[go: up one dir, main page]

US20100276140A1 - Method for Viscous Hydrocarbon Production Incorporating Steam and Solvent Cycling - Google Patents

Method for Viscous Hydrocarbon Production Incorporating Steam and Solvent Cycling Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100276140A1
US20100276140A1 US12/768,806 US76880610A US2010276140A1 US 20100276140 A1 US20100276140 A1 US 20100276140A1 US 76880610 A US76880610 A US 76880610A US 2010276140 A1 US2010276140 A1 US 2010276140A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
solvent
steam
flow rate
injection
heavy
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/768,806
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Neil Edmunds
Jeff Peterson
Behdad Moini
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Laricina Energy Ltd
Original Assignee
Laricina Energy Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Laricina Energy Ltd filed Critical Laricina Energy Ltd
Priority to US12/768,806 priority Critical patent/US20100276140A1/en
Assigned to LARICINA ENERGY LTD. reassignment LARICINA ENERGY LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EDMUNDS, NEIL, MOINI, BEHDAD, PETERSON, JEFF
Publication of US20100276140A1 publication Critical patent/US20100276140A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/16—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
    • E21B43/24—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection
    • E21B43/2406—Steam assisted gravity drainage [SAGD]
    • E21B43/2408—SAGD in combination with other methods

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the production of hydrocarbons, in particular viscous hydrocarbons, from petroleum deposits. More specifically, the invention relates to an improved method for producing hydrocarbons from formations, such as “oil sands”, incorporating cyclic applications of steam and solvent.
  • Oil sand deposits are found predominantly in the Middle East, Venezuela, and Western Canada.
  • the Canadian bitumen deposits being the largest in the world, are estimated to contain between 1.6 and 2.5 trillion barrels of oil, so the potential economic benefit of this invention carries significance within this resource class.
  • the term “oil sands” refers to large subterranean land forms composed of reservoir rock, water and heavy oil and/or bitumen.
  • Bitumen is a heavy, black oil which, due to its high viscosity, cannot readily be pumped from the ground like other crude oils. Therefore, alternate processing techniques must be used to extract the bitumen deposits from the oil sands, which remain a subject of active development in the field of practice.
  • the basic principle of known extraction processes is to lower the viscosity of the bitumen by applying heat, injecting chemical solvents, or a combination thereof, to a deposit layer, thereby promoting flow of the material throughout the treated reservoir area, in order to allow for recovery of bitumen from that layer.
  • SAGD Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage
  • a SAGD process is described, for example, in Canadian patent number 1,304,287.
  • steam is injected into a target reservoir through a horizontal injection well to heat heavy crude oil within a reservoir.
  • the range of temperatures, and corresponding viscosities, required to achieve an economic flow rate is dependent on the permeability of the reservoir in question.
  • SAGD as with most recovery strategies, is focused on increasing bitumen temperature within a limited region around a steam injection well.
  • the reduced-viscosity oil is then allowed to flow by gravity drainage to an underlying point of the reservoir and to be collected by a horizontal production well.
  • the heavy oil/bitumen is then brought to the surface for further processing.
  • Various pumping equipment and/or systems may be used in association with the production well.
  • SAGD processes have several associated inefficiencies. Firstly, the process is very energy intensive, requiring a great amount of energy for heating the volumes of water to generate the steam used for the heat transfer process.
  • the amount of steam required is usually dictated by the need to maintain a certain pressure in the reservoir; this usually translates into a higher temperature than is optimally needed to mobilize the bitumen.
  • the injected steam condenses into water, which mixes with the mobilized bitumen and often leads to additional inefficiencies.
  • the water must be recycled through the boilers, requiring costly de-oiling and softening processes.
  • the original or initial separation of the bitumen and water requires further processing and costs associated with such procedures.
  • the energy input to the deposit is often transferred to neighbouring geological structures and lost by way of conduction.
  • the process becomes considerably energy intensive in order to achieve sufficient heating of the target formation.
  • SAGD processes are typically only commercially viable for reservoirs having a minimum volume and concentration of hydrocarbons.
  • Dilution is another technique that has been used for the extraction of bitumen from oil sand or heavy oil deposits.
  • Such methods often referred to as vapour extraction methods, or VAPEX, involve a dilution process wherein solvents, such as light alkanes or other relatively light hydrocarbons, are injected into a deposit to dilute the heavy oil or bitumen.
  • solvents such as light alkanes or other relatively light hydrocarbons
  • This technique also reduces the viscosity of the heavy hydrocarbon component, thereby facilitating recovery of the bitumen-solvent mixture that is mobilized throughout the reservoir.
  • the injected solvent is produced along with bitumen material and some solvent can be recovered by further processing.
  • VAPEX methods avoid the costs associated with SAGD methods, the production rate of solvent based methods has been found to be less than steam based processes.
  • VAPEX method also requires processing facilities for the extraction of the injected solvent.
  • VAPEX methods tend to accumulate material quantities of liquid solvent within the depleted part of the reservoir. Such solvents cannot be recovered until the end of the process thereby representing an economically significant cost for the solvent inventory.
  • a combination of SAGD and VAPEX methods has also been proposed in order to combine the benefits of both while mitigating the drawbacks associated therewith.
  • a solvent aided, or solvent assisted process, or SAP this method involves the injection of both steam and a low molecular weight hydrocarbon into the formation.
  • Gupta et al. J. Can. Pet. Tech., 2007, 46(9), pp. 57-61) teach a SAP method, which comprises a SAGD process wherein a solvent is simultaneously injected into the formation with the steam.
  • a SAP process has been found to improve the economics of SAGD methods.
  • the SAVES method involves a sequence of solvent/steam injections to recover bitumen.
  • the SAVES method comprises three phases. In the first phase, steam and a heavy solvent (C5+) are injected into a formation. In the second phase, the steam and heavy solvent flow rates are gradually reduced while a light solvent (C1-C4) is introduced with a gradually increasing flow rate. In the third phase, injection of the steam and heavy solvent is stopped and the injection of the light solvent continues at a higher rate. After the third phase, a “blow down” procedures is used to recover the injected solvents.
  • Zhao et al. (J. Can. Pet. Tech., 2005, 44(9), pp. 37-43) teach a hydrocarbon production method involving alternating steam and solvent injection, referred to as the steam alternating solvent (SAS) process.
  • SAS steam alternating solvent
  • steam and solvent are injected in an alternating manner without any co-injection of the two.
  • the invention provides an improved SAGD method for extracting hydrocarbons from a reservoir containing hydrocarbons, wherein the method comprises the cyclic injection of steam and heavy and light solvents.
  • the invention provides a method of producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean reservoir containing the hydrocarbons, the reservoir including at least one generally horizontal injection well and at least one generally horizontal production well, the production well being located vertically below the injection well and proximal thereto, the method comprising:
  • step (c) increasing the steam injection rate to above the rate of step (b), restarting the heavy solvent injection, and continuing the light solvent injection;
  • FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating the correlation between Canadian Athabasca heavy oil/bitumen viscosity and the temperature of the deposit.
  • FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the correlation between Athabasca bitumen viscosity and the volume of solvent added to the deposit.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the injection profiles of the steam and solvent components used in the present invention.
  • FIGS. 4 to 6 illustrate a comparison of performance efficiencies of the method of the invention and a typical SAGD method.
  • reservoir As used herein, the terms “reservoir”, “formation”, “deposit”, are synonymous and refer to generally subterranean reservoirs containing hydrocarbons. As discussed further below, such hydrocarbons may comprise bitumen and bitumen like materials.
  • Oil sands refers to deposits containing heavy hydrocarbon components such as bitumen or “heavy oil”, wherein such hydrocarbons are intermixed with sand.
  • oil sands it will be understood by persons skilled in the art that the invention may also be applicable to other types reservoirs containing bitumen or heavy oil, or other such hydrocarbon materials (i.e. heavy crude oil).
  • oil sands and bitumen are used for the purposes of the following description and will be understood to refer generally to any of the above mentioned hydrocarbon reservoirs and materials. The choice of such terms serves to facilitate the description of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention in any way.
  • solvent refers to one or more hydrocarbon solvents used in hydrocarbon recovery methods as known in the art.
  • the solvents of the invention are hydrocarbons comprising chain lengths of C2 to C10.
  • suitable solvents for bitumen extraction processes are known in the art, and can include alkanes, naphtha, CO 2 and combinations thereof.
  • the solvent may comprise a mixture of one or more hydrocarbon components.
  • the terms “light solvent” or “light hydrocarbon” will be understood as comprising one or more alkane components preferably having a length of C2 to C4, and more preferably C3 (i.e. propane).
  • the terms “heavy solvent” or “heavy hydrocarbon” as used herein will be understood as comprising one or more alkane components preferably having a length of at least C4, and more preferably at least C5 (i.e. pentane).
  • the heavy and light solvents can comprise mixtures of solvents having a desired average chain length.
  • the heavy solvent may comprise a mixture of hydrocarbons, each preferably having a length greater than C4 and wherein the mixture has an average chain length of approximately C5.
  • at least 1 ⁇ 3 v/v of the heavy solvent mixture is comprised of pentane (C5) and/or hexane (C6).
  • the light solvent may comprise a mixture of hydrocarbons, each preferably having a length less than C4 and wherein the mixture has an average chain length of approximately C3.
  • at least 1 ⁇ 2 v/v of the light solvent mixture is comprised of propane (C3).
  • the light solvent contains less than about 25 mole % of methane (C1) and ethane (C2).
  • the choice of solvents depends on the reservoir or anticipated operating pressure. The heavy solvent should condense at a temperature that is less than that for steam but higher than the average of steam temperature and initial reservoir temperature. Similarly the light solvent, at operating pressure, should condense at a temperature which is less than the average between steam and initial temperatures. The choice of an appropriate solvent for use in the invention will, therefore, be apparent to persons skilled in the art in view of the teaching provided herein.
  • natural gas liquids or “NGL” will be understood as comprising alkane hydrocarbons generally having lengths of C2 to C6, and which are normally condensation products in the course of natural gas processing.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the effect of heat on bitumen viscosity.
  • the curves for varying oil density, or API gravity show a maximum slope at the lower temperatures, indicating that small initial in-situ formation temperature increases produce the largest reductions in oil viscosity per degree of temperature rise.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates the effect of solvent injection on bitumen viscosity. The graph shows the correlation of the mole fraction of solvent 14 , the solvent in this example being hexane, with the bitumen viscosity 11 .
  • the top dotted curve 4 for solvent at 10° C. demonstrates that as the mole fraction of hexane 12 in a hexane/bitumen solution increases, the viscosity 11 of the mixture can be reduced from millions of centipoises a viscosity of less than 10 centipoise.
  • pure unheated solvent applications have proven much more difficult to execute in practice, with at least two uneconomic field trials attempted.
  • the present invention provides an improved method for recovering hydrocarbons and, more particularly, viscous hydrocarbons from subterranean deposits.
  • the invention provides a method for recovering bitumen from oil sands and the like, which incorporates a combination of SAGD and solvent techniques.
  • the invention requires at least one injection well and at least one production well. Both the injection and production wells are provided in a reservoir containing hydrocarbons to be produced (or extracted). The wells are arranged generally horizontally as in a typical SAGD process, wherein the injection wells are positioned vertically above the production wells.
  • steam and/or one or more solvents are injected into the reservoir, which results in mobilization of the bitumen material within the reservoir.
  • the mobilization of bitumen is caused by a reduction in its viscosity due to the heating effect of the injected steam and/or the diluting effect of the injected solvent. In either case, the mobilized bitumen is allowed to travel downward due to gravity and is collected in the lower production well. The bitumen entering the production well is then transported, using pumps and other associated equipment known in the art, to the surface for subsequent processing.
  • the injection and production wells are first positioned in the same manner as with known SAGD processes.
  • the arrangement and positioning of the wells is known in the art and described, for example in Canadian patent number 1,304,287.
  • the well spacing may be reduced by half as compared with typical SAGD processes due to the efficiency of the present method. It will be understood that this is an advantage of the invention and not a restriction.
  • the method can be applied to a field already prepared for a SAGD process without altering the well positioning. Once the wells are positioned and the initial start-up of the SAGD process has been effected, the method of the invention can then be commenced.
  • the method can be divided into six main phases or stages, I to VI, each taking place sequentially over a period of time.
  • the switching of one phase to another is preferably based on a recovery factor, quantified as the percentage of oil in place (OIP) that has been recovered.
  • OIP oil in place
  • the first phase of the method begins with the co-injection of steam and a heavy (preferably C5 or greater) solvent into the reservoir.
  • the steam injection rate is preferably the same as that normally associated with SAGD processes. As known in the art, the steam injection rate will vary according to various physical characteristics of the reservoir and other such criteria. The present invention is not limited to any particular rate of steam injection.
  • the steam flow rate for Phase I will be referred to herein as the maximum steam flow rate, SFmax, and will be understood to mean a mass flow rate. It will be chosen or determined so as to result in or maintain the desired or necessary pressure in the reservoir. Similarly, all flow rates of solvents will also be understood to mean mass flow rates.
  • the preferred, but not exclusive, solvent for Phase I is pentane (C5) or a heavier hydrocarbon, or some combination thereof.
  • the flow rate of the heavy solvent is about 0-20%, and preferably about 4-20%, and more preferably 8-20% of SFmax. Preferably, no other solvent is injected during this phase.
  • the use of such heavy solvent e.g. pentane or another “heavy” hydrocarbon as defined herein
  • One factor for considering the use of the heavy solvent in Phase I is the relative value of such solvent as compared to the bitumen product. For example, it may be found that the cost of using the heavy solvent is outweighed by the economic benefit of the recovered bitumen.
  • a further factor that determines the amount of heavy solvent used in Phase I is the rate of recovery of the heavy solvent. Such recovery will be controlled, inter alia, by the geological properties of the deposit.
  • the steam and heavy solvent co-injection of Phase I is continued until about 25-30% of the OIP has been recovered.
  • the steam injection rate is reduced to about 8-20%, and preferably 15-20%, of SFmax.
  • the injection of heavy solvent is stopped and the injection of a light solvent (i.e. C2 to C4) is commenced.
  • the light solvent is propane (C3).
  • the flow rate of the light solvent is about 4-8% of SFmax.
  • Phase II is preferably continued until about 40-45% of the OIP is recovered.
  • Phase III the steam flow rate is increased slightly to about 20-25% of SFmax and both light and heavy solvents are injected.
  • the flow rate of the heavy solvent is about 0-10%, and preferably about 2-10%, of SFmax and the flow rate of the light solvent is preferably about 3-6% of SFmax.
  • the flow rate of the light solvent is preferably slightly reduced as compared to Phase II.
  • Phase III may therefore be characterized as a spike in the heavy solvent injection rate.
  • the amount of the heavy solvent e.g. pentane
  • the amount of the heavy solvent will depend on certain cost and recovery factors. Thus, in some cases, it may be found more economically efficient to avoid using any heavy solvent in Phase III.
  • Phase III is preferably continued until about 56-66%, and preferably 58-64%, of the OIP is recovered.
  • Phase IV the steam flow rate is increased slightly from that of Phase III to about 30-35% of SFmax. The injection of both heavy and light solvents is stopped. Thus, for Phase IV, only steam is injected into the reservoir and, as such, this phase may be characterized as a spike in the steam injection rate.
  • Phase IV is preferably continued until about 66-72% of the OIP is recovered.
  • Phase V steam injection is reduced to about 15-20% of SFmax. No injection of heavy solvent is made; however, light solvent injection is recommenced at a flow rate of about 2-5% of SF max. This phase may therefore be characterized as a spike in light solvent injection.
  • Phase V is preferably continued until about 75-80% of the OIP is recovered.
  • Phase VI comprises a blow out phase wherein residual solvent is recovered, or scavenged, along with a portion of the bitumen in the reservoir. During this phase, no steam or the above mentioned solvents are injected into the reservoir.
  • the solvent recovery is effected by various methods known in the art such as injection of methane and/or by depressurizing the reservoir.
  • the preferred method of scavenging residual solvent is to inject a non-condensible gas such as methane, nitrogen, or CO 2 into one or both of the injection and production wells of wells arranged in alternating pairs, and to produce the same volume from intervening pairs of wells. It will be understood that the invention is not limited to any particular method of solvent recovery. It will also be understood that Phase VI may be eliminated in cases where solvent recovery or further bitumen production is not economically viable or sustainable.
  • the final phase may be continued for any required amount of time until, for example, about 85% of the OIP is recovered.
  • the duration of this phase would be primarily based on the need to scavenge residual solvent and other economic considerations. For example, if the efficiency of production drops below a certain threshold, Phase VI can be terminated.
  • each phase may be conducted up till a desired recovery threshold of the Oil in Place (OIP) is reached.
  • OIP Oil in Place
  • the time period of each stage may be measured by years.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the flow rates of the respective steam, heavy solvent and light solvent injection streams used in one of the tests as each of the above phases was carried out. As can be seen, the flow rate conditions and timing of the phases were similar to that described above in Table 1.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a comparison between extraction of a reservoir using a typical SAGD process and a process according to the present invention, namely a solvent cycle SAGD (or SC-SAGD).
  • a solvent cycle SAGD or SC-SAGD
  • the present invention provides a 30% improvement in bitumen extraction efficiency.
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate the performance efficiency of the present invention (SC-SAGD) as compared to typical SAGD methods. As shown, the method of the present invention provides a higher oil recovery while requiring a much reduced steam to oil ratio (SOR).
  • SOR steam to oil ratio
  • the “heavy” and “light” solvents used in the present method may be either single types of hydrocarbons or may comprise a mixture of hydrocarbons. In the typical scenario, the solvents will comprise such a mixture and, preferably, with a greater proportion being made up of a desired weight of solvent.
  • a natural gas condensate, or natural gas liquid (NGL) may be used, consisting of preferably more than 1 ⁇ 3 (v/v) of pentanes plus hexanes.
  • NGL natural gas liquid
  • the liquid volume of the NGL used for this purpose would be the same as indicated above with respect to pentane by itself.
  • butane may be substituted for pentane as the heavy solvent.
  • the purity of the solvent is not critical for the method of the invention; however, when recycling propane, the presence of methane or other light gases should preferably be limited to less than about 25% mole fraction. As such, the operating costs associated with solvent refining are mitigated by the present invention.
  • the method of the invention provides an improved and more efficient process for recovering bitumen than a SAGD process alone.
  • the invention is adapted to be used for an existing SAGD well arrangement, in new fields, the spacing of wells for the purpose of the invention can be reduced by 50%, thereby reducing the facility and operating costs associated with the recovery process.
  • the invention reduces by as much as 50% the amount of heat consumption normally associated with SAGD methods.
  • the solvent scavenging process can also be brought forward in time, which will reduce the cost associated with the solvent inventory during recovery.
  • the invention is able to realize a major reduction in the steam to oil ratio (SOR) and cumulative steam to oil ratio (CSOR) as compared a SAGD process alone.
  • SOR steam to oil ratio
  • CSOR cumulative steam to oil ratio

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
US12/768,806 2009-04-29 2010-04-28 Method for Viscous Hydrocarbon Production Incorporating Steam and Solvent Cycling Abandoned US20100276140A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/768,806 US20100276140A1 (en) 2009-04-29 2010-04-28 Method for Viscous Hydrocarbon Production Incorporating Steam and Solvent Cycling

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17391109P 2009-04-29 2009-04-29
US12/768,806 US20100276140A1 (en) 2009-04-29 2010-04-28 Method for Viscous Hydrocarbon Production Incorporating Steam and Solvent Cycling

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100276140A1 true US20100276140A1 (en) 2010-11-04

Family

ID=43029173

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/768,806 Abandoned US20100276140A1 (en) 2009-04-29 2010-04-28 Method for Viscous Hydrocarbon Production Incorporating Steam and Solvent Cycling

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20100276140A1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2701437C (fr)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080122286A1 (en) * 2006-11-22 2008-05-29 Osum Oil Sands Corp. Recovery of bitumen by hydraulic excavation
US20120085537A1 (en) * 2010-09-15 2012-04-12 Harris Corporation Heavy oil recovery using sf6 and rf heating
US8287050B2 (en) 2005-07-18 2012-10-16 Osum Oil Sands Corp. Method of increasing reservoir permeability
US20130105147A1 (en) * 2011-10-28 2013-05-02 George R. Scott Recovery From A Hydrocarbon Reservoir
US20140034305A1 (en) * 2011-04-27 2014-02-06 Matthew A. Dawson Method of Enhancing the Effectiveness of a Cyclic Solvent Injection Process to Recover Hydrocarbons
WO2014085103A1 (fr) * 2012-11-29 2014-06-05 Conocophillips Company Procédé de récupération d'hydrocarbures comportant des étapes de vapeur et de solvant
US8770289B2 (en) 2011-12-16 2014-07-08 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method and system for lifting fluids from a reservoir
US20140251608A1 (en) * 2013-03-05 2014-09-11 Cenovus Energy Inc. Single vertical or inclined well thermal recovery process
WO2015000066A1 (fr) * 2013-07-05 2015-01-08 Nexen Energy Ulc Addition de solvant pour améliorer le rendement de production d'hydrocarbure
US20150083413A1 (en) * 2013-09-20 2015-03-26 Conocophillips Company Reducing solvent retention in es-sagd
WO2016004501A1 (fr) * 2014-07-07 2016-01-14 Nexen Energy Ulc Adjonction de solvant pour améliorer l'efficacité de la production d'hydrocarbures
US20160177691A1 (en) * 2014-12-18 2016-06-23 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Method for upgrading in situ heavy oil
US9534483B2 (en) 2013-09-09 2017-01-03 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir
US9902405B2 (en) 2013-01-09 2018-02-27 Tractivepower Corporation Rail cars for transporting heavy hydrocarbons
US10000998B2 (en) 2013-12-19 2018-06-19 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir
US20180266222A1 (en) * 2017-03-17 2018-09-20 Conocophillips Company System and method for accelerated solvent recovery
US10487636B2 (en) 2017-07-27 2019-11-26 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Enhanced methods for recovering viscous hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation as a follow-up to thermal recovery processes
US11002123B2 (en) 2017-08-31 2021-05-11 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Thermal recovery methods for recovering viscous hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation
US11142681B2 (en) 2017-06-29 2021-10-12 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Chasing solvent for enhanced recovery processes
US11261725B2 (en) 2017-10-24 2022-03-01 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Systems and methods for estimating and controlling liquid level using periodic shut-ins
US20220136376A1 (en) * 2020-11-04 2022-05-05 Cenovus Energy Inc. Hydrocarbon-production methods employing multiple solvent processes across a well pad
US20230147327A1 (en) * 2021-11-05 2023-05-11 Conocophillips Company Optimizing steam and solvent injection timing in oil production
US12011696B1 (en) * 2023-07-31 2024-06-18 Delfos Capital Llc Hot crude gravity drainage (HCGD) for heavy and extra-heavy enhanced oil recovery (EOR)

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4513819A (en) * 1984-02-27 1985-04-30 Mobil Oil Corporation Cyclic solvent assisted steam injection process for recovery of viscous oil
US4519454A (en) * 1981-10-01 1985-05-28 Mobil Oil Corporation Combined thermal and solvent stimulation
US4573819A (en) * 1982-06-02 1986-03-04 Montblanc-Simplo Gmbh System for supplying ink for writing instruments
US6230814B1 (en) * 1999-10-14 2001-05-15 Alberta Oil Sands Technology And Research Authority Process for enhancing hydrocarbon mobility using a steam additive
US6591908B2 (en) * 2001-08-22 2003-07-15 Alberta Science And Research Authority Hydrocarbon production process with decreasing steam and/or water/solvent ratio
US6662872B2 (en) * 2000-11-10 2003-12-16 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Combined steam and vapor extraction process (SAVEX) for in situ bitumen and heavy oil production
US6708759B2 (en) * 2001-04-04 2004-03-23 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Liquid addition to steam for enhancing recovery of cyclic steam stimulation or LASER-CSS
US20050211434A1 (en) * 2004-03-24 2005-09-29 Gates Ian D Process for in situ recovery of bitumen and heavy oil
US20080017372A1 (en) * 2006-07-21 2008-01-24 Paramount Resources Ltd. In situ process to recover heavy oil and bitumen

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4519454A (en) * 1981-10-01 1985-05-28 Mobil Oil Corporation Combined thermal and solvent stimulation
US4573819A (en) * 1982-06-02 1986-03-04 Montblanc-Simplo Gmbh System for supplying ink for writing instruments
US4513819A (en) * 1984-02-27 1985-04-30 Mobil Oil Corporation Cyclic solvent assisted steam injection process for recovery of viscous oil
US6230814B1 (en) * 1999-10-14 2001-05-15 Alberta Oil Sands Technology And Research Authority Process for enhancing hydrocarbon mobility using a steam additive
US6662872B2 (en) * 2000-11-10 2003-12-16 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Combined steam and vapor extraction process (SAVEX) for in situ bitumen and heavy oil production
US6708759B2 (en) * 2001-04-04 2004-03-23 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Liquid addition to steam for enhancing recovery of cyclic steam stimulation or LASER-CSS
US6591908B2 (en) * 2001-08-22 2003-07-15 Alberta Science And Research Authority Hydrocarbon production process with decreasing steam and/or water/solvent ratio
US20050211434A1 (en) * 2004-03-24 2005-09-29 Gates Ian D Process for in situ recovery of bitumen and heavy oil
US7464756B2 (en) * 2004-03-24 2008-12-16 Exxon Mobil Upstream Research Company Process for in situ recovery of bitumen and heavy oil
US20080017372A1 (en) * 2006-07-21 2008-01-24 Paramount Resources Ltd. In situ process to recover heavy oil and bitumen

Cited By (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8287050B2 (en) 2005-07-18 2012-10-16 Osum Oil Sands Corp. Method of increasing reservoir permeability
US8313152B2 (en) 2006-11-22 2012-11-20 Osum Oil Sands Corp. Recovery of bitumen by hydraulic excavation
US20080122286A1 (en) * 2006-11-22 2008-05-29 Osum Oil Sands Corp. Recovery of bitumen by hydraulic excavation
US8960286B2 (en) * 2010-09-15 2015-02-24 Conocophilips Company Heavy oil recovery using SF6 and RF heating
US20120085537A1 (en) * 2010-09-15 2012-04-12 Harris Corporation Heavy oil recovery using sf6 and rf heating
US20140034305A1 (en) * 2011-04-27 2014-02-06 Matthew A. Dawson Method of Enhancing the Effectiveness of a Cyclic Solvent Injection Process to Recover Hydrocarbons
US20130105147A1 (en) * 2011-10-28 2013-05-02 George R. Scott Recovery From A Hydrocarbon Reservoir
US8770289B2 (en) 2011-12-16 2014-07-08 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method and system for lifting fluids from a reservoir
WO2014085103A1 (fr) * 2012-11-29 2014-06-05 Conocophillips Company Procédé de récupération d'hydrocarbures comportant des étapes de vapeur et de solvant
US12157855B2 (en) * 2012-11-29 2024-12-03 Conocophillips Company Hydrocarbon recovery with steam and solvent stages
US20220315828A1 (en) * 2012-11-29 2022-10-06 Conocophillips Company Hydrocarbon recovery with steam and solvent stages
US11370958B2 (en) 2012-11-29 2022-06-28 Conocophillips Company Hydrocarbon recovery with steam and solvent stages
US9902405B2 (en) 2013-01-09 2018-02-27 Tractivepower Corporation Rail cars for transporting heavy hydrocarbons
US20140251608A1 (en) * 2013-03-05 2014-09-11 Cenovus Energy Inc. Single vertical or inclined well thermal recovery process
WO2015000066A1 (fr) * 2013-07-05 2015-01-08 Nexen Energy Ulc Addition de solvant pour améliorer le rendement de production d'hydrocarbure
US9970283B2 (en) 2013-09-09 2018-05-15 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir
US9970282B2 (en) 2013-09-09 2018-05-15 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir
US9534483B2 (en) 2013-09-09 2017-01-03 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir
US20150083413A1 (en) * 2013-09-20 2015-03-26 Conocophillips Company Reducing solvent retention in es-sagd
US10633957B2 (en) * 2013-09-20 2020-04-28 Conocophillips Company Reducing solvent retention in ES-SAGD
US10000998B2 (en) 2013-12-19 2018-06-19 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir
WO2016004501A1 (fr) * 2014-07-07 2016-01-14 Nexen Energy Ulc Adjonction de solvant pour améliorer l'efficacité de la production d'hydrocarbures
US9739125B2 (en) * 2014-12-18 2017-08-22 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Method for upgrading in situ heavy oil
US20160177691A1 (en) * 2014-12-18 2016-06-23 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Method for upgrading in situ heavy oil
US10584568B2 (en) * 2017-03-17 2020-03-10 Conocophillips Company System and method for accelerated solvent recovery
US20180266222A1 (en) * 2017-03-17 2018-09-20 Conocophillips Company System and method for accelerated solvent recovery
US11142681B2 (en) 2017-06-29 2021-10-12 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Chasing solvent for enhanced recovery processes
US10487636B2 (en) 2017-07-27 2019-11-26 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Enhanced methods for recovering viscous hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation as a follow-up to thermal recovery processes
US11002123B2 (en) 2017-08-31 2021-05-11 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Thermal recovery methods for recovering viscous hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation
US11261725B2 (en) 2017-10-24 2022-03-01 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Systems and methods for estimating and controlling liquid level using periodic shut-ins
US11927084B2 (en) * 2020-11-04 2024-03-12 Cenovus Energy Inc. Hydrocarbon-production methods employing multiple solvent processes across a well pad
US20220136376A1 (en) * 2020-11-04 2022-05-05 Cenovus Energy Inc. Hydrocarbon-production methods employing multiple solvent processes across a well pad
US20230147327A1 (en) * 2021-11-05 2023-05-11 Conocophillips Company Optimizing steam and solvent injection timing in oil production
US12071850B2 (en) * 2021-11-05 2024-08-27 Conocophillips Company Optimizing steam and solvent injection timing in oil production
US12011696B1 (en) * 2023-07-31 2024-06-18 Delfos Capital Llc Hot crude gravity drainage (HCGD) for heavy and extra-heavy enhanced oil recovery (EOR)
US20250041812A1 (en) * 2023-07-31 2025-02-06 Delfos Capital Llc Hot crude gravity drainage (hcgd) for heavy and extra-heavy enhanced oil recovery (eor)
US12251671B2 (en) * 2023-07-31 2025-03-18 Delfos Capital Llc Hot crude gravity drainage (HCGD) for heavy and extra-heavy enhanced oil recovery (EOR)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2701437A1 (fr) 2010-10-29
CA2701437C (fr) 2014-12-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2701437C (fr) Methode de production d'hydrocarbures visqueux comprenant l'injection cyclique de vapeur et de solvant
US7464756B2 (en) Process for in situ recovery of bitumen and heavy oil
CA2645703E (fr) Procedes de recuperation assistee par chauffage passif
CA2766849C (fr) Recuperation d'un reservoir d'hydrocarbures utilisant un melange de vapeur et un solvant volatil
US9970282B2 (en) Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir
US8770289B2 (en) Method and system for lifting fluids from a reservoir
US10487636B2 (en) Enhanced methods for recovering viscous hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation as a follow-up to thermal recovery processes
US20100089573A1 (en) Method for recovering heavy/viscous oils from a subterranean formation
US20190032460A1 (en) Method of solvent recovery from a solvent based heavy oil extraction process
US11002123B2 (en) Thermal recovery methods for recovering viscous hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation
US20150107834A1 (en) Method for producing heavy oil
US20120168158A1 (en) Enhanced hydrocarbon recovery from low mobility reservoirs
WO2015158371A1 (fr) Procédé de récupération d'hydrocarbures lourds à partir d'une formation appauvrie
US20190017361A1 (en) Solvents and ncg-co-injection with tapered pressure
CA2910486C (fr) Procede de recuperation d'energie thermique
CA3003532C (fr) Co-injection de solvants et de gaz non compressibles a pression reduite
CA3036171C (fr) Optimisation de procedes de solvants cycliques
US11927084B2 (en) Hydrocarbon-production methods employing multiple solvent processes across a well pad
Foroozanfar Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery By Using Thermal and Non-Thermal Methods
WO2016004501A1 (fr) Adjonction de solvant pour améliorer l'efficacité de la production d'hydrocarbures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: LARICINA ENERGY LTD., CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:EDMUNDS, NEIL;PETERSON, JEFF;MOINI, BEHDAD;REEL/FRAME:025085/0365

Effective date: 20090511

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION