROUS METAL SURFACES IN CONTACT WITH AN OIL FIELD BRINE CONTAINING AT LEAST 5 P.P.M. OF FERROUS ION WHICH COMPRISES INCORPORATING IN SAID BRINE A WATER-SOLUBLE FERROCYANIDE IN AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO PRODUCE IN SOLUTION IN SAID BRINE A CONCENTRATION OF 5 TO 140 P.P.M. OF BORATE ION, THE IMPROVEMENT FOR INHIBITING SAID CORROSION WHICH COMPRISES ALSO INCORPORATING IN SAID BRINE ANTIMONY TRISULFIDE IN AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO REDUCE SUBSTANTIALLY THE TENDENCY OF FERROCYANIDE SCALE TO BE PRODUCED, AND SAID AMOUNT BEING FROM 0.1 TO 50 P.P.M.
US195337A 1962-05-16 1962-05-16 Inhibiting corrosion in oil wells Expired - Lifetime US3182018A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US195337A US3182018A (en) 1962-05-16 1962-05-16 Inhibiting corrosion in oil wells

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US195337A US3182018A (en) 1962-05-16 1962-05-16 Inhibiting corrosion in oil wells

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3182018A true US3182018A (en) 1965-05-04

Family

ID=22721031

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US195337A Expired - Lifetime US3182018A (en) 1962-05-16 1962-05-16 Inhibiting corrosion in oil wells

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3182018A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3257316A (en) * 1965-02-23 1966-06-21 Monsanto Co Corrosion-inhibited phosphate solutions and compositions useful for manufacturing them
US20030041778A1 (en) * 2001-08-23 2003-03-06 Zaid Gene H. Well treatment composition for use in iron-rich environments
US20030143865A1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2003-07-31 International Business Machines Corporation Ultralow dielectric constant material as an intralevel or interlevel dielectric in a semiconductor device and electronic device made
US6620341B1 (en) * 1999-12-23 2003-09-16 Fmc Corporation Corrosion inhibitors for use in oil and gas wells and similar applications
US20100307752A1 (en) * 2009-06-05 2010-12-09 Kroff Well Services, Inc. Fluid Treatment Systems, Compositions and Methods for Metal Ion Stabilization in Aqueous Solutions and/or Enhanced Fluid Performance

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1827223A (en) * 1928-02-02 1931-10-13 Clark M Dennis Treatment of iron and steel
US1875982A (en) * 1931-08-15 1932-09-06 Du Pont Prevention of corrosion
US2801697A (en) * 1953-08-03 1957-08-06 Crest Res Lab Inc Methods and means for introducing corrosion inhibitors into oil wells
US3127932A (en) * 1961-12-01 1964-04-07 California Research Corp Composition and method for inhibiting corrosion in oil wells

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1827223A (en) * 1928-02-02 1931-10-13 Clark M Dennis Treatment of iron and steel
US1875982A (en) * 1931-08-15 1932-09-06 Du Pont Prevention of corrosion
US2801697A (en) * 1953-08-03 1957-08-06 Crest Res Lab Inc Methods and means for introducing corrosion inhibitors into oil wells
US3127932A (en) * 1961-12-01 1964-04-07 California Research Corp Composition and method for inhibiting corrosion in oil wells

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3257316A (en) * 1965-02-23 1966-06-21 Monsanto Co Corrosion-inhibited phosphate solutions and compositions useful for manufacturing them
US6620341B1 (en) * 1999-12-23 2003-09-16 Fmc Corporation Corrosion inhibitors for use in oil and gas wells and similar applications
US20030143865A1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2003-07-31 International Business Machines Corporation Ultralow dielectric constant material as an intralevel or interlevel dielectric in a semiconductor device and electronic device made
US20030041778A1 (en) * 2001-08-23 2003-03-06 Zaid Gene H. Well treatment composition for use in iron-rich environments
US6720291B2 (en) * 2001-08-23 2004-04-13 Jacam Chemicals, L.L.C. Well treatment composition for use in iron-rich environments
US20100311618A1 (en) * 2009-06-05 2010-12-09 Kroff Well Services, Inc. Fluid Treatment Systems, Compositions and Methods for Metal Ion Stabilization in Aqueous Solutions and/or Enhanced Fluid Performance
US20100307752A1 (en) * 2009-06-05 2010-12-09 Kroff Well Services, Inc. Fluid Treatment Systems, Compositions and Methods for Metal Ion Stabilization in Aqueous Solutions and/or Enhanced Fluid Performance
US20100311623A1 (en) * 2009-06-05 2010-12-09 Kroff Well Services, Inc. Fluid Treatment Systems, Compositions and Methods for Metal Ion Stabilization in Aqueous Solutions
US20100307753A1 (en) * 2009-06-05 2010-12-09 Kroff Well Services, Inc. Methods of Treating Flowback Water
US8871691B2 (en) 2009-06-05 2014-10-28 Kroff Chemical Company Methods of treating flowback water
US8940667B2 (en) * 2009-06-05 2015-01-27 Kroff Chemical Company Fluid treatment systems, compositions and methods for metal ion stabilization in aqueous solutions and/or enhanced fluid performance
US9034804B2 (en) * 2009-06-05 2015-05-19 Kroff Chemical Company Fluid treatment systems, compositions and methods for metal ion stabilization in aqueous solutions and/or enhanced fluid performance
US9034805B2 (en) 2009-06-05 2015-05-19 Kroff Chemical Company Fluid treatment systems, compositions and methods for metal ion stabilization in aqueous solutions

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Charles et al. Generation of stress corrosion cracking environments at pipeline surfaces
CA1130552A (en) Bromides of zinc and calcium for well completion
US3301323A (en) Control of drilling fluid properties
Jenning Jr A study of caustic solution-crude oil interfacial tensions
US2426318A (en) Inhibiting corrosion
US2756211A (en) jones
US2496595A (en) Formaldehyde corrosion inhibitor compositions
US3625888A (en) Oxygen scavenger system
US3208528A (en) Treatment of water-sensitive formations
Gordon et al. Salt effects on non-electrolyte activity coefficients in mixed aqueous electrolyte solutions—II. Artificial and natural sea waters
US3182018A (en) Inhibiting corrosion in oil wells
US2944969A (en) Prevention of rust and corrosion
US3119447A (en) Treatment of flood waters
US4460482A (en) Composition and method for corrosion inhibition
US3127932A (en) Composition and method for inhibiting corrosion in oil wells
US2698295A (en) Combating ferrous metal corrosion
US3412024A (en) Inhibition of corrosion of metals
Wachter et al. Preventing internal corrosion of pipe lines
US2429594A (en) Chemical treatment of oil well liquids for preventing scale formation
US3682831A (en) Method of and composition for the prevention of scale
US4511001A (en) Composition and method for corrosion inhibition
US2635698A (en) Method for inhibiting corrosion
US2510771A (en) Method of protecting metal surfaces against hydrogen sulfide corrosion
US2691631A (en) Method of inhibiting corrosion
US2574576A (en) Prevention of corrosion of steel by brine containing dissolved oxygen