[go: up one dir, main page]

US20150194965A1 - Capacitively coupled logic gate - Google Patents

Capacitively coupled logic gate Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150194965A1
US20150194965A1 US14/665,429 US201514665429A US2015194965A1 US 20150194965 A1 US20150194965 A1 US 20150194965A1 US 201514665429 A US201514665429 A US 201514665429A US 2015194965 A1 US2015194965 A1 US 2015194965A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
function
gate
capacitive coupling
terminal
logic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/665,429
Inventor
David K.Y. Liu
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Jonker LLC
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US14/665,429 priority Critical patent/US20150194965A1/en
Publication of US20150194965A1 publication Critical patent/US20150194965A1/en
Assigned to JONKER LLC reassignment JONKER LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LIU, DAVID K.Y.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03KPULSE TECHNIQUE
    • H03K19/00Logic circuits, i.e. having at least two inputs acting on one output; Inverting circuits
    • H03K19/20Logic circuits, i.e. having at least two inputs acting on one output; Inverting circuits characterised by logic function, e.g. AND, OR, NOR, NOT circuits
    • H03K19/23Majority or minority circuits, i.e. giving output having the state of the majority or the minority of the inputs
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03KPULSE TECHNIQUE
    • H03K19/00Logic circuits, i.e. having at least two inputs acting on one output; Inverting circuits
    • H03K19/02Logic circuits, i.e. having at least two inputs acting on one output; Inverting circuits using specified components
    • H03K19/173Logic circuits, i.e. having at least two inputs acting on one output; Inverting circuits using specified components using elementary logic circuits as components
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10BELECTRONIC MEMORY DEVICES
    • H10B41/00Electrically erasable-and-programmable ROM [EEPROM] devices comprising floating gates
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10DINORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
    • H10D84/00Integrated devices formed in or on semiconductor substrates that comprise only semiconducting layers, e.g. on Si wafers or on GaAs-on-Si wafers
    • H10D84/90Masterslice integrated circuits
    • H10D84/903Masterslice integrated circuits comprising field effect technology

Definitions

  • the present disclosure pertains to semiconductor logic gates, particularly those which can be implemented using capacitive coupling.
  • the '668 patent discloses a new type of single-poly non-volatile memory device structure that can be operated either as an OTP (one time programmable) or as an MTP (multiple time programmable) memory cell.
  • the device is programmed using hot electron injection. It also has a structure that is fully compatible with advanced CMOS logic process, and would require, at the worst case, very minimal additional steps to implement. Other unique aspects of the device are described in the '668 patent as well.
  • An object of the present invention is to extend the use of capacitive coupling to specific types of logic devices and circuits.
  • a plurality of areal capacitive coupling devices are coupled to process a set of data inputs; each is preferably configured such that a floating gate potential of such device can be altered in response to receiving an input signal from the set of data inputs; the floating gate potential can be adjusted to place the areal capacitive coupling device into a first state or a second state through areal capacitive coupling to a potential associated with a first active region receiving the input signal; the areal capacitive coupling devices as interconnected generate a first logic output which is a first logical function associated with the set of data inputs.
  • Other objects of the invention include methods of operating a dual function gate in which the device performs a different circuit function depending on a level is of an input signal applied to such logic gate;
  • a further object is to provide an electronic circuit in which logic gates can also be imbued with a memory function to allow for dual functionality.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a preferred embodiment of a circuit implementing a 3-input majority function.
  • FIG. 2 depicts the Load Line characteristics of the 3-Input Capacitive Coupling Device and Pull Down transistor shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the '668 gate/drain overlap device using areal capacitive coupling can be used in non-memory applications as well.
  • the device's unique characteristics can be used to efficiently implement a number of CMOS logic functions, including, preferably, one of the most device consuming and yet useful—the Majority Function.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a preferred implementation of a 3-input majority function logic gate 100 implemented with three (3) '668 capacitive coupling devices (shown at the top of the figure as 10 A, 10 B and 10 C) along with standard CMOS transistors (including a pair of inverters on the right — 20 A/ 20 B, and a conventional N MOS pulldown FET 30 ) at the bottom).
  • CMOS transistors including a pair of inverters on the right — 20 A/ 20 B, and a conventional N MOS pulldown FET 30 .
  • FIG. 2 The output voltage characteristics, with the capacitive coupling devices as load lines, of the above 3 input circuit is illustrated in FIG. 2 .
  • the intersecting point will yield an output voltage that is higher than the VIH of the inverter circuit ( 20 A/ 20 B), and will allow the output of the voltage after the two inverter stage to be high, fulfilling a majority function.
  • the transistor count saving, and the subsequent silicon area saving become geometrically larger when the number of inputs for the majority function increases. For example, for a 5-input majority function, only 5 capacitive coupling devices, 1 matched pull-down transistor, and 2 pair of NMOS and PMOS transistors for 2-stage inverter circuit are required. In general, for any N input majority function gate, the device count will be N capacitive coupling devices and an additional set of 5 support transistors.
  • the capacitive coupling device implementation of a logic gate is advantageous is that a conventional N-channel floating gate device would not be able to turn on if the drain coupling is not high enough to overcome the Vt of the NMOS device.
  • the present device has a high coupling ratio to allow sufficient voltage coupled to the floating gate to turn on the device in accordance with a target/nominal Vt implant process used in the IC manufacturing flow.
  • the majority function can be implemented in an alternative embodiment in which the invention is taken to an extreme and 100% coupling is used, i.e., such as to effectuate a form of NMOS gated diode (e.g., NMOS with gate connected to the drain directly).
  • NMOS gated diode e.g., NMOS with gate connected to the drain directly.
  • the disadvantage of this approach is that it removes one degree of process freedom, in that the only remaining mechanism to control the switching/output of the device is through adjusting the nominal Vt for the device, a tradeoff that may result in compatability problems with the CMOS parameters of other devices in the integrated circuit, as well as complicate the matching of the logic circuit output to the pulldown FET characteristics.
  • a capacitive coupling device implementation with less than 100% coupling offers an advantage over a pure NMOS gated diode implementation, since the output current of the capacitive coupling device can be tailored specifically through the coupling capacitance, without altering the baseline CMOS process parameters (such as Vt) used by other logic circuits, and allowing the logic function to be implemented optimally to other related circuit elements, such as the pulldown FET.
  • the present invention affords a more flexible technique to implement a logic function since a nominal logic gate Vt and related process parameters can be used as a driver to determine sizings of the gates/active regions, and the extent of the coupling ratio ( ⁇ ) that should be used for any particular circuit.
  • variants of the invention can include hardwired logic (i.e., a PLD, programmable logic) and conventional CMOS logic functions, albeit more efficient in device counts.
  • hardwired logic i.e., a PLD, programmable logic
  • CMOS logic functions albeit more efficient in device counts.
  • Another advantage of using the preferred embodiment of this invention is that the situation where an input to the majority function may no longer be valid can be addressed with the use of capacitive coupled devices as described in '668. If an input is no longer needed, the associated capacitive coupled device is can be programmed to be off and be removed from being considered in the output of the logic function. That is, any one or more of the logic devices in the circuit can be configured effectively by a function select signal.
  • the function select signal can apply a potential to the logic device so that it instead behaves as a quasi-memory device. That is, the device behaves effectively like a memory gate, not a logic gate, when the floating gate is raised to a sufficiently high potential.
  • the output or function can be hardwired or burned in during manufacturing. This can be accomplished by predetermined programming respective inputs to the logic gates, to configure them into an erased or programmed state as desired.
  • circuits of the capacitive coupled dual function devices can be employed of course, and the invention is not limited in this respect.
  • Many types of conventional circuits are expected to benefit from devices which can adjust their behavior dynamically in response to a function select signal.
  • a majority function circuit can be altered to render a majority function for any subset of the inputs. For example, even with maximum of 5 inputs, one can still program the circuit to be a majority function of any of the 3 inputs. With a set of 7 inputs one can consider the state of a selected subset of 5 inputs, and so on. Other variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
  • This advantageous feature could potentially offer a significant saving in the circuit design since costly revision of the silicon design and its associated process cost can be avoided.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Logic Circuits (AREA)

Abstract

An electronic logic circuit uses areal capacitive coupling devices coupled together to process a set of data inputs. Each areal capacitive coupling device can be configured such that a floating gate potential of such device can be altered to at least a first state or a second state in response to receiving an input signal from the set of data inputs, which is coupled electrically to the floating gate. A majority function logic circuit (and other similar circuits) can be interconnected this way using far fewer gates than with a conventional CMOS implementation. Selective logic gates can also be enabled or disabled by configuring them effectively as memory devices.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/233,767, filed Sep. 15, 2011, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of the priority date of Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/383,128 filed Sep. 15, 2010. Both of those applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present disclosure pertains to semiconductor logic gates, particularly those which can be implemented using capacitive coupling.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Reference is made to U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,782,668 and 7,787,295 and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/264,029, 12/264,060, 12/264,076, 12/271,647, 12,271,666 and 12/271,680 all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
  • The '668 patent discloses a new type of single-poly non-volatile memory device structure that can be operated either as an OTP (one time programmable) or as an MTP (multiple time programmable) memory cell. The device is programmed using hot electron injection. It also has a structure that is fully compatible with advanced CMOS logic process, and would require, at the worst case, very minimal additional steps to implement. Other unique aspects of the device are described in the '668 patent as well.
  • SUMMARY OF INVENTION
  • An object of the present invention is to extend the use of capacitive coupling to specific types of logic devices and circuits.
  • In accordance with this object a plurality of areal capacitive coupling devices are coupled to process a set of data inputs; each is preferably configured such that a floating gate potential of such device can be altered in response to receiving an input signal from the set of data inputs; the floating gate potential can be adjusted to place the areal capacitive coupling device into a first state or a second state through areal capacitive coupling to a potential associated with a first active region receiving the input signal; the areal capacitive coupling devices as interconnected generate a first logic output which is a first logical function associated with the set of data inputs.
  • Other objects of the invention include methods of operating a dual function gate in which the device performs a different circuit function depending on a level is of an input signal applied to such logic gate;
  • Another object is to provide a logic gate with N inputs and in which a selected set M of inputs (M<=N−2) can be considered for purposes of determining a logical majority function.
  • A further object is to provide an electronic circuit in which logic gates can also be imbued with a memory function to allow for dual functionality.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 depicts a preferred embodiment of a circuit implementing a 3-input majority function.
  • FIG. 2 depicts the Load Line characteristics of the 3-Input Capacitive Coupling Device and Pull Down transistor shown in FIG. 1.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Applicant has discovered that the '668 gate/drain overlap device using areal capacitive coupling (hereinafter referred to as the “capacitive coupling device”) can be used in non-memory applications as well. As discussed herein, the device's unique characteristics can be used to efficiently implement a number of CMOS logic functions, including, preferably, one of the most device consuming and yet useful—the Majority Function.
  • FIG. 1 below illustrates a preferred implementation of a 3-input majority function logic gate 100 implemented with three (3) '668 capacitive coupling devices (shown at the top of the figure as 10A, 10B and 10C) along with standard CMOS transistors (including a pair of inverters on the right —20A/20B, and a conventional N MOS pulldown FET 30) at the bottom). It will be understood by those skilled in the art that other combinations and connections of devices could is be used to effectuate the same result of the exemplary gate shown in FIG. 1, including of course for larger numbers of inputs.
  • The output voltage characteristics, with the capacitive coupling devices as load lines, of the above 3 input circuit is illustrated in FIG. 2. As can be seen from the figure, if 2 or more (a majority) of the inputs to devices 10A/10B/10C are conducting, the intersecting point will yield an output voltage that is higher than the VIH of the inverter circuit (20A/20B), and will allow the output of the voltage after the two inverter stage to be high, fulfilling a majority function.
  • Conversely, if only one or none of the inputs (not majority) is conducting, the output voltage is below VIL, and will not be able to trigger the inverter. This is how a 3-input majority function is preferably implemented; namely with 3 capacitive coupling devices, 1 pull-down transistor, and 2 pair of NMOS and PMOS transistors for 2 inverter circuits. All of these devices are conventional, and to ensure adequate margin of operation it is preferable to perform simulations to select and match the size of the various transistors. This can be accomplished using any number of well-known design tools, and is commonly done in providing logic cell libraries, so it is well within the skill of the ordinary artisan without undue experimentation.
  • The transistor count saving, and the subsequent silicon area saving, become geometrically larger when the number of inputs for the majority function increases. For example, for a 5-input majority function, only 5 capacitive coupling devices, 1 matched pull-down transistor, and 2 pair of NMOS and PMOS transistors for 2-stage inverter circuit are required. In general, for any N input majority function gate, the device count will be N capacitive coupling devices and an additional set of 5 support transistors.
  • One reason that using the capacitive coupling device implementation of a logic gate is advantageous is that a conventional N-channel floating gate device would not be able to turn on if the drain coupling is not high enough to overcome the Vt of the NMOS device. The present device has a high coupling ratio to allow sufficient voltage coupled to the floating gate to turn on the device in accordance with a target/nominal Vt implant process used in the IC manufacturing flow.
  • Persons skilled in the art will appreciate from the present teachings that the majority function can be implemented in an alternative embodiment in which the invention is taken to an extreme and 100% coupling is used, i.e., such as to effectuate a form of NMOS gated diode (e.g., NMOS with gate connected to the drain directly). The disadvantage of this approach is that it removes one degree of process freedom, in that the only remaining mechanism to control the switching/output of the device is through adjusting the nominal Vt for the device, a tradeoff that may result in compatability problems with the CMOS parameters of other devices in the integrated circuit, as well as complicate the matching of the logic circuit output to the pulldown FET characteristics.
  • A capacitive coupling device implementation with less than 100% coupling offers an advantage over a pure NMOS gated diode implementation, since the output current of the capacitive coupling device can be tailored specifically through the coupling capacitance, without altering the baseline CMOS process parameters (such as Vt) used by other logic circuits, and allowing the logic function to be implemented optimally to other related circuit elements, such as the pulldown FET. Thus the present invention affords a more flexible technique to implement a logic function since a nominal logic gate Vt and related process parameters can be used as a driver to determine sizings of the gates/active regions, and the extent of the coupling ratio (∀) that should be used for any particular circuit.
  • Other variants of the invention can include hardwired logic (i.e., a PLD, programmable logic) and conventional CMOS logic functions, albeit more efficient in device counts. By allowing embedding of the device within a CMOS process, one can implement a “hardwired” look-up table to implement some logic function, much like an FPGA.
  • Another advantage of using the preferred embodiment of this invention is that the situation where an input to the majority function may no longer be valid can be addressed with the use of capacitive coupled devices as described in '668. If an input is no longer needed, the associated capacitive coupled device is can be programmed to be off and be removed from being considered in the output of the logic function. That is, any one or more of the logic devices in the circuit can be configured effectively by a function select signal. The function select signal can apply a potential to the logic device so that it instead behaves as a quasi-memory device. That is, the device behaves effectively like a memory gate, not a logic gate, when the floating gate is raised to a sufficiently high potential. This has the effect of turning the device off (i.e., rendering it non-conductive) and thus selectively enabling or disabling its participation in a circuit logic function. In some embodiments the output or function can be hardwired or burned in during manufacturing. This can be accomplished by predetermined programming respective inputs to the logic gates, to configure them into an erased or programmed state as desired.
  • Other variations of circuits of the capacitive coupled dual function devices can be employed of course, and the invention is not limited in this respect. Many types of conventional circuits are expected to benefit from devices which can adjust their behavior dynamically in response to a function select signal.
  • Thus certain embodiments of the present invention can be implemented so that a majority function circuit can be altered to render a majority function for any subset of the inputs. For example, even with maximum of 5 inputs, one can still program the circuit to be a majority function of any of the 3 inputs. With a set of 7 inputs one can consider the state of a selected subset of 5 inputs, and so on. Other variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
  • This advantageous feature could potentially offer a significant saving in the circuit design since costly revision of the silicon design and its associated process cost can be avoided.
  • While this preferred example illustrates a majority function logic gate, those skilled in the art will appreciate from the foregoing that this is just an example and that other complex CMOS logic gates can be implemented using the capacitive coupling devices as well. It is expected that the novel capacitive coupling device can be utilized in a number of applications in a non-memory is capacity as a substitute for a conventional FET.

Claims (10)

What is claimed is:
1. An electronic logic circuit comprising:
a plurality of two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates coupled to process a set of data inputs;
each two terminal areal capacitive coupling gate being a single gate configured such that a voltage potential of a floating gate of such single gate can be altered in response to receiving a single input signal from said set of data inputs, said floating gate being configured to place said two terminal areal capacitive coupling gate into a first state or a second state through areal capacitive coupling to a potential associated with a first active region of such gate receiving said single input signal;
each two terminal areal capacitive coupling gate further being configured by a function select signal to be on or off so as to enable the electronic logic circuit to process and implement a majority function operation with a selected subset of two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates for a selected subset of is said set of data inputs;
an output of each of said selected subset of two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates being related to said first state or said second state, such that a plurality of separate selected outputs can be generated by said selected subset of two terminal areal capacitive gates; and
an output of each two terminal areal capacitive coupling gate of said selected subset of two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates being related to said first state or said second state, and said selected subset of interconnected two terminal areas capacitive gates being configured to generate a plurality of separate outputs from a plurality of separate ones of said set of data inputs;
wherein said plurality of separate outputs of said plurality of interconnected two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates process separate single ones of said set of data inputs and effectuate a collective output corresponding to a logic function implemented for said selected subset set of data inputs.
2. The logic circuit of claim 1, wherein said logic function is a majority gate function implemented on a limited variable number of a maximum number of inputs to said logic circuit.
3. The logic circuit of claim 1, wherein said two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates operate using channel hot electron injection.
4. The logic circuit of claim 1, wherein said function select signal is hardwired by an electrical connection to an interconnect mask.
5. A method of operating a logic circuit using a dual function electronic logic gate which is a single gate that employs areal capacitive coupling between a source/drain region and a floating gate comprising:
a. enabling the single gate to perform a first circuit function within the is logic circuit when a first selection voltage is applied to an input terminal of the device coupled to said source/drain region;
b. enabling the single gate to perform a second circuit function within the logic circuit when a second selection voltage is applied to said input terminal;
wherein the first circuit function is a memory function, and second circuit function is a switching function;
wherein the dual function electronic logic gate only participates in a logic function implemented by the logic circuit when configured to perform said first circuit function; and
further wherein the first input voltage effectuating a memory function for the dual function electronic logic gate is substantially higher than said second input voltage effectuating said switching function.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein said steps are performed for multiple dual function electronic logic gates in the logic circuit.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein only a subset of available dual function electronic logic gates are configured with said first circuit function.
8. The method of claim 5, wherein said first selection voltage is at least 2× said second selection voltage.
9. The method of claim 5, wherein said first selection voltage is sufficiently high to cause hot electron injection onto the floating gate of the dual function electronic logic gate.
10. The method of claim 5, wherein said input terminal is electrically connected by an interconnect mask to only one of said first selection voltage or second selection voltage.
US14/665,429 2010-09-15 2015-03-23 Capacitively coupled logic gate Abandoned US20150194965A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/665,429 US20150194965A1 (en) 2010-09-15 2015-03-23 Capacitively coupled logic gate

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US38312810P 2010-09-15 2010-09-15
US13/233,767 US8988103B2 (en) 2010-09-15 2011-09-15 Capacitively coupled logic gate
US14/665,429 US20150194965A1 (en) 2010-09-15 2015-03-23 Capacitively coupled logic gate

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/233,767 Continuation US8988103B2 (en) 2010-09-15 2011-09-15 Capacitively coupled logic gate

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150194965A1 true US20150194965A1 (en) 2015-07-09

Family

ID=45806069

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/233,767 Active 2031-12-07 US8988103B2 (en) 2010-09-15 2011-09-15 Capacitively coupled logic gate
US14/665,429 Abandoned US20150194965A1 (en) 2010-09-15 2015-03-23 Capacitively coupled logic gate

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/233,767 Active 2031-12-07 US8988103B2 (en) 2010-09-15 2011-09-15 Capacitively coupled logic gate

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US8988103B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8988103B2 (en) * 2010-09-15 2015-03-24 David K. Y. Liu Capacitively coupled logic gate
US10382039B2 (en) * 2017-11-20 2019-08-13 Mark B Johnson Microsensor detection process
US11641205B1 (en) * 2021-10-01 2023-05-02 Kepler Computing Inc. Reset mechanism for a chain of majority or minority gates having paraelectric material

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5937399A (en) * 1993-12-02 1999-08-10 Tadahiro Ohmi Semiconductor integrated circuit
US5946239A (en) * 1997-08-11 1999-08-31 Fujitsu Limited Non-volatile semiconductor memory device
US6510193B1 (en) * 1995-10-30 2003-01-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Charge transfer device and a semiconductor circuit including the device
US20030153149A1 (en) * 2002-02-08 2003-08-14 Zhong Dong Floating gate nitridation
US7782668B2 (en) * 2007-11-01 2010-08-24 Jonker Llc Integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile one-time-programmable and multiple-time programmable memory
US7787295B2 (en) * 2007-11-14 2010-08-31 Jonker Llc Integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile multiple-time programmable memory having variable coupling
US8598642B2 (en) * 2011-02-14 2013-12-03 Synopsys, Inc. Very dense NVM bitcell
US8988103B2 (en) * 2010-09-15 2015-03-24 David K. Y. Liu Capacitively coupled logic gate
US9224739B2 (en) * 2007-11-14 2015-12-29 Invensas Corporation Method of making integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile programmable memory having variable coupling

Family Cites Families (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT1209227B (en) 1980-06-04 1989-07-16 Sgs Microelettronica Spa ELECTRICALLY ALTERABLE FLOATING 'GATE' MEMORY CELL.
JPH07120720B2 (en) 1987-12-17 1995-12-20 三菱電機株式会社 Nonvolatile semiconductor memory device
EP0595775B1 (en) 1992-10-29 1999-07-28 STMicroelectronics S.r.l. Method of evaluating the dielectric layer of nonvolatile EPROM, EEPROM and flash-EEPROM memories
JP3522788B2 (en) 1992-10-29 2004-04-26 株式会社ルネサステクノロジ Semiconductor integrated circuit device
JP3073645B2 (en) 1993-12-27 2000-08-07 株式会社東芝 Nonvolatile semiconductor memory device and method of operating the same
US6456992B1 (en) * 1995-03-24 2002-09-24 Tadashi Shibata Semiconductor arithmetic circuit
US6470328B1 (en) * 1998-08-07 2002-10-22 Monolith Company, Ltd. Artificial neuron on the base of B-driven threshold element
US6631087B2 (en) 2000-06-23 2003-10-07 Gennum Corporation Low voltage single poly deep sub-micron flash eeprom
TW477065B (en) 2001-01-30 2002-02-21 Ememory Technology Inc Manufacturing method of flash memory cell structure with dynamic-like write-in/erasing through channel and its operating method
US6441443B1 (en) 2001-02-13 2002-08-27 Ememory Technology Inc. Embedded type flash memory structure and method for operating the same
JP4170604B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2008-10-22 株式会社東芝 Nonvolatile semiconductor memory
US6489202B1 (en) 2001-05-29 2002-12-03 Ememory Technology, Inc. Structure of an embedded channel write-erase flash memory cell and fabricating method thereof
JP2003197765A (en) 2001-12-28 2003-07-11 Texas Instr Japan Ltd Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing the same
US6528842B1 (en) * 2001-12-31 2003-03-04 Jet City Electronics, Inc. Electronically erasable memory cell using CMOS technology
US6678190B2 (en) 2002-01-25 2004-01-13 Ememory Technology Inc. Single poly embedded eprom
US7064978B2 (en) 2002-07-05 2006-06-20 Aplus Flash Technology, Inc. Monolithic, combo nonvolatile memory allowing byte, page and block write with no disturb and divided-well in the cell array using a unified cell structure and technology with a new scheme of decoder and layout
AU2003255254A1 (en) 2002-08-08 2004-02-25 Glenn J. Leedy Vertical system integration
US6920067B2 (en) 2002-12-25 2005-07-19 Ememory Technology Inc. Integrated circuit embedded with single-poly non-volatile memory
JP4314085B2 (en) * 2003-09-08 2009-08-12 パナソニック株式会社 Nonvolatile semiconductor memory device
US7019557B2 (en) * 2003-12-24 2006-03-28 Viciciv Technology Look-up table based logic macro-cells
US7046549B2 (en) 2003-12-31 2006-05-16 Solid State System Co., Ltd. Nonvolatile memory structure
US7064973B2 (en) * 2004-02-03 2006-06-20 Klp International, Ltd. Combination field programmable gate array allowing dynamic reprogrammability
US7898297B2 (en) * 2005-01-04 2011-03-01 Semi Solution, Llc Method and apparatus for dynamic threshold voltage control of MOS transistors in dynamic logic circuits
JP4645238B2 (en) * 2005-03-09 2011-03-09 日本電気株式会社 Semiconductor device
US7411425B2 (en) * 2005-06-28 2008-08-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method for power consumption reduction in a limited-switch dynamic logic (LSDL) circuit
US7365387B2 (en) 2006-02-23 2008-04-29 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Gate-coupled EPROM cell for printhead
TWI325165B (en) 2006-04-20 2010-05-21 Ememory Technology Inc Method for operating a single-poly single-transistor non-volatile memory cell
US7939861B2 (en) 2007-02-02 2011-05-10 Synopsys, Inc. Non-volatile memory devices having floating-gates FETs with different source-gate and drain-gate border lengths
US8067795B2 (en) 2007-03-12 2011-11-29 Texas Instruments Incorporated Single poly EEPROM without separate control gate nor erase regions
US8269287B2 (en) * 2007-05-25 2012-09-18 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation Floating gate memory device with increased coupling coefficient
US7800156B2 (en) * 2008-02-25 2010-09-21 Tower Semiconductor Ltd. Asymmetric single poly NMOS non-volatile memory cell
KR101539667B1 (en) * 2008-06-18 2015-07-28 삼성전자주식회사 Inverter device and method of operating the same

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5937399A (en) * 1993-12-02 1999-08-10 Tadahiro Ohmi Semiconductor integrated circuit
US6510193B1 (en) * 1995-10-30 2003-01-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Charge transfer device and a semiconductor circuit including the device
US5946239A (en) * 1997-08-11 1999-08-31 Fujitsu Limited Non-volatile semiconductor memory device
US20030153149A1 (en) * 2002-02-08 2003-08-14 Zhong Dong Floating gate nitridation
US7782668B2 (en) * 2007-11-01 2010-08-24 Jonker Llc Integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile one-time-programmable and multiple-time programmable memory
US7787295B2 (en) * 2007-11-14 2010-08-31 Jonker Llc Integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile multiple-time programmable memory having variable coupling
US9224739B2 (en) * 2007-11-14 2015-12-29 Invensas Corporation Method of making integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile programmable memory having variable coupling
US8988103B2 (en) * 2010-09-15 2015-03-24 David K. Y. Liu Capacitively coupled logic gate
US8598642B2 (en) * 2011-02-14 2013-12-03 Synopsys, Inc. Very dense NVM bitcell

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20120062276A1 (en) 2012-03-15
US8988103B2 (en) 2015-03-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7332934B2 (en) Programmable interconnect structures
US6392437B2 (en) Programmable multi-standard I/O architecture for FPGAs
JPH07226098A (en) Programmable buffer
US20110074464A1 (en) Low power programmable logic devices
US6803789B1 (en) High voltage tolerant output buffer
US6909306B2 (en) Programmable multi-standard I/O architecture for FPGAS
US20150194965A1 (en) Capacitively coupled logic gate
US8089821B2 (en) Memory device using antifuses
JPH04317223A (en) Logic module
US7233178B2 (en) Power-on solution to avoid crowbar current for multiple power supplies&#39; inputs/outputs
US6870407B2 (en) Thin gate oxide output drive
US7764108B2 (en) Electrical fuse circuit
WO1996001474A1 (en) Technique to prevent deprogramming a floating gate transistor
US6476638B1 (en) Input driver circuit with adjustable trip point for multiple input voltage standards
JP4411360B2 (en) Method and apparatus for different gate oxide thicknesses
US6222397B1 (en) Output circuit with switching function
US6028444A (en) Three-statable net driver for antifuse field programmable gate array
US7521987B1 (en) Multiple supply voltage select circuit for reduced supply voltage levels
US9755647B1 (en) Techniques for handling high voltage circuitry in an integrated circuit
US6845044B2 (en) Method of preventing high Icc at start-up in zero-power EEPROM cells for PLD applications
US20020180495A1 (en) CMOS output circuit
KR100358254B1 (en) Circuit for switching high voltages on a semiconductor chip, and method of operating the circuit
JP4012095B2 (en) Semiconductor device input / output circuit
JP4680423B2 (en) Output circuit
EP0181097A2 (en) Programmable enable buffer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: JONKER LLC, NEVADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LIU, DAVID K.Y.;REEL/FRAME:037295/0129

Effective date: 20151211

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION