US20210390474A1

US20210390474A1 - Dashboard for multi site management system

Info

Publication number: US20210390474A1
Application number: US17/345,955
Authority: US
Inventors: Prabhat Ranjan; Khushrav Writer; Nithin Yadalla Ramgopal; Gutha Stalin Sanghamitra; Zhongshengyun Gao; Foong Yeen Chan; Sherene KURUVILLA; Ashu Rawat; Nitish Chopra; Gunjan Chanduka; Barnali Chetia
Original assignee: Honeywell International Inc
Current assignee: Honeywell International Inc
Priority date: 2020-06-15
Filing date: 2021-06-11
Publication date: 2021-12-16
Also published as: US20230213923A1; BR102021011646A2; AU2021204108A1; AU2021204108B2

Abstract

A multi-site Building Management System (BMS) monitors performance of a local BMS at each of a plurality of remote sites. The multi-site BMS includes a controller that is configured to determine a plurality of local performance metrics associated with each local BMS based on the operational data received from each local BMS and to aggregate like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics, resulting in a plurality of aggregated performance metrics. The controller is configured to display on the display a plurality of panels, to display in each of the plurality of panels the corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics and to display in each of the plurality of panels a ranking of one or more of the remote sites by their corresponding local performance metric.

Description

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/039,373, filed Jun. 15, 2020, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to building management systems, and more particularly to multi-site building management systems.

BACKGROUND

Portfolio managers may be responsible for monitoring tens, hundreds or even thousands of different building locations that may be spread out across different states or even across different nations. Each of the building locations may have a local building management system that provides data on alarms, energy conservation and the like. It can be difficult to easily spot potential problems occurring at a single building location, much less from a multitude of building management systems that are spread out geographically. It will be appreciated that the sheer volume of data, even if limited for example to active alarms, can be overwhelming. What would be desirable would be a multi-site management system that can help a portfolio manager manage the data coming in from a number of different building management systems.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure relates generally to helping a portfolio manager manage the sheer volume of data coming in from a number of different building management systems and assist the portfolio manager in quickly and efficiently detecting and responding to potential issues throughout the portfolio of buildings for which they are responsible. In an example, a multi-site Building Management System (BMS) monitors performance of a local BMS at each of a plurality of remote sites. This example multi-site BMS includes a port, a display and a controller that is operatively coupled to the display and the port. The port receives operational data from the local BMS of each of the plurality of remote sites. The controller is configured to determine a plurality of local performance metrics associated with the local BMS of each of the plurality of remote sites based on the operational data received from the local BMS of each of the plurality of remote sites. The controller is further configured to aggregate like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites, resulting in a plurality of aggregated performance metrics. The controller is further configured to display on the display a plurality of panels, each panel associated with a different one of the plurality of local performance metrics. The controller also displays in each of the plurality of panels the corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics. The controller also displays in each of the plurality of panels a ranking of one or more of the remote sites by their corresponding local performance metric, sometimes with outliers ranked first so they are easily identified and accessed.
In another example, a non-transient computer readable medium has instructions stored thereon. When the instructions are executed by a processor, the processor is caused to determine a plurality of local performance metrics associated with a local BMS of each of a plurality of remote sites based on operational data received from the local BMS of each of the plurality of remote sites. The processor is further caused to aggregate like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites, resulting in a plurality of aggregated performance metrics. The processor is further caused to display on the display a plurality of panels, each panel associated with a different one of the plurality of local performance metrics. The processor is further caused to display in each of the plurality of panels the corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics. The processor is also caused to allow a user to select one of the plurality of remote sites, and in response to selection of one of the plurality of remote sites, display a site view that includes at least some of the local performance metrics associated with the particular selected remote site.
In another example, a method monitors a performance of a local BMS at each of a plurality of remote sites. A plurality of local performance metrics associated with a local BMS of each of a plurality of remote sites are determined based on operational data received from the local BMS of each of the plurality of remote sites. Like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites are aggregated, resulting in a plurality of aggregated performance metrics. A plurality of panels are displayed on a display, each panel associated with a different one of the plurality of local performance metrics. The corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics are displayed in each of the plurality of panels. A ranking of one or more of the remote sites by their corresponding local performance metric is also displayed in each of the plurality of panels.
The preceding summary is provided to facilitate an understanding of some of the innovative features unique to the present disclosure and is not intended to be a full description. A full appreciation of the disclosure can be gained by taking the entire specification, claims, figures, and abstract as a whole.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The disclosure may be more completely understood in consideration of the following description of various examples in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an illustrative multi-site BMS operatively coupled to a number of remote sites;

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an illustrative multi-site BMS usable in the illustrative building system of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram showing an illustrative method using the illustrative multi-site BMS of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing an illustrative method using the illustrative multi-site BMS of FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing an illustrative method using the illustrative multi-site BMS of FIG. 2; and

FIGS. 6 through 11 are illustrative dashboard screens that may be generated by the illustrative multi-site BMS of FIG. 2.

While the disclosure is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the disclosure to the particular examples described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure.

DESCRIPTION

The following description should be read with reference to the drawings, in which like elements in different drawings are numbered in like fashion. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict examples that are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure. Although examples are illustrated for the various elements, those skilled in the art will recognize that many of the examples provided have suitable alternatives that may be utilized.
All numbers are herein assumed to be modified by the term “about”, unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. The recitation of numerical ranges by endpoints includes all numbers subsumed within that range (e.g., 1 to 5 includes 1, 1.5, 2, 2.75, 3, 3.80, 4, and 5).
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include the plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
It is noted that references in the specification to “an embodiment”, “some embodiments”, “other embodiments”, etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is contemplated that the feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is contemplated that the feature, structure, or characteristic may be applied to other embodiments whether or not explicitly described unless clearly stated to the contrary.
FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an illustrative building management system 10. In its broadest terms, the illustrative building management system 10 includes a multi-site BMS 12 and a plurality of remote sites 14 operatively coupled to the multi-site BMS. While a total of three remote sites 14 are shown, it will be appreciated that this is merely illustrative, as the multi-site BMS 12 may oversee and/or monitor operations of a large number of remote sites 14. The remote sites 14 may be distributed across a large geographic area. Each of the remote sites 14 are individually labeled as 14 a, 14 b, 14 c and may each represent any of a variety of different types of sites. While each of the remote sites 14 may be described herein as being buildings, this is not required in all cases. For example, some of the remote sites 14 may also represent factories or other processing facilities.
In the example shown, each of the remote sites 14 include a local BMS 16, individually labeled as 16 a, 16 b, 16 c. In some cases, some of the remote sites 14 may not include a local BMS 16. In such cases, the equipment 18, 20 and/or controllers (not illustrated) that control operation of the equipment 18, 20 may communicate directly with the gateway 22. In some cases, information pertaining to operation of the equipment 18, 20 may be accessible by logging into a local system (not illustrated), or even into the local controllers, with a local dashboard displayed on a web browser or a smart device such is a tablet or smart phone.
Each local BMS 16 may be considered as being operably coupled with a variety of different equipment 18, 20 that is located at the remote site 14. It will be appreciated that there will typically be many more pieces of equipment 18, 20 than the two that are illustrated at each remote site 14. The equipment 18, 20 is individually labeled as 18 a, 20 a, 18 b, 20 b, 18 c, 20 c, and may include Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system components. The equipment 18, 20 may include lighting system components, security system components, and the like. Each BMS 16 may be configured to receive operational data from the equipment 18, 20 and to formulate control commands for the equipment 18, 20 in response to the received operational data. Each local BMS 16 may be configured to enable local control of the equipment 18, 20, as well as local monitoring of the equipment 18, 20.
In some cases, the local BMS 16 may be configured to provide operational data to the multi-site BMS 12. In order to communicate with the multi-site BMS 12, in some cases each of the remote sites 14 may include a gateway 22, individually labeled as 22 a, 22 b, 22 c. The gateways 22, if present, may provide a way by which each local BMS 16 can communicate with the multi-site BMS 12. The gateways 22 may provide a means for operational data to be uploaded from each local BMS 16 to the multi-site BMS 12 as well as control commands to be downloaded from the multi-site BMS 12 to each local BMS 16. In some cases, the gateways 22 may be configured to download software packages from the multi-site BMS 12 that better configures each local BMS 16 for communication with the multi-site BMS 12.
FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of the illustrative multi-site BMS 12. The multi-site BMS 12 may be considered as being configured to monitor the performance of the local BMS 16 at each of the remote sites 14. The multi-site BMS 12 includes a port 24 that is configured to receive operational data from the local BMS 16 at each of the remote sites 14. The multi-site BMS includes a display 26 and a controller 28 that is operatively coupled to the port 24 and to the display 26. The controller 28 may be configured to determine a plurality of local performance metrics associated with the local BMS 16 of each of the plurality of remote sites 14 based on the operational data received from the local BMS 16 of each of the plurality of remote sites 14. One of the local performance metrics may be associated with alarms that are issued by the local BMS 16. Another of the local performance metrics may be associated with comfort provided by the local BMS 16. Another of the local performance metrics may be associated with energy usage by the local BMS 16. These are just examples.
The controller 28 may be configured to aggregate like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14, resulting in a plurality of aggregated performance metrics. For example, the local performance metrics associated with alarms from each of the remote sites may be rolled up or aggregated into one or more aggregated performance metrics associated with alarms. Aggregating may, for example, include one or more of averaging like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14 or summing like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14. Alternatively, or in addition, aggregating may include computing a score based on like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14 and/or ranking like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14. These are just examples.
The controller 28 may display on the display 26 a plurality of panels, each panel associated with a different one of the plurality of local performance metrics. The controller 28 may also display in each panel the corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics. In some cases, the controller 28 may display in each of the plurality of panels a ranking of one or more of the remote sites 14 by their corresponding local performance metric.
In some cases, a first one of the plurality of panels that are displayed on the display 26 may be associated with a first local performance metric that is associated with alarms that are issued by the local BMS 16. A second one of the plurality of panels that are displayed on the display 26 may be associated with a second local performance metric that is associated with comfort provided by the local BMS 16. A third one of the plurality of panels that are displayed on the display 26 may be associated with a third local performance metric that is associated with energy usage by the local BMS 16. These are just examples.
In some instances, the controller 28 may be configured to process each of the plurality of local performance metrics of each of the plurality of remote sites 14 to identify those that do not meet a predefined criteria. The controller 28 may be configured to classify each of the plurality of local performance metrics of each of the plurality of remote sites 14 that do not meet the predefined criteria as needing attention. In some cases, the controller 28 may be configured to aggregate like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14 that are classified as needing attention, and display an indication of the aggregation of those needing attention on the corresponding one of the plurality of panels.
In some cases, the controller 28 may be configured to display a map view adjacent the plurality of panels, wherein the map view displays a geographical location of at least some of the plurality of remote sites 14. The controller 28 may allow a user to select a sub-set of the plurality of remote sites 14 on the map view, and in response, aggregate like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from only the sub-set of the plurality of remote sites 14, and display in each of the plurality of panels the corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics for only the sub-set of the plurality of remote sites.
The controller 28 may be configured to allow a user to select one of the plurality of remote sites 14 and, in response to selection of one of the plurality of remote sites 14, display a site view that includes at least some of the local performance metrics associated with the particular selected remote site 14. In some cases, the controller 28 is also configured to, in response to selection of one of the plurality of remote sites 14, display performance indicators associated with one or more pieces of equipment 18, 20 that are part of the local BMS 16 at the selected remote site and to allow a user to select one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20 that are part of the local BMS 16 at the selected remote site 14. In response to selection of one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20 that are part of the local BMS 16 at the selected remote site 14, the controller 28 is configured to display an equipment view that includes additional information associated with the operation of the to select one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20. In some cases, the additional information associated with the operation of the selected one of the pieces of equipment may include one or more alarms issued by the selected one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20, sensor values associated with the operation of the select one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20, control signals associated with the operation of the select one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20, and/or a schedule associated with the select one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20.
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram showing an illustrative method 30 that may be carried out by the multi-site BMS 12. A plurality of local performance metrics associated with a local BMS of each of a plurality of remote sites 14 is determined based on operational data received from the local BMS 16 of each of the plurality of remote sites 14, as indicated at block 32. Like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14 are aggregated, resulting in a plurality of aggregated performance metrics, as indicated at block 34. A plurality of panels are displayed on the display 26, each panel being associated with a different one of the plurality of local performance metrics, as indicated at block 36. The corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics are displayed in each of the plurality of panels, as indicated at block 38.
As an example, a first one of the plurality of panels may be associated with a first local performance metric such as alarms that are issued by the local BMS 16. A second one of the plurality of panels may be associated with a second local performance metric such as comfort provided by the local BMS 16. A third one of the plurality of panels may be associated with a third local performance metric such as energy usage by the local BMS 16. A user is allowed to select one of the plurality of remote sites 14, as indicated at block 40. In response to selection of one of the plurality of remote sites 14, a site view is displayed that includes at least some of the local performance metrics associated with the particular selected remote site 14, as indicated at block 42.
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing an illustrative method 50 that may be carried out by the multi-site BMS 12. A plurality of local performance metrics associated with a local BMS of each of a plurality of remote sites 14 is determined based on operational data received from the local BMS 16 of each of the plurality of remote sites 14, as indicated at block 32. Like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14 are aggregated, resulting in a plurality of aggregated performance metrics, as indicated at block 34. A plurality of panels are displayed on the display 26, each panel being associated with a different one of the plurality of local performance metrics, as indicated at block 36. The corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics are displayed in each of the plurality of panels, as indicated at block 38. A user is allowed to select one of the plurality of remote sites 14, as indicated at block 40.
In response to selection of one of the plurality of remote sites 14, performance indicators associated with one or more pieces of equipment 18, 20 that are part of the local BMS 16 at the selected remote site 14 are displayed, as indicated at block 52. A user is allowed to select one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20 that are part of the local BMS 16 at the selected remote site 14, as indicated at block 54. In response to selection of one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20 that are part of the local BMS 16 at the selected remote site 14, an equipment view is displayed that includes additional information associated with the operation of the selected one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20, as indicated at block 56. In some cases, the additional information associated with the operation of the selected one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20 may include one or more of alarms issued by the selected one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20, sensor values associated with the operation of the select one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20, control signals associated with the operation of the select one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20 and a schedule associated with the select one of the pieces of equipment 18, 20.
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing an illustrative method 60 for monitoring a performance of a local BMS 16 at each of a plurality of remote sites 14. A plurality of local performance metrics associated with a local BMS 16 of each of a plurality of remote sites 14 are determined based on operational data received from the local BMS 16 of each of the plurality of remote sites 14, as indicated at block 62. Like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14 are aggregated, resulting in a plurality of aggregated performance metrics, as indicated at block 64. In some cases, aggregating includes one or more of averaging like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14 or summing like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14. Aggregating may also include one or more of computing a score based on like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14 and ranking like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites 14.
A plurality of panels are displayed on the display 26, each panel associated with a different one of the plurality of local performance metrics, as indicated at block 66. The corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics are displayed in each of the plurality of panels, as indicated at block 68. A ranking of one or more of the remote sites 14 by their corresponding local performance metric are displayed, at indicated at block 70.
FIGS. 6 through 11 are screen shots showing examples of some of the screens that may be generated by the multi-site BMS 12. FIG. 6 shows a portfolio level dashboard 80. In some cases, as illustrated, the portfolio level dashboard 80 includes a map 82 that shows a geographic area in which a number of remote sites 14 are located. As shown, the map 82 includes several icons 84 that each represent one or more remote sites 14. For example, an icon 84 a represents a total of four remote sites 14, an icon 84 b represents a total of three remote sites 14, an icon 84 c represents a single remote site 14, an icon 84 d represents a total of two remote sites 14 and an icon 84 e represents a single remote site 14. Each of the icons 84 may be selected in order to view additional information regarding the remote sites 14 that are represented by the particular icon 84.
In some cases, the icons 84 may be color coded. For example, a first color may represent alarms, a second color may represent comfort and a third color may represent energy. In some instances, different colors may be used to represent varying degrees of seriousness. For example, red may be used to indicate that there is a serious alarm at one of the remote sites 14 while yellow may be used to indicate a less serious alarm at one of the remote sites 14. Various colors may be used to indicate how many problems are detected at a particular remote site 14, for example.
The portfolio level dashboard 80 includes a number of panels. As illustrated, the portfolio level dashboard 80 includes an Alarm panel 86, a Comfort panel 88 and an Energy panel 90. In some instances, a user may determine that they are not interested in comfort, for example, and the controller 28 may be configured to no longer display the Comfort panel 88. This is just an example. The Alarm panel 86 may include a Reported Alarms icon 92 that shows how many alarms have been reported, an Active Alarms icon 94 that shows how many alarms are currently active and an Alarms Listing icon 96 that provides a listing of how many high alarms, how many medium alarms and how many low alarms are present. The Alarm panel 86 also includes a listing 98 of the site rankings of the remote sites 14 reporting alarms. The listing 98 may be sorted, if desired, to reveal superior performing sites and/or underperforming sites based on total number of alarms, number of unresolved alarms, number of serious alarms, frequency of alarms, average time taken to resolve an alarm, and or any other suitable criteria.
In the example shown, the Comfort panel 88 includes an overall Comfort Score icon 100 that provides a visual indication of an overall comfort score of the remote sites. The Comfort panel 88 also includes a listing 102 of the parameters being used to determine the overall comfort score. As shown, the overall comfort score is based at least in part upon an average temperature score, a humidity score and a carbon dioxide (CO₂) score. The Comfort panel 88 also includes a listing 104 of particular sites contributing to the overall comfort score. The listing 104 may be sorted, if desired, to reveal superior performing sites and/or underperforming sites. For example, each remote site may have a computed local comfort score based on the performance of the local BMS, and the listing 104 may be sorted by the local comfort score of each site. This is just one example.
In the example shown, the Energy panel 90 includes an Excess Use icon 106 that shows how many sites are reporting excessive energy usage, a Factory Default Schedule icon 108 that shows how many sites are using a factory default schedule and a Manual Override icon 110 that shows how many sites are operating under a manual override. The Energy panel 90 also includes a listing 112 that shows the sites contributing to the Excess Use icon 106, the Factory Default Schedule icon 108 and the Manual Override icon 110. The listing 112 may be sorted, if desired, to reveal superior performing sites and/or underperforming sites.
In the example shown, each of the Alarm panel 86, the Comfort panel 88 and the Energy panel 90 include a Current button 114 and Trend button 116. The Current button 114 may be selected to display current information (as is shown in FIG. 6). The Trend button 116 may be selected to display historical data including historical trends. In some cases, historical data may be shown in graphical form within the appropriate panel such as the Alarm panel 86, the Comfort panel 88 and the Energy panel 90.
In some cases, it is possible to toggle between the portfolio level dashboard 80 shown in FIG. 6 with a map view and a portfolio dashboard 120 with a list view. An example list view is shown in FIG. 7. The portfolio level dashboards 80, 120 include a map view icon 122 and a list view icon 124. It can be seen that in FIG. 6, the map view icon 122 has been selected while in FIG. 7, the list view icon 124 has been selected. The portfolio level dashboard 120 in list view includes a row 126 that provides information as to the number of sites, how many sites are offline, how many are currently in alarm, how many are currently using too much energy, and the like.
The portfolio level dashboard 120 in list view includes a Sites column 128, an Alarm total column 130, an Active High Alarm column 132, a Comfort Score column 134, a Temperature Score column 136, a Humidity Score column 138, a CO2 Score column 140, an Excess Use column 142, a Factory Default Schedule column 144, a Manual Override column 146 and an Override Duration column 148. It will be appreciated that much of the information provided in the portfolio level dashboard 80 in map view is also shown in the portfolio level dashboard 120 in list view. A point of interest in the Site column 128 is that sites are organized in a hierarchal manner, with individual components listed under their corresponding header. For example, the header LDS 7350 High River has been expanded to reveal Chapel, F3 RS RM Bishop, and so on. In the example shown, Chapel, F3 RS RM Bishop are each individual pieces of equipment (e.g. a rooftop unit) at the LDS 7350 High River site.
FIG. 8 shows a site level dashboard 160 that shows an equipment list view while FIG. 9 shows a site level dashboard 190 that shows a device list view. The site level dashboards 160, 190 may be reached by selecting the site on the portfolio level dashboard. In some cases, a user may enter a search query into the multi-site BMS to identify a desired remote site, and then select the site to reach the desired site level dashboards 160, 190. These are just example.
In the example shown, once the site level dashboard 160, 190 is reached, a user is able to select between the equipment list view and the device list view by toggling either an equipment view icon 162 or a device list view icon 164. The site level dashboard 160 allows a user to see all of the equipment at a particular site in a single list that allows the user to switch between different equipment types such as but not limited to RTU (roof top units), VRF (variable refrigerant flow units) and AHU (air handling units). As illustrated, roof top units have been selected. The site level dashboard 160 includes a Name column 166, a Current Status column 168, an Active High Alarm column 170, a Current Temperature column 172, an Effective Setpoint column 174, a Humidity column 176, an Excess Runtime column 178, a Manual Override Duration column 180 and a Current Schedule column 182.
The site level dashboard 190 with the device list view icon 164 selected shows information for devices such as sensors, lighting and the like. FIG. 9 shows a sensor summary list. The site level dashboard 190 includes a Name column 192, a Zone column 194, a Current Status column 196, an Active Alarm column 198, a Current Value column 200, an RSSI column 202, a Battery column 204 and a Firmware Update column 206.
FIG. 10 provides an example of an equipment level dashboard 220 that allows a user to monitor, command and control the current status, parameter values and/or control signals for a selected piece of equipment. In some cases, a multiple objects trend view allows visualization of each parameter over time. This can provide for improved user interaction and interpretation for better trouble shooting. Scheduling of the equipment can also be seen. In some cases, the equipment level dashboard 220 may be configured to have a generic design that can adapt to any of a variety of different types of equipment without requiring additional configuration. The equipment level dashboard 220 may be reached by selecting the appropriate piece of equipment on the site level dashboard 160, for example.
As noted, in some cases, the user may be able to specify which panels are displayed on the portfolio level dashboard 80. FIG. 11 provides a screen 240 that may be used to specify whether the Comfort panel 88 is displayed. Similar screens may be displayed (not shown) to specify whether the Alarms panel 86 and/or the Energy panel 90 will be displayed. The screen 240 includes a slider 242 that may be switched between enable and disable. If enabled, the Comfort panel 88 will be displayed. If disabled, the Comfort panel 88 will not be displayed. In some cases, if the Comfort panel 88 is not displayed, the other panels such as the Alarms panel 86 and the Energy panel 90 may be displayed over a larger portion of the screen. The screen 240 also includes a section 244 that allows the user to select alarm limits for comfort. The screen 240 also includes a section 246 that allows the user to select which particular parameters will be included in calculating overall scores.
Having thus described several illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure, those of skill in the art will readily appreciate that yet other embodiments may be made and used within the scope of the claims hereto attached. It will be understood, however, that this disclosure is, in many respects, only illustrative. Changes may be made in details, particularly in matters of shape, size, arrangement of parts, and exclusion and order of steps, without exceeding the scope of the disclosure. The disclosure's scope is, of course, defined in the language in which the appended claims are expressed.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A multi-site Building Management System (BMS) for monitoring a performance of a local BMS at each of a plurality of remote sites, the multi-site BMS comprising:

a port for receiving operational data from the local BMS of each of the plurality of remote sites;

a display;

a controller operatively coupled to the display and the port, the controller configured to:

determine a plurality of local performance metrics associated with the local BMS of each of the plurality of remote sites based on the operational data received from the local BMS of each of the plurality of remote sites;

aggregate like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites, resulting in a plurality of aggregated performance metrics;

display on the display a plurality of panels, each panel associated with a different one of the plurality of local performance metrics;

display in each of the plurality of panels the corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics;

display in each of the plurality of panels a ranking of one or more of the remote sites by their corresponding local performance metric.

2. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 1, wherein aggregating comprises one or more of:

averaging like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites;

summing like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites;

computing a score based on like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites; and

ranking like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites.

3. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 1, wherein the controller is further configured to process each of the plurality of local performance metrics of each of the plurality of remote sites to identify those that do not meet a predefined criteria.

4. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 3, wherein the controller is further configured to classify each of the plurality of local performance metrics of each of the plurality of remote sites that do not meet the predefined criteria as needing attention.

5. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 2, wherein the controller is further configured to aggregate like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites that are classified as needing attention, and display an indication of the aggregation of those needing attention on the corresponding one of the plurality of panels.

6. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 1, wherein the controller is further configured to display a map view adjacent the plurality of panels, wherein the map view displays a geographical location of at least some of the plurality of remote sites.

7. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 6, wherein the controller is further configured to allow a user to select a sub-set of the plurality of remote sites on the map view, and in response, aggregate like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from only the sub-set of the plurality of remote sites, and display in each of the plurality of panels the corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics for only the sub-set of the plurality of remote sites.

8. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 1, wherein one of the local performance metrics is associated with alarms issued by the local BMS.

9. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 1, wherein one of the local performance metrics is associated with comfort provided by the local BMS.

10. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 1, wherein one of the local performance metrics is associated with energy usage by the local BMS.

11. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 1, wherein:

a first one of the plurality of panels is associated with a first local performance metric, and the first local performance metric is associated with alarms issued by the local BMS;

a second one of the plurality of panels is associated with a second local performance metric, and the second local performance metric is associated with comfort provided by the local BMS; and

a third one of the plurality of panels is associated with a third local performance metric, and the third local performance metric is associated with energy usage by the local BMS.

12. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 1, wherein the controller is further configured to:

allow a user to select one of the plurality of remote sites; and

in response to selection of one of the plurality of remote sites, display a site view that includes at least some of the local performance metrics associated with the particular selected remote site.

13. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 12, wherein the controller is further configured to:

in response to selection of one of the plurality of remote sites, display performance indicators associated with one or more pieces of equipment that are part of the local BMS at the selected remote site;

allow a user to select one of the pieces of equipment that are part of the local BMS at the selected remote site; and

in response to selection of one of the pieces of equipment that are part of the local BMS at the selected remote site, display an equipment view that includes additional information associated with the operation of the to select one of the pieces of equipment.

14. The multi-site Building Management System (BMS) of claim 13, wherein the additional information associated with the operation of the to select one of the pieces of equipment includes one or more alarms issued by the selected one of the pieces of equipment, sensor values associated with the operation of the select one of the pieces of equipment, control signals associated with the operation of the select one of the pieces of equipment and a schedule associated with the select one of the pieces of equipment.

15. A non-transient computer readable medium storing thereon instructions that when executed by a processor cause the processor to:

determine a plurality of local performance metrics associated with a local BMS of each of a plurality of remote sites based on operational data received from the local BMS of each of the plurality of remote sites;

display on the display a plurality of panels, each panel associated with a different one of the plurality of local performance metrics; and

allow a user to select one of the plurality of remote sites; and

16. The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

in response to selection of one of the pieces of equipment that are part of the local BMS at the selected remote site, display an equipment view that includes additional information associated with the operation of the selected one of the pieces of equipment.

17. The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 16, wherein the additional information associated with the operation of the selected one of the pieces of equipment includes one or more alarms issued by the selected one of the pieces of equipment, sensor values associated with the operation of the select one of the pieces of equipment, control signals associated with the operation of the select one of the pieces of equipment and a schedule associated with the select one of the pieces of equipment.

18. The non-transient computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein:

19. A method for monitoring a performance of a local BMS at each of a plurality of remote sites, the method comprising:

determining a plurality of local performance metrics associated with a local BMS of each of a plurality of remote sites based on operational data received from the local BMS of each of the plurality of remote sites;

aggregating like ones of the plurality of local performance metrics from the plurality of remote sites, resulting in a plurality of aggregated performance metrics;

displaying on a display a plurality of panels, each panel associated with a different one of the plurality of local performance metrics; and

displaying in each of the plurality of panels the corresponding one of the plurality of aggregated performance metrics;

displaying in each of the plurality of panels a ranking of one or more of the remote sites by their corresponding local performance metric.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein aggregating comprises one or more of: