[go: up one dir, main page]

US10233356B2 - Polishing slurry for cobalt-containing substrate - Google Patents

Polishing slurry for cobalt-containing substrate Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US10233356B2
US10233356B2 US15/450,139 US201715450139A US10233356B2 US 10233356 B2 US10233356 B2 US 10233356B2 US 201715450139 A US201715450139 A US 201715450139A US 10233356 B2 US10233356 B2 US 10233356B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
cobalt
slurry
polishing
colloidal silica
aqueous slurry
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US15/450,139
Other versions
US20180254193A1 (en
Inventor
Murali G. Theivanayagam
Hongyu Wang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dupont Electronic Materials Holding Inc
Original Assignee
Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials CMP Holdings Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials CMP Holdings Inc filed Critical Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials CMP Holdings Inc
Priority to US15/450,139 priority Critical patent/US10233356B2/en
Assigned to ROHM AND HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS CMP HOLDINGS, INC. reassignment ROHM AND HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS CMP HOLDINGS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: THEIVANAYAGAM, Murali G., WANG, HONGYU
Publication of US20180254193A1 publication Critical patent/US20180254193A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US10233356B2 publication Critical patent/US10233356B2/en
Assigned to DuPont Electronic Materials Holding, Inc. reassignment DuPont Electronic Materials Holding, Inc. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ROHM & HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS CMP HOLDINGS INC.
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09GPOLISHING COMPOSITIONS; SKI WAXES
    • C09G1/00Polishing compositions
    • C09G1/02Polishing compositions containing abrasives or grinding agents
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24BMACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B1/00Processes of grinding or polishing; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such processes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24BMACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B37/00Lapping machines or devices; Accessories
    • B24B37/04Lapping machines or devices; Accessories designed for working plane surfaces
    • B24B37/042Lapping machines or devices; Accessories designed for working plane surfaces operating processes therefor
    • B24B37/044Lapping machines or devices; Accessories designed for working plane surfaces operating processes therefor characterised by the composition of the lapping agent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09GPOLISHING COMPOSITIONS; SKI WAXES
    • C09G1/00Polishing compositions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09GPOLISHING COMPOSITIONS; SKI WAXES
    • C09G1/00Polishing compositions
    • C09G1/04Aqueous dispersions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09GPOLISHING COMPOSITIONS; SKI WAXES
    • C09G1/00Polishing compositions
    • C09G1/06Other polishing compositions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K13/00Etching, surface-brightening or pickling compositions
    • C09K13/04Etching, surface-brightening or pickling compositions containing an inorganic acid
    • C09K13/06Etching, surface-brightening or pickling compositions containing an inorganic acid with organic material
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K3/00Materials not provided for elsewhere
    • C09K3/14Anti-slip materials; Abrasives
    • C09K3/1409Abrasive particles per se
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K3/00Materials not provided for elsewhere
    • C09K3/14Anti-slip materials; Abrasives
    • C09K3/1436Composite particles, e.g. coated particles
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K3/00Materials not provided for elsewhere
    • C09K3/14Anti-slip materials; Abrasives
    • C09K3/1454Abrasive powders, suspensions and pastes for polishing
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K3/00Materials not provided for elsewhere
    • C09K3/14Anti-slip materials; Abrasives
    • C09K3/1454Abrasive powders, suspensions and pastes for polishing
    • C09K3/1463Aqueous liquid suspensions
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/04Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having potential barriers, e.g. a PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
    • H01L21/18Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having potential barriers, e.g. a PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic Table or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
    • H01L21/30Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26
    • H01L21/302Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26 to change their surface-physical characteristics or shape, e.g. etching, polishing, cutting
    • H01L21/306Chemical or electrical treatment, e.g. electrolytic etching
    • H01L21/30625With simultaneous mechanical treatment, e.g. mechanico-chemical polishing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/04Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having potential barriers, e.g. a PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
    • H01L21/18Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having potential barriers, e.g. a PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic Table or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
    • H01L21/30Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26
    • H01L21/31Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26 to form insulating layers thereon, e.g. for masking or by using photolithographic techniques; After treatment of these layers; Selection of materials for these layers
    • H01L21/3205Deposition of non-insulating-, e.g. conductive- or resistive-, layers on insulating layers; After-treatment of these layers
    • H01L21/321After treatment
    • H01L21/32115Planarisation
    • H01L21/3212Planarisation by chemical mechanical polishing [CMP]

Definitions

  • semiconductor substrates have a silicon base and dielectric layers containing multiple trenches arranged to form a pattern of circuit interconnects within the dielectric layer. These trench patterns have either a damascene structure or dual damascene structure.
  • typically one to as many as three or more capping layers coat the trench patterned dielectric layer with a barrier layer covering the capping layer or capping layers.
  • a metal layer covers the barrier layer and fills the patterned trenches. The metal layer forms circuit interconnects that connect dielectric regions and form an integrated circuit.
  • these circuits contain copper for horizontal interconnections and tungsten for vertical interconnections.
  • cobalt-containing films are being implemented on top of Ti/TiN or Ta/TaN barrier layers for the first metal interconnects.
  • These cobalt-containing interconnects have a high depth to width aspect ratios that renders copper seed and subsequent copper electrodeposition. This enables a much thinner copper seed layer deposition, which improves the trench Cu electroplating process and avoid void formation.
  • cobalt can replace copper and form entire interconnects for the first metal interconnects.
  • cobalt can replace tungsten for trenches that connect multiple transistors. All these new processes require CMP to achieve planarity to the desired targeted thickness, dishing, defectivity and selectivities.
  • cobalt is prone to oxidation and corrosion, as it is an active metal.
  • Cobalt's reduction potential ( ⁇ 0.28 V vs. SHE) makes it an easy corrosion target when in contact with other nobler metals such as copper (+0.34 V vs. SHE). Since first layer interconnects contain cobalt in combination with the more noble copper, galvanic corrosion is of particular concern during cobalt polishing of this layer.
  • corrosion defects and the resulting metal roughness after CMP are major challenges in developing successful cobalt CMP slurry.
  • the invention provides an aqueous slurry useful for chemical mechanical polishing a semiconductor substrate having cobalt or cobalt alloy containing features containing Co 0 comprising: 0.1 to 2 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent ( ⁇ ), 0.5 to 3 wt % colloidal silica particles ( ⁇ ), the colloidal silica particles containing primary particles, the primary particles having an average diameter of 25 to 50 nm linked together in conjoined spherical structures, the conjoined spherical structures having an average length of 40 to 80 nm, a cobalt corrosion inhibitor, 0.5 to 2 wt % complexing agent ( ⁇ ) selected from at least one of L-aspartic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, nitrilotri(methylphosphonic acid), ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid trisodium salt, and ethylene glycol-bis (2aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-
  • An alternative embodiment of the invention provides an aqueous slurry useful for chemical mechanical polishing a semiconductor substrate having cobalt or cobalt alloy containing features containing Co 0 comprising: 0.5 to 1.5 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent ( ⁇ ), 0.75 to 2 wt % colloidal silica particles ( ⁇ ), the colloidal silica particles containing primary particles, the primary particles having an average diameter of 25 to 50 nm and linked together in conjoined spherical structures, the conjoined spherical structures having an average length of 40 to 80 nm, a cobalt corrosion inhibitor, 0.75 to 1.5 wt % complexing agent ( ⁇ ) selected from at least one of L-aspartic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, nitrilotri(methylphosphonic acid), ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid trisodium salt, and ethylene glycol-bis (2aminoethylether)-N,N,N
  • Co 0 refers to cobalt metal with incidental impurities or a cobalt-base alloy capable of conducting electrons and cobalt alloy refers to a cobalt mixture having a majority cobalt by weight percent.
  • the slurry contains sufficient oxidizer to convert Co 0 to Co +3 at a portion of the semiconductor substrate exposed to the slurry.
  • it typically coverts the cobalt into an oxide film.
  • This conversion may be a blend of Co +2 and Co +3 such as Co 3 O 4 or complete to Co +3 in the form of Co 2 O 3 .
  • the cobalt may also form hydroxide compounds, mixed oxide-hydroxide compounds and cobalt chelator complexes.
  • Hydrogen peroxide represents the preferred oxidizer for slurries of the invention. Because hydrogen peroxide decomposes over time, it is advantageous for the end user to add the hydrogen peroxide shortly before use.
  • the slurry contains 0.1 to 2 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent. Most preferably, the slurry contains 0.5 to 1.5 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent. This specification refers to all ingredients in weight percent, unless specifically noted otherwise.
  • Colloidal silica facilitates cobalt removal through mechanical means.
  • 0.5 to 3.0 wt % colloidal silica particles facilitate cobalt removal.
  • 0.75 to 2 wt % colloidal silica particles facilitate cobalt removal.
  • the colloidal silica are a structure containing primary particles.
  • the primary particles have an average diameter of 25 to 50 nm that are linked together into conjoined spherical structures.
  • the conjoined spherical structures have an average length of 40 to 80 nm. Most advantageously, the primary particles have an average diameter of 35 nm and the conjoined spheres have an average length of 70 nm.
  • the conjoined spherical structure allows efficient removal of cobalt structures not feasible with conventional or spherical colloidal silica particles.
  • an inhibitor prevents runaway corrosion of the cobalt and decreasing static etch.
  • Example inhibitors include nitrogen containing heterocycle inhibitors, such as benzotriazole, adenine, 1,2,4-triazole, imidazole, and polyimidazole or a combination of these.
  • the slurry includes 20 ppm to 2.2 wt % inhibitor. Most preferably, the slurry includes 20 ppm to 0.8 wt % inhibitor.
  • the inhibitor is either benzotriazole, a mixture of benzotriazole and polyamidazole or a mixture of benzotriazole and adenine. Most preferably, the inhibitor is benzotriazole.
  • a complexing agent accelerates the removal of cobalt from the semiconductor substrate.
  • the complexing agent is selected from at least one of L-aspartic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, nitrilotri(methylphosphonic acid), ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid trisodium salt, and ethylene glycol-bis (2aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid.
  • the complexing agent is L-aspartic acid.
  • L-aspartic acid has the advantage of limited rate decay when hydrogen peroxide concentration increases from 0.4 to 1.0 wt %, when using at least 1 wt % abrasives in the formulation at pH 8.
  • the slope of cobalt removal rate ( ⁇ /min) is from 0 to ⁇ 1050 for a cobalt blanket wafer when increasing the hydrogen peroxide ( ⁇ ) from 0.4 to 1.0 wt % when polishing with a polyurethane polishing pad having a Shore D hardness of 57, closed cell pores with an average diameter between 30 and 60 ⁇ m and circular grooves having a depth, width and pitch of 760, 510 and 3,050 ⁇ m, respectively at a downforce of 2 psi (13.8 kPa), 93 rpm platen speed, 87 rpm carrier speed with a slurry at 200 ml/min having 20 ⁇ m or 80 ⁇ m average diameter colloidal silica particles when using a diamond conditioner at a polish time of 10 to 60 seconds
  • these polishing conditions provide a cobalt removal rate of at least 1000 ⁇ /min at a hydrogen peroxide concentration of 1.0 wt %. Most preferably, these polishing conditions provide a cobalt removal rate of at least 2000 ⁇ /min at a hydrogen peroxide concentration of 1.0 wt %.
  • the concentration of complexing agent is 0.5 to 2 wt %. Most preferably, the complexing agent concentration is 0.75 to 1.5 wt %. It is critical to balance the oxidizer, complexing agent and abrasive in a manner to remove cobalt in an effective manner without excessive defects.
  • the slurry operates at a pH of 5 to 9 with an oxidation potential of the slurry sufficient to oxidize at least a portion of the Co 0 to Co +3 . Maintaining pH levels between 7 and 9 are advantageous for increasing cobalt removal rates, while keeping corrosion in control.
  • the slurry operates by balancing hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent ( ⁇ ), colloidal silica particles ( ⁇ ) and L-aspartic acid complexing agent ( ⁇ ) in an unconventional manner.
  • Conventional slurry operate at minimal abrasive levels that achieve acceptable removal rates. It is well known that limiting abrasive levels lead to lower defect levels. Unlike conventional slurries, this slurry increases oxidation and abrasive load to decrease polishing defects, while delivering high removal rates. Total concentrations remain within the following formulae as follows:
  • the total concentrations remain within the following formulae as follows:
  • the slurry may contain buffers, dispersion agents, and surfactants.
  • the polishing composition can also optionally include buffering agents such as various organic and inorganic bases or their salts with a pKa in the pH range of greater than 5 to 9.
  • the polishing composition can further optionally include defoaming agents, such as non-ionic surfactants including esters, ethylene oxides, alcohols, ethoxylate, silicon compounds, fluorine compounds, ethers, glycosides and their derivatives, and the like.
  • the defoaming agent can also be an amphoteric surfactant.
  • the polishing composition may optionally contain biocides, such as KordexTM MLX (9.5-9.9% methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, 89.1-89.5% water and ⁇ 1.0% related reaction product) or KathonTM ICP III containing active ingredients of 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, each manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company, (Kathon and Kordex are trademarks of The Dow Chemical Company).
  • biocides such as KordexTM MLX (9.5-9.9% methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, 89.1-89.5% water and ⁇ 1.0% related reaction product) or KathonTM ICP III containing active ingredients of 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, each manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company, (Kathon and Kordex are trademarks of The Dow Chemical Company).
  • the slurry polishes a semiconductor substrate by applying the slurry to a semiconductor substrate by placing 21 kPa or less downward force on a polishing pad.
  • the downward force represents the force of the polishing pad against the semiconductor substrate.
  • the polishing pad may have a circular shape, a belt shape or a web configuration. This low downward force is particularly useful for planarizing the semiconductor substrate to remove a barrier material from the semiconductor substrate.
  • the polishing occurs with a downward force of less than or equal to 15 kPa.
  • the polished cobalt wafers were passed through a DSS-200 SynergyTM (OnTrak) double-sided wafer scrubber running ATMI PlanarClean chemistry, cobalt removal rates were measured with RS200 metal film thickness measurement tool by KLA Tencor, and defectivity was analyzed with SP2 laser inspection tool by KLA Tencor. Polishing results are in Table 3 that compares the cobalt removal rate, defects, and surface roughness after polishing the cobalt wafers.
  • Abrasives Cold Silica Levels: The main function of abrasives is for mechanically driving the removal of ‘softened’ species on metal surfaces and for transporting slurry chemistry to the wafer and removing spent slurry from the wafer. Lowering the abrasives to 0.2 wt % shows beneficial effect of lowering the overall defects when compared to 1% abrasives at H 2 O 2 levels at or below 0.4%, however at 1% H 2 O 2 (1% aspartic acid), 0.2% abrasives delivers low Co RR, due to the passivation of cobalt as oxide/hydroxides that needs adequate mechanical abrasion to drive Co RR.
  • Oxidizer (H 2 O 2 ) Levels The main function of oxidizer such as H 2 O 2 is to oxidize the metal surface and facilitate their removal. Optimum H 2 O 2 level is critical to balance the oxidation and mechanical removal of cobalt in the presence of chelators. With the optimum level of aspartic acid (1 wt %) and abrasives (1 wt %) in the slurry, 1 wt % H 2 O 2 deliver the lowest defect counts and highest Co removal rates.
  • aspartic Acid The main function of complexing agents such as aspartic acid is to solubilize and chelate the oxidized metal ions and remove them from the wafer surface. From the polishing data in table 3, it can be seen that aspartic acid concentration also plays a critical role in Co RR, roughness, and defects. Addition of up to 2% aspartic acid, increases the chemical dissolution (etching) of cobalt, thereby disrupting the oxidation/chemical/mechanical removal, providing lower cobalt removal rates, and high surface roughness. Therefore, around 1 wt % aspartic acid is ideal to deliver high removal rates, low surface roughness and low defects.
  • Table 4 shows that a minimum of 0.05 wt % colloidal silica is necessary to provide smooth polishing conditions.
  • Table 5 shows that excessive amounts of oxidizer lowers cobalt removal rate and increases surface roughness and increasing colloidal silica increases Co removal rate.
  • L-aspartic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, nitrilotri(methylphosphonic acid), ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid trisodium salt, and ethylene glycol-bis (2aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid all have sufficient removal cobalt rate in combination with good rate stability with change in H 2 O 2 from 0.4 to 1.0 wt %.
  • the complexing agent is L-aspartic acid.
  • the polishing slurry provides an unconventional combination of oxidizer, conjoined spherical silica particles and rate-stable complexing agent to provide a high rate slurry capable of polishing cobalt and cobalt-containing semiconductor features. It removes these features with lower defects by increasing oxidation of Co 0 to Co +3 in combination with a higher particle load during polishing. Furthermore, the complexing agent has limited rated variation with the Co 0 to Co +3 oxidation of the invention.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Composite Materials (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)
  • Mechanical Treatment Of Semiconductor (AREA)

Abstract

The invention is an aqueous slurry useful for chemical mechanical polishing a semiconductor substrate having cobalt or cobalt alloy containing features containing Co0. The slurry includes 0.1 to 2 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent (α), 0.5 to 3 wt % colloidal silica particles (β), a cobalt corrosion inhibitor, 0.5 to 2 wt % complexing agent (γ) selected from at least one of L-aspartic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, nitrilotri(methylphosphonic acid), ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid trisodium salt, and ethylene glycol-bis (2aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid, and balance water having a pH of 5 to 9. The total concentrations remain within the following formulae as follows: wt % (α)+wt % (β)=1 to 4 wt % for polishing the cobalt or cobalt alloy; wt % (γ)≤2*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and wt % (β)+wt % (γ)≤3*wt % (α) for limiting static etch.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Typically, semiconductor substrates have a silicon base and dielectric layers containing multiple trenches arranged to form a pattern of circuit interconnects within the dielectric layer. These trench patterns have either a damascene structure or dual damascene structure. In addition, typically one to as many as three or more capping layers coat the trench patterned dielectric layer with a barrier layer covering the capping layer or capping layers. Finally, a metal layer covers the barrier layer and fills the patterned trenches. The metal layer forms circuit interconnects that connect dielectric regions and form an integrated circuit. Typically, these circuits contain copper for horizontal interconnections and tungsten for vertical interconnections.
For the advanced technical nodes with line widths of 10 nm and below, cobalt-containing films are being implemented on top of Ti/TiN or Ta/TaN barrier layers for the first metal interconnects. These cobalt-containing interconnects have a high depth to width aspect ratios that renders copper seed and subsequent copper electrodeposition. This enables a much thinner copper seed layer deposition, which improves the trench Cu electroplating process and avoid void formation. In addition, cobalt can replace copper and form entire interconnects for the first metal interconnects. Finally, cobalt can replace tungsten for trenches that connect multiple transistors. All these new processes require CMP to achieve planarity to the desired targeted thickness, dishing, defectivity and selectivities.
For slurries that involve in these processes, they need to have special chemistries to handle the peculiarities of cobalt films. First, cobalt is prone to oxidation and corrosion, as it is an active metal. Cobalt's reduction potential (−0.28 V vs. SHE) makes it an easy corrosion target when in contact with other nobler metals such as copper (+0.34 V vs. SHE). Since first layer interconnects contain cobalt in combination with the more noble copper, galvanic corrosion is of particular concern during cobalt polishing of this layer. Second, corrosion defects and the resulting metal roughness after CMP are major challenges in developing successful cobalt CMP slurry.
There is a demand for a polishing slurry that can polish cobalt in multiple films without excessive corrosion. Furthermore, there is a demand for a cobalt slurry that can polish cobalt into a planar surface with little surface roughness.
STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides an aqueous slurry useful for chemical mechanical polishing a semiconductor substrate having cobalt or cobalt alloy containing features containing Co0 comprising: 0.1 to 2 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent (α), 0.5 to 3 wt % colloidal silica particles (β), the colloidal silica particles containing primary particles, the primary particles having an average diameter of 25 to 50 nm linked together in conjoined spherical structures, the conjoined spherical structures having an average length of 40 to 80 nm, a cobalt corrosion inhibitor, 0.5 to 2 wt % complexing agent (γ) selected from at least one of L-aspartic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, nitrilotri(methylphosphonic acid), ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid trisodium salt, and ethylene glycol-bis (2aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid, and balance water having a pH of 5 to 9 wherein oxidation potential of the slurry is sufficient to oxidize at least a portion of the Co0 to Co+3 and wherein the total concentrations remain within the following formulae as follows: wt % (α)+wt % (β)=1 to 4 wt % for polishing the cobalt or cobalt alloy; wt % (γ)≤2*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and wt % (β)+wt % (γ)≤3*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and wherein slope of cobalt removal rate (Å/min) is from 0 to −1050 for a cobalt blanket wafer when increasing the hydrogen peroxide (α) from 0.4 to 1.0 wt % when polishing with a polyurethane polishing pad having a Shore D hardness of 57, closed cell pores with an average diameter between 30 and 60 μm and circular grooves having a depth, width and pitch of 760, 510 and 3,050 μm, respectively at a downforce of 2 psi (13.8 kPa), 93 rpm platen speed, 87 rpm carrier speed with a slurry at 200 ml/min having 35 nm or 80 nm average diameter colloidal silica particles when using a diamond conditioner at a polish time of 10 to 60 seconds.
An alternative embodiment of the invention provides an aqueous slurry useful for chemical mechanical polishing a semiconductor substrate having cobalt or cobalt alloy containing features containing Co0 comprising: 0.5 to 1.5 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent (α), 0.75 to 2 wt % colloidal silica particles (β), the colloidal silica particles containing primary particles, the primary particles having an average diameter of 25 to 50 nm and linked together in conjoined spherical structures, the conjoined spherical structures having an average length of 40 to 80 nm, a cobalt corrosion inhibitor, 0.75 to 1.5 wt % complexing agent (γ) selected from at least one of L-aspartic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, nitrilotri(methylphosphonic acid), ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid trisodium salt, and ethylene glycol-bis (2aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid, and balance water having a pH of 5 to 9 wherein oxidation potential of the slurry is sufficient to oxidize at least a portion of the Co0 to Co+3 and wherein the total concentrations remain within the following formulae as follows: wt % (α)+wt % (β)=1.5 to 3 wt % for polishing the cobalt or cobalt alloy; wt % (γ)≤1.5*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and wt % (β)+wt % (γ)≤2.5*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and wherein slope of cobalt removal rate (Å/min) is from 0 to −1050 for a cobalt blanket wafer when increasing the hydrogen peroxide (α) from 0.4 to 1.0 wt % when polishing with a polyurethane polishing pad having a Shore D hardness of 57, closed cell pores with an average diameter between 30 and 60 μm and circular grooves having a depth, width and pitch of 760, 510 and 3,050 μm, respectively at a downforce of 2 psi (13.8 kPa), 93 rpm platen speed, 87 rpm carrier speed with a slurry at 200 ml/min having 35 nm or 80 nm average diameter colloidal silica particles when using a diamond conditioner at a polish time of 10 to 60 seconds.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
It has been discovered that an increased combination of oxidizer and abrasive can lower defects in relation to a low-abrasive formulation. This is counterintuitive to the general proposition that slurry particles tend to increase polishing defects such as imbedded particles, organic deposits and scratching. It has been discovered that complete oxidation of at least a portion of the Co0 to Co+3 decreases defects in relation to slurries driven primarily by complexing Co+2 formed at the surface. For purposes of this specification, Co0 refers to cobalt metal with incidental impurities or a cobalt-base alloy capable of conducting electrons and cobalt alloy refers to a cobalt mixture having a majority cobalt by weight percent.
The slurry contains sufficient oxidizer to convert Co0 to Co+3 at a portion of the semiconductor substrate exposed to the slurry. In addition to oxidizing the metal valence to a cation, it typically coverts the cobalt into an oxide film. This conversion may be a blend of Co+2 and Co+3 such as Co3O4 or complete to Co+3 in the form of Co2O3. Alternatively, the cobalt may also form hydroxide compounds, mixed oxide-hydroxide compounds and cobalt chelator complexes.
Hydrogen peroxide represents the preferred oxidizer for slurries of the invention. Because hydrogen peroxide decomposes over time, it is advantageous for the end user to add the hydrogen peroxide shortly before use. Preferably, the slurry contains 0.1 to 2 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent. Most preferably, the slurry contains 0.5 to 1.5 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent. This specification refers to all ingredients in weight percent, unless specifically noted otherwise.
Colloidal silica facilitates cobalt removal through mechanical means. Preferably, 0.5 to 3.0 wt % colloidal silica particles facilitate cobalt removal. Most preferably, 0.75 to 2 wt % colloidal silica particles facilitate cobalt removal. The colloidal silica are a structure containing primary particles. The primary particles have an average diameter of 25 to 50 nm that are linked together into conjoined spherical structures. The conjoined spherical structures have an average length of 40 to 80 nm. Most advantageously, the primary particles have an average diameter of 35 nm and the conjoined spheres have an average length of 70 nm. The conjoined spherical structure allows efficient removal of cobalt structures not feasible with conventional or spherical colloidal silica particles.
In addition to the oxidation of the cobalt, an inhibitor prevents runaway corrosion of the cobalt and decreasing static etch. Example inhibitors include nitrogen containing heterocycle inhibitors, such as benzotriazole, adenine, 1,2,4-triazole, imidazole, and polyimidazole or a combination of these. Preferably, the slurry includes 20 ppm to 2.2 wt % inhibitor. Most preferably, the slurry includes 20 ppm to 0.8 wt % inhibitor. Preferably, the inhibitor is either benzotriazole, a mixture of benzotriazole and polyamidazole or a mixture of benzotriazole and adenine. Most preferably, the inhibitor is benzotriazole.
A complexing agent accelerates the removal of cobalt from the semiconductor substrate. Preferably, the complexing agent is selected from at least one of L-aspartic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, nitrilotri(methylphosphonic acid), ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid trisodium salt, and ethylene glycol-bis (2aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid. Most preferably, the complexing agent is L-aspartic acid. L-aspartic acid has the advantage of limited rate decay when hydrogen peroxide concentration increases from 0.4 to 1.0 wt %, when using at least 1 wt % abrasives in the formulation at pH 8. The slope of cobalt removal rate (Å/min) is from 0 to −1050 for a cobalt blanket wafer when increasing the hydrogen peroxide (α) from 0.4 to 1.0 wt % when polishing with a polyurethane polishing pad having a Shore D hardness of 57, closed cell pores with an average diameter between 30 and 60 μm and circular grooves having a depth, width and pitch of 760, 510 and 3,050 μm, respectively at a downforce of 2 psi (13.8 kPa), 93 rpm platen speed, 87 rpm carrier speed with a slurry at 200 ml/min having 20 μm or 80 μm average diameter colloidal silica particles when using a diamond conditioner at a polish time of 10 to 60 seconds. Preferably, these polishing conditions provide a cobalt removal rate of at least 1000 Å/min at a hydrogen peroxide concentration of 1.0 wt %. Most preferably, these polishing conditions provide a cobalt removal rate of at least 2000 Å/min at a hydrogen peroxide concentration of 1.0 wt %.
Preferably the concentration of complexing agent is 0.5 to 2 wt %. Most preferably, the complexing agent concentration is 0.75 to 1.5 wt %. It is critical to balance the oxidizer, complexing agent and abrasive in a manner to remove cobalt in an effective manner without excessive defects.
The slurry operates at a pH of 5 to 9 with an oxidation potential of the slurry sufficient to oxidize at least a portion of the Co0 to Co+3. Maintaining pH levels between 7 and 9 are advantageous for increasing cobalt removal rates, while keeping corrosion in control.
The slurry operates by balancing hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent (α), colloidal silica particles (β) and L-aspartic acid complexing agent (γ) in an unconventional manner. Conventional slurry operate at minimal abrasive levels that achieve acceptable removal rates. It is well known that limiting abrasive levels lead to lower defect levels. Unlike conventional slurries, this slurry increases oxidation and abrasive load to decrease polishing defects, while delivering high removal rates. Total concentrations remain within the following formulae as follows:
wt % (α)+wt % (β)=1 to 4 wt % for polishing the cobalt or cobalt alloy;
wt % (γ)≤2*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and
wt % (β)+wt % (γ)≤3*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy. Preferably, maintaining the wt % (α)+wt % (β)=1.5 to 3 wt % provides lower defects with an acceptable cobalt removal.
Preferably, the total concentrations remain within the following formulae as follows:
wt % (α)+wt % (β)=1.5 to 3 wt % for polishing the cobalt or cobalt alloy;
wt % (γ)≤1.5*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and
wt % (β)+wt % (γ)≤2.5*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy. Most preferably, maintaining the wt % (α)+wt % (β)=2 to 3 wt % provides lower defects with an acceptable cobalt removal.
Optionally, the slurry may contain buffers, dispersion agents, and surfactants.
The polishing composition can also optionally include buffering agents such as various organic and inorganic bases or their salts with a pKa in the pH range of greater than 5 to 9. The polishing composition can further optionally include defoaming agents, such as non-ionic surfactants including esters, ethylene oxides, alcohols, ethoxylate, silicon compounds, fluorine compounds, ethers, glycosides and their derivatives, and the like. The defoaming agent can also be an amphoteric surfactant. The polishing composition may optionally contain biocides, such as Kordex™ MLX (9.5-9.9% methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, 89.1-89.5% water and ≤1.0% related reaction product) or Kathon™ ICP III containing active ingredients of 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, each manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company, (Kathon and Kordex are trademarks of The Dow Chemical Company).
Preferably, the slurry polishes a semiconductor substrate by applying the slurry to a semiconductor substrate by placing 21 kPa or less downward force on a polishing pad. The downward force represents the force of the polishing pad against the semiconductor substrate. The polishing pad may have a circular shape, a belt shape or a web configuration. This low downward force is particularly useful for planarizing the semiconductor substrate to remove a barrier material from the semiconductor substrate. Most preferably, the polishing occurs with a downward force of less than or equal to 15 kPa.
EXAMPLES
Experimental Method:
All the slurries in Table 1 used for polishing studies were prepared as mentioned in the following procedure. Complexing agents were added at desired concentrations to de-ionized water and mixed using an overhead stirrer (300-450 RPM) till they were completely dissolved, followed by pH adjustment to pH around 7.0 with dilute KOH solution (5 to 45%). Colloidal silica (Fuso SH-3-35 nm average diameter colloidal silica particles forming conjoined spheres having an average length of 70 nm) were added at specified wt % to the slurry while stirring with a final pH adjustment to 8.0 using KOH. Cleanroom grade H2O2 (30% solution) was added to achieve desired wt % of H2O2 concentration with stirring, 15 minutes prior to the polishing experiments.
TABLE 1
Slurry Aspartic Colloidal pH
Sample acid silica H2O2 before
No. (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) H2O2
1 1.0 0.2 0.2 8
2 1.0 0.2 0.4 8
3 1.0 0.2 1.0 8
4 1.0 1.0 0.2 8
5 1.0 1.0 0.4 8
6 1.0 1.0 1.0 8
7 2.0 0.2 0.2 8
8 2.0 0.2 1.0 8
9 2.0 1.0 0.2 8
10 2.0 1.0 1.0 8
11 1.0 0 0.4 8
12 1.0 0.005 0.4 8
13 1.0 0.05 0.4 8
14 1.0 0.1 0.4 8
15 1.0 0.2 0.4 8
16 1.0 1.0 0.4 8
17 1.0 1.0 2.0 8
18 1.0 1.0 5.0 8
19 1.0 0.5 1.0 8
20 1.0 2.0 1.0 8
21 1.0 5.0 1.0 8
TABLE 2
Polishing Tool AMAT-MIRRA
Pad IC1010--a polyurethane; Shore D hardness of
57, 30 and 60 μm average diameter closed cell
pores and circular grooves having a depth,
width and pitch of 760, 510 and 3,050 μm,
respectively
Conditioner Saesol 8031C1-170 μm diamond size; 40 μm
diamond protrusion and 310 μm diamond
spacing
Process 2 PSI (13.8 kPa), 93/87 RPM, 200 ml/min
(Downforce, Platen Speed/Carrier Speed, Slurry
Flow Rate)
Post CMP Synergy - ATMI PlanarClean ™
clean Composition: Ethanolamine (1 to 10 wt %),
Tetramethylammonium hydroxide (1 to 10
wt %), pH > 13.5 and dilution 1:20.
Polish Time 10 to 60 sec
Wafers Novati PVD cobalt~2000 Å thick-200 mm
diameter
The polished cobalt wafers were passed through a DSS-200 Synergy™ (OnTrak) double-sided wafer scrubber running ATMI PlanarClean chemistry, cobalt removal rates were measured with RS200 metal film thickness measurement tool by KLA Tencor, and defectivity was analyzed with SP2 laser inspection tool by KLA Tencor. Polishing results are in Table 3 that compares the cobalt removal rate, defects, and surface roughness after polishing the cobalt wafers.
TABLE 3
Slurry Aspartic Colloidal pH Co
Sample acid silica H2O2 before Co RR Defect Ra
No. (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) H2O2 (Å/min) counts (Å)
1 1.0 0.2 0.2 8 1964 29111 17
2 1.0 0.2 0.4 8 2480 7571 5
3 1.0 0.2 1.0 8 83 461 10
4 1.0 1.0 0.2 8 2115 63281 14
5 1.0 1.0 0.4 8 2699 9237 4
6 1.0 1.0 1.0 8 3187 2539 4
7 2.0 0.2 0.2 8 1687 29111 45
8 2.0 0.2 1.0 8 1114 4956 6
9 2.0 1.0 0.2 8 1767 38700 10
10 2.0 1.0 1.0 8 968 63519 4
RR = Removal Rate,
Ra = Surface Roughness
As seen from Table 3, there is a clear three way interaction between aspartic acid, colloidal silica, and H2O2 levels. Slurry No. 6 with 1 wt % aspartic acid, 1 wt % colloidal silica, and 1 wt % H2O2 delivers the highest cobalt removal rate while simultaneously delivering low surface roughness, and low defects.
Abrasives (Colloidal Silica) Levels: The main function of abrasives is for mechanically driving the removal of ‘softened’ species on metal surfaces and for transporting slurry chemistry to the wafer and removing spent slurry from the wafer. Lowering the abrasives to 0.2 wt % shows beneficial effect of lowering the overall defects when compared to 1% abrasives at H2O2 levels at or below 0.4%, however at 1% H2O2 (1% aspartic acid), 0.2% abrasives delivers low Co RR, due to the passivation of cobalt as oxide/hydroxides that needs adequate mechanical abrasion to drive Co RR. Increasing the abrasives further to 1% with 1% H2O2 (1% aspartic acid slurry) provides higher Co RR. Lower abrasives provide lower defects, due to less chance of particle agglomeration and deposition on to cobalt wafers. However, it is surprising the higher abrasives at 1 wt % could deliver the lowest defect at optimum H2O2 (1 wt %) and aspartic acid (1 wt %) level.
Oxidizer (H2O2) Levels: The main function of oxidizer such as H2O2 is to oxidize the metal surface and facilitate their removal. Optimum H2O2 level is critical to balance the oxidation and mechanical removal of cobalt in the presence of chelators. With the optimum level of aspartic acid (1 wt %) and abrasives (1 wt %) in the slurry, 1 wt % H2O2 deliver the lowest defect counts and highest Co removal rates. Another possible reason for low defects with higher H2O2, is the presence of Co3+ oxides/hydroxides with 1 wt % H2O2 when compared to Co2+ oxides/hydroxides at 0.4% H2O2 resulting in better chelation of Co3+ vs. Co2+ by aspartic acid and therefore lower chance of Co redeposition along with colloidal silica causing particle type and other defects.
Complexing Agent (Aspartic Acid) Levels: The main function of complexing agents such as aspartic acid is to solubilize and chelate the oxidized metal ions and remove them from the wafer surface. From the polishing data in table 3, it can be seen that aspartic acid concentration also plays a critical role in Co RR, roughness, and defects. Addition of up to 2% aspartic acid, increases the chemical dissolution (etching) of cobalt, thereby disrupting the oxidation/chemical/mechanical removal, providing lower cobalt removal rates, and high surface roughness. Therefore, around 1 wt % aspartic acid is ideal to deliver high removal rates, low surface roughness and low defects.
TABLE 4
Slurry Aspartic Colloidal pH Co
Sample acid Silica H2O2 before Co RR Defect Ra
No. (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) H2O2 (Å/min) counts (Å)
11 1.0 0 0.4 8 36 1080 5
12 1.0 0.005 0.4 8 49 365 11
13 1.0 0.05 0.4 8 1864 4948 4
14 1.0 0.1 0.4 8 2045 2636 5
15 1.0 0.2 0.4 8 2480 7571 5
16 1.0 1.0 0.4 8 2699 9237 4
RR = Removal Rate,
Ra = Surface Roughness
Table 4 shows that a minimum of 0.05 wt % colloidal silica is necessary to provide smooth polishing conditions.
TABLE 5
Slurry Aspartic Colloidal H2O2 pH Co
Sample acid Silica (wt before Co RR Defect Ra
No. (wt %) (wt %) %) H2O2 (Å/min) counts (Å)
17 1.0 1.0 2.0 8 220 537 11
18 1.0 1.0 5.0 8 80 285 10
19 1.0 0.5 1.0 8 244 4948 9
20 1.0 2.0 1.0 8 3673 2636 5
21 1.0 5.0 1.0 8 >8000 N/A N/A
RR = removal rate,
Ra = Surface Roughness
Table 5 shows that excessive amounts of oxidizer lowers cobalt removal rate and increases surface roughness and increasing colloidal silica increases Co removal rate.
Introducing multiple complexing agents into a silica particle-containing test slurry first screened complexing agent for accelerating cobalt removal rate. A second removal rate evaluated hydrogen peroxide sensitivity by comparing removal rate at 0.4 and 1 percent hydrogen peroxide. The polishing occurred with the polishing conditions listed in Table 2 above. Table 6 below provides the removal rate and hydrogen peroxide sensitivity for multiple complexing agents.
TABLE 6
Slope
Slurry Complex. ΔCo RR/ Co RR (Å/min) vs.
Sample Complexing M.Wt. conc. Abrasive Δ% H2O2 wt % H2O2
No. Agent (g/mol) (wt %) (1 wt %) pH (0.4 to 1%) 0% 0.4% 1.0%
27 None K1501-50 8 −750 191 539 90
28 Citric acid 192 0.5 K1501-50 8 205
29 Alanine 89 0.9 K1598-B25 8 −6860 4673 540
30 Serine 105 0.8 K1598-B25 8 −5472 4030 749
31 Proline 115 0.86 K1598-B25 8 −469 756 475
32 Picolinic acid 123 0.92 K1598-B25 8 −295 1120 943
33 Asparagine 132 1.0 wt K1598-B25 8 −6523 4076 162
34 L-Aspartic acid 133 1.0 wt K1598-B25 8 −950 2987 2420
35 Glutamic acid 147 0.74 K1598-B25 8 −3758 2403 148
(GLU)
36 Histidine 155 0.78 K1598-B25 8 −5842 3977 472
37 Bicine 163 0.41 K1501-50 8 −793 1091 615
38 Nitrilotriacetic 191 0.96 K1501-50 8 −828 4476 3977
acid (NTA)
39 Nitrilotriacetic 191 0.48 K1501-50 8 1743 2842 1796
acid (NTA)
40 Nitrilotriacetic 191 0.48 K1598-B25 8 2909
acid (NTA)
41 1-hydroxyethane 1,1- 206 0.51 K1598-B25 8 −445 622 355
diphosphonic acid
(HEDP)
42 N(2hydroxyethyl) 278.3 0.70 K1598-B25 8 −1438 2054 1191
ethylenediamine-
N,N′,N′-triacetic acid
(HEDTA)
43 Nitrilotri 299 0.75 K1501-50 8 −459 187 1422 1147
(methylphosphonic acid)
(NTMP)
44 Ethylenediamine-N,N′- 358 0.90 K1501-50 8 −129 167 1384 1307
disuccinic
acid trisodium (EDDS)
45 1,2Diaminocyclohexane 364.4 0.91 K1598-B25 8 −12 71 64
tetraacetic acid
Monohydrate (DCTA)
46 Ethylene glycol-bis 380.4 0.95 K1598-B25 8 −185 2083 1972
(2aminoethylether)-
N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic
acid (EGTA)
47 Diethylenetriamine 393 0.98 K1598-B25 8 1445 207 677 1544
pentaacetic acid
(DTPA)
K1598-B25 = 35 nm average diameter colloidal silica;
K1501-50 = 80 nm average diameter colloidal silica
The removal rate slope, ΔCo RR/Δ wt % H2O2 was calculated as follows:
ΔCo RR/Δ wt % H2O2=(Co RR in Å/min at 0.4 wt % H2O2−Co RR in Å/min at 1.0 wt % H2O2)/(0.4 wt %−1.0 wt %) RR=Removal Rate
From the above, L-aspartic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, nitrilotri(methylphosphonic acid), ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid trisodium salt, and ethylene glycol-bis (2aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid all have sufficient removal cobalt rate in combination with good rate stability with change in H2O2 from 0.4 to 1.0 wt %. Alanine, serine, asparagine, glutamic acid and histidine all have hydrogen peroxide rate slope between 0.4 and 1.0 wt % hydrogen peroxide of in excess of 3700 or too high of a rate sensitivity for stable polishing performance at 1 wt % abrasives and pH 8. Most preferably, the complexing agent is L-aspartic acid.
The polishing slurry provides an unconventional combination of oxidizer, conjoined spherical silica particles and rate-stable complexing agent to provide a high rate slurry capable of polishing cobalt and cobalt-containing semiconductor features. It removes these features with lower defects by increasing oxidation of Co0 to Co+3 in combination with a higher particle load during polishing. Furthermore, the complexing agent has limited rated variation with the Co0 to Co+3 oxidation of the invention.

Claims (8)

The invention claimed is:
1. An aqueous slurry useful for chemical Mechanical polishing a semiconductor substrate having cobalt or cobalt alloy containing features containing Co0 comprising:
0.4 to 1.0 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent (α),
0.5 to 3 wt % colloidal silica particles (β), the colloidal silica particles containing primary particles, the primary particles having an average diameter of 25 to 50 nm linked together in conjoined spherical structures, the conjoined spherical structures having an average length of 40 to 80 nm,
20 ppm to 2.2 wt % adenine cobalt corrosion inhibitor,
0.5 to 2 wt % complexing agent (γ) where (γ) consists of L-aspartic acid,
and balance water having a pH of 5 to 9 wherein oxidation potential of the slurry is sufficient to oxidize at least a portion of the Co0 to Co+3 and wherein the total concentrations remain within the following formulae as follows:

wt % (α)+wt % (β)=1 to 4 wt % for polishing the cobalt or cobalt alloy;

wt % (γ)≤2*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and

wt % (β)+wt % (γ)≤3*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and
wherein slope of cobalt removal rate (Å/min) is from 0 to ˜1050 (Å/min)/wt % H2O2 for a cobalt blanket wafer when increasing the hydrogen peroxide (α) from 0.4 to 1.0 wt % when polishing with a polyurethane polishing pad having a Shore D hardness of 57, closed cell pores with an average diameter between 30 and 60 μm and circular grooves having a depth, width and pitch of 760, 510and 3,050 μm, respectively at a downforce of 2 psi (13.8 kPa), 93 rpm platen speed, 87 rpm carrier speed with a slurry at 200 ml/min having 35 nm or 80 nm average diameter colloidal silica particles when using a diamond conditioner at a polish time of 10 to 60 seconds.
2. The aqueous slurry of claim 1 wherein the wt % (α)+wt % (β)=1.5 to 3.5 wt %.
3. The aqueous slurry of claim 1 wherein the pH is 7 to 9.
4. The aqueous slurry of claim 1 wherein the pH is 5 to 7.
5. An aqueous slurry useful for chemical mechanical polishing a semiconductor substrate having cobalt or cobalt alloy containing features containing Co0 comprising:
0.4 to 1.0 wt % hydrogen peroxide oxidizing agent (α),
0.75 to 2 wt % colloidal silica particles (β), the colloidal silica particles containing primary particles, the primary particles having an average diameter of 25 to 50 nm and linked together in conjoined spherical structures, the conjoined spherical structures having an average length of 40 to 80 nm,
20 ppm to 0.8 wt % adenine cobalt corrosion inhibitor,
0.75 to 1.5 wt % complexing agent (γ) where (γ)consists of L-aspartic acid,
and balance water having a pH of 5 to 9 wherein oxidation potential of the slurry is sufficient to oxidize at least a portion of the Co0 to Co+3 and wherein the total concentrations remain within the following formulae as follows:

wt % (α)+wt % (β)=1.5 to 3 wt % for polishing the cobalt or cobalt alloy;

wt % (γ)≤1.5*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and

wt % (β)+wt % (γ)≤2.5*wt % (α) for limiting static etch of the cobalt or cobalt alloy; and
wherein slope of cobalt removal rate (Å/min) is from 0 to ˜1050 (Å/min)/wt % H2O2 for a cobalt blanket wafer when increasing the hydrogen peroxide (α) from 0.4 to 1.0 wt % when polishing with a polyurethane polishing pad having a Shore D hardness of 57, closed cell pores with, an average diameter between 30 and 60 μm and circular grooves having a depth, width and pitch of 760, 510and 3,050 μm, respectively at a downforce of 2 psi (13.8 kPa), 93 rpm platen speed, 87 rpm carrier speed with a slurry at 200 ml/min having 20 nm or 80 nm average diameter colloidal silica particles when using a diamond conditioner at a polish time of 10 to 60 seconds.
6. The aqueous slurry of claim 5 wherein the wt % (α) wt % (β)=2 to 3 wt %.
7. The aqueous slurry of claim 5 wherein the pH is 7 to 9.
8. The aqueous slurry of claim 5 wherein the pH is 5 to 7.
US15/450,139 2017-03-06 2017-03-06 Polishing slurry for cobalt-containing substrate Active US10233356B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/450,139 US10233356B2 (en) 2017-03-06 2017-03-06 Polishing slurry for cobalt-containing substrate

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/450,139 US10233356B2 (en) 2017-03-06 2017-03-06 Polishing slurry for cobalt-containing substrate

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180254193A1 US20180254193A1 (en) 2018-09-06
US10233356B2 true US10233356B2 (en) 2019-03-19

Family

ID=63355784

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/450,139 Active US10233356B2 (en) 2017-03-06 2017-03-06 Polishing slurry for cobalt-containing substrate

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US10233356B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11545365B2 (en) * 2019-05-13 2023-01-03 Chempower Corporation Chemical planarization

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090209103A1 (en) * 2006-02-03 2009-08-20 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Barrier slurry compositions and barrier cmp methods
US20130140273A1 (en) 2011-07-05 2013-06-06 Haisheng Lu Slurry for chemical mechanical polishing of cobalt
US20130186850A1 (en) 2012-01-24 2013-07-25 Applied Materials, Inc. Slurry for cobalt applications
US20140243250A1 (en) 2013-02-28 2014-08-28 Fujimi Incorporated Polishing slurry for cobalt removal
US8980750B2 (en) 2012-07-06 2015-03-17 Basf Se Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) composition comprising a non-ionic surfactant and a carbonate salt
WO2016008896A1 (en) 2014-07-15 2016-01-21 Basf Se A chemical mechanical polishing (cmp) composition
US20160027657A1 (en) 2014-07-25 2016-01-28 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) of Colbalt-Containing Substrate
US20160068710A1 (en) 2014-09-05 2016-03-10 Fujifilm Planar Solutions, LLC Polishing compositions and methods for polishing cobalt films
US20160108286A1 (en) 2014-10-21 2016-04-21 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Slurry for chemical mechanical polishing of cobalt
US20160107289A1 (en) 2014-10-21 2016-04-21 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Corrosion inhibitors and related compositions and methods
US20160108285A1 (en) 2014-10-21 2016-04-21 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Cobalt dishing control agents
US20160115353A1 (en) 2014-10-21 2016-04-28 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Cobalt polishing accelerators
WO2016102279A1 (en) 2014-12-22 2016-06-30 Basf Se Use of a chemical mechanical polishing (cmp) composition for polishing of cobalt and / or co-balt alloy comprising substrates
US9528030B1 (en) 2015-10-21 2016-12-27 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Cobalt inhibitor combination for improved dishing
WO2017025536A1 (en) 2015-08-12 2017-02-16 Basf Se Use of a chemical mechanical polishing (cmp) composition for polishing of cobalt comprising substrates

Patent Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090209103A1 (en) * 2006-02-03 2009-08-20 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Barrier slurry compositions and barrier cmp methods
US20130140273A1 (en) 2011-07-05 2013-06-06 Haisheng Lu Slurry for chemical mechanical polishing of cobalt
US20130186850A1 (en) 2012-01-24 2013-07-25 Applied Materials, Inc. Slurry for cobalt applications
US8980750B2 (en) 2012-07-06 2015-03-17 Basf Se Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) composition comprising a non-ionic surfactant and a carbonate salt
US20140243250A1 (en) 2013-02-28 2014-08-28 Fujimi Incorporated Polishing slurry for cobalt removal
WO2016008896A1 (en) 2014-07-15 2016-01-21 Basf Se A chemical mechanical polishing (cmp) composition
US20160027657A1 (en) 2014-07-25 2016-01-28 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) of Colbalt-Containing Substrate
US20160189976A1 (en) 2014-09-05 2016-06-30 Fujifilm Planar Solutions, LLC Polishing compositions and methods for polishing cobalt films
US20160068710A1 (en) 2014-09-05 2016-03-10 Fujifilm Planar Solutions, LLC Polishing compositions and methods for polishing cobalt films
US20160108286A1 (en) 2014-10-21 2016-04-21 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Slurry for chemical mechanical polishing of cobalt
US20160107289A1 (en) 2014-10-21 2016-04-21 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Corrosion inhibitors and related compositions and methods
US20160108285A1 (en) 2014-10-21 2016-04-21 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Cobalt dishing control agents
US20160115353A1 (en) 2014-10-21 2016-04-28 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Cobalt polishing accelerators
WO2016102279A1 (en) 2014-12-22 2016-06-30 Basf Se Use of a chemical mechanical polishing (cmp) composition for polishing of cobalt and / or co-balt alloy comprising substrates
WO2017025536A1 (en) 2015-08-12 2017-02-16 Basf Se Use of a chemical mechanical polishing (cmp) composition for polishing of cobalt comprising substrates
US9528030B1 (en) 2015-10-21 2016-12-27 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Cobalt inhibitor combination for improved dishing

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 15/450,170.

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11545365B2 (en) * 2019-05-13 2023-01-03 Chempower Corporation Chemical planarization

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20180254193A1 (en) 2018-09-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
TWI669359B (en) Low dishing copper chemical mechanical planarization
KR101069472B1 (en) Method for chemical mechanical planarization of chalcogenide materials
KR101031446B1 (en) Method for Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Chalcogenide Materials
KR101005304B1 (en) Tantalum Barrier Removal Solution
JP5539934B2 (en) Chemical mechanical polishing slurry useful for copper substrate
US8338303B2 (en) Polishing liquid
US8222145B2 (en) Method and composition for chemical mechanical planarization of a metal-containing substrate
US20060163206A1 (en) Novel polishing slurries and abrasive-free solutions having a multifunctional activator
JP2004502860A (en) Ready-to-use stable chemical mechanical polishing slurry
KR20020016596A (en) Polishing composition and polishing method employing it
US8841216B2 (en) Method and composition for chemical mechanical planarization of a metal
US20070249167A1 (en) CMP method for copper-containing substrates
US10377921B2 (en) Chemical mechanical polishing method for cobalt
US10170335B1 (en) Chemical mechanical polishing method for cobalt
CN108250977A (en) A kind of chemical mechanical polishing liquid for barrier layer planarization
US10077382B1 (en) Method for polishing cobalt-containing substrate
US20090061630A1 (en) Method for Chemical Mechanical Planarization of A Metal-containing Substrate
US10233356B2 (en) Polishing slurry for cobalt-containing substrate
US10947413B2 (en) Chemical mechanical polishing method for cobalt with high cobalt removal rates and reduced cobalt corrosion
WO2021067151A1 (en) Low dishing copper chemical mechanical planarization
US7368066B2 (en) Gold CMP composition and method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ROHM AND HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS CMP HOLDINGS, I

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:THEIVANAYAGAM, MURALI G.;WANG, HONGYU;REEL/FRAME:041486/0018

Effective date: 20170307

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: DUPONT ELECTRONIC MATERIALS HOLDING, INC., DELAWARE

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ROHM & HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS CMP HOLDINGS INC.;REEL/FRAME:069274/0160

Effective date: 20240401