US11287819B2 - Systems and methods for ground plane estimation - Google Patents
Systems and methods for ground plane estimation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US11287819B2 US11287819B2 US16/596,006 US201916596006A US11287819B2 US 11287819 B2 US11287819 B2 US 11287819B2 US 201916596006 A US201916596006 A US 201916596006A US 11287819 B2 US11287819 B2 US 11287819B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- robotic device
- ground plane
- plane estimation
- ground
- ground surface
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/0088—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots characterized by the autonomous decision making process, e.g. artificial intelligence, predefined behaviours
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B62—LAND VEHICLES FOR TRAVELLING OTHERWISE THAN ON RAILS
- B62D—MOTOR VEHICLES; TRAILERS
- B62D57/00—Vehicles characterised by having other propulsion or other ground- engaging means than wheels or endless track, alone or in addition to wheels or endless track
- B62D57/02—Vehicles characterised by having other propulsion or other ground- engaging means than wheels or endless track, alone or in addition to wheels or endless track with ground-engaging propulsion means, e.g. walking members
- B62D57/032—Vehicles characterised by having other propulsion or other ground- engaging means than wheels or endless track, alone or in addition to wheels or endless track with ground-engaging propulsion means, e.g. walking members with alternately or sequentially lifted supporting base and legs; with alternately or sequentially lifted feet or skid
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/0006—Exoskeletons, i.e. resembling a human figure
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1615—Programme controls characterised by special kind of manipulator, e.g. planar, scara, gantry, cantilever, space, closed chain, passive/active joints and tendon driven manipulators
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1694—Programme controls characterised by use of sensors other than normal servo-feedback from position, speed or acceleration sensors, perception control, multi-sensor controlled systems, sensor fusion
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1694—Programme controls characterised by use of sensors other than normal servo-feedback from position, speed or acceleration sensors, perception control, multi-sensor controlled systems, sensor fusion
- B25J9/1697—Vision controlled systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/08—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw
- G05D1/0891—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted for land vehicles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/20—Control system inputs
- G05D1/22—Command input arrangements
- G05D1/228—Command input arrangements located on-board unmanned vehicles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/60—Intended control result
- G05D1/69—Coordinated control of the position or course of two or more vehicles
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S901/00—Robots
- Y10S901/01—Mobile robot
Definitions
- Robotic devices may be used for many applications, and may operate in a variety of environments. Such robotic devices may need to operate in environments with a sloped ground, an environment with rocky terrain, or various other uneven landscapes. In such environments, the robotic device may need to know the slope of the ground to maintain balance and to progress forward. Such robotic devices may include systems to estimate a flat-plane approximation of the shape of the ground on which the robotic devices are walking in order to move across such terrains.
- the present application discloses embodiments that relate to ground plane estimation for robotic devices.
- the present application describes a method operable by a computing device.
- the method may include determining an orientation of a body of a robotic device with respect to a gravity aligned reference frame.
- the method may also include determining the location of one or more contact points between the robotic device and a ground surface.
- the method may also include determining, by one or more processors of the computing device, a ground plane estimation of the ground surface based on the determined orientation of the robotic device with respect to the gravity aligned reference frame and the determined location of the one or more contact points between the robotic device and the ground surface, wherein the ground plane estimation includes a flat-plane approximation of a shape of the ground surface.
- the method may also include determining a distance between the body of the robotic device and the determined ground plane estimation.
- the method may also include providing instructions, by the one or more processors, to adjust a position and/or orientation of some part of the robotic device based on the determined distance and the determined ground plane estimation.
- the present application discloses a robotic device.
- the robotic device may include a body, two or more legs extending from the body, at least one processor, and data storage comprising program logic executable by the at least one processor to cause the robotic device to perform functions.
- the functions may include determining an orientation of the body of the robotic device with respect to a gravity aligned reference frame.
- the functions may also include determining the location of one or more contact points between the robotic device and a ground surface.
- the functions may also include determining a ground plane estimation of the ground surface based on the determined orientation of the robotic device with respect to the gravity aligned reference frame and the determined location of the one or more contact points between the robotic device and the ground surface, wherein the ground plane estimation includes a flat-plane approximation of a shape of the ground surface.
- the functions may also include determining a distance between the body of the robotic device and the determined ground plane estimation.
- the functions may also include providing instructions to adjust a position of the robotic device based on the determined distance and the determined ground plane estimation.
- the present application discloses a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions, that when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to carry out functions.
- the functions may include determining an orientation of a body of a robotic device with respect to a gravity aligned reference frame.
- the functions may also include determining the location of one or more contact points between the robotic device and the ground surface.
- the functions may also include determining a ground plane estimation of the ground surface based on the determined orientation of the robotic device with respect to the gravity aligned reference frame and the determined location of the one or more contact points between the robotic device and the ground surface, wherein the ground plane estimation includes a flat-plane approximation of a shape of the ground surface.
- the functions may also include determining a distance between the body of the robotic device and the determined ground plane estimation.
- the functions may also include providing instructions to adjust a position of the robotic device based on the determined distance and the determined ground plane estimation.
- FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram illustrating a robotic device, according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an example method.
- FIGS. 3A-3D illustrate an example system configured to perform functions of the example method, in accordance with at least some embodiments described herein.
- FIG. 4 illustrates another example system configured to perform functions of the example method, in accordance with at least some embodiments described herein.
- FIG. 5 depicts a computer-readable medium configured according to an example embodiment.
- Example methods and systems are described herein. It should be understood that the words “example,” “exemplary,” and “illustrative” are used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment or feature described herein as being an “example,” being “exemplary,” or being “illustrative” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or features.
- the example embodiments described herein are not meant to be limiting. It will be readily understood that the aspects of the present disclosure, as generally described herein, and illustrated in the figures, can be arranged, substituted, combined, separated, and designed in a wide variety of different configurations, all of which are explicitly contemplated herein.
- a legged robotic device may need to know the slope and location of the ground to maintain balance and forward progress.
- Such robotic devices may include systems to estimate a flat-plane approximation of the shape of the ground on which the robots are walking in order to locomote on inclined terrain.
- Inputs to such a ground plane estimation system may include a robot pose and the location of contact points between the robotic device and the ground plane.
- the robot pose may include a position and orientation of the robotic device.
- the position of the robot may be relative to points of the robot in contact with the ground or to some other reference.
- the orientation of the robot is normally estimated using information from an inertial measurement unit (IMU), including accelerators and/or gyroscopes.
- IMU inertial measurement unit
- Contact points are discrete points in three-dimensional (3D) space that the robotic device, or control system of the robotic device, has computed and determined are likely on the ground. A determination of whether a point is on the ground can be based on sensor information and/or the context of the state of the robot controller. Contact points may be current (a latest value computed) or historical (computed based on a past measurements). In order to use historical points, the robotic device may keep track of how much the robotic device has moved since the historic point location was last contacted. In an example case, point locations are computed using joint positions and a pose of the robotic device. For example, the robotic device may use points on its hands, feet, or knees that are estimated or believed to be on the ground.
- Contact points also may be virtual points, or generated based on non-contact sensors systems, such as stereo vision or laser range finders looking ahead of the robotic device. Virtual contact points often provide advanced notice about terrain the robotic device has not physically contacted yet. Contact points may also be created based on suggestions by a robotic device operator.
- the robotic device may be configured to combine the measurements from the IMU with the discrete contact points to estimate the slope of the ground plane on which the robotic device is operating.
- the robotic device may be further configured to adjust its position and/or orientation based on the determined ground plane, so as to better position itself for further movement.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a functional block diagram illustrating a robotic device 100 , according to an example embodiment.
- the robotic device 100 may include various subsystems such as a mechanical system 120 , a sensing system 130 , a control system 140 , as well as a power supply 150 .
- the robotic device 100 may include more or fewer subsystems and each subsystem could include multiple elements. Further, each of the subsystems and elements of robotic device 100 could be interconnected. Thus, one or more of the described functions of the robotic device 100 may be divided up into additional functional or physical components, or combined into fewer functional or physical components. In some further examples, additional functional and/or physical components may be added to the examples illustrated by FIG. 1 .
- the mechanical system 120 may include several components, including a body 102 , one or more robotic legs 104 , and one or more robotic feet 106 coupled to the one or more robotic legs 104 .
- the mechanical system 120 may additionally include a motor 108 , which may be an electric motor powered by electrical power, or may be powered by a number of different energy sources, such as a gas-based fuel or solar power. Additionally, motor 108 may be configured to receive power from power supply 150 .
- the power supply 150 may provide power to various components of robotic device 100 and could represent, for example, a rechargeable lithium-ion or lead-acid battery. In an example embodiment, one or more banks of such batteries could be configured to provide electrical power. Other power supply materials and types are also possible.
- the sensing system 130 may determine information about the environment that can be used by control system 140 (e.g., a computing device running motion planning software) to determine a ground plane estimation of the ground surface on which the robotic device 100 operates.
- the control system 140 could be located on the robotic device 100 or could be in remote communication with the robotic device 100 .
- the sensing system 130 may use one or more body-mounted sensors 110 attached to the body 102 of the robotic device 100 , which may be 2D sensors and/or 3D depth sensors that sense information about the environment as the robotic device 100 moves.
- the body-mounted sensors 110 may determine a distance between the body 102 of the robotic device 100 and the ground surface on which the robotic device 100 operates.
- one or more robotic leg sensors 112 may be located on the robotic legs 104 of the robotic device 100 .
- the robotic leg sensors 112 may be contact sensors configured to alert the robotic device when the robotic legs 104 are in contact with the ground surface.
- the robotic legs 104 may be coupled to robotic feet 106 that contact the ground surface.
- the robotic device 100 may include one or more robotic feet sensors 114 positioned on the robotic feet 106 of the robotic device 100 .
- the robotic feet sensors 114 may be contact sensors configured to alert the robotic device 100 when the robotic feet 106 are in contact with the ground surface.
- the information from the robotic legs sensors 112 and/or the robotic feet sensors 114 may be used to estimate a ground plane of the ground surface on which the robotic device 100 operates, as discussed in more detail below.
- the sensing system 130 may further include an IMU 116 .
- IMU 116 may include both a set of accelerometers and a gyroscope, which may be used together to determine the orientation, position, and/or velocity of the robotic device 100 .
- the accelerometer can measure the orientation of the robotic device 100 with respect to gravity, while the gyroscope measures the rate of rotation around an axis.
- IMUs are commercially available in low-cost, low-power packages.
- an IMU 116 may take the form of or include a miniaturized MicroElectroMechanical System (MEMS) or a NanoElectroMechanical System (NEMS). Other types of IMUs may also be utilized.
- MEMS MicroElectroMechanical System
- NEMS NanoElectroMechanical System
- An IMU 116 may include other sensors, in addition to accelerometers and gyroscopes, which may help to better determine position and/or help to increase autonomy of the robotic device 100 .
- sensors Two examples of such sensors are magnetometers and pressure sensors. Other examples are also possible.
- the sensing system 130 may also include a non-contact sensor system 118 configured to determine virtual contact points in front of the robotic device 100 .
- the virtual contact points may represent an estimation of a future contact point based on a current position and current velocity of the robotic device 100 .
- the non-contact sensor system 118 may include a RADAR unit that utilizes radio signals to determine the virtual contact points.
- the non-contact sensor system 118 may include a laser rangefinder/LIDAR unit configure to determine virtual contact points using lasers.
- the laser rangefinder/LIDAR unit may include one or more laser sources, a laser scanner, and one or more detectors, among other system components.
- the laser rangefinder/LIDAR unit can be configured to operate in a coherent (e.g., using heterodyne detection) or an incoherent detection mode.
- the non-contact sensor system 118 may include a vision system including one or more cameras mounted on the robotic device 100 .
- An example camera can be a photo-sensitive instrument, such as a still camera, a video camera, etc., that is configured to capture a plurality of images of the environment of the robotic device 100 .
- the camera can be configured to detect visible light, and can additionally or alternatively be configured to detect light from other portions of the spectrum, such as infrared or ultraviolet light.
- the camera can be a two-dimensional detector, and can optionally have a three-dimensional spatial range of sensitivity.
- the camera can include, for example, a range detector configured to generate a two-dimensional image indicating distance from the camera to a number of points in the environment. To this end, the camera may use one or more range detecting techniques.
- the camera can provide range information by using a structured light technique in which the robotic device 100 illuminates an object in the environment with a predetermined light pattern, such as a grid or checkerboard pattern and uses the camera to detect a reflection of the predetermined light pattern from environmental surroundings. Based on distortions in the reflected light pattern, the robotic device can determine the distance to the points on the object.
- the predetermined light pattern may comprise infrared light, or radiation at other suitable wavelengths for such measurements.
- Control system 140 may include at least one processor 120 (which could include at least one microprocessor) that executes instructions 122 stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium, such as the memory 124 .
- the control system 140 may also represent a plurality of computing devices that may serve to control individual components or subsystems of the robotic device 100 in a distributed fashion.
- memory 124 may contain instructions 122 (e.g., program logic) executable by the processor 120 to execute various functions of robotic device 100 , including those described below in relation to FIG. 2 .
- Memory 124 may contain additional instructions as well, including instructions to transmit data to, receive data from, interact with, and/or control one or more of the mechanical system 120 , the sensor system 130 , and/or the control system 140 .
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart of an example method for determining a ground plane estimation of a ground surface on which a robotic device operates, in accordance with at least some embodiments described herein.
- Method 200 shown in FIG. 2 presents an embodiment of a method that, for example, could be used with the systems shown in FIG. 1 , for example, or may be performed by a combination of any components of in FIG. 1 .
- Method 200 may include one or more operations, functions, or actions as illustrated by one or more of blocks 202 - 210 . Although the blocks are illustrated in a sequential order, these blocks may in some instances be performed in parallel, and/or in a different order than those described herein. Also, the various blocks may be combined into fewer blocks, divided into additional blocks, and/or removed based upon the desired implementation.
- each block may represent a module, a segment, or a portion of program code, which includes one or more instructions executable by a processor for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process.
- the program code may be stored on any type of computer readable medium, for example, such as a storage device including a disk or hard drive.
- the computer readable medium may include a non-transitory computer readable medium, for example, such as computer-readable media that stores data for short periods of time like register memory, processor cache and Random Access Memory (RAM).
- the computer readable medium may also include non-transitory media, such as secondary or persistent long term storage, like read only memory (ROM), optical or magnetic disks, compact-disc read only memory (CD-ROM), for example.
- the computer readable media may also be any other volatile or non-volatile storage systems.
- the computer readable medium may be considered a computer readable storage medium, a tangible storage device, or other article of manufacture, for example.
- each block in FIG. 2 may represent circuitry that is wired to perform the specific logical functions in the process.
- Functions of the method 200 may be fully performed by a computing device, or may be distributed across multiple computing devices and/or a server.
- the computing device may be incorporated into a robotic device, or the computing device may be an independent component in wireless communication with the robotic device.
- the computing device may receive information from sensors or other components coupled to the computing device, or where the computing device is a server the information can be received from another device that collects the information.
- the computing device could further communicate with a server to determine information that may facilitate the performance of the method 200 .
- the method 200 includes determining an orientation of a body of a robotic device with respect to a gravity aligned reference frame.
- the gravity aligned reference frame may be a fixed reference frame that is normally aligned with the gravity vector.
- the robotic device may include a sensing system including an IMU.
- the IMU may include accelerometers and a gyroscope, as examples.
- the IMU may be configured to output data for determining the orientation of the robotic device.
- One or more processors of the robotic device may receive the data from the IMU, and make a determination of the current orientation of the robotic device.
- the IMU may detect the current rate of acceleration using one or more accelerometers, and may further detect changes in rotational attributes like pitch, roll, and yaw using one or more gyroscopes.
- the method 200 includes determining the location of one or more contact points between the robotic device and the ground surface.
- contact points are discrete points in three-dimensional space that the robotic device, or control system of the robotic device, has computed and determined are likely on the ground.
- a determination of whether a point is on the ground be based on sensor information and/or the context of the state of the robot controller.
- the robotic device may include one or more legs used to support a body.
- a bottom surface of the one or more legs may include sensors configured to indicate when the legs are touching the ground surface.
- one or more feet may be coupled to the one or more legs of the robotic device.
- the one or more feet may include sensors configured to indicate when the feet are touching the ground surface.
- Each of the one or more feet may have one or more sensors, designed to indicate a given set of contact points.
- contact points may be current (a latest value computed) or historical (computed based on a past measurements).
- Current contact points include information from one or more sensors located on the one or more feet and/or legs of the robotic device, as discussed above.
- Historical contact points include contact points stored in the memory or data storage of the robotic device, that may be used when the robotic device cannot compute current contact points, or an insufficient number of current contact points are available to calculate a ground plane estimation.
- the robotic device may keep track of a distance the robotic device has moved since the contact point was previously determined. The robotic device may then use the distance traveled to determine whether the previously determined contact point may be used for a current ground plane estimation.
- the robotic device may discard the contact point as irrelevant. However, if the distance traveled since the contact point was determined does not exceed the threshold distance, the contact point may still be relevant to estimate the ground plane of the ground surface on which the robotic device operates.
- contact points may be computed using joint positions and the determined orientation of the robotic device.
- the robotic device may be geometrically calibrated.
- the robotic device may have one or more legs, including one or more knee joints and one or more feet.
- Each of the components may have known geometric features, such as length, width and height, that are stored in the memory or data storage of the robotic device.
- the robotic device may determine contact points based on the determined orientation of the robotic device and the known position of the components of the robotic device.
- contact points may be virtual points, generated based on a non-contact sensor system, such as a stereo vision system and/or laser rangefinder/LIDAR, as discussed above in relation to FIG. 1 .
- the stereo vision system and/or or laser rangefinder/LIDAR system may be configured to detect a ground surface in front of the robotic device.
- the non-contact sensor system may be configured to detect a ground surface approximately two meters from the robotic device.
- Virtual contact points represent estimation of a future contact point based on a current position and current velocity of the robotic device. Virtual contact points may provide advanced notice about terrain the robotic device has not physically contacted yet.
- the contact points may include a combination of contact points from the one or more sensors and virtual contact points from the non-contact sensor system.
- the robotic device may solely use contact points from the one or more sensors if there are three or more contact points. However, if there are less than three contact points from the one or more sensors, the robotic device may use virtual contact points from the non-contact sensor system.
- the robotic device may use virtual contact points if the robotic device is traveling at a velocity that exceeds a threshold velocity. In such a case, it may be particularly advantageous to provide advanced notice about terrain the robotic device has not physically contacted yet. Other examples are possible as well.
- the contact points may be weighted to represent the relative confidence of each of the determined contact points.
- the processor of the computing device may determine a weight coefficient for a given contact point based on a number of factors. For example, current contact points from the one or more sensors of the robotic device may be weighted more heavily than historical contact points or virtual contact points. As another example, historical contact points may be weighted based on the amount of time that has elapsed since the contact point was originally determined. In such an example, the longer the amount of time, the lower the weight coefficient. In a case where four or more contact points are detected, the robotic de may use the contact point weights in an optimization when estimating the ground plane of the ground surface Other examples are possible as well.
- a subset of those contact points may be filtered out of the ground plane estimation calculation.
- a spatial filter may remove contact points that are outside of a target region surround the robotic device's current position.
- historical contact points may be removed after a given time period to reduce error resulting from odometry drift.
- the robotic device control software may provide suggestions to condition the ground plane estimation.
- Some examples include contact point grouping, and reduced order output.
- Contact point grouping enables a collection of points to be averaged and treated as a single point. In certain cases, two or more contact points that are too close together will likely provide excessively noisy additional information for certain dimensions of a ground plane fit.
- One method to suppress this noise is to group these too-close contact points into a single, representative contact point, which itself provides all the salient (i.e. useable) geometric information, in a predictable way, for any subsequent ground plane estimation.
- the robotic device may group contact points to reduce the total number of contact points from four to three, in the event that two of the points are sufficiently close together. Other examples are possible as well.
- the method 200 includes determining a ground plane estimation of the ground surface based on the determined orientation of the robotic device with respect to gravity aligned reference frame and the determined location of the one or more contact points between the robotic device and the ground surface.
- the ground plane estimation is a flat-plane approximation of a shape of the ground surface.
- one or more processors of the computing device may receive information indicating the orientation of the body of the robotic device, as well as the information indicating the one or more contact points. The one or more processors of the robotic device may subsequently use the received information to estimate a ground plane on which the robotic device operates.
- the ground plane calculation may use any number of discrete contact points. When less than three contact points are available, the ground plane may be considered under-constrained. When there are exactly three non-collinear points the ground plane may be fully constrained. Further, when more than three non-collinear points are available, the ground plane may be considered over-constrained and optimization is used. Each of these cases is discussed in more detail below.
- the robotic device may detect zero contact points between the robotic device and the ground surface.
- the ground plane estimation may simply be the last ground plane determined by the robotic device.
- the robotic device may store previously determined ground plane estimations in its memory, for example.
- the robotic device may only store the previous ten ground plane estimations. When no contact points are available in a current position, the robotic device may make an assumption that the ground plane has not changed drastically since the last estimation, and may use the previous ground plane as an estimate for a current situation.
- the robotic device may detect one contact point between the robotic device and the ground surface.
- the robotic device may determine the ground plane estimation of the ground surface by determining a plane including the one contact point that is parallel to the previously determined ground plane. Further, the position and orientation of the robotic device are used to compute the position and orientation of the ground plane relative to the robotic device.
- the robotic device may detect two contact points between the robotic device and the ground surface.
- the robotic device may determine a normal vector of a previously determined ground plane estimation.
- the normal vector is defined as the vector perpendicular to the previously determined ground plane estimation.
- the robotic device may subsequently project the normal vector of the previously determined ground plane estimation to be perpendicular to a line connecting the two contact points, such that the projected normal vector is perpendicular to the new ground plane estimation.
- the robotic device may detect three contact points between the robotic device and the ground surface. In such an example, the robotic device may determine the ground plane estimation by determining a plane including each of the three contact points.
- the robotic device may detect four or more contact points between the robotic device and the ground surface. In such an example, the robotic device may determine a ground plane that minimizes the square distance between each of the four or more contact points and the ground plane. In another example, the square distance between each contact point and the desired ground plane may be weighted as discussed above. Other examples are possible as well.
- Signal processing may be employed to condition the ground plane estimation.
- a low pass filter may be used to remove high-frequency content from the ground plane estimate.
- the robotic device may determine a confidence score based on how well contact points fit the ground plane estimate. For example, if the determined locations of the contact points are close to being in a line, the robotic device may determine that the resulting ground plane estimation has a low confidence score. In another example, if the determined locations of the contact points are spread out, the robotic device may determine that the resulting ground plane estimation has a high confidence score. In cases where the ground plane estimate is below a threshold confidence score, the robotic device may freeze the ground plane estimate at a past estimate with a higher confidence score.
- the method 200 includes determining a distance between the body of the robotic device and the determined ground plane estimation.
- the robotic device may determine the distance based on information from one or more sensors on the body of the robotic device.
- the robotic device may determine the distance based on the determined orientation of the body of the robotic device and a position of one or more legs of the robotic device.
- the robotic device may include stored information including the geometric properties of the one or more legs of the robotic device. The robotic device may then deters line the distance based on the determined orientation of the body of the robotic device and the known geometric properties of the one or more legs.
- the robotic device may further include current joint angle information for the one or more legs. In such an example, the robotic device may determine the distance based on the determined joint angle and the known geometric properties of the one or more legs.
- the distance between the body of the robotic device and the determined ground plane estimation may represent a height of the robotic device with respect to the ground plane.
- determining the distance between the body of the robotic device and the determined ground plane estimation may include determining an average distance.
- the robotic device may determine a first distance between the body of the robotic device and a first point on the determined ground plane estimation, and further determine a second distance between the body of the robotic device and a second point on the determined ground plane estimation. The robotic device may then average the first distance and the second distance to determine the distance between the body of the robotic device and the determined ground plane estimation.
- Other examples are possible as well.
- the method 200 includes providing instructions to adjust a position of the robotic device based on the determined distance and the determined ground plane estimation.
- one or more processors of the robotic device may provide instructions to position one or more legs of the robotic device such that a center of gravity projection of the robotic device is located within a polygon defined by the one or more legs of the robotic device.
- one or more processors of the robotic device may provide instructions to swing one or more feet of the robotic device parallel to the determined ground plane estimation to provide consistent ground clearance.
- one or more processors of the robotic device may provide instructions to orient one or more features of the body of the robotic device substantially parallel to the determined ground plane estimation, or at some other orientation relative to the ground plane estimation.
- the robotic device may further determine an orientation difference between the body of the robotic device and the determined ground plane estimation.
- the orientation difference may compare a current orientation of the body of the robotic device with respect to the gravity aligned reference frame, and the determined ground plane estimation.
- the robotic device may provide instructions to adjust the position of the robotic device based on the determined distance, the determined orientation difference, and the determined ground plane estimation.
- Other examples are possible as well.
- a ground plane estimation system may utilize a combination of a determined orientation of the robotic device and one or more contact points between the robotic device and a ground surface to determine a flat-plane approximation of the ground surface on which the robotic device operates.
- FIGS. 3A-3D illustrate the robotic device determining a ground plane estimation, according to an example embodiments.
- FIG. 3A illustrates an example embodiment when the robotic device 300 detects one contact point 302 A between the robotic device 300 and the ground surface.
- the robotic device 300 may determine the ground plane estimation 304 of the ground surface by determining a plane including the one contact point that is parallel to the previously determined ground plane 306 .
- FIG. 3B illustrates an example embodiment when the robotic device 300 detects two contact points 302 A, 302 B between the robotic device 300 and the ground surface.
- the robotic device 300 may determine a normal vector 308 of a previously determined ground plane estimation 306 .
- the robotic device 300 may subsequently project the normal vector 308 of the previously determined ground plane estimation 306 to be perpendicular to a line connecting the two contact points 302 A, 302 B, such that the projected normal vector 308 is perpendicular to the ground plane estimation 304 .
- FIG. 3C illustrates an example embodiment when the robotic device 300 detects three contact points 302 A- 302 C between the robotic device 300 and the ground surface.
- the robotic device 300 may determine the ground plane estimation 304 by determining a plane including each of the three contact points 302 A, 302 B, and 302 C.
- FIG. 3D illustrates an example embodiment when the robotic device 300 detects five contact points 302 A- 302 E between the robotic device 300 and the ground surface.
- the robotic device 300 may determine a ground plane that minimizes the sum of the square distance between each of the five contact points 302 A- 302 E and the ground plane.
- FIG. 4 illustrates another example robotic device 400 configured to perform functions of the example method, in accordance with at least some embodiments described herein.
- FIG. 4 illustrates an example bipedal robotic device 400 navigating over a rocky terrain 402 .
- the robotic device 400 includes two feet 404 A, 404 B coupled to two legs 406 A, 406 B.
- Each of the feet 404 A, 404 B include four contact points 408 A- 408 H.
- the contact points 408 A- 408 H may be used to estimate a ground plane 410 , using the methods described above.
- the robotic device 400 is shown having eight contact points 408 A- 408 H with the ground surface 402 .
- the robotic device 400 may determine a square distance between the eight contact points 408 A- 408 H, and may subsequently determine a ground plane 410 that minimizes the square distance between the eight contact points 408 A- 408 H.
- Other examples for estimating the ground plane are possible as well, as discussed above.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a computer-readable medium configured according to an example embodiment.
- the example system can include one or more processors, one or more forms of memory, one or more input devices/interfaces, one or more output devices/interfaces, and machine-readable instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the system to carry out the various functions, tasks, capabilities, etc., described above.
- FIG. 5 is a schematic illustrating a conceptual partial view of an example computer program product that includes a computer program for executing a computer process on a computing device, arranged according to at least some embodiments presented herein.
- the example computer program product 500 is provided using a signal bearing medium 502 .
- the signal bearing medium 502 may include one or more programming instructions 504 that, when executed by one or more processors may provide functionality or portions of the functionality described above with respect to FIGS. 1-4 .
- the signal bearing medium 502 can be a computer-readable medium 506 , such as, but not limited to, a hard disk drive, a Compact Disc (CD), a Digital Video Disk (DVD), a digital tape, memory, etc.
- the signal bearing medium 502 can be a computer recordable medium 508 , such as, but not limited to, memory, read/write (R/W) CDs, R/W DVDs, etc.
- the signal bearing medium 502 can be a communications medium 510 , such as, but not limited to, a digital and/or an analog communication medium (e.g., a fiber optic cable, a waveguide, a wired communications link, a wireless communication link, etc.).
- a communications medium 510 such as, but not limited to, a digital and/or an analog communication medium (e.g., a fiber optic cable, a waveguide, a wired communications link, a wireless communication link, etc.).
- the signal bearing medium 502 can be conveyed by a wireless form of the communications medium 510 .
- the one or more programming instructions 504 can be, for example, computer executable and/or logic implemented instructions.
- a computing device such as the processor 120 of FIG. 1 is configured to provide various operations, functions, or actions in response to the programming instructions 504 conveyed to the processor 120 by one or more of the computer-readable medium 506 , the computer recordable medium 508 , and/or the communications medium 510 .
- the non-transitory computer-readable medium could also be distributed among multiple data storage elements, which could be remotely located from each other.
- the device that executes some or all of the stored instructions could be a client-side computing device.
- the device that executes some or all of the stored instructions could be a server-side computing device.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Robotics (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
- Manipulator (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (24)
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/596,006 US11287819B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2019-10-08 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US17/652,103 US11921508B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2022-02-23 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US18/414,181 US20240152143A1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2024-01-16 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/339,860 US9259838B1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2014-07-24 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US14/988,913 US9804600B1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2016-01-06 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US15/723,881 US10496094B1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2017-10-03 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US16/596,006 US11287819B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2019-10-08 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/723,881 Continuation US10496094B1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2017-10-03 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/652,103 Continuation US11921508B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2022-02-23 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20200033860A1 US20200033860A1 (en) | 2020-01-30 |
US11287819B2 true US11287819B2 (en) | 2022-03-29 |
Family
ID=55275282
Family Applications (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/339,860 Active US9259838B1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2014-07-24 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US14/988,913 Active US9804600B1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2016-01-06 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US15/723,881 Active US10496094B1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2017-10-03 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US16/596,006 Active 2035-02-07 US11287819B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2019-10-08 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US17/652,103 Active US11921508B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2022-02-23 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US18/414,181 Pending US20240152143A1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2024-01-16 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/339,860 Active US9259838B1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2014-07-24 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US14/988,913 Active US9804600B1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2016-01-06 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US15/723,881 Active US10496094B1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2017-10-03 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/652,103 Active US11921508B2 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2022-02-23 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US18/414,181 Pending US20240152143A1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2024-01-16 | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (6) | US9259838B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9259838B1 (en) * | 2014-07-24 | 2016-02-16 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US9423318B2 (en) * | 2014-07-29 | 2016-08-23 | Honeywell International Inc. | Motion detection devices and systems |
US9387588B1 (en) | 2014-08-25 | 2016-07-12 | Google Inc. | Handling gait disturbances with asynchronous timing |
US9618937B1 (en) | 2014-08-25 | 2017-04-11 | Google Inc. | Slip detection using robotic limbs |
US9499218B1 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2016-11-22 | Google Inc. | Mechanically-timed footsteps for a robotic device |
US9475193B2 (en) * | 2015-02-09 | 2016-10-25 | Harris Corporation | Unmanned ground vehicle stability control |
US9561592B1 (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2017-02-07 | Google Inc. | Ground plane compensation for legged robots |
US9925667B1 (en) | 2016-01-25 | 2018-03-27 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Continuous slip recovery |
KR102624560B1 (en) * | 2017-01-31 | 2024-01-15 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Cleaner |
CN114489092B (en) * | 2020-10-26 | 2023-07-18 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Foot robot motion control method, device, equipment and medium |
CN118334568B (en) * | 2024-06-13 | 2024-09-06 | 广汽埃安新能源汽车股份有限公司 | Pose construction method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Citations (57)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5357433A (en) | 1992-05-22 | 1994-10-18 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Gait generation system for a legged mobile robot |
US5432417A (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1995-07-11 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Locomotion control system for legged mobile robot |
EP1053835A1 (en) * | 1997-01-31 | 2000-11-22 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Leg type mobile robot control apparatus |
CA2388870A1 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 2001-05-25 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Home cleaning robot |
US20050126833A1 (en) | 2002-04-26 | 2005-06-16 | Toru Takenaka | Self-position estimating device for leg type movable robots |
US20060293808A1 (en) | 2003-08-11 | 2006-12-28 | Tek Electrical (Suzhou)Co., Ltd. | Device for self-determination position of a robot |
US20070050047A1 (en) | 2005-09-01 | 2007-03-01 | Ragnarsdottlr Heidrun G | System and method for determining terrain transitions |
US7339340B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2008-03-04 | Harris Corporation | Control system and related method for multi-limbed, multi-legged robot |
US20080154457A1 (en) | 2006-12-26 | 2008-06-26 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Position detecting system and method of the same |
US20080215185A1 (en) | 2006-11-13 | 2008-09-04 | Jacobsen Stephen C | Unmanned ground robotic vehicle having an alternatively extendible and retractable sensing appendage |
US20090228166A1 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2009-09-10 | I-Guide, Llc | Robotic Vehicle Controller |
US20110046780A1 (en) | 2009-08-18 | 2011-02-24 | Noel Wayne Anderson | Distributed robotic guidance |
US7953526B2 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2011-05-31 | I-Guide Robotics, Inc. | Robotic vehicle controller |
US20110166763A1 (en) | 2010-01-05 | 2011-07-07 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method detecting a robot slip |
US20110288684A1 (en) | 2010-05-20 | 2011-11-24 | Irobot Corporation | Mobile Robot System |
US20110313568A1 (en) | 2009-01-07 | 2011-12-22 | Trevor Blackwell | Robot Including Electrically Activated Joints |
US8160747B1 (en) | 2008-10-24 | 2012-04-17 | Anybots, Inc. | Remotely controlled self-balancing robot including kinematic image stabilization |
US8170738B2 (en) | 2008-12-12 | 2012-05-01 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd | Performance inspection method for autonomous mobile apparatus, and performance inspection sheet therefor |
KR20120043096A (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2012-05-03 | 니토 로보틱스 인코퍼레이티드 | Method and apparatus for simultaneous localization and mapping of mobile robot environment |
US20120155775A1 (en) | 2010-12-21 | 2012-06-21 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Walking robot and simultaneous localization and mapping method thereof |
US20120173070A1 (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2012-07-05 | Mark Steven Schnittman | Coverage robot navigating |
US20120197464A1 (en) | 2011-01-28 | 2012-08-02 | Intouch Health | Interfacing with a mobile telepresence robot |
CA2522097C (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2012-09-25 | Stephen James Crampton | Cmm arm with exoskeleton |
US20120303162A1 (en) | 2011-05-25 | 2012-11-29 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Mobile object controller and floor surface estimator |
US20120328395A1 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2012-12-27 | Raytheon Company | Teleoperated Robotic System |
US20130079929A1 (en) | 2011-09-28 | 2013-03-28 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Robot and control method thereof |
US8442661B1 (en) | 2008-11-25 | 2013-05-14 | Anybots 2.0, Inc. | Remotely controlled self-balancing robot including a stabilized laser pointer |
US20130131908A1 (en) | 2006-03-16 | 2013-05-23 | Gray & Company, Inc. | Navigation and control system for autonomous vehicles |
US20130211782A1 (en) * | 2012-02-10 | 2013-08-15 | Ascent Ventures, Llc | Automated Testing and Verification of a Robotic System |
US20130325029A1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2013-12-05 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Manipulator arm-to-patient collision avoidance using a null-space |
US8630763B2 (en) | 2010-03-22 | 2014-01-14 | John R. Goulding | Method of operating an in-line legged robot vehicle |
US9020637B2 (en) | 2012-11-02 | 2015-04-28 | Irobot Corporation | Simultaneous localization and mapping for a mobile robot |
US20150134079A1 (en) * | 2013-11-08 | 2015-05-14 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Walk-assistive robot and method of controlling the same |
US20150224649A1 (en) * | 2014-02-13 | 2015-08-13 | Fanuc Corporation | Robot system using visual feedback |
US20150343633A1 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2015-12-03 | Aldebaran Robotics S.A | Robot with joints of variable rigidity and method for calculating said optimized rigidity |
US9561592B1 (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2017-02-07 | Google Inc. | Ground plane compensation for legged robots |
WO2017037257A1 (en) * | 2015-09-04 | 2017-03-09 | RobArt GmbH | Identification and locating of a base station of an autonomous mobile robot |
US20180024561A1 (en) | 2016-07-20 | 2018-01-25 | Singapore University Of Technology And Design | Robot and method for localizing a robot |
US9926025B1 (en) * | 2014-08-25 | 2018-03-27 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Slip avoidance |
US10016900B1 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2018-07-10 | Auris Health, Inc. | Surgical robotic arm admittance control |
US20190015981A1 (en) | 2017-07-11 | 2019-01-17 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Movement planning apparatus, moving robot, and movement planning program |
CN109849854A (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2019-06-07 | 昝士录 | A kind of three Bei Moxi robots of six outer surface zero of car damage |
US10576620B1 (en) * | 2016-04-08 | 2020-03-03 | Ikutuki | Robotic mobility device and control |
KR102220304B1 (en) * | 2020-02-28 | 2021-02-25 | 주식회사 두산 | Apparatus and method for controlling robot |
US20210089040A1 (en) * | 2016-02-29 | 2021-03-25 | AI Incorporated | Obstacle recognition method for autonomous robots |
US10974391B2 (en) * | 2012-06-08 | 2021-04-13 | Irobot Corporation | Carpet drift estimation using differential sensors or visual measurements |
WO2021073733A1 (en) * | 2019-10-16 | 2021-04-22 | Supsi | Method for controlling a device by a human |
US20210134079A1 (en) * | 2019-11-01 | 2021-05-06 | Cruise LLC | Autonomous setup and takedown of calibration environment for vehicle sensor calibration |
WO2021086796A1 (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2021-05-06 | Nvidia Corporation | Determining object orientation from an image with machine learning |
WO2021087161A1 (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2021-05-06 | NailPro, Inc. | Automated total nail care systems, devices and methods |
US20210147016A1 (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2021-05-20 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Mechanically-Timed Footsteps for a Robotic Device |
US20210146548A1 (en) * | 2014-08-25 | 2021-05-20 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Handling Gait Disturbances with Asynchronous Timing |
US11027415B1 (en) * | 2014-08-25 | 2021-06-08 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Generalized coordinate surrogates for integrated estimation and control |
JP6884413B2 (en) * | 2015-10-28 | 2021-06-09 | バー−イラン ユニバーシティ | Robot cooperation system |
US20210171135A1 (en) * | 2014-08-25 | 2021-06-10 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Slip Detection for Robotic Locomotion |
US11037320B1 (en) * | 2016-03-01 | 2021-06-15 | AI Incorporated | Method for estimating distance using point measurement and color depth |
CN113184054A (en) * | 2021-05-20 | 2021-07-30 | 上海擎朗智能科技有限公司 | Robot chassis and robot chassis control method |
Family Cites Families (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7663333B2 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2010-02-16 | Irobot Corporation | Method and system for multi-mode coverage for an autonomous robot |
JP3599244B2 (en) * | 2002-11-06 | 2004-12-08 | ソニー株式会社 | Robot device, motion control device of robot device, and motion control method |
WO2007041295A2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-12 | Irobot Corporation | Companion robot for personal interaction |
JP4929506B2 (en) * | 2007-03-29 | 2012-05-09 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Legged mobile robot |
JP4466715B2 (en) * | 2007-10-25 | 2010-05-26 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Legged robot and control method thereof |
JP5232124B2 (en) * | 2009-10-28 | 2013-07-10 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Control device for legged mobile robot |
US8918209B2 (en) * | 2010-05-20 | 2014-12-23 | Irobot Corporation | Mobile human interface robot |
JP2012024872A (en) * | 2010-07-22 | 2012-02-09 | Toyota Motor Corp | Legged walking robot and method for determining foot trajectory of the same |
KR20120071599A (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2012-07-03 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Walking robot and control method thereof |
US9323250B2 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2016-04-26 | Intouch Technologies, Inc. | Time-dependent navigation of telepresence robots |
JP5659898B2 (en) * | 2011-03-22 | 2015-01-28 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Legged robot, its control method, and control program |
WO2013011644A1 (en) * | 2011-07-15 | 2013-01-24 | パナソニック株式会社 | Posture estimation device, posture estimation method, and posture estimation program |
JP5930892B2 (en) * | 2011-09-07 | 2016-06-08 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Contact state estimation device and trajectory generation device |
FR2981173B1 (en) * | 2011-10-11 | 2013-11-29 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A ROBOT |
US8805584B2 (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2014-08-12 | Disney Enterprises, Inc | Kinematic and dynamic calibration methods for legged robots with force-controlled joints |
JP5945419B2 (en) * | 2012-01-10 | 2016-07-05 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Leg motion trajectory generator for legged mobile robots. |
US8958911B2 (en) * | 2012-02-29 | 2015-02-17 | Irobot Corporation | Mobile robot |
US9004201B2 (en) * | 2012-04-18 | 2015-04-14 | Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University | Jumping robot |
US9517559B2 (en) * | 2013-09-27 | 2016-12-13 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Robot control system, robot control method and output control method |
US9259838B1 (en) * | 2014-07-24 | 2016-02-16 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation |
US9561829B1 (en) * | 2014-09-03 | 2017-02-07 | X Development Llc | Robotic leg with multiple robotic feet |
US9886035B1 (en) * | 2015-08-17 | 2018-02-06 | X Development Llc | Ground plane detection to verify depth sensor status for robot navigation |
US11927965B2 (en) * | 2016-02-29 | 2024-03-12 | AI Incorporated | Obstacle recognition method for autonomous robots |
KR102565823B1 (en) * | 2016-05-30 | 2023-08-10 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Mobile robot and method for controlling the same |
US11358663B2 (en) * | 2018-08-02 | 2022-06-14 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | Miniature walking robot with soft joints and links |
EP4010239B1 (en) * | 2019-08-06 | 2023-11-22 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Leg swing trajectories |
CN114401887A (en) * | 2019-08-06 | 2022-04-26 | 波士顿动力公司 | Step contact detection |
JP2021062431A (en) * | 2019-10-11 | 2021-04-22 | ソニー株式会社 | Robot device and method for controlling the same |
US11691292B2 (en) * | 2019-10-14 | 2023-07-04 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Robot choreographer |
US11465281B2 (en) * | 2019-10-14 | 2022-10-11 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Dynamic planning controller |
US11292126B2 (en) * | 2019-10-17 | 2022-04-05 | Disney Enterprises, Inc. | Robots with robust bipedal locomotion supported with non-conventional physics |
EP3838508A1 (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2021-06-23 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Intelligent gripper with individual cup control |
JP2021142589A (en) * | 2020-03-10 | 2021-09-24 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Operation system for moving body |
US11453348B2 (en) * | 2020-04-14 | 2022-09-27 | Gm Cruise Holdings Llc | Polyhedral sensor calibration target for calibrating multiple types of sensors |
US11597081B2 (en) * | 2020-04-21 | 2023-03-07 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Slip handling and ground friction estimation for robots |
CN116802020A (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2023-09-22 | 波士顿动力公司 | User interface for supervised autonomous crawling |
EP4263152A1 (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2023-10-25 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Supervised autonomous grasping |
WO2022140173A1 (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2022-06-30 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Door opening behavior and robot presenting the behaviour |
US12059814B2 (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2024-08-13 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Object-based robot control |
EP4285199A1 (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2023-12-06 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Semantic models for robot autonomy on dynamic sites |
-
2014
- 2014-07-24 US US14/339,860 patent/US9259838B1/en active Active
-
2016
- 2016-01-06 US US14/988,913 patent/US9804600B1/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-10-03 US US15/723,881 patent/US10496094B1/en active Active
-
2019
- 2019-10-08 US US16/596,006 patent/US11287819B2/en active Active
-
2022
- 2022-02-23 US US17/652,103 patent/US11921508B2/en active Active
-
2024
- 2024-01-16 US US18/414,181 patent/US20240152143A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (59)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5432417A (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1995-07-11 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Locomotion control system for legged mobile robot |
US5357433A (en) | 1992-05-22 | 1994-10-18 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Gait generation system for a legged mobile robot |
EP1053835A1 (en) * | 1997-01-31 | 2000-11-22 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Leg type mobile robot control apparatus |
US20130325029A1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2013-12-05 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Manipulator arm-to-patient collision avoidance using a null-space |
CA2388870A1 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 2001-05-25 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Home cleaning robot |
US20050126833A1 (en) | 2002-04-26 | 2005-06-16 | Toru Takenaka | Self-position estimating device for leg type movable robots |
CA2522097C (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2012-09-25 | Stephen James Crampton | Cmm arm with exoskeleton |
US20060293808A1 (en) | 2003-08-11 | 2006-12-28 | Tek Electrical (Suzhou)Co., Ltd. | Device for self-determination position of a robot |
US7339340B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2008-03-04 | Harris Corporation | Control system and related method for multi-limbed, multi-legged robot |
US20070050047A1 (en) | 2005-09-01 | 2007-03-01 | Ragnarsdottlr Heidrun G | System and method for determining terrain transitions |
US8852292B2 (en) | 2005-09-01 | 2014-10-07 | Ossur Hf | System and method for determining terrain transitions |
US20090228166A1 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2009-09-10 | I-Guide, Llc | Robotic Vehicle Controller |
US7953526B2 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2011-05-31 | I-Guide Robotics, Inc. | Robotic vehicle controller |
US20130131908A1 (en) | 2006-03-16 | 2013-05-23 | Gray & Company, Inc. | Navigation and control system for autonomous vehicles |
US20080215185A1 (en) | 2006-11-13 | 2008-09-04 | Jacobsen Stephen C | Unmanned ground robotic vehicle having an alternatively extendible and retractable sensing appendage |
US20080154457A1 (en) | 2006-12-26 | 2008-06-26 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Position detecting system and method of the same |
US8160747B1 (en) | 2008-10-24 | 2012-04-17 | Anybots, Inc. | Remotely controlled self-balancing robot including kinematic image stabilization |
US8442661B1 (en) | 2008-11-25 | 2013-05-14 | Anybots 2.0, Inc. | Remotely controlled self-balancing robot including a stabilized laser pointer |
US8170738B2 (en) | 2008-12-12 | 2012-05-01 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd | Performance inspection method for autonomous mobile apparatus, and performance inspection sheet therefor |
US20110313568A1 (en) | 2009-01-07 | 2011-12-22 | Trevor Blackwell | Robot Including Electrically Activated Joints |
US20110046780A1 (en) | 2009-08-18 | 2011-02-24 | Noel Wayne Anderson | Distributed robotic guidance |
KR20120043096A (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2012-05-03 | 니토 로보틱스 인코퍼레이티드 | Method and apparatus for simultaneous localization and mapping of mobile robot environment |
US20110166763A1 (en) | 2010-01-05 | 2011-07-07 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method detecting a robot slip |
US8630763B2 (en) | 2010-03-22 | 2014-01-14 | John R. Goulding | Method of operating an in-line legged robot vehicle |
US20110288684A1 (en) | 2010-05-20 | 2011-11-24 | Irobot Corporation | Mobile Robot System |
US9014848B2 (en) | 2010-05-20 | 2015-04-21 | Irobot Corporation | Mobile robot system |
US20120155775A1 (en) | 2010-12-21 | 2012-06-21 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Walking robot and simultaneous localization and mapping method thereof |
US20120173070A1 (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2012-07-05 | Mark Steven Schnittman | Coverage robot navigating |
US20120197464A1 (en) | 2011-01-28 | 2012-08-02 | Intouch Health | Interfacing with a mobile telepresence robot |
US20120328395A1 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2012-12-27 | Raytheon Company | Teleoperated Robotic System |
US20120303162A1 (en) | 2011-05-25 | 2012-11-29 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Mobile object controller and floor surface estimator |
US20150343633A1 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2015-12-03 | Aldebaran Robotics S.A | Robot with joints of variable rigidity and method for calculating said optimized rigidity |
US20130079929A1 (en) | 2011-09-28 | 2013-03-28 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Robot and control method thereof |
US20130211782A1 (en) * | 2012-02-10 | 2013-08-15 | Ascent Ventures, Llc | Automated Testing and Verification of a Robotic System |
US10974391B2 (en) * | 2012-06-08 | 2021-04-13 | Irobot Corporation | Carpet drift estimation using differential sensors or visual measurements |
US9020637B2 (en) | 2012-11-02 | 2015-04-28 | Irobot Corporation | Simultaneous localization and mapping for a mobile robot |
US20150134079A1 (en) * | 2013-11-08 | 2015-05-14 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Walk-assistive robot and method of controlling the same |
US20150224649A1 (en) * | 2014-02-13 | 2015-08-13 | Fanuc Corporation | Robot system using visual feedback |
US20210146548A1 (en) * | 2014-08-25 | 2021-05-20 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Handling Gait Disturbances with Asynchronous Timing |
US11027415B1 (en) * | 2014-08-25 | 2021-06-08 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Generalized coordinate surrogates for integrated estimation and control |
US9926025B1 (en) * | 2014-08-25 | 2018-03-27 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Slip avoidance |
US20210171135A1 (en) * | 2014-08-25 | 2021-06-10 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Slip Detection for Robotic Locomotion |
US20210147016A1 (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2021-05-20 | Boston Dynamics, Inc. | Mechanically-Timed Footsteps for a Robotic Device |
US9561592B1 (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2017-02-07 | Google Inc. | Ground plane compensation for legged robots |
WO2017037257A1 (en) * | 2015-09-04 | 2017-03-09 | RobArt GmbH | Identification and locating of a base station of an autonomous mobile robot |
JP6884413B2 (en) * | 2015-10-28 | 2021-06-09 | バー−イラン ユニバーシティ | Robot cooperation system |
US20210089040A1 (en) * | 2016-02-29 | 2021-03-25 | AI Incorporated | Obstacle recognition method for autonomous robots |
US11037320B1 (en) * | 2016-03-01 | 2021-06-15 | AI Incorporated | Method for estimating distance using point measurement and color depth |
US10576620B1 (en) * | 2016-04-08 | 2020-03-03 | Ikutuki | Robotic mobility device and control |
US20180024561A1 (en) | 2016-07-20 | 2018-01-25 | Singapore University Of Technology And Design | Robot and method for localizing a robot |
US20190015981A1 (en) | 2017-07-11 | 2019-01-17 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Movement planning apparatus, moving robot, and movement planning program |
US10016900B1 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2018-07-10 | Auris Health, Inc. | Surgical robotic arm admittance control |
CN109849854A (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2019-06-07 | 昝士录 | A kind of three Bei Moxi robots of six outer surface zero of car damage |
WO2021073733A1 (en) * | 2019-10-16 | 2021-04-22 | Supsi | Method for controlling a device by a human |
WO2021087161A1 (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2021-05-06 | NailPro, Inc. | Automated total nail care systems, devices and methods |
WO2021086796A1 (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2021-05-06 | Nvidia Corporation | Determining object orientation from an image with machine learning |
US20210134079A1 (en) * | 2019-11-01 | 2021-05-06 | Cruise LLC | Autonomous setup and takedown of calibration environment for vehicle sensor calibration |
KR102220304B1 (en) * | 2020-02-28 | 2021-02-25 | 주식회사 두산 | Apparatus and method for controlling robot |
CN113184054A (en) * | 2021-05-20 | 2021-07-30 | 上海擎朗智能科技有限公司 | Robot chassis and robot chassis control method |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
Bloesch, et al.; State Estimation for Legged Robots: Consistent Fusion of Leg Kinematics and IMU; Robotics: Science and Systems VIII; pp. 17-24 (Year: 2013). * |
DeLeon, et al.; A Sensor Fusion Method for Pose Estimation of C-Legged Robots; Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 20(23), 6741 (Year: 2020). * |
Liu, et al.; Optical Flow Measurement of Human Walking; Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium; pp. 547-554 (Year: 2012). * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20220179417A1 (en) | 2022-06-09 |
US11921508B2 (en) | 2024-03-05 |
US9804600B1 (en) | 2017-10-31 |
US9259838B1 (en) | 2016-02-16 |
US20240152143A1 (en) | 2024-05-09 |
US20200033860A1 (en) | 2020-01-30 |
US10496094B1 (en) | 2019-12-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11921508B2 (en) | Systems and methods for ground plane estimation | |
US11911916B2 (en) | Natural pitch and roll | |
TWI827649B (en) | Apparatuses, systems and methods for vslam scale estimation | |
US9662791B1 (en) | Systems and methods for robotic self-right | |
US9969087B1 (en) | Leg collision avoidance in a robotic device | |
KR102079940B1 (en) | Mobile robot having function estimating friction coefficient and method of estimating the same | |
KR20150088636A (en) | Apparatus and method for estimating position | |
US9833899B1 (en) | Adaptive response to load | |
US9395726B1 (en) | Methods and devices for bound and gallop gaits | |
JP2019517662A (en) | Accelerometer | |
CN106020198B (en) | Somatosensory vehicle carrying method and somatosensory vehicle | |
Oriolo et al. | Vision-based odometric localization for humanoids using a kinematic EKF | |
Schmidt-Wetekam et al. | Inertial rotation center position estimation for a perching treaded vehicle | |
Yamana et al. | Development of Autonomous Robot for the Labor-saving Forestry-Positioning of the Robot using IMU, GPS and Encoder |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BOSTON DYNAMICS, INC., MAINE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GOOGLE INC.;REEL/FRAME:050668/0280 Effective date: 20160317 Owner name: GOOGLE INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BLANKESPOOR, KEVIN;NELSON, GABRIEL;NEVILLE, NEIL;SIGNING DATES FROM 20140722 TO 20140728;REEL/FRAME:050668/0255 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BOSTON DYNAMICS, INC., MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE STATE OF THE ASSIGNEE FROM MAINE TO MASSACHUSETTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 050668 FRAME 0280. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:GOOGLE INC.;REEL/FRAME:050767/0721 Effective date: 20160317 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BOSTON DYNAMICS, INC., DELAWARE Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:BOSTON DYNAMICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:057711/0202 Effective date: 20210614 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BOSTON DYNAMICS, INC., DELAWARE Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATIONS NUMBERS 63127573 AND 11/302759 AND THE CITY OF THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 057111 FRAME: 0202. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:BOSTON DYNAMICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:057964/0415 Effective date: 20210614 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |