US20040033804A1 - Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040033804A1 US20040033804A1 US10/219,231 US21923102A US2004033804A1 US 20040033804 A1 US20040033804 A1 US 20040033804A1 US 21923102 A US21923102 A US 21923102A US 2004033804 A1 US2004033804 A1 US 2004033804A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- power
- signal
- channels
- neighboring cells
- channel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 51
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000010267 cellular communication Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010295 mobile communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/24—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters
- H04W36/30—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data
- H04W36/302—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data due to low signal strength
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
- H04W24/10—Scheduling measurement reports ; Arrangements for measurement reports
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W48/00—Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
- H04W48/16—Discovering, processing access restriction or access information
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to the scanning of neighboring cells by a wireless communication device in a cellular communication network and, more particularly, to reducing scanning times by eliminating from consideration channels where the measured power is substantially comprised of adjacent channel power.
- Mobile subscribers use wireless communication devices to communicate over a cellular wireless communication network by transmitting and receiving wireless signals between the wireless communication devices and one or more base stations, located at varying distances proximate to the various mobile subscribers.
- a wireless communication device will periodically scan for neighboring cells and corresponding base stations. When appropriate, a communication device will initiate a reselection or a handover.
- a handover occurs when a new serving base station is selected, while the wireless communication device is in dedicated mode (e.g. when a call is in progress).
- a reselection occurs when a new serving base station is selected, while the wireless communication device is in idle mode.
- a similar selection process will also take place when power is initially applied to the wireless communication device, and the wireless communication device is initially locating itself within the network.
- Medium-sized band GSM systems corresponding to the Global System for Mobile Communications, generally provide 200 kHz carrier separation between channels.
- spilled power can occur in several sequentially adjacent channels at various attenuation levels.
- the GSM specification defines a reference interference level for several sequentially adjacent channels, which corresponds to a detectability level and the allowable amounts of adjacent channel power.
- the GSM specification provides a reference interference level that is less than ⁇ 9 dB, relative to the power transmitted on the primary channel.
- the reference interference level For adjacent channels 400 kHz and 600 kHz away, the GSM specification requires that the reference interference level not exceed ⁇ 41 dB and ⁇ 49 dB, respectively.
- the GSM specification further provides a detection margin of 9 dB. This translates to a limit of spilled power in the amounts of ⁇ 18 dB in an immediately adjacent channel, and requires that the spilled power not exceed ⁇ 50 dB and ⁇ 58 dB for channels 400 kHz and 600 kHz away, respectively.
- the spilled power in an adjacent channel can have a power level, which is sufficiently strong to be observable by the wireless communication device. For example, if a primary signal was received by the wireless communication device with a signal strength of ⁇ 41 dB, the immediately adjacent channel might have a power level as seen by the wireless communication device, which is substantially comprised of spilled power, that has a power level of ⁇ 59 dB, and still be within the limits for spilled power allowed in the specification. Furthermore, a channel having a power level of ⁇ 59 dB is sufficiently strong, so as to be identified as a channel having a potentially detectable signal.
- the signal needs to have a signal strength greater than ⁇ 104 dBm, also known as the reference sensitivity level.
- spilled power can produce a channel power level of ⁇ 91 dB and ⁇ 99 dB in the adjacent channels 400 kHz and 600 kHz away, respectively, that is seen by the wireless communication device.
- ⁇ 91 dB and ⁇ 99 dB both of the channel power levels are similarly sufficiently strong to be identified as channels, which potentially have signals of interest.
- standard frequency planning will provide that nearby channels will not be used in the same geographical area, in order to minimize the effects of interfering spilled power from an adjacent channel.
- the system can still include the nearby channel in a list of defined neighboring cells that is transmitted by the serving cell, which is then used to monitor and search for neighboring cells.
- a wireless communication device can sometimes spend time and energy trying to acquire a signal on a nearby channel, where the power measured for the channel is substantially comprised of spilled power from an adjacent channel, and where there is little hope of acquiring a signal.
- a wireless device can sometimes make several attempts to acquire a signal before exceeding the limit on the allowed number of attempts and attempting to acquire the next channel in the list.
- the present invention provides a method of scanning for neighboring cells.
- the method includes measuring the channel power from the neighboring cells and sorting the channels based upon the power measurements. An attempt is then made to acquire or otherwise identify a signal from the channels of the neighboring cells in descending order of the sorted power measurements. When a signal from a channel is successfully acquired or otherwise identified, an amount of adjacent channel power is determined, which was produced as part of the signal from the channel successfully acquired or otherwise identified.
- the determined adjacent channel power is then compared to the measured power for any corresponding channels in the sorted list of channels. Any channel for which the measured power is substantially comprised of adjacent channel power is then removed from the group of sorted channels.
- attempting to acquire a signal from the channels of the neighboring cells includes searching for a signal being transmitted on a selected channel, and attempting to synchronize with the expected signal. In attempting to synchronize with the expected signal the information carried by the signal being transmitted is decoded. Any synchronization data from the information decoded is then retrieved. The synchronization data is then stored in association with the acquired signal.
- determining an amount of adjacent channel power produced includes identifying the type of signal acquired, and matching the signal with at least one of one or more predefined power profiles.
- the value for the power measured relative to the acquired signal is retrieved, and is used to compute an expected level of interference by reducing the measured power value a predetermined amount corresponding to the expected level of interference for each of the one or more sequentially adjacent channels.
- the predetermined amount is based upon the values corresponding to the matched predefined power profile.
- the present invention further provides a processor unit for use in a wireless communication device, coupled to a receiver, which establishes and maintains communications within a communication system by scanning for neighboring cells.
- the processor control unit includes a processor and an interface unit, coupled to said processor and the receiver, for configuring the receiver to receive signals corresponding to one or more neighboring cells, and for receiving characteristics of the signals received.
- a storage unit is coupled to said processor for storing characteristics of the one or more received signals and one or more sets of instructions for execution by the processor.
- the sets of instructions include prestored instructions for determining the measured power levels of the channels transmitted from the neighboring cells and generating a sorted list of channels, based upon measured power levels, prestored instructions for attempting to acquire, via the receiver, signals from the channels of the neighboring cells in descending order of the sorted power measurements, and prestored instructions for removing from the sorted list of channels any of one or more neighboring cells for which the measured power levels is substantially comprised of the adjacent channel power produced as part of a signal successfully acquired or otherwise identified.
- the processor unit is incorporated as part of a wireless communication device, where the wireless communication device includes a receiver and an antenna coupled to the receiver. In a still further embodiment, the wireless communication device further includes a transmitter coupled to the antenna.
- FIG. 1 is an exemplary topographical view of a geographical region representing a portion of the coverage area for a wireless communication system
- FIG. 2 is a view of an example power profile defining a reference interference level in one or more sequentially adjacent channels for a signal being transmitted in a particular channel;
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the electronic circuitry for at least one embodiment of the wireless communication device, which could be used to incorporate the present invention
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of a method for scanning for neighboring cells, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a more detailed flow diagram for attempting to acquire or otherwise identify a signal from the channels of the neighboring cells.
- FIG. 6 is a more detailed flow diagram for determining the amount of adjacent channel power produced as part of a signal from a channel, that was successfully acquired or otherwise identified.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary topographical view of portions of a wireless communication system.
- the topographical view 100 includes a plurality of cells 102 pictorially represented as hexagons. The hexagons are only rough approximations, where in reality the area of transmission is not so uniformly defined.
- Each cell is typically served by one or more base stations (BS) 104 , referred to as a serving station, which communicates with mobile stations (MS) 106 traveling within the corresponding cell 102 .
- BS base stations
- MS mobile stations
- the signals from the respective cells are distinguishable, as they are broadcast within distinct channels that are ideally substantially orthogonal to one another.
- the GSM standard includes channels, which are spaced 200 kHz apart.
- Each of the base stations is assigned one or more frequencies within a predefined band of frequencies. Because a signal being transmitted at one frequency can spill power into neighboring frequencies, sequential channels are preferably not used in the same geographical area.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a reference interference level 120 and a corresponding permissible power profile 121 including the level of allowable interference in nearby adjacent channels resulting from a signal being transmitted in a GSM system at a particular frequency, each shown using a solid line.
- the illustrated relationship between the reference interference level 120 and the permissible power profile assumes a required detection margin of 9 dB.
- the requirements for the reference interference levels can be found in the GSM specification 5.05, at section 6.3.
- the GSM specification allows for +9 dB of cochannel interference, ⁇ 9 dB of interference in adjacent channels 200 kHz away, ⁇ 41 dB of interference in adjacent channels 400 kHz away, and ⁇ 49 dB of interference in adjacent channels 600 kHz away.
- a detection margin that is different than 9 dB is possible. It may be possible to define detection margins having less than 9 dB, where the system includes improved receiver technology. A system having less than 9 dB may further be possible in a system, which includes additional information with a channel list. For example, some enhanced observed time difference (EOTD) systems reduce the required detection margin by providing predetermined or precomputed synchronization data as part of the additional information (assistance data) transmitted with the channel list (BA list).
- EOTD enhanced observed time difference
- the power levels of the channels of the neighboring cells are monitored for purposes of determining when a reselection or a handoff should be performed.
- the identity of the channels corresponding to the nearby neighboring cells is transmitted to a mobile subscriber by the serving base station in a list, referred to as the BA list.
- the BA list is intended to limit the necessary searching and can include up to 32 neighboring channels.
- the BA list includes a block of channels that a particular carrier is using in a location or area. This can sometimes lead to a wireless communication device attempting to acquire a signal for a channel, where the measured power for the channel is substantially comprised of adjacent channel power.
- the power profile for signals being transmitted by both the serving and neighboring base stations 104 corresponds to a power profile that is similar to the limits allowed by the GSM specification, as illustrated in FIG. 2. As noted above, these limits can change dependent upon differences in the required detection margin or the defined reference interference levels. Further assume that there exist two additional nearby cells, each respectively transmitting on a channel spaced 400 kHz away. The relative signal strengths, as seen by a mobile station 106 , of the signals 122 and 124 from the two neighboring cells are illustrated as dashed lines.
- the power level of the signal 122 on the channel spaced ⁇ 400 kHz away has a power level that exceeds both the reference interference level 120 and the spilled power produced by the signal 121 , each represented by a solid line.
- the power level of the signal 124 on the channel spaced +400 kHz away, while having a signal level that exceeds the spilled power produced by the signal 121 has a power level that falls below the required reference interference level 120 .
- an interference margin of approximately 20 dB exists. It is very likely that the signal on the channel spaced ⁇ 400 kHz could be successfully distinguished from the illustrated interference sources and be successfully acquired.
- an interference margin of approximately ⁇ 4 dB exits. Because the power level of the reference interference level exceeds the power level of the signal being transmitted on the channel, it is likely that the signal on the channel spaced +400 kHz could not be acquired. If a mobile station were to attempt to acquire this signal, a mobile station might make several attempts until the number of allowed attempts had been exceeded and the mobile station, then, attempted to acquire the other remaining channels in the list. Not only does this delay the scanning for other channels from the neighboring cells, but futile attempts to acquire a channel uses computational resources that could be devoted to other tasks and/or could allow the wireless communication device to be placed into a power conserving idle mode.
- a block diagram is illustrated of the electronic circuitry for at least one embodiment of a wireless communication device 100 , corresponding to the mobile station 106 illustrated in FIG. 1.
- the wireless communication device includes a radio receiver 201 and a transmitter 203 . Both the receiver 201 and the transmitter 203 are coupled to an antenna 205 of the wireless communication device by way of a duplexer 207 .
- the particular radio frequency to be used by the transmitter 203 and the receiver 201 is determined by the microprocessor 209 and conveyed to the frequency synthesizer 211 via the interface circuitry 213 .
- Data signals received by the receiver 201 are decoded and coupled to the microprocessor 209 by the interface circuitry 213 , and data signals to be transmitted by the transmitter 203 are generated by the microprocessor 209 and formatted by the interface circuitry 213 before being transmitted by the transmitter 203 . Operational status of the transmitter 203 and the receiver 201 is enabled or disabled by the interface circuitry 213 .
- the microprocessor 209 forms part of the processing unit, which in conjunction with the interface circuitry 213 performs the necessary processing functions under the control of programs stored in a memory section 215 .
- the microprocessor 209 and the interface circuitry 213 can include one or more microprocessors, one or more of which may include a digital signal processor (DSP).
- DSP digital signal processor
- the memory section 215 includes one or more forms of volatile and/or non-volatile memory including conventional ROM 221 , EPROM 223 , RAM 225 , or EEPROM 227 .
- Characterizing features of the wireless communication device are typically stored in EEPROM 227 (which may also be stored in the microprocessor in an on-board EEPROM, if available) and can include the number assignment (NAM) required for operation in a conventional cellular system and/or the base identification (BID) required for operation with a cordless base. Additionally stored in the memory section 215 are the multiple sets of prestored instructions used in scanning for neighboring cells.
- Control of user audio, the microphone 229 output and the speaker 231 input, is controlled by audio processing circuitry 219 , which forms part of a user interface circuit 233 .
- the user interface circuit 233 additionally includes user interface processing circuitry 235 , which manages the operation of any keypad(s) 237 and/or display(s) 239 . It is further envisioned that any keypad operation could be included as part of a touch sensitive display.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram 300 of a method for scanning for neighboring cells, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the present invention.
- the flow diagram can be implemented as part of the one or more sets of prestored instructions stored in the memory section 215 of the processing unit 217 for execution in conjunction with the microprocessor 209 .
- At least one example includes a set of prestored instructions for determining the measured power levels of the channels transmitted from the neighboring cells and generating a sorted list of channels, based upon power measurements.
- the multiple sets of prestored instructions can further include instructions for attempting to acquire, via the receiver, signals from the channels of the neighboring cells in descending order of the sorted power measurements, and prestored instructions for removing from the sorted list of channels any of one or more neighboring cells for which the measured power level is substantially comprised of the adjacent channel power, that is produced as part of a signal successfully acquired.
- Corresponding elements are illustrated as part of the flow diagram 300 .
- the method for scanning for neighboring cells initially includes measuring channel power 302 for the neighboring cells.
- the list of neighboring cells can be included as part of a list, in some instances referred to as a BA list, received from the current serving cell.
- the channels are then sorted 304 , based upon the power measurements.
- a signal from the neighboring cells is then attempted to be acquired 306 in descending order of the sorted power measurements. Generally, a finite number of the signals from the channels having the highest power measurements are attempted to be acquired. A determination is then made 308 as to whether a signal for the channel is successfully acquired. If a signal has not yet been successfully acquired, the attempts to acquire a signal continue until a signal is successfully acquired. When a signal has been successfully acquired, an amount of adjacent channel power produced as part of a signal successfully acquired is determined 310 . The amount of adjacent channel power is computed based upon a power profile, which is previously known or determined. In any particular system there can be more than one power profile used to compute the adjacent channel power. The specific power profile used can be based upon an identification of the type of signal acquired, or based upon a signal, which has been otherwise identified. A signal otherwise identified could have a source outside of the cellular communication system.
- the determined amount is then compared 312 against the amount of measured power for any corresponding channels in the list. If the measured channel power does not exceed the determined adjacent channel power 314 by a sufficient amount corresponding to a detection margin, if any, then the channel is identified as being substantially comprised of adjacent channel power, and the channel is removed from the sorted list of channels 316 as a channel which should be attempted to be acquired.
- the detection margin can vary, and in some instances, there may be no detection margin. In this way, a channel that is unlikely to have a signal that can be successfully acquired, but which is present on the list due to having a sufficiently high power measurement, and which substantially comprises adjacent channel power, can be removed without attempting to acquire the signal.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a more detailed flow diagram 320 for attempting to acquire a signal 306 from the channels of the neighboring cells.
- the more detailed flow diagram 320 includes searching for a channel 322 from the next channel in the sorted list of channels. A determination is then made 324 as to whether a signal has been found. If a signal is found, the signal is decoded 326 to decipher the information being transmitted. Synchronization data, if present, is then retrieved 328 from the decoded information. The synchronization data is then stored 330 in association with the acquired signal, for use by the wireless communication device, in the event that a decision is made to transfer control to the corresponding neighboring cell for facilitating further communication via the new channel.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a more detailed flow diagram 340 for determining an amount of adjacent channel power produced 310 as part of a signal successfully acquired.
- the type of signal acquired is identified 342 .
- the signal is matched 344 with at least one of the one or more predefined power profiles.
- the power level of the acquired signal is then retrieved 346 .
- the retrieved power level is then reduced an amount 348 , based upon a known difference between the primary power levels and the power levels of the expected power produced in each of the adjacent channels as defined by the predefined power profile.
- the adjacent power levels being determined and being compared with the group of sorted channels can be determined in connection with acquiring the signal from the channel on which the wireless communication device is presently communicating, or from a channel successfully acquired as part of the scanning for neighboring cells.
- the sorted list of channels would include, in order, the channel at 0 kHz, ⁇ 400 kHz and +400 kHz. Having the highest power level in the sorted list, an attempt to acquire a signal from the channel at 0 kHz would be made. Upon successful acquisition of the channel, a determination would be made as to the expected power levels produced in the adjacent channels by the transmission of the acquired signal.
- the determined power levels of the adjacent channels would then be compared against the actually measured power levels of the adjacent channels. In at least some instances, this will include taking into account a corresponding detection margin, if any. If the measured power levels did not exceed the expected power levels produced by adjacent channel power, the channel would be removed from the list on the assumption that an attempt to acquire a signal at that channel would be futile given the known level of interference or noise produced as part of signal of the already acquired channel. In this instance the channel at +400 kHz would be eliminated from the list.
- the channel at ⁇ 400 kHz would remain in the list of channels to be acquired and an attempt to acquire the signal at ⁇ 400 kHz might still be made.
- the BA list had additionally included the channels at +200 kHz and ⁇ 200 kHz, these channels would have been similarly eliminated from consideration, based upon an analysis of the adjacent channel power produced as part of the signal transmitted at channel 0 kHz.
- a wireless communication device generally, would have attempted to acquire a signal at ⁇ 200 kHz and +200 kHz, based upon the presence of a substantial power level, if the channel had been included in the BA list. This is the case, despite the fact that the power levels were substantially comprised of adjacent channel power, and that no measurable legitimate signal exists on the channel.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates generally to the scanning of neighboring cells by a wireless communication device in a cellular communication network and, more particularly, to reducing scanning times by eliminating from consideration channels where the measured power is substantially comprised of adjacent channel power.
- Mobile subscribers use wireless communication devices to communicate over a cellular wireless communication network by transmitting and receiving wireless signals between the wireless communication devices and one or more base stations, located at varying distances proximate to the various mobile subscribers.
- Changing conditions, including movement of the mobile subscribers relative to the one or more base stations, will often necessitate that the wireless communication devices identify a different base station for facilitating further communication within the network. A decision to select a new serving base station, based upon the movement of the mobile subscriber relative to the one or more base stations, is often the result of a change in the received signal strength between the wireless communication devices and the previous serving base station. Either the received signal strength between the previous serving base station has degraded to an unacceptable level and/or a stronger signal is now available between the wireless communication device and a new alternative base station.
- To insure that the wireless communication device is consistently communicating with the best available serving base station, a wireless communication device will periodically scan for neighboring cells and corresponding base stations. When appropriate, a communication device will initiate a reselection or a handover. A handover occurs when a new serving base station is selected, while the wireless communication device is in dedicated mode (e.g. when a call is in progress). A reselection occurs when a new serving base station is selected, while the wireless communication device is in idle mode. A similar selection process will also take place when power is initially applied to the wireless communication device, and the wireless communication device is initially locating itself within the network.
- Medium-sized band GSM systems, corresponding to the Global System for Mobile Communications, generally provide 200 kHz carrier separation between channels. However, given the power profile of a typical signal, spilled power can occur in several sequentially adjacent channels at various attenuation levels. The GSM specification defines a reference interference level for several sequentially adjacent channels, which corresponds to a detectability level and the allowable amounts of adjacent channel power. In the case of an immediately adjacent channel or a channel 200 kHz away, the GSM specification provides a reference interference level that is less than −9 dB, relative to the power transmitted on the primary channel. For adjacent channels 400 kHz and 600 kHz away, the GSM specification requires that the reference interference level not exceed −41 dB and −49 dB, respectively.
- The GSM specification further provides a detection margin of 9 dB. This translates to a limit of spilled power in the amounts of −18 dB in an immediately adjacent channel, and requires that the spilled power not exceed −50 dB and −58 dB for channels 400 kHz and 600 kHz away, respectively.
- In some instances, the spilled power in an adjacent channel can have a power level, which is sufficiently strong to be observable by the wireless communication device. For example, if a primary signal was received by the wireless communication device with a signal strength of −41 dB, the immediately adjacent channel might have a power level as seen by the wireless communication device, which is substantially comprised of spilled power, that has a power level of −59 dB, and still be within the limits for spilled power allowed in the specification. Furthermore, a channel having a power level of −59 dB is sufficiently strong, so as to be identified as a channel having a potentially detectable signal. Generally, to have sufficient power for receiving a signal on a particular channel, the signal needs to have a signal strength greater than −104 dBm, also known as the reference sensitivity level. In the same example, spilled power can produce a channel power level of −91 dB and −99 dB in the adjacent channels 400 kHz and 600 kHz away, respectively, that is seen by the wireless communication device. At −91 dB and −99 dB, both of the channel power levels are similarly sufficiently strong to be identified as channels, which potentially have signals of interest.
- Preferably, standard frequency planning will provide that nearby channels will not be used in the same geographical area, in order to minimize the effects of interfering spilled power from an adjacent channel. However sometimes, even if the nearby channels have not been used, the system can still include the nearby channel in a list of defined neighboring cells that is transmitted by the serving cell, which is then used to monitor and search for neighboring cells. In these instances, a wireless communication device can sometimes spend time and energy trying to acquire a signal on a nearby channel, where the power measured for the channel is substantially comprised of spilled power from an adjacent channel, and where there is little hope of acquiring a signal. A wireless device can sometimes make several attempts to acquire a signal before exceeding the limit on the allowed number of attempts and attempting to acquire the next channel in the list.
- Consequently, there is a need for a method and apparatus for scanning neighboring cells, which can eliminate from consideration and from the list of channels to be scanned, channels where the detected power levels are determined to be substantially comprised of adjacent channel power.
- The present invention provides a method of scanning for neighboring cells. The method includes measuring the channel power from the neighboring cells and sorting the channels based upon the power measurements. An attempt is then made to acquire or otherwise identify a signal from the channels of the neighboring cells in descending order of the sorted power measurements. When a signal from a channel is successfully acquired or otherwise identified, an amount of adjacent channel power is determined, which was produced as part of the signal from the channel successfully acquired or otherwise identified.
- The determined adjacent channel power is then compared to the measured power for any corresponding channels in the sorted list of channels. Any channel for which the measured power is substantially comprised of adjacent channel power is then removed from the group of sorted channels.
- In at least one embodiment, attempting to acquire a signal from the channels of the neighboring cells includes searching for a signal being transmitted on a selected channel, and attempting to synchronize with the expected signal. In attempting to synchronize with the expected signal the information carried by the signal being transmitted is decoded. Any synchronization data from the information decoded is then retrieved. The synchronization data is then stored in association with the acquired signal.
- In at least a further embodiment, determining an amount of adjacent channel power produced includes identifying the type of signal acquired, and matching the signal with at least one of one or more predefined power profiles. In a still further embodiment, the value for the power measured relative to the acquired signal is retrieved, and is used to compute an expected level of interference by reducing the measured power value a predetermined amount corresponding to the expected level of interference for each of the one or more sequentially adjacent channels. In at least some instances, the predetermined amount is based upon the values corresponding to the matched predefined power profile.
- The present invention further provides a processor unit for use in a wireless communication device, coupled to a receiver, which establishes and maintains communications within a communication system by scanning for neighboring cells. The processor control unit includes a processor and an interface unit, coupled to said processor and the receiver, for configuring the receiver to receive signals corresponding to one or more neighboring cells, and for receiving characteristics of the signals received. A storage unit is coupled to said processor for storing characteristics of the one or more received signals and one or more sets of instructions for execution by the processor.
- The sets of instructions include prestored instructions for determining the measured power levels of the channels transmitted from the neighboring cells and generating a sorted list of channels, based upon measured power levels, prestored instructions for attempting to acquire, via the receiver, signals from the channels of the neighboring cells in descending order of the sorted power measurements, and prestored instructions for removing from the sorted list of channels any of one or more neighboring cells for which the measured power levels is substantially comprised of the adjacent channel power produced as part of a signal successfully acquired or otherwise identified.
- In at least one of the embodiments, the processor unit is incorporated as part of a wireless communication device, where the wireless communication device includes a receiver and an antenna coupled to the receiver. In a still further embodiment, the wireless communication device further includes a transmitter coupled to the antenna.
- These and other objects, features, and advantages of this invention are evident from the following description of one or more preferred embodiments of this invention, with reference to the accompanying drawings.
- FIG. 1 is an exemplary topographical view of a geographical region representing a portion of the coverage area for a wireless communication system;
- FIG. 2 is a view of an example power profile defining a reference interference level in one or more sequentially adjacent channels for a signal being transmitted in a particular channel;
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the electronic circuitry for at least one embodiment of the wireless communication device, which could be used to incorporate the present invention;
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of a method for scanning for neighboring cells, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the present invention;
- FIG. 5 is a more detailed flow diagram for attempting to acquire or otherwise identify a signal from the channels of the neighboring cells; and
- FIG. 6 is a more detailed flow diagram for determining the amount of adjacent channel power produced as part of a signal from a channel, that was successfully acquired or otherwise identified.
- While the present invention is susceptible of embodiment in various forms, there is shown in the drawings and will hereinafter be described presently preferred embodiments with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiments illustrated.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary topographical view of portions of a wireless communication system. The
topographical view 100 includes a plurality ofcells 102 pictorially represented as hexagons. The hexagons are only rough approximations, where in reality the area of transmission is not so uniformly defined. Each cell is typically served by one or more base stations (BS) 104, referred to as a serving station, which communicates with mobile stations (MS) 106 traveling within thecorresponding cell 102. - Generally, the further a
mobile station 106 moves away from theserving base station 104 the weaker the signal gets. Conversely, as amobile station 106 moves toward abase station 104 the signal typically becomes stronger. As amobile station 106 continues to move away from a servingbase station 104 and towards abase station 104 of aneighboring cell 102, at some point it will become desirable to transfer control of the continued communication to thebase station 104 of the neighboringcell 102. The decision to transfer control is typically determined based upon the relative strength of the signal received from the serving base station and the base stations of each of thenearby cells 102. Consequently, wireless communication devices operating in association with several over the air operating standards monitor the relative strength of signals from both the serving cell and the one or more nearby neighboring cells. - Generally, the signals from the respective cells are distinguishable, as they are broadcast within distinct channels that are ideally substantially orthogonal to one another. As noted above, the GSM standard includes channels, which are spaced 200 kHz apart. Each of the base stations is assigned one or more frequencies within a predefined band of frequencies. Because a signal being transmitted at one frequency can spill power into neighboring frequencies, sequential channels are preferably not used in the same geographical area.
- The GSM specification has established very specific limits on the reference interference level, which affects the amount of spilled power that can be transmitted in a sequentially adjacent channel. FIG. 2 illustrates a
reference interference level 120 and a correspondingpermissible power profile 121 including the level of allowable interference in nearby adjacent channels resulting from a signal being transmitted in a GSM system at a particular frequency, each shown using a solid line. The illustrated relationship between thereference interference level 120 and the permissible power profile assumes a required detection margin of 9 dB. For a GSM system, the requirements for the reference interference levels can be found in the GSM specification 5.05, at section 6.3. The GSM specification allows for +9 dB of cochannel interference, −9 dB of interference in adjacent channels 200 kHz away, −41 dB of interference in adjacent channels 400 kHz away, and −49 dB of interference in adjacent channels 600 kHz away. - In some systems, a detection margin that is different than 9 dB is possible. It may be possible to define detection margins having less than 9 dB, where the system includes improved receiver technology. A system having less than 9 dB may further be possible in a system, which includes additional information with a channel list. For example, some enhanced observed time difference (EOTD) systems reduce the required detection margin by providing predetermined or precomputed synchronization data as part of the additional information (assistance data) transmitted with the channel list (BA list).
- The power levels of the channels of the neighboring cells are monitored for purposes of determining when a reselection or a handoff should be performed. The identity of the channels corresponding to the nearby neighboring cells is transmitted to a mobile subscriber by the serving base station in a list, referred to as the BA list. The BA list is intended to limit the necessary searching and can include up to 32 neighboring channels. Unfortunately, there are no rules requiring that the only channels listed are the channels that the mobile subscriber has any likelihood of detecting. Sometimes the BA list includes a block of channels that a particular carrier is using in a location or area. This can sometimes lead to a wireless communication device attempting to acquire a signal for a channel, where the measured power for the channel is substantially comprised of adjacent channel power.
- For illustrative purposes, it is assumed that the power profile for signals being transmitted by both the serving and neighboring
base stations 104, corresponds to a power profile that is similar to the limits allowed by the GSM specification, as illustrated in FIG. 2. As noted above, these limits can change dependent upon differences in the required detection margin or the defined reference interference levels. Further assume that there exist two additional nearby cells, each respectively transmitting on a channel spaced 400 kHz away. The relative signal strengths, as seen by amobile station 106, of thesignals - In the first example, the power level of the
signal 122 on the channel spaced −400 kHz away has a power level that exceeds both thereference interference level 120 and the spilled power produced by thesignal 121, each represented by a solid line. Alternatively, the power level of thesignal 124 on the channel spaced +400 kHz away, while having a signal level that exceeds the spilled power produced by thesignal 121, has a power level that falls below the requiredreference interference level 120. In the first instance, an interference margin of approximately 20 dB exists. It is very likely that the signal on the channel spaced −400 kHz could be successfully distinguished from the illustrated interference sources and be successfully acquired. In the second instance, an interference margin of approximately −4 dB exits. Because the power level of the reference interference level exceeds the power level of the signal being transmitted on the channel, it is likely that the signal on the channel spaced +400 kHz could not be acquired. If a mobile station were to attempt to acquire this signal, a mobile station might make several attempts until the number of allowed attempts had been exceeded and the mobile station, then, attempted to acquire the other remaining channels in the list. Not only does this delay the scanning for other channels from the neighboring cells, but futile attempts to acquire a channel uses computational resources that could be devoted to other tasks and/or could allow the wireless communication device to be placed into a power conserving idle mode. - A block diagram is illustrated of the electronic circuitry for at least one embodiment of a
wireless communication device 100, corresponding to themobile station 106 illustrated in FIG. 1. The wireless communication device includes aradio receiver 201 and atransmitter 203. Both thereceiver 201 and thetransmitter 203 are coupled to anantenna 205 of the wireless communication device by way of aduplexer 207. The particular radio frequency to be used by thetransmitter 203 and thereceiver 201 is determined by the microprocessor 209 and conveyed to thefrequency synthesizer 211 via theinterface circuitry 213. Data signals received by thereceiver 201 are decoded and coupled to the microprocessor 209 by theinterface circuitry 213, and data signals to be transmitted by thetransmitter 203 are generated by the microprocessor 209 and formatted by theinterface circuitry 213 before being transmitted by thetransmitter 203. Operational status of thetransmitter 203 and thereceiver 201 is enabled or disabled by theinterface circuitry 213. - In the preferred embodiment, the microprocessor209 forms part of the processing unit, which in conjunction with the
interface circuitry 213 performs the necessary processing functions under the control of programs stored in amemory section 215. Together, the microprocessor 209 and theinterface circuitry 213 can include one or more microprocessors, one or more of which may include a digital signal processor (DSP). Thememory section 215 includes one or more forms of volatile and/or non-volatile memory includingconventional ROM 221,EPROM 223,RAM 225, or EEPROM 227. Characterizing features of the wireless communication device are typically stored in EEPROM 227 (which may also be stored in the microprocessor in an on-board EEPROM, if available) and can include the number assignment (NAM) required for operation in a conventional cellular system and/or the base identification (BID) required for operation with a cordless base. Additionally stored in thememory section 215 are the multiple sets of prestored instructions used in scanning for neighboring cells. - Control of user audio, the
microphone 229 output and thespeaker 231 input, is controlled byaudio processing circuitry 219, which forms part of a user interface circuit 233. The user interface circuit 233 additionally includes userinterface processing circuitry 235, which manages the operation of any keypad(s) 237 and/or display(s) 239. It is further envisioned that any keypad operation could be included as part of a touch sensitive display. - FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram300 of a method for scanning for neighboring cells, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the present invention. Generally the flow diagram can be implemented as part of the one or more sets of prestored instructions stored in the
memory section 215 of theprocessing unit 217 for execution in conjunction with the microprocessor 209. At least one example includes a set of prestored instructions for determining the measured power levels of the channels transmitted from the neighboring cells and generating a sorted list of channels, based upon power measurements. The multiple sets of prestored instructions can further include instructions for attempting to acquire, via the receiver, signals from the channels of the neighboring cells in descending order of the sorted power measurements, and prestored instructions for removing from the sorted list of channels any of one or more neighboring cells for which the measured power level is substantially comprised of the adjacent channel power, that is produced as part of a signal successfully acquired. Corresponding elements are illustrated as part of the flow diagram 300. - More specifically, the method for scanning for neighboring cells, illustrated in the flow diagram300, initially includes measuring
channel power 302 for the neighboring cells. As noted previously, the list of neighboring cells can be included as part of a list, in some instances referred to as a BA list, received from the current serving cell. The channels are then sorted 304, based upon the power measurements. - A signal from the neighboring cells is then attempted to be acquired306 in descending order of the sorted power measurements. Generally, a finite number of the signals from the channels having the highest power measurements are attempted to be acquired. A determination is then made 308 as to whether a signal for the channel is successfully acquired. If a signal has not yet been successfully acquired, the attempts to acquire a signal continue until a signal is successfully acquired. When a signal has been successfully acquired, an amount of adjacent channel power produced as part of a signal successfully acquired is determined 310. The amount of adjacent channel power is computed based upon a power profile, which is previously known or determined. In any particular system there can be more than one power profile used to compute the adjacent channel power. The specific power profile used can be based upon an identification of the type of signal acquired, or based upon a signal, which has been otherwise identified. A signal otherwise identified could have a source outside of the cellular communication system.
- After an amount of adjacent channel power is determined, the determined amount is then compared312 against the amount of measured power for any corresponding channels in the list. If the measured channel power does not exceed the determined
adjacent channel power 314 by a sufficient amount corresponding to a detection margin, if any, then the channel is identified as being substantially comprised of adjacent channel power, and the channel is removed from the sorted list ofchannels 316 as a channel which should be attempted to be acquired. As noted previously, the detection margin can vary, and in some instances, there may be no detection margin. In this way, a channel that is unlikely to have a signal that can be successfully acquired, but which is present on the list due to having a sufficiently high power measurement, and which substantially comprises adjacent channel power, can be removed without attempting to acquire the signal. - If there are additional channels in the sorted
list 318, an attempt is made to acquire a signal from the remainingchannels 306. Otherwise, the method is concluded. - FIG. 5 illustrates a more detailed flow diagram320 for attempting to acquire a
signal 306 from the channels of the neighboring cells. The more detailed flow diagram 320 includes searching for achannel 322 from the next channel in the sorted list of channels. A determination is then made 324 as to whether a signal has been found. If a signal is found, the signal is decoded 326 to decipher the information being transmitted. Synchronization data, if present, is then retrieved 328 from the decoded information. The synchronization data is then stored 330 in association with the acquired signal, for use by the wireless communication device, in the event that a decision is made to transfer control to the corresponding neighboring cell for facilitating further communication via the new channel. - FIG. 6 illustrates a more detailed flow diagram340 for determining an amount of adjacent channel power produced 310 as part of a signal successfully acquired. Initially, the type of signal acquired is identified 342. After the type of signal is identified, the signal is matched 344 with at least one of the one or more predefined power profiles. The power level of the acquired signal is then retrieved 346. The retrieved power level is then reduced an
amount 348, based upon a known difference between the primary power levels and the power levels of the expected power produced in each of the adjacent channels as defined by the predefined power profile. - By matching the identified signal to one of the one or more predefined power profiles, signals having different power profiles can be accommodated. Furthermore, the adjacent power levels being determined and being compared with the group of sorted channels can be determined in connection with acquiring the signal from the channel on which the wireless communication device is presently communicating, or from a channel successfully acquired as part of the scanning for neighboring cells.
- In order to help further illustrate the present invention, reference is made to the example illustrated in FIG. 2. If the BA list included in the list of channels for the neighboring cells the channels at 0 kHz, +400 kHz and −400 kHz, after measuring the channel power levels and sorting the same, the sorted list of channels would include, in order, the channel at 0 kHz, −400 kHz and +400 kHz. Having the highest power level in the sorted list, an attempt to acquire a signal from the channel at 0 kHz would be made. Upon successful acquisition of the channel, a determination would be made as to the expected power levels produced in the adjacent channels by the transmission of the acquired signal.
- The determined power levels of the adjacent channels would then be compared against the actually measured power levels of the adjacent channels. In at least some instances, this will include taking into account a corresponding detection margin, if any. If the measured power levels did not exceed the expected power levels produced by adjacent channel power, the channel would be removed from the list on the assumption that an attempt to acquire a signal at that channel would be futile given the known level of interference or noise produced as part of signal of the already acquired channel. In this instance the channel at +400 kHz would be eliminated from the list. However, because the measured power levels at −400 kHz exceeds the determined adjacent channel power produced as part of the signal transmitted at
channel 0 kHz, the channel at −400 kHz would remain in the list of channels to be acquired and an attempt to acquire the signal at −400 kHz might still be made. - If the BA list had additionally included the channels at +200 kHz and −200 kHz, these channels would have been similarly eliminated from consideration, based upon an analysis of the adjacent channel power produced as part of the signal transmitted at
channel 0 kHz. Previously a wireless communication device, generally, would have attempted to acquire a signal at −200 kHz and +200 kHz, based upon the presence of a substantial power level, if the channel had been included in the BA list. This is the case, despite the fact that the power levels were substantially comprised of adjacent channel power, and that no measurable legitimate signal exists on the channel. By removing these channels from the list of channels to be acquired, channels which can not be acquired are eliminated from the process for scanning for neighboring cells without going through the process of attempting to acquire the signal, resulting in a more efficient process. - While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not so limited. Numerous modifications, changes, variations, substitutions and equivalents will occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims (18)
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/219,231 US6985733B2 (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2002-08-15 | Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells |
EP03788320.4A EP1532824B1 (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2003-08-05 | Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells |
AU2003257169A AU2003257169A1 (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2003-08-05 | Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells |
CN038194007A CN1675942B (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2003-08-05 | Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells |
PCT/US2003/024392 WO2004017648A1 (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2003-08-05 | Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells |
TW092122548A TWI329470B (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2003-08-15 | Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/219,231 US6985733B2 (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2002-08-15 | Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040033804A1 true US20040033804A1 (en) | 2004-02-19 |
US6985733B2 US6985733B2 (en) | 2006-01-10 |
Family
ID=31714703
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/219,231 Expired - Lifetime US6985733B2 (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2002-08-15 | Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6985733B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1532824B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1675942B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003257169A1 (en) |
TW (1) | TWI329470B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004017648A1 (en) |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040266474A1 (en) * | 2003-06-25 | 2004-12-30 | Paul Petrus | Criteria for base station selection, including handover, in a wireless communication system |
US20050153712A1 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2005-07-14 | Ken Osaka | Method and system for determining mobile unit location by aggregation of tagged signals from a distributed antenna system |
US20050277416A1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2005-12-15 | Nokia Corporation | Measurements in communications systems |
US20050282547A1 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2005-12-22 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System for handover in BWA communication system and method thereof |
US20060063530A1 (en) * | 2004-09-08 | 2006-03-23 | Spreadtrum Communications Corporation | Method for cell locking in a wireless communication device |
US20080232328A1 (en) * | 2007-03-23 | 2008-09-25 | Stefan Scheinert | Localization of a mobile device in distributed antenna communications system |
US20090111466A1 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2009-04-30 | Michael Montemurro | WLAN scanning by prevalence of access point deployment on certain channels |
FR2924547A1 (en) * | 2007-12-04 | 2009-06-05 | Wavecom Sa | Mobile equipment i.e. portable telephone, synchronizing method for global system for mobile communications type radiocommunication network, involves selecting frequency, and performing synchronization on selected frequency |
WO2010045048A2 (en) * | 2008-10-17 | 2010-04-22 | Motorola, Inc. | Methods for site selection in a multi-site communication system |
US20100136969A1 (en) * | 2008-12-01 | 2010-06-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Neighbor Cell List Compilation Methods and Apparatus |
EP2219406A1 (en) * | 2009-02-11 | 2010-08-18 | Motorola, Inc. | Base station selection for a wireless communication system |
CN103379535A (en) * | 2012-04-19 | 2013-10-30 | 展讯通信(上海)有限公司 | Communication terminal and cell measuring method and device of communication terminal |
US9001811B2 (en) | 2009-05-19 | 2015-04-07 | Adc Telecommunications, Inc. | Method of inserting CDMA beacon pilots in output of distributed remote antenna nodes |
CN104955131A (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2015-09-30 | 捷讯研究有限公司 | Wlan scanning by prevalence of access point deployment on certain channels |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4479307B2 (en) * | 2004-03-30 | 2010-06-09 | 日本電気株式会社 | Wireless communication terminal and method for establishing wireless communication early |
KR100893861B1 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2009-04-20 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Peripheral base station scanning method applied to broadband wireless access system |
US8060084B2 (en) * | 2005-04-28 | 2011-11-15 | Research In Motion Limited | Network selection scheme using a roaming broker (RB) |
US20060246899A1 (en) * | 2005-04-28 | 2006-11-02 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for providing network advertisement information via a network advertisement broker (NAB) |
US8428584B2 (en) | 2005-07-01 | 2013-04-23 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for accelerating network selection by a wireless user equipment (UE) device |
US8045981B2 (en) * | 2005-08-18 | 2011-10-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System search to detect for a wireless communication network in a crowded frequency band |
US8010105B2 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2011-08-30 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for facilitating accelerated network selection using a weighted network list |
EP1858278B1 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2013-05-15 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for facilitating accelerated network selection in a radio network enviroment |
CN101873672B (en) * | 2009-04-27 | 2012-10-31 | 雷凌科技股份有限公司 | Method, device and system for wireless channel scanning |
US11063675B2 (en) * | 2019-03-05 | 2021-07-13 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Wireless spectrum management and optimization for dual transceiver operation |
CN111246541B (en) * | 2020-01-13 | 2021-11-16 | Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 | Cell residence method, terminal and storage medium |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5258981A (en) * | 1990-11-14 | 1993-11-02 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Method of operating a communications system, a communications system and a secondary station for use in the system |
US5263055A (en) * | 1991-11-04 | 1993-11-16 | Motorola, Inc. | Apparatus and method for reducing harmonic interference generated by a clock signal |
US5809419A (en) * | 1994-12-14 | 1998-09-15 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for reducing channel scanning time |
US6067460A (en) * | 1996-05-23 | 2000-05-23 | Nokia Mobile Phones Limited | Mobile station having enhanced standby mode |
US6205334B1 (en) * | 1998-11-24 | 2001-03-20 | Ericsson Inc. | Accelerated scanning of cellular channels by cellular radiotelephones |
US6392565B1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2002-05-21 | Eworldtrack, Inc. | Automobile tracking and anti-theft system |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4794635A (en) * | 1986-11-28 | 1988-12-27 | Motorola, Inc. | Two-way radio communication system with max-minimum call assignment method |
US5203012A (en) * | 1992-02-10 | 1993-04-13 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optimum channel assignment |
US5448750A (en) * | 1992-04-22 | 1995-09-05 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Segregation method of dynamic channel allocation in a mobile radio system |
US5752164A (en) * | 1992-04-27 | 1998-05-12 | American Pcs L.P. | Autonomous remote measurement unit for a personal communications service system |
US5915221A (en) * | 1995-08-08 | 1999-06-22 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Neighbor cell list creation and verification in a telecommunications system |
US5884184A (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 1999-03-16 | Sheffer; Eliezer Arie | Supervised cellular reporting network |
GB2327014B (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2002-04-24 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Mobile communications system |
US5966657A (en) * | 1997-07-24 | 1999-10-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method and system for radio frequency measurement and automatic frequency planning in a cellular radio system |
US6128473A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-10-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method for frequency plan revision within a cellular telephone system using downlink interference estimates |
TW428388B (en) | 1998-02-20 | 2001-04-01 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | A power consumption reduction method in a digital mobile radio system and a mobile radio station |
US6570861B1 (en) * | 1998-11-20 | 2003-05-27 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for assigning use of a radio frequency communication resource |
US6240275B1 (en) * | 1998-12-30 | 2001-05-29 | Ericsson Inc. | System and method for channel assignment based upon interference and channel quality measurements |
JP3690717B2 (en) * | 1999-07-14 | 2005-08-31 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Cell search control method, mobile station, and mobile communication system |
US7206580B2 (en) * | 1999-11-04 | 2007-04-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for performing handoff in a high speed communication system |
US6909757B2 (en) * | 2001-05-14 | 2005-06-21 | Ericsson Inc. | Methods, transmitters, and computer program products for transmitting a signal by adjusting a delay between an amplitude component of the signal and a phase component of the signal based on the transmission power |
-
2002
- 2002-08-15 US US10/219,231 patent/US6985733B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2003
- 2003-08-05 WO PCT/US2003/024392 patent/WO2004017648A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-08-05 EP EP03788320.4A patent/EP1532824B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-08-05 AU AU2003257169A patent/AU2003257169A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-08-05 CN CN038194007A patent/CN1675942B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-08-15 TW TW092122548A patent/TWI329470B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5258981A (en) * | 1990-11-14 | 1993-11-02 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Method of operating a communications system, a communications system and a secondary station for use in the system |
US5263055A (en) * | 1991-11-04 | 1993-11-16 | Motorola, Inc. | Apparatus and method for reducing harmonic interference generated by a clock signal |
US5809419A (en) * | 1994-12-14 | 1998-09-15 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for reducing channel scanning time |
US6067460A (en) * | 1996-05-23 | 2000-05-23 | Nokia Mobile Phones Limited | Mobile station having enhanced standby mode |
US6205334B1 (en) * | 1998-11-24 | 2001-03-20 | Ericsson Inc. | Accelerated scanning of cellular channels by cellular radiotelephones |
US6393284B1 (en) * | 1998-11-24 | 2002-05-21 | Ericsson Inc. | Systems and methods for searching for TDMA signals in cellular radiotelephones |
US6392565B1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2002-05-21 | Eworldtrack, Inc. | Automobile tracking and anti-theft system |
Cited By (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090073892A1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2009-03-19 | Antti Tolli | Measurements in communications systems |
US20050277416A1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2005-12-15 | Nokia Corporation | Measurements in communications systems |
US8200221B2 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2012-06-12 | Intellectual Ventures I Llc | Measurements in communications systems |
US8090376B2 (en) | 2002-09-10 | 2012-01-03 | Intellectual Ventures I Llc | Measurements in communications systems |
US20090042577A1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2009-02-12 | Antti Tolli | Measurements in communications systems |
US6954643B2 (en) * | 2003-06-25 | 2005-10-11 | Arraycomm Llc | Criteria for base station selection, including handover, in a wireless communication system |
US20040266474A1 (en) * | 2003-06-25 | 2004-12-30 | Paul Petrus | Criteria for base station selection, including handover, in a wireless communication system |
US20050153712A1 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2005-07-14 | Ken Osaka | Method and system for determining mobile unit location by aggregation of tagged signals from a distributed antenna system |
US20050282547A1 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2005-12-22 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System for handover in BWA communication system and method thereof |
US7813320B2 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2010-10-12 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | System for handover in BWA communication system and method thereof |
US7574210B2 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2009-08-11 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | System for handover in BWA communication system and method thereof |
US20090262705A1 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2009-10-22 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System for handover in bwa communication system and method thereof |
US20060063530A1 (en) * | 2004-09-08 | 2006-03-23 | Spreadtrum Communications Corporation | Method for cell locking in a wireless communication device |
US20090111466A1 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2009-04-30 | Michael Montemurro | WLAN scanning by prevalence of access point deployment on certain channels |
CN104955131A (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2015-09-30 | 捷讯研究有限公司 | Wlan scanning by prevalence of access point deployment on certain channels |
US20100267380A2 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2010-10-21 | Research In Motion Limited | Wlan scanning by prevalence of access point deployment on certain channels |
US8467785B2 (en) | 2006-10-24 | 2013-06-18 | Research In Motion Limited | WLAN scanning by prevalence of access point deployment on certain channels |
USRE45505E1 (en) | 2007-03-23 | 2015-05-05 | Adc Telecommunications, Inc. | Localization of a mobile device in distributed antenna communications system |
US20080232328A1 (en) * | 2007-03-23 | 2008-09-25 | Stefan Scheinert | Localization of a mobile device in distributed antenna communications system |
US8005050B2 (en) | 2007-03-23 | 2011-08-23 | Lgc Wireless, Inc. | Localization of a mobile device in distributed antenna communications system |
FR2924547A1 (en) * | 2007-12-04 | 2009-06-05 | Wavecom Sa | Mobile equipment i.e. portable telephone, synchronizing method for global system for mobile communications type radiocommunication network, involves selecting frequency, and performing synchronization on selected frequency |
US20100099404A1 (en) * | 2008-10-17 | 2010-04-22 | Motorola, Inc. | Methods for site selection in a multi-site communication system |
US8045982B2 (en) * | 2008-10-17 | 2011-10-25 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Methods for site selection in a multi-site communication system |
WO2010045048A3 (en) * | 2008-10-17 | 2010-07-01 | Motorola, Inc. | Methods for site selection in a multi-site communication system |
WO2010045048A2 (en) * | 2008-10-17 | 2010-04-22 | Motorola, Inc. | Methods for site selection in a multi-site communication system |
US8611896B2 (en) * | 2008-12-01 | 2013-12-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericssson (Publ) | Neighbor cell list compilation methods and apparatus |
US20100136969A1 (en) * | 2008-12-01 | 2010-06-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Neighbor Cell List Compilation Methods and Apparatus |
EP2219406A1 (en) * | 2009-02-11 | 2010-08-18 | Motorola, Inc. | Base station selection for a wireless communication system |
US9001811B2 (en) | 2009-05-19 | 2015-04-07 | Adc Telecommunications, Inc. | Method of inserting CDMA beacon pilots in output of distributed remote antenna nodes |
CN103379535A (en) * | 2012-04-19 | 2013-10-30 | 展讯通信(上海)有限公司 | Communication terminal and cell measuring method and device of communication terminal |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1532824A4 (en) | 2010-01-06 |
AU2003257169A1 (en) | 2004-03-03 |
CN1675942B (en) | 2010-05-26 |
US6985733B2 (en) | 2006-01-10 |
TW200423751A (en) | 2004-11-01 |
WO2004017648A1 (en) | 2004-02-26 |
TWI329470B (en) | 2010-08-21 |
CN1675942A (en) | 2005-09-28 |
EP1532824A1 (en) | 2005-05-25 |
EP1532824B1 (en) | 2016-02-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6985733B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells | |
JP3851525B2 (en) | Mobile station apparatus, mobile communication system, and carrier detection method | |
US6757550B1 (en) | Mobile station and base station | |
CA2203256C (en) | Pilot signal searching technique for a cellular communications system | |
JP4246270B2 (en) | Method for identifying base station of time division cellular network in mobile station and mobile station | |
US5754956A (en) | Methodical scanning method and apparatus for portable radiotelephones | |
JP2805565B2 (en) | Control channel selection method in mobile station | |
CA2163937C (en) | Method for channel scanning | |
KR100627637B1 (en) | Remote network controller to decide whether to initiate a handover | |
US6477367B1 (en) | System and method for identifying hot spots in the D-AMPS wireless system | |
KR100547806B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for measuring position of mobile terminal | |
US8391799B2 (en) | Mobile communication terminal performing cell search process | |
US20090186615A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for terminal handover between systems using different frequency allocations | |
KR100311674B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining whether a wireless station is operating within a prescribed geographic region | |
US5937351A (en) | Method for establishing a wireless communications link in a reduced time | |
US20080025262A1 (en) | Method for performing handoff from WiBro(WIMAX) service to wireless LAN service and terminal apparatus using the same title | |
US20040203762A1 (en) | Operating an ad-hoc wireless network in one or more regulatory regions | |
US9432869B2 (en) | Intra-frequency and inter-frequency measurements in a radio communication system | |
US6718171B1 (en) | Robust and efficient reacquisition after call release | |
JP2003061158A (en) | Cellular phone and cell search method used for the phone | |
US6119002A (en) | Mobile station having methods and apparatus for performing neighbor channel measurements from analog control channel | |
US6295290B1 (en) | Telecommunications systems | |
EP0522885A2 (en) | Method and arrangement of detecting control channel in mobile communications system | |
CN113179542A (en) | Wireless communication circuit and wireless communication method | |
KR100592904B1 (en) | Mobile communication system for providing handover based on dynamic cluster, and method thereof |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MOTOROLA, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BINZEL, CHARLES PHILIPP;REEL/FRAME:013216/0127 Effective date: 20020815 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC, ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MOTOROLA, INC;REEL/FRAME:025673/0558 Effective date: 20100731 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, ILLINOIS Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:029216/0282 Effective date: 20120622 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC;REEL/FRAME:034343/0001 Effective date: 20141028 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |