US20150194965A1 - Capacitively coupled logic gate - Google Patents
Capacitively coupled logic gate Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20150194965A1 US20150194965A1 US14/665,429 US201514665429A US2015194965A1 US 20150194965 A1 US20150194965 A1 US 20150194965A1 US 201514665429 A US201514665429 A US 201514665429A US 2015194965 A1 US2015194965 A1 US 2015194965A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- function
- gate
- capacitive coupling
- terminal
- logic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 51
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000002784 hot electron Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000006386 memory function Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007943 implant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004513 sizing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03K—PULSE TECHNIQUE
- H03K19/00—Logic circuits, i.e. having at least two inputs acting on one output; Inverting circuits
- H03K19/20—Logic circuits, i.e. having at least two inputs acting on one output; Inverting circuits characterised by logic function, e.g. AND, OR, NOR, NOT circuits
- H03K19/23—Majority or minority circuits, i.e. giving output having the state of the majority or the minority of the inputs
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03K—PULSE TECHNIQUE
- H03K19/00—Logic circuits, i.e. having at least two inputs acting on one output; Inverting circuits
- H03K19/02—Logic circuits, i.e. having at least two inputs acting on one output; Inverting circuits using specified components
- H03K19/173—Logic circuits, i.e. having at least two inputs acting on one output; Inverting circuits using specified components using elementary logic circuits as components
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H10—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10B—ELECTRONIC MEMORY DEVICES
- H10B41/00—Electrically erasable-and-programmable ROM [EEPROM] devices comprising floating gates
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H10—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10D—INORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
- H10D84/00—Integrated devices formed in or on semiconductor substrates that comprise only semiconducting layers, e.g. on Si wafers or on GaAs-on-Si wafers
- H10D84/90—Masterslice integrated circuits
- H10D84/903—Masterslice integrated circuits comprising field effect technology
Definitions
- the present disclosure pertains to semiconductor logic gates, particularly those which can be implemented using capacitive coupling.
- the '668 patent discloses a new type of single-poly non-volatile memory device structure that can be operated either as an OTP (one time programmable) or as an MTP (multiple time programmable) memory cell.
- the device is programmed using hot electron injection. It also has a structure that is fully compatible with advanced CMOS logic process, and would require, at the worst case, very minimal additional steps to implement. Other unique aspects of the device are described in the '668 patent as well.
- An object of the present invention is to extend the use of capacitive coupling to specific types of logic devices and circuits.
- a plurality of areal capacitive coupling devices are coupled to process a set of data inputs; each is preferably configured such that a floating gate potential of such device can be altered in response to receiving an input signal from the set of data inputs; the floating gate potential can be adjusted to place the areal capacitive coupling device into a first state or a second state through areal capacitive coupling to a potential associated with a first active region receiving the input signal; the areal capacitive coupling devices as interconnected generate a first logic output which is a first logical function associated with the set of data inputs.
- Other objects of the invention include methods of operating a dual function gate in which the device performs a different circuit function depending on a level is of an input signal applied to such logic gate;
- a further object is to provide an electronic circuit in which logic gates can also be imbued with a memory function to allow for dual functionality.
- FIG. 1 depicts a preferred embodiment of a circuit implementing a 3-input majority function.
- FIG. 2 depicts the Load Line characteristics of the 3-Input Capacitive Coupling Device and Pull Down transistor shown in FIG. 1 .
- the '668 gate/drain overlap device using areal capacitive coupling can be used in non-memory applications as well.
- the device's unique characteristics can be used to efficiently implement a number of CMOS logic functions, including, preferably, one of the most device consuming and yet useful—the Majority Function.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a preferred implementation of a 3-input majority function logic gate 100 implemented with three (3) '668 capacitive coupling devices (shown at the top of the figure as 10 A, 10 B and 10 C) along with standard CMOS transistors (including a pair of inverters on the right — 20 A/ 20 B, and a conventional N MOS pulldown FET 30 ) at the bottom).
- CMOS transistors including a pair of inverters on the right — 20 A/ 20 B, and a conventional N MOS pulldown FET 30 .
- FIG. 2 The output voltage characteristics, with the capacitive coupling devices as load lines, of the above 3 input circuit is illustrated in FIG. 2 .
- the intersecting point will yield an output voltage that is higher than the VIH of the inverter circuit ( 20 A/ 20 B), and will allow the output of the voltage after the two inverter stage to be high, fulfilling a majority function.
