KR101227880B1 - Manufacturing diagnosis system and method on information processing of the system - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a manufacturing diagnostic system for supporting the diagnosis and evaluation of the manufacturing process of the diagnostic subject and an information processing method thereof.
The manufacturing diagnosis system includes a diagnosis group for at least one submanufacturing strategy diagnostic component corresponding to a manufacturing strategy, a diagnosis group for at least one submanufacturing tissue diagnostic component corresponding to a manufacturing tissue, and at least one corresponding to manufacturing IT. A diagnostic group for the at least one submanufacturing IT diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for at least one submanufacturing process diagnostic component corresponding to the manufacturing process, and at least one submanufacturing performance diagnostic component corresponding to manufacturing performance Transmitting the diagnostic group to a diagnostic input computer for diagnosing at least one or more diagnostic subjects; A diagnostic group for the manufacturing strategy diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing tissue diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing process diagnostic component, from the computer of the diagnostic inputter, Receiving diagnostic input information of the diagnosis subject for the diagnosis group for the manufacturing performance diagnosis component; And storing the obtained diagnostic input information and inputting the diagnostic input information into a preset manufacturing process level model, in which the manufacturing strategy, the manufacturing organization, the manufacturing IT, the manufacturing process, and the manufacturing performance are obtained. Evaluating the level of the manufacturing process of the subject to be diagnosed.
By utilizing the present invention, it is possible to easily collect data for diagnosis and evaluation of the company that is the subject of diagnosis, and to reduce the consulting cost for diagnosis and evaluation, and to perform the offline diagnosis by performing the diagnosis and evaluation online. Consulting costs are reduced compared to the method of direct personnel input and diagnosis, and it is the basis for building c-MES online based on the company's diagnosis and evaluation data.

Description

Manufacturing Diagnosis System and Method on Information Processing of the System

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a manufacturing diagnostic system and an information processing method of the system, and more particularly, to a manufacturing diagnostic system for supporting diagnosis and evaluation of a manufacturing process of a subject to be diagnosed and an information processing method of the system.

Manufacturing process diagnosis / evaluation is a comprehensive diagnosis of manufacturing process strategy, foundation, capability, and performance that a company should manage from the whole manufacturing value chain perspective to transform raw materials into value-added finished products in order to strengthen manufacturing process competitiveness. It means a system.

The purpose of the manufacturing company's process level diagnostic model is to develop a model for diagnosing and evaluating the manufacturing process level for small and medium sized manufacturing companies. It provides a diagnostic and evaluation tool that can be used as a management system to improve competitiveness, and the government provides a survey system to systematically grasp the actual status of manufacturing processes of small and medium-sized manufacturing companies before setting the direction of support policy for small and medium-sized manufacturers. This is to establish the basis for finding realistic c-MES (manufacturing execution system) introduction method in demand position, not supplier position.

To this end, the manufacturing process diagnosis / evaluation model is aimed at identifying the manufacturing process base and capability level for SMEs to strengthen their manufacturing competitiveness, and through this, derive their own management and improvement points. A manufacturing process diagnostic / evaluation model needs to be derived from an internal perspective.

The first problem to be solved by the present invention is to propose an information processing method of the manufacturing diagnostic system.

The second problem to be solved by the present invention is to propose a manufacturing diagnostic system that supports the diagnosis and evaluation of the manufacturing process of the subject.

In order to achieve the technical problem to be achieved by the present invention, in the information processing method of the manufacturing diagnostic system, the manufacturing diagnostic system corresponding to the diagnosis group, manufacturing organization for at least one or more sub-manufacturing strategy diagnostic component corresponding to the manufacturing strategy A diagnostic group for at least one submanufacturing tissue diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for at least one submanufacturing IT diagnostic component corresponding to a manufacturing IT, and at least one submanufacturing process diagnostic component corresponding to a manufacturing process Transmitting a diagnostic group for the diagnostic group and at least one sub-manufacturing performance diagnostic component corresponding to manufacturing performance to a diagnostic input computer for diagnosing the at least one diagnostic subject; A diagnostic group for the manufacturing strategy diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing tissue diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing process diagnostic component, from the computer of the diagnostic inputter, Receiving diagnostic input information of the diagnosis subject for the diagnosis group for the manufacturing performance diagnosis component; And storing the obtained diagnostic input information, and any one of the diagnostic group, at least one lower diagnostic group constituting the diagnostic group, and at least one diagnostic index constituting the lower diagnostic group with respect to the diagnostic input information. Generating evaluation information on the level of the manufacturing process of the diagnosis subject from five viewpoints of the manufacturing strategy, the manufacturing organization, the manufacturing IT, the manufacturing process, and the manufacturing performance with reference to the evaluation criteria policy information corresponding to the above. It provides a method for processing information of a manufacturing diagnostic system comprising a.

The diagnostic group for the manufacturing strategy diagnosis component is a method of establishing and promoting a manufacturing strategy and systematic management of the manufacturing strategy performance so that the manufacturing organization, manufacturing IT, and manufacturing process can be strategically converged and expressed as manufacturing performance. It is preferable to include the detailed evaluation area and the evaluation contents for diagnosing one or more.

It is preferable that the diagnosis group for the manufacturing strategy diagnosis component includes a detailed evaluation area and evaluation contents composed of at least one of manufacturing strategy establishment, manufacturing strategy promotion, and manufacturing strategy performance management.

The diagnostic group for the manufacturing tissue diagnosis component includes detailed evaluation areas and contents for diagnosing any one or more of the organizational structure and culture, the mindset of the manufacturing personnel, and the level of capability management of the manufacturing organization, which is the subject of improvement and innovation in the manufacturing process. It is preferable to include.

The diagnosis group for the manufacturing tissue diagnosis component may include a detailed evaluation area and evaluation contents including any one or more of manufacturing organization structure and culture, manufacturing personnel mind, manufacturing personnel knowledge and skills.

The diagnostic group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component includes detailed evaluation areas and contents for diagnosing at least one of the level of the IT technology itself and the level of the IT organization, such as the IT infrastructure and applications that support the improvement and innovation of the manufacturing process. It is preferable that it is.

The diagnostic group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component preferably includes a detailed evaluation area and evaluation contents composed of at least one of a manufacturing IT capability, a manufacturing IT infrastructure, and a manufacturing IT application.

The diagnostic group for the manufacturing process diagnostic component preferably includes detailed evaluation areas and contents for diagnosing any one or more of the level of improvement and innovation of the manufacturing process itself, which is a combination of manufacturing tissue resources and manufacturing IT resources. Do.

The diagnostic group for the manufacturing process diagnostic component preferably includes a detailed evaluation area and evaluation contents composed of at least one of production planning, material procurement, production process, equipment operation, inventory management, and quality control.

The diagnostic group for the manufacturing performance diagnostic component preferably includes a detailed evaluation area and contents for diagnosing the final manufacturing process performance resulting from the manufacturing process improvement and innovation.

Preferably, the diagnostic group for the manufacturing performance diagnostic component includes a detailed evaluation area and evaluation contents composed of at least one of reliability, responsiveness, flexibility, cost, and resource effects.

A diagnostic group for the manufacturing strategy diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing tissue diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing process diagnostic component, the manufacturing performance diagnostic component In the diagnostic group for, the diagnostic group has at least two subdiagnostic groups or two or more diagnostic indicator items, and the subdiagnostic group or the diagnostic indicator items may have different weights. It is preferable that it is reflected in the said evaluation.

The weight is preferably determined by applying the AHP method.

In order to achieve the technical problem to be achieved by the present invention, there is proposed a manufacturing diagnostic system characterized in that the method of any one of the above.

By utilizing the present invention, the following effects are obtained.

It is easy to collect data for diagnosis and evaluation of the company to be diagnosed, and the consulting cost for diagnosis and evaluation is reduced. In particular, by performing diagnosis and evaluation online, the consulting cost is reduced compared to the method of directly evaluating and evaluating the personnel offline. Furthermore, it is the basis for building c-MES based on the company's diagnosis and evaluation data online.

1 is a view showing an embodiment configuration of a manufacturing diagnostic system of the present invention.
2 is a view showing the configuration of an embodiment of the manufacturing strategy diagnosis group DB of the present invention.
Figure 3 is a view showing the configuration of an embodiment of the manufacturing tissue diagnostic group DB of the present invention.
4 is a view showing the configuration of an embodiment of the manufacturing IT diagnostic group DB of the present invention.
5 is a view showing the configuration of an embodiment of the manufacturing process diagnostic group DB of the present invention.
6 is a view showing the configuration of an embodiment of the production performance diagnosis group DB of the present invention.
7 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary content configuration of a manufacturing strategy diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB of the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary content configuration of a manufacturing tissue diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB of the present invention. FIG.
9 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary content configuration of a manufacturing IT diagnostic evaluation weighting policy DB of the present invention.
10 is a view showing an embodiment of the content configuration of the manufacturing process diagnostic evaluation weighting policy DB of the present invention.
FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary content configuration of a manufacturing performance diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB of the present invention. FIG.
12 is a view showing an embodiment information processing method of the manufacturing diagnostic system of the present invention.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the drawings.

As illustrated in FIG. 1, the manufacturing diagnostic system of the present invention is connected to a user computer through a wired or wireless network. The manufacturing diagnosis system essentially includes a manufacturing diagnosis engine, a manufacturing group diagnosis group DB, and a user management unit, and optionally includes a manufacturing process level evaluation engine and a manufacturing process level evaluation DB.

The manufacturing diagnosis engine may include a manufacturing diagnosis group transmitting unit which transmits information about a manufacturing diagnosis group to the user computer, a diagnosis input information obtaining unit which receives the diagnosis input information of the diagnosis subject for the diagnosis group from the user computer, and the diagnosis. The manufacturing process level of the diagnosis subject in a predetermined manner with reference to a manufacturing process diagnostic evaluation weighting policy DB including information on a weighting policy as input criteria information for evaluating a predetermined manufacturing process level. It includes a manufacturing process level evaluation engine that performs the function of evaluating.

The manufacturing group diagnosis group DB includes a manufacturing strategy diagnosis group DB including information on a diagnosis group for a manufacturing strategy diagnosis component, and a manufacturing tissue diagnosis group including information on a diagnosis group for the manufacturing tissue diagnosis component. DB, manufacturing IT diagnostic group DB including information on the diagnostic group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component, manufacturing process diagnostic group DB including information on the diagnostic group for the manufacturing process (process) diagnostic component And a manufacturing performance diagnosis group DB including information on a diagnosis group for the manufacturing performance diagnostic component.

The manufacturing process level evaluation DB includes a manufacturing strategy maturation diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB including information on maturity diagnosis evaluation for the manufacturing strategy diagnosis component, and information on the maturation diagnosis evaluation for the manufacturing tissue diagnosis component. A manufacturing IT maturity diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB, a manufacturing IT maturity evaluation evaluation weighting policy DB including information on a maturation diagnosis evaluation for the manufacturing IT diagnosis component, and a manufacturing process diagnosis component Manufacturing process maturity diagnostic evaluation weighting policy DB containing information on the maturity diagnostic evaluation of the manufacturing process, manufacturing performance maturity diagnostic evaluation weighting policy including information on the maturity diagnostic evaluation of the manufacturing performance diagnostic component DB is included.

Hereinafter, the manufacturing diagnosis group for the manufacturing diagnosis will be described in more detail. First, the diagnostic group for the sub-manufacturing strategy diagnostic components related to manufacturing strategy will be described.

Tables 1-400 are for the diagnostic groups for the lower manufacturing strategy diagnostic components. Each table consists of a diagnostic indicator, an identifier of the diagnostic indicator, a score, and a type (optional, multiple responses, etc.). The diagnostic inputter selects a score for the diagnostic group for the lower manufacturing strategy diagnostic component as shown in Table 1, and the diagnostic group for the selected submanufacturing strategy diagnostic component is obtained through the diagnostic input information obtaining unit. The data in each table below constitutes a manufacturing diagnosis group DB of the present invention, and the contents of each table constitute manufacturing diagnosis group data.

Tables 1 to 15 below are subdiagnostic groups and diagnostic indicators associated with manufacturing strategies.

Manufacturing strategy establishment-Company-wide manufacturing strategy establishment level-Diagnostic indicators-A1 score Optional (1) No manufacturing strategy 0 (2) Manufacturing strategy is established irregularly 2 (3) Manufacturing strategy is established on a regular basis (one to two years) but is not specified. 4 (4) A manufacturing strategy with a stated periodicity (one to two years) is being established. 7 (5) (4) + Strategies include non-business partners 10

Establishment of manufacturing strategy-Level of linkage between manufacturing strategy and other strategies-Linkage between company-wide management strategy and manufacturing strategy-Diagnostic indicators-A2- (1) score  Optional (1) Not linked 0 (2) generally low 2 (3) normal 4 (4) generally high 7 (5) very high 10

Establishment of manufacturing strategy-Level of linkage between manufacturing strategy and other strategies-Linkage between supply chain strategy and manufacturing strategy-Diagnostic indicators-A2- (2) score Optional (1) Not linked 0 (2) generally low 2 (3) normal 4 (4) generally high 7 (5) very high 10

Establishment of Manufacturing Strategy-Level of Linkage between Manufacturing Strategy and Other Strategies-Linkage between Customer Management Strategy and Manufacturing Strategy-Diagnostic Indicators-A2- (3) score Optional (1) Not linked 0 (2) generally low 2 (3) normal 4 (4) generally high 7 (5) very high 10

Establishment of Manufacturing Strategy-Level of Linkage between Manufacturing Strategy and Other Strategies-Linkage of Manufacturing Strategy and Information Strategy-Diagnostic Indicators-A2- (4) score  Optional (1) Not linked 0 (2) generally low 2 (3) normal 4 (4) generally high 7 (5) very high 10

Establishment of manufacturing strategy-Level of detailed strategy establishment by sector-Diagnostic indicators-A3 score  Optional (1) No company-wide manufacturing strategy and detailed strategy by sector 0 (2) Manufacturing strategy by sector exists but is not linked to each other 2 (3) The company-wide manufacturing strategy was established without sectoral adjustments, and thus could not be embodied in detailed sectoral strategies. 4 (4) Enterprise manufacturing strategy is being established through sectoral adjustment 7 (5) The company-wide manufacturing strategy was established through sectoral adjustments, and detailed in sectoral strategies. 10

Establish manufacturing strategy-Systematization level of manufacturing strategy establishment process-Diagnostic indicator-A4 score  Multiple responses (1) Develop a long-term (two to three year) strategy 2 (2) Using competitor's data in manufacturing strategy 2 (3) Conduct systematic risk analysis (financial, technical, social, and market risk factors) in the manufacturing strategy establishment process 2 (4) Considering the capabilities and limitations of processes and technologies in establishing short and long term manufacturing strategies 2 (5) Perform feedback process for review in manufacturing strategy establishment process 2 (6) Consider future competition environment and capabilities including new technologies in formulating manufacturing strategies. 2 (7) Consideration of budget in manufacturing strategy 2 * 2 points are added for each selection, and 10 points are taken for each point.

Promotion of Manufacturing Strategy-Level of Derivation of Detailed Actions on Manufacturing Strategy-Diagnostic Indicators-A5 score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Implementation of Manufacturing Strategy- Priority and Evaluation of Detailed Action Tasks for Manufacturing Strategy-Diagnostic Indicator-A6 score Optional (1) Did not derive the task (2) Identifying implementation tasks but not selecting and evaluating priorities 4 (3) Selecting and evaluating priorities by deriving implementation tasks 6 (4) Identify priorities by drawing up implementation tasks, and establish budgets, schedules, and implementation systems accordingly. 8 (5) (4) + Implementation tasks are systematically carried out by sector 10

Implementation of Manufacturing Strategy-Performance Level of Detailed Actions on Manufacturing Strategy-Diagnostic Indicator-A7 score  Optional (1) Less than 30% of plan 0 (2) More than 30% of plan 2 (3) More than 50% of plan 4 (4) More than 70% of plan 7 (5) More than 90% of plan 10

Manufacturing Strategy Performance Management-Manufacturing Strategy Performance Evaluation System Establishment and Execution Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A8 score Optional (1) No present, no future plans 0 (2) Not present but will be built 4 (3) Currently in place but not fully implemented 7 (4) Currently built and systematically running 10

Manufacturing Strategy Performance Management-Level of Goal Setting to Achieve Manufacturing Strategy-Diagnostic Indicator-A9 score Optional (1) don't set goals 0 (2) Management of the whole company only 2 (3) headquarters or factory 4 (4) department unit 6 (5) team unit 8 (6) Team subunits (by part, manpower, etc.) 10

Manufacturing Strategy Performance Management-Definition of Manufacturing Strategy Performance Measurement Indicators and Performance Management Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A10 score  Optional (1) Performance indicators are not defined 0 (2) Performance indicators are defined but are not performing performance management through them. 2 (3) Performance indicators are defined and perform individual performance management on a departmental basis. 4 (4) The performance indicators are systematically defined throughout the manufacturing sector, and performance management is carried out in the manufacturing unit. 7 (5) Performance management is defined by defining the performance indicators of key partners as well as the manufacturing unit. 10

Manufacturing Strategy Performance Management-Manufacturing Strategy Performance Evaluation Result Monitoring Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A11 score  Optional (1) No formal review work 0 (2) Some reviews and cause analysis exist only when problems occur 4 (3) formally conducts review and cause analysis but not regularly 7 (4) Generalized, regularly assessed, reviewed, and cause-analyzed 10

Manufacturing Strategy Performance Management-Manufacturing Strategy Performance Evaluation Feedback Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A12 score  Optional (1) No improvement on evaluation results 0 (2) Minimize improvement work 4 (3) Improvements are made but occur occasionally and occasionally. 7 (4) Generalized and continuous improvement works 10

Tables 16 to 56 below are subdiagnostic groups and diagnostic indicators associated with manufacturing tissue.

Manufacturing Organization Structure and Culture-Manufacturing Organization Structure Structure-Diagnostic Indicators-A13 score  Optional (1) functional (vertical) structure 2 (2) project (horizontal) structure 5 (3) Matrix (mixture of functional and project) structures 10 (4) Other Judge by response

Manufacturing Organization Structure and Culture-Manufacturing Organization R & R Establishment Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A14 score  Optional (1) very unclear 0 (2) Mostly unclear 2 (3) Normal 4 (4) generally clear 7 (5) very clear 10

Manufacturing Organization Structure and Culture-Definition of Skills and Capabilities by Role of Manufacturing Organization-Diagnostic Indicators-A15 score  Optional (1) none 0 (2) hardly defined 2 (3) briefly defined 4 (4) mostly defined 7 (5) Defined in detail by role 10

Organizational Structure and Culture-Levels of Circulation according to Work Skills and Difficulties-Diagnostic Indicators-A16 score  Optional (1) not at all 0 (2) almost not 2 (3) Yes 4 (4) generally so 7 (5) very much so 10

Manufacturing Organization Structure and Culture-Communication Level in Manufacturing Organization-Diagnostic Indicators-A17 score  Optional (1) None 0 (2) hardly progress 2 (3) proceeds to normal level 4 (4) Go above normal 7 (5) very active 10

Manufacturing Organization Structure and Culture-Mentoring Culture Level in Manufacturing Organizations-Diagnostic Indicators-A18 score  Optional (1) None 0 (2) hardly progress 2 (3) proceeds to normal 4 (4) Go above normal 7 (5) very active 10

Manufacturing Organization Structure and Culture-Organizations in charge of Manufacturing Improvement and Innovation Promotion-Diagnostic Indicators-A19 score  Optional (1) Do not carry out any improvement or innovation activities in the manufacturing sector 0 (2) Implement improvement or innovation activities in the manufacturing sector, but no separate organization 4 (3) A representative exists for each improvement or innovation activity 6 (4) Operational organization with participation of each person in charge of improvement or innovation innovation activities 8 (5) The organization to be a chief executive officer, with manufacturing department improvement or innovation support department 10

Manufacturing Organization Structure and Culture-Level of Joint Project Execution from a Manufacturing Improvement or Innovation Perspective-Diagnostic Indicators-A20 score  Optional (1) It is often promoted by specific department rather than T / F type of activity 4 (2) The part-time team is active, and a lot of authority is delegated to the practitioners. 6 (3) T / F-type activities are active and tools are used to support collaboration and community activities. 8 (4) Expanded to virtual Workpl-diagnostic indicator-Ace, enabling collaboration system anytime and anywhere 10

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Awareness Level of CEO's Awareness of Manufacturing Improvement and Innovation-Diagnostic Indicators-A21 score  Optional (1) relatively very low recognition 0 (2) low recognition 2 (3) Normal 4 (4) Highly recognized 7 (5) Very high recognition 10

Mindset of Manufacturing Workforce-The Level of CEO's Clear Manufacturing Improvement and Innovation Goals-Diagnostic Indicators-A22 score Optional (1) Does not emphasize the need for manufacturing innovation 0 (2) Emphasis is placed on the necessity of manufacturing innovation, but lack of concrete targets. 4 (3) The goal of obtaining innovation through manufacturing innovation is presented in detail, but the lack of company-wide consensus is insufficient. 7 (4) It specifically presents the goals to be obtained through manufacturing innovation, and a company-wide consensus is formed. 10

Mindset of Manufacturing Workforce-The Level of CEO's Participation in Manufacturing Improvement and Innovation Activities-Diagnostic Indicators-A23 score Optional (1) not at all 0 (2) almost not 2 (3) Yes 4 (4) generally so 7 (5) very so 10

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Executives' Manufacturing Improvement and Innovation Awareness and Participation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A24 score  Optional (1) Unfamiliar with the terms of manufacturing innovation and poor understanding of manufacturing innovation 0 (2) Recognize the importance of the company's manufacturing innovation, but actual participation is low 5 (3) sympathize and actively participate in the company's vision and strategy of manufacturing innovation 10

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Manufacturing Improvement and Innovation Awareness and Participation Level of Manufacturing Workers-Diagnostic Indicators-A25 score  Optional (1) Unfamiliar with the terms of manufacturing innovation and poor understanding of manufacturing innovation 0 (2) Recognize the importance of the company's manufacturing innovation, but actual participation is low 5 (3) sympathize and actively participate in the company's vision and strategy of manufacturing innovation 10

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Manufacturing Workers' Improvement and Innovation Level of IT Project Participation-Diagnostic Indicators-A26 score  Optional (1) Insufficient cooperation of manufacturing workers in IT projects 0 (2) The requirements of manufacturing workers are reflected in the promotion of IT projects, but they are not systematic. 4 (3) User participation system is established throughout the IT project, but manufacturing workers are not leading the requirements. 7 (4) User participation system is established throughout IT projects, and manufacturing workers are taking the lead in IT projects. 10

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Manufacturing Workers' Improvement and Innovation Level of IT Project Participation-Diagnostic Indicator-A26 score  Optional (1) Insufficient cooperation of manufacturing workers in IT projects 0 (2) The requirements of manufacturing workers are reflected in the promotion of IT projects, but they are not systematic. 4 (3) User participation system is established throughout the IT project, but manufacturing workers are not leading the requirements. 7 (4) User participation system is established throughout IT projects, and manufacturing workers are taking the lead in IT projects. 10

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Percentage of Manufacturing Workers' Participation in Self-directed or Empowered Work Teams-Diagnostic Indicators-A27 score Optional (1) 0% 0 (2) 1-25% 6 (3) 26-50% 8 (4) 51-75% 8 (5) 76-99% 10 (6) 100% 10

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Manufacturing Workers' Participation in Goal Setting-Diagnostic Indicators-A28 score  Optional (1) relatively low 0 (2) low 2 (3) Normal 4 (4) high convenience 7 (5) very high 10

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Level of Performance Measurement System of Manufacturing Workers-Diagnostic Indicator-A29 score  Optional (1) none 0 (2) There is an enterprise-wide evaluation system, but no separate evaluation system for manufacturing jobs 2 (3) Capabilities and achievements are defined for manufacturing group but self-evaluation system is insufficient. 4 (4) Self-assessment systems exist that are consistent with defined capabilities and achievements and are systematically implemented. 7 (5) A self-compensation system is also established and organically linked with the evaluation system. 10

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Status of Qualified Manpower in Manufacturing-Domestic Advanced Certification-Diagnostic Indicator-A30- (1) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Status of Manufacturing-related Qualified Manpower-Domestic and Lower Qualification Certificate-Diagnostic Indicator-A30- (2) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Status of Qualified Manpower Related to Manufacturing-International Certified Certificate-Diagnostic Indicator-A30- (3) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Innovation Activity Specialist Status-6 Sigma Champions-Diagnostic Indicators-A31- (1) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies. -

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Status of Innovation Experts-Master Black Belt-Diagnostic Indicators-A31- (2) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies. -

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Innovation Activity Experts-Black Belt-Diagnostic Indicators-A31- (3) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies. -

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Status of Innovative Experts-Green Belt-Diagnosis Indicators-A31- (4) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies. -

Mindset of Manufacturing Workers-Status of Experts in Innovation Activity-Enterprise Productivity (TPM) Experts-Diagnostic Indicators-A31- (5) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies. -

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Innovation Activity Specialist Status-Toyota Production System Expert-Diagnostic Indicator-A31- (6) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Mindset of Manufacturing Workforce-Status of Innovative Experts-External Advisors / Consultants-Diagnostic Indicators-A31- (7) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies. -

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Status of Experts in Innovation Activity-Other Qualifications for Manufacturing Innovation-Diagnostic Indicators-A31- (8) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Qualification Support Level for Manufacturing Workers-Diagnostic Indicator-A32 score  Optional (1) No present, no future plans 0 (2) Not present, but will be supported in the future 2 (3) Currently supports 30% of acquisition cost 4 (4) Currently support about 50% of acquisition cost 6 (5) Currently support about 80% of acquisition cost 8 (6) Currently supports 100% of acquisition costs. 10

Workforce Mindset-Multifunctional Workforce Ratio-Diagnostic Indicators-A33 score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies. -

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Manufacturing Expertise Management System-Diagnostic Indicators-A34 score  Optional (1) No 0 (2) Record and keep in a separate document 5 (3) Management using computer program 10 (4) Other Judge by response

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Manufacturing Manual Manual Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A35 score  Optional (1) No work manual 0 (2) About business content is managed by document 2 (3) Standardized work manuals are prepared but not shared systematically 4 (4) Anyone can easily access through the system 7 (5) It is maintained with the latest work manual and can be used anywhere in and outside the company. 10

 Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Establishment and Implementation Level of Manufacturing Manpower Development System-Diagnostic Indicator-A36 score  Optional (1) No activity for fostering manufacturing personnel 0 (2) There is no systematic program for fostering manpower, and it is conducted arbitrarily according to the situation. 2 (3) Only a fostering system exists for the entire manufacturing job group (C-diagnostic indicators-no classification of fostering programs by Areer) 4 (4) C-Diagnostic Indicators in Manufacturing Job Group-Manufacturing Manpower Development Program is established according to the required capability by each Areer. 7 (5) (4) + Fostering program is linked to HR system and rewards 10

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Manufacturing Staff Annual Training Plan and Execution Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A37 score  Optional (1) No plan 0 (2) 50% of the time 4 (3) 80% of the time 6 (4) Almost 100% running 8 (5) (4) + Education history management 10

Workforce Mindset-Workforce Training Program Content-Diagnostic Indicators-A38 score  Multiple responses (1) No training program 0 (2) Overall understanding of production / manufacturing activities 2 (3) How to find / remove waste 2 (4) reliability / quality control 2 (5) risk management 2 (6) Production / Manufacturing Analysis Tool 2 (7) IT related 2 (8) other 2 * 2 points are added for each selection, and 10 points are taken for each point.

Workforce Mindset-Workforce Training Time-Diagnostic Indicators-A39 score (1) none 0 (2) 8 hours or less 2 (3) 8-20 hours 4 (4) 21-40 hours 6 (5) 41 to 80 hours 8 (6) 80 hours or more 10

Mind of Manufacturing Manpower-Contents and Time of IT Training for Manpower-O-Diagnostic Indicator-A / Internet Field-Diagnostic Indicator-A40- (1) score  Open * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Content and Time of IT Training for Manufacturing Workers-Information System User Sector-Diagnostic Indicator-A40- (2) score  Open * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing Manpower Mind-Content and Time of IT Training for Manufacturing Manpower-Information Technology Field-Diagnostic Indicators-A40- (3) score  Open * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing Workers Mind-Manufacturing Workers IT Training Contents and Time-Others-Diagnostic Indicators-A40- (4) score  Open * Do not reflect on the score -

Tables 57 to 152 below are subdiagnostic groups and diagnostic indicators associated with manufacturing IT.

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Informatization Promotion Department-Diagnosis Indicators-A41 score Optional (1) none 0 (2) exists in the form of humility 5 (3) There is an organization in charge of informatization only 10

Manufacturing IT Organizations and Capabilities-Informatization Executives-Diagnostic Indicators-A42 score  Optional (1) No Information Officer (CIO), no person acting on behalf of 0 (2) There is no CIO, but the positions of general manager / manager in charge of IT take over the role of CIO 4 (3) Another executive is also a CIO 7 (4) There is a separate full-time CIO 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Competency-Manpower of Informatization Promotion and Manpower in Manufacturing Sector-Total Manpower in Informatization (2010) -Diagnostic Indicators-A43- (1) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) - * The shortage of 2011 will not be reflected in the score.

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Manpower for Information Informatization and Manpower in Manufacturing Sector-Manpower for Informatization in Manufacturing Sector (2010) -Diagnostic Indicators-A43- (2) score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) - * The shortage of 2011 will not be reflected in the score.

Manufacturing IT Organization and Competency-Share of Manufacturing Sector (%) (2010) -Diagnostic Indicators-A44 score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) - * The 2009 rate is not reflected in the score

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Informatization Strategic Planning and Manufacturing Informatization Strategic Plan Included-Diagnostic Indicators-A45 score  Optional (1) No information strategy plan 0 (2) Informatization Strategic Plan exists but does not include manufacturing sector 2 (3) Includes manufacturing sector and renews every year 4 (4) Includes manufacturing sector and renews every two years 7 (5) If manufacturing sector is included, update every 3 years or more 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Awareness Level of Informatization Strategic Plan of Members-CEO-Diagnostic Indicator-A46- (1) score  Optional (1) It is very lacking 0 (2) somewhat lack 2 (3) It is normal 4 (4) active 7 (5) Very active. 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Awareness Level of Informatization Strategic Plan of Members-Executive Team-Diagnostic Indicators-A46- (2) score  Optional (1) It is very lacking 0 (2) somewhat lack 2 (3) It is normal 4 (4) active 7 (5) Very active. 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Awareness Level of Informatization Strategic Plan of Members-Workers-Diagnostic Indicators Related to Manufacturing-A46- (3) score  Optional (1) It is very lacking 0 (2) somewhat lack 2 (3) It is normal 4 (4) active 7 (5) Very active. 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Informatization Investment in Manufacturing Sector-Diagnostic Indicators-A47 score  Optional (1) No investment in manufacturing informatization 0 (2) Informatization investment in the manufacturing sector is not full-blown, and only a simple O-diagnostic indicator-A environment is in place. 2 (3) mainly concentrated on hardware infrastructure such as server or network equipment 4 (4) Focusing on hardware infrastructure, recently focused on applications such as PLM and MES 7 (5) Focusing investment on enterprise system integration 10 * The highest score of your choice is the score of the indicator

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capabilities-Informatization Investment Budget (2010) -Diagnostic Indicators-A48 score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) - * 2009's 2011 budget is not included in the score

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Ratio of Informatization Investment in Manufacturing Sector to Total Informatization Investment Budget-Diagnostic Indicators-A48-1 score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score 0

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Information Investment Obstacles-Diagnostic Indicators-A49 score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Informatization Outsourcing Level of Manufacturing Sector-Introduction of Outsourcing-Diagnostic Indicator-A50- (1) score  Optional (1) Yes 0 (2) None but planned within one year (↓) 5 (3) There is no plan within one year (↓) 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Manufacturing Sector Informatization Outsourcing Level-Outsourcing Performance Ratio-Diagnostic Indicators-A50- (2) score  Open Planning / Planning Ratio * 2 Development rate * 4 Operating / Maintenance Ratio * 4 * Calculated as sum of scores corresponding to each surrender

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capability-Manufacturing Sector Informatization Outsourcing Level-Outsourcing Target-Diagnostic Indicator-A50- (3) score  Open * Do not reflect on the score -

IT organization and competence in manufacturing-Information system operating guidelines and procedures-Information system operating guidelines and procedures-Diagnostic indicators-A51- (1) score  Optional Check 2nd establishment 0 Check only once to establish 5 Check once for both establishment and implementation 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capabilities-Information Systems Operational Guidelines and Procedures-Information Systems Project Management and Procedures-Diagnostic Indicators-A51- (2) score Optional Check 2nd establishment 0 Check only once to establish 5 Check once for both establishment and implementation 10

IT organization and competence in manufacturing-Information system operating guidelines and procedures-Information system evaluation, supervision guidelines and procedures-Diagnostic indicators-A51- (3) score  Optional Check 2nd establishment 0 Check only once to establish 5 Check once for both establishment and implementation 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capabilities-Information System Operational Guidelines and Procedures-Information System Change Management Guidelines and Procedures-Diagnostic Indicators-A51- (4) score  Optional Check 2nd establishment 0 Check only once to establish 5 Check once for both establishment and implementation 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capabilities-Information Systems Operational Guidelines and Procedures-Guidelines and Procedures for Information Systems Equipment Management Standards-Diagnostic Indicators-A51- (5) score  Optional Check 2nd establishment 0 Check only once to establish 5 Check once for both establishment and implementation 10

IT organization and competence in manufacturing-Information system operating guidelines and procedures-Guidelines and procedures for information system emergency recovery plans-Diagnostic indicators-A51- (6) score  Optional Check 2nd establishment 0 Check only once to establish 5 Check once for both establishment and implementation 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capabilities-Information Systems Operational Guidelines and Procedures-Information Systems Security Management Guidelines and Procedures-Diagnostic Indicators-A51- (7) score  Optional Check 2nd establishment 0 Check only once to establish 5 Check once for both establishment and implementation 10

Manufacturing IT Organizations and Capabilities-Information Systems Operating Guidelines and Procedures-Guidelines and Procedures for Managing and Evaluating IT Organizations-Diagnostic Indicators-A51- (8) score  Optional Check 2nd establishment 0 Check only once to establish 5 Check once for both establishment and implementation 10

Manufacturing IT Organization and Capabilities-Information Systems Operating Guidelines and Procedures-Other-Diagnostic Indicators-A51- (9) score  Optional Check 2nd establishment 0 Check only once to establish 5 Check once for both establishment and implementation 10

Manufacturing IT Organizations and Capabilities-Information Infrastructure and Systems Assessment Levels-Diagnostic Indicators-A52 score Optional (1) none 0 (2) 1 year 10 (3) 2 years 7 (4) more than 3 years 4

Manufacturing IT Infra-Infrastructure Types-Diagnostic Indicators-A53 score  Multiple responses (1) PC environment 0 (2) Host / Termin-Diagnostic Indicator-Al Environment 4 (3) Client / Server Environment 7 (4) Web environment or Web Services environment 10 (5) Other () Judge by response * The highest score of your choice is the score of the indicator

Manufacturing IT Infra-Information Equipment Distribution Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A54 score  Optional (1) very short 0 (2) shortage 2 (3) normal 4 (4) enough 7 (5) very enough 10

Manufacturing IT Infra-Network Environment-Diagnostic Indicators-A55 score  Multiple responses (1) none 0 (2) intranet 2 (3) Extranet with other businesses 2 (4) Local area network (L-diagnostic indicator-AN) 3 (5) Wide Area Network (W-Diagnostic Indicator-AN) 3 (6) other Judge by response * Calculated as sum of scores for each item

Manufacturing IT Infra-Network Coverage-Diagnostic Indicators-A56 score  Optional (1) The current office does not have a network. 0 (2) Currently building networks only in offices 2 (3) Constructing a network not only in the office but also on-site 4 (4) Establish a single network environment not only in offices and on-site but also in overseas branches 6 (5) Establish a single network environment not only at home and abroad but also with major suppliers 10

IT Infra-Internet Access Methods-Diagnostic Indicators-A57 score  Multiple responses (1) xDSL (-diagnostic indicators-ADSL, VDSL, SDSL) 4 (2) dedicated line 10 (3) cable modem 7 (4) Optical LAN (optical communication network, apartment LAN, etc.) 7 (5) Wireless ultra high speed (WiBro, WLAN, HSDP-Diagnostic Indicator-A) 10 (6) modem 0 (7) ISDN (Comprehensive Information Communication Service) 0 (8) Other () Judge by response

IT Infra-Backup System Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A58 score  Optional (1) There is no separate backup system 0 (2) It does not have a dual backup system, but only a simple backup system using tape. 4 (3) Dual backup system and real time backup system 7 (4) It carries out dual backup system and real-time backup system, and establishes and operates backup center in remote place. 10

IT Infra-Information System Security Management Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A59 score  Optional (1) Security program is not installed 0 (2) Security program and antivirus are installed, but there is no central control system to check operation. 4 (3) Security programs and virus vaccines are installed, and the system is checked by the central control system at once. 7 (4) (3) + Report and notify the inspection results regularly and take immediate security measures when necessary. 10

IT Infra-Information Security Activity Level-Establishment of Information Security Policy-Diagnostic Indicator-A60- (1) score  Optional Check twice whether it is introduced / utilized or planned to be introduced within 2 years 0 Check the introduction / use 2 times and the introduction plan 2 years 5 Check once for introduction / utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Infra-Information Security Activity Level-Information Security Education and Training-Diagnostic Indicators-A60- (2) score  Optional Check twice whether it is introduced / utilized or planned to be introduced within 2 years 0 Check the introduction / use 2 times and the introduction plan 2 years 5 Check once for introduction / utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Infra-Information Security Activity Level-Facility Security-Diagnostic Indicators-A60- (3) score  Optional Check twice whether it is introduced / utilized or planned to be introduced within 2 years 0 Check the introduction / use 2 times and the introduction plan 2 years 5 Check once for introduction / utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Infra-Information Security Activity Level-Network Security-Diagnostic Indicators-A60- (4) score  Optional Check twice whether it is introduced / utilized or planned to be introduced within 2 years 0 Check the introduction / use 2 times and the introduction plan 2 years 5 Check once for introduction / utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Infra-Information Security Activity Level-Service Server Security-Diagnostic Indicators-A60- (5) score  Optional Check twice whether it is introduced / utilized or planned to be introduced within 2 years 0 Check the introduction / use 2 times and the introduction plan 2 years 5 Check once for introduction / utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Infra-Information Security Activity Level-Personal Computer Security-Diagnostic Indicators-A60- (6) score  Optional Check twice whether it is introduced / utilized or planned to be introduced within 2 years 0 Check the introduction / use 2 times and the introduction plan 2 years 5 Check once for introduction / utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Manufacturing Sector Information System Application Stage-Diagnostic Indicators-A61 score  Optional (1) Currently not used at all 0 (2) ① Personalization step: IT utilization by individual such as computer, word process 2 (3) ② Unit business informatization stage: IT utilization in the unit business of the organization such as inventory and production system 4 (4) ③Integration of organizational work informatization stage: system of unit work is inter-organizational connection and through ERP 7 Steps that are integrated and utilized throughout the organization's business (5) ④ Business Collaboration Steps between Companies: IT Utilization for Organization Collaboration Outside Organizations 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Introduction of Manufacturing System Information System (Self Development, Outsourcing Development, P-ackage, ASP, etc.)-Diagnostic Indicator-A62 score  Open * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Introduction and Use of MES-Diagnostic Indicators -A63- (1) score  Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-Whether SPC or SQC is being introduced and utilized-Diagnostic Indicators-A63-(2) score  Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-PLM / PPM Introduction and Utilization-Diagnostic Indicator-A63- (3) score  Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-Introduction and Use of QMS-Diagnostic Indicators -A63- (4) score  Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-Introduction and Utilization of LIMS-Diagnostic Indicator-A63- (5) score  Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-ERP Introduction and Utilization-Diagnostic Indicators-A63- (6) score  Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-Introduction and Use of SCM-Diagnostic Indicator-A63- (7) score  Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-CRM Introduction and Utilization-Diagnostic Indicators -A63- (8) score  Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-Introduction and Use of RFID-Diagnostic Indicator-A63- (9) score Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-Introduction and Utilization of BI-Diagnostic Indicator-A63- (10) score  Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-Introduction and Utilization of BRM-Diagnostic Indicator-A63- (11) score  Optional (1) no need - (2) No introduction plan but required 0 (3) Will be introduced within two years 5 (4) During introduction / utilization 10 * Don't count if you choose None

Manufacturing IT Application-Material Management System-Information Technology Introduction / Utilization-Diagnostic Indicator-A64- (1) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Material Management System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (1) score  Multiple responses (1) Goods Receipt Management 3 (2) Disbursement Management 3 (3) Inventory management 4 (4) Other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-Material Management System-Need to Build Additional Functions-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (1) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Material Management System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (1) score  Optional (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Manufacturing IT Application-Product Management System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (2) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Product Management System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (2) score  Multiple responses (1) Goods Receipt Management 2.5 (2) shipping management 2.5 (3) Shipment Management 2.5 (4) Inventory management 2.5 (5) other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-Product Management System-Need to Build Additional Functions-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (2) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Product Management System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (2) score  Optional (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Manufacturing IT Application-Resource Management System-Information Technology Introduction / Utilization-Diagnostic Indicator-A64- (3) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Resource Management System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (3) score  Multiple responses (1) Facility operation 4 (2) Airborne Management 3 (3) Tool management 3 (4) Other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-Resource Management System-Need to Build Additional Functions-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (3) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Resource Management System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (3) score  Optional (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Manufacturing IT Application-Facility Management System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (4) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Facility Management System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (4) score  Multiple responses (!) Equipment Manager 2 (2) failure maintenance 2 (3) preventive maintenance 2 (4) Predictive Maintenance 2 (5) Repair Materials 2 (6) other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-Facility Management System-Need to Build Additional Functions-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (4) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Facility Management System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (4) score  Optional (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Manufacturing IT Application-Process Management System-Information Technology Introduction / Utilization-Diagnostic Indicator-A64- (5) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Process Management System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (5) score  Multiple responses (1) Production progress 2.5 (2) productivity 2.5 (3) work coordination 2.5 (4) Lot tracking 2.5 (5) other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-Process Management System-Need to Build Additional Functions-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (5) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Process Management System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (5) score  Optional (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Manufacturing IT Application-Production Technology System-Information Technology Introduction / Utilization-Diagnostic Indicator-A64- (6) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Production Technology System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (6) score  Multiple responses (1) product design 2.5 (2) process design 2.5 (3) engineering method design 2.5 (4) Field technology (C-diagnostic indicator-AM) 2.5 (5) other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-Production Technology System-Need to Build Additional Functions-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (6) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Production Technology System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (6) score  Optional (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Manufacturing IT Application-Production Planning System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (7) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Production Planning System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (7) score  Multiple responses (!) Production Schedule 2.5 (2) simulation 2.5 (3) load plan 2.5 (4) Work plan 2.5 (5) other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-Production Planning System-Need to Build Additional Functions-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (7) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Production Planning System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (7) score  Optional (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Manufacturing IT Application-Quality Management System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (8) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Quality Management System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (8) score  Multiple responses (1) design quality 2 (2) Delivery quality 2 (3) process quality 2 (4) statistical process control 2 (5) shipping quality 2 (6) Field Cl-Diagnostic Indicators-Aim 2 (7) other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-Quality Management System-Need to Build Additional Functions-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (8) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application- score  Optional Quality Management System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A64- (8) (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Manufacturing IT Application-Field Operation System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (9) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Field Operation System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (9) score  Multiple responses (1) Status monitoring 4 (2) Alarm management 3 (3) HM 3 (4) Other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-On-site operating system-Need to build additional functions-Diagnostic indicators-A64- (9) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Field Operation System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (9) score  Optional (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Manufacturing IT Application-Procurement Management System-Information Technology Introduction / Utilization-Diagnostic Indicator-A64- (10) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Procurement Management System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (10) score  Multiple responses (1) Procurement Definition 2 (2) Procurement Forecast 2 (3) schedule management 2 (4) Supply and demand plan 2 (5) production distribution 2 (6) other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-Procurement Management System-Need to Build Additional Functions-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (10) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Procurement Management System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (10) score  Optional (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Manufacturing IT Application-Data Management System-Information Technology Introduction / Utilization-Diagnostic Indicator-A64- (11) score  Optional (1) not required (↓) - (2) Required but not introduced (↓) 0 (3) Introduction / Utilization 10

Manufacturing IT Application-Data Management System-Function Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (11) score  Multiple responses (1) Production data collection 2 (2) Production data storage 2 (3) Production data inquiry 2 (4) resource data collection 2 (5) Resource data storage 2 (6) Resource data inquiry 2 (7) other * Calculated as sum of scores for each item * Additional points will be awarded based on other responses. However, if it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Manufacturing IT Application-Data management system-Need to build additional functions-Diagnostic indicators-A64- (11) score  Optional * Do not reflect on the score -

Manufacturing IT Application-Data Management System-Information Technology Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A64- (11) score  Optional (1) absolutely supported 10 (2) - 7 (3) generally supported 4 (4) - 2 (5) Almost not supported 0

Tables 153 to 288 below are subdiagnostic groups and diagnostic indicators associated with the manufacturing process.

Production Planning-BOM / Recipe Standardization Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A65 score  Optional (1) BOM / Recipe information is not managed at all 0 (2) Non-standardized BOM / Recipe information is managed for each product 2 (3) Standardized BOM / Recipe information for the manufactured product is managed in the form of document. 4 (4) Standardized BOM / Recipe information about the product can be inquired on DB 7 (5) Standardized BOM / Recipe information can be added, updated and viewed online for new products. 10

Production Plan-Standard Production Plan (MPS) Establishment Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A66 score  Optional (1) Establish baseline production plans at the department (or person in charge) level at irregular intervals. 0 (2) Regularly establish baseline production plans at the department (or staff) level. 2 (3) Established through a meeting to establish a baseline production plan by contacting the person in charge of the department concerned irregularly 4 (4) Regular meetings are held, with only those from some departments involved in production planning (PMS), inventory, design, sales, and purchasing. 7 (5) Regular meetings and meetings of all departments involved 10

Production Planning-Automated Level of Establishment of Standard Production Plan (MPS) -Diagnostic Indicator-A67 score  Optional (1) Performing manually (including Excel) from collection to creation of input data 0 (2) The production plan of the main system is used, but the work site is additionally reflected in the constraints of the production site and the verification and correction of the production plan results are carried out. 2 (3) The production system of the main system is used, but the function of Wh-diagnostic indicator-At-IfSimul-diagnostic indicator-Ation is weak, and the simulation time is also relatively high. 4 (4) Planning can be made within hours using the production system of the backbone system. Wh-Diagnostic Indicator-At-If Simul-Diagnostic Indicator-Ation Deterministic 7 (5) The production plan of the main system has built-in optimization function, and it is possible to establish and adjust the production plan in real time. 10

Production Planning-Automatic reflection level of sales forecasting and demand planning-Diagnostic indicators-A68 score  Optional (1) Does not reflect sales forecast and demand plan 0 (2) Reflect manual sales forecasts and demand plans 2 (3) The sales forecast and demand plan are reflected through the system, but the utilization of the sales forecast and demand forecast information is insufficient. 4 (4) The system establishes and manages production plans by reflecting demand plans, material requirements plans, and production capacity plans on a monthly basis. 7 (5) We maintain the optimal production plan by reflecting the fluctuations in the demand plan, material requirements plan, and production capacity plan in minimum units and sharing them with external partners. 10

Production Plan-Time Fence Operation Method-Diagnostic Indicator-A69 score  Optional (1) The baseline production plan is not in use or the current system does not support time fence. 0 (2) There are systems that support Time Fence, but there are no guidelines on management 2 (3) There are guidelines for setting up and operating time fences 4 (4) There are guidelines, but the operation policy is changing from time to time according to the interests of the relevant departments. 7 (5) Time Fence's operating guidelines are reflected in the system, and the operating policy is well followed. 10

Production Planning-Material Requirements Planning System-Diagnostic Indicator-A70 score  Optional (1) Enforced as needed from time to time 0 (2) The execution plan of the S & OP is planned according to the period in which it is established, and is not changed in principle until the period is reached. 2 (3) Establish regenerative diagnostics on a regular basis (e.g. 3 days, weeks, biweekly) based on internal principles. And the plan does not change before the replan 4 (4) Periodically replan, and if a change is needed before the replanning point, net change (Net Ch-diagnosis indicator-Ange) is performed. 7 (5) The plan is being changed by using the real-time replanning function. 10

Production Planning-Material Requirements Planning Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A71 score  Optional (1) Material requirements planning is not calculated 0 (2) Calculation of material requirements plan is done by hand 2 (3) There is a system for calculating the material requirements plan, but it is not linked to the production plan and inventory status. 4 (4) The system for calculating the material requirements plan is being used in connection with the production plan and the inventory status system, but it is only applied to specific items. 7 (5) The system for calculating the material requirements plan is closely linked to the production plan and inventory status system, and is used throughout the company. 10

Production Planning-Automation Level of Production Availability Management-Diagnostic Indicators-A72 score  Optional (1) Does not plan / manage production availability 0 (2) Manual production capacity planning / management 2 (3) There is a system to plan / manage production capacity, but its use is insufficient due to lack of linkage with resource planning and process planning. 4 (4) Production capacity management system is closely linked with resource planning and process planning, and relevant information is reflected in production planning. 7 (5) Production capacity management system is closely linked with resource plan and process plan information, and related information is used for cost management as well as production plan. 10

Production Plan-Significance, change procedures, and compliance by the baseline production plan change-Raw material quality-Diagnostic indicators -A73- (1) score  Optional Check the establishment of procedure 2 0 Check only once with the procedure 5 Check once for both the establishment of procedures and the compliance of procedures 10 * If importance is checked in 2, it will not be reflected in the score

Production plan-Significance, change procedure establishment and compliance by change of reference production plan-Design change-Diagnostic indicator-A73- (2) score  Optional Check the establishment of procedure 2 0 Check only once with the procedure 5 Check once for both the establishment of procedures and the compliance of procedures 10 * If importance is checked in 2, it will not be reflected in the score

Production Plan-Significance, change procedure establishment and compliance by change factor of standard production plan-Production capacity shortage (machine failure, etc.)-Diagnostic Indicators-A73- (3) score  Optional Check the establishment of procedure 2 0 Check only once with the procedure 5 Check once for both the establishment of procedures and the compliance of procedures 10 * If importance is checked in 2, it will not be reflected in the score

Significance, change procedure establishment and compliance by each change factor of standard production plan-Change of production strategy-Diagnosis indicators-A73 score  Optional Check the establishment of procedure 2 0 Check only once with the procedure 5 Check once for both the establishment of procedures and the compliance of procedures 10 * If importance is checked in 2, it will not be reflected in the score

Production Plan-Importance of each change factor of the standard production plan, establishment and compliance with the change procedure-Quality (Poor)-Diagnostic Indicators-A73- (5) score  Optional Check the establishment of procedure 2 0 Check only once with the procedure 5 Check once for both the establishment of procedures and the compliance of procedures 10 * If importance is checked in 2, it will not be reflected in the score

Production Plan-Significance, change procedure establishment and compliance by change of reference production plan-Urgent Order-Diagnostic Indicator-A73- (6) score  Optional Check the establishment of procedure 2 0 Check only once with the procedure 5 Check once for both the establishment of procedures and the compliance of procedures 10 * If importance is checked in 2, it will not be reflected in the score

Production plan-Significance, change procedure establishment and compliance by change of reference production plan-Order change (quantity, delivery date, etc.)-Diagnosis indicator-A73- (7) score  Optional Check the establishment of procedure 2 0 Check only once with the procedure 5 Check once for both the establishment of procedures and the compliance of procedures 10 * If importance is checked in 2, it will not be reflected in the score

Production Plan-Significance, change procedure establishment and compliance by each change factor of the standard production plan-Other-Diagnosis indicators -A73- (8) score  Optional Check the establishment of procedure 2 0 Check only once with the procedure 5 Check once for both the establishment of procedures and the compliance of procedures 10 * If importance is checked in 2, it will not be reflected in the score

Production Planning-What-if Simulation Application Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A74 score  Optional (1) Wh-Diagnostic Indicator-At-IfSimul-Diagnostic Indicator-Ation Not Used 0 (2) Change of Ordering Rule 2 (3) Reflection of production strategy 2 (4) designation of replacement items 2 (5) Alternative Routing 2 (6) production capacity adjustment 2 (7) Supply plan adjustment 2 (8) Change in demand (delivery date and demand) 2 (9) Change workload GUI (dr-diagnostic indicator-Ag & drop) 2 (10) Storage (storage) of simulation results 2 (11) Other () Judge by response * 2 points are added for each selection, and 10 points are taken for each point.

Production Planning-Automation Level-Product Production Performance-Diagnostic Indicators-A75 score  Optional (1) Excel processing by manual labor 0 (2) DB storage by manual 2 (3) It is simply stored in DB by online connection with automation system 4 (4) V-Diagnostic Indicator-Ari-Diagnostic Indicator-Ance of Performance and Plan is continuously monitored on the system and information is shared by linking with other systems. 7 (5) Performance information is reflected into the system at each facility, and the model is continuously managed in the latest and optimal state. 10

Production Planning-Analysis of Performance Differences compared to Production Planning and Grassland Method-Diagnostic Indicators-A76 score  Optional (1) Used to evaluate the results of production activities 4 (2) Analyze the cause for the difference exceeding the tolerance 6 (3) analyze the accuracy of the assumptions used in the production planning process; 6 (4) Analyze the cause of the error and compare it with the assumptions used in the planning 8 (5) The contents of the causes and measures of errors are managed by knowledge, and efforts are made to reduce the errors. 10 * The highest score of your choice is the score of the indicator

Production Planning-Level of Linkage with Related Departments for Production Planning-Diagnostic Indicators-A77 score  Optional (1) The data is not shared at all 0 (2) Received as a file and used for production planning 2 (3) Connected on-line, but on-line interface is not established with some systems 4 (4) All related systems are connected on-line, but verification is required due to slow speed or low data accuracy. 7 (5) All related systems are connected on-line, and the necessary d-diagnostic indicator-At-diagnostic indicator-A can be obtained and utilized in real time. 10

Production Planning-How to Plan Production Between Multiple Plants / Lines-Diagnostic Indicators-A78 score  Optional (1) Independent production planning and operation 0 (2) Production plan is done independently, but using other factories / lines by means of shortcut 2 (3) Production planning and operation are carried out according to the quantity distributed at the stage of the life meeting. 4 (4) Maximize production capacity through integrated production planning 7 (5) It utilizes production capacity to the maximum through an integrated production plan, and tries to equalize loads. 10

Production Planning-Production Plan Sharing Level with Supply Chain Partners-Diagnostic Indicators-A79 score  Optional (1) Not shared 0 (2) Information sharing with supply chain partners through the system, but not reflected in plans changes 2 (3) Information sharing with supply chain partners through the system and reflected when the plan changes 4 (4) Information sharing is carried out not only in Korea but also through global supply chain partners, but it is not reflected when the plan changes. 7 (5) Information sharing is carried out not only in Korea but also through global supply chain partners and systems. 10

Procurement of Material-Procurement and Outsourcing Policy-Establishment Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A80 score  Optional (1) none 0 (2) Policy is established but not followed 5 (3) Policies are in place and are followed 10

Material Procurement-Standardization of Code and Control Items for Procurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A81 score  Optional (1) The code of the procurement is not controlled at all 0 (2) Only their procurement item codes are managed, and supplier item codes are not managed together. 4 (3) The company's procurement code and the supplier's item code are managed together. 7 (4) (3) + managed by the system 10 (5) （4） + Electronic C-Diagnostic Indicator-At-Diagnostic Indicator-Alog is available to support internet purchase 10

Material Procurement-How to Plan a Material Procurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A82 score  Optional (1) Produce and fill whenever and when necessary without planning 0 (2) Supply-demand plan is established in long-term production plan, and inventory management is performed accordingly. 2 (3) Inventory management is carried out in accordance with short-term operation plan regardless of long-term production plan 4 (4) The raw material supply and demand plan is made based on the long-term production plan, but the actual inventory management is operated in accordance with the short-term operation plan. 7 (5) Inventory management is performed by considering supply and demand balancing according to short-term operation plan and long-term production plan. 10

Material Procurement-Material Procurement Ordering Cycle Operation Method-Diagnostic Indicator-A83 score  Optional (1) Collected and processed once a month or twice a month (B-diagnostic indicator-Atch) 3 (2) Ordering once a week on specific days 5 (3) It is flexibly processed according to the stock grade and order characteristics of each item. 10

Material Procurement-Material Requirements Planning (MRP) Utilization Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A84 score  Optional (1) No material requirements planning (MRP) system 0 (2) Material Requirements Planning (MRP) system exists but is not utilized 2 (3) The purchase amount is determined regularly (eg, once or twice a month) using the material requirements planning (MRP) system. 4 (4) Determine purchase point and purchase amount according to material requirement plan by using material requirement plan (MRP) system. 7 (5) (4) + Minimize adjustment of purchase volume and point of purchase by automatically considering the production capacity of suppliers 10

Material procurement-How to determine the amount of raw and subsidiary material orders other than MRP and when to place an order-Diagnostic Indicators-A85 score  Multiple responses * Do not reflect on the score -

Procurement-Level of Flexible Adjustment of Procurement Planning-Diagnostic Indicators-A86 score (1) Procurement parts are difficult to procure due to frequent changes in procurement plans, causing delays in delivery and defects. 0 (2) The procurement plan has been changed from time to time to secure sufficient inventory from the supplier or the company. 4 (3) The procurement plan is relatively stable, and the change of the procurement plan is made by agreement with the relevant department, but agreement with the supplier is insufficient. 7 (4) Since procurement plans are established through consensus with internal consensus and suppliers, they are jointly seeking flexible measures even if they are stable and need to be adjusted. 10

Procurement-Procurement Unit Price Estimation Method-Diagnostic Indicator-A87 score  Optional (1) Estimate cost of procurement without form, depending on the experience of the person in charge or based on data submitted by the supplier 0 (2) The procurement unit price is calculated based on the form, but is inclined to the form. 2 (3) The cost of procurement is easily calculated according to the form (eg Excel). 4 (4) Forms and necessary data can be automatically obtained, calculated and output from the system 7 (5) Minimize unnecessary verification work because the data necessary for calculation is regularly managed. In addition, the supplier's performance evaluation results are linked together to be used for procurement price calculation. 10

Procurement-Online Procurement Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A88 score  Optional (1) Planned or not yet made available through the Internet 0 (2) It is registered on specialized sites on the Internet (Micro-Market Place, etc.) and procures necessary goods. 4 (3) Equipped with its own Internet purchasing site, but linkage with the main system is performed manually. 6 (4) Equipped with its own Internet purchasing site, the procurement system is linked to the main system, and the entire procurement / procurement process is transparent. 8 (5) Establish a market place by utilizing its purchasing power, and form a port-diagnostic indicator-Al or community in which peers including competitors participate. 10

Procurement-Online Procurement Scale-Diagnostic Indicators-A89 score  Optional (1) 0% 0 (2) 1-20% 2 (3) 20-40% 4 (4) 40-60% 6 (5) 60-80% 8 (6) 80-95% 10 (7) 95% or more 10

Procurement-Purchasing Order Progress Real-time Monitoring Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A90 score  Optional (1) It is impossible to check real-time progress until the receipt of goods after the purchase order is issued. Call or F-Diagnostic Indicator-AX as needed 0 (2) The supplier periodically informs the progress of the purchase order by fax or e-mail. 2 (3) Order progress can be tracked through the supplier's Internet site 4 (4) Since I / F is configured between supplier's Internet Site and its system, progress of purchase order can be checked in real time. 7 (5) The progress of purchase orders can be checked in real time, and E-diagnostic indicators-Arly warnings can be obtained when expected delivery delays are expected. 10

Procurement-How to Deal with Arrivals and Delays in Procurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A91 score  Optional (1) Delays in delivery and quality problems often lead to disruptions in production, causing delays in delivery or defective products. 0 (2) Production delays may occur due to delays in delivery or quality problems, but they are being addressed through the use of safety inventory, reminders, or the use of alternative customers. 4 (3) There is little time delay or quality problem, but many customers have stock for the purpose of supplying parts to the company smoothly. 7 (4) There is no delay in delivery or quality problem, and we minimize the inventory through our plan sharing and cooperation program with our company and strive for quality improvement. 10

Material Procurement-Supplier History and Evaluation Results Management Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A92 score  Optional (1) does not maintain any information about suppliers 0 (2) Manually manage information about suppliers 2 (3) Only basic status information of suppliers is managed through the system 4 (4) Supplier information is managed through the system, but only historical status information and history information can be inquired. 7 (5) Supplier information is managed throughout the company and reflected in future purchases through comprehensive analysis and evaluation of individual suppliers. 10

Material Procurement-Level of Linkage with Related Department Systems for Procurement Activities-Diagnostic Indicators-A93 score  Optional (1) The data is not shared at all 0 (2) Received as a file and used for procurement activities 2 (3) Connected on-line, but on-line interface is not established with some systems 4 (4) All related systems are connected on-line, but verification is required because of slow speed or low data accuracy. 7 (5) All related systems are connected on-line, and the necessary d-diagnostic indicator-At-diagnostic indicator-A can be obtained and utilized in real time. 10

Procurement-Information Electronically Provided to Suppliers-Diagnostic Indicators-A94 score  Multiple responses (1) Production plan 2 (2) sales plan 2 (3) Inventory information 2 (4) Quality Information 2 (5) Design change information 2 (6) Purchase amount and point of purchase example information 2 (7) drawing information 2 (8) other Judge by response * Sum is calculated as the sum of the points corresponding to each surrender.If it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Procurement-Information electronically provided by the supplier-Diagnostic Indicators-A95 score  Multiple responses (1) Production plan or supply plan 2.5 (2) Inventory information 2.5 (3) Quality Information 2.5 (4) Production capacity information 2.5 (5) other Judge by response * Sum is calculated as the sum of the points corresponding to each surrender.If it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Production Process-Process Routing Standardization Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A96 score  Optional (1) Routing information is not managed at all 0 (2) Routing information of unstandardized form is managed by product 2 (3) Standardized routing information for the products produced is managed in the form of documents. 4 (4) Standardized routing information for the product can be inquired on DB 7 (5) Standardized routing information can be added, updated and viewed online for new production products. 10

Production Process-Factors to Consider in Process / Line Operation Planning-Diagnostic Indicators-A97 score  Multiple responses (1) distribution of appropriate processes / lines for the products produced; One (2) Proper determination of Lot / B-diagnostic indicator-Atch size One (3) Optimum Recipe One (4) Intermediate treatment plant route and start time at each plant One (5) Delivery date of the product waiting for input One (6) Waiting time at next process after inputting current process One (7) Current process productivity One (8) Efficiency of facility production in processing sequence for each product One (9) Yield at each intermediate treatment facility of each product One (10) Calculation of transfer time between each facility One (11) M-Diagnostic Indicator-Ateri-Diagnostic Indicator-Al b-Diagnostic Indicator-Al-Diagnostic Indicator-Ance between Raw Materials and Products One (12) Setup time according to product change One (13) other Judge by response * Sum is calculated as the sum of the points corresponding to each surrender.If it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Production Process-Process / Line Operational Planning Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A98 score  Optional (1) The automated system is not built 0 (2) Admin writes by hand and inputs into system and manages only 2 (3) If written by handwriting and entering into the system, the contents are delivered to the automation system. 4 (4) Automatic operation plan establishment system is established, and according to this, the contents are automatically delivered to the automation system with the confirmation of the manager, and production is made according to the contents. 7 (5) An automated system that can establish optimized operation plans and unscheduled order processing is established, and the automation system is operated accordingly to produce. 10

Production Process-Computer-Diagnostic Indicators-Aided Process / Line Operation Planning Tasks-Diagnostic Indicators-A99 score  Multiple responses (1) Extraction of the shape to be machined 2 (2) Determine how to process 2 (3) Setup decision 2 (4) tool determination 2 (5) Determination of Cutting Conditions 2 (6) document creation and management 2 (7) Determine work order 2 (8) hardware determination 2 (9) other Judge by response * Sum is calculated as the sum of the points corresponding to each surrender.If it exceeds 10 points, it is treated as 10 points.

Production Process-Introduce and utilize Lot in process operation-Diagnostic Indicators-A100 score  Optional (1) Lot information is not managed at all 0 (2) Lot information of unstandardized form is managed 2 (3) The same items are prepared and managed on paper based on the standardized form for all products. 4 (4) Standardized lot information is managed and can be viewed on DB 7 (5) Information is collected and reported in lot units in all processes, and tr-diagnostic indicator-acking is possible in connection with the order. 10

Production Process-Layout Layout Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A101 score  Optional (1) Not at all 0 (2) No 2 (3) It is normal 4 (4) Yes 7 (5) very much 10

Production Process-Line B-Diagnostic Indicator-Al-Diagnostic Indicator-Ancing Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A102 score  Optional (1) No line B-diagnostic indicator-Al-diagnostic indicator-Ancing for process load allocation 0 (2) It depends on the sense of the manager 2 (3) The LineB-diagnostic indicator-Al-diagnostic indicator-Ancing model is constructed and used only for some processes. 4 (4) A formula model for each line is established and is simulated using it. 7 (5) Calculate optimized Line B-diagnostic indicator-Al-diagnostic indicator-Ancing using Line B-diagnostic indicator-Al-diagnostic indicator-Ancing simulation. 10

Production Process-Production Schedule Planning Method-Diagnostic Indicators-A103 score  Optional (1) The schedule is not formulated and the order is properly set in the manufacturing sector while looking at the order. 0 (2) Schedule planning but rarely used 2 (3) A monthly production schedule is established, but often the production schedule is not kept. 4 (4) Large schedules and small schedules are being established in co-operation, and almost you are producing, but not responding to order changes or changes. 7 (5) Establish a production plan three months ago, draw up a final plan for this month, and make fine adjustments every day due to fluctuations in orders. 10

Production Process-Production Schedule Planning Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A104 score  Optional (1) No schedule planning 0 (2) Prepare a plan by hand based on the operator's experience 2 (3) Write by hand based on the operator's experience using simulation tools 4 (4) Created by an automatic scheduling program 7 (5) Determine the schedule plan by performing optimization work based on the established schedule plan 10

Production Process-Work Process Standard Time Setting Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A105 score  Optional (1) There is no concept of standard time 0 (2) Comprehensive standard time based on work experience, not standard time based on scientific techniques 4 (3) Calculate and apply standard time calculated by scientific technique 6 (4) (3) Using standard time as a tool for improvement activities (work efficiency, delivery management, etc.) 8 (5) (4) + Standard time is used for business management (cost management, salary calculation, etc.) 10

Production Process-Work Guide Standardization Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A106 score  Optional (1) not managed at all 0 (2) Work instructions not drawn up under standardized items are managed on paper. 2 (3) The work manual for each process is prepared based on the standardized form and managed on paper. 4 (4) Standardized work guide is queried on DB 7 (5) Standardized work guide is managed by the information system, changes can be easily updated and updated, and on-line inquiry is possible. 10

Production Process-Work Guide Compliance Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A107 score  Optional (1) No standardized work manual 0 (2) Standardized workbooks are available but hardly followed 2 (3) Standardized workbooks exist but some are not followed 4 (4) Nearly standardized work instructions are followed 7 (5) The company is complying with the standardized work guidebook, and the workers are actively improving the work standards such as waste work and improving imbalance. 10

Production Process-Automated Work Schedule and Dosing Control Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A108 score  Optional (1) Work schedule and administration personnel are not managed 0 (2) Manual work schedule and administration of administration personnel 2 (3) There is a system to manage work schedule and administration personnel, but it is not used because information registration is not systematically done. 4 (4) Work schedule and manpower management system are systematically established, but only used in some sites 7 (5) Work schedule and manpower management system are used throughout the company. 10

Production process-Application level of the latest manufacturing techniques-Conversion speed improvement technology-Diagnostic indicator-A109- (1) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Production Process-Application Level of Modern Manufacturing Techniques-Focused Factory Production Systems-Diagnostic Indicators-A109- (2) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Production process-Application level of the latest manufacturing techniques-JIT / continuous-flow production-Diagnostic indicators-A109- (3) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Production process-Application level of the latest manufacturing techniques-Cell manufacturing method-Diagnostic indicator-A109- (4) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Production Process-Application Level of Latest Manufacturing Techniques-Lot-size Reduction Technology-Diagnostic Indicators-A109- (5) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Production Process-Application Level of Modern Manufacturing Techniques-Predictive and Preventive Maintenance-Diagnostic Indicators-A109- (6) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Production process-Application level of the latest manufacturing techniques-Pull system / Kanban-Diagnostic indicator-A109- (7) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Production Process-Level of Application of the Latest Manufacturing Techniques-Cooperation of Design and Production Staff in New Product Design-Diagnostic Indicator-A109- (8) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Production Process-Level of Application of the Latest Manufacturing Techniques-Operator Based Maintenance-Diagnostic Indicators-A109- (9) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Production Process-Automation Level vs. Overall Process-Diagnostic Indicators-A110 score  Optional (1) fully automatic 10 (2) partial automatic 7 (3) operator input system directly 4 (4) handwriting input 0

Production Process-Process Yield Prediction Model Construction Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A111 score  Optional (1) No yield prediction model 0 (2) There is a yield prediction model, but do not analyze / evaluate the prediction result 2 (3) Periodically manually input the performance value into the yield prediction model to compare the difference between the performance value and the model calculation. 4 (4) The performance data collected online is automatically compared with the prediction value and performance value by the process yield prediction model. 7 (5) Update yield prediction models based on model evaluation and analysis. 10

Production Process-Emergency Order Processing Method-Diagnostic Indicator-A112 score  Optional (1) not considered at all 0 (2) Stop the sub-operation plan entirely and start the work without considering the adequacy of the starting point of the urgent order, and perform the remaining work as it is by delaying the start time in the established operation plan. 2 (3) Discontinue the sub-operation plan and perform the work first, but the remaining work will be reworked to establish the operation plan in consideration of the production priority criteria. 4 (4) At the present time, a new equipment operation plan is prepared so that new work can be added and produced in consideration of production priority criteria, and production is performed accordingly. 7 (5) Produce and produce a new operation plan to minimize the change of the entire operation schedule in all processes / lines. 10

Production Process-Countermeasures for Equipment Failure-Diagnostic Indicator-A113 score  Multiple responses (1) If an equipment fails, the process / line must be shut down entirely. 0 (2) Wait until the next equipment is restored to normal from the previous equipment 5 (3) It has a p-diagnostic indicator-Ath that can query and bypass air-operated equipment that can be used instead of the following equipment. 8 (4) using outsourcing 8 (5) Cope with various intermediate storage buffer / outsourcing companies' application plan 10 (6) other Judge by response * The highest score of your choice is the score of the indicator

Production Process-Field Order Information Tracking Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A114 score  Optional (1) Impossible (no support is provided) 0 (2) Many documents must be read and searched because they are managed by documents. 2 (3) Partially automated, requires document viewing and navigation 4 (4) Monitoring can be done in order units (backtracking order information using monitoring information) 7 (5) First order information can be tracked under any circumstances 10

Production Process-Sales Division Determination of Delivery Date-Diagnosis Indicators-A115 score  Optional (1) No business support for the delivery date within the execution plan period 0 (2) It should take more than a week to respond. 2 (3) Possible reply after 2 ~ 3 days 4 (4) Possible delivery date within 1 ~ 2 hours 7 (5) Real-time inquiry of possible delivery date directly from sales department through internet 10

Production Process-Process Status Information Tracking Control Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A116 score  Multiple responses (1) Work process status 4 (2) Production Count (Lot Management or Inclusion) 3 (3) WIP inventory status 3 * Calculated as sum of scores for each item

Production Process-Product Completion Performance Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A117 score  Optional (1) not counted 0 (2) Only completion is counted 2 (3) The final product completion date and time of completion are counted 4 (4) Completion results of intermediate processing facilities are also counted. 7 (5) The le-diagnostic indicators-Ad time between transport facilities are also counted. 10

Production Process-Automated Process Level Information Aggregation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A118 score  Optional (1) not aggregated at all 0 (2) Only managed by handwritten documents 2 (3) Aggregated by manual and managed by Excel 4 (4) Managed by DB, aggregated by manual work 7 (5) It is automatically aggregated, logged, and reported by the linkage with the automation system and managed for future analysis by the process engineer. 10

Production Process-Product History Information Management Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A119 score  Optional (1) Does not manage the history information on the products produced 0 (2) Manually carry out history information on the products produced 2 (3) There is a system that manages the history information on the products, but only the rudimentary management is possible because the information is not registered easily. 4 (4) There is a system that manages the history information for the produced products, but has the history information for some products. 7 (5) History information such as development information, quality information, and performance information of all manufactured products is integrated and managed through the system. 10

Production Process-Productivity Analysis Automation Levels-Diagnostic Indicators-A120 score  Optional (1) Do not perform productivity analysis 0 (2) Manual productivity analysis 2 (3) There is a system for productivity analysis, but its use is insufficient because related information for productivity analysis is not properly secured. 4 (4) There is a system for productivity analysis, and the information is updated smoothly, but only a rudimentary analysis is possible. 7 (5) Systematic and in-depth productivity analysis is done through the system for productivity analysis. 10

Production Process-Inefficient Process Improvement Effort-Diagnostic Indicator-A121 score  Optional (1) No efforts are made to improve 0 (2) Proposal system is available 2 (3) Store the process history for 1 ~ 2 years for the engineer to review 4 (4) Improving efforts using process modeling tools based on stored process history information 7 (5) Developing process optimization methods using automated tools and applying them to the process 10 (6) other Judge by response

Production Process-Level of Process Analysis Technique Use-Diagnostic Indicator-A122 score  Multiple responses (1) Frequency distribution chart 2 (2) pareto 2 (3) Characteristic factors 2 (4) control chart 2 (5) Estimated verification technique 2 (6) correlation / regression analysis 2 (7) sampling inspection 2 (8) reliability technique 2 (9) other Judge by response * 2 points are added for each selection, and 10 points are taken for each point.

Production Process-Level of Linkage with Related Department Systems for Production Process Activities-Diagnostic Indicators-A123 score  Optional (1) The data is not shared at all 0 (2) Received as a file and used for production activities 2 (3) Connected on-line, but on-line interface is not established with some systems 4 (4) All related systems are connected on-line, but verification is required because of slow speed or low data accuracy. 7 (5) All related systems are connected on-line, and the necessary d-diagnostic indicator-At-diagnostic indicator-A can be obtained and utilized in real time. 10

Facility operation-Standardization level of facility operation procedures according to facility life cycle-Diagnostic indicators-A124 score  Optional (1) Not managed 0 (2) Managed autonomously based on the experience of the person in charge 2 (3) Facility work procedures are standardized only for some facility-related tasks, not for the entire facility life cycle. 4 (4) Comprehensive facility work procedures are standardized from the overall facility life cycle perspective (technical review, budgeting, installation, maintenance, and disposal). 7 (5) (4) + Uniform guidelines exist between departments and regional factories. 10

Facility operation-Equipment inspection work procedure standardization level-diagnosis index-A125 score  Optional (1) Does not have instructions for the procedure 0 (2) There are written instructions, but they are not actually processed accordingly. 4 (3) There are written instructions and work is carried out accordingly, but limited to some important specific installations. 7 (4) The written instructions are specified to cover all installations, differentiated according to the importance of the installation. 10

Facility Management-Classification Guidelines for Management Facilities and Establishment of Standards for Management-Diagnostic Indicators-A126 score  Optional (1) No guidelines and standards 0 (2) Classify and manage based on the judgment of specific facility managers 2 (3) Common management is carried out at the subunit level in the region, but there are gaps between factories. 4 (4) Standardization of equipment and materials classification standards and other codes at the regional plant level. 7 (5) The contents of 4) are integrated into the system according to the unified guidelines at the enterprise level. 10

Equipment Operation-Basic Guidelines for Maintenance and Maintenance-Diagnosis Indicators-A127 score  Optional (1) In most cases, maintenance is performed after equipment failure 0 (2) Carry out maintenance under preventive maintenance guidelines 2 (3) Carry out maintenance under the annual improvement plan 4 (4) Carry out maintenance under long-term plan (2 ~ 3 years) 7 (5) Carry out maintenance according to the company-wide equipment conservation strategy. 10

Facility Operation-Maintenance Cost Management Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A128 score  Optional (1) There is no systematic data collection method and no cost data remain 0 (2) Only some records of troubleshooting costs remain 2 (3) In addition to establishing maintenance budgets for each cause and equipment, cost management is also carried out for each facility. 4 (4) Continuously adjust the mean repair time (MTTR) and mean failure interval (MTBF), taking into account availability and maintenance costs. 7 (5) Continuously adjust the mean repair time (MTTR) and mean failure interval (MTBF), and fully manage the availability and maintenance cost information for the purpose of improving the efficiency of the facility. 10

Facility Operation-Utilization Level of the Conservation Act-Diagnostic Indicators-A129 score  Optional (1) Shut down all equipment and perform extensive repair activities. 0 (2) Preventive maintenance is carried out according to the period set based on time 2 (3) Preventive maintenance is carried out according to the period set based on time and usage. 4 (4) Some equipment performs preventive maintenance based on the condition 7 (5) Preventive maintenance is performed based on the model for each facility based on the reliability theory. 10

Facility operation-Automation level of facility maintenance-Diagnostic indicators-A130 score  Optional (1) Rely on manual labor 0 (2) It manages schedule planning and maintains data about materials necessary for maintenance. 2 (3) Equipped with an independent information system for facility maintenance 4 (4) Equipped with facility management information system related to materials, purchasing, and budget 7 (5) Information management is integrated with most related systems such as design, materials, budget, production management, and in-user management for the entire life cycle of the facility. 10

Facility Operation-Standardized Failure Codes and Guidelines Control Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A131 score  Optional (1) No list management and no instructions 0 (2) Self-management classifies and acts on the basis of the judgment of the specific facility manager. 2 (3) Common management at the subunit level in the region, but limited to specific major facilities 4 (4) There are common managed and uniform treatments at the regional plant level, but are also limited to specific installations. 7 (5) The contents of 4) are differentiated and managed for each type of equipment for all equipment. 10

Facility operation-Status of facility failure history analysis-Diagnostic indicators-A132 score  Optional (1) No data on failure history is collected for each facility 0 (2) Data on failure history by facility is collected but not managed. 2 (3) Management of equipment and failure history 4 (4) Failure mode effect analysis (FME-diagnosis indicator-A) and failure cause analysis (RCF-diagnosis indicator-A) are applied to some facilities. 7 (5) Failure mode effect analysis and failure cause analysis are applied according to the value-risk criteria. 10

Equipment Operation-Equipment Simulation Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A133 score  Optional (1) The collection of information from facility-related automation systems is not achieved. 0 (2) The level of information collected is insufficient, making it difficult to expect high utilization. 2 (3) The level of information that is collected and used for the report report by using a simple computing tool (Spre-diagnostic indicator-Ad Sheet, etc.). 4 (4) The level of information collected is high and the level of requirements for decision making through simulation is high, but the support system for this is insufficient. 7 (5) Equipped with a system for collecting, simulating, analyzing, and evaluating information, effectively utilizing the collected information. 10

Facility operation-Real-time inquiry level for facility abnormality result-diagnosis indicator-A134 score  Optional (1) Available through phone, F-diagnostic indicator-Ax, e-m-diagnostic indicator-Ail 0 (2) Real-time inquiry into the system for some facilities 5 (3) Real-time inquiry of the whole equipment by system 10

Facility operation-Level of system linkage with related departments for facility management activities-Diagnosis indicators-A135 score  Optional (1) The data is not shared at all 0 (2) Received as a file and used for production activities 2 (3) Connected on-line, but on-line interface is not established with some systems 4 (4) All related systems are connected on-line, but verification is required because of slow speed or low data accuracy. 7 (5) All related systems are connected on-line, and the necessary d-diagnostic indicator-At-diagnostic indicator-A can be obtained and utilized in real time. 10

Facility operation-Sharing of facility and material information for each plant-Diagnostic indicators-A136 score  Optional (1) Equipment and material information in each plant is not shared with each other 0 (2) Equipment and material information in each plant is shared by telephone, f-diagnostic indicator-Ax, etc. 2 (3) Equipment and material information in each factory is e-m-diagnostic indicator-Ail. Shared via 4 (4) Some of the equipment and material information in each plant is shared through the system. 7 (5) The equipment and material information in each plant is shared with the whole plant equipment and materials through the system. 10

Inventory Management-Leveled Inventory Policy-Diagnostic Indicators-A137 score  Optional (1) Only perform their defined tasks without sharing inventory-related policies 0 (2) There is a written inventory policy but it is not updated on time. 4 (3) Recently updated inventory policy is available and can be accessed if necessary 7 (4) Recently updated written inventory policy can be managed on the homepage or knowledge management center and can be referred to on-line. 10

Inventory management-Separate management level of raw and subsidiary materials, WIP and finished products-Diagnostic indicators-A138 score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Inventory Management-Raw Materials Inventory Management Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A139 score  Optional (1) No inventory management system 0 (2) There are standard guidelines for inventory management, but due diligence is not carried out regularly or irregularly. 2 (3) Due diligence is conducted regularly or irregularly, but there is a big difference between system inventory data and actual inventory. 4 (4) Analyze the cause of error in the difference between system inventory data and actual inventory to increase accuracy 7 (5) (4) + Inventory accuracy is maintained at 95-100% 10

Inventory Management-Finished Goods Inventory Management Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A140 score  Optional (1) No inventory management system 0 (2) There are standard guidelines for inventory management, but due diligence is not carried out regularly or irregularly. 2 (3) Due diligence is conducted regularly or irregularly, but there is a big difference between system inventory data and actual inventory. 4 (4) Analyze the cause of error in the difference between system inventory data and actual inventory to increase accuracy 7 (5) (4) + Inventory accuracy is maintained at 95-100% 10

Inventory Management-Unhealthy Raw Materials Inventory Management Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A141 score  Optional (1) There are no written guidelines for the definition of unhealthy inventory. 0 (2) It classifies unhealthy inventory into excess goods, boss goods, or obsolete inventory, but there is no clear provision for this. 2 (3) Regularly identify and batch out unhealthy inventory, but it takes considerable time to identify unhealthy inventory 4 (4) The inventory management system can identify unhealthy inventory in real time, but there is no clear treatment rule for unhealthy inventory. 7 (5) Since unhealthy inventory can be grasped in real time and the treatment regulations of the person in charge are specified, efforts to minimize unhealthy inventory are in progress at all times. 10

Inventory Management-Unfinished Finished Goods Inventory Management Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A142 score  Optional (1) There are no written guidelines for the definition of unhealthy inventory. 0 (2) It classifies unhealthy inventory into excess goods, boss goods, or obsolete inventory, but there is no clear provision for this. 2 (3) Regularly identify and batch out unhealthy inventory, but it takes considerable time to identify unhealthy inventory 4 (4) The inventory management system can identify unhealthy inventory in real time, but there is no clear treatment rule for unhealthy inventory. 7 (5) Since unhealthy inventory can be grasped in real time and the treatment regulations of the person in charge are specified, efforts to minimize unhealthy inventory are in progress at all times. 10

Inventory Management-How to Determine Stock Safety Inventory of Raw and Subsidiary Materials-Diagnostic Indicators-A143 score  Optional (1) Maintain a certain amount of inventory in order to avoid faults in the absence of critical raw materials rather than the concept of safety inventory. 0 (2) There is no need to consider safety inventory since it maintains sufficient inventory 2 (3) Based on the experience of the person in charge, the appropriate amount of safety inventory is maintained in consideration of the cost of maintaining the inventory. 4 (4) The person in charge decides the safety stock based on the case of developed company or domestic competitor. 7 (5) Regularly determine the allowable shortage of important raw and subsidiary materials in the meetings of persons in charge of each of the plates, and determine the amount of safety stocks 10

Inventory Management-How to Determine Stock Safety Inventory of Finished Products-Diagnostic Indicators-A144 score  Optional (1) Determine safety stocks based on experience 0 (2) Determine safety stocks based on the requirements of sales or sales departments 2 (3) Based on the experience of the person in charge, the amount of safety inventory is determined in consideration of the cost of inventory maintenance 4 (4) Determination of safety stock based on stock turnover of finished product 7 (5) Determination of safety inventory based on systematic and accurate data on product turnover, inventory maintenance cost and opportunity loss cost in case of stock-out compared to annual sales of the finished product 10

Inventory Management-Standardization of Workpiece Information Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A145 score  Optional (1) No management of work in process information 0 (2) Instead of using standardized forms for investigation of work in progress, each form should be filled out and managed by paper machine. 2 (3) The status of work in process is inspected in a standardized form and managed by hand 4 (4) Work in progress is managed by Excel on PC 7 (5) The status of work in process is automatically and periodically updated and updated online in DB. 10

Inventory Management-Work-in-Process Management-Diagnostic Indicators-A146 score Optional (1) There is no official guideline for the management of in-stock inventory, but the survey is conducted once a month for accounting purposes. 0 (2) Although there is a provision for the management of in-stock inventory, the actual in-stock inventory management is managed by the worker at the production site itself, and the reliability of data on the in-stock inventory is very low. 2 (3) Divided stocks of stocks into stocks of stocks and stocks and stocks of stocks are managed separately by the workers in the production site, but the reliability of the data is very high. 4 (4) Automatically manage work in stock through POP or other equipment, but the reliability of data is still low 7 (5) It automatically manages the inventory of work in process through POP or other equipment and secures very high reliability. 10

Inventory management-forecasting inventory and sales fluctuations-diagnostic indicators-a147 score  Optional (1) Not in use 0 (2) Out of the scope of work as it is carried out in the sales and production planning sector and only in the result of inventory management. 2 (3) Predict inventory and sales fluctuations by using moving average method, index smoothing method, etc. according to finished product items and reflect the result in inventory management. 4 (4) (3) Use seasonal index appropriately for items with + seasonal index. 7 (5) Accumulate data on forecasts and results and analyze the cause and reflect it on future forecasts. 10

Inventory Management-Storage and Storage Location Management Methods-Diagnostic Indicators-A148 score  Multiple responses (1) We manage the loading location by material / product 2 (2) It has a loc-diagnostic indicator-Ation m-diagnostic indicator-Ap that codes the loading position. 2 (3) Allocating load location by considering turnover, material / product characteristics, work line, etc. by material / product 2 (4) The materials / products are stored for first-in, first-out. 2 (5) The space utilization rate of warehouses is being increased through three-dimensional storage. 2 * 2 points are added for each selection, and 10 points are taken for each point.

Inventory Management-Level of Difference between Inventory Movement and Information Update-Diagnostic Indicator-A149 score  Optional (1) Record the receipt of goods in and out of the person in charge and transfer it to the inventory management department. 0 (2) Collect the input and output records of the real person after input by the person in charge 2 (3) In principle, direct input by the person in charge immediately after the movement of the object is not followed. 4 (4) direct input by the person in charge 7 (5) Automatically input through barcode system or RF machine immediately after moving the object 10

Inventory Management-Automation Levels by Inventory Type -Diagnostic Indicators -A150 score  Multiple responses (1) current warehouse inventory (2) expected inventory (3) stock in transit (4) In-Stock Inspection (5) Stop Stock (6) consignment stock (7) President's stock or surplus stock (8) Inventory during reinspection (9) other * 0 points for 0 points, 2 points for 1-2 pieces, 4 points for 3-4 pieces, 7 points for 5-6 pieces, 10 points for 7 or more pieces

Inventory Management-Automation Levels by Inventory Transaction Type-Diagnostic Indicators-A151 score  Duplicate Selection (1) Raw materials subsidiary (2) open the finished product (3) Escalation Transactions (4) Return on raw and subsidiary materials (5) Finished product return transaction (6) scheduled transaction (7) other * 0 points for 0 points, 3 points for 1-2 points, 6 points for 3-4 points, 10 points for 5 or more points

Inventory Management-Automation Level by Inventory Place Type-Diagnostic Indicators-A152 score  Optional (1) Office (2) Logistics Center (3) Raw materials warehouse (4) Completed warehouse (5) process (6) consignment warehouse (7) single storage room (8) General Storage Room (9) other * 0 points for 0 points, 2 points for 1-2 pieces, 4 points for 3-4 pieces, 7 points for 5-6 pieces, 10 points for 7 or more pieces

Inventory Management-ATP Support Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A153 score  Optional (1) Not supported but plan to add 4 (2) Calculate the quantity available up to a certain day among the quantity ordered based on the current stock 7 (3) Understand the current inventory and production capacity to calculate the shortest delivery date for order quantities 10

Inventory Management-Barcode and RF Processing Functional Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A154 score  Optional (1) Does not utilize barcode 0 (2) Barcode processing is available but currently does not support barcode processing. 2 (3) Will include barcode processing in the future (within one year) 4 (4) Bar codes are used for the entry and exit of some raw and subsidiary materials and finished products. 7 (5) Bar codes are used to record incoming and outgoing raw materials and finished products. 10

Inventory Management-Load Level Management Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A155 score  Optional (1) less than 20% 0 (2) 20-40% 2 (3) 40-60% 4 (4) 60-80% 7 (5) 80% or more 10 (6) Not applicable - * If you select N / A, it will not be reflected in the score.

Inventory Management-Physical Inventory Movement Management Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A156 score  Optional (1) less than 20% 0 (2) 20-40% 2 (3) 40-60% 4 (4) 60-80% 7 (5) 80% or more 10 (6) Not applicable - * If you select N / A, it will not be reflected in the score.

Inventory Management-Material Receipt and Stock Information Online Inquiry Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A157 score  Optional (1) Inquiry on goods receipt and stock information through telephone, F-diagnostic indicator-Ax, e-m-diagnostic indicator-Ail 0 (2) There is a system that manages goods receipt and inventory information, but the data is inaccurate and cannot be used properly. 2 (3) The system can accurately identify the items and quantities of some materials currently held by the system. 4 (4) The system can accurately identify the items and quantity of all materials 7 (5) Predict inventory levels at any point in time by identifying not only the materials you have but also the expected quantity of goods received. 10

Inventory Management-Trace Level of Product-Pallet Units-Diagnostic Indicators-A158- (1) score  Optional (1) not tracked 0 (2) Tracking from part to finished product 4 (3) Tracking from raw materials to finished products 7 (4) Tracking from start to finish 10

Inventory Management-Tracking Level of the Product-Box-Diagnostic Indicator-A158- (2) score  Optional (1) not tracked 0 (2) Tracking from part to finished product 4 (3) Tracking from raw materials to finished products 7 (4) Tracking from start to finish 10

Inventory Management-Trace Level of Product-Lot Units-Diagnostic Indicators-A158- (3) score  Optional (1) not tracked 0 (2) Tracking from part to finished product 4 (3) Tracking from raw materials to finished products 7 (4) Tracking from start to finish 10

Inventory Management-Automation Level for Material / Part / Goods Receipt and Inspection Process-Diagnostic Indicator-A159 score  Optional (1) Manual work occurs during the receipt and inspection of materials / goods, resulting in a lot of delay time. 0 (2) Partially automated material / goods receipt process 4 (3) Automate the process of goods and goods receipt through barcode and RFID and utilize automated warehouse 7 (4) The supplier notifies the receipt process in advance through advance shipment notice (-diagnostic indicator-ASN). 10

Inventory Management-Quantitative Management of Inventory Costs-Diagnostic Indicators-A160 score  Optional (1) not managed 0 (2) There is no model for the lack of inventory, but there is a lack of inventory for the key management items. 2 (3) We have a linear out-of-stock cost model for the key management items, but none have been verified. 4 (4) Model of cost of inventory shortage based on experience by key management items 7 (5) A satisfactory stock shortage cost model for key management items 10

Inventory Management-Level of Linkage with Related Department Systems for Inventory Management Activities-Diagnostic Indicators-A161 score  Optional (1) The data is not shared at all 0 (2) Received as a file and used for production activities 2 (3) Connected on-line, but on-line interface is not established with some systems 4 (4) All related systems are connected on-line, but verification is required because of slow speed or low data accuracy. 7 (5) All related systems are connected on-line, and the necessary d-diagnostic indicator-At-diagnostic indicator-A can be obtained and utilized in real time. 10

Inventory Management-How to Manage Inventory by Supplier Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A162 score  Optional (1) not considered 0 (2) Though it was considered, it was not carried out due to various problems such as the cost of building infrastructure with suppliers. 2 (3) Although some raw and subsidiary materials are used, they are not effective. 4 (4) Some raw and subsidiary materials are carried out and will be expanded to other raw and subsidiary materials by supplementing the shortcomings. 7 (5) Effectively implemented through the Internet or V-diagnostic indicators-AN. 10

Quality Management-Quality Management Organization and System Levels-Diagnostic Indicators-A163 score  Optional (1) none 0 (2) Under construction 5 (3) has been established 10

Quality Control-Worker's QC Tool Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A164 score  Optional (1) not used at all 0 (2) rarely utilized 2 (3) convenience to use 4 (4) Almost used 7 (5) very useful 10

Quality Control-Quality Inspection Standards Regulatory Levels-Diagnostic Indicators-A165 score  Optional (1) The quality inspection standard is not specified 0 (2) There is a prescribed quality inspection standard, but it is not regularly revised. 5 (3) There is a prescribed quality inspection standard and it is regularly revised. 10

Quality Management-Quality Control Activity Regulation Levels-Diagnostic Indicators-A166 score  Multiple responses (1) clarify the verification procedure for purchases; 2 (2) Clearly define the main processes that affect the quality of each product 2 (3) Clearly define in-process inspection methods 2 (4) Clear regulation of optimum process condition for quality control of each process 2 (5) Rules of procedure for final inspection, final testing of the product 2 (6) Provision of procedures for handling, storage, packaging and delivery of products 2 (7) stipulate management procedures in tracking 2 (8) Regulation of corrective action procedures for quality problems 2 * 2 points are added for each selection, and 10 points are taken for each point.

Quality Management-Nonconforming Product Evaluation and Management System Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A167 score  Multiple responses (1) The criteria for evaluation and management of nonconforming product are clearly defined. 2 (2) The person in charge and the person in charge of the evaluation is clear. 2 (3) The subjects and methods and timing of evaluation are clearly defined. 2 (4) It clearly records the evaluation contents (the status of nonconforming product, the results of inspection, etc., the labeling results, the validity of the result of nonconformity, the effect of the degree of nonconformity after the next process, etc.). 2 (5) The person responsible for evaluating and managing the validity and validity of nonconforming product evaluation work is clearly defined. 2 * 2 points are added for each selection, and 10 points are taken for each point.

Quality Control-Level of Implementing Technology-Six Sigma-Diagnostic Indicators-A168- (1) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

QC-Level of implementation of technology related to pain-TQM-Diagnostic Indicator-A168- (2) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Quality Control-Level of Implementing Technology-Continuous Improvement Program-Diagnostic Indicators-A168- (3) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Quality Control-Level of Implementing Technology-Defect Tracking-Diagnostic Indicators-A168- (4) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Quality Control-Level of Implementing Technology-Statistical Process Management (SPC) -Diagnostic Indicators-A168- (5) score  Optional (1) not implemented 0 (2) - 2 (3) partially implemented 4 (4) - 7 (5) fully implemented 10

Quality Management-Acquisition Level of Domestic and Overseas Quality Certification System (ISO 9000, etc.)-Diagnostic Indicators-A169 score  Optional (1) Not acquired at present 0 (2) It is not acquired but is preparing for 5 (3) currently acquired 10

Quality Control-Process Monitoring and Control Practice-Diagnostic Indicators-A170 score  Multiple responses (1) The control point of process or product is clearly defined 1.5 (2) Monitoring and management procedures are planned and prescribed. 1.5 (3) Processes requiring monitoring are identified 1.5 (4) The person responsible for monitoring and management is clearly defined 1.5 (5) The required tests and inspection levels are used appropriately. 1.5 (6) Statistical process control methods are used appropriately. 1.5 (7) Surveillance is in place and records are kept. 1.5 (8) If abnormalities occur, clearly define the procedures for action. 1.5 (9) Evaluate the validity and effectiveness of process monitoring and control. 1.5 * Each time you choose, 1.5 points will be added.

Quality Management-Process Quality Information Real-time Inquiry Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A171 score  Optional (1) Process quality information is not aggregated in the system 0 (2) Process quality information is aggregated into the system, but the data is inaccurate 4 (3) Process quality information is aggregated into the system, but data reliability is high. 6 (4) Process quality information is aggregated on the system, data reliability is high, and some departments can make real-time inquiry on-line. 8 (5) Process quality information is aggregated on the system, data reliability is high, and all relevant departments can be viewed in real time on-line. 10

Quality Management-Range of process quality information managed by the system-Diagnostic indicators-A172 score  Optional (1) There is no special quality management system, and related data is analyzed using statistical package. 4 (2) Quality-related data of some manufacturing processes and data on goods received are managed through the system. 7 (3) The company manages all quality-related data in a single system. 10

Quality Control-Flexible Quality Data Collection Levels in Process and Product Changes-Diagnostic Indicators-A173 score  Optional (1) I do not have 0 (2) Not easy but possible. 5 (3) Can cope flexibly 10

Quality Control-Defect Cause Analysis Statistical Technique Use Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A174 score  Optional (1) no experience 0 (2) Identifying the causes of quality problems and establishing their solutions usually depends on the experience of field experts. 2 (3) Requested mainly from external experts to solve quality problems 4 (4) In the event of quality problems, the cause and solution should be sought by a team of field experts and internal statistics specialists. 7 (5) In the event of quality problems, a team of field experts and internal statistics specialists have successfully identified the cause and suggested a solution. 10

Quality Control-Automated Level Tracking and Analysis of Defect Cause-Diagnostic Indicator-A175 score  Optional (1) No trace of bad cause 0 (2) Defect cause tracking is performed by manual 2 (3) Part of the product life cycle traces the cause of defect through the system 4 (4) For some products, the cause of defects is tracked through the system throughout the entire life cycle (from raw material purchase to product delivery). 7 (4) Throughout the system, tracking of the cause of defects is carried out throughout the entire life cycle (from raw material purchase to product delivery). 10

Quality Management-Classification and Control of Quality Costs-Diagnostic Indicators-A176 score  Multiple responses (1) Producer quality costs from the producer's point of view 2 (2) Operating quality cost at the production site 2 (3) Supplier quality costs at the supplier's point of view 2 (4) Quality assurance costs at the seller's point of view 2 (5) User quality cost in the consumer position 2 (6) Converting the importance of quality problems in the social position into monetary value 2 (7) other 2 * 2 points are added for each selection, and 10 points are taken for each point.

QA-Automated Quality Cost Measurement Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A177 score  Optional (1) No measurement of quality costs 0 (2) Manual measurement of quality cost 4 (3) Measuring the cost of quality through the system, but requires some manual work 7 (4) Measuring the cost of quality automatically through the system 10

Quality Management-Related departments for quality control activities-Diagnosis indicators-A178 score  Optional (1) Does not consider the linkage between related departments 0 (2) In the event of a defect, the opportunity for process or business improvement is often lost by not promptly notifying the preceding process or the preceding organization. 2 (3) Prompt business connection between related departments is not specified, but business support is provided implicitly among the staff in charge. 4 (4) Prompt work linkages between related departments are specified but not followed. 7 (5) Prompt work linkage between related departments is written and actually done quickly. 10

Quality management-Level of system linkage with relevant departments for quality management activities-Diagnostic indicators-A179 score  Optional (1) The data is not shared at all 0 (2) Received as a file and used for production activities 2 (3) Connected on-line, but on-line interface is not established with some systems 4 (4) All related systems are connected on-line, but verification is required because of slow speed or low data accuracy. 7 (5) All related systems are connected on-line, and the necessary d-diagnostic indicator-At-diagnostic indicator-A can be obtained and utilized in real time. 10

Tables 289 to 400 below are subdiagnostic groups and diagnostic indicators related to manufacturing performance.

Reliability-Production Plan Achievement-Measurement-Diagnostic Indicator-A180- (1) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reliability-Production Plan Achievement Rate-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (1) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Production Plan Achievement-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A180- (1) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Production Plan Achievement Rate-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (1) -d score Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Reliability-Material Requirements Estimation Accuracy-Measurement-Diagnosis Indicators-A180- (2) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reliability-Material Requirements Estimation Accuracy-Measuring Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (2) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Material Requirements Estimation Accuracy-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (2) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Material Requirements Estimation Accuracy-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (2) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Reliability-Supply Delivery Compliance Rate-Whether or not to measure-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (3) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reliability-Supply Delivery Compliance Rate-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (3) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Delivery Date of Delivery-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (3) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Supply Delivery Compliance Rate-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (3) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Reliability-Defective Rate of Procurement-Measurement-Diagnostic Indicator-A180- (4) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reliability-Defective Rate of Supplies-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (4) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Defective Rate of Supplies-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (4) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Defective Rate of Supplies-Performance Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (4) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Reliability-Production Schedule Compliance Rate-Whether to Measure-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (5) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reliability-Production Schedule Compliance Rate-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (5) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Production Schedule Compliance Rate-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (5) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Production Schedule Compliance Rate-Performance Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (5) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Reliability-Productivity (Yield) -Measurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (6) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reliability-Productivity (Yield)-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (6) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Productivity (Yield) -Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A180- (6) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Productivity (Yield)-Performance Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (6) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Reliability-Inventory Error Rate-Measurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (7) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reliability-Inventory Error Rate-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (7) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Inventory Error Rate-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (7) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Inventory Error Rate-Performance Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (7) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Reliability-Leakage Rate-Measurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (8) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reliability-Leakage Rate-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (8) -b score Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 8 (3) weekly 7 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 5 * Base score 2

Reliability-Leakage Rate-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (8) -c score Optional (1) Real time 8 (2) daily 7 (3) weekly 6 (4) monthly 5 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Leakage Rate-Performance Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (8) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Reliability-Process Defectiveness-Measurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (9) -a score Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reliability-Process Defective Rate-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (9) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Process Defect Rate-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (9) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reliability-Process Defective Rate-Performance Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A180- (9) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Responsiveness-Production Plan Lead Time-Measurement-Diagnostic Indicator-A181- (1) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reactivity-Production Plan Lead Time-Measuring Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (1) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Responsiveness-Production Plan Lead Time-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A181- (1) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Responsiveness-Production Plan Lead Time-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicator-A181- (1) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Responsiveness-Material Procurement Lead Time-Measurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (2) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Responsiveness-Procurement Lead Time-Measuring Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (2) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Responsiveness-Material Procurement Lead Time-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicator-A181- (2) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Responsiveness-Procurement Lead Time-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicator-A181- (2) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Reactivity-Production Lead Time-Measurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (3) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Reactivity-Production Lead Time-Measuring Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (3) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reactivity-Production Lead Time-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (3) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Reactivity-Production Lead Time-Performance Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (3) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Reactivity-Throughput Rate-Measurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (4) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Responsiveness-Throughput Rate-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (4) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Responsiveness-Throughput Rate-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (4) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Responsiveness-Throughput Rate-Performance Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A181- (4) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Flexibility-Change in production plan-Whether to measure-Diagnostic indicators-A182- (1) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Flexibility-Rate of change of production plan-Measuring cycle-Diagnostic indicator-A182- (1) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Flexibility-Change rate of production plan-Automation level-Diagnostic indicators-A182- (1) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Flexibility-Change rate of production plan-Performance value-Diagnostic indicators-A182- (1) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Flexibility-Average time to prepare for work-Whether to measure-Diagnostic indicators-A182- (2) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Flexibility-Average time to prepare for work-measuring cycles-diagnostic indicators-A182- (2) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Flexibility-Average time to prepare for work-Automation level-Diagnostic indicators-A182- (2) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Flexibility-Average time to prepare for work-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicators-A182- (2) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Cost-Total Cost of Production-Measurement-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (1) -a score Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Cost-total production cost-measurement cycle-diagnostic indicators -A183- (1) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Gross Production Cost-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (1) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Total Cost of Production-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicator-A183- (1) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Cost-Inventory Turnover-Measurement-Diagnosis Indicators-A183- (2) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Cost-Inventory Turnover-Measuring Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (2) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Inventory Turnover-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (2) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Inventory Turnover-Performance Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (2) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Cost-Average Daily Inventory-Measurement-Diagnosis Indicators-A183-(3)-A score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Cost-Average Daily Inventory-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (3) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Average Daily Inventory-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (3) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Average Daily Inventory-Performance Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (3) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Cost-Average Process Inventory-Whether to Measure-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (4) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Cost-Average Process Inventory-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (4) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Average Process Inventory-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (4) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Average Process Inventory-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (4) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Cost-Obsolescence Inventory-Measurement-Diagnosis Indicators-A183- (5) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Cost-Obsolescence Inventory-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (5) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Obsolescence Inventory-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (5) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Obsolescence Inventory-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (5) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Cost-Inventory Cost-Measurement-Diagnosis Indicators-A183- (6) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Cost-Inventory Cost-Measurement Cycle-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (6) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Inventory Cost-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (6) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Inventory Cost-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (6) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Cost-Quality Assurance Cost-Measurement-Diagnosis Indicators-A183- (7) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Cost-QA Cost-Measuring Cycle-Diagnostic Indicator-A183- (7) -b score Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Quality Assurance Cost-Automation Level-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (7) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Cost-Quality Assurance Cost-Outcome Values-Diagnostic Indicators-A183- (7) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Resource utilization-Production line utilization rate-Measurement status-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (1) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Resource utilization-Production line utilization rate-Measuring cycle-Diagnostic indicator-A184- (1) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource utilization-Production line utilization rate-Automation level-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (1) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource utilization-Production line utilization rate-Performance value-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (1) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Resource utilization-Recovery rate-Measurement-Diagnosis indicators-A184- (2) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Resource utilization-Recovery rate-Measurement cycle-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (2) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource utilization-Recovery rate-Automation level-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (2) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource Utilization-Recovery-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicators-A184- (2) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Resource utilization-Loss rate-Measurement-Diagnosis indicator-A184- (3) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Resource utilization-Loss rate-Measurement cycle-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (3) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource utilization-Loss rate-Automation level-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (3) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource utilization-Loss rate-Performance value-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (3) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Resource utilization-Worker efficiency-Measurement-Diagnosis indicators-A184- (4) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Resource utilization-Worker efficiency-Measuring cycle-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (4) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource utilization-Worker efficiency-Automation level-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (4) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource utilization-Worker efficiency-performance value-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (4) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Resource utilization-Average overtime hours per week-Whether or not to measure-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (5) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Resource utilization-Average overtime hours per week-Measuring cycle-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (5) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource utilization-Average overtime hours per week-Automation level-Diagnostic indicators-A184- (5) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource Utilization-Average Overtime Hours-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicators-A184- (5) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

Resource utilization-Overall efficiency of equipment-Whether to measure-Diagnosis indicator-A184- (6) -a score  Optional (1) yes 10 (2) No 0

Resource utilization-Equipment overall efficiency-Measuring cycle-Diagnostic indicator-A184- (6) -b score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource utilization-Overall efficiency of facilities-Automation level-Diagnostic index-A184- (6) -c score  Optional (1) Real time 10 (2) daily 9 (3) weekly 8 (4) monthly 6 (5) years 4 * Base score 2

Resource Utilization-Overall Equipment Efficiency-Performance Value-Diagnostic Indicators-A184- (6) -d score  Open Apply the method of equal scale according to the distribution of participating companies (determine after receiving the questionnaire to give a score ranging from μ to σ) (2,4,6,8,10) -

The lower diagnosis group constituting the diagnosis group or the diagnostic index items constituting the lower diagnosis group may have the same weights, but more preferably have different weights. In this case, a method of assigning a weight to each sub-diagnosis group or a diagnostic index item may be applied to the method of weighting each item based on the questionnaire by the AHP survey for the expert set. The following are manufacturing strategy diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB, manufacturing organization diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB, manufacturing IT diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB, manufacturing process diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB constituting the manufacturing process diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB, manufacturing An example of the performance diagnosis evaluation weighting policy DB is shown.

Tables 401 to 420 are weights of processing AHP survey results for a lower diagnosis group having at least one layer constituting the diagnosis group.

Manufacturing Strategy Establishment Diagnostic Index Items weight Enterprise manufacturing strategy establishment level 0.2087 Level of linkage between manufacturing strategy and other strategies-Linking enterprise-wide and manufacturing strategy 0.1670 Level of linkage between manufacturing strategy and other strategies-Linking supply chain strategy with manufacturing strategy 0.1452 Level of linkage between manufacturing strategy and other strategies-Link between customer management strategy and manufacturing strategy 0.1470 Level of linkage between manufacturing strategy and other strategies-Linkage between manufacturing strategy and information strategy 0.1452 Level of detailed strategy establishment by sector 0.0835 Systematic level of manufacturing strategy establishment process 0.1035

Manufacturing Strategy Promotion Diagnostic Index Items weight Derivation level of detailed task for manufacturing strategy 0.2778 Priority selection and evaluation of detailed implementation tasks for manufacturing strategy 0.3333 Level of detailed implementation tasks for manufacturing strategy 0.3889

Manufacturing Strategy Performance Management Diagnostic Index Items weight Manufacturing strategy performance evaluation system establishment and execution level 0.2426 Level of goal setting to achieve manufacturing strategy 0.1507 Definition of Manufacturing Strategy Performance Measure Index and Performance Management Level 0.1820 Manufacturing Strategy Performance Evaluation Result Monitoring Level 0.1820 Level of Feedback on Performance Evaluation of Manufacturing Strategy 0.2426

Manufacturing Organization Structure and Culture Diagnostic Indicators weight Organizational Structure of Manufacturing Organization 0.0742 Manufacturing Organization R & R Establishment Level 0.0549 Level of skill and capability definition by role of manufacturing organization 0.1113 Circulation level according to work skill and difficulty 0.1291 Communication level in manufacturing organization 0.1854 Mentoring culture level in manufacturing organization 0.1484 Yumu, the organization responsible for manufacturing improvement and innovation 0.1484 Level of joint project execution from a manufacturing improvement or innovation perspective 0.1484

Workforce Mind Diagnostic Indicators weight CEO's awareness of manufacturing improvement and innovation 0.1429 The level of CEO's clear manufacturing improvement and innovation goals 0.1429 Level of CEO's Participation in Manufacturing Improvement and Innovation Activities 0.1429 Executive level of manufacturing improvement and innovation awareness and participation 0.1000 Manufacturing Workers' Awareness and Participation in Manufacturing Improvement and Innovation 0.1000 Manufacturing Workers' Participation in Manufacturing Improvement and Innovation IT Projects 0.1000 Percentage of Manufacturing Workers' Participation in Self-directed or Empowered Work Teams 0.0571 Manufacturing Participation Levels of Manufacturing Workers 0.1143 Level of Performance Measurement System of Manufacturing Workers 0.1000

Manufacturing personnel knowledge and skill diagnosis index items weight Manufacturing Status of Qualified Personnel-Domestic Advanced Certification 0.0166 Status of Qualification Manpower-Manufacturing Certificate 0.0255 Manufacturing Status Qualifications-Internationally Qualified Certification 0.0166 Status of Innovation Experts-6 Sigma Champions 0.0320 Status of innovation specialists-Master Black Belt 0.0243 Status of Innovative Experts-Black Belt 0.0576 Status of innovation specialists-Green Belt 0.0499 Status of Innovation Activity Experts-Company-wide Production Conservation (TPM) Experts 0.0409 Status of Innovation Activity Experts-Toyota Production System (TPS) Experts 0.0409 Retention of Innovation Experts-External Consultants / Consultants 0.0332 Status of innovation activity specialists-Others related to certification of manufacturing innovation 0.0499 Level of Qualification Support for Manufacturing Workers 0.0499 Multifunctional manpower ratio 0.0332 Manufacturing expertise management system 0.0665 Level of Manufacturing Manuals 0.0742 Manufacturing Manpower Development System and Implementation Level 0.0665 Establish annual training plan for manufacturing personnel Run level 0.0499 Manpower Training Program 0.0576 Manpower Training Time 0.0409 IT training contents and time for manufacturing personnel-OA / Internet 0.0409 IT training contents and time of manufacturing personnel-User field of information system 0.0499 IT training content and time for manufacturing personnel-Information technology 0.0499 IT training content and time for manufacturing personnel-Other 0.0332

Manufacturing IT Organization and Competency Assessment Metrics weight Presence of Information Dept. 0.0550 Informatization officer 0.0477 Informatization Promotion Manpower and Manufacturing Manpower-Total Informatization Manpower (2010) 0.0347 Informatization Promotion Manpower and Dedicated Manpower in Manufacturing Sector-Dedicated Informatization Manpower in Manufacturing Sector (2010) 0.0477 Weight of Manufacturing Sector Compared to Total Informatization 0.0550 Informatization Strategic Plan and Manufacturing Informatization Strategic Plan 0.0477 Recognition level of information strategy plan of members-CEO 0.0687 Awareness Level of Informatization Strategic Plan of Members 0.0622 Awareness Level of Informatization Strategic Plan of Organization Members-Workers in Manufacturing 0.0550 Information investment in manufacturing sector 0.0412 Information investment budget (2010) 0.0412 Informatization Outsourcing Level of Manufacturing Sector-Introduction of Outsourcing 0.0340 Informatization Outsourcing Level of Manufacturing-Outsourcing Performance Ratio 0.0340 Information system operating guidelines and procedures-Information system operating guidelines and procedures 0.0412 Information System Operation Guidelines and Procedures-Information System Project Management and Procedures 0.0412 Information system operation guidelines and procedures-Information system evaluation, supervision guidelines and procedures 0.0340 Information System Operation Guidelines and Procedures-Information System Change Management Guidelines and Procedures 0.0340 Information Systems Operating Guidelines and Procedures-Guidelines and Procedures for Information Systems Equipment Management Standards 0.0340 Information System Operation Guidelines and Procedures-Guidelines and Procedures for Information System Emergency Recovery Plans 0.0412 Information system operating guidelines and procedures-Guidelines and procedures for managing information system security 0.0412 Information Systems Operating Guidelines and Procedures-Guidelines and Procedures for IT Organization Management and Evaluation 0.0340 Information System Operation Guidelines and Procedures-Other 0.0340 Information infrastructure and system evaluation level 0.0412

Manufacturing IT Infra Diagnostic Indicators Item weight Infrastructure type 0.0502 Information equipment diffusion level 0.0404 Network environment 0.1011 Network construction scope 0.1011 Internet connection method 0.0502 Backup system construction level 0.0809 Information system security management level 0.1011 Information Security Activity Level-Establish Information Security Policy 0.0809 Information Security Activity Levels-Information Security Education and Training 0.1011 Information Security Activity Level-Facility Security 0.0607 Information Security Activity Level-Network Security 0.0809 Information Security Activity Level-Service Server Security 0.0809 Information Security Activity Level-Personal Computer Security 0.0705

Manufacturing IT Application Diagnostic Indicator Items weight Manufacturing Sector Information System Application Stage 0.0282 MES introduction and utilization 0.0407 Whether to introduce and use SPC or SQC 0.0282 Whether to introduce and utilize PLM / PPM 0.0288 QMS introduction and utilization 0.0244 Whether to use LIMS 0.0244 Whether to introduce and use ERP 0.0282 Whether to use and use SCM 0.0244 Whether to adopt and use CRM 0.0207 RFID Introduction and Use 0.0163 Introduction and utilization of BI 0.0125 Whether to introduce and use BRM 0.0163 Material Management System-Introduction / Use of Information Technology 0.0282 Material Management System-Function Construction Level 0.0157 Material Management System-Information Technology Business Support Level 0.0238 Product Management System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology 0.0244 Product Management System-Function Construction Level 0.0119 Product Management System-Information Technology Support Level 0.0201 Resource Management System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology 0.0207 Resource management system-function level 0.0119 Resource Management System-Information Technology Business Support Level 0.0163 Facility Management System-Information Technology 0.0282 Facility Management System-Function Construction Level 0.0157 Facility Management System-Information Technology Support Level 0.0238 Process Management System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology 0.0288 Process management system-function level 0.0163 Process Management System-Information Technology Business Support Level 0.0244 Production technology system-Information technology introduction / utilization 0.0326 Production Technology System-Function Construction Level 0.0201 Production Technology System-Information Technology Business Support Level 0.0282 Production Planning System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology 0.0326 Production Planning System-Function Construction Level 0.0201 Production Planning System-Information Technology Business Support Level 0.0282 Quality Management System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology 0.0244 Quality Management System-Function Construction Level 0.0163 Quality Management System-Information Technology Support Level 0.0119 Field operation system-Introduction / use of information technology 0.0326 Field operating system-function level 0.0201 Field operation system-information technology support level 0.0244 Procurement Management System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology 0.0244 Procurement Management System-Function Level 0.0119 Procurement Management System-Information Technology Support Level 0.0163 Data Management System-Introduction / Utilization of Information Technology 0.0244 Data Management System-Function Construction Level 0.0119 Data Management System-Information Technology Business Support Level 0.0163

Production plan diagnostic index item weight BOM / Recipe Standardization Level 0.0580 Standard production plan (MPS) establishment system 0.0435 Automated Level of Establishment of Standard Production Plan (MPS) 0.0435 Sales reflection and demand plan automatic reflection level 0.0506 How Time Fence Works 0.0361 Material Requirements Planning System 0.0435 Material Requirements Planning Automation Level 0.0290 Production Availability Management Automation Level 0.0580 Importance of each change factor of baseline production plan, establishment and compliance of change procedure-Raw material quality 0.0435 Significance, change procedure, and compliance by baseline production plan change-Design change 0.0435 Importance of each change factor of base production plan, establishment of change procedure and compliance-Lack of production capacity (machine failure, etc.) 0.0435 Significance, change procedure establishment and compliance by factor of base production plan change-Production strategy change 0.0361 Importance, change procedure establishment and compliance by each factor for change of standard production plan-Quality (defect) 0.0435 Importance, change procedure establishment and compliance by each change factor of standard production plan-urgent order 0.0580 Importance of each change factor of base production plan, establishment of change procedure and compliance-Order change (quantity, delivery date, etc.) 0.0580 Importance of each change factor of base production plan, establishment and compliance of change procedure-Other 0.0435 What-if Simulation Level 0.0290 Automation level of product production performance aggregation 0.0580 Analysis of performance difference compared to production plan and grassland method 0.0580 Level of Linkage with Related Departments for Production Planning 0.0580 How to plan production between different plants / lines 0.0363 Level of sharing of production plans with supply chain partners 0.0290

Material Procurement Diagnostic Index Items weight Level of policy establishment for procurement and outsourcing 0.0952 Code and control item standardization level of procurement 0.0833 How to Plan a Material Procurement 0.0833 How to operate material procurement order cycle 0.0476 Material Requirements Planning (MRP) Utilization Level 0.0833 Flexible adjustment level of procurement plan 0.0833 Procurement Unit Price Estimation Method 0.0476 Online procurement level 0.0476 Online Procurement Scale 0.0476 Purchase Order Progress Real-time Monitoring Level 0.0833 How to deal with delays and defects in supplies 0.0833 Supplier history and evaluation result management level 0.0476 Related department system linkage level for procurement activities 0.0714 Information provided electronically to suppliers 0.0476 Information electronically provided by the supplier 0.0476

Production process diagnostic index items weight Process Routing Standardization Level 0.0346 Factors to consider when planning process / line operation 0.0260 Automation level of process / line operation planning 0.0260 Computer Aided Process / Line Operation Planning Task 0.0260 Lot introduction and utilization level in process operation 0.0346 Layout placement level 0.0389 Line Balancing Level 0.0260 Production schedule planning method 0.0346 Production schedule planning automation level 0.0173 Work Order Standard Time Setting Level 0.0346 Workbook standardization level 0.0303 Workbook compliance level 0.0303 Automated work schedule and manpower management 0.0260 Application level of the latest manufacturing techniques-Conversion speed improvement technology 0.0260 Application level of the latest manufacturing techniques-Focused-factory production systems 0.0260 Application level of the latest manufacturing techniques-JIT / continuous-flow production 0.0260 Application level of the latest manufacturing techniques-Cell manufacturing method 0.0260 Application of the latest manufacturing techniques-Lot-size reduction technology 0.0260 Application of the latest manufacturing techniques-predictive and preventive maintenance 0.0260 Application of the latest manufacturing techniques-Pull system / Kanban 0.0260 Level of application of the latest manufacturing techniques-cooperation of design and production staff in the design of new products 0.0216 Application of the latest manufacturing techniques-operator based maintenance 0.0216 Automation level compared to the whole process 0.0260 Process yield prediction model building level 0.0173 How to process urgent order 0.0346 Countermeasures against facility failure 0.0346 Field Order Tracking Level 0.0260 Determination of Sales Lead Date 0.0261 Process status information tracking management level 0.0346 Product Completion Performance Aggregation Level 0.0346 Process level information aggregation automation level 0.0260 Product history information management automation level 0.0260 Productivity Analysis Automation Levels 0.0217 Inefficient Process Improvement Effort Level 0.0303 Level of Fair Analysis Techniques 0.0260 Related department system linkage level for production process activities 0.0260

Facility operation indicators weight Standardization of facility work procedures according to facility life cycle 0.0942 Facility inspection work standardization level 0.0820 Level of classification guidelines and management standards for facilities 0.0820 Basic Guidelines and Maintenance Points for Maintenance 0.0707 Maintenance cost management level 0.0707 Utilization level of maintenance method 0.0707 Facility maintenance automation level 0.0707 Standardized fault code and guideline level of control 0.0707 Status of failure history analysis of equipment 0.0707 Facility simulation level 0.0820 Real-time inquiry level of facility abnormality result 0.0942 Related department system linkage level for facility management activities 0.0707 Facility and material information sharing level for each plant 0.0707

Inventory management diagnostic index item weight Established Inventory Policy Level 0.0447 Separate management level of raw and subsidiary materials, WIP and finished products 0.0514 Raw Material Inventory Management Level 0.0447 Finished product inventory management level 0.0514 Unhealthy Raw Materials Inventory Management Level 0.0385 Unhealthy Finished Goods Inventory Management Level 0.0385 How to Determine Stock Safety Inventory of Raw Subsidiary Materials 0.0385 How to Determine Stock Safety Inventory of Finished Products 0.0385 Standardization of Workpiece Information Standardization 0.0514 Work in Process Management 0.0514 How to forecast inventory and sales fluctuations 0.0257 How to store and how to manage 0.0319 Level of difference between inventory movement and information update 0.0257 Automation level by stock type 0.0257 Automation level by inventory transaction type 0.0257 Automation level by stock place type 0.0257 ATP support level 0.0257 Barcode and RF processing capability level 0.0257 Load level management automation level 0.0257 Physical Inventory Movement Management Automation Level 0.0257 Material Receipt and Stock Information Online Display Level 0.0257 Trace level of the product-pallet unit 0.0514 Trace level of the product-in units of boxes 0.0447 Trace Level of Product-Lot Units 0.0447 Automated material / part / goods receipt and inspection process 0.0385 Quantitative Control of Inventory Costs 0.0190 Related department system linkage level for inventory management activities 0.0385 Level of inventory management by supplier 0.0257

QA diagnostic index items weight Quality Management Organization and System Level 0.0571 Level of utilization of QC tools by workers 0.0500 Quality inspection standard regulation level 0.0429 Quality control activity level 0.0571 Nonconforming Product Evaluation and Management System Level 0.0429 Level of implementation of soreness technology-Six sigma 0.0429 Level of implementation of soreness-related technologies-tqm 0.0429 Level of implementation of soreness-related technologies-continuous improvement program 0.0429 Level of implementation of technology related to soreness-defect tracking 0.0500 Level of implementation of sorrow-related technologies-statistical process management (SPC) 0.0500 Acquisition level of domestic and international quality certification system (ISO 9000, etc.) 0.0571 How to Perform Process Monitoring and Control 0.0571 Real time inquiry level of process quality information 0.0571 Range of process quality information managed by the system 0.0429 Flexible quality data collection level in process and product changes 0.0500 Failure Cause Analysis Statistical Technique Use Level 0.0429 Cause of defect tracking and analysis automation 0.0571 Classification and Management Types of Quality Costs 0.0429 Quality cost measurement automation level 0.0286 Related department level for quality management activities 0.0429 Related department system linkage level for quality control activities 0.0429

Reliability Diagnostic Index Items weight Production Plan Achievement Index Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.1481 Material Requirements Estimation Accuracy Indicator Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.1111 Procurement delivery deadline compliance level measurement level and performance level 0.1111 Supply Defect Rate Indicator Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.1111 Production schedule compliance rate measurement level and performance level 0.0926 Productivity (Yield) Indicator Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.0926 Inventory error rate indicator measurement level and performance level 0.0926 Leakage rate indicator Measured level and performance level 0.0926 Defective indicator measurement level and performance level 0.1481

Responsiveness Diagnostic Index Items weight Production Plan Lead Time Indicator Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.2500 Material Procurement Lead Time Indicator Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.2500 Production Lead Time Indicator Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.2500 Throughput Rate Indicator Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.2500

Flexibility Diagnostics Index Item weight Production Plan Change Rate Indicator Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.5000 Average Job Readiness Indicators Measured Levels and Performance Levels 0.5000

Cost Diagnostic Indicator Item weight Total production cost indicator measurement level and performance level 0.0955 Material inventory turnover indicator measurement level and performance level 0.1909 Average Daily Stock Indicator Measurement Levels and Performance Levels 0.1909 Average fair stock indicator measurement level and performance level 0.1659 Obsolescence Inventory Ratio Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.0955 Inventory cost indicator measurement level and performance level 0.1182 Quality Assurance Cost Indicator Measurement Level and Performance Level 0.1432

Resource utilization diagnostic index item weight Production line utilization rate measurement level and performance level 0.2222 Recovery level measurement level and performance level 0.1389 Loss rate indicator measurement level and performance level 0.2222 Worker efficiency indicator measurement level and performance level 0.1389 Weekly Overtime Indicator Measurement Levels and Performance Levels 0.1111 Facility efficiency level measurement level and performance level 0.1667

[Table 421] to [Table 426] is a weight of processing the results of the AHP survey for the subordinate subordinate constituting the diagnosis group.

domain Subdiagnostic group weight Manufacturing strategy Manufacturing strategy 0.2526 Manufacturing Strategy 0.4819 Manufacturing Strategy Performance Management 0.2655

domain Subdiagnostic group weight Organization Manufacturing Organizational Structure and Culture 0.3304 Manpower Mind 0.4018

domain Subdiagnostic group weight Manufacturing IT Manufacturing IT Organizations and Capabilities 0.3023 Manufacturing IT Infra 0.2534 Manufacturing IT Application 0.4443

domain Subdiagnostic group weight Manufacturing process Production planning process 0.2275 Material Procurement Process 0.1082 Production process 0.2573 Facility operation process 0.1443

domain Subdiagnostic group weight Manufacturing performance responsibility 0.23766836 Reactivity 0.292273793 flexibility 0.109046548 cost 0.222944006 Resource utilization 0.138067293

Table 426 below is a weight of processing AHP survey results for the five diagnostic groups of manufacturing processes constituting the diagnostic group.

5 levels of manufacturing process strategy 0.1839 group 0.1199 IT 0.2486 Process 0.2779 result 0.1697

The diagnosis subject includes a diagnosis group for the manufacturing strategy diagnosis component, a diagnosis group for the manufacturing tissue diagnosis component, a diagnosis group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component, a diagnosis group for the manufacturing process diagnostic component, and the manufacture The diagnostic index input value for the diagnostic indicators of Tables 1 to 400 is received for information on the diagnostic group for the performance diagnostic component. The following evaluation information is generated as a weight for the diagnosis group included in Tables 401 to 426 and at least one lower diagnosis group.

Tables 427 to 429 show examples of such evaluation indicator input values and weighted evaluation information for each of the sub-diagnostic groups of manufacturing strategy establishment, manufacturing strategy promotion, and manufacturing strategy performance management.

Diagnostic Indicator ID a01 a021 a022 a023 a024 a03 a04 Manufacturing strategy Diagnostic indicators

Diagnostic subject ID Enterprise manufacturing strategy establishment level Linkage with company-wide management strategy Link to Supply Chain Strategy Link with customer management strategy Link with Information Strategy Level of detailed strategy establishment Systematic level of manufacturing strategy establishment process One 7 7 7 7 7 10 10 75.6087 2 7 10 10 10 10 4 10 88.7304 3 7 4 4 7 0 7 8 51.5043 4 7 4 7 7 2 7 8 58.7652 5 7 4 4 4 4 10 4 51.2696 6 4 7 7 0 0 10 8 46.8261 7 7 4 4 7 4 2 10 55.2087 8 2 2 2 7 7 4 4 38.3478 9 7 4 4 4 4 10 8 55.4087 10 2 4 7 4 4 7 8 46.8261

Diagnostic Indicator ID a05 a06 a07 Manufacturing Strategy Diagnostic indicators

Diagnostic subject ID Derivation level of detailed task for manufacturing strategy Priority selection and evaluation of detailed implementation tasks for manufacturing strategy Level of detailed task for manufacturing strategy One 0 8 7 53.8889 2 0 8 10 65.5556 3 0 6 2 27.7778 4 0 4 7 40.5556 5 0 8 10 65.5556 6 0 8 7 53.8889 7 10 4 4 56.6667 8 0 8 7 53.8889 9 0 10 2 41.1111 10 10 8 10 93.3333

Diagnostic Indicator ID a08 a09 a10 a11 a12 Manufacturing Strategy Performance Management Diagnostic indicators

Diagnostic subject ID Manufacturing strategy performance evaluation system establishment and execution level Level of goal setting to achieve manufacturing strategy Definition of Manufacturing Strategy Performance Measure Index and Performance Management Level Manufacturing Strategy Performance Evaluation Result Monitoring Level Manufacturing Strategy Performance Evaluation Feedback Level One 7 8 4 7 7 53.9890 2 10 6 10 10 10 89.3770 3 7 6 4 4 10 59.1055 4 7 2 4 10 10 68.9532 5 10 6 7 10 10 87.2142 6 7 4 0 0 10 48.6676 7 4 4 4 4 7 47.1841 8 7 6 4 7 7 62.8901 9 7 6 2 4 10 61.0702 10 7 0 0 4 7 41.2500 7 2 7 10 7 64.9081

Table 430 below shows evaluation information for the manufacturing strategy.

Diagnostic group subject ID Manufacturing strategy One 59.4024 2 77.7339 3 42.0882 4 52.6944 5 67.6962 6 50.7186 7 53.7810 8 52.3524 9 50.0215 10 67.7580 61.8436

The manufacturing diagnosis system of the present invention is a diagnostic group for manufacturing strategy components, a diagnostic group for manufacturing tissue components, a diagnostic group for manufacturing IT components, a diagnostic group for manufacturing process components, as illustrated in FIG. 12. Transmitting a diagnosis group for the manufacturing performance component (S11), a diagnosis group for the manufacturing strategy component, a diagnosis group for the manufacturing tissue component, a diagnosis group for the manufacturing IT component, and a diagnosis for the manufacturing process component. Obtain diagnostic input information on the diagnosis group for the group and manufacturing performance components (S12) .The diagnosis input information and evaluation criteria policy information are used to diagnose the diagnosis in five perspectives: manufacturing strategy, manufacturing organization, manufacturing IT, manufacturing process, and manufacturing performance. The level of the manufacturing process of the subject is evaluated (S13).

The present invention is applicable to various service industries and the manufacturing industry itself for supporting the manufacturing industry.

1000: Manufacturing Diagnostic System
1100: Manufacturing Diagnostic Engine
1110: manufacturing diagnostic group transmission unit
1120: diagnostic input information acquisition unit
1130: manufacturing process level evaluation engine
1200: manufacturing group diagnosis group DB
1210: Manufacturing Strategy Diagnostic Group DB
1210: Manufacturing Strategy Diagnostic Group DB
1211: manufacturing strategy establishment diagnostic group data
1212: Manufacturing Strategy Promotion Diagnostic Group Data
1213: Manufacturing Strategy Performance Management Diagnostic Group Data
1220: manufacturing tissue diagnostic group DB
1221: Manufacturing tissue structure and culture diagnostic data
1222: Manufacturing personnel mind diagnosis group data
1223: Manufacturing Personnel Knowledge and Skill Diagnosis Data
1230: Manufacturing IT diagnostic group DB
1230: Manufacturing IT diagnostic group DB
1231: Manufacturing IT Competency Diagnostic Data
1232: Manufacturing IT Infrastructure Diagnostic Group Data
1233: Manufacturing IT Application Diagnostic Group Data
1240: manufacturing process diagnostic group DB
1241: Production plan diagnostic group data
1242: Material Procurement Diagnostic Data
1243: Production process diagnostic group data
1244: Diagnostic data of facility operation
1245: Inventory control diagnostic data
1246: Quality control diagnostic data
1250: Manufacturing performance diagnosis group DB
1251: Reliability diagnostic group data
1252: Reactive diagnostic group data
1253: flexibility diagnostic data
1254: Cost Diagnostic Group Data
1255: resource effect diagnosis group data
1300: Manufacturing Process Maturity Assessment DB
1310: Manufacturing Strategy Maturity Level Evaluation DB
1320: Manufacturing tissue maturity level evaluation DB
1330: Manufacturing IT maturity level assessment DB
1340: Manufacturing Process Maturity Assessment DB
1350: Manufacturing performance maturity level evaluation DB
1400: User Management
1410: DB for diagnosis input by user
1420: Evaluation of manufacturing process level by user
2210: Manufacturing Strategy Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy DB
2211: Manufacturing Strategy Establishment Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy Data
2212: Manufacturing Strategy Promotion Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy Data
2213: Manufacturing Strategy Performance Management Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy Data
2220: Manufacturing Organization Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy DB
2221: Manufacturing Organizational Structure and Culture Diagnostic Assessment Weighting Policy Data
2222: Manufacturing personnel mind diagnostic assessment weighting policy data
2223: Manufacturing Personnel Knowledge and Skill Diagnostic Assessment Weighting Policy Data
2230: Manufacturing IT Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy DB
2231: Manufacturing IT Competency Assessment Assessment Weighting Policy Data
2232: Manufacturing IT Infrastructure Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy Data
2233: Manufacturing IT Application Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy Data
2240: manufacturing process diagnostic evaluation weighting policy DB
2241: Production Plan Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy Data
2242: Material Procurement Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy Data
2243: Production Process Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy Data
2244: facility operation diagnostic evaluation weighting policy data
2245: Inventory Management diagnostic evaluation weighting policy data
2246: Quality Control Diagnostic Evaluation Weighting Policy Data
2250: Manufacturing Performance Assessment Evaluation Weighting Policy DB
2251: Reliability Diagnostic Assessment Weighting Policy Data
2252: Responsiveness Diagnostic Assessment Weighting Policy Data
2253: Flexibility Diagnostic Assessment Weighting Policy Data
2254: Cost Diagnostic Assessment Weighting Policy Data
2255: resource effect diagnosis evaluation weighting policy data
4000: wired and wireless network
5000: User Computer

Claims (14)

In the information processing method of the manufacturing diagnostic system, the manufacturing diagnostic system
A diagnostic group for at least one submanufacturing strategy diagnostic component corresponding to a manufacturing strategy, a diagnostic group for at least one submanufacturing tissue diagnostic component corresponding to a manufacturing tissue, at least one submanufacturing IT diagnostic corresponding to a manufacturing IT At least one diagnostic group for a component, at least one diagnostic group for at least one sub-manufacturing process diagnostic component corresponding to the manufacturing process, and at least one diagnostic group for at least one sub-manufacturing performance diagnostic component corresponding to manufacturing performance. Transmitting to the diagnostic inputter computer for diagnosing the above diagnostic subject;
A diagnostic group for the manufacturing strategy diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing tissue diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing process diagnostic component, from the computer of the diagnostic inputter, Receiving diagnostic input information of the diagnosis subject for the diagnosis group for the manufacturing performance diagnosis component; And
The received diagnostic input information is stored, and at least one of the diagnostic group, at least one lower diagnostic group constituting the diagnostic group, and at least one diagnostic index constituting the lower diagnostic group with respect to the diagnostic input information. Generating evaluation information on the level of the manufacturing process of the diagnosis subject from five viewpoints of the manufacturing strategy, the manufacturing organization, the manufacturing IT, the manufacturing process, and the manufacturing performance with reference to evaluation criteria policy information corresponding to. ;;
The diagnostic group for the manufacturing performance diagnostic component includes a detailed evaluation region and evaluation contents composed of at least one of reliability, responsiveness, flexibility, cost, and resource effects. . The method of claim 1,
The diagnostic group for the manufacturing strategy diagnosis component is a method of establishing and promoting a manufacturing strategy and systematic management of the manufacturing strategy performance so that the manufacturing organization, manufacturing IT, and manufacturing process can be strategically converged and expressed as manufacturing performance. An information processing method of a manufacturing diagnostic system, characterized in that it comprises a detailed evaluation area and the evaluation contents for the diagnosis of one or more. The method of claim 2,
The diagnostic group for the manufacturing strategy diagnosis component includes a detailed evaluation area and evaluation contents composed of any one or more of manufacturing strategy establishment, manufacturing strategy promotion, and manufacturing strategy performance management. Treatment method. The method of claim 1,
The diagnostic group for the manufacturing tissue diagnosis component includes detailed evaluation areas and contents for diagnosing any one or more of the organizational structure and culture, the mindset of the manufacturing personnel, and the level of capability management of the manufacturing organization, which is the subject of improvement and innovation in the manufacturing process. Information processing method of manufacturing diagnostic system, characterized in that it comprises. 5. The method of claim 4,
The diagnosis group for the manufacturing tissue diagnosis component includes a manufacturing evaluation structure and a detailed evaluation area including one or more of manufacturing organization structure and culture, manufacturing personnel mind, manufacturing personnel knowledge and skills, and evaluation contents. How the system processes information. The method of claim 1,
The diagnostic group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component includes detailed evaluation areas and contents for diagnosing at least one of the level of the IT technology itself and the level of the IT organization, such as the IT infrastructure and applications that support the improvement and innovation of the manufacturing process. The information processing method of the manufacturing diagnostic system characterized by the above-mentioned. The method according to claim 6,
The diagnostic group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component includes a detailed evaluation area composed of at least one of manufacturing IT capability, manufacturing IT infrastructure, and manufacturing IT application, and evaluation contents. Way. The method of claim 1,
The diagnostic group for the manufacturing process diagnostic component includes a detailed evaluation area and contents for diagnosing any one or more levels of improvement and innovation of the manufacturing process itself, which is a combination of manufacturing organization resources and manufacturing IT resources. The information processing method of the manufacturing diagnostic system. The method of claim 1,
Diagnosis group for the manufacturing process diagnostic component is characterized in that it comprises a detailed evaluation area and evaluation content composed of any one or more of production planning, material procurement, production process, equipment operation, inventory management, quality control Method of processing information in manufacturing diagnostic system. delete delete The method of claim 1,
A diagnostic group for the manufacturing strategy diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing tissue diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing IT diagnostic component, a diagnostic group for the manufacturing process diagnostic component, the manufacturing performance diagnostic component In the diagnostic group for,
The diagnostic group has at least two lower diagnostic groups or two or more diagnostic indicator items, and the lower diagnostic group or the diagnostic indicator items may have different weights.
And said weight is reflected in said evaluation. 13. The method of claim 12,
Wherein the weight is determined by applying the AHP method. A manufacturing diagnostic system comprising the method of any one of claims 1 to 9 and 12 to 13.

Images