[go: up one dir, main page]

US2903409A - Insulating and coskgsion protective - Google Patents

Insulating and coskgsion protective Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2903409A
US2903409A US2903409DA US2903409A US 2903409 A US2903409 A US 2903409A US 2903409D A US2903409D A US 2903409DA US 2903409 A US2903409 A US 2903409A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
mesh
particles
water
screen
retardency
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
Publication date
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2903409A publication Critical patent/US2903409A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10CWORKING-UP PITCH, ASPHALT, BITUMEN, TAR; PYROLIGNEOUS ACID
    • C10C3/00Working-up pitch, asphalt, bitumen
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/29Coated or structually defined flake, particle, cell, strand, strand portion, rod, filament, macroscopic fiber or mass thereof

Definitions

  • This invention relates to granulated insulation of the type covering metallic and other structures that are to be buried in the earth, to prevent corrosion of such structures and also to retard the flow of heat to or from the structure, and particularly refers to natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens, oxidized asphalts, steam refined asphalts, hard natural asphalts, and specifically granulated gilsonite having certain physical, structural, and water-repellant or hydrophobic characteristics that will be pointed out in detail below.
  • the materials of that patent included powdered gilsonite among a group of natural asphaltites.
  • the gilsonite was ground so that 50 to 80 percent would pass a 10-mesh screen, and included larger pieces up to 1 inch in maximum dimension, as well as an unspecified proportion of the nature of an impalpable powder or dust.
  • a layer of 2 inches or more was poured around the pipe to be protected, and, after backfilling, the pipe was heated for a period of 10 to 50 hours and at a temperature of 235 to about 500 F., suflicient to completely consolidate the gilsonite at the pipe surface and for a short distance outwardly, the melted zone merging into a sintered zone and then to discrete particles.
  • This invention comprehends broadly hitherto unused ranges and proportions of sizes of granulated bituminous materials to developthe full advantages of the hydrophobic nature of those materials to an extent that renders unnecessary the heating step of the Baker patent referred to above. Numerous applications of the improvement are thus possible where heating would not be feasible or desirable.
  • Another important factor in the practice of this invention is the selection of a bituminous material having a sintering temperature that is not substantially lower than the highest temperature that will be attained by the body or structure being protected.
  • Gilsonites having sintering temperatures between 150 and 250 F. and even higher may be obtained.
  • Grahamites and wurtzilites may be found to have sintering temperatures up to 500 F' and tures may be determined by heating a quantity of the ice granulated bituminous material under controlled conditions and noting the temperature at which adjacent discrete particles adhere. If the sintering temperature is exceeded for a sufficient distance outward from the hot object being protected, the mobility of the insulation layer is lost and its ability to accept movement or settling without creating voids or fissures is impaired.
  • Another object is to provide an insulation which requires no preliminary application of heat prior to its use, and which will retain mobility, flexibility or fluidity over extended periods to accept without damage movements of the structure it encloses as well as soil movement.
  • Another object is to provide an insulation which may be adapted for different conditions of use, e.g., where high load-carrying properties are desirable, without materially detracting from its water repellancy.
  • Another object is to provide an insulation that will be effective in reducing heat How and also will give substantial protection against flow of electrolytic or soil current, for example, for footings or structural foundations in geographical areas when permafrost is encountered. Such a material will also be eifective in protecting buried materials of construction in areas possessing corrosive soil.
  • Another object is to produce an insulation and corrosion protective material comprising substantially unsintered, discrete, hydrophobic bituminous particles.
  • An insulation requiring no consolidation will usually be thinner and, hence, will require much less material than one having an equal heat loss rate and possessing some consolidated particles.
  • Another object is to provide a material which may be readily and simply prepared by grinding and size-classifying or screening equipment to meet the particle size distributions that are essential or desirable for its successful use.
  • Figure 1 is a trilinear diagram showing ranges of the screen analyses effective for the practice of the invention.
  • Figure 2 is a diagrammatic and part sectional view of an example of a simple form of testing apparatus by which the Water retardency of a given particle size mixture or batch of the material may be determined in a short. time.
  • the equipment may also be used for long-time tests, if so desired.
  • the three scales of this trilinear diagram represent percentages of particles of bitumen within specific size ranges.
  • the vertical scale represents the fraction having the largest dimensions, 8 +20 mesh, which refers to the ASTM specification E-l 1-39' Tyler sieves (nominally called screens), and signifies the percentage of that material which passes through an 8-mesh screen and is retained on a 20-mesh screen.
  • the diagonal scale represents the fraction passing through a 20-mesh and retained on an -mesh Tyler screen.
  • the horizontal scale represents the percentage of material finer than 80 mesh.
  • point X designates a three-component system which is composed of 45 percent -8+20 mesh, 20 percent 20+80 mesh and 35 percent -80 mesh bitumen particles.
  • the distribution and sizing range of the 80 mesh will be discussed in more detail below.
  • the data dotted on the diagram of Figure 1 include the results of numerous tests of water retardency and what may be termed packability. It will be noted that there are two general areas designated in Figure 1, that area within ABCKDA representing high water retardency and reasonably good packability, and that area outside of ABCKDA representing low or moderate water retardency and/or low packability.
  • IHBEI represents desirable ranges of screen analyses of bituminous particles suitable for practicing this invention, and the remaining area represents unsuitable or undesirable sizes of bitumen particles. However, it will be shown subsequently that portions of area IHBEI may have accompanying restrictions imposed.
  • the area enclosed by ABCKDA includes the preferred ranges of particle sizes and proportions for materials having high water retardency and reasonably good packability.
  • the region in area BEAB and to the right of the line FG designates mixtures of particle sizes that are particularly benefited in regard to water retardency by having a large proportion of the 80 mesh particles in the 18 micron range.
  • Area HBAIH of Figure 1 has excellent load-bearing and packing characteristics and moderately good water retardency. Accordingly, this range of particle sizes proves excellent for insulating and protecting construction materials against corrosion when soil water heads are modest, say about 12 inches or more. In this area and in the range of about 2030% of 8+20 mesh, accelerated water retardency up to 1523 inches is obtainable.
  • the area immediately surrounding line J-K of Figure 1 in the area GCKDF G particle size ranges having optimum water retardency, up to approximately 30-60 inches, and reasonably good packability.
  • granulated bituminous mixes according to this invention will assume a degree of compaction of over 0.65 when they are poured into place to insure that there will be no voids beside or beneath the body being protected.
  • degree of compaction as used herein may be defined as the bulk density divided by the true density of a bituminous particle. Excessive tamping may increase the degree of compaction, approaching a maximum of 1.0, which means all voids have been filled. This is undesirable due to lack of fluidity or mobility of the insulation layer which enables it to accept without cracking a certain degree of motion of the structure being insulated, soil movements, and the like.
  • the thickness of the granulated layer may vary according to the insulating properties desired, and generally ranges from a minimum of about 2 inches to 6 inches or more.
  • packability refers to the ability of the granulated material to lose its fluify or flow characteristics upon being vibrated, tamped, or knifed into place. For example, if 80 mesh bitumen particles are poured in a ditch containing a pipe line, the fine material will tend to flow outwardly much as water would. It will prove almost impossible to tamp because of its flufly character. Accordingly, such finely divided material will not generally be desirable to support surface loads and will prove difiicult to place in a ditch.
  • the property of packability as used herein, and which is an indication of load-bearing ability, may be determined by means of a penetrometer such as is used for consistency of lubricating greases (ASTM D 217-52T; American Standards Association ASA No. Z 11.3-1952), and desirably modified to provide a solid metal cone having an included angle of 45 and a total weight, including movable attachments of 400:0.05 grams.
  • This may be fabricated of brass rod 1.375 inch in diameter having a cylindrical section about 0.37 inch long, the conical portion being 1.60 inch long.
  • the axial guide shaft opposite the point of thecone is 0.125 inch diameter and 2 inches long. Desirably, the outer surface is protected against abrasion by electroplating and polishing.
  • the procedure for determining the penetration or packability is carried out at atmospheric temperature (65- 85 F.) on a sample of the granulated mixture retained in suitable container about 3 inches in diameter and 4 inches high. After adequate mixing or blending, enough of the granulated bituminous mixture is poured into the container to fill it completely, with a minimum of agitation. While the filled container rests upon a hard, flat, level surface, it is rotated slowly and tapped around its periphery, for example, by the handle of a conventional wooden handled laboratory spatula about 15 inches long.
  • the spatula is grasped by the hand at the outer end of the blade, and it is uniformly and firmly tapped about 30 times against the container wall to give a uniform degree of settling, the force of tapping being supplied solely by fiicking the index finger.
  • the filled container is placed in the penetrometer and the cone is lowered until the point just touches the surface of the sample, after which the release clutch is operated and the cone permitted to penetrate the sample mixture under its unsupported weight. This will require only a few seconds, after which the penetration depth indicator shaft is depressed in the usual manner to touch the upper end of the cone shaft, and the dial indicator, calibrated in tenths of millimeters, is read. Desirably, six successive readings are taken following the procedure just outlined, the sample being removed from its holder and remixed thoroughly between each test. The two readings deviating the greatest from the average should generally be ignored and the average of the four remaining readings utilized.
  • Mixtures according to this invention having penetra tions below about 250-260 pack reasonably well and are capable of taking appreciable surface loads. Mixtures having penetrations above about 275-290 tend to be fiuffy, are difiicult to pack around the structure to be insulated and protected, and will generally tend to be deficient in load-carrying properties, unless auxiliary coverings, such as a sheet of fibrous or metallic material, are used as load-distributors or load-carriers.
  • reference numeral designates an open topped metal container, which, in this example, may be about 4 inches in diameter and 9 inches high. About one inch from the bottom is placed a removable metal screen 11, desirably formed from a lower disc 12 of 10-mesh screen on top of which is accured a disc 13 of 40-mesh screen.
  • a water inlet 17 in the bottom of container 10 is covered with a suitable metal screen 18 to prevent loss of gravel frombed 14 and communicates 'with a waterfilled bottle 19 by means of a valved flexible tube 20.
  • a ring stand 21 or other vertically adjustable means is adapted to support bottle 19 so that the surface of the water therein is at a desired height H above the level of screen 11.
  • a rubber stopper 25 is placed over the rod and on the particles 22 and held in place by clamp 26.
  • an electrical resistance measuring device such as ohmmeter 27, is connected by wires 28 and 29 between container 10 and control rod 23. Normally the electrical resistance of the system just described will be very high, on the order of 200 to 1000 megohms.
  • a permanent or long-time head test may be conducted in the same manner described above except after reaching a given height, H, dependent upon conditions of use, the head is not again altered.
  • accelerated and permanent tests are run on materials containing 35% -80 mesh or less.
  • Permanent tests alone are run on materials having a -80 mesh content above about 35%. This arises from the fact that when the percent of -80 mesh becomes higher, the discrepancy between accelerated and permanent head results becomes greater and, accordingly, the accelerated test loses some of its significance.
  • Example I v v Percent -8-i-20mesh 1lto60 mesh 20 to 30 the -80 mesh material containing particles down to and including -18 microns.
  • -20+80 mesh Remainder Example 11 Percent -8+20 mesh a 11 to 55 -80 mesh 20 to 35 the -80 mesh fraction consisting of material down to and including the -18 micron size which comprises a minimum of by number 1 of the -80 mesh fraction.
  • -20+80 mesh Remainder Percent by number is obtained by counting the number of particles with the aid of a microscope.
  • Example III the -8+l0 mesh fraction comprising between 0 and 80% of the -8+20 mesh fraction.
  • -20+80 mesh Remainder Example V Percent -8+20 mesh 8to 35 -80 mesh 25 to 45 the -80 mesh fraction consisting of material down to and including the -18 micron size which comprises a minimum of 90% by number of the -80 mesh fraction.
  • -20+80 mesh Remainder Example VI To be used around pipe with a device such as a conduit or concrete slab to protect against surface loads, or to be used on pipe buried deep in compacted soil.
  • this invention is directed to an improved insulation consisting of discrete hydrophobic particles of bituminous material chosen from the groups enumerated above, and which has been granulated, classified and blended to give specific proportions of particles in certain size ranges. It has been shown that these ranges are material to the success of the invention. Accordingly, all such sizes and proportions that come within the scope of the appended claims are intended to be embraced thereby.
  • An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the particles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite'having a sintering temperature above the maximum temperature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the area Il-IBEI of the trilinear diagram of Figure 1.
  • An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the particles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite having a sintering temperature above the maximum temperature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the area ABCKDA of the tr'ilinear diagram of Figure 1.
  • An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the particles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite having a sintering temperature above the maximum term perature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the area GCKDFG of the trilinear diagram of Figure l.
  • An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the particles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite having a sintering temperature above the maximum temperature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the area AIHBA of the trilinear diagram of Figure 1.
  • An insulating body of granular material according to claim 4 which will have an accelerated water retardency between about 15 and inches when imposed at the rate of one inch in 5 minutes.
  • An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the particles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite having a sintering temperature above the maximum temperature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the values of the following table, expressed in percent by weight:
  • the mesh fraction includes particles down to and including 20 microns, and which will have an accelerated water retardency greater than about 24 inches when imposed at the rate of one inch in 5 minutes.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Sealing Material Composition (AREA)

Description

Sept. 8, 1959 P. MORSE INSULATING AND CORROSION PROTECTIVE MATERIAL Filed July 11, 1956 0 w F 5 a Y RL 0 G 6 m N D A 6 R 6 A F 4 E 0 w MM Xe w Q R S T 4 K 40 C 0 A6 X 4 o o G J a m H e v o o O o o 0 o o w 8 6 4 2 IWUE ON+ w .rzwumum PERCENT -8O MESH 'INVENTOR PA yOR FIG. 2
ATTORNEYS United States harem:
INSULATING AND CORRGSION PROTECTIVE MATERIAL Park L. Morse, Salt Lake City, Utah, assignor to American Gilsonite Company, Salt Lake City, Utah, a cor poration of Delaware Application July 11, 1956, Serial No. 597,208
8 Claims. (Cl. 208-22) This invention relates to granulated insulation of the type covering metallic and other structures that are to be buried in the earth, to prevent corrosion of such structures and also to retard the flow of heat to or from the structure, and particularly refers to natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens, oxidized asphalts, steam refined asphalts, hard natural asphalts, and specifically granulated gilsonite having certain physical, structural, and water-repellant or hydrophobic characteristics that will be pointed out in detail below.
This is an improvement over the materials and the procedures for their use described in US. Patent No.
2,668,125, issued February 2, 1954, to J. H. Baker et al.
The materials of that patent included powdered gilsonite among a group of natural asphaltites. The gilsonite was ground so that 50 to 80 percent would pass a 10-mesh screen, and included larger pieces up to 1 inch in maximum dimension, as well as an unspecified proportion of the nature of an impalpable powder or dust. A layer of 2 inches or more was poured around the pipe to be protected, and, after backfilling, the pipe was heated for a period of 10 to 50 hours and at a temperature of 235 to about 500 F., suflicient to completely consolidate the gilsonite at the pipe surface and for a short distance outwardly, the melted zone merging into a sintered zone and then to discrete particles.
This invention comprehends broadly hitherto unused ranges and proportions of sizes of granulated bituminous materials to developthe full advantages of the hydrophobic nature of those materials to an extent that renders unnecessary the heating step of the Baker patent referred to above. Numerous applications of the improvement are thus possible where heating would not be feasible or desirable.
There are a number of factors that are involved in the practice of this invention, one of the most important being the proportions of particles of specific size ranges, which affects not only the water retardency of the final insulation, but also its load-bearing characteristics and even, to some extent, the behavior of the material during shipment. To demonstrate its utility and to provide a means for quickly predicting and checking the efficiency of a given lot of material, a water retardency test procedure and test equipment have been developed and will be illustrated and described herein.
Another important factor in the practice of this invention is the selection of a bituminous material having a sintering temperature that is not substantially lower than the highest temperature that will be attained by the body or structure being protected. Gilsonites "having sintering temperatures between 150 and 250 F. and even higher may be obtained. Grahamites and wurtzilites may be found to have sintering temperatures up to 500 F' and tures may be determined by heating a quantity of the ice granulated bituminous material under controlled conditions and noting the temperature at which adjacent discrete particles adhere. If the sintering temperature is exceeded for a sufficient distance outward from the hot object being protected, the mobility of the insulation layer is lost and its ability to accept movement or settling without creating voids or fissures is impaired.
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved granulated bituminous insulating material which will be effective to protect structures, for example, buried pipelines carrying relatively cool fluids (at soil temperatures or higher), from corrosion by soil water or electrolytes at moderate hydrostatic heads such as are generally encountered in field practice.
Another object is to provide an insulation which requires no preliminary application of heat prior to its use, and which will retain mobility, flexibility or fluidity over extended periods to accept without damage movements of the structure it encloses as well as soil movement.
Another object is to provide an insulation which may be adapted for different conditions of use, e.g., where high load-carrying properties are desirable, without materially detracting from its water repellancy.
Another object is to provide an insulation that will be effective in reducing heat How and also will give substantial protection against flow of electrolytic or soil current, for example, for footings or structural foundations in geographical areas when permafrost is encountered. Such a material will also be eifective in protecting buried materials of construction in areas possessing corrosive soil.
Another object is to produce an insulation and corrosion protective material comprising substantially unsintered, discrete, hydrophobic bituminous particles. An insulation requiring no consolidation will usually be thinner and, hence, will require much less material than one having an equal heat loss rate and possessing some consolidated particles.
Another object is to provide a material which may be readily and simply prepared by grinding and size-classifying or screening equipment to meet the particle size distributions that are essential or desirable for its successful use.
These and other objects and advantages will be further apparent from the following description of several examples of formulations embodying the invention, taken in connection with the accompanying drawing, which forms a part of this specification.
In the drawing,
Figure 1 is a trilinear diagram showing ranges of the screen analyses effective for the practice of the invention.
Figure 2 is a diagrammatic and part sectional view of an example of a simple form of testing apparatus by which the Water retardency of a given particle size mixture or batch of the material may be determined in a short. time. The equipment may also be used for long-time tests, if so desired.
Referring first to Figure 1, it will be noted that the three scales of this trilinear diagram represent percentages of particles of bitumen within specific size ranges. The vertical scale represents the fraction having the largest dimensions, 8 +20 mesh, which refers to the ASTM specification E-l 1-39' Tyler sieves (nominally called screens), and signifies the percentage of that material which passes through an 8-mesh screen and is retained on a 20-mesh screen. The diagonal scale represents the fraction passing through a 20-mesh and retained on an -mesh Tyler screen. The horizontal scale represents the percentage of material finer than 80 mesh.
Although Tyler screen sizes in the fine series have openings as small as 37 microns (No. 400), it has been found that use of screens smaller than about 80 mesh (about microns) for pulverized bituminous materials gives erratic and oftentimes false readings due to screening difficulties during the shaking operation. Accordingly, in determining the proportions of sizes smaller than about 80 mesh, it has been found convenient to disperse that fraction in fresh water, desirably with a surface-active agent, to overcome its hydrophobic properties, and to count the number of particles of desired sizes with a comparison microscope.
For example, point X designates a three-component system which is composed of 45 percent -8+20 mesh, 20 percent 20+80 mesh and 35 percent -80 mesh bitumen particles. The distribution and sizing range of the 80 mesh will be discussed in more detail below.
The data dotted on the diagram of Figure 1 include the results of numerous tests of water retardency and what may be termed packability. It will be noted that there are two general areas designated in Figure 1, that area within ABCKDA representing high water retardency and reasonably good packability, and that area outside of ABCKDA representing low or moderate water retardency and/or low packability. In general, IHBEI represents desirable ranges of screen analyses of bituminous particles suitable for practicing this invention, and the remaining area represents unsuitable or undesirable sizes of bitumen particles. However, it will be shown subsequently that portions of area IHBEI may have accompanying restrictions imposed. The area enclosed by ABCKDA includes the preferred ranges of particle sizes and proportions for materials having high water retardency and reasonably good packability. It has been found that, as a composition departs from the line CKD toward point E, the mechanical load-bearing characteristics and packability are less desirable, even though water retardency may be improved, so that mixtures in the area CKDEC will usually require a supplemental mechanical covering over the bitumen layer to make up for somewhat lower loadbearing characteristics.
As will be noted from the examples at the end of this specification, the region in area BEAB and to the right of the line FG designates mixtures of particle sizes that are particularly benefited in regard to water retardency by having a large proportion of the 80 mesh particles in the 18 micron range.
Area HBAIH of Figure 1 has excellent load-bearing and packing characteristics and moderately good water retardency. Accordingly, this range of particle sizes proves excellent for insulating and protecting construction materials against corrosion when soil water heads are modest, say about 12 inches or more. In this area and in the range of about 2030% of 8+20 mesh, accelerated water retardency up to 1523 inches is obtainable.
The area immediately surrounding line J-K of Figure 1 in the area GCKDF G particle size ranges having optimum water retardency, up to approximately 30-60 inches, and reasonably good packability.
In general, it has been found that granulated bituminous mixes according to this invention will assume a degree of compaction of over 0.65 when they are poured into place to insure that there will be no voids beside or beneath the body being protected. The term degree of compaction as used herein may be defined as the bulk density divided by the true density of a bituminous particle. Excessive tamping may increase the degree of compaction, approaching a maximum of 1.0, which means all voids have been filled. This is undesirable due to lack of fluidity or mobility of the insulation layer which enables it to accept without cracking a certain degree of motion of the structure being insulated, soil movements, and the like. The thickness of the granulated layer may vary according to the insulating properties desired, and generally ranges from a minimum of about 2 inches to 6 inches or more.
The expression packability used above refers to the ability of the granulated material to lose its fluify or flow characteristics upon being vibrated, tamped, or knifed into place. For example, if 80 mesh bitumen particles are poured in a ditch containing a pipe line, the fine material will tend to flow outwardly much as water would. It will prove almost impossible to tamp because of its flufly character. Accordingly, such finely divided material will not generally be desirable to support surface loads and will prove difiicult to place in a ditch.
The property of packability as used herein, and which is an indication of load-bearing ability, may be determined by means of a penetrometer such as is used for consistency of lubricating greases (ASTM D 217-52T; American Standards Association ASA No. Z 11.3-1952), and desirably modified to provide a solid metal cone having an included angle of 45 and a total weight, including movable attachments of 400:0.05 grams. This may be fabricated of brass rod 1.375 inch in diameter having a cylindrical section about 0.37 inch long, the conical portion being 1.60 inch long. The axial guide shaft opposite the point of thecone is 0.125 inch diameter and 2 inches long. Desirably, the outer surface is protected against abrasion by electroplating and polishing.
The procedure for determining the penetration or packability is carried out at atmospheric temperature (65- 85 F.) on a sample of the granulated mixture retained in suitable container about 3 inches in diameter and 4 inches high. After adequate mixing or blending, enough of the granulated bituminous mixture is poured into the container to fill it completely, with a minimum of agitation. While the filled container rests upon a hard, flat, level surface, it is rotated slowly and tapped around its periphery, for example, by the handle of a conventional wooden handled laboratory spatula about 15 inches long. Desirably, the spatula is grasped by the hand at the outer end of the blade, and it is uniformly and firmly tapped about 30 times against the container wall to give a uniform degree of settling, the force of tapping being supplied solely by fiicking the index finger.
The filled container is placed in the penetrometer and the cone is lowered until the point just touches the surface of the sample, after which the release clutch is operated and the cone permitted to penetrate the sample mixture under its unsupported weight. This will require only a few seconds, after which the penetration depth indicator shaft is depressed in the usual manner to touch the upper end of the cone shaft, and the dial indicator, calibrated in tenths of millimeters, is read. Desirably, six successive readings are taken following the procedure just outlined, the sample being removed from its holder and remixed thoroughly between each test. The two readings deviating the greatest from the average should generally be ignored and the average of the four remaining readings utilized.
Mixtures according to this invention having penetra tions below about 250-260 pack reasonably well and are capable of taking appreciable surface loads. Mixtures having penetrations above about 275-290 tend to be fiuffy, are difiicult to pack around the structure to be insulated and protected, and will generally tend to be deficient in load-carrying properties, unless auxiliary coverings, such as a sheet of fibrous or metallic material, are used as load-distributors or load-carriers.
Penetration or packability results for some granulated bitumen made from ground and sized gilsonite from the Eureka, Utah location are given in Table I.
TABLE I Sizing, Weight Percent P enetr Blend tion a Mesh Mesh Mesh 50. 0 20. 0 so. 0 '23s 44. 5 20. 1 35. 4 228 42. 1 17. 8 40. 1 252 37. 8 16.9 45. 2 286 36.0 14.0 50.0 345 Referring now to Figure 2, which illustrates a form of apparatus for testing of the water retardency for the particle size ranges of this invention, reference numeral designates an open topped metal container, which, in this example, may be about 4 inches in diameter and 9 inches high. About one inch from the bottom is placed a removable metal screen 11, desirably formed from a lower disc 12 of 10-mesh screen on top of which is accured a disc 13 of 40-mesh screen. Below screen 11'is placed a quantity of -8 mesh gravel to form a readily water-permeable bed 14. An air vent tube 15 leads through the wall of container 10 and terminates at the bottom of screen 12. Valve 16 is provided to close vent tube 15 when bed 14 has been filled with Water to the level of screen 11. t
A water inlet 17 in the bottom of container 10 is covered with a suitable metal screen 18 to prevent loss of gravel frombed 14 and communicates 'with a waterfilled bottle 19 by means of a valved flexible tube 20. A ring stand 21 or other vertically adjustable means is adapted to support bottle 19 so that the surface of the water therein is at a desired height H above the level of screen 11.
To prepare the equipment of Figure 2 of this example for a test of the water retardency of a given mixture of bituminous particles 22, a quantity of these particles adequate to fill container 10 is placed therein at a desired degree of compaction, which may be attained by previously calibrating the volume of the container to a depth of 1% inch above screen 11, placing a weighed amount of bituminous material in the container and vibrating it to the 1% inch level, then leveling the surface through the light action of a cylindrical tamper. A metal rod 23 terminating in a metal disc 24 is centered in container 10, with the disc resting on the previously compacted bitumen layer. Thereafter, several successive amounts of the same mixture of bitumen particles 22 are added to fiill container 10 to a point somewhat below the top, each layer being added so as to provide essentially the same bulk density as the previous layer. Tapping of the cylinder wall provides a means for accomplishing this.
A rubber stopper 25 is placed over the rod and on the particles 22 and held in place by clamp 26. Finally, an electrical resistance measuring device, such as ohmmeter 27, is connected by wires 28 and 29 between container 10 and control rod 23. Normally the electrical resistance of the system just described will be very high, on the order of 200 to 1000 megohms.
To impose the accelerated test on the bitumen particle mixture 22 in container 10, water is admitted from bottle 19 through tube to bed 14 below screen 11. After air has been vented from bed 14 through the vent tube 15, as evidenced by water flowing out of valve 16, that valve is closed and the bottle 19 is positioned to impose a hydrostatic head H of one inch upon the bitumen layer below disc 24 for a period of five minutes, after which it is raised a specific distance, for example, one inch for each of successive five minute intervals. Meanwhile, the condition of electrical resistance between screen 11 and disc 24 is noted by observing the indication of ohmmeter 27. When sufficient hydrostatic head has been imposed to force water through the 1% inch layer of bitumen particles 22, as evidenced by the resistance suddenly dropping to a lower value, for example, below 10 megohms, the hydrostatic head required is noted, and the test is completed.
A permanent or long-time head test may be conducted in the same manner described above except after reaching a given height, H, dependent upon conditions of use, the head is not again altered. In general, accelerated and permanent tests are run on materials containing 35% -80 mesh or less. Permanent tests alone are run on materials having a -80 mesh content above about 35%. This arises from the fact that when the percent of -80 mesh becomes higher, the discrepancy between accelerated and permanent head results becomes greater and, accordingly, the accelerated test loses some of its significance.
Examples of the practice of this invention representative of the granulated hydrophobic bituminous materials enumerated are given below.
Example I v v Percent -8-i-20mesh 1lto60 mesh 20 to 30 the -80 mesh material containing particles down to and including -18 microns. -20+80 mesh Remainder Example 11 Percent -8+20 mesh a 11 to 55 -80 mesh 20 to 35 the -80 mesh fraction consisting of material down to and including the -18 micron size which comprises a minimum of by number 1 of the -80 mesh fraction. -20+80 mesh Remainder Percent by number is obtained by counting the number of particles with the aid of a microscope.
Example III the -8+l0 mesh fraction comprising between 0 and 80% of the -8+20 mesh fraction. -80 mesh 25 to 65 the -80 mesh fraction consisting of material down to and including the -18 micron size which comprises a minimum of 90% by number of the -80 mesh fraction.
-20+80 mesh Remainder Example V Percent -8+20 mesh 8to 35 -80 mesh 25 to 45 the -80 mesh fraction consisting of material down to and including the -18 micron size which comprises a minimum of 90% by number of the -80 mesh fraction. -20+80 mesh Remainder Example VI To be used around pipe with a device such as a conduit or concrete slab to protect against surface loads, or to be used on pipe buried deep in compacted soil.
Percent -20+80 mesh l0to40' -80 mesh 45 to 90 the -80 mesh fraction consisting of material down to and including the -18 micron size which comprises a minimum of 90% by number of the -80 mesh fraction. -8+20 mesh Remainder Example VII Following is an example of a specific formulation of gilsonite mined at Eureka, Utah, illustrating the teaching of this specification:
Size: Percent by Weight -s+10 mesh 14.2 10+20 mesh 30.4. -20+80 mesh 20.1 -80 mesh 35.3
Percent by number in -80 mesh fraction +180 microns 0 l80+90 microns 0.6 -90+45 microns 1.1 45+l8 microns 5.2 l8 microns 93.1 Bulk density 51.2 lb./ft. Degree of compaction 0.79. Retardation of hydrostatic head 50 to 55 in. of
(accelerated). water. Thermal conductivity 0.06 B.t.u. ft./hr.
ft. X "F. Cone penetration 220.
In conclusion, it will be understood that this invention is directed to an improved insulation consisting of discrete hydrophobic particles of bituminous material chosen from the groups enumerated above, and which has been granulated, classified and blended to give specific proportions of particles in certain size ranges. It has been shown that these ranges are material to the success of the invention. Accordingly, all such sizes and proportions that come within the scope of the appended claims are intended to be embraced thereby.
I claim:
1. An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the particles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone, said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite'having a sintering temperature above the maximum temperature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the area Il-IBEI of the trilinear diagram of Figure 1.
2. An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the par ticles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone, said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite having a sintering temperature above the maximum temperature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the area ABEA of the trilinear diagram of Figure l.
3. An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the particles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone, said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite having a sintering temperature above the maximum temperature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the area ABCKDA of the tr'ilinear diagram of Figure 1.
4. An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the particles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone, said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite having a sintering temperature above the maximum term perature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the area GCKDFG of the trilinear diagram of Figure l.
5. An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the particles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone, said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite having a sintering temperature above the maximum temperature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the area AIHBA of the trilinear diagram of Figure 1.
6. An insulating body of granular material according to claim 3, which will have an accelerated water retardency of at least 15 inches when imposed at the rate of one inch in 5 minutes.
7. An insulating body of granular material according to claim 4, which will have an accelerated water retardency between about 15 and inches when imposed at the rate of one inch in 5 minutes.
8. An insulating body of discrete mobile particles of granular material for protecting underground piping from corrosion without such an application of heat to the particles as would form a sintered or consolidated zone, said material being chosen from the group consisting of natural asphaltites, asphaltic pyrobitumens and gilsonite having a sintering temperature above the maximum temperature attained by said piping, said particles having a screen analysis substantially within the values of the following table, expressed in percent by weight:
in which the mesh fraction includes particles down to and including 20 microns, and which will have an accelerated water retardency greater than about 24 inches when imposed at the rate of one inch in 5 minutes.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Cooke Dec. 9, 1941 Baker et al Feb. 2, 1954 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No.a 2,903,409 r September 8, 195% Park La Morse It is hereby certified that error appears in the-printed specification of the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.
Column 3, line 14, for "dotted read plotted Signed and sealed this 26th day of April 1960.
(SEAL) Attest:
KARL H. AXLINE ROBERT C. WATSON Attesting ()fficer Commissioner of Patents

Claims (1)

1. AN INSULATING BODY OF DISCRETE MOBLE PARTICLES OF GRANULAR MATERIAL FOR PROTECTING UNDERGROUND PIPING FROM CORROSION WITHOUT SUCH AN APPLICATION OF HEAT TO THE PARTICLES AS WOULD FORM A SINTERED OR CONSOLIDATED ZONE, SAID MATERIAL BEING CHOSEN FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF NATURAL ASPHALTITES, ASPHALITIC PYROBITUMENS AND GILSONITE HAVING A SNITERING TEMPERATUR ABOVE THE MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE ATTAINED BY SAID PIPING, SAID PARTICLES HAVING A SCREEN ANALYSIS SUBSTANTIALLY WITHIN THE AREA IHBEI OF THE TRILINEAR DIAGRAM OF FIGURE 1.
US2903409D Insulating and coskgsion protective Expired - Lifetime US2903409A (en)

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2903409A true US2903409A (en) 1959-09-08

Family

ID=3448749

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US2903409D Expired - Lifetime US2903409A (en) Insulating and coskgsion protective

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2903409A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3271924A (en) * 1963-09-03 1966-09-13 Great Lakes Carbon Corp Method of insulating cryogenic substances
US3639276A (en) * 1970-11-04 1972-02-01 Panacon Corp Corrosion-inhibiting thermal insulation for stainless steel
US3878087A (en) * 1968-04-04 1975-04-15 Kureha Chemical Ind Co Ltd Method for producing resinous pitch

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2265801A (en) * 1938-05-27 1941-12-09 Standard Oil Dev Co Method for transporting asphalt
US2668125A (en) * 1951-07-06 1954-02-02 American Gilsonite Co Method of insulating a metal structure and insulated metal structure

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2265801A (en) * 1938-05-27 1941-12-09 Standard Oil Dev Co Method for transporting asphalt
US2668125A (en) * 1951-07-06 1954-02-02 American Gilsonite Co Method of insulating a metal structure and insulated metal structure

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3271924A (en) * 1963-09-03 1966-09-13 Great Lakes Carbon Corp Method of insulating cryogenic substances
US3878087A (en) * 1968-04-04 1975-04-15 Kureha Chemical Ind Co Ltd Method for producing resinous pitch
US3639276A (en) * 1970-11-04 1972-02-01 Panacon Corp Corrosion-inhibiting thermal insulation for stainless steel

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Yang et al. Instability of sand–silt mixtures
Kim et al. Geotechnical properties of fly and bottom ash mixtures for use in highway embankments
Cabalar et al. Fall cone tests on clay–sand mixtures
Maghool et al. Laboratory evaluation of ladle furnace slag in unbound pavement-base/subbase applications
Prakash et al. Liquefaction of low plasticity silts
Taha et al. Influence of polypropylene fibre (PF) reinforcement on mechanical properties of clay soil
Proia et al. Experimental investigation of compacted sand-bentonite mixtures
Consoli et al. Assessing failure envelopes of soil–fly ash–lime blends
Eberemu Desiccation induced shrinkage of compacted tropical clay treated with rice husk ash
Sobti et al. Hydraulic conductivity and compressibility characteristics of bentonite enriched soils as a barrier material for landfills
US2903409A (en) Insulating and coskgsion protective
Hveem Sand-equivalent test for control of materials during construction
Henderson et al. Effects of particle size distribution and water content at compaction on saturated hydraulic conductivity and strength of high sand content root zone materials
Noda et al. Effects of fines content on cyclic shear characteristics of sand‐clay mixtures
USRE25757E (en) Percent-bo mesh
Islam et al. Effect of fine content on shear strength behavior of sandy soil
Sen et al. Soil stabilization using waste fiber materials
Kuvat et al. Experimental investigation of sand–rubber–bitumen mixtures as a geotechnical seismic isolation material
Ishii et al. Relationship Between Liquefaction Strength of Sand With Fine Fraction And Various Void Ratios
Wright et al. Observations on soil permeability, moulding moisture content and dry density relationships
Olaniyan et al. Influence of XL-bond nanochemical on strength indices of weak lateritic soil
Lollo Geotechnical Evaluation of Foundation Soils for a Building (Case Study of a Site in Jimma City, Southwestern Ethiopia)
Linn Lime-flyash Stabilization of Fine-grained Soils
Ossa et al. Dilation behaviour of asphalt mixtures
Akinola THE ROLE OF BORROW-PIT MATERIALS IN SUSTAINABLE ROAD CONSTRUCTION: INSIGHTS FROM BONNY