- the transistor count saving, and the subsequent silicon area saving become geometrically larger when the number of inputs for the majority function increases. For example, for a 5-input majority function, only 5 capacitive coupling devices, 1 matched pull-down transistor, and 2 pair of NMOS and PMOS transistors for 2-stage inverter circuit are required. In general, for any N input majority function gate, the device count will be N capacitive coupling devices and an additional set of 5 support transistors.
- the capacitive coupling device implementation of a logic gate is advantageous is that a conventional N-channel floating gate device would not be able to turn on if the drain coupling is not high enough to overcome the Vt of the NMOS device.
- the present device has a high coupling ratio to allow sufficient voltage coupled to the floating gate to turn on the device in accordance with a target/nominal Vt implant process used in the IC manufacturing flow.
- the majority function can be implemented in an alternative embodiment in which the invention is taken to an extreme and 100% coupling is used, i.e., such as to effectuate a form of NMOS gated diode (e.g., NMOS with gate connected to the drain directly).
- NMOS gated diode e.g., NMOS with gate connected to the drain directly.
- the disadvantage of this approach is that it removes one degree of process freedom, in that the only remaining mechanism to control the switching/output of the device is through adjusting the nominal Vt for the device, a tradeoff that may result in compatability problems with the CMOS parameters of other devices in the integrated circuit, as well as complicate the matching of the logic circuit output to the pulldown FET characteristics.
- a capacitive coupling device implementation with less than 100% coupling offers an advantage over a pure NMOS gated diode implementation, since the output current of the capacitive coupling device can be tailored specifically through the coupling capacitance, without altering the baseline CMOS process parameters (such as Vt) used by other logic circuits, and allowing the logic function to be implemented optimally to other related circuit elements, such as the pulldown FET.
- the present invention affords a more flexible technique to implement a logic function since a nominal logic gate Vt and related process parameters can be used as a driver to determine sizings of the gates/active regions, and the extent of the coupling ratio ( ⁇ ) that should be used for any particular circuit.
- variants of the invention can include hardwired logic (i.e., a PLD, programmable logic) and conventional CMOS logic functions, albeit more efficient in device counts.
- hardwired logic i.e., a PLD, programmable logic
- CMOS logic functions albeit more efficient in device counts.
- Another advantage of using the preferred embodiment of this invention is that the situation where an input to the majority function may no longer be valid can be addressed with the use of capacitive coupled devices as described in '668. If an input is no longer needed, the associated capacitive coupled device is can be programmed to be off and be removed from being considered in the output of the logic function. That is, any one or more of the logic devices in the circuit can be configured effectively by a function select signal.
- the function select signal can apply a potential to the logic device so that it instead behaves as a quasi-memory device. That is, the device behaves effectively like a memory gate, not a logic gate, when the floating gate is raised to a sufficiently high potential.
- the output or function can be hardwired or burned in during manufacturing. This can be accomplished by predetermined programming respective inputs to the logic gates, to configure them into an erased or programmed state as desired.
- circuits of the capacitive coupled dual function devices can be employed of course, and the invention is not limited in this respect.
- Many types of conventional circuits are expected to benefit from devices which can adjust their behavior dynamically in response to a function select signal.
- a majority function circuit can be altered to render a majority function for any subset of the inputs. For example, even with maximum of 5 inputs, one can still program the circuit to be a majority function of any of the 3 inputs. With a set of 7 inputs one can consider the state of a selected subset of 5 inputs, and so on. Other variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
- This advantageous feature could potentially offer a significant saving in the circuit design since costly revision of the silicon design and its associated process cost can be avoided.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Logic Circuits (AREA)
Abstract
An electronic logic circuit uses areal capacitive coupling devices coupled together to process a set of data inputs. Each areal capacitive coupling device can be configured such that a floating gate potential of such device can be altered to at least a first state or a second state in response to receiving an input signal from the set of data inputs, which is coupled electrically to the floating gate. A majority function logic circuit (and other similar circuits) can be interconnected this way using far fewer gates than with a conventional CMOS implementation. Selective logic gates can also be enabled or disabled by configuring them effectively as memory devices.
Description
- The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/233,767, filed Sep. 15, 2011, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of the priority date of Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/383,128 filed Sep. 15, 2010. Both of those applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
- The present disclosure pertains to semiconductor logic gates, particularly those which can be implemented using capacitive coupling.
- Reference is made to U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,782,668 and 7,787,295 and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/264,029, 12/264,060, 12/264,076, 12/271,647, 12,271,666 and 12/271,680 all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- The '668 patent discloses a new type of single-poly non-volatile memory device structure that can be operated either as an OTP (one time programmable) or as an MTP (multiple time programmable) memory cell. The device is programmed using hot electron injection. It also has a structure that is fully compatible with advanced CMOS logic process, and would require, at the worst case, very minimal additional steps to implement. Other unique aspects of the device are described in the '668 patent as well.
- An object of the present invention is to extend the use of capacitive coupling to specific types of logic devices and circuits.
- In accordance with this object a plurality of areal capacitive coupling devices are coupled to process a set of data inputs; each is preferably configured such that a floating gate potential of such device can be altered in response to receiving an input signal from the set of data inputs; the floating gate potential can be adjusted to place the areal capacitive coupling device into a first state or a second state through areal capacitive coupling to a potential associated with a first active region receiving the input signal; the areal capacitive coupling devices as interconnected generate a first logic output which is a first logical function associated with the set of data inputs.
- Other objects of the invention include methods of operating a dual function gate in which the device performs a different circuit function depending on a level is of an input signal applied to such logic gate;
- Another object is to provide a logic gate with N inputs and in which a selected set M of inputs (M<=N−2) can be considered for purposes of determining a logical majority function.
- A further object is to provide an electronic circuit in which logic gates can also be imbued with a memory function to allow for dual functionality.
-
FIG. 1 depicts a preferred embodiment of a circuit implementing a 3-input majority function. -
FIG. 2 depicts the Load Line characteristics of the 3-Input Capacitive Coupling Device and Pull Down transistor shown inFIG. 1 . - Applicant has discovered that the '668 gate/drain overlap device using areal capacitive coupling (hereinafter referred to as the “capacitive coupling device”) can be used in non-memory applications as well. As discussed herein, the device's unique characteristics can be used to efficiently implement a number of CMOS logic functions, including, preferably, one of the most device consuming and yet useful—the Majority Function.
-
FIG. 1 below illustrates a preferred implementation of a 3-input majority function logic gate 100 implemented with three (3) '668 capacitive coupling devices (shown at the top of the figure as 10A, 10B and 10C) along with standard CMOS transistors (including a pair of inverters on the right —20A/20B, and a conventional N MOS pulldown FET 30) at the bottom). It will be understood by those skilled in the art that other combinations and connections of devices could is be used to effectuate the same result of the exemplary gate shown inFIG. 1 , including of course for larger numbers of inputs. - The output voltage characteristics, with the capacitive coupling devices as load lines, of the above 3 input circuit is illustrated in
FIG. 2 . As can be seen from the figure, if 2 or more (a majority) of the inputs todevices 10A/10B/10C are conducting, the intersecting point will yield an output voltage that is higher than the VIH of the inverter circuit (20A/20B), and will allow the output of the voltage after the two inverter stage to be high, fulfilling a majority function. - Conversely, if only one or none of the inputs (not majority) is conducting, the output voltage is below VIL, and will not be able to trigger the inverter. This is how a 3-input majority function is preferably implemented; namely with 3 capacitive coupling devices, 1 pull-down transistor, and 2 pair of NMOS and PMOS transistors for 2 inverter circuits. All of these devices are conventional, and to ensure adequate margin of operation it is preferable to perform simulations to select and match the size of the various transistors. This can be accomplished using any number of well-known design tools, and is commonly done in providing logic cell libraries, so it is well within the skill of the ordinary artisan without undue experimentation.
- The transistor count saving, and the subsequent silicon area saving, become geometrically larger when the number of inputs for the majority function increases. For example, for a 5-input majority function, only 5 capacitive coupling devices, 1 matched pull-down transistor, and 2 pair of NMOS and PMOS transistors for 2-stage inverter circuit are required. In general, for any N input majority function gate, the device count will be N capacitive coupling devices and an additional set of 5 support transistors.
- One reason that using the capacitive coupling device implementation of a logic gate is advantageous is that a conventional N-channel floating gate device would not be able to turn on if the drain coupling is not high enough to overcome the Vt of the NMOS device. The present device has a high coupling ratio to allow sufficient voltage coupled to the floating gate to turn on the device in accordance with a target/nominal Vt implant process used in the IC manufacturing flow.
- Persons skilled in the art will appreciate from the present teachings that the majority function can be implemented in an alternative embodiment in which the invention is taken to an extreme and 100% coupling is used, i.e., such as to effectuate a form of NMOS gated diode (e.g., NMOS with gate connected to the drain directly). The disadvantage of this approach is that it removes one degree of process freedom, in that the only remaining mechanism to control the switching/output of the device is through adjusting the nominal Vt for the device, a tradeoff that may result in compatability problems with the CMOS parameters of other devices in the integrated circuit, as well as complicate the matching of the logic circuit output to the pulldown FET characteristics.
- A capacitive coupling device implementation with less than 100% coupling offers an advantage over a pure NMOS gated diode implementation, since the output current of the capacitive coupling device can be tailored specifically through the coupling capacitance, without altering the baseline CMOS process parameters (such as Vt) used by other logic circuits, and allowing the logic function to be implemented optimally to other related circuit elements, such as the pulldown FET. Thus the present invention affords a more flexible technique to implement a logic function since a nominal logic gate Vt and related process parameters can be used as a driver to determine sizings of the gates/active regions, and the extent of the coupling ratio (∀) that should be used for any particular circuit.
- Other variants of the invention can include hardwired logic (i.e., a PLD, programmable logic) and conventional CMOS logic functions, albeit more efficient in device counts. By allowing embedding of the device within a CMOS process, one can implement a “hardwired” look-up table to implement some logic function, much like an FPGA.
- Another advantage of using the preferred embodiment of this invention is that the situation where an input to the majority function may no longer be valid can be addressed with the use of capacitive coupled devices as described in '668. If an input is no longer needed, the associated capacitive coupled device is can be programmed to be off and be removed from being considered in the output of the logic function. That is, any one or more of the logic devices in the circuit can be configured effectively by a function select signal. The function select signal can apply a potential to the logic device so that it instead behaves as a quasi-memory device. That is, the device behaves effectively like a memory gate, not a logic gate, when the floating gate is raised to a sufficiently high potential. This has the effect of turning the device off (i.e., rendering it non-conductive) and thus selectively enabling or disabling its participation in a circuit logic function. In some embodiments the output or function can be hardwired or burned in during manufacturing. This can be accomplished by predetermined programming respective inputs to the logic gates, to configure them into an erased or programmed state as desired.
- Other variations of circuits of the capacitive coupled dual function devices can be employed of course, and the invention is not limited in this respect. Many types of conventional circuits are expected to benefit from devices which can adjust their behavior dynamically in response to a function select signal.
- Thus certain embodiments of the present invention can be implemented so that a majority function circuit can be altered to render a majority function for any subset of the inputs. For example, even with maximum of 5 inputs, one can still program the circuit to be a majority function of any of the 3 inputs. With a set of 7 inputs one can consider the state of a selected subset of 5 inputs, and so on. Other variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
- This advantageous feature could potentially offer a significant saving in the circuit design since costly revision of the silicon design and its associated process cost can be avoided.
- While this preferred example illustrates a majority function logic gate, those skilled in the art will appreciate from the foregoing that this is just an example and that other complex CMOS logic gates can be implemented using the capacitive coupling devices as well. It is expected that the novel capacitive coupling device can be utilized in a number of applications in a non-memory is capacity as a substitute for a conventional FET.
Claims (10)
1. An electronic logic circuit comprising:
a plurality of two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates coupled to process a set of data inputs;
each two terminal areal capacitive coupling gate being a single gate configured such that a voltage potential of a floating gate of such single gate can be altered in response to receiving a single input signal from said set of data inputs, said floating gate being configured to place said two terminal areal capacitive coupling gate into a first state or a second state through areal capacitive coupling to a potential associated with a first active region of such gate receiving said single input signal;
each two terminal areal capacitive coupling gate further being configured by a function select signal to be on or off so as to enable the electronic logic circuit to process and implement a majority function operation with a selected subset of two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates for a selected subset of is said set of data inputs;
an output of each of said selected subset of two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates being related to said first state or said second state, such that a plurality of separate selected outputs can be generated by said selected subset of two terminal areal capacitive gates; and
an output of each two terminal areal capacitive coupling gate of said selected subset of two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates being related to said first state or said second state, and said selected subset of interconnected two terminal areas capacitive gates being configured to generate a plurality of separate outputs from a plurality of separate ones of said set of data inputs;
wherein said plurality of separate outputs of said plurality of interconnected two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates process separate single ones of said set of data inputs and effectuate a collective output corresponding to a logic function implemented for said selected subset set of data inputs.
2. The logic circuit of claim 1 , wherein said logic function is a majority gate function implemented on a limited variable number of a maximum number of inputs to said logic circuit.
3. The logic circuit of claim 1 , wherein said two terminal areal capacitive coupling gates operate using channel hot electron injection.
4. The logic circuit of claim 1 , wherein said function select signal is hardwired by an electrical connection to an interconnect mask.
5. A method of operating a logic circuit using a dual function electronic logic gate which is a single gate that employs areal capacitive coupling between a source/drain region and a floating gate comprising:
a. enabling the single gate to perform a first circuit function within the is logic circuit when a first selection voltage is applied to an input terminal of the device coupled to said source/drain region;
b. enabling the single gate to perform a second circuit function within the logic circuit when a second selection voltage is applied to said input terminal;
wherein the first circuit function is a memory function, and second circuit function is a switching function;
wherein the dual function electronic logic gate only participates in a logic function implemented by the logic circuit when configured to perform said first circuit function; and
further wherein the first input voltage effectuating a memory function for the dual function electronic logic gate is substantially higher than said second input voltage effectuating said switching function.
6. The method of claim 5 , wherein said steps are performed for multiple dual function electronic logic gates in the logic circuit.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein only a subset of available dual function electronic logic gates are configured with said first circuit function.
8. The method of claim 5 , wherein said first selection voltage is at least 2× said second selection voltage.
9. The method of claim 5 , wherein said first selection voltage is sufficiently high to cause hot electron injection onto the floating gate of the dual function electronic logic gate.
10. The method of claim 5 , wherein said input terminal is electrically connected by an interconnect mask to only one of said first selection voltage or second selection voltage.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/665,429 US20150194965A1 (en) | 2010-09-15 | 2015-03-23 | Capacitively coupled logic gate |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US38312810P | 2010-09-15 | 2010-09-15 | |
US13/233,767 US8988103B2 (en) | 2010-09-15 | 2011-09-15 | Capacitively coupled logic gate |
US14/665,429 US20150194965A1 (en) | 2010-09-15 | 2015-03-23 | Capacitively coupled logic gate |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/233,767 Continuation US8988103B2 (en) | 2010-09-15 | 2011-09-15 | Capacitively coupled logic gate |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150194965A1 true US20150194965A1 (en) | 2015-07-09 |
Family
ID=45806069
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/233,767 Active 2031-12-07 US8988103B2 (en) | 2010-09-15 | 2011-09-15 | Capacitively coupled logic gate |
US14/665,429 Abandoned US20150194965A1 (en) | 2010-09-15 | 2015-03-23 | Capacitively coupled logic gate |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/233,767 Active 2031-12-07 US8988103B2 (en) | 2010-09-15 | 2011-09-15 | Capacitively coupled logic gate |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8988103B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8988103B2 (en) * | 2010-09-15 | 2015-03-24 | David K. Y. Liu | Capacitively coupled logic gate |
US10382039B2 (en) * | 2017-11-20 | 2019-08-13 | Mark B Johnson | Microsensor detection process |
US11641205B1 (en) * | 2021-10-01 | 2023-05-02 | Kepler Computing Inc. | Reset mechanism for a chain of majority or minority gates having paraelectric material |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5937399A (en) * | 1993-12-02 | 1999-08-10 | Tadahiro Ohmi | Semiconductor integrated circuit |
US5946239A (en) * | 1997-08-11 | 1999-08-31 | Fujitsu Limited | Non-volatile semiconductor memory device |
US6510193B1 (en) * | 1995-10-30 | 2003-01-21 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Charge transfer device and a semiconductor circuit including the device |
US20030153149A1 (en) * | 2002-02-08 | 2003-08-14 | Zhong Dong | Floating gate nitridation |
US7782668B2 (en) * | 2007-11-01 | 2010-08-24 | Jonker Llc | Integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile one-time-programmable and multiple-time programmable memory |
US7787295B2 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2010-08-31 | Jonker Llc | Integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile multiple-time programmable memory having variable coupling |
US8598642B2 (en) * | 2011-02-14 | 2013-12-03 | Synopsys, Inc. | Very dense NVM bitcell |
US8988103B2 (en) * | 2010-09-15 | 2015-03-24 | David K. Y. Liu | Capacitively coupled logic gate |
US9224739B2 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2015-12-29 | Invensas Corporation | Method of making integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile programmable memory having variable coupling |
Family Cites Families (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IT1209227B (en) | 1980-06-04 | 1989-07-16 | Sgs Microelettronica Spa | ELECTRICALLY ALTERABLE FLOATING 'GATE' MEMORY CELL. |
JPH07120720B2 (en) | 1987-12-17 | 1995-12-20 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Nonvolatile semiconductor memory device |
EP0595775B1 (en) | 1992-10-29 | 1999-07-28 | STMicroelectronics S.r.l. | Method of evaluating the dielectric layer of nonvolatile EPROM, EEPROM and flash-EEPROM memories |
JP3522788B2 (en) | 1992-10-29 | 2004-04-26 | 株式会社ルネサステクノロジ | Semiconductor integrated circuit device |
JP3073645B2 (en) | 1993-12-27 | 2000-08-07 | 株式会社東芝 | Nonvolatile semiconductor memory device and method of operating the same |
US6456992B1 (en) * | 1995-03-24 | 2002-09-24 | Tadashi Shibata | Semiconductor arithmetic circuit |
US6470328B1 (en) * | 1998-08-07 | 2002-10-22 | Monolith Company, Ltd. | Artificial neuron on the base of B-driven threshold element |
US6631087B2 (en) | 2000-06-23 | 2003-10-07 | Gennum Corporation | Low voltage single poly deep sub-micron flash eeprom |
TW477065B (en) | 2001-01-30 | 2002-02-21 | Ememory Technology Inc | Manufacturing method of flash memory cell structure with dynamic-like write-in/erasing through channel and its operating method |
US6441443B1 (en) | 2001-02-13 | 2002-08-27 | Ememory Technology Inc. | Embedded type flash memory structure and method for operating the same |
JP4170604B2 (en) | 2001-04-18 | 2008-10-22 | 株式会社東芝 | Nonvolatile semiconductor memory |
US6489202B1 (en) | 2001-05-29 | 2002-12-03 | Ememory Technology, Inc. | Structure of an embedded channel write-erase flash memory cell and fabricating method thereof |
JP2003197765A (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2003-07-11 | Texas Instr Japan Ltd | Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing the same |
US6528842B1 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2003-03-04 | Jet City Electronics, Inc. | Electronically erasable memory cell using CMOS technology |
US6678190B2 (en) | 2002-01-25 | 2004-01-13 | Ememory Technology Inc. | Single poly embedded eprom |
US7064978B2 (en) | 2002-07-05 | 2006-06-20 | Aplus Flash Technology, Inc. | Monolithic, combo nonvolatile memory allowing byte, page and block write with no disturb and divided-well in the cell array using a unified cell structure and technology with a new scheme of decoder and layout |
AU2003255254A1 (en) | 2002-08-08 | 2004-02-25 | Glenn J. Leedy | Vertical system integration |
US6920067B2 (en) | 2002-12-25 | 2005-07-19 | Ememory Technology Inc. | Integrated circuit embedded with single-poly non-volatile memory |
JP4314085B2 (en) * | 2003-09-08 | 2009-08-12 | パナソニック株式会社 | Nonvolatile semiconductor memory device |
US7019557B2 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2006-03-28 | Viciciv Technology | Look-up table based logic macro-cells |
US7046549B2 (en) | 2003-12-31 | 2006-05-16 | Solid State System Co., Ltd. | Nonvolatile memory structure |
US7064973B2 (en) * | 2004-02-03 | 2006-06-20 | Klp International, Ltd. | Combination field programmable gate array allowing dynamic reprogrammability |
US7898297B2 (en) * | 2005-01-04 | 2011-03-01 | Semi Solution, Llc | Method and apparatus for dynamic threshold voltage control of MOS transistors in dynamic logic circuits |
JP4645238B2 (en) * | 2005-03-09 | 2011-03-09 | 日本電気株式会社 | Semiconductor device |
US7411425B2 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2008-08-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for power consumption reduction in a limited-switch dynamic logic (LSDL) circuit |
US7365387B2 (en) | 2006-02-23 | 2008-04-29 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Gate-coupled EPROM cell for printhead |
TWI325165B (en) | 2006-04-20 | 2010-05-21 | Ememory Technology Inc | Method for operating a single-poly single-transistor non-volatile memory cell |
US7939861B2 (en) | 2007-02-02 | 2011-05-10 | Synopsys, Inc. | Non-volatile memory devices having floating-gates FETs with different source-gate and drain-gate border lengths |
US8067795B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2011-11-29 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Single poly EEPROM without separate control gate nor erase regions |
US8269287B2 (en) * | 2007-05-25 | 2012-09-18 | Cypress Semiconductor Corporation | Floating gate memory device with increased coupling coefficient |
US7800156B2 (en) * | 2008-02-25 | 2010-09-21 | Tower Semiconductor Ltd. | Asymmetric single poly NMOS non-volatile memory cell |
KR101539667B1 (en) * | 2008-06-18 | 2015-07-28 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Inverter device and method of operating the same |
-
2011
- 2011-09-15 US US13/233,767 patent/US8988103B2/en active Active
-
2015
- 2015-03-23 US US14/665,429 patent/US20150194965A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5937399A (en) * | 1993-12-02 | 1999-08-10 | Tadahiro Ohmi | Semiconductor integrated circuit |
US6510193B1 (en) * | 1995-10-30 | 2003-01-21 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Charge transfer device and a semiconductor circuit including the device |
US5946239A (en) * | 1997-08-11 | 1999-08-31 | Fujitsu Limited | Non-volatile semiconductor memory device |
US20030153149A1 (en) * | 2002-02-08 | 2003-08-14 | Zhong Dong | Floating gate nitridation |
US7782668B2 (en) * | 2007-11-01 | 2010-08-24 | Jonker Llc | Integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile one-time-programmable and multiple-time programmable memory |
US7787295B2 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2010-08-31 | Jonker Llc | Integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile multiple-time programmable memory having variable coupling |
US9224739B2 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2015-12-29 | Invensas Corporation | Method of making integrated circuit embedded with non-volatile programmable memory having variable coupling |
US8988103B2 (en) * | 2010-09-15 | 2015-03-24 | David K. Y. Liu | Capacitively coupled logic gate |
US8598642B2 (en) * | 2011-02-14 | 2013-12-03 | Synopsys, Inc. | Very dense NVM bitcell |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20120062276A1 (en) | 2012-03-15 |
US8988103B2 (en) | 2015-03-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7332934B2 (en) | Programmable interconnect structures | |
US6392437B2 (en) | Programmable multi-standard I/O architecture for FPGAs | |
JPH07226098A (en) | Programmable buffer | |
US20110074464A1 (en) | Low power programmable logic devices | |
US6803789B1 (en) | High voltage tolerant output buffer | |
US6909306B2 (en) | Programmable multi-standard I/O architecture for FPGAS | |
US20150194965A1 (en) | Capacitively coupled logic gate | |
US8089821B2 (en) | Memory device using antifuses | |
JPH04317223A (en) | Logic module | |
US7233178B2 (en) | Power-on solution to avoid crowbar current for multiple power supplies' inputs/outputs | |
US6870407B2 (en) | Thin gate oxide output drive | |
US7764108B2 (en) | Electrical fuse circuit | |
WO1996001474A1 (en) | Technique to prevent deprogramming a floating gate transistor | |
US6476638B1 (en) | Input driver circuit with adjustable trip point for multiple input voltage standards | |
JP4411360B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for different gate oxide thicknesses | |
US6222397B1 (en) | Output circuit with switching function | |
US6028444A (en) | Three-statable net driver for antifuse field programmable gate array | |
US7521987B1 (en) | Multiple supply voltage select circuit for reduced supply voltage levels | |
US9755647B1 (en) | Techniques for handling high voltage circuitry in an integrated circuit | |
US6845044B2 (en) | Method of preventing high Icc at start-up in zero-power EEPROM cells for PLD applications | |
US20020180495A1 (en) | CMOS output circuit | |
KR100358254B1 (en) | Circuit for switching high voltages on a semiconductor chip, and method of operating the circuit | |
JP4012095B2 (en) | Semiconductor device input / output circuit | |
JP4680423B2 (en) | Output circuit | |
EP0181097A2 (en) | Programmable enable buffer |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JONKER LLC, NEVADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LIU, DAVID K.Y.;REEL/FRAME:037295/0129 Effective date: 20151211 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |