US20110017089A1 - Cavity-running projectile having a telescoping nose - Google Patents
Cavity-running projectile having a telescoping nose Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110017089A1 US20110017089A1 US12/102,784 US10278408A US2011017089A1 US 20110017089 A1 US20110017089 A1 US 20110017089A1 US 10278408 A US10278408 A US 10278408A US 2011017089 A1 US2011017089 A1 US 2011017089A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- projectile
- segments
- diameter
- nose
- sensor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B19/00—Marine torpedoes, e.g. launched by surface vessels or submarines; Sea mines having self-propulsion means
- F42B19/005—Nose caps for torpedoes; Coupling torpedo-case parts together
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B10/00—Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
- F42B10/32—Range-reducing or range-increasing arrangements; Fall-retarding means
- F42B10/38—Range-increasing arrangements
- F42B10/42—Streamlined projectiles
- F42B10/46—Streamlined nose cones; Windshields; Radomes
Definitions
- the present invention relates to underwater projectiles having a supercavitating running mode.
- a supercavitating projectile's main features are a specially shaped nose and a streamlined, hydrodynamic, and aerodynamic body.
- the nose has a blunt leading surface that is referred to as a “cavitator.”
- the cavitator deflects water outward so fast that the water flow separates and detaches from the surface of the projectile. Since water pressure takes time to collapse the wall of the resulting cavity, the nose opens an extended bubble of water vapor.
- the cavity can extend to envelop the entire projectile except the nose.
- One engulfed by the bubble the drag experienced by the projectile is significantly reduced.
- a projectile moving in the cavity (“cavity-running”) can travel at far greater speeds for a given amount of thrust than a projectile that is moving in a conventional manner through water.
- a cavity-running projectile quite literally “flies” through the surrounding gas. In the absence of sustaining propulsion, the projectile loses supercavitation and eventually stalls due to drag.
- a secondary benefit of cavity running is that the motion stability of the projectile is enhanced.
- the present invention provides a way to increase the distance over which a projectile is cable of sustaining a cavity-running mode.
- a projectile having a cavity-running mode is provided with velocity and/or depth/pressure sensors and a means for changing the diameter of its nose. Based on changes in conditions, as measured by the sensors, the diameter of the nose can be actively reduced or increased, as required, to maintain a diameter that best satisfies the optimum value for the nose-to-body diameter ratio.
- the forward-most portion of the nose is configured as a plurality of nested, right-circular cylindrical shells or segments.
- the diameter of nose i.e., cavitator
- the means for changing nose diameter can be suitably implemented as a MEMS device configured as an actuator and coupled to a drive train, wherein the drive train couples to the various segments of the forward portion of the nose.
- a MEMS device configured as an actuator and coupled to a drive train, wherein the drive train couples to the various segments of the forward portion of the nose.
- a simplified (i.e., less “intelligent”) version of an actuator such as a series of spring latches, can be used to adjust the diameter of the nose by sequentially releasing segments of the nose, etc.
- FIG. 1 depicts a schematic of a projectile in accordance with the illustrative embodiment, wherein the cavitator portion of the nose comprises a plurality of nested cylindrical segments, and wherein the cavitator section is shown at maximum diameter.
- FIG. 2 depicts the projectile of FIG. 1 wherein the nested segments of the cavitator are partially retracted, and wherein the cavitator section is shown at a minimum diameter.
- FIG. 3 depicts the projectile of FIG. 1 wherein some of the segments of the cavitator are retracted such that the cavitator section has an intermediate diameter.
- FIG. 4 depicts an end-on view of several of the segments of the cavitator, wherein the segments are separated from one another for pedagogical purposes.
- FIG. 5 depicts an end-on view of the segments of FIG. 4 when the segments are in their nominal nested arrangement. This Figure illustrates that the forward surface of the cavitator is a continuous surface.
- FIG. 1 depicts projectile 100 in accordance with the illustrative embodiment.
- the projectile includes nose 102 and body 112 (both shown in partial section).
- Nose 102 comprises forward-most section or cavitator 104 .
- Forward face 108 of nose 102 is blunt so that when projectile 100 achieves suitable velocity, a cavity-running mode of operation is created.
- the blunt face 108 pushes aside water as it advances.
- the hydrodynamic pressure of water that is pushed aside overcomes the ambient static pressure, the water vaporizes.
- the vaporized water forms air bubbles, which coalesce to form a “cavity” in the water. If enough bubbles are formed, the cavity will be large enough to completely engulf the projectile (with the exception of the blunt tip of the nose). Since the projectile is then surrounded by air, rather than water, hydrodynamic drag is substantially reduced.
- forward face 108 and/or segment 104 is therefore referred to as a “cavitator.”
- reference to “the diameter of the nose” means the diameter of cavitator 104 .
- each segment 106 - i has a diameter that is different than every other segment 106 - i .
- the nesting segments are cylindrical; however, in other embodiments, they are right-circular conical segments.
- forward face 108 is a substantially flat, substantially continuous surface. As such, and as will become clearer in conjunction with FIGS. 4 and 5 , the forward face of all segments 106 - i in FIG. 1 are co-planar or flush with one another (although this is not depicted in FIG. 1 for pedagogical purposes).
- each segment 106 - i is independently movable via the operation of actuator 216 and drive line 214 , to which the segments are operatively coupled.
- FIG. 2 depicts the segments 106 - 2 through 106 - 9 retracted to a successively greater extent, such that segment 106 - 1 becomes the forward most segment and, in fact, defines cavitator 104 . This has the effect of reducing the diameter of nose 102 .
- projectile 100 has its maximum nose diameter wherein all segments 106 are fully extended. In such a state, cavitator 104 comprises all segments 106 .
- projectile 100 has its minimum nose diameter, and cavitator 104 comprises only segment 106 - 1 .
- FIG. 3 depicts and embodiment in which segments 106 - 4 through 106 - 9 are retracted so that cavitator 104 is defined by segments 106 - 1 , 106 - 2 , and 106 - 3 .
- projectile 100 has a nose diameter that is intermediate between that shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 .
- FIG. 4 depicts front views of segments 106 - 1 , 106 - 2 , and 106 - 3 .
- the segments are separated from one another in the FIG. 4 for explanatory purposes.
- Segment 106 - 1 which has the smallest diameter, is “solid,” or otherwise has a continuous forward face 107 .
- Segment 106 - 2 which is the next largest segment after 106 - 1 , has an open region 430 - 2 that receives face 107 of segment 106 - 1 .
- Segment 106 - 2 also includes a solid-surface marginal regional 432 - 2 that represents the increment in diameter beyond segment 106 - 1 .
- next-largest segment 106 - 3 has an open region 430 - 3 for receiving the surface that is collectively defined by marginal region 430 - 2 and face 107 .
- Segment 106 - 3 also includes marginal region 432 - 3 that represents the increase in diameter over segment 106 - 2 .
- FIG. 5 depicts these three segments end on in the normal nested arrangement.
- face 107 (of segment 106 - 1 ), marginal region 432 - 2 (of segment 106 - 2 ), and marginal region 432 - 3 (of segment 106 - 3 ) are flush, defining face 108 .
- This is representative of a “front view’ of FIG. 3 . It is face 108 that “sees” water and creates the supercavitation phenomena, as previously described.
- All other segments are configured in the manner of segments 106 - 2 and 106 - 3 to enable nesting and to provide, a “solid” or continuous forward face 108 to cavitator 104 , regardless of how many segments 106 - i define the cavitator.
- projectile 100 includes velocity sensor 220 .
- projectile 100 includes depth (or pressure) sensor 222 .
- projectile 100 includes both velocity sensor 220 and depth (pressure) sensor 222 .
- processor 218 uses velocity and/or depth measurements obtained by the sensors to calculate an “optimal” nose-to-body diameter ratio for those conditions.
- the nose-to-body diameter ratio can be “optimized” on a variety of different bases. For example, it can be optimized based on providing the maximum range. Or it can be optimized based on minimizing the amount of thrust required to maintain supercavitation operation (i.e., the cavity-running mode). Those skilled in the art will recognize that additional bases for optimization exist.
- processor 112 calculates an optimal nose diameter (i.e., cavitator diameter) using the expression:
- body diameter D b is fixed and known, and the velocity is obtained from sensor 114 , a new nose diameter is readily calculated.
- Processor 218 determines which one or more segments 106 - i should be moved to achieve the new “optimal” nose-to-body diameter ratio. Signals indicative of which segment(s) to move and by how much are generated by processor 218 and transmitted to a driver (not depicted). The driver generates signals appropriate for controlling actuator 216 to extend or withdraw drive line 214 , as appropriate.
- the nose diameter is determined by the diameter of cavitator 104 . But that does not dictate the extent to segments 106 - i that are not part of the cavitator 104 must be retracted.
- FIG. 2 depicts a minimum nose diameter wherein only segment 106 - 1 is fully extended to serve as cavitator 104 , while the remaining segments are incrementally retracted. In other states, the remaining segments can be retracted to a different extent.
- the optimal nose diameter (the diameter that sustains a cavity-running mode for the available thrust and the operating depth) is given by:
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Measurement Of Velocity Or Position Using Acoustic Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This case claims priority of the following U.S. Provisional Patent Applications: Ser. No. 60/911,419 filed on Apr. 12, 2007, Ser. No. 60/992,025 filed on Dec. 3, 2007, and Ser. No. 61/033,418 filed on Mar. 3, 2008. All of these Provisional Patent Applications are incorporated by reference herein.
- The present invention relates to underwater projectiles having a supercavitating running mode.
- Research and development is currently underway to produce underwater projectiles that travel at very high speeds using the phenomenon of “supercavitation.” A progenitor of such projectiles is the “Shkval,” which is a rocket-propelled torpedo that was developed by Russia and achieves a velocity of 250 knots (288 mph).
- A supercavitating projectile's main features are a specially shaped nose and a streamlined, hydrodynamic, and aerodynamic body. The nose has a blunt leading surface that is referred to as a “cavitator.” When the projectile travels through water at speeds in excess of about one hundred miles per hour, the cavitator deflects water outward so fast that the water flow separates and detaches from the surface of the projectile. Since water pressure takes time to collapse the wall of the resulting cavity, the nose opens an extended bubble of water vapor.
- Given sufficient speed, the cavity can extend to envelop the entire projectile except the nose. One engulfed by the bubble, the drag experienced by the projectile is significantly reduced. As a consequence, a projectile moving in the cavity (“cavity-running”) can travel at far greater speeds for a given amount of thrust than a projectile that is moving in a conventional manner through water. A cavity-running projectile quite literally “flies” through the surrounding gas. In the absence of sustaining propulsion, the projectile loses supercavitation and eventually stalls due to drag. A secondary benefit of cavity running is that the motion stability of the projectile is enhanced.
- The present invention provides a way to increase the distance over which a projectile is cable of sustaining a cavity-running mode.
- There is an “optimum” value for the nose-to-body ratio of a projectile when operating underwater in a cavity-running mode. This optimum value is a function, primarily, of the prevailing pressure (i.e., depth and water density) and velocity. Therefore, as long as the projectile maintains a horizontal trajectory and constant speed, the optimum value for this ratio does not change. Once the projectile deviates from a horizontal path, the optimal value will, of course, change.
- It has been recognized by the inventor that it would be advantageous to be able to actively and dynamically adjust the nose-to-body ratio to maintain an optimum value. Doing so maximizes the distance for which the projectile remains in the cavity-running mode. And that maximizes the speed of the projectile and distance that it can ultimately travel.
- In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, a projectile having a cavity-running mode is provided with velocity and/or depth/pressure sensors and a means for changing the diameter of its nose. Based on changes in conditions, as measured by the sensors, the diameter of the nose can be actively reduced or increased, as required, to maintain a diameter that best satisfies the optimum value for the nose-to-body diameter ratio.
- In some embodiments, the forward-most portion of the nose is configured as a plurality of nested, right-circular cylindrical shells or segments. By withdrawing or adding segments in the manner of the movement of a “spy-glass” or telescoping antennae, the diameter of nose (i.e., cavitator) is changed.
- The means for changing nose diameter can be suitably implemented as a MEMS device configured as an actuator and coupled to a drive train, wherein the drive train couples to the various segments of the forward portion of the nose. In conjunction with the present disclosure, those skilled in the art will be able to design and build such a mechanism.
- In some other embodiments, a simplified (i.e., less “intelligent”) version of an actuator, such as a series of spring latches, can be used to adjust the diameter of the nose by sequentially releasing segments of the nose, etc.
-
FIG. 1 depicts a schematic of a projectile in accordance with the illustrative embodiment, wherein the cavitator portion of the nose comprises a plurality of nested cylindrical segments, and wherein the cavitator section is shown at maximum diameter. -
FIG. 2 depicts the projectile ofFIG. 1 wherein the nested segments of the cavitator are partially retracted, and wherein the cavitator section is shown at a minimum diameter. -
FIG. 3 depicts the projectile ofFIG. 1 wherein some of the segments of the cavitator are retracted such that the cavitator section has an intermediate diameter. -
FIG. 4 depicts an end-on view of several of the segments of the cavitator, wherein the segments are separated from one another for pedagogical purposes. -
FIG. 5 depicts an end-on view of the segments ofFIG. 4 when the segments are in their nominal nested arrangement. This Figure illustrates that the forward surface of the cavitator is a continuous surface. -
FIG. 1 depictsprojectile 100 in accordance with the illustrative embodiment. The projectile includesnose 102 and body 112 (both shown in partial section).Nose 102 comprises forward-most section orcavitator 104. -
Forward face 108 ofnose 102 is blunt so that whenprojectile 100 achieves suitable velocity, a cavity-running mode of operation is created. In particular, theblunt face 108 pushes aside water as it advances. When the hydrodynamic pressure of water that is pushed aside overcomes the ambient static pressure, the water vaporizes. The vaporized water forms air bubbles, which coalesce to form a “cavity” in the water. If enough bubbles are formed, the cavity will be large enough to completely engulf the projectile (with the exception of the blunt tip of the nose). Since the projectile is then surrounded by air, rather than water, hydrodynamic drag is substantially reduced. - For the foregoing reason,
forward face 108 and/orsegment 104 is therefore referred to as a “cavitator.” For the purposes of this specification, including the appended claims, reference to “the diameter of the nose” means the diameter ofcavitator 104. - As depicted in
FIG. 1 ,cavitator 104 comprises one or more nesting segments 106-i, i=1, n (collectively referenced as “segments 106”). In the illustrative embodiment, i=9; that is, there are ninesegments 106. - To permit nesting, each segment 106-i has a diameter that is different than every other segment 106-i. In the illustrative embodiment, the nesting segments are cylindrical; however, in other embodiments, they are right-circular conical segments. Note that in the illustrative embodiment,
forward face 108 is a substantially flat, substantially continuous surface. As such, and as will become clearer in conjunction withFIGS. 4 and 5 , the forward face of all segments 106-i inFIG. 1 are co-planar or flush with one another (although this is not depicted inFIG. 1 for pedagogical purposes). - As depicted in
FIG. 2 , each segment 106-i is independently movable via the operation ofactuator 216 anddrive line 214, to which the segments are operatively coupled.FIG. 2 depicts the segments 106-2 through 106-9 retracted to a successively greater extent, such that segment 106-1 becomes the forward most segment and, in fact, definescavitator 104. This has the effect of reducing the diameter ofnose 102. - Thus, in the state that is depicted in
FIG. 1 , projectile 100 has its maximum nose diameter wherein allsegments 106 are fully extended. In such a state,cavitator 104 comprises allsegments 106. By contrast, in the state depicted inFIG. 2 , projectile 100 has its minimum nose diameter, andcavitator 104 comprises only segment 106-1. -
FIG. 3 depicts and embodiment in which segments 106-4 through 106-9 are retracted so thatcavitator 104 is defined by segments 106-1, 106-2, and 106-3. In this state, projectile 100 has a nose diameter that is intermediate between that shown inFIGS. 1 and 2 . - As previously noted,
forward surface 108 ofcavitator 104 is substantially continuous. One way to accomplish this is depicted inFIGS. 4 and 5 .FIG. 4 depicts front views of segments 106-1, 106-2, and 106-3. The segments are separated from one another in theFIG. 4 for explanatory purposes. Segment 106-1, which has the smallest diameter, is “solid,” or otherwise has a continuousforward face 107. Segment 106-2, which is the next largest segment after 106-1, has an open region 430-2 that receivesface 107 of segment 106-1. Segment 106-2 also includes a solid-surface marginal regional 432-2 that represents the increment in diameter beyond segment 106-1. Likewise, next-largest segment 106-3 has an open region 430-3 for receiving the surface that is collectively defined by marginal region 430-2 andface 107. Segment 106-3 also includes marginal region 432-3 that represents the increase in diameter over segment 106-2. -
FIG. 5 depicts these three segments end on in the normal nested arrangement. In the state depicted inFIG. 5 , face 107 (of segment 106-1), marginal region 432-2 (of segment 106-2), and marginal region 432-3 (of segment 106-3) are flush, definingface 108. This is representative of a “front view’ ofFIG. 3 . It isface 108 that “sees” water and creates the supercavitation phenomena, as previously described. - All other segments are configured in the manner of segments 106-2 and 106-3 to enable nesting and to provide, a “solid” or continuous
forward face 108 tocavitator 104, regardless of how many segments 106-i define the cavitator. - Returning to
FIG. 2 , the telescoping operation ofnose 102 is controlled viaprocessor 218, based on input from one or more sensors. In some embodiments, projectile 100 includesvelocity sensor 220. In some other embodiments, projectile 100 includes depth (or pressure)sensor 222. In yet some further embodiments, projectile 100 includes bothvelocity sensor 220 and depth (pressure)sensor 222. As described further below,processor 218 uses velocity and/or depth measurements obtained by the sensors to calculate an “optimal” nose-to-body diameter ratio for those conditions. - The nose-to-body diameter ratio can be “optimized” on a variety of different bases. For example, it can be optimized based on providing the maximum range. Or it can be optimized based on minimizing the amount of thrust required to maintain supercavitation operation (i.e., the cavity-running mode). Those skilled in the art will recognize that additional bases for optimization exist.
- For example, in some embodiments,
processor 112 calculates an optimal nose diameter (i.e., cavitator diameter) using the expression: -
D n *=D b/([0.550783×V 0]+0.157122) [1] -
- Wherein:
- Dn*=optimal nose diameter;
- Db=body diameter; and
- Vo=velocity of the projectile.
The foregoing equation was obtained by curve fitting solutions of Dn* against different values of Vo, wherein Vo is the initial velocity of a projectile normalized to the characteristic velocity Vc at the depth of the (horizontally moving) projectile. Vc=(2P/ρwater), where P is the static drag and ρwater is the density of water at the relevant temperature. Interpreting Vo as the current velocity of projectile (as if the projectile was just launched at the current depth), the instantaneous optimal nose diameter Dn* is given by expression [1].
- Wherein:
- Since body diameter Db is fixed and known, and the velocity is obtained from sensor 114, a new nose diameter is readily calculated.
-
Processor 218 determines which one or more segments 106-i should be moved to achieve the new “optimal” nose-to-body diameter ratio. Signals indicative of which segment(s) to move and by how much are generated byprocessor 218 and transmitted to a driver (not depicted). The driver generates signals appropriate for controllingactuator 216 to extend or withdrawdrive line 214, as appropriate. - It will be appreciated that a variety of “nose” configurations can be adopted for any specified nose diameter. In particular, the nose diameter is determined by the diameter of
cavitator 104. But that does not dictate the extent to segments 106-i that are not part of thecavitator 104 must be retracted. For example,FIG. 2 depicts a minimum nose diameter wherein only segment 106-1 is fully extended to serve ascavitator 104, while the remaining segments are incrementally retracted. In other states, the remaining segments can be retracted to a different extent. - The extent to which the remaining segments are retracted will be dependent upon aerodynamic considerations, among other factors, and is within the competency of those skilled in the art.
- Alternate expressions are available for determining optimal nose diameter. For example, for a cavity-running projectile that is under thrust, F, the optimal nose diameter (the diameter that sustains a cavity-running mode for the available thrust and the operating depth) is given by:
-
D N*=0.29×(F/(ρwater gH+ATM)0.5, [2] -
- wherein:
- F is the applied thrust;
- H is the depth of the projectile under water;
- ATM is the water pressure bearing on the projectile;
- ρwater is the density of the water at the relevant temperature; and
- g is the acceleration due to gravity.
- wherein:
- It is to be understood that the disclosure teaches just one example of the illustrative embodiment and that many variations of the invention can easily be devised by those skilled in the art after reading this disclosure and that the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the following claims.
Claims (15)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/102,784 US7874251B1 (en) | 2007-04-12 | 2008-04-14 | Cavity-running projectile having a telescoping nose |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US91141907P | 2007-04-12 | 2007-04-12 | |
US12/102,784 US7874251B1 (en) | 2007-04-12 | 2008-04-14 | Cavity-running projectile having a telescoping nose |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US7874251B1 US7874251B1 (en) | 2011-01-25 |
US20110017089A1 true US20110017089A1 (en) | 2011-01-27 |
Family
ID=43479685
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/102,784 Expired - Fee Related US7874251B1 (en) | 2007-04-12 | 2008-04-14 | Cavity-running projectile having a telescoping nose |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7874251B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8146501B1 (en) * | 2008-03-03 | 2012-04-03 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Supercavitating projectile having a morphable nose |
US8487227B2 (en) * | 2009-11-08 | 2013-07-16 | Omnitek Partners Llc | Speed-adaptive deployable boat-tailing cone for munitions for range extension |
US20140311373A1 (en) * | 2012-07-25 | 2014-10-23 | Ward Kraft, Inc. | Special Purpose Slugs For Use In Ammunition |
US20150241182A1 (en) * | 2012-07-25 | 2015-08-27 | Ward Kraft, Inc. | Special Purpose Slugs For Use In Ammunition |
KR101570323B1 (en) * | 2015-06-19 | 2015-11-18 | 충남대학교산학협력단 | Cavitator System of the Supercavitating Underwater Vehicle using Compressed Air Tank |
KR101570321B1 (en) | 2015-06-19 | 2015-11-18 | 충남대학교산학협력단 | Passive Cavitator System of the Supercavitating Underwater Vehicle |
KR101570322B1 (en) | 2015-06-19 | 2015-11-18 | 충남대학교산학협력단 | Active Cavitator System of the Supercavitating Underwater Vehicle |
PL3899412T3 (en) | 2018-12-19 | 2024-11-18 | Bae Systems Plc | Munitions and projectiles |
US12173995B2 (en) * | 2018-12-19 | 2024-12-24 | Bae Systems Plc | Munitions and projectiles |
CN110017739B (en) * | 2019-04-09 | 2021-08-17 | 北方工业大学 | A new type of underwater bullet warhead and preparation method thereof |
CN112985188A (en) * | 2021-01-27 | 2021-06-18 | 西北工业大学 | Variable-structure cavitation device with water-entering load-reducing function |
CN113879451B (en) * | 2021-10-29 | 2023-10-31 | 大连理工大学 | A combined disc cavitation structure used for underwater navigation of the vehicle |
CN115626302B (en) * | 2022-10-27 | 2025-07-08 | 贵州航天天马机电科技有限公司 | Drag reducer for aircraft |
CN116412725B (en) * | 2023-02-20 | 2025-07-15 | 北京理工大学 | A missile high-speed water entry telescopic deformation load-reducing device |
Citations (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1371207A (en) * | 1917-09-04 | 1921-03-08 | Theodore S Wilkinson | Projectile |
US3041992A (en) * | 1960-05-10 | 1962-07-03 | United Aircraft Corp | Low drag submarine |
US3256816A (en) * | 1964-09-10 | 1966-06-21 | Ii James O Pilcher | Extending boom for sounding rockets |
US3282216A (en) * | 1962-01-30 | 1966-11-01 | Clifford T Calfee | Nose cone and tail structures for an air vehicle |
US3677179A (en) * | 1966-09-29 | 1972-07-18 | Lester A Potteiger | Telescoping ordnance device |
US3842741A (en) * | 1973-06-07 | 1974-10-22 | Us Army | Subprojectile launched from telescopic tubes |
US4687455A (en) * | 1985-10-22 | 1987-08-18 | Ron Sculatti | Flying model rocket and method of recovery |
US4770369A (en) * | 1986-06-16 | 1988-09-13 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Inflatable missle airframe surfaces |
US5464172A (en) * | 1994-05-26 | 1995-11-07 | Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. | Deployable mass and sensor for improved missile control |
US5494239A (en) * | 1994-08-02 | 1996-02-27 | Loral Vought Systems Corporation | Expandable ogive |
US6388184B1 (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2002-05-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Deployable nose for an underwater vehicle |
US6739266B1 (en) * | 2003-09-15 | 2004-05-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | High-speed supercavitating underwater vehicle |
US7779759B2 (en) * | 2008-11-21 | 2010-08-24 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Supercavitating water-entry projectile |
-
2008
- 2008-04-14 US US12/102,784 patent/US7874251B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1371207A (en) * | 1917-09-04 | 1921-03-08 | Theodore S Wilkinson | Projectile |
US3041992A (en) * | 1960-05-10 | 1962-07-03 | United Aircraft Corp | Low drag submarine |
US3282216A (en) * | 1962-01-30 | 1966-11-01 | Clifford T Calfee | Nose cone and tail structures for an air vehicle |
US3256816A (en) * | 1964-09-10 | 1966-06-21 | Ii James O Pilcher | Extending boom for sounding rockets |
US3677179A (en) * | 1966-09-29 | 1972-07-18 | Lester A Potteiger | Telescoping ordnance device |
US3842741A (en) * | 1973-06-07 | 1974-10-22 | Us Army | Subprojectile launched from telescopic tubes |
US4687455A (en) * | 1985-10-22 | 1987-08-18 | Ron Sculatti | Flying model rocket and method of recovery |
US4770369A (en) * | 1986-06-16 | 1988-09-13 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Inflatable missle airframe surfaces |
US5464172A (en) * | 1994-05-26 | 1995-11-07 | Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. | Deployable mass and sensor for improved missile control |
US5494239A (en) * | 1994-08-02 | 1996-02-27 | Loral Vought Systems Corporation | Expandable ogive |
US6388184B1 (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2002-05-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Deployable nose for an underwater vehicle |
US6739266B1 (en) * | 2003-09-15 | 2004-05-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | High-speed supercavitating underwater vehicle |
US7779759B2 (en) * | 2008-11-21 | 2010-08-24 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Supercavitating water-entry projectile |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7874251B1 (en) | 2011-01-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7874251B1 (en) | Cavity-running projectile having a telescoping nose | |
US7836827B2 (en) | Method of operating a supercavitating projectile based on time constraints | |
US8146501B1 (en) | Supercavitating projectile having a morphable nose | |
US7966936B1 (en) | Telescoping cavitator | |
US8151710B2 (en) | Surface ship, deck-launched anti-torpedo projectile | |
US7775480B2 (en) | Flying object for transonic or supersonic velocities | |
US7690309B1 (en) | Supercavitating vehicle control | |
CN112444165B (en) | Underwater supercavitation navigation body with hollow appearance characteristics | |
KR101570321B1 (en) | Passive Cavitator System of the Supercavitating Underwater Vehicle | |
KR101570322B1 (en) | Active Cavitator System of the Supercavitating Underwater Vehicle | |
CN102954733B (en) | For the sagging division ala type torch of projectile body hydrodynamic force control | |
US7347146B1 (en) | Supercavitating projectile with propulsion and ventilation jet | |
US20110192663A1 (en) | WIG Vehicle Excluding Horizontal Stabilizer | |
US20170115103A1 (en) | Full-caliber, spin-stabilized guided projectile with long range | |
CN108180792A (en) | Supercavitating Projectile about granule surface contral drag reduction | |
Hutt et al. | Forward facing spike effects on bodies of different cross section in supersonic flow | |
Fu et al. | Experimental investigation of the characteristics of an artificial cavity during the water-exit of a slender body | |
US8151711B1 (en) | Supercavitating projectile with reduced-drag control surfaces | |
US8082847B1 (en) | Cavity-enhancing features and methods for a cavity-running projectile | |
JP2008237167A (en) | Fishing sinker | |
Rao et al. | Forebody vortex management for yaw control at high angles of attack | |
Stephen et al. | Comparison articulating nosecones and canards for missile flight control under Mach 2 conditions | |
Kobayashi et al. | Experimental study on aerodynamic characteristics of telescopic aerospikes with multiple disks | |
US3869101A (en) | Infantry missile for combat against ground targets | |
WO2008105930A2 (en) | Supercavitation weapons launcher |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, MARYLAND Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FU, JYUN-HORNG;REEL/FRAME:020974/0806 Effective date: 20080508 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20190125 |