[go: up one dir, main page]

US20140298714A1 - Fuel Borne Catalysts for Sulfur Rich Fuels - Google Patents

Fuel Borne Catalysts for Sulfur Rich Fuels Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140298714A1
US20140298714A1 US13/856,873 US201313856873A US2014298714A1 US 20140298714 A1 US20140298714 A1 US 20140298714A1 US 201313856873 A US201313856873 A US 201313856873A US 2014298714 A1 US2014298714 A1 US 2014298714A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
fuel
ppm
mixtures
borne catalyst
group
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/856,873
Inventor
Barry Sprague
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Clean Diesel Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
Clean Diesel Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Clean Diesel Technologies Inc filed Critical Clean Diesel Technologies Inc
Priority to US13/856,873 priority Critical patent/US20140298714A1/en
Assigned to CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGY INC (CDTI) reassignment CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGY INC (CDTI) ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SPRAGUE, BARRY
Priority to PCT/US2014/033033 priority patent/WO2014165797A1/en
Publication of US20140298714A1 publication Critical patent/US20140298714A1/en
Assigned to CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. reassignment CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (CDTI)
Assigned to CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (CDTI) reassignment CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (CDTI) NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SPRAGUE, BARRY
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10LFUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
    • C10L1/00Liquid carbonaceous fuels
    • C10L1/10Liquid carbonaceous fuels containing additives
    • C10L1/12Inorganic compounds
    • C10L1/1216Inorganic compounds metal compounds, e.g. hydrides, carbides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10LFUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
    • C10L10/00Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes
    • C10L10/02Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes for reducing smoke development
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10LFUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
    • C10L2270/00Specifically adapted fuels
    • C10L2270/02Specifically adapted fuels for internal combustion engines
    • C10L2270/026Specifically adapted fuels for internal combustion engines for diesel engines, e.g. automobiles, stationary, marine

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to fuel additives, and more particularly to fuel borne catalysts of use in high sulfur fuels.
  • Diesel engines are highly regarded for their efficiency and reliability. However, they may produce a level of pollution higher than that desired, and may need to have after-treatment strategies, including one or more of either a catalyzed Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) or Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC)—to control Particulate Matter (PM), Hydrocarbon (HC), and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions.
  • DPF Diesel Particulate Filter
  • DOC Diesel Oxidation Catalyst
  • PM Diesel Oxidation Catalyst
  • HC Hydrocarbon
  • CO Carbon Monoxide
  • High sulfur concentrations in the fuel may make some after-treatment devices ineffective due to fouling by sulfate and vigorous chemical attack by sulfur oxides on the DPF/DOC and the catalysts, as most active PGM catalysts for these oxidation reactions typically also catalytically oxidize SO2 to SO3, which in conjunction with water vapor forms sulfuric acid.
  • SO2 may also compete with oxidizable species for active sites on catalysts, and hence may affect NO, CO, HC, and Carbon oxidation. This in turn may result in an increase of the temperature required for Diesel Particulate Filter regeneration and an increase in Balance Point Temperature.
  • Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel As a result, a number of countries have mandated the use of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (USLD). However, fuels containing sulfur levels of up to 3000 ppm are still in use in various parts of the world—in some cases in spite of regulations to the contrary. These levels of sulfur may cause one or more of the aforementioned problems for after-treatment devices of use in the reduction of Particulate Matter (PM) emissions, including particulate filters and diesel oxidation catalysts. Reasons for these problems may include the ability of catalysts to oxidize both NO to NO2, a desired reaction, and SO2 to SO3, an undesired reaction.
  • PM Particulate Matter
  • the present disclosure relates to Fuel Borne Catalyst (FBC) formulations of use with High Sulfur fuels, which may include platinum, palladium, iron, manganese, cerium, yttrium, lithium, sodium, calcium, strontium, vanadium, silver and combinations thereof.
  • FBC Fuel Borne Catalyst
  • FIG. 1 is a Sulfur Conversion Efficiency Comparison Graph
  • FIG. 2 is a Backpressure Change Graph
  • FIG. 3 is a Backpressure Change Comparison Graph
  • FBC Fluel Borne Catalyst
  • Conversion refers to the chemical alteration of at least one material into one or more other materials.
  • Catalyst refers to one or more materials that may be of use in the conversion of one or more other materials.
  • High Sulfur Fuel refers to fuel with a sulfur content of about 100 ppm or greater.
  • Low Sulfur Fuel refers to fuel with a sulfur content of about 50 ppm or fewer.
  • Platinum Group Metals refers to platinum, palladium, ruthenium, iridium, osmium, and rhodium.
  • FBCs Fuel Borne Catalysts
  • PBCs Fuel Borne Catalysts
  • Transition metals suitable for use in FBCs include iron, manganese, silver, and vanadium. These metals can be present in FBCs as any suitable compound, including long chain carboxylate salts with carbon chain lengths of 5 to 20 carbon atoms or, for iron, as ferrocene and ferrocene derivatives.
  • Suitable forms of silver may include: fuel soluble carboxylates, such as a long chain alkyl soap with 5-20 carbon atoms; a substituted benzoate salt with 10 or more carbon atoms, including a benzene ring; an acetylacetonate; and any suitable derivatives.
  • Forms of Vanadium suitable for incorporation as a fuel stable complex include various forms and oxidation states, such as VO(acac) 2 and derivatives, divalent V(cpd) 2 and derivatives, and V(OR 1 ) 2 (R 2 ) 2 (vanadium oxyalkyls and alkyls) where R contains at 4 or more carbon atoms and can be mixed oxyalkyl with alkyl or the alkyl or oxyalkyl may be all the same as in V(R) 4 .
  • Vanadium soaps of +4 and +5 oxidation states may also be of use, including amongst others V(OOCR) n , where R is an alkyl group containing 5 or more carbon atoms and n is 4 or 5.
  • transition metals suitable for use in FBCs include one or more rare earth metals, such as cerium and yttrium, and may be employed in any suitable form, including those listed in patents cited in this disclosure. Suitable forms include one or more soaps, acetylacetonates, and the like.
  • Suitable metals include Calcium, Strontium, Sodium, and Lithium.
  • Calcium and strontium may be present in the FBC in any suitable form, including long chain soaps, M(OOCR) 2 , where R contains at least 5 carbon atoms.
  • Sodium and lithium may also be supplied as long chain carboxylates with more than 9 carbon atoms.
  • Suitable co-solvents of this type include diethylene glycol monobutyl ether.
  • Other suitable co-solvents include ROH where R contains at least 6 carbons, octanol and other higher alcohols.
  • the exhaust gas of a typical diesel engine operating on a fuel containing 1000 ppm of Sulfur may contain 30 ppm of SO2 and about 0.3 to 0.6 ppm of S03.
  • Some catalysts including those using Pt on Al203, may increase the SO2 oxidation rate to 50% or more at temperatures as low as 250° C., which may result in over 15 ppm SO3 in the exhaust.
  • SO2 may also compete with oxidizable species for active sites on catalysts, and hence may affect NO, CO, HC, and Carbon oxidation. This in turn may result in an increase of the temperature required for Diesel Particulate Filter regeneration and an increase in Balance Point Temperature by as many as 33° C., though these increases may stop once sulfur concentrations in fuel reach 30 ppm or higher.
  • FIG. 1 shows Sulfur Conversion Graph 100 , showing the sulfur conversion efficiency of Platinum FBC 102 , Catalyst A 104 , Catalyst B 106 , and Catalyst C 108 , where Catalyst A 104 , Catalyst B 106 , and Catalyst C 108 are PGM containing non-FBC catalysts and the fuel contains Sulfur at a concentration of 500 ppm.
  • Platinum FBC 102 shows a very low sulfur conversion efficiency up to 450° C.
  • Catalyst A 104 , Catalyst B 106 , and Catalyst C 108 show a comparatively higher sulfur conversion efficiency at temperatures as low as 200° C.
  • SO2 may also diminish FBC PGM catalytic activity at concentrations above 10 ppm, including concentrations between 10 ppm and 30 ppm. This may result in unreliable regeneration at low FBC concentrations in the fuel and at moderate temperatures.
  • FBC formulations of use with high sulfur fuel include formulations containing one or more of the following and combinations thereof:
  • Additional materials of use in the fuel include:
  • FBCs including aforementioned materials may facilitate NO2 carbon oxidation mechanisms, while producing relatively small amounts of NO2 in the exhaust when compared to other catalyst systems.
  • NO2 may be a much more effective oxidizing agent than O2 for carbon-based PM soot
  • Soot loading is one of the limiting factors in DPF operation.
  • transition metals including Mn, Fe, and Cu
  • transition metals including Mn, Fe, and Cu
  • the addition of Na and Li additives to these types of FBC may allow regeneration at temperatures low enough to permit regeneration at high doses of metal and may show some promise in improving trap regeneration.
  • CO and HC reduction may not occur.
  • Methods suitable for enhancing DOC/FBC soot oxidation performance in high sulfur fuels include those functioning at the nanoscale level. These methods may not drive the bulk gas phase NO2 concentration to hundreds of ppm, but may instead enhance NO2 formation and reduce the ill effects of sulfur oxides at the Platinum-Transition Metal Oxide-Rare Earth Metal Oxide [Pt-TMO-REO] (or Platinum-Base Metal oxide [Pt-BMO]) crystallite surface.
  • Pt-TMO-REO Platinum-Transition Metal Oxide-Rare Earth Metal Oxide
  • Pt-BMO Platinum-Base Metal oxide
  • SO2 may temporarily inhibit the aforementioned mechanism by weak adsorption of SO2 on the nanoparticulate Pt-BMO complex. This may increase filter regeneration temperatures, which may be suitable if operating temperatures are suitably high.
  • Suitable alkali metals, including sodium or lithium, may be used as part of the FBC to continuously wet the Pt/BMO crystallite with a suitable peroxide film, including Na2O2/Li2O2, to reduce this problem.
  • NO 2 and especially nitrates, are very active surface defect initiators, and may thereby assist in the formation of surface oxygen complexes and the acceleration of soot oxidation.
  • SO2 may be adsorbed by the Pt and Pt-BMO crystallites in a weak surface association and inhibit the desired oxidation sequence.
  • Fuel Borne Catalysts may promote soot oxidation at low temperatures. Close contact between the (Pt)-BM oxide nanostructure and the carbon may allow the nitrate decomposition product to readily react with carbon in the soot, thereby creating high efficiency defects in the carbon soot structure.
  • FIG. 2 shows Reference FBC Backpressure Graph 200 , showing the behavior of a reference Pt FBC when used with Low Sulfur Fuel 202 and with High Sulfur Fuel 204 .
  • the decrease in average backpressure using Low Sulfur Fuel 202 in run 3-4 is indicative of regeneration, and is a behavior not shown by High Sulfur Fuel 204 .
  • FIG. 3 shows Backpressure Comparison Graph 300 , showing the behavior of Reference FBC with 15 ppm S 302 , Reference FBC with 1000 ppm S 304 , and HSF FBC with 1000 ppm S 306 .
  • the decrease in average backpressure using Reference FBC with 15 ppm S 302 in run 3-4 is indicative of regeneration, and is a behavior not shown by Reference FBC with 1000 ppm S 304 .
  • HSF FBC with 1000 ppm S 306 shows sign of regeneration in run 2-3.
  • the Reference FBC is a bi-metallic formulation containing only platinum and cerium that may very effectively cause filter regeneration (also as noted in the charts) used in low sulfur fuel but may be ineffective in a High Sulfur fuel containing 1000 ppm Sulfur.
  • the “HSF FBC” contains platinum, cerium and iron with a similar amount of total metal, but the amount of metal corresponding to cerium in “Reference FBC” is instead split between iron and cerium in “HSF FBC”. This use of this composition causes regeneration to occur with 1000 ppm S fuel under the same engine duty cycles (400 C exhaust temperature max), where the “reference” formulation failed.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)

Abstract

Fuel Borne Catalysts of use in High Sulfur Fuels are disclosed, where formulations may include any number of suitable platinum group metals, transition metals, rare earth metals, and alkaline earth metals, including platinum, palladium, iron, manganese, cerium, yttrium, lithium, sodium, calcium, strontium, vanadium, silver and combinations thereof.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • 1. Field of the Disclosure
  • The present disclosure relates generally to fuel additives, and more particularly to fuel borne catalysts of use in high sulfur fuels.
  • 2. Background information
  • Diesel engines are highly regarded for their efficiency and reliability. However, they may produce a level of pollution higher than that desired, and may need to have after-treatment strategies, including one or more of either a catalyzed Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) or Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC)—to control Particulate Matter (PM), Hydrocarbon (HC), and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions. High sulfur concentrations in the fuel may make some after-treatment devices ineffective due to fouling by sulfate and vigorous chemical attack by sulfur oxides on the DPF/DOC and the catalysts, as most active PGM catalysts for these oxidation reactions typically also catalytically oxidize SO2 to SO3, which in conjunction with water vapor forms sulfuric acid. SO2 may also compete with oxidizable species for active sites on catalysts, and hence may affect NO, CO, HC, and Carbon oxidation. This in turn may result in an increase of the temperature required for Diesel Particulate Filter regeneration and an increase in Balance Point Temperature.
  • As a result, a number of countries have mandated the use of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (USLD). However, fuels containing sulfur levels of up to 3000 ppm are still in use in various parts of the world—in some cases in spite of regulations to the contrary. These levels of sulfur may cause one or more of the aforementioned problems for after-treatment devices of use in the reduction of Particulate Matter (PM) emissions, including particulate filters and diesel oxidation catalysts. Reasons for these problems may include the ability of catalysts to oxidize both NO to NO2, a desired reaction, and SO2 to SO3, an undesired reaction.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present disclosure relates to Fuel Borne Catalyst (FBC) formulations of use with High Sulfur fuels, which may include platinum, palladium, iron, manganese, cerium, yttrium, lithium, sodium, calcium, strontium, vanadium, silver and combinations thereof.
  • LIST OF FIGURES
  • Embodiments of the present disclosure are described by way of example with reference to the accompanying figures, which are schematic and are not intended to be drawn to scale. Unless indicated as representing prior art, the figures represent aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 1 is a Sulfur Conversion Efficiency Comparison Graph
  • FIG. 2 is a Backpressure Change Graph
  • FIG. 3 is a Backpressure Change Comparison Graph
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION Definitions
  • As used herein, the following terms have the following definitions:
  • “Fuel Borne Catalyst (FBC)” refers to any material suitable for use as a catalyst able to be stored in fuel as one or more of a solute, colloid, or otherwise suspended material.
  • “Conversion” refers to the chemical alteration of at least one material into one or more other materials.
  • “Catalyst” refers to one or more materials that may be of use in the conversion of one or more other materials.
  • “High Sulfur Fuel” refers to fuel with a sulfur content of about 100 ppm or greater.
  • “Low Sulfur Fuel” refers to fuel with a sulfur content of about 50 ppm or fewer.
  • “Platinum Group Metals (PGMs)” refers to platinum, palladium, ruthenium, iridium, osmium, and rhodium.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Various example embodiments of the present disclosure are described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings in which some example embodiments of the present disclosure are shown. In the drawings, the thicknesses of layers and regions may be exaggerated for clarity. Detailed illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure are disclosed herein. However, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are merely representative for purposes of describing example embodiments of the present disclosure. This disclosure however, may be embodied in many alternate forms and should not be construed as limited to only the embodiments set forth herein.
  • Platinum and palladium compounds of use as Fuel Borne Catalysts (FBCs) include those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,892,562; U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,020; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,003,303. These include soaps, B-diketonates and alkyl and arylalkyl metal complexes. One or more of said compounds may be suspended in fuel or may be fuel soluble and fuel stable at dose rates, including rates below 0.5 ppm metal and as discussed in the patents cited above.
  • Transition metals suitable for use in FBCs include iron, manganese, silver, and vanadium. These metals can be present in FBCs as any suitable compound, including long chain carboxylate salts with carbon chain lengths of 5 to 20 carbon atoms or, for iron, as ferrocene and ferrocene derivatives. Suitable forms of silver may include: fuel soluble carboxylates, such as a long chain alkyl soap with 5-20 carbon atoms; a substituted benzoate salt with 10 or more carbon atoms, including a benzene ring; an acetylacetonate; and any suitable derivatives.
  • Forms of Vanadium suitable for incorporation as a fuel stable complex include various forms and oxidation states, such as VO(acac)2 and derivatives, divalent V(cpd)2 and derivatives, and V(OR1)2(R2)2 (vanadium oxyalkyls and alkyls) where R contains at 4 or more carbon atoms and can be mixed oxyalkyl with alkyl or the alkyl or oxyalkyl may be all the same as in V(R)4. Vanadium soaps of +4 and +5 oxidation states may also be of use, including amongst others V(OOCR)n, where R is an alkyl group containing 5 or more carbon atoms and n is 4 or 5.
  • Other transition metals suitable for use in FBCs include one or more rare earth metals, such as cerium and yttrium, and may be employed in any suitable form, including those listed in patents cited in this disclosure. Suitable forms include one or more soaps, acetylacetonates, and the like.
  • Other suitable metals include Calcium, Strontium, Sodium, and Lithium. Calcium and strontium may be present in the FBC in any suitable form, including long chain soaps, M(OOCR)2, where R contains at least 5 carbon atoms. Sodium and lithium may also be supplied as long chain carboxylates with more than 9 carbon atoms.
  • These may combine with long chain polar co-solvents to increase stability of relatively more polar alkali metal compounds, such as compounds of the type HOR1OR2OR3, where R is alkyl. Suitable co-solvents of this type include diethylene glycol monobutyl ether. Other suitable co-solvents include ROH where R contains at least 6 carbons, octanol and other higher alcohols.
  • SO3 and H2SO4 Formation
  • In the absence of catalysts, about 1-2% of SO2 in the engine exhaust may be converted to S03. High SO3 concentrations are favored by low temperatures. However, at low temperatures, the un-catalyzed reaction rates are insignificant-explaining why engine out SO3 is normally only about 1% of total sulfur oxides. SO3 reacts exothermically with the moisture present in the exhaust to form sulfuric acid and other sulfates that may readily foul filter surfaces and may cause operational problems.
  • The exhaust gas of a typical diesel engine operating on a fuel containing 1000 ppm of Sulfur may contain 30 ppm of SO2 and about 0.3 to 0.6 ppm of S03. Some catalysts, including those using Pt on Al203, may increase the SO2 oxidation rate to 50% or more at temperatures as low as 250° C., which may result in over 15 ppm SO3 in the exhaust. SO2 may also compete with oxidizable species for active sites on catalysts, and hence may affect NO, CO, HC, and Carbon oxidation. This in turn may result in an increase of the temperature required for Diesel Particulate Filter regeneration and an increase in Balance Point Temperature by as many as 33° C., though these increases may stop once sulfur concentrations in fuel reach 30 ppm or higher.
  • The use of similar metals in an FBC formulation may not induce these effects when the size of the catalyst particle is below about 40 nm.
  • FIG. 1 shows Sulfur Conversion Graph 100, showing the sulfur conversion efficiency of Platinum FBC 102, Catalyst A 104, Catalyst B 106, and Catalyst C 108, where Catalyst A 104, Catalyst B 106, and Catalyst C 108 are PGM containing non-FBC catalysts and the fuel contains Sulfur at a concentration of 500 ppm. Platinum FBC 102 shows a very low sulfur conversion efficiency up to 450° C., while Catalyst A 104, Catalyst B 106, and Catalyst C 108 show a comparatively higher sulfur conversion efficiency at temperatures as low as 200° C.
  • SO2 may also diminish FBC PGM catalytic activity at concentrations above 10 ppm, including concentrations between 10 ppm and 30 ppm. This may result in unreliable regeneration at low FBC concentrations in the fuel and at moderate temperatures. Li2O2—formed by combustion—may partially alleviate the problem of SO2 deactivation by wetting the Pt crystallite. However, lithium may not be a very effective metal oxidization catalyst, and and auxiliary heat pre-filter may be routinely required.
  • FBC Formulations
  • FBC formulations of use with high sulfur fuel include formulations containing one or more of the following and combinations thereof:
      • A platinum group metal—including Pt or Pd—at 0.01 to 0.5 ppm in the fuel
      • A transition metal—including Fe or Mn—at 1-10 ppm in the fuel
      • A rare earth metal—including Ce or Y—at 1-10 ppm in the fuel
  • Additional materials of use in the fuel include:
      • Li or Na at 0-3 ppm, which may be of use in activating the PGM catalyst
      • Ca or Sr at 0-3 ppm, which may act as a sulfate sink
      • V at 0-3 ppm, which may modify SO3 formation
      • Ag at 0-3 ppm
  • FBCs including aforementioned materials may facilitate NO2 carbon oxidation mechanisms, while producing relatively small amounts of NO2 in the exhaust when compared to other catalyst systems. The use of certain metallic FBC components—including platinum, palladium and combinations thereof—may provide negligible SO3 formation while maintaining carbon oxidation catalysis by nearest neighbor atom NO2 formation as described below. At temperatures similar to those commonly found in DOCs and DPFs, these NO2 enhanced oxidation reactions may dominate.
  • Increasing the concentration of NO2 in may be beneficial, since NO2 may be a much more effective oxidizing agent than O2 for carbon-based PM soot, Soot loading is one of the limiting factors in DPF operation.
  • When used in FBCs with no PGM content, transition metals including Mn, Fe, and Cu, may foul DPFs at the concentrations necessary. The addition of Na and Li additives to these types of FBC may allow regeneration at temperatures low enough to permit regeneration at high doses of metal and may show some promise in improving trap regeneration. However, CO and HC reduction may not occur.
  • Methods suitable for enhancing DOC/FBC soot oxidation performance in high sulfur fuels include those functioning at the nanoscale level. These methods may not drive the bulk gas phase NO2 concentration to hundreds of ppm, but may instead enhance NO2 formation and reduce the ill effects of sulfur oxides at the Platinum-Transition Metal Oxide-Rare Earth Metal Oxide [Pt-TMO-REO] (or Platinum-Base Metal oxide [Pt-BMO]) crystallite surface.
  • SO2 may temporarily inhibit the aforementioned mechanism by weak adsorption of SO2 on the nanoparticulate Pt-BMO complex. This may increase filter regeneration temperatures, which may be suitable if operating temperatures are suitably high. Suitable alkali metals, including sodium or lithium, may be used as part of the FBC to continuously wet the Pt/BMO crystallite with a suitable peroxide film, including Na2O2/Li2O2, to reduce this problem.
  • According to K. Krishna, M. Makkee, (“Pt—Ce-Soot generated from Fuel Borne Catalysts: Soot Oxidation Mechanism”, Topics in Catalysis, 42-43, 229-236 (2000)), the evidence is that nitrate rather than free NO2 itself is the most effective carbon oxidizer at the lowest temperatures and that NO2 complex formation is key to forming the C—ONO2 (or the precursors such as Pt-BM(NO2)(O)) carbon-nitrate oxidation couple that directly leads to carbon oxidation (and to some extent NOx reduction) by this mechanism. The oxidation of soot may take place via the so-called surface oxygen complexes. For soot oxidation to proceed readily, defects in the soot surface may be necessary. NO2, and especially nitrates, are very active surface defect initiators, and may thereby assist in the formation of surface oxygen complexes and the acceleration of soot oxidation. SO2 may be adsorbed by the Pt and Pt-BMO crystallites in a weak surface association and inhibit the desired oxidation sequence.
  • Fuel Borne Catalysts may promote soot oxidation at low temperatures. Close contact between the (Pt)-BM oxide nanostructure and the carbon may allow the nitrate decomposition product to readily react with carbon in the soot, thereby creating high efficiency defects in the carbon soot structure.
  • FIG. 2 shows Reference FBC Backpressure Graph 200, showing the behavior of a reference Pt FBC when used with Low Sulfur Fuel 202 and with High Sulfur Fuel 204. The decrease in average backpressure using Low Sulfur Fuel 202 in run 3-4 is indicative of regeneration, and is a behavior not shown by High Sulfur Fuel 204.
  • FIG. 3 shows Backpressure Comparison Graph 300, showing the behavior of Reference FBC with 15 ppm S 302, Reference FBC with 1000 ppm S 304, and HSF FBC with 1000 ppm S 306. As in FIG. 2, The decrease in average backpressure using Reference FBC with 15 ppm S 302 in run 3-4 is indicative of regeneration, and is a behavior not shown by Reference FBC with 1000 ppm S 304. However, HSF FBC with 1000 ppm S 306 shows sign of regeneration in run 2-3.
  • EXAMPLES Example 1
  • In this example, a comparison of the DPF backpressure characteristics for two FBC formulations is made. In this example, the Reference FBC is a bi-metallic formulation containing only platinum and cerium that may very effectively cause filter regeneration (also as noted in the charts) used in low sulfur fuel but may be ineffective in a High Sulfur fuel containing 1000 ppm Sulfur. In this example, the “HSF FBC” contains platinum, cerium and iron with a similar amount of total metal, but the amount of metal corresponding to cerium in “Reference FBC” is instead split between iron and cerium in “HSF FBC”. This use of this composition causes regeneration to occur with 1000 ppm S fuel under the same engine duty cycles (400 C exhaust temperature max), where the “reference” formulation failed.
  • Analysis of PM from these cycles indicate neither Reference FBC nor HSF FBC significantly generate SO3 or SO4 in high S fuel, as sulfate is below 10% of the PM for both cases by analysis and comparable to baseline measurements and, in neither case, is the amount of FBC metal in the PM greater than the amount of lube oil metals that may be normally present. The difference in filter regeneration performance is not due to the differences in total metal present or to differences in sulfate in the PM, but due to a differing mechanism which may reduce the adverse effects on PM carbon oxidation catalysis caused by high concentrations of SO2 in the exhaust when platinum, cerium and iron are all present, as compared to the reference case where similar amounts of only platinum and cerium are present.

Claims (23)

I claim:
1. A method of improving the operation of a diesel engine operating with high sulfur fuel, the method comprising the steps of:
providing for adding to a diesel fuel of a fuel borne catalyst in an effective amount to lower the emissions of unburned hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide, the fuel borne catalyst comprising:
a platinum group metal composition comprising at least one material selected from the group consisting of platinum, and palladium, or mixtures thereof;
at least one rare earth metal selected from the group consisting of cerium, and yttrium, or mixtures thereof; and
at least one transition metal compound comprising iron, and manganese, or mixtures thereof, and
providing for operating of the diesel engine by burning the fuel over a sufficient period of time to produce exhaust gases and achieve a sustained reduction in unburned hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the fuel borne catalyst comprises about 1 to about 10 ppm of the at least one rare earth metal.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the fuel borne catalyst comprises about 0.5 ppm of the platinum group metal composition.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the fuel borne catalyst comprises about 1 to about 10 ppm of the at least one transition metal compound.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein total concentration of the at least one rare earth metal, the platinum group metal composition, and the at least one transition metal compound is less than about 15 ppm.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the fuel borne catalyst further comprises less than about 3 ppm of at least one material selected from the group consisting of silver, vanadium, and palladium, or mixtures thereof.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the fuel borne catalyst further comprises less than about 3 ppm of at least one material selected from the group consisting of calcium, and strontium, or mixtures thereof.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the fuel borne catalyst further comprises less than about 3 ppm of at least one material selected from the group consisting of sodium, and lithium or mixtures thereof.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one rare earth metal is fuel soluble.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one fuel soluble transition metal compound is fuel soluble.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the platinum group metal composition is fuel soluble.
12. A method for improving operation of a diesel engine by lowering emissions of unburned hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide, the method comprising the steps of:
providing for a presence of a diesel fuel and combustion air;
providing a fuel borne catalyst comprising a platinum group metal composition comprising at least one material selected from the group consisting of platinum, and palladium, or mixtures thereof, at least one rare earth metal selected from the group consisting of cerium, and yttrium, or mixtures thereof, and at least one transition metal compound comprising iron, and manganese, or mixtures thereof;
providing for combusting of the fuel in a diesel engine to produce exhaust gases; and,
providing for directing of exhaust gases into an exhaust system;
wherein the fuel borne catalyst is introduced into the fuel, the exhaust gases or the combustion air, in amounts effective to provide the fuel borne catalyst in the exhaust system at a level of up to 1 ppm based on a volume of fuel burned to produce the exhaust gases.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising the step of: providing at least one filter comprising at least one material selected from the group consisting of platinum, palladium or mixtures thereof, and having a particle size less than about 40 nm.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the fuel borne catalyst comprises about 1 to about 10 ppm of the at least one rare earth metal.
15. The method of claim 12, wherein the fuel borne catalyst comprises about 0.5 ppm of the platinum group metal composition.
16. The method of claim 12, wherein the fuel borne catalyst comprises about 1 to about 10 ppm of the at least one transition metal compound.
17. The method of claim 12, wherein total concentration of the at least one rare earth metal, the platinum group metal composition, and the at least one transition metal compound is less than about 15 ppm.
18. The method of claim 12, wherein the fuel borne catalyst further comprises less than 3 ppm of at least one material selected from the group consisting of silver, vanadium, and palladium, or mixtures thereof.
19. The method of claim 12, wherein the fuel borne catalyst further comprises less than 3 ppm of at least one material selected from the group consisting of calcium, and strontium, or mixtures thereof.
20. The method of claim 12, wherein the fuel borne catalyst further comprises less than 3 ppm of at least one material selected from the group consisting of sodium, and lithium, or mixtures thereof.
21. The method of claim 12, wherein the at least one rare earth metal is fuel soluble.
22. The method of claim 12, wherein the at least one transition metal compound is fuel soluble.
23. The method of claim 12, wherein the platinum group metal composition is fuel soluble.
US13/856,873 2013-04-04 2013-04-04 Fuel Borne Catalysts for Sulfur Rich Fuels Abandoned US20140298714A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/856,873 US20140298714A1 (en) 2013-04-04 2013-04-04 Fuel Borne Catalysts for Sulfur Rich Fuels
PCT/US2014/033033 WO2014165797A1 (en) 2013-04-04 2014-04-04 Fuel borne catalyst for sulfur rich fuels

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/856,873 US20140298714A1 (en) 2013-04-04 2013-04-04 Fuel Borne Catalysts for Sulfur Rich Fuels

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140298714A1 true US20140298714A1 (en) 2014-10-09

Family

ID=51653486

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/856,873 Abandoned US20140298714A1 (en) 2013-04-04 2013-04-04 Fuel Borne Catalysts for Sulfur Rich Fuels

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20140298714A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2014165797A1 (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9475004B2 (en) 2014-06-06 2016-10-25 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Rhodium-iron catalysts
US9511350B2 (en) 2013-05-10 2016-12-06 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (Cdti) ZPGM Diesel Oxidation Catalysts and methods of making and using same
US9511353B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-12-06 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (Cdti) Firing (calcination) process and method related to metallic substrates coated with ZPGM catalyst
US9511358B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2016-12-06 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Spinel compositions and applications thereof
US9545626B2 (en) 2013-07-12 2017-01-17 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Optimization of Zero-PGM washcoat and overcoat loadings on metallic substrate
US9555400B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2017-01-31 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Synergized PGM catalyst systems including platinum for TWC application
US9700841B2 (en) 2015-03-13 2017-07-11 Byd Company Limited Synergized PGM close-coupled catalysts for TWC applications
US9731279B2 (en) 2014-10-30 2017-08-15 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Thermal stability of copper-manganese spinel as Zero PGM catalyst for TWC application
US9771534B2 (en) 2013-06-06 2017-09-26 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (Cdti) Diesel exhaust treatment systems and methods
US9861964B1 (en) 2016-12-13 2018-01-09 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Enhanced catalytic activity at the stoichiometric condition of zero-PGM catalysts for TWC applications
US9951706B2 (en) 2015-04-21 2018-04-24 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Calibration strategies to improve spinel mixed metal oxides catalytic converters
US10265684B2 (en) 2017-05-04 2019-04-23 Cdti Advanced Materials, Inc. Highly active and thermally stable coated gasoline particulate filters
US10533472B2 (en) 2016-05-12 2020-01-14 Cdti Advanced Materials, Inc. Application of synergized-PGM with ultra-low PGM loadings as close-coupled three-way catalysts for internal combustion engines

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5743922A (en) * 1992-07-22 1998-04-28 Nalco Fuel Tech Enhanced lubricity diesel fuel emulsions for reduction of nitrogen oxides
US6003303A (en) * 1993-01-11 1999-12-21 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Methods for reducing harmful emissions from a diesel engine
US6023928A (en) * 1997-04-17 2000-02-15 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Method for reducing emissions from a diesel engine
US6051040A (en) * 1988-12-28 2000-04-18 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Method for reducing emissions of NOx and particulates from a diesel engine
US20050002838A1 (en) * 2003-07-02 2005-01-06 Gurli Mogensen Diesel particulate filter
US20090249769A1 (en) * 2008-04-04 2009-10-08 Universal Cleanair Technologies, Inc Thermal converter devices, systems and control methods

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6051040A (en) * 1988-12-28 2000-04-18 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Method for reducing emissions of NOx and particulates from a diesel engine
US5743922A (en) * 1992-07-22 1998-04-28 Nalco Fuel Tech Enhanced lubricity diesel fuel emulsions for reduction of nitrogen oxides
US6003303A (en) * 1993-01-11 1999-12-21 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Methods for reducing harmful emissions from a diesel engine
US6023928A (en) * 1997-04-17 2000-02-15 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Method for reducing emissions from a diesel engine
US20050002838A1 (en) * 2003-07-02 2005-01-06 Gurli Mogensen Diesel particulate filter
US20090249769A1 (en) * 2008-04-04 2009-10-08 Universal Cleanair Technologies, Inc Thermal converter devices, systems and control methods

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9511353B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-12-06 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (Cdti) Firing (calcination) process and method related to metallic substrates coated with ZPGM catalyst
US9511350B2 (en) 2013-05-10 2016-12-06 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (Cdti) ZPGM Diesel Oxidation Catalysts and methods of making and using same
US9771534B2 (en) 2013-06-06 2017-09-26 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (Cdti) Diesel exhaust treatment systems and methods
US9545626B2 (en) 2013-07-12 2017-01-17 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Optimization of Zero-PGM washcoat and overcoat loadings on metallic substrate
US9555400B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2017-01-31 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Synergized PGM catalyst systems including platinum for TWC application
US9511358B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2016-12-06 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Spinel compositions and applications thereof
US9475004B2 (en) 2014-06-06 2016-10-25 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Rhodium-iron catalysts
US9579604B2 (en) 2014-06-06 2017-02-28 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Base metal activated rhodium coatings for catalysts in three-way catalyst (TWC) applications
US9475005B2 (en) 2014-06-06 2016-10-25 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Three-way catalyst systems including Fe-activated Rh and Ba-Pd material compositions
US9731279B2 (en) 2014-10-30 2017-08-15 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Thermal stability of copper-manganese spinel as Zero PGM catalyst for TWC application
US9700841B2 (en) 2015-03-13 2017-07-11 Byd Company Limited Synergized PGM close-coupled catalysts for TWC applications
US9951706B2 (en) 2015-04-21 2018-04-24 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Calibration strategies to improve spinel mixed metal oxides catalytic converters
US10533472B2 (en) 2016-05-12 2020-01-14 Cdti Advanced Materials, Inc. Application of synergized-PGM with ultra-low PGM loadings as close-coupled three-way catalysts for internal combustion engines
US9861964B1 (en) 2016-12-13 2018-01-09 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Enhanced catalytic activity at the stoichiometric condition of zero-PGM catalysts for TWC applications
US10265684B2 (en) 2017-05-04 2019-04-23 Cdti Advanced Materials, Inc. Highly active and thermally stable coated gasoline particulate filters

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2014165797A1 (en) 2014-10-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20140298714A1 (en) Fuel Borne Catalysts for Sulfur Rich Fuels
US9771534B2 (en) Diesel exhaust treatment systems and methods
Neyestanaki et al. Deactivation of postcombustion catalysts, a review
KR100279484B1 (en) Method for reducing harmful emissions from diesel engines equipped with particulate traps
JP5628071B2 (en) Treatment method of compression ignition engine exhaust gas
US8318629B2 (en) Platinum group metal-free catalysts for reducing the ignition temperature of particulates on a diesel particulate filter
KR100469066B1 (en) A catalytic filter for the removal of soot particulates from diesel engine and method of making the same
CA2652241A1 (en) Improvements in diesel particulate control
KR100319922B1 (en) catalyst for reduction of exhaust gas from diesel engine
WO1995002655A1 (en) METHOD FOR REDUCING EMISSIONS OF NOx AND PARTICULATES FROM A DIESEL ENGINE
KR100370903B1 (en) Method for Treating by Combustion Carbon-Containing Particles in an Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Circuit
US9243539B2 (en) Catalyst composition
KR20150120460A (en) Catalyst and method for the reduction of nitrogen oxides
US8986637B2 (en) Bimetallic catalyst
US11305260B2 (en) Catalyst for gasoline engine exhaust gas aftertreatment
Sonawane et al. Engine emission control devices for particulate matter and oxides of nitrogen: challenges and emerging trends
JPH09239276A (en) Exhaust gas purification catalyst
KR102800384B1 (en) Catalysts for combustion of carbon particulate matter using silver loaded lanthanum-cerium oxide support, and method for carbon particulate matter combustion using the catalyst
UCHISAWA et al. Soot oxidation in particulate filter regeneration
Obita et al. Selective Catalytic Reduction Techniques for Postcombustion Control of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From a Diesel Engine
More Emerging nonnoble metal nanocatalysts for complete mitigation of combustion generated CO, NOx, and unburnt hydrocarbons
KR20120054447A (en) Perovskite-based catalyst with improved sulfur resistance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGY INC (CDTI), CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SPRAGUE, BARRY;REEL/FRAME:031150/0708

Effective date: 20130815

AS Assignment

Owner name: CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (CDTI);REEL/FRAME:036933/0646

Effective date: 20151019

AS Assignment

Owner name: CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (CDTI), CALIFORNIA

Free format text: NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:SPRAGUE, BARRY;REEL/FRAME:039074/0903

Effective date: 20160602

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION