US1852710A - Antenna coupling system - Google Patents

Description

April 5, 1932. L. A. HAZELTINE 1,352,710

' ANTENNA COUPLING SYSTEM Filed Nov. 4, 1930 INVEANTOR law; A l/azofz'n BY flwa bmjllm M W. I ATTCRNEY Patented Apr. 5, 1932 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE LOUIS ALAN HAZEL'IINE, OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA, ASSIGNOR TO HAZELTINE COR- PORA'IION, A CORPORATION OF DELAWARE ANTENNA COUPLING SYSTEM Application filed November 4, 1930. Serial No. 493,370.

This invention relates to electric coupling circuit arrangements for coupling a receiving capacity-type antenna to a thermionic tube, particularly a thermionic tube constituting the first stage of a multistage tuned radio-frequency amplifier in which all stages are tuned by variable condensers mechanically'connected by a single control.

More especially the invention is directed toward improvements in antenna coupling circuits of the type disclosed in a copending application of Wm. A. MacDonald Serial No. 280,464 filed May 25, 1928, wherein the antenna is coupled to a thermionic tube by 13 means of a transformer having a tunable secondary coil and a primary coil coupled thereto having sufficient inductance so that it resonates with the capacity of an average antenna at a frequency slightly below the '10 tunable frequency range in order to increase the response at the lower tuned frequencies,

and thereby offset to a desired extent the factors normally operative in the well known manner to produce an increase in response '3 as the frequency of tuning is increased.

The consideration which limits the voltage step-up ration (amplification) obtainable between primary and secondary circuits of the coupling transformer, is in general, the detunin e'fl'ect of the primarycircuit upon the secon ary circuit when antennas are employed having capacities differing widely from that of the average antenna. Since any change in antenna capacityfrom the average value is reflected into the secondary circuit by virtue of the primary-to-secondary coupling effects, it is necessary that the effective coupling between transformer windings be made sufl'iciently small so that the detuning m effect of the antenna is negligible. The effectiveboupling however should not be reduced any further than is-required to effect this end, since an unnecessary loss in amplification would result.

When antennas are used which have. great- On the other hand this maximum value of er than average capacity, (the present invention not being employed) the resonance frequency of the primary circuit is reduced and thereby removed further from the tuning range of the receiver. The detuning effect therefore of a larger than average antenna capacity, or even of a short-circuit across the primary winding of the coupling transformer, is relatively small. When antennas are employed having less than average capacity, the resonance frequency of the primary circuit-approaches the tuning range, and in some cases-even falls withinthe range, in which event the detuning efl'ect tends to become very large.

It is one of the primary objects of the present invention to avoid such a contingency by the addition of a resistance in shunt to the input terminals of the coupling transformer primary winding. The maximum value of this resistance is chosen sufficiently large to have negligible effect on the performance of the circuit for antennas having average or greater than average capacity.

shunt resistance is chosen sufliciently small so that it serves to prevent any sharp resonance effects in the primary circuit, (which normally is resonant at about the lowest frequency of the tuning range) when the antenna has less than average capacity.- In this way the detuning effects reflected into the secondary circuit of the coupling transformer which aredue to variations in the antenna capacity, can be held within as close limits as required in order to permit unicontrol tuning in the case of a multi-stage tuned radio-frequency amplifier coupled to the antenna circuit.

Another important function of the resistance connected, in accordance with this invention, in shunt to the primary winding of the coupling transformer, is to limit the response at the resonant frequency of the primary circuit when the antenna capacity is such as to produce resonance within or slightly below the tunable frequency range,

since otherwise the antenna coupling circuit would be unduly responsive at the lower frequencies of tuning.

The shunt resistance can be very conveniently made in the form of a variable resistor or potentiometer serving to variably couple the antenna circuit to the input of the cou-' pling transformer, in this way providinga manually operable volume control for adjusting the intensity or attenuation of the received signal. This dualistic function of the shunt resistance constitutes a second important object of this invention.

To attain the full advantages of this invention, the self-inductance of the coupling transformer primary winding, the coefficient of coupling between the primary and secondary windings, and the magnitude of the resistance shunting the primary winding, should have values which are related to the frequency, to the antenna capacity and to the constants of the tuned secondary circuit in accordance with rules stated below.

Referring to the drawings:

Fig. 1 shows schematically a multi-stage tuned radio-frequency receiving system con-' nected to an antenna by means of a coupling circuit in accordance with this invention, wherein the resistance in shunt to the coupling transformer primary winding is fixed;

Fig. 2 shows a modification of the invention as applied to a multi-stage uni-controlled tuned radio-frequency receiving system wherein the resistance in shunt to the antenna coupling transformer primary winding is shown in the form of a potentiometer variably coupling the antenna circuit to the receiver input;

Figs. 3, 4 and 5 show other schemes, interchangeable with the antenna coupling system of Fig. 2, of employing a variable resistor or a potentiometer for variably coupling the antenna circuit to the transformer primary winding, which attain the objects of this invention.-

In Fig. 1 the coupling system consist-s of a transformer T having a primary coil L and secondary coil L The primary coil is connected in parallel with the resistor 1'... between antenna A and ground G, the capacity beween antenna and ground being denoted by C... The primary coil is magnetically coupled to the secondary L the latter being connected in parallel with the tuning condenser C, between grid and cathode of a thermionic tube V.

This circuit may be employed by itself, in case it is simply designed to have a coupling system whose tuning adjustment may be calibrated independently of the antenna constants, or else it may be followed by other tuned amplifying stages, either with separate tuning controls or a single tuning control.

In the circuit of Fig. 1, however tube V is indicated as constituting the first stage of a multi-stage tuned radio-frequency receiving system, the succeeding stages of which, as well as the detector and audio-frequency amplifying stages, are indicated by the rectangle B, the output of which is connected to a loud speaker H. The condenser O is mechanically coupled to the corresponding condensers of the succeeding radio-frequency amplifying stages by means of the uni-control element U. I

The circuit arrangement for the radio-frequency amplifying stages is shown in detail in Fig. 2 wherein the successive tubes V to V inclusive, of a multi-stage tuned radio-frequency thermionic receiving system are inter-connected by means of high-frequency transformers T and T the antenna circuit A being coupled to the first tube V by means of transformer 'l'. The transformer secondary windings L are tunable throughout a range in frequency by means of the associated variable condensers C havin their rotor elements mechanically coupled means of the uni-control element U. Tube V arranged to operate as a detector, is connected through an audio-frequency amplifier B to a loud speaker H. The grid-to-anode capacities of tubes V and V are-neutralized as shown in the drawings in accordance with the methods disclosed in my U. S. Patent No. 1,533,858 granted April 14, 1925. Instead of employing neutralized three'elect-rode tubes,

as in this figure, it is sometimes desirable to use tubes having other means for suppressing the effects of interelectrode capacity coupling such as the screen grid of a four-electrode tube as in the remaining figures.

The resistance 1, in shunt to the primary Winding L of transformer T is arranged in the form of a potentiometer with the antenna A connected to the variable tap for controlling the signal intensity impressed upon the receiver input. 3

The inductance of the antenna coupling transformer primary winding L.,, in order to accomplish the results of the present invention, is made greater than or at least equal to that of the secondary winding L The following notation. will be employed in adetailed description of a preferred embodiment of the antenna coupling circuit:

angular frequency of signal, radians per micro-second;

E signal voltage impressed upon the antenna, volts;

E voltage developed across secondary winding L volts;

O antenna capacity, millimicrofarads;

C secondary circuit tuning capacity, millimicrofarads;

. p ratio of total conductance of second- L" =L (1 lc self-inductance of secondary coil as measured with primary coil in place and short-circuited, millihenries;

1' resistance shunting primary kilohms.

The value L should be so chosen that L is equal to the self-inductances L and L of the succeeding secondary coils T and T; respectively. That is, the self-inductance of the antenna transformer secondary winding is made larger than that of the interstage transformer secondary windings in accordcoil,

ance with the equation The value of C is made equal to the'capacity C and C of the succeeding tuning con-- densers at all setting of the tuning control U, i. e. all tuning condensers are made identical. Under these conditions, and assuming that the tunihg control is adjusted so that the interstage coupling circuits are in exact resonance at a desired frequency a), i. e., so

that

1 I t s 2,5 03L; 032L322 x3 :3

the voltage step-up ratio of the antenna coupling system is: i

ma /Tau,

in tune, the deviation from exact resonance is too slight to cause a serious departure from the peak of the resonance curve when the conaccount in the above equation.

The effective width of the frequency band co ered by the antenna coupling system exceeds that covered by the secondary circuit L.C.- alone, in tlie ratio of the above denomilowing nat or to its value when lc=0; that is, in the ratio This ratio is greatest when the antenna circuit is in resonance (MOLLQ; 1) its value then being Now it will be observed that the factors to and C occurring 1n the numerator of equation (2) indicate a tendency for a low value of voltage step-up ratio at low tuned frequencies and large antenna capacities. In order to increase the response under such conditions, the denominator of equation (2) must be kept as small as possible which can be accomplished by making Md L of the order of unity at the lowest value of w to be used.

Then the first parenthesis (MG 1) of the denominator of equation (2) will be approximately zero at the lower frequencies of tuning for all values of antenna capacity up to and slightly less than that of the average antenna. Under these conditions, the voltage step-up ratio will be highest when the second parenthesis in the denominator of equation (2) is also of the order of unity. In this parenthesis the term all Y lowers the step-up ratio, but by equation (4) it also keeps the frequency .band' from being too greatly widened. A value of the order of one-third to one-seventh at the lowest frequency of tuning represents a suitable compromise, which is sufliciently high to prevent excessive response at the resonance frequency of the antenna circuit when the secondary circuit L G is tuned to a different frequency.

The results derived from an analysis of the above equations may be embodied in the folrules:

(I) The self-inductance of the primary coil L should be so chosen that it resonates with the, capacity of an average antenna-at about the lowest frequency to which the system is to be tuned, preferably at a frequency which is slightly lower than the lowesttuned frequency.

(II) The coupling coefficients between the primary and secondary circuits of the antenna coupling system should be of the order of somewhat less than the square root of the natural power factorof the secondary circuit.

(III) The resistance r. shunting the priterminal of coil L variably tapped to the resistance r...

In Fig. 4 the'resistance r, is at all times bridged across'the coil L with the antenna connected to the upper terminal of the resistance and the ground G variably tapped thereto. The modification of Fig. 5 differs from that of Fig. 4 by strapping the lower terminal of resistance 1-,, to ground G, so that the portion of the resistance up to the variable tap is short circuited.

. Capacitive coupling, which may be inherent or added in the form of acondenser between the primary and secondarytransformer coils can eitheradd to-or subtract from the magnetic coupling, as described in the MacDonald application previously referred to. Rule (I'I), above, gives the total coupling at the lowestffrequency, which is practically all magnetic coupling. With moderate additive capacitive coupling, the voltage step-up ratio at higher frequencies will be improved, except with very small antenna capacities; but the added capacitive coupling at its greatest value (lowest C and lowest Gs) should not exceed the order of magnitude of the magnetic coupling.

The following values are suitable for broadcast reception as employed in the United States (0.55 to 1.5 cycles per microsecond) and illustrate the above rules:

0' 0.2 millimicrofarads, average antenna;

p. 0.01 I L 0.2 millihenries I a) =21r X 0.55 3.46 radians per microsecond;

Then

L',,= =0.419 millihenry k 0.8,511 0.8,IW1 0.08 r 5wL 5 X 3.46 X 0.419 7.23 kilohms k ,=0.2013 millihenries.

Using these values for the constants, the voltage amplification, by equation (2), lies between-.6 and a little over 8 throughout the broadcast band of frequencies.

included in the resonant primary circuit L5G thereby reducing the selectivity and otherwise introducing a detuning action due to the primary circuit impedance reflected into the tuned secondary circuit L C This latter objection also applies to the Fig. 4 showing.

Fig. 5 is thus the preferred embodiment wherein the adjustable contact is always at ground potential, the resistance 1'. regardless of the adjustment thereof being at alltimes entirely in shunt to the primary circuit L C With this arrangement it is obvious that adjustment of the contact arm to an intermediate point has an inappreciable effect upon the tuning of the secondary circuit.

What is claimed is: 1. A high-frequency coupling circuit tunable throughout a frequency range and adapted primarily for coupling a capacity type antenna tojthe input of a thermionic tube, comprising, a tunable secondary circuit having coupled thereto a primary circuit including inductance sufficient to resonate with a certain antenna capacity at a frequency fixed at about the lowest frequency of said tunable range, and shunt resistance associated with said primary circuit sufiiciently high in maximum magnitude to have an inappreciable effect upon the operation of said coupling circuit when connected to an antenna having said certain capacity, said magnitude being sufficiently low to prevent serious detuning for a given frequency adjustment of said tunable secondary circuit when said primary circuit is connected to anantenna of less than said certain capacity.

2. A high-frequency coupling circuit tunable throughout a frequency range and adapted primarily for coupling a capacity type antenna to the input of a thermionic tube comprising, a tunable secondary circuit having coupled thereto a primary circuit including inductance suflicient to resonate with the capacity of said antenna at a frequency fixed at about the lowest frequency of said tunable range, resistance connected in shunt to said primary circuit having a maximum magnitude of the order of three to seven times the reactancc of said primary-circuit inductance at the lowest frequency of said tuning range.

3. A high-frequency coupling circuit tunable throughout a frequency range and adapted primarily for coupling a capacity type antenna to the input of a thermionic tube, comprising, a tunable secondary circuit including inductance and capacity, having coupled thereto a primary circuit including inductance suflicient to resonate with the capacity of said antenna at a frequency fixed at about the lowest frequency of said tunable range, and shunt resistance associated with said primary circuit, the coupling coeflicient between said primary and secondary circuits being of the order of somewhat less than the square root of the natural power factor of said secondary circuit.

4. A high-frequency circuit tunable throughout a frequency range and adapted primarily for coupling a capacity type antenna circuit to the input of av thermionic tube, comprising, a transformer having a secondary coil tunable by means of an associated variable capacity, and a primary coil coupled to said secondary and having an inductance sufficient to resonate with the capacity of said antenna circuit at a frequency fixed at about the lowest frequency of said tunable range, and a resistance in shunt to said primary coil, the coupling coeflicient between said primary and secondary coils being of the order of the natural power factor of the tunable secondary circuit, the maximum value of said resistance being of the order of three to seventimes the reactance of said primary coil at the lowest frequency of said range.

5. A high-frequency coupling circuit tunable throughout a frequency range and adapted primarily for coupling a capacity type antenna circuit to theinput of a thermionic tube, comprising, a tunable secondary circuit including variable capacity and a secondary transformer coil having magnetically coupled thereto a primary coil of inductance suflicient to resonate with a certain antenna capacity at a frequency fixed at about the lowest frequency of said tunable range, and resistance connected in shunt to said primary coil of a maximum magnitude sufiiciently large to have an inappreciable effect upon the operation of said coupling circuit when connected to an antenna having said certain capacity, said magnitude being sufliciently small to prevent serious detuning for a given capacity settingiof said tunable secondary circuit when said primary coil is connected to an antenna having less than said certain capacity.

6. A high-frequency coupling circuit adapted primarily for coupling a capacity type antenna to the input of a thermionic tube, comprising, a transformer having a secondary coil tunable throughout a frequency range by an associated variable capacity, and a primary coil of inductance sufiicient to resonate with the capacity of an average antenna at a frequency fixed at about the lowest frequency of said tunable range, and a variable resistance in shunt to said primary coil and connected to variably couple an antenna circuit to said primary coil,

the coupling coeflicient between said primary and secondary coils being of the order of somewhat less than the square root of the natural power factor of the tunable secondary circuit, said resistance at the ma rimum setting having a magnitude sufficiently large to produce an inappreciable effect upon the operation of-the said coupling circuit when connected to an antenna having said

Images