TW201530518A - Operating method for jurisprudence test library with essay type multiple choice question groups - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention provides an operating method for jurisprudence test library with essay type multiple choice question groups, which allows a server end to evaluate jurisprudence literacy of a user. The jurisprudence test library includes a plurality of essay type multiple choice question groups. Each of the question groups includes a plurality of multiple choice questions related to each other, and each of the multiple choice questions includes a plurality of choices. Each of the question groups includes at least one choice belonging to a basic law category, one choice belonging to a theory category and one choice belonging to a practice judgment category. The operating method of the test library includes the following steps: (a) accepting network connection of the user and recording the user's identity; (b) selecting a plurality of question groups from the test library to form a simulation exam; (c) accepting and checking the answers of the user within a predetermined time; and (d) adding each of the choices of each multiple choice question of the selected question groups.

Description

Method of operation of law question bank with Shenxu multiple choice question group

The invention relates to a method for operating a question bank, in particular to a law question bank with a set of multiple choice questions.

Since ancient times, the popular examinations for selecting talents have often led to the situation in which the world’s talents are crowded. Looking at today's lawyer exams, the current admission rate is about one to two percent; the national judicial exams are particularly fierce, the total admission rate has been below 5%, and the judicial admission rate is only 2 to 3%. . Therefore, many law students have been studying for four years, but they are still unable to emerge in the fiercely competitive lawyers and judicial officers. Therefore, the tutoring courses for legal persons have been constantly innovating. Due to the large number of legal persons to be tested, the legal subjects have almost become the focus of each cram school. However, in the trend of generalization of tutoring, the chances of legal persons who have tutored stand out are still not high.

The traditional examination will mainly estimate the distribution curve of a scholastic ability according to the normal distribution of the candidates, and use this as a benchmark to set the difficulty of the examination questions and the criteria for taking the exam. Especially when it comes out, it is best to set the degree of discrimination near a predetermined standard line, so that candidates who take the standard can clearly distinguish the difference. For example, if you want to enroll 5% or 10%, you must let the scholastic ability The degree of discrimination of candidates is increased, and the identification of candidates in the latter stage is relatively unimportant. In other words, to pass such an exam, you must evaluate your weaknesses more effectively and reinforce them.

Moreover, jurisprudence itself is not a single aspect, and any topic often includes different The co-opetition of legal relationships, including the understanding and familiarity of the text of the legal text, requires more practical insights such as jurisprudence or interpretation by the judges, and even the insights of the family, can be practically applied to the case without errors, and obtained in the examination. High score. Therefore, no matter whether it is memorization, logical analysis and in-depth understanding, it is indispensable. However, the candidates are often limited by their own abilities and preferences. They can only be started with some expertise, and it is not easy to take into account the whole picture.

On the other hand, even if the practice is constantly practiced and the archaeological questions are solved, for some candidates with different abilities, some expertise tends to be too simple and not challenging; relatively, the parts that are not good are often overwhelmed, so too Partial waste. Unless there is extraordinary perseverance or chance, long-term self-study courses and mock exams will make candidates unable to raise interest. As for the workshops, although they are known as professional, the courses, schedules and examinations for the group are easy to ignore the differences between individuals, and individual sacrifices are needed to accommodate groups. It is not only difficult to create an inclusive and friendly learning environment. It does not inspire the innate learning potential of each individual, and public opinion reinforces their respective shortcomings.

In addition, the traditional teaching method transforms the self-confidence, interest and life vision that can be accompanied by learning into stress or burden, which is boring and inflexible; making the psychological "positive feedback" mentality difficult to produce, difficult Turn courses and exams into an endless stream of learning. At the same time, the traditional teaching methods often blame the problem of poor learning, the students are not motivated, the willpower is not enough, and in the long run, students are easy to rise up to avoid the escape of learning.

According to modern technology, there are a variety of electronic test questions on the Internet, which can be automatically arranged. Of course, you can also consider the computer calculation method, with all candidates as the mother sample, dynamically obtain the candidate's scholastic ability and the answer rate of each question. It is even possible to adjust the difficulty level so that the students are in the proper challenge at the moment, neither will be frustrated in the examination process, nor will they be arrogant, thus solving the problem of traditional teaching.

However, for the examinations related to legal methods, the general electronic question bank cannot handle complex changes because of the inability to process complex logic judgments, so it is impossible to conduct deeper, more oriented, comprehensive learning and tests, which also makes the law test Common examples such as the topic, can not be easily electronic, networked and personalized.

On the contrary, the current legal examinations of the legal subjects, most of the legal examination questions are presented in the form of thesis. The reason for this is that many legal concepts criss-cross each other, and the legal logic behind one thing can be very broad. Take the common legal case judgment as an example. From time to time, a judge needs a thick judgment to be able to clearly express the ins and outs of the case, the place of the dispute, the application of the law, and the legal logic and evidence behind the judgment. Therefore, when considering the qualifications of prospective judges and lawyers in the future, it may be necessary to test the basic arguments, practical mastery, academic mastery, answering techniques or breaking powers in a topic, or to divide across multiple legal fields; The leader who has the depth and breadth of the leaps and bounds jumps out of the sea.

Based on the complexity of the application, the examiner's subjective opinions are difficult to replace with the mechanized program when scrutinizing and marking. How to deconstruct the topic group, grasp the constituent elements of the connotation in the examination questions, and integrate many elements with the computer program, so that the application group is compatible with the electronic question bank, making the program calculation and correction possible, and getting rid of the subjective wisdom of the teacher. Dependence is the focus of this case. If this problem can be effectively solved, it will be highly dependent on the subject of the topic or the open-type questions such as compound and pluralism, such as law and humanities, etc., which can provide online or electronic teaching from a customized and stylized perspective. Further improve learning efficiency, reduce labor costs in education, and meet the needs of individual candidates, improve the defects of traditional teaching and group courses, so that the quality of education is further improved and electronic, so that the country's century-old tree people and scientific and technological progress complement each other.

An object of the present invention is to provide a method for operating a law question bank with a set of multiple-choice questions, so that the title of the topic can be electronically questioned, and the dependence on the complex logic and wisdom of human beings can be obtained.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for operating a law question bank with a set of multiple-choice questions, and to provide customized questions and courses according to different users, so that each user can develop knowledge in the most friendly environment.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for operating a law question bank with a set of multiple-choice questions, which provides an objective intermediate value through computer calculation, and the user can avoid the gap between the test questions and the difficulty of the course.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for operating a law question bank with a set of multiple-choice questions, and to program at least three forces of the five-force of the law.

In order to achieve the above purpose, the present invention provides a method for operating a law question bank with a set of multiple choice questions for a server to evaluate the legal literacy of at least one user, wherein the aforementioned law question bank includes a plurality of multiple choice questions. The foregoing question group respectively includes multiple choice questions which are associated with each other, each of the foregoing multiple choice questions respectively includes a plurality of options, and at least one of each of the foregoing question groups belongs to a basic law category, and an option belongs to a doctrine class. And an option belongs to the substantive judgment class. The above operation method includes the following steps: a) accepting the network connection of the above user and recording its identity; b) extracting the above question group from the above question bank to form a mock test question. (c) accepting and checking the answers of the above-mentioned users within a predetermined time; d) summing each of the above options of each of the above-mentioned multiple-choice questions of the above-mentioned selected question group to evaluate the legal strength and level of the candidates.

Through the case, the method of operating the law question bank with the plethora of multiple choice questions is revealed. Select the question group, pick out the elements of the topic, and integrate at least one of the five forces of law into at least one corresponding multiple-choice question, with appropriate choice of topic design and program use steps, so that the title type electronic question bank is replaced, and artificial wisdom is excluded. The non-benign impact of the course and exam questions, and allows users to learn and grow in a customized and friendly environment.

101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109‧‧‧ steps

10‧‧‧Basic argument

11‧‧‧ Practical mastery

12‧‧‧ Academic Mastery

13‧‧‧

14‧‧ ‧ answering skills

31‧‧‧Central processing unit

33‧‧‧ memory device

35‧‧‧Network connection device

51‧‧‧Control device

53‧‧‧Output/input device

55‧‧‧Network communication device

1 is a schematic diagram of a first preferred embodiment of the present invention for explaining a motif of a set of multiple choice question groups; FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the first preferred embodiment of the present invention for explaining the law bank of the present invention FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a first preferred embodiment of the present invention for illustrating a connection relationship between main structures of the present invention; FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a first preferred embodiment of the present invention for illustrating a radar chart The situation.

The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from Similar to the reference number. When the implementation of the case is explained, the specific legal application will be explained as an example to improve the clarity of the explanation.

In the judicial examination, the five most important abilities are basic argumentation, academic mastery, practical mastery, answering techniques and breaking power. Therefore, when the test questions are to be revised, the above five forces must be integrated, and the overall scores of individual candidates can be identified. The law question bank of the first preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a plurality of application-based multiple-choice questions, each of which includes a plurality of related multiple-choice questions, and the multiple-choice questions have multiple options. The purpose of the multiple-choice question is to cut the elements of the original topic independently. The elements are, for example, the above five forces, and the elements of these claims are respectively assigned to the multiple choice questions and options of at least one question.

Among them, the so-called basic law in this case corresponds to the basic argument of Wu Lizhong in this case; the practical judgment here is the practical mastery; the theory of the theory is the academic mastery. The application title (hereinafter referred to as the motif) used in the first preferred embodiment is quoted from the title of P.87 of the 11th issue of the "Chaofa Lecture Hall" published by the applicant 2013.04. The motif is shown in Figure 1. Referring to the flowchart 2 and the block diagram 3, when the user end is connected to the server of the law library through the network communication device 55, the network connection device 35 on the server side is accepted in step 101. The network is connected to the network and the central processing unit 31 transmits its identity record to the memory device 33. In step 102, the central processing unit 31 extracts the sets of the sets of the multiple-question multiple-choice questions from the legal question bank stored in the memory device 33 to form a simulated test question, which is transmitted back to the user through the network connection device 35. The network communication device 55 at the end is presented to the user by the control device 51 of the user terminal through an output/input device 53 which is interpreted as a computer screen. Among them, the topical multiple-choice group is to select the title (mother) in Figure 1 as shown below:

101 years of lawyers college entrance examination topic example - five strength analysis method

1. Breaking power; 2. Basic argumentation; 3. Academic mastery; 4. Practical mastery; 5. Answering skills, and giving separate points (for example, 20% each) (■ represents the correct answer that should be checked by default; Checked answer)

(1) Breaking power: (20%)

(1) What issues are mainly covered in this topic:

■Administrative Procedure Law

■Urban planning method

■ Appeal Law

■Administrative Procedure Law

□ Administrative enforcement law

□ Civil Procedure Law

(2) This question relates to relevant issues in administrative law:

■Administrative plan

■Administrative sanctions

■Regulatory order

□ Administrative rules

□Administrative guidance

■ Administrative litigation

(2) Basic argument: (20%)

(1) What is the legal nature of Plan A in this question:

■Regulatory order

□Administrative sanctions

□Administrative guidance

□ administrative plan

(2) What is the object of the urban plan change in this question?

■ Land

□ the person who is subject to disposition or benefit or is not interested

(3) What is the legal nature of the feedback obligation of Plan A in this question:

□Regulatory order

■Administrative payment

□Administrative guidance

□ administrative plan

(4) What is the purpose of the feedback obligation of Plan A in this question and what should be noted?

■ In order to benefit the urban plan change, the land can be returned to promote the development of the city plan.

■ The principle of “unfair link prohibition” in Article 94 of the Administrative Procedure Law should be considered.

(5) Is the reward obligation of Plan A in this question an exclusive obligation? Can it be transferred to others?

■ No, it can be transferred.

□ Yes, it is not allowed to transfer.

(6) Is the F letter in this question an administrative penalty?

□ Yes, the nature of the F letter is that the administrative agency unilaterally targets the specific events on public law and has administrative effects on the outside.

■ No, the F letter only reiterates that the disputed reward obligation exists between B and the municipal government. It does not create a new legal relationship with public law. It is not legal and should be a “notice of concept”.

(7) Does B have a duty to file a compulsory license for the C license, and request the municipal government to make administrative sanctions, and change the name of the C license from A to B?

■ No. Because of the legal relationship of C license, it exists between the government of Jiahe City.

□Yes. Since the C license has been sold from A to B, the name of the person is of course transferred.

(8) Does B have to revoke the C license obtained by A?

■ No. Because the C license is the benefit of the relatives of the A, the right of B is not due to C The license is infringed, and there is no "right of litigation".

□Yes. Since the C license has been sold from A to B, if the existence of C's existence affects the interests of B should be ruled out, B must file a revocation to defend its rights.

(3) Academic mastery: (20%)

(1) What are the following controversial issues in the system of reimbursement for urban planning?

■Reward items meet the needs of the current situation

■Rewarding land and facilities for proper management

■Is the calculation method of feedback gold reasonable?

■ Does the reward system effectively protect social justice?

□ Does the reward give the burden on the beneficiary?

■ Do you need a pre-hearing procedure?

(4) Practical mastery: (20%)

(1) This question is explained with the following judges. Can it be quoted when answering this question?

□ Interpretation 148

■ Release 156

□ release 406

□ release 409

□ release word 513

(2) What is the nature of the behavior of the competent authority in changing the urban plan?

□ Administrative actions that require the cooperation of the parties.

■ Administrative actions of unilateral public law.

□ Administrative guidance.

■ Administrative plan.

(3) Does the competent authority change the urban plan, and if it directly restricts the rights, interests or burdens of the people in a certain area, is it therefore of an administrative sanction?

■Yes

□No

(4) If the competent authority changes the urban plan, if it causes the specific person or the majority of the determined majority to suffer improper or illegal damage, can administrative remedies be instituted?

■ Yes, you still have to file administrative remedies in accordance with the law of law and administrative law.

□ No, because this is only a reflection benefit, and no relief can be brought.

(5) Answering skills: (20%)

(1) Regarding the conclusion of this question, which of the following is appropriate:

□ The object of this urban plan change is the actor, and there is a violation of Article 94 of the Administrative Procedure Law, “The Principle of Improper Connection Prohibition”

■ In this case, the municipal government is a comprehensive review of the urban plan, so the nature of the A plan is a regulatory order.

■ Individual changes to the urban plan, the municipal government has discretionary authority, and after the change, it is self-sufficient to add payment on the change item.

■ The object of the change of the urban plan is the land. The purpose of the reward obligation is not an exclusive obligation, and this reward obligation is the “state responsibility” born according to the urban plan. Since B is already in the position of developer of B, he should bear this obligation of feedback.

□F letter is an administrative sanction, but in fact it is a duplicate of the nature, so B still has to file an administrative remedy for the F letter.

□F letter is a refusal of E to send a letter to the municipal government, so it has Article 5, item 2 of the Administrative Procedure Law. “People are dismissed by the central or local authorities for their legally applied cases, and their rights or laws are considered. If the above-mentioned interests are damaged by lawsuits, B may, in the case of the lawsuit, submit to the administrative court the form of the lawsuit that the agency should be an administrative action or an administrative action that should be a specific content.

■ The content of B's dispute is the legal relationship of public law that advocates the reward conditions of B. It is established between A and the municipal government and not between the municipal government. This is a question of whether the legal relationship in the public law is disputed. Therefore, B should file a confirmation of the A plan in accordance with Article 6 (1) of the Administrative Litigation Law, “Confirmation that B’s obligation to deal with land repatriation does not exist”.

For the simplicity of the description, only one of the multiple-choice multiple-choice questions will be described. First, take the basic argument of a question as an example to illustrate how the subject tests the basic knowledge of the user. The title is quoted as follows:

1. What is the legal nature of the project?

■Regulatory orders □Administrative sanctions □Administrative guidance □Administrative plan

The basic argument is to test the candidates' understanding of the basic legal concepts. Therefore, the design of the topic will be more biased towards definitional or basic legal concepts to test the degree of scholarship. In this topic, examine whether the user is aware of the laws of the above four administrative procedures. Based on the tests of such topics, it is possible to know whether the user's basic knowledge of the law is sufficient. In this topic, the user must first determine the so-called "A Project" in the motif, that is, "change the updated bamboo city plan. The "Review Case" is based on the Urban Planning Law. Therefore, the "A Project" is a regulatory nature. The "Regulatory Order" in the Option is in accordance with the provisions of Article 150 of the Administrative Procedure Law of the Republic of China. "The legal order referred to in this Law refers to the legal effect of the administrative agency's authorization on the general matters of the majority of unspecified people. The rule is that it is known that the answer is "regulatory order."

Take an academic question as an example to illustrate how the multiple-choice question can detect the user's familiarity with the legal doctrine. The topics are as follows:

1. What are the controversial issues with the urban project's reward system?

■Reward the project to meet the needs of the current situation ■Return the land and facilities to be properly managed

□ Does the reward for the burden of the beneficiary? ■ Whether the hearing procedure is required

■Is the calculation method of feedback gold reasonable? ■Is the reward system effective in maintaining social fairness and justice?

The assessment of this question is intended to be whether the user knows what conclusions or arguments are made about the disputes or issues involved in the multiple-choice questions. In addition, due to the diversified discussion of legal and academic differences, the opinions of each other may not be the same. Through this divergent discussion space, it is possible to test whether the user has sufficient mastery of academic development and whether he can independently think about his own subjective opinions on relevant issues. For example, in this question, deliberately on the theme of "the reward system involved in urban planning", the relevant opinions on the doctrine are listed for users to judge and choose.

In addition to the above two forces of the corresponding basic disciplines, there are practical practical questions to grasp this practical operation. The so-called practical mastery is to test the conclusions or arguments of the subjects on the issues or issues involved in the relevant questions in the judicial practice, such as the interpretation of the meeting of the judges, the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, and judgments. In addition to the practical grasp, the pre-existing practical views are first analyzed manually, and the sub-question method is designed for candidates to judge the test subject's ability to answer questions. Since the practical questions listed in this case are related to each other, if they are too long and too long, they will affect the writing. Lee, so please refer to page 4 (4) for a series of practical exercises. The questions involved in this question are mainly explained in the essay No. 156 of the meeting of the Chief Justice. The first question is the memory topic, and the second to fourth questions are the questions in the 156th question. To test the judgment of the user.

In addition, it is necessary to specifically mention that when answering the topic, the direction of the answer and the correctness of the discussion have always been one of the key points of the score; that is, the power of the five forces. The ability to break the test is to test the candidate's ability to judge the nature of the question. That is, when the candidate sees the problem, after a short period of thinking, he can judge the general direction of the question to be tested, and can decide the direction of the next question. If the candidate can't grasp the problem, he can judge that the candidate may not be able to answer the question accurately, or he may not be able to grasp the relevant direction of the question. However, the scoring judgment of the title is usually dependent on the examiner's human intelligence. After reviewing the full text, it is generally difficult to use the program assessment instead. Therefore, in this case, the problem of the power of the five forces is taken as an example. The appropriate multiple-choice questions are selected to explain how the case is selected by the topic group and then stylized to provide an alternative method for manpower.

A multiple-choice question about breaking power is as follows:

1. What questions are involved in this topic (problem)?

□ Administrative Procedure Law □ Urban Planning Law □ Law of Appeal

□ Administrative Litigation Law □ Administrative Enforcement Law □ Civil Procedure Law

The design of this multiple-choice question is used to test the user's judgment on the direction of the problem. When the user finishes the topic, it should basically be able to judge the areas covered by the subject in the areas of administrative procedure law, urban planning law, appeal law, administrative litigation law and so on. If you choose the "Administrative Enforcement Law", you will see that the user's concept is a little vague, and it is still impossible to accurately grasp the subject; if the user obviously concerns the subject of public law disputes, he has chosen a completely unrelated "Civil Procedure Law". The law question bank can judge that the subject is still unable to clearly distinguish the relationship between public law and civil law, and belongs to the basic common sense of law. At this time, the design of the distribution should be given a more serious deduction, and the user cannot obtain a high score in the project. And because the motif design shown in Figure 1 deliberately involves different legal aspects, the user's legal basics are checked by means of a check. In this way, each user has a good understanding of the meaning of the topic, the server has enough information to judge.

If it is still necessary to further confirm the user's mastery of the problem-solving details, or the course pays special attention to the training of the problem-solving power, the law-based question bank can select some more specific multiple-choice questions for the same topic. When the answer to question 1 is completed, the following second question appears:

2. What related issues in administrative law are involved in this question (mother)?

□ Administrative Plan □ Administrative Discipline □ Regulatory Order

■Administrative Rules ■Administrative Guidance □ Administrative Litigation

This multiple-choice question is also a multiple-choice question. Of course, the multiple-choice question is not a technical limitation of the case. Among the above six answers, except for "Administrative Rules" and "Administrative Guidance", the remaining four are the correct options. Therefore, users are limited to more detailed answer options.

In addition to breaking the power of the five forces, the judgment of answering skills is also quite dependent on human intelligence. The so-called answering skills are intended to test the extent of the candidates' advanced legal concepts. Through the narrative of the text, the case allows the user to judge whether the legal concept of the inference and the discussion of the words in the option conform to the relevant legal provisions or methods of argumentation, and it is better to judge whether the legal degree of the candidate is solid. In addition, you can set up a sub-topic corresponding to the title, inheritance, transfer, and combination of the article, and then sub-molecular questions (either single or multiple-choice questions); or mix all sub-questions together, to complex The way the topic is chosen allows the user to judge whether the text is correct or not. The more options, the more complex the narrative, the more the sub-questions are combined, the closer to a complete narrative. And when it comes to the way of re-election, it is difficult to improve the problem; to test and train the user's ability to combine and express legal logic.

Examples of answering techniques are as follows:

1. Regarding the conclusion of this question, which of the following is appropriate:

□ The object of this urban plan change is the actor, and there is a violation of Article 94 of the Administrative Procedure Law, “The Principle of Improper Connection Prohibition”

■ In this case, the municipal government is a comprehensive review of the urban plan, so the nature of the A plan is a regulatory order.

■ Individual changes to the urban plan, the municipal government has discretionary authority, and after the change, it is self-sufficient to add payment on the change item.

■ The object of the change of the urban plan is the land. The purpose of the reward obligation is not an exclusive obligation, and this reward obligation is the “state responsibility” born according to the urban plan. Since B is already in the position of developer of B, he should bear this obligation of feedback.

□F letter is an administrative sanction, but in fact it is a duplicate of the nature, so B still has to file an administrative remedy for the F letter.

□F letter is a refusal of E to send a letter to the municipal government, so it has Article 5, item 2 of the Administrative Procedure Law. “People are dismissed by the central or local authorities for their legally applied cases, and their rights or laws are considered. If the above-mentioned interests are damaged by lawsuits, B may, in the case of the lawsuit, submit to the administrative court the form of the lawsuit that the agency should be an administrative action or an administrative action that should be a specific content.

■ The content of B's dispute is the legal relationship of public law that advocates the reward conditions of B. It is established between A and the municipal government and not between the municipal government. This is a question of whether the legal relationship in the public law is disputed. Therefore, B should file a confirmation of the A plan in accordance with Article 6 (1) of the Administrative Litigation Law, “Confirmation that B’s obligation to deal with land repatriation does not exist”.

Since the test method is a multiple-choice question, in order to avoid the option answer, the user is given a corresponding prompt. Therefore, with the way of reverse buckle, the user finds that the way of guessing is not worth the loss, and thus eliminates the hurricane of guessing the answer. For example, in this question, the answer is first mixed with other similar arguments. The user must judge whether the narrative content is correct one by one, and hold the correct logical concept to correctly answer this question.

After the user sees the multiple-choice question with the specific motif, the program proceeds to the next step 103, giving a predetermined time, the user must submit the answer within the time limit, and the server-side network connection device 35 receives the answer. The check is initiated by the central processing unit 31. Taking the second question above as an example, when the user time limit ends, only the two administrative options "administrative rules" and "administrative guidance" are selected, and the correct answer is completely deviated. After the user completes the whole simulation test, the process proceeds to step 104, and the central processing unit 31 of the server side adds the options of each multiple-choice question for each of the present-choice multiple-choice questions, gives the total score and returns it to the user. The test result is presented to the user by the output/input device 53.

At this time, the central processing unit 31 on the server side can select an appropriate coping style to respond according to a preset program. For example, if the law question bank is switched to the mode of strengthening the problem, the options for breaking the problem will be matched with more specific calculation methods, such as double double points, or the total score ratio of the problem, from 20%. Up to 40% and so on. Of course, those skilled in the art can easily infer that the work of scoring does not need to be completely undertaken by step 104, and can be dispersed. When step 103 is used to check the answer of each multiple-choice question, the score is collected by the way, and then summed in step 104. In addition, the design of the law question bank of this case can also eliminate at least one force for at least one force in the five forces; thereby saving design cost and program capacity.

In step 105, the central processing unit 31 and the memory device 33 perform a point-of-sale analysis on each option selected by the user, and may perform a drop according to the degree, or may follow the chapter. For example, the chapters in which the correct answers fall are, and the chapters in which the wrong answers are distributed. Through the preset program, the user's strengths and weaknesses are analyzed, and the user's possible review focus is proposed. Then, in step 106, since each option of the multiple-choice question is assigned to one of the five forces, the central processing unit 31 can calculate the user's selection in the matching memory device 33, and then analyze the user's five. force. And through the options of the simulated test questions, according to the five-force classification statistics as the mother number, and the user's correct answer as the numerator, draw the radar chart shown in Figure 4, in this case, 10 examples are the basic argument, 11 is Practical mastery, 12 for academic mastery, 13 for breaking power, and 14 for answering skills. In this way, the advantages and disadvantages of the user can be clearly pointed out so that the user or professional teacher can arrange an appropriate training course to improve.

Since each user is using the law question bank of the case, he must log in at step 101 and be subject to the record of the memory device 33. After the user finishes the answer and counts the score, the memory device 33 will have relevant information for the user, such as data, a drop point or a radar chart. Therefore, in step 107, the central processing unit 31 analyzes the records and provides at least one feasible training policy from the preset program, and when the same user logs in again, analyzes the customized questions according to the analysis.

For example, the strength of the user is based on the argument, and the weak item is the answering skill. However, the words at the time of the test are not satisfactory but are fatal, even if the school is not useful. Through the analysis, the law question bank of the case can capture the defects of the user, and arrange a few questions and answer questions in accordance with the preset program, and arrange some basic argument questions to reinforce. Or the user's performance has always been excellent, in order to avoid the user's temperament, based on the median value of the user's past performance, increase the difficulty of the problem, so that the user has a little frustration, stimulate the desire to learn .

The advantage of customized matching is that every student can be in the most friendly learning. In the environment, there will be no difference in the game forever, and it will not always be safe and worry-free. Occasionally encounter appropriate setbacks, and at the right time, gain confidence and satisfaction. And for the students who are excellent and inferior, they can also give appropriate learning difficulties, and don't have to sacrifice their own learning pace to cater to others.

In order to determine the user's strength level in the overall environment, the central processing device 31 can compare the user's answer result and the total score with a sample parent group in the memory device 33 to know the user. Analysis of relative capabilities. Of course, the case may further include a step 109, after each user completes the question group, the answer result is also stored by the central processing unit 31 into the memory device 33 to integrate the entire sample parent group. As a result, the sample matrix data will be increasingly rich and expanded, and the reference value and credibility will be further enhanced. Based on the sample parent group and the above-mentioned customized matching problem, the intermediate value calculated for each user is more objective and accurate. If the course and the difficulty of the exam are arranged according to this intermediate value, the user can get the best learning effect in each course and exam. Once the uncertainty of human intelligence has led to the problem that the difficulty of the course and the test questions is too large to affect the quality of learning, it is solved here.

The so-called scheduled time in the text can be adjusted according to the needs. For example, it is necessary to simulate the conditions of the actual test, and the system can be set according to the time of the test such as a lawyer or a judicial officer, so that the simulation of the situation is closer to the examination room. Of course, if a customized setting is provided for an individual, it can be flexibly adjusted to the time required by the specific user. At the same time, some of the best can complete the answer in a very short time, which means that the user's strength can easily grasp a certain force in a certain test or five forces. At this time, according to the ratio of the shortened answer time, the weight calculation is performed in the radar chart of the user, which highlights the advantage of the user for subsequent scholastic analysis or learning planning. Finally, depending on the programming, once the answer is completed, the title disappears and the user cannot change it back; Let the user change back, but must face the harshness of the score and so on.

It should be noted that the order of the above steps 105 to 109 is not a limitation of the present case. For example, the steps 105 and 106 are mutually adjusted and do not affect the present case, and the step 105 may be arranged after step 103, before step 104, and step 107. You can also adjust to the last step and so on. The premise is that as long as the program allows, and the steps of the transfer do not conflict with each other and do not affect the subsequent steps, the order can be arbitrarily changed according to different needs. The above is only the preferred embodiment of the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, that is, the simple equivalent changes and modifications made by the scope of the invention and the description of the invention are It should remain within the scope of this invention.

101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109‧‧‧ steps

Claims (8)

A method for operating a law question bank with a set of multiple choice questions for a server to evaluate the legal literacy of at least one user of the user end, wherein the server end includes at least one central processing device, at least one memory device and one a network connection device, wherein the memory device stores the above-mentioned law question bank, and the foregoing law question bank includes a plurality of application-based multiple-choice questions, each of the foregoing question groups respectively including a plurality of multiple-choice question-selection questions, each of the plurality of multiple-choice questions respectively comprising a plurality of The option, and at least one of each of the foregoing question groups is a basic law class, an option belongs to the doctrine class, and an option belongs to the substantive decision class, and the user terminal includes at least one network connection to The network communication device, the control device and the output/input device of the network connection device, the operation method comprises the following steps: a) receiving, by the central processing device, the network connection of the user terminal through the network connection device, and identifying And record its identity and transfer the record to the above memory device for storage; b) by The central processing unit extracts a plurality of the above-mentioned question groups from the above-mentioned question bank stored in the memory device to form a simulated test question, and transmits information of the simulated test questions to the output/input device through the network connecting device; c) Receiving, by the central processing device, the answers of the users from the output/input device via the network connection device for a predetermined time, and checking and checking; d) summing each of the above-mentioned extracted by the central processing device Each of the above options of each of the above-mentioned multiple-choice questions of the question group provides a question-to-answer information to the above-mentioned output/input device. For example, in the method of operation of the law-based question bank of the claim-type multiple-choice question group described in claim 1, wherein each of the above-mentioned plurality of options of the above-mentioned question group includes at least one option belongs to the problem-solving class. For example, in the method of claim method of the claim type selection question group, the above plurality of options of each of the above question groups include at least one option belonging to the answering skill class. For example, in the method of claim 1, the method for operating the method of claiming the problem-selecting question group includes, after step d), the above-mentioned central processing device is matched with the memory device, and each of the multiple-choice questions is associated with the user. The answer is step e) of the point-of-sale analysis. For example, in the method of claim 1, the method for operating the method of claiming the problem-selecting question group includes, after step d), the simulation is performed by the central processing device for the user's answer result, and the memory device is used to simulate the copy. Each of the above options is classified according to the above categories as the parent number, and the step f) corresponding to the radar chart is drawn by using the option of the at least one user as the numerator. For example, in the method of claim 1, the second, the third, the fourth or the fifth, the method for operating the law question bank of the application-based multiple-choice question group further includes, after the step d), recording the record of the user by the memory device, When the user again uses the law question bank, the central processing unit performs the step g) of customizing the problem with the memory device. For example, in the method of claim 1, the second, third, fourth or fifth aspect of the patent application method, the method includes: a step h), the above-mentioned central processing device transmits the result of the user's answer through the above The memory device is compared with the same parent group to obtain the relative ability analysis of the above user. For example, in the method of claim 7, the method for operating the method of claiming the problem is to include the step i) of adding the result of the above question to the sample parent group of the memory device.