KR100716747B1 - Technical Cooperation Type Selection System - Google Patents

Abstract

A system for selecting a technology cooperation type for parts and materials requiring technical cooperation is disclosed. Based on the market & industry capability evaluation data and R & D capability evaluation data for a plurality of parts materials, the parts materials are classified into investment promotion type and technology introduction type. Component materials classified as investment type are classified into R & D center and green field type in consideration of R & D capability evaluation data and market size. Component materials classified as technology introduction type are classified into joint research and development type and technology introduction type based on technology capacity evaluation data and R & D capacity evaluation results. Accordingly, by positioning the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability for each part material, R & D center type, green field type, joint R & D type, or technology introduction can be applied to the types of technical cooperation corresponding to the parts material. You can choose whether to proceed with the sentence.

Technical cooperation, positioning, R & D, investment attraction, technology introduction

Description

SYSTEM OF SELECTING A TECHNICAL COOPERATION TYPE}

1 is a block diagram illustrating a technology cooperation type selection system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a technical cooperation type selection unit illustrated in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram of selecting technology-introduced component materials and investment-induced component materials by positioning market & industrial capability and R & D capability data shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a conceptual diagram of selecting a jointly developed part material and a transferable part material by positioning the technology capability and R & D capability data shown in FIG. 2.

5 is a conceptual diagram illustrating a technology cooperation type procedure selected according to the present invention.

6 is a flowchart illustrating a method for selecting a technology cooperation type according to the present invention.

7A to 7E are diagrams for explaining an example of a technology cooperation type selection questionnaire.

8 is a table for explaining an example of the ratings corresponding to each of the business & industry capability, R & D capability and technical capability for each component material according to the present invention.

9 is a flowchart for explaining step S500 shown in FIG. 6 in more detail.

10 is a flowchart for explaining step S510 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail.

FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of investment-induced and technology-induced part materials positioned by FIG. 10.

12 is a flowchart for explaining step S520 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail.

FIG. 13 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of R & D center type and greenfield part materials positioned by FIG.

14 is a flowchart for explaining step S530 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail.

FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of joint R & D and technology transfer part materials positioned by FIG. 14.

<Description of the symbols for the main parts of the drawings>

100: request for selection of technology cooperation type 200: request for selection of technology cooperation type

300: expert system part 400: related company system part

210: evaluation data storage unit 220: positioning unit

230: Technical cooperation type extraction unit

212: Market & Industry Capacity Assessment Data Storage

214: R & D capability evaluation data storage

216: Technical competency evaluation data storage

222: Market & Industry Competency, R & D Competency and Technology Competency Positioning Module

224: Market & industry competency and R & D competency positioning module

226: Technology competency and R & D competency positioning module

The present invention relates to a technical cooperation type selection system, and more particularly, to a technical cooperation type selection system of parts materials requiring technical cooperation.

In general, technical cooperation is a series of inter-organizational activities in which companies share complementary technology know-how and resources with other external organizations for technological innovation. The types of technical cooperation can be classified into domestic technical cooperation versus international technical cooperation, intergovernmental technical cooperation versus private technical cooperation, and bilateral technical cooperation versus multilateral technical cooperation.

The above-mentioned technical cooperation can benefit from the government's support policies to supplement the limited capacity and resources held by the enterprise, to reduce the cost of technology acquisition, to secure the size of the workforce to conduct research properly, and to promote business cooperation. It is done to enjoy.

Therefore, the technical problem of the present invention has been made in view of this point, the object of the present invention is the technical cooperation of the parts materials on the basis of market & industry capabilities, R & D capabilities and technical capabilities for each of the parts materials requiring technical cooperation It is to provide a type selection system.

delete

In order to realize the above object of the present invention, a technology cooperation type selection system according to an embodiment includes an evaluation data storage unit, a positioning unit, and a technology cooperation type extraction unit. The evaluation data storage unit stores market & industry capability evaluation data, R & D capability evaluation data, and technology capability evaluation data corresponding to a plurality of component materials obtained from questionnaires, technical market information, and statistical data. The positioning unit positions at least two evaluation data of market & industry, R & D, and technical capability evaluation data stored in the storage unit on an X-Y plane. The technical cooperation type extracting unit classifies each of the technology introduction or investment-type parts based on the evaluation data positioned on the XY plane by the positioning unit, and the positioning among the parts materials classified as the investment-induced types. Extracts the R & D center type and green field type parts classified in consideration of the market size and the R & D capability evaluation data positioned on the XY plane by the part, and the positioning part among the part materials classified as the technology introduction type. The joint R & D and technology-introduced component materials are extracted in consideration of the technical capability evaluation data and R & D capability evaluation data positioned on the XY plane.

delete

delete

delete

delete

delete

delete

delete

delete

delete

delete

In one example, the positioning unit includes a first positioning module, a second positioning module and a third positioning module. The first positioning module positions the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technical capability evaluation data on a coordinate plane. The second positioning module positions the market & industry capability and R & D capability assessment data on a coordinate plane. The third positioning module positions the technical capability and R & D capability evaluation data on a coordinate plane. At this time, the technical cooperation type extracting unit extracts the parts materials positioned in the relatively high market & industrial capability area among the parts materials positioned by the first positioning module as investment-induced parts materials, and relatively low start & Parts materials positioned in the industrial competence area are extracted as technology-introduced parts materials.

According to this type of technology cooperation system, the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability are positioned for each component material included in the questionnaire. You can choose whether to proceed to R & D center type, green field type, joint R & D type, or technology introduction type.

Hereinafter, with reference to the accompanying drawings, it will be described in detail the present invention.

1 is a block diagram illustrating a technology cooperation type selection system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to Figure 1, the technical cooperation type selection system according to an embodiment of the present invention is a technical cooperation type selection request unit 100, technical cooperation type selection unit 200, expert system unit 300, technical market information DB 400 and related enterprise system unit 500.

The technical cooperation type selection requesting unit 100 provides the technical cooperation type selection part material list to the technical cooperation type selection unit 200, and in response, the technical cooperation of each of the technical cooperation type selection target materials. Type is provided.

In the present embodiment, for convenience of description, 37 parts materials will be described below as part materials for selecting technology cooperation types.

The target parts and materials for selecting the type of technical cooperation can be determined by various standards and methods according to the purpose and purpose of technical cooperation. For example, it can be determined in various ways according to its purpose, such as 100 core parts and materials for each of the 10 next-generation growth engines and 50 medium-term parts for medium-term development to improve trade with Japan through improving technological competitiveness. The selection of parts and materials to be selected for this type of technology cooperation is generally decided based on the quantitative information analyzed based on technology and market information and the qualitative analysis results by experts in each field. It is okay. In this example, the top 100 parts materials are imported from the items registered in the import statistics database of the Korea Customs Service, and then analyzed by the expert committee for the cause of import, domestic and foreign import and export companies, import scale, technology level, etc. The selected parts and materials were selected for the cooperation type.

The technical cooperation type selection unit 200 prepares an evaluation questionnaire including an evaluation item for evaluating the selected target component material and provides it to the expert system unit 300. The questionnaire constitutes an evaluation item suitable for the purpose of selecting a cooperation type, and in this embodiment, a questionnaire is prepared by reflecting technology, R & D, manpower, market, industry, domestic capability, technology level, and ripple effect.

The expert system 300 writes an evaluation opinion on the questionnaire by using various kinds of information stored in the technical market information DB 400 and provides the technical cooperation type selection unit 200. Evaluation of the questionnaire in the expert system unit 300 may be evaluated by experts selected by the target parts and materials connected to the expert system unit 300 through a network, or by using an e-mail system. . Alternatively, the evaluations in writing can be collected separately and entered into the system.

The technical cooperation type selection unit 200 scores the target parts and materials by using the result data of the questionnaire evaluated by the expert system unit 300 and analyzes them again to select types of technical cooperation, and then the technical cooperation. The type selection request unit 100 is provided.

The selected types of technology cooperation include greenfield type and R & D center type as investment promotion type, and joint R & D type and technology transfer type as examples of technology introduction type. The green field type is, for example, a type of technical cooperation such as plant attraction. The R & D center type is a type of technical cooperation that can be achieved by maintaining an R & D center without attracting factories. The joint R & D type is a type of technical cooperation for conducting joint research with foreign companies with a high level of technology. The technology transfer type is a type of technology cooperation in which a technology possessed by a high-level foreign company is transferred to develop and secure the technology on its own.

In FIG. 1, the technical cooperation type selection request unit 100 selects 37 technical cooperation target parts and then provides the selected component material list to the technical cooperation type selection unit 200. The selection of the parts and materials list may be performed by the technical cooperation type selection unit 200.

As the questionnaire created by the technical cooperation type selection unit 200 is provided, the expert system unit 300 fills in predetermined answers in the blanks included in the questionnaire, and the written questionnaire forms the technical cooperation type selection unit ( 200).

The technical market information DB 400 stores technical information and market information of each component and various statistical data corresponding thereto, and the technical cooperation type selection requesting unit 100, the technical cooperation type selecting unit 200, or the like. The information is provided at the request of the expert system unit 300. The technical information includes technical manpower information of a manufacturer who manufactures each component, technical trend prospective information corresponding to each component, and technical classification information of each component. The technical classification information includes competition technology information of each component material, alternative technology information of each component material, and the like. The market information includes domestic and international market size information of each parts, main producers of each parts, information on the market share of each parts, supply and demand relations of components of each parts, and cost structure information of each parts. Include.

The relevant enterprise system unit 500 is provided with the technical cooperation type data for a specific component material provided by the technical cooperation type selection request unit 100. Accordingly, the operator side proceeds to the green field type, R & D center type, joint research and development type, technology transfer type, etc., based on the corresponding technical cooperation type data. The technical cooperation strategy of specific parts and materials will be established.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a technology cooperation type selection unit illustrated in FIG. 1. FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram of selecting technology-driven component materials and investment-induced component materials by positioning the market & industry capability and R & D capability data shown in FIG. 2. FIG. 4 is a conceptual diagram of selecting a jointly developed part material and a transferable part material by positioning the technology capability and R & D capability data shown in FIG. 2.

Referring to FIG. 2, the technical cooperation type selection unit 200 according to an embodiment of the present invention includes an evaluation data storage unit 210, a positioning unit 220, and a technical cooperation type extraction unit 230.

The evaluation data storage unit 210 includes a market & industry capability evaluation data storage unit 212, an R & D capability evaluation data storage unit 214, and a technology capability evaluation data storage unit 216, and evaluation result data of a questionnaire. Score it.

Specifically, the market & industry capability evaluation data storage unit 212 includes the import scale of the corresponding component material, the use of the component material, the national competitiveness of the applied product of the component material, regulatory or obstacles, the domestic market growth potential and raw material supply system. , And assessment data corresponding to domestic competence are scored and stored. In the process of scoring, the evaluation data for some items may not be scored. In this case, the results of the evaluation items are difficult to quantify by score, there is a possibility of overlap in scoring, or the results of a particular evaluation item are supported. For example, or in cases that are not related to the evaluation. This is because when the evaluation questionnaire is prepared in order to increase the reliability of the evaluation result, more items than the items to be actually used are reflected in the questionnaire.

There are various methods of scoring the evaluation result data, such as 5-point scale, 7-point scale, upper and lower, excellent (good) -normal-low (not good), but in the present embodiment + 1, 0 for normal, -1 for lower or less than normal levels. These scoring criteria are applied to both R & D competency evaluation and technology competency evaluation.

The R & D capability evaluation data storage unit 214 stores evaluation data corresponding to the degree of possession of skilled workers, the supply of skilled workers, related personnel, and R & D infrastructure.

The technical capability evaluation data storage unit 216 stores evaluation data corresponding to the level of domestic technology possessed, technology gap with developed countries, core technology possessed, insufficient technology, and technology ripple effect.

The positioning unit 220 includes a market & industry capability, R & D capability and technology capability positioning module 222, a market & industry capability and R & D capability positioning module 224, and a technology capability and R & D capability positioning module 226, Using the scores stored in the evaluation data storage unit 210 is positioned on the coordinate for each component material to be selected for technical cooperation type.

Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3, the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability positioning module 222 sets the X and Y axes as the market & industry capability evaluation score and the R & D capability evaluation score, respectively. Position the result on XY coordinates.

In the present embodiment, when the discrimination ability is low, such as the case where the technical capability is generally estimated to be low in consideration of the possession of core technology and the technology gap compared to the developed countries, it is not applied to the classification of investment type and technology introduction type. In this regard, it is used as a criterion to distinguish the cases of joint R & D and technology transfer among technology-induced parts and materials.

The market & industry competency evaluation score is calculated by averaging each of the scores for domestic industrial competitiveness, parts and materials related regulations and obstacles, domestic market's growth potential, and raw material supply and demand capability items included in the questionnaire. The average of the scores may be weighted average or arithmetic average, but the same criteria as the evaluation of other competencies such as R & D competency or technical competency should be applied. The R & D capability evaluation data is calculated by averaging scores of the degree of possession and supply of skilled workers included in the questionnaire, the degree of manpower related to the parts and materials, and items of the R & D infrastructure. The technical competency evaluation data is calculated by averaging scores of items of skill level, technology gap, and possessed skills compared to developed countries included in the questionnaire.

As shown in FIG. 3, the market & industry capability and R & D capability positioning module 224 sets the X and Y axes as the market & industry capability evaluation score and the R & D capability evaluation score, respectively, and sets the result on XY coordinates. Position.

As shown in FIG. 4, the technical capability and R & D capability positioning module 226 sets the X and Y axes as the technical capability evaluation data and the R & D capability evaluation data, respectively, and positions the result on the X-Y coordinate.

The technology cooperation type extraction unit 230 is a technology introduction type extraction unit 231, investment attraction type extraction unit 232, R & D center type extraction unit 233, green field extraction unit 234, joint R & D extraction unit 235 and the technology transfer extraction unit 236.

Specifically, the technology introduction type extractor 231 has a component material having a relatively low market & industry evaluation score on the XY coordinates positioned by the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability positioning module 222. Component materials corresponding to the positioned region are extracted and classified as technology-introduced component materials. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, component materials positioned on the second and third quadrants of the X-Y coordinate are classified as technology-introduced component materials.

The investment attraction extracting unit 232 is located in an area where a component material having a relatively high market & industry evaluation score is positioned on an XY coordinate positioned by the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability positioning module 222. Corresponding component materials are extracted and classified as investment-induced component materials. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the component materials positioned on the first and fourth quadrants of the X-Y coordinates are classified as investment-induced component materials.

The R & D center type extractor 233 has a relatively high market & industrial evaluation score position and a relatively high R & D evaluation score position on the XY coordinates positioned by the market & industry capability and R & D capability positioning module 224. Parts materials corresponding to the positioned area are extracted and classified into R & D center type parts materials. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the component materials positioned on the first quadrant of the X-Y coordinate are classified as R & D center component materials.

The green field extractor 234 extracts the parts and materials corresponding to the region where the relatively low R & D evaluation score is positioned on the XY coordinates positioned by the market & industrial capability and R & D capability positioning module 224. Classified as a part material. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the component materials positioned on the quadrant of the X-Y coordinates are classified as greenfield component materials.

The joint R & D extraction unit 235 extracts the parts and materials corresponding to the region where the relatively low technical competency evaluation score is positioned on the XY coordinates positioned by the technical capability and R & D capability positioning module 226. Classified as a part material. That is, as shown in FIG. 4, the component materials positioned on the second and third quadrants of the X-Y coordinates are classified as joint R & D component materials.

The technology transfer type extractor 236 extracts parts and materials corresponding to an area where a relatively high technology competency evaluation score is positioned on the XY coordinates positioned by the technology capability and R & D capability positioning module 226. Classified as a part material. That is, as shown in FIG. 4, the component materials positioned on the first and fourth quadrants of the X-Y coordinates are classified as technology transferable component materials.

The procedure of selecting the type of technical cooperation described above will be briefly described with reference to FIG. 5.

5 is a conceptual diagram illustrating a technology cooperation type procedure selected according to the present invention.

Referring to Figure 5, for example, in determining the type of technical cooperation based on the results of the question for each of the 37 component materials, each of the 36 component materials, each of the investment-induced components and technology-introduced components Classify primarily into materials.

Subsequently, each of the investment-induced component materials classified firstly is classified into green-field component materials and R & D center component materials. In parallel with this, each of the technology-introduced component materials classified as primary is again classified into joint R & D component materials and technology transfer component materials.

The investment-induced parts and materials are parts and materials that have a competitive edge in R & D or market while the domestic industry related to the parts and materials has a market competitiveness.

The distinction between the R & D center type and the green field type is preferably determined in consideration of the R & D capability such as skilled R & D personnel and infrastructure, the competitiveness of the domestic industry and market related to the application of parts and materials, and the market (import) scale. . In addition, it may be determined by taking into account other environmental factors such as regulations and laws.

For example, relatively high R & D capacities are categorized as investment attraction in the form of R & D centers (R & D capacities representing assessments of skilled personnel and related infrastructure are important factors in determining whether to attract R & D centers). On the other hand, relatively low R & D capacity is classified as attracting greenfield investment.

If the market size (import) of parts materials classified as green field type is less than a certain level, it is desirable to exclude them from investment promotion type. This is because, in the case of the green field type, if the relevant market size is below a certain level, it is difficult to expect the profitability of the business.

On the other hand, the technology-introduced component materials are parts materials in which it is difficult to secure technology with only domestic capabilities in a short period of time due to lack of original technology and weak technology base, and these include material materials other than investment promotion type.

Since the joint R & D type has no technical skills at all, it is difficult to access the technology with its own capabilities, and thus it can be said to be a type of technical cooperation under the premise of securing technology through joint R & D with technology holders. In other words, this type of cooperation is a situation where it is difficult to expect to secure technology through technology development because there is no technology possessed, whether core or peripheral technology.

The pure technology transfer type may be applied to the case where the technology can be secured based on the existing technology if only the technology is provided because it possesses some technical capabilities, although not at a high level with respect to the corresponding component material. For example, they may have some competing technologies or some technical capabilities but no core technical competencies.

Through this series of processes, we finally select the type of technical cooperation for each of the 37 parts and materials.

In this case, if the discrimination is evaluated as low as overall, considering the technology capability evaluation result, considering the possession of core technology and technology gap compared to developed countries, it is not applicable to the classification of investment type and technology introduction type. Instead, it is used as a criterion for distinguishing cases of joint R & D and technology transfer among technology-introduced tasks.

6 is a flowchart illustrating a method for selecting a technology cooperation type according to the present invention. 7A to 7E are diagrams for explaining an example of the technology cooperation type selection questionnaire shown in FIG. 6. 8 is a table for explaining an example of the ratings corresponding to each of the business & industry capability, R & D capability and technical capability for each component material according to the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 6, a questionnaire including market & industrial capability, R & D capability, and technology capability is performed by conducting prior studies related to foreign investment and technology cooperation as basic data for preparing a questionnaire for selecting a technology cooperation type. 7E.) (Step S100).

For example, as a preliminary study for creating a questionnaire, research and analysis of domestic and international data related to foreign investment attraction, technology acquisition, and technical cooperation are carried out to identify key evaluation items necessary for the selection of technology cooperation and to write a questionnaire. Can conduct prior research. The preceding studies include investment maintenance related prior studies, technology selection related prior studies, and the like.

In addition, based on the study of domestic and foreign priorities related to foreign investment and technical cooperation, a questionnaire for selecting the type of technical cooperation is prepared centering on items such as market & industry, R & D, and technology capability.

Subsequently, the questionnaire created in step S100 is provided to the expert or expert group (step S200).

Then, it is checked whether the questionnaire written from the experts or expert groups is received (step S300), and as the questionnaire written from the experts or expert groups is received, the questionnaire for the pre-selected parts and materials is evaluated ( Step S400). In particular, pre-selected parts and materials can be evaluated on their own, or questionnaires can be evaluated using a second expert or group of experts.

For example, in the step S400, business & industry capability evaluation data, R & D capability evaluation data, and technology capability evaluation data for each component material are shown in FIG. 8.

Subsequently, an analysis is performed based on the questionnaire evaluation result to position the capability of each component and classify the type of technical cooperation based on the capability of the positioned material component (step S500). The above-mentioned types of technology cooperation can be classified as investment promotion type such as green field type or R & D center type, or can be classified as technology introduction type such as joint R & D type or technology transfer type.

9 is a flowchart for explaining step S500 shown in FIG. 6 in more detail.

Referring to Figure 9, based on the market & industry and R & D capability evaluation data is classified into investment-induced component materials and technology-introduced component materials (step S510).

Subsequently, the component materials classified as investment-induced type are classified into R & D center type component materials and green field type component materials, respectively (step S520).

Subsequently, the component materials classified as technology introduction types are classified into joint R & D component materials and technology introduction component materials, respectively (step S530).

10 is a flowchart for explaining step S510 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail. FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of investment-induced and technology-induced part materials positioned by FIG. 10.

10 and 11, following step S400, a rating (or evaluation data) corresponding to the market & industry capability and a rating corresponding to the R & D capability are respectively positioned on the X coordinate and the Y coordinate (step S511). For example, if the ratings of the 37 component materials are positioned on the X-Y coordinates based on the market & industrial capability and R & D capability, they are shown in FIG. 11.

In step S511, it is checked whether there are component materials positioned on the positive X coordinate positioned (step S512). If there are component materials positioned on the positive X coordinate in step S512, the corresponding component materials are classified as investment-induced component materials (step S513).

When there are no component materials positioned on the positive X coordinate in step S512 and after step S513, it is checked whether or not there are component materials positioned on the negative X coordinate (step S514). If there are component materials positioned on the negative X coordinate in step S514, the corresponding component materials are classified into technology-introduced component materials (step S515), and the feedback is returned to step S520.

Through this process, 19 parts and materials with medium and higher business and industry ratings are classified as investment-induced parts and 18 parts and materials with median and lower are classified as technology-induced parts and materials.

12 is a flowchart for explaining step S520 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail. FIG. 13 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of R & D center type and greenfield part materials positioned by FIG.

12 and 13, it is checked whether the parts are positioned on a relatively large Y coordinate (step S521), and when the parts are checked to be positioned on a relatively large Y coordinate, the R & D center is checked. It is classified into a type (step S522). For example, if 19 parts materials classified as investment type are classified based on R & D capability, they are positioned as shown in FIG. In the case of five parts, which have the highest R & D capability among the above 19 parts, the R & D center is the most desirable type of cooperation.

On the other hand, it is checked whether the component materials are positioned on the relatively small Y coordinate (step S523), and if it is checked that the component materials are positioned on the relatively small Y coordinate, it is classified as a green field type (step S524). ). For example, investment in greenfield-type investments is desirable for eight component materials with low R & D capabilities.

Then, it is checked whether the part materials are positioned in the middle region of the Y coordinate (step S525), and if the part materials are positioned in the middle region of the Y coordinate, it is checked whether the market size of the corresponding component material is large ( Step S526).

If it is checked in step S526 that the market size of the part material is relatively small, the part material is classified into a green field type (step S527). Meanwhile, in order to attract greenfield investment, the size of the market that is expected to be secured by investment should be premised. Therefore, out of the eight parts, four parts with small domestic imports are excluded. The four component materials excluded above are classified as technology-introduced.

If it is checked in step S526 that the market size of the component material is relatively large, the component material is classified into an R & D center type (step S528).

Through this process, 10 parts materials are classified into R & D center type and 5 parts materials into green field type.

14 is a flowchart for explaining step S530 shown in FIG. 9 in more detail. FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating an example of classification of joint R & D and technology transfer part materials positioned by FIG. 14.

14 and 15, the rating corresponding to the technical capability and the rating corresponding to the R & D capability are respectively positioned on the X-axis and the Y-axis (step S531). For example, among the 18 investment-induced types classified as the first technology-induced parts materials, the ratings of 22 parts materials plus four reclassified as technology-introduced types are given on the coordinates of the technical capacity and R & D capability as the XY axis. Positioning appears as shown in FIG. 15.

Then, it is checked whether the components are positioned in the positive X-axis region (step S532), and if it is checked that the components are positioned in the positive X-axis region, it is classified as technology transfer type (step S533). ).

Subsequently, it is checked whether the parts are positioned in the negative X-axis area (step S534), and if the parts are checked to be positioned in the negative X-axis area, it is classified as a joint development type (step S535). .

Subsequently, it is checked whether the technical capability is medium and the R & D capability is low (step S536), and if it is checked that the technical capability is medium and the R & D capability is low, it is classified as a joint development type (step S537). For example, two component materials with medium technical capability may show differences in R & D capabilities. Therefore, if the R & D capability is low, the ability to conduct R & D on its own is lower than that of the high R & D capability, so it is classified as a joint R & D component material.

Subsequently, by checking whether the technical capability is medium and the R & D capability is large (step S538), if the technical capability is medium and the R & D capability is checked as large, it is classified as technology transfer type (step S539).

Through this process, there are 13 joint R & D part materials and 9 technology transfer part materials among 22 technology introduction part materials.

As described above, in the present embodiment, the technology introduction type and the investment attraction type are first distinguished on the two-dimensional coordinate plane of XY as shown in FIGS. 3 to 5 and 9 to 15 in determining the technology cooperation type. In addition, the process of dividing the process into four types of joint R & D, technology transfer, R & D center, and green field was explained.

However, this process can also be applied on the three-dimensional coordinate plane of X-Y-Z. When applied on the above three-dimensional coordinate plane, the overall cooperative type determination process can be simplified.

As described above, according to the present invention, by positioning the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technology capability for each of the component materials included in the questionnaire, the technical cooperation type corresponding to the corresponding component materials requiring technical cooperation is required. You can choose whether to proceed to R & D center type, green field type, joint R & D type, or technology introduction type.

Although described above with reference to the embodiments, those skilled in the art can variously modify and change the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention described in the claims below. You will understand.

Claims (24)

delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete An evaluation data storage unit for storing market & industry capability evaluation data, R & D capability evaluation data, and technology capability evaluation data corresponding to a plurality of parts materials obtained from questionnaires, technical market information, and statistical data; A positioning unit for positioning at least two evaluation data of market & industry, R & D and technology capability evaluation data stored in the storage unit on an X-Y plane; And Based on the evaluation data positioned on the coordinate plane by the positioning unit is classified into technology-introduced or investment-induced component materials, respectively Extracting the R & D center type and green field type parts classified in consideration of the market size and the R & D capability evaluation data positioned on the coordinate plane by the positioning unit among the parts materials classified as the investment promotion type; A technology for extracting joint R & D and technology introduction part materials classified in consideration of the technology capability evaluation data and R & D capability evaluation data positioned on a coordinate plane by the positioning unit among the component materials classified as the technology introduction type. Technical cooperation type selection system comprising a cooperation type extraction unit. The method of claim 18, wherein the positioning unit, A first positioning module for positioning the market & industry capability, R & D capability, and technical capability evaluation data on a coordinate plane; A second positioning module for positioning the market & industry capability and R & D capability assessment data on a coordinate plane; A third positioning module for positioning the technical capability and R & D capability evaluation data on a coordinate plane; The technical cooperation type extraction unit Extracting the component materials positioned in the relatively high market & industrial capability area among the component materials positioned by the first positioning module as investment-induced component materials, Technology cooperation type selection system, characterized by extracting parts materials positioned in the relatively low starting & industrial competence area as technology-introduced parts materials. 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the attracted component materials are positioned by the second positioning module, The technical cooperation type extracting unit defines and extracts component materials positioned in a relatively high R & D area as R & D center type component materials, Technical cooperation type selection system, characterized in that the extraction of parts positioned in a relatively low R & D area by defining them as green field type parts. 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the extracted technical component is positioned by the third positioning module, The technical cooperation type extracting unit defines and extracts parts materials positioned in a relatively low technical capability area as jointly developed parts materials, Technology cooperation type selection system, characterized in that the extraction of parts positioned in the relatively high technical competence areas defined as technology transferable parts materials. 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the market & industrial capability evaluation data is calculated by weighted average of domestic industrial competitiveness, parts and materials related regulations and obstacles, growth potential of domestic market, and raw material supply and demand capability items included in the questionnaire. Technical cooperation type selection system. 19. The technical cooperation according to claim 18, wherein the R & D capability evaluation data is calculated by weighted average of the degree of possession and supply of skilled personnel included in the questionnaire, the degree of manpower related to the corresponding parts and materials, and the items of the R & D infrastructure. Type selection system. 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the technology competency evaluation data is calculated by weighted average of technology level, technology gap, and possessed technology compared to developed countries included in the questionnaire.

Images