[go: up one dir, main page]

US2982739A - Detergent additives - Google Patents

Detergent additives Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2982739A
US2982739A US522369A US52236955A US2982739A US 2982739 A US2982739 A US 2982739A US 522369 A US522369 A US 522369A US 52236955 A US52236955 A US 52236955A US 2982739 A US2982739 A US 2982739A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
detergent
additive
irritation
composition
additives
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US522369A
Inventor
Dvorkovitz Vladimir
Neil W Berst
George G Leist
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Diversey Wyandotte Corp
Diversey Corp USA
Original Assignee
Diversey Corp USA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Diversey Corp USA filed Critical Diversey Corp USA
Priority to US522369A priority Critical patent/US2982739A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2982739A publication Critical patent/US2982739A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to DIVERSEY WYANDOTTE CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE. reassignment DIVERSEY WYANDOTTE CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: DIVERSEY CORPORATION THE
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/20Organic compounds containing oxygen
    • C11D3/2075Carboxylic acids-salts thereof
    • C11D3/2086Hydroxy carboxylic acids-salts thereof

Definitions

  • This invention relates to additives that reduce the skin irritation that is normally .associated with the use of detergent formulations, the commercial application of said additives and detergent formulations containing said additivesm" a
  • water-soluble salts and/or water-soluble acids of hydroxy carboxylic acid derivatives having a total of at least 3 of the radicals: hydroxyl and carboxyl, as'well as materials-that form said salts and/or acids upon hydration are combined with detergents or detergent solutions (i.e., aqueous'solutions, 'etc.), they tend to reduce the skin irritation that 'is normally associated with detergent formulations.
  • additive(s) i.e., aqueous'solutions, 'etc.
  • materials such as gluconic acid or glucono delta-lactone (forms gluconic acid upon hydration), tartaric'acid and citric acid, as well as salts of said acids '(i.e., amine salts, alkali metal salts, ammonium salts) tend to inhibit the irritating effect on; skin that is normally induced by detergent formulations; f'
  • alkaline detergents are particularly effective when used in conjunction with alkaline detergents; however, they may also be employed *with substantially neutral detergents as well as detergent formulations 'containing niixtures of alkaline detergent (s) plus substantially neutral detergent(s).
  • the additives may be employedwith alkaline deterlgents such as phosphates, complexlphosphates, silicates,
  • soda ash, caustic, borates and the like which may contain alkali metal, amine and ammonium substituents.
  • substantially neutral detergents includes One of the conventional methods of studying skin irritation is to intradermally inject 0.5 cc. of the detergent formulation being tested into freshly'shaved American chinchilla rabbits. Observations are made after 24 hours and readings are made on the basis of 0 (for no irritation) to 5 (for very bad irritation).
  • Tests were first started using malechinchilla rabbits for test animals in accordance with the above-mentioned conventional test procedure. It was found, however, that about /3 to about /2 of the test rabbits had large, dark pigmented areas of skin that made the interpretation of results diflicult. Male albino rabbits were then obtained and a series of conventional tests were made with both types of rabbits to determine if the same results, or at least the same relative .results would be obtained with either kind of rabbit. The results of these comparison tests are shown in Table'I. A series of raw materials common to detergent formulations were injected at concentrations or V2 ounce per gallon with an injection pat tern reading from the back of the rabbit to. the front:
  • the injection pattern was from back to front:
  • injections 3-5-7 were injections wherein one concentration of the detergent was used, ⁇ 4-6-8 were tests wherein the concentration of the detergent was the same as 3-5-7 and the concentrations of the additive were successively increased.
  • injections 3-5-7 were identical control injections of detergent for the three different concentrations of additive employed-in injections 4-6-8.
  • concentration of the additives in the tables is based upon the total solids in the detergent plus additive compositions.
  • Tables II-IV show the results of testing glucono deltalactone, tartaric acid and citric acid additives, respectively, in conjunction with solutions of detergents such as sodium metasilicate, soda ash, trisodium phosphate, Triton X-100, and Oronite D-60.
  • detergents such as sodium metasilicate, soda ash, trisodium phosphate, Triton X-100, and Oronite D-60.
  • the results of these tests is givenas to degree of irritation and data is presented in the form of Treated Result and Untreated Result (e.g., 3-4 shows that the average degree of irritation with the indicated additive is 3 as compared with 4 for the detergent solution without the additive).
  • the additives i.e., glucono delta-lactone
  • the additives have been shown to be eifective when employed with the detergent in quantities as low as about 0.1% by weight (based upon the weight of the total solids in the detergent plus additive compositions) as shown in Table H, but we do not limit the invention to this concentration, although in order to insure the most efiective results we prefer not to use less If desired, higher concentrations of the additive may be employed.
  • a nonacid detergent composition having an additive which reduces the skin irritation that is normally induced by nonacid detergent compositions, said composition con- I sisting essentially of: a synthetic organic detergent from the group consisting of sodium-higher alkylbenzenevsulfonates and higher alkyl phenyl'ethers of polyethylene glycol, and at least 0.1% by weight, based on total solids, of a water-soluble additive which reduces the Skininita tion normally induced "by said organic detergents, said additive being a member from the group consisting of gluconic acid and water-soluble alkali metal salts thereof,
  • composition of claim 1 which includes an alkaline inorganic detergent -which serves as a detergent builder.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Emergency Medicine (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Cosmetics (AREA)

Description

United States Patent 1m 1 2,982,739" r DETERGENT ADDITIYES Vladimir Dvorkovitz, Kansas City, Mo., and Neil'W. Berst and George G. Leist, Evanston, Ill., assignors to The Diversey Corporation, a corporation of Illinois I No Drawing. Filed July 15, 1955, Ser'. No. 522,369 1 2 Claims. or. 252-156 This invention relates to additives that reduce the skin irritation that is normally .associated with the use of detergent formulations, the commercial application of said additives and detergent formulations containing said additivesm" a We have discovered that when water-soluble salts and/or water-soluble acids of hydroxy carboxylic acid derivatives having a total of at least 3 of the radicals: hydroxyl and carboxyl, as'well as materials-that form said salts and/or acids upon hydration, are combined with detergents or detergent solutions (i.e., aqueous'solutions, 'etc.), they tend to reduce the skin irritation that 'is normally associated with detergent formulations. These materials shall herein be referred to as additive(s). For example, materials such as gluconic acid or glucono delta-lactone (forms gluconic acid upon hydration), tartaric'acid and citric acid, as well as salts of said acids '(i.e., amine salts, alkali metal salts, ammonium salts) tend to inhibit the irritating effect on; skin that is normally induced by detergent formulations; f'
The additives, as well as combinations of the additives,
are particularly effective when used in conjunction with alkaline detergents; however, they may also be employed *with substantially neutral detergents as well as detergent formulations 'containing niixtures of alkaline detergent (s) plus substantially neutral detergent(s).
. The additives may be employedwith alkaline deterlgents such as phosphates, complexlphosphates, silicates,
soda ash, caustic, borates and the like which may contain alkali metal, amine and ammonium substituents.
The term substantially neutral detergents includes One of the conventional methods of studying skin irritation is to intradermally inject 0.5 cc. of the detergent formulation being tested into freshly'shaved American chinchilla rabbits. Observations are made after 24 hours and readings are made on the basis of 0 (for no irritation) to 5 (for very bad irritation).
Tests were first started using malechinchilla rabbits for test animals in accordance with the above-mentioned conventional test procedure. It was found, however, that about /3 to about /2 of the test rabbits had large, dark pigmented areas of skin that made the interpretation of results diflicult. Male albino rabbits were then obtained and a series of conventional tests were made with both types of rabbits to determine if the same results, or at least the same relative .results would be obtained with either kind of rabbit. The results of these comparison tests are shown in Table'I. A series of raw materials common to detergent formulations were injected at concentrations or V2 ounce per gallon with an injection pat tern reading from the back of the rabbit to. the front:
2 4 6 8 where 1-2 were saline solution controls, 3-4, 5-6 and 7-8 were duplicate injections of three raw materials (eg.,
3-4 were tetrasodium pyrophosphate; 5-6 were TABLE I Comparison of results obtained with male American chinchilla rabbits and male 'albino rabbits Rating of Irritation on Rabbits Chinehlllas Name of Materlal (Soln. at OzJGal.)
Alblnos Tetrasodium Pyrophosphate Tris odium Phosphate, Flnes Trip olyphosphate Soda Ash Niter Cake Oronite D60 Sodium Gluconat Triton X- In subsequent tests, our procedure consisted of injecting 0.5 ml. of solution intradermally into the side of a freshly clipped male albino rabbit. It was found that by carefully clipping the rabbits it'w'as not necessary to shave the small amount of remaining hair. By wetting 'the area with alcohol, injections and'observations were easily made. Tests were usually made at concentrations of M4, /2 and 1 ounce per gallon; these concentrations gave a degree of irritation that was definite, but not excessive. Eight injections were made to one rabbit side, and
a replicate test was made inmost cases on another rabbit.
Observations were made after. 24 hours and ratings were given on the basis of a scalewherein 0 represents no irritation and 5 represents verynbad or maximumirritation. The effect of, an additive on the detergents'was best detected when the detergent alone (without the additive) had a rating of 2 to 3. I I
The tests tabulated in Tables II-VIII were made on albino rabbits. Additives of various concentrations were employed. The concentration of the detergent formulations were 4 ounce per gallon, /2 ounce per gallon and 1 ounce per gallon. Replicates were run in most tests.
The injection pattern was from back to front:
where 1-2 were saline controls, 3-5-7 were injections wherein one concentration of the detergent was used, }4-6-8 were tests wherein the concentration of the detergent was the same as 3-5-7 and the concentrations of the additive were successively increased. Thus, injections 3-5-7 were identical control injections of detergent for the three different concentrations of additive employed-in injections 4-6-8. The concentration of the additives in the tables is based upon the total solids in the detergent plus additive compositions.
Tables II-IV show the results of testing glucono deltalactone, tartaric acid and citric acid additives, respectively, in conjunction with solutions of detergents such as sodium metasilicate, soda ash, trisodium phosphate, Triton X-100, and Oronite D-60. The results of these tests is givenas to degree of irritation and data is presented in the form of Treated Result and Untreated Result (e.g., 3-4 shows that the average degree of irritation with the indicated additive is 3 as compared with 4 for the detergent solution without the additive).
Since Orom'te D-60 is only about 60% active, the solutions were made 100% active at theindicated concentrations (oz/gal.) in each of the subsequent tables.
TABLE II Summary of the efiect of glueono delta-lactone on reducmg skin irritation caused by various detergent components Concentration Component Causing Irritation Degree of of Glucono Irritation, delta lactone, Treated- Percent of Conc., Oz./ Untreated,
Solids Name Gal. 24 Hrs. after Injection 2. Sodium Metasilicate 1 3.5-4 4. 0...- 1 3.5-4 9 d 1 3. 5-4 2. 0. 5 v 1. 5-3 4. 0.5 1. 5-3 9. 0. 5 1. 5-3 1. 0. 5 2. 5-3. 5 0. 0.5 2-3. 5 0. 0. 5 2. 5-3. 5 2.44 0. 25 0.5-1.5 4.76 0. 25 0.5-1.5 9.1. 0. 25 0. 5-1. 5 2.44 1 2.5-3.5 4.76 1 2. 5-3. 5 9.1- 1 2-3. 5 2.44 0.5 0-1. 5 4.76 0. 5 0.5-1.5 9.1.. O. 5 1-1. 5 1.0.. 0. 5 1-2 0.5.. 0.5 1-2 0.1.. 0.5 1-2 2.44 1 2-3 4.76 1 2-3 0.1. l 1. 5-3 2.44 0. 5 l-2 4.76 0.5 0. 5-2 9.1- 0.5 0. 5-2 2.44 1 2-3 4.76 1 2-3 9.1.. 1 2-3 2.44 0.5 0-0. 5 0.1- 0. 5 1-1. 5 2.44 l 1. 5-2 4.76 1 1-2 9.1- 1 1-2 2.44 0. 5 0. 5-1 1.0- 0.5 1-1. 5 0.5- 0. 5 1-1. 5 0 0.5 0. 5-1
TABLE III Summary of the efiect of tartaric acid on reducing skin Irritation caused by various detergent Components Component Causing Irritation Degree of Concentration Irritation, of Tartarie Treated- Acid, Percent Conc., Untreated, of Solids Name Oz./Ga1. 24 Hrs. After Injection 6.25. Sodium Metasi1icate.-- 0. 25 2. 5-8 11.8.- -.--.d0 0. 25 2.5-3 21.1 .d 0.25 2.5-3 1.64-- Soda Ash. 1 3. 5-5 3.23-. do..... 1 2.5-5 6.25-- (10.. 1 1. 5-5 3.23.. '.d().. 0.5 0. 5-2 6.25 -;do.- 0.5 0.5-2 11.8 --d0-- 0. 5 0. 5-2 6.25 .do.. 0. 25 0-1. 5 11.8 -60-- 0. 25 0-1. 5 21.1 "do 0.25 0-1. 5
- TABLE IV Summary of the efiect of citric acid on reducing Skill irritation caused by var ous detergent components Component Causing Irritation Degree of Concentration Irritation, of Citric Acid, Treated- Percent of Conc., Untreated,
Solids Name Oz./ Gal. 24 Hrs. After Injection 6.25 Sodium Metasilicate..... 0. 25 1-2 11.8-- -.-.-do 0. 25 1-2 21.1-- 0. 25 1-2 1.64.- 1 2. 5-4 3.23.- 1 2. 5-4 6.25.. 1 2-4 3.23.- 0. 5 0-1 6.25-- 0. 5 0-1 11.8 0. 5 0-1 Tables V and VI show the results of tests with lecithin and cetyl alcohol-urea complex, respectively; these materials were used as a basis for comparing their efiectivemess with our additives. The cetyl alcohol-urea complex is described in US. Patent 2,675,356. Lecithin was used since it has been alleged'that the presence of" 0.005 to 0.1% of soybean lecithin in detergent solutions protects the cell membranes against the irritating action of the detergent.
TABLE V Summary of the efiect of lecithin on reducing skin irritz'ztion caused by various detergent components Component Causing Irritation Degree of Concentration Irritation, of Lecithin; Treated- Percent of Conc., Untreated,
Solids F Name Oz./Gal. 24 Hrs. After Injection 1.24 Sodium Metasi1icate.-.. 1 '4. 5-4. 5 2.44. do 1 4-4 4.76. 1 4-4 9.1... 1 4-4 1.24. 0. 5 1. 5-2. 5 2.44. 0. 5 2. 5-3 4.76- 0. 5 2. 5-3 9.1... 0.5 3-3. 5 1.24. 0. 25 1-1. 5 2.44- 0. 25 1-2 4.76. 0. 25 1. 5-2 9.1.. 0. 25 2-2 1.24.- 1 3- .5 2 44 1 3-3. 5 4.76 1 3-3. 5 1.24 0.5 1-2 2.4 0.5 1-2 4.7, 0.5 1.5-2 1.24- 0. 25 0- .5 2.44- 0. 25 0-0. 5 4.76' 0. 25 0-0. 5
TABLE VI Summary ofthe effect of cetyl alcohol-urea .complex on reducing skin irritation caused by various detergent components Concentration Component Causing Irritation Degree of of Cetyi Alco- Irritation, hol-Urea Com- Treatedplex, Percent Conc., 0z./ Unrteated,
of Solids Name Gal. 24 Hrs. After Injection 1.24... 1 2.4 1 4-4 4.76. 1 4-4 1.24. 0. 5 2-3 2.44- 0. 5 2. 5-3 4.76. 0. 5 3-3 1.24- 0. 25 0. 5-0. 5 2.44. 0. 25 0. 5-0. 5 4.76. 0. 25 0. 5-0. 5 1.24. 1 1-3 2.44- V 1 2-3 4.76- 1 2. 5-3 124. 0.5 0.5-1.5 2.44- 0. 5 1-1. 5 4.76 0. 5 1-1. 5 1.24; 0. 25 0-0. 5 2.44. 0. 25 0-0. 5 4.76- 0. 25 0-0. 5 2.44- 1 l-2 4.76. 1 1-2 9.1-. 1 1-2 2.4 0. 5 0. 5-1 4.76 0. 5 0. 5-1 9 1 V 0. 5 0. 5-1 2.44 0. 25 0. 5-0. 5 4.76 0. 25 0.5-0. 5 9.1 0. 25 0.5-0. 5
The data shown in Table VII indicates that sodiu n gluconate, tartrate and citrate are effective additives.
TABLE vn Oz./Gal. Concentration of Metasilicate Cone. of Oz./Gal. 1 z./Gal. Name of Addition Addition, Replicate 1 Replicate 2 2 Percent of total Solids Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Replicate 1 Replicate 2 With- With With- With With- With With- With With- With With- With out out out out out out 9.1 a 0 3 i 0 4 s 5 1 4. 76 3 3 3 1. 5 4 3 5 2. 5 2. 44 3 2 3 3 4 3 5 1 11. 8 4 1 3. 5 2 6. 4 2 3. 5 2 5 4 5 4 3. 23 4 2 3. 5 2. 5 5 4 5 4 Concentration of Soda Ash Table VIII shows the effect in various additives upon various compositions that contain more than 1 detergent product.
TABLE VIII Efiect of additives of reducing skin irritation caused by various detergent formulations Reaction at 1 Oz./Gal. of Gene Formulated Product of Additive Additive Pef- Replicate 1 Replicate 2 can I Total Solids With- With With- With out out FORMULATION XF-iOO 1 Glucono delta-lactone 9.1 2 1. 5 2 0.5 4. 76 2 1 2 0. 5 Glucono delta-lactone 2.44 2 0. 5 2 0 Cetyl Alcohol-Urea Complex.... 9. 1 0 0 2 1. 5 Cetyl Alcohol-Urea Oomplex 4. 76 0 0 2 1 Oetyl Alcohol-Urea Complex.... 2. 44 0 0 2 1 FORMULATION XF-200 I Glucono delta-lactone 9. 1 2 0 0 0 Glucono delta-laetone--- 4. 76 2 0 0- 0 Glucono delta -laetone; 2. 44 2 1 I 0 I 0 Oetyl Alcohol-Urea Oomplex 9. 1 1. 5 O 2 2 I Oetyl Alcohol-Urea 0omplex 4.76 1. 5, 0. 5 2 1 Oetyl Alcohol-Urea0ompleL 2. 44 I 1. 5 0 I 2 1 SURF l Urea Urea The additives (i.e., glucono delta-lactone) have been shown to be eifective when employed with the detergent in quantities as low as about 0.1% by weight (based upon the weight of the total solids in the detergent plus additive compositions) as shown in Table H, but we do not limit the invention to this concentration, although in order to insure the most efiective results we prefer not to use less If desired, higher concentrations of the additive may be employed.
Although the present invention has been described in conjunction with preferred embodiments, it is to be'understood that modifications and variations may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as those skilled in the art will readily understand. Such variations and modifications are considered to be within the purview and scope of the invention and appended claims.
We claim: 1. A nonacid detergent composition having an additive which reduces the skin irritation that is normally induced by nonacid detergent compositions, said composition con- I sisting essentially of: a synthetic organic detergent from the group consisting of sodium-higher alkylbenzenevsulfonates and higher alkyl phenyl'ethers of polyethylene glycol, and at least 0.1% by weight, based on total solids, of a water-soluble additive which reduces the Skininita tion normally induced "by said organic detergents, said additive being a member from the group consisting of gluconic acid and water-soluble alkali metal salts thereof,
1 See following table: I by weight Soda Ash I 54.77.. Sodium tripolyphosphate 28.
l aryl sulio 15.00 Octyl phenol polyoxyethylene ether 2. 00 I Sodium carhorymethylcellulose..- I 0. 23 I Bee following table: I I j Sodium tripolyphosph n I I 22. 00 Sodium metasilim I I 16.00 Sodium carboxymethylcelluiosa 0.23 SodaAsh I I I 58.27 Sodium dodecyl benzene sulionate..... 2. 80 .1 Ethylene Glycol 0. 7!) ate said synthetic organic detergent being present in saidcomposition" in an amount in excess ofsaid additive.
2. He composition of claim 1 which includes an alkaline inorganic detergent -which serves as a detergent builder. I
I References Cited in thefilefof this patent I UNITED STAT ES PATENTS I oreatnr 'it i utn mgn Oct. 27, 1937

Claims (2)

1. A NONACID DETERGENT COMPOSITION HAVING AN ADDITIVE WHICH REDUCES THE SKIN IRRITATION THAT IS NORMALLY INDUCED BY NONACID DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS, SAID COMPOSITION CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF: A SYNTHETIC ORGANIC DETERGENT FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF SODIUM HIGHER ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATES AND HIGHER ALKYL PHENYL ETHERS OF POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL, AND AT LEAST 0.1% BY WEIGHT, BASED ON TOTAL SOLIDS, OF A WATER-SOLUBLE ADDITIVE WHICH REDUCES THE SKIN IRRITATION NORMALLY INDUCED BY SAID ORGANIC DETERGENTS, SAID ADDITIVE BEING A MEMBER FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF GLUCONIC ACID AND WATER-SOLUBLE ALKALI METAL SALTS THEREOF, SAID SYNTHETIC ORGANIC DETERGENT BEING PRESENT IN SAID COMPOSITION IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF SAID ADDITIVE.
2. THE COMPOSITION OF CLAIM 1 WHICH INCLUDES AN ALKALINE INORGANIC DETERGENT WHICH SERVES AS A DETERGENT BUILDER.
US522369A 1955-07-15 1955-07-15 Detergent additives Expired - Lifetime US2982739A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US522369A US2982739A (en) 1955-07-15 1955-07-15 Detergent additives

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US522369A US2982739A (en) 1955-07-15 1955-07-15 Detergent additives

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2982739A true US2982739A (en) 1961-05-02

Family

ID=24080588

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US522369A Expired - Lifetime US2982739A (en) 1955-07-15 1955-07-15 Detergent additives

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2982739A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3334147A (en) * 1962-02-28 1967-08-01 Economics Lab Defoaming and surface active compositions
US4031024A (en) * 1974-06-10 1977-06-21 Societe Francaise Des Silicates Speciaux "Sifrance" Process for improving the stability and shaping of anhydrous sodium metasilicate, and the compositions containing same, and the resulting products
US4152305A (en) * 1974-06-20 1979-05-01 Safe-Tech, Inc. Nontoxic general purpose liquid cleaning compositions
US4666712A (en) * 1982-10-23 1987-05-19 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Cold permanent wave composition

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB459039A (en) * 1934-03-24 1936-12-28 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Manufacture of washing agents and detergents
GB474082A (en) * 1936-03-24 1937-10-25 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Process for avoiding or delaying the formation of precipitates in aqueous liquids or for redissolving the same, particularly the precipitates formed owing to the hardness of water
US2584017A (en) * 1952-01-29 Washing composition
US2628199A (en) * 1949-12-21 1953-02-10 Frederick A Lowenheim Tarnish remover
US2674523A (en) * 1953-04-24 1954-04-06 Kelite Products Inc Process and composition for treatment of magnesium prior to spot welding
US2675356A (en) * 1950-10-23 1954-04-13 Du Pont Detergent compositions

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2584017A (en) * 1952-01-29 Washing composition
GB459039A (en) * 1934-03-24 1936-12-28 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Manufacture of washing agents and detergents
GB474082A (en) * 1936-03-24 1937-10-25 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Process for avoiding or delaying the formation of precipitates in aqueous liquids or for redissolving the same, particularly the precipitates formed owing to the hardness of water
US2628199A (en) * 1949-12-21 1953-02-10 Frederick A Lowenheim Tarnish remover
US2675356A (en) * 1950-10-23 1954-04-13 Du Pont Detergent compositions
US2674523A (en) * 1953-04-24 1954-04-06 Kelite Products Inc Process and composition for treatment of magnesium prior to spot welding

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3334147A (en) * 1962-02-28 1967-08-01 Economics Lab Defoaming and surface active compositions
US4031024A (en) * 1974-06-10 1977-06-21 Societe Francaise Des Silicates Speciaux "Sifrance" Process for improving the stability and shaping of anhydrous sodium metasilicate, and the compositions containing same, and the resulting products
US4152305A (en) * 1974-06-20 1979-05-01 Safe-Tech, Inc. Nontoxic general purpose liquid cleaning compositions
US4666712A (en) * 1982-10-23 1987-05-19 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Cold permanent wave composition

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3538009A (en) Method for reducing skin irritation in detergent compositions
US3835057A (en) Anti-bacterial detergent bar
DE1964088C3 (en) Stabilized aqueous enzyme mixture
US3824190A (en) Phenolic synthetic detergent-disinfectant
AT394205B (en) STABILIZED, ENZYMETIC, LIQUID CLEANER
US3893955A (en) Aqueous concentrate detergent component
CA1076446A (en) Cleaning composition
CH632007A5 (en) LIQUID, ENZYME-CONCENTRATE, USED AS WASHING AND CLEANING AGENT.
DE2164993A1 (en) Detergent
US3629127A (en) Low foaming rinse additive
DE2552353C3 (en)
US3445398A (en) Synergistic antibacterial compositions
US2982739A (en) Detergent additives
US3380923A (en) Germicidal compositions
US2878190A (en) Detergents containing succinic compounds
EP0172534A2 (en) Liquid cleaning agent
EP0482046B1 (en) Enzymatic cleaner
EP0111284A2 (en) Cleaning process.
US2183037A (en) Germicidal detergent
US3084097A (en) Antibacterial compositions
US3239468A (en) Hard surface cleaning compositions
DE2753175A1 (en) DETERGENT MIXTURE
US2962448A (en) Detergent composition
US3069358A (en) Germicidal detergent composition
US3720620A (en) Synergistic antiseptic compositions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DIVERSEY WYANDOTTE CORPORATION, 1532 BIDDLE AVE.,

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:DIVERSEY CORPORATION THE;REEL/FRAME:003954/0125

Effective date: 19820107

Owner name: DIVERSEY WYANDOTTE CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE., MI

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIVERSEY CORPORATION THE;REEL/FRAME:003954/0125

Effective date: 19820107