JPH1079599A - Packaging plant diagnostic system - Google Patents
Packaging plant diagnostic systemInfo
- Publication number
- JPH1079599A JPH1079599A JP8232213A JP23221396A JPH1079599A JP H1079599 A JPH1079599 A JP H1079599A JP 8232213 A JP8232213 A JP 8232213A JP 23221396 A JP23221396 A JP 23221396A JP H1079599 A JPH1079599 A JP H1079599A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- mounting
- model
- cost
- factory
- production capacity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 title abstract 10
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Supply And Installment Of Electrical Components (AREA)
- Automatic Assembly (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、基板に部品を実装
する実装工場の診断をする実装工場診断システムに関す
るものである。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a mounting factory diagnosis system for diagnosing a mounting factory for mounting components on a board.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来の実装工場を診断する場合の方法を
図9に基づいて説明する。図9に示すように、実装工場
の診断は、その工場の実装コスト、生産能力、生産リー
ドタイムの実績値や試算結果と、以前の値との比較や、
課長クラスの勘と経験による判断で行われてきた。2. Description of the Related Art A conventional method for diagnosing a mounting factory will be described with reference to FIG. As shown in FIG. 9, the diagnosis of the mounting factory is performed by comparing the actual value or the trial calculation result of the mounting cost, the production capacity, and the production lead time of the factory with the previous value,
The decision was made based on the intuition and experience of the section manager.
【0003】その際の実装コストの実績値は、実装工場
全体の実績値を設備費、材料費、人件費、経費に按分す
ることにより算出していた。また、実装コストの試算
は、標準的で実装が容易な角チップ部品から異形で実装
が難しいQFPやコネクタまで一律の標準実装コストに
総実装点数を乗ずることにより行われてきた。At that time, the actual value of the mounting cost was calculated by apportioning the actual value of the entire mounting factory into equipment costs, material costs, personnel costs, and expenses. Estimation of the mounting cost has been performed by multiplying the standard mounting cost by a total number of mounting points, from standard and easy-to-mount square chip components to odd-shaped and difficult to mount QFPs and connectors.
【0004】また、生産能力の試算は、過去の実績値、
または、上記異種の実装部品すべてに対して設定された
標準実装タクトと総実装点数を乗じたものを、本来、実
装対象部品や、実装難易度に対するマシン生産性等によ
り変動し得る実装能力を、一律にマシン標準実装能力と
し、このマシン標準実装能力で除したもので行われてき
た。[0004] Estimation of production capacity is based on past actual values,
Alternatively, the product obtained by multiplying the standard mounting tact set for all of the above different mounting components by the total number of mounting points is, originally, a mounting target component, and a mounting capability that can fluctuate due to machine productivity with respect to mounting difficulty. The standard is the machine standard mounting capability, and this is divided by this machine standard mounting capability.
【0005】また、生産リードタイムは実装工場の実績
値の平均値として計算していた。[0005] The production lead time has been calculated as an average of the actual values of the mounting factories.
【0006】[0006]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上記従
来の方法では、まず、実績値による診断では、生産形態
が大きく変化した場合、例えば、新実装工法を採用した
場合とか、勤務形態が変わった場合には、実装コスト、
生産リードタイムの実績値は大きく変化し、以前の値と
の比較は難しい。また、実装コストの試算では、すべて
の部品を同一の標準実装コストで試算しているために、
精度が悪く、診断の精度も悪いという問題がある。ま
た、生産能力の試算では、すべての部品を同一の標準実
装タクトで計算していることによって精度が悪く、診断
の精度が悪いという問題がある。However, in the above-mentioned conventional method, first, in the diagnosis based on the actual value, when the production mode changes greatly, for example, when a new mounting method is adopted or when the work mode changes. Includes implementation costs,
The actual value of the production lead time changes greatly, and it is difficult to compare with the previous value. In addition, in the estimation of mounting cost, since all parts were estimated at the same standard mounting cost,
There is a problem that accuracy is poor and diagnosis accuracy is also poor. Further, in the trial calculation of the production capacity, there is a problem that the accuracy is poor due to the calculation of all the components using the same standard mounting tact, and the accuracy of the diagnosis is poor.
【0007】また、生産リードタイムの診断では、生産
リードタイムを実装工法、実装難易度(実装密度、生産
ロット規模等)によらず、同列に診断するために精度が
悪いという問題がある。In the production lead time diagnosis, there is a problem that accuracy is poor because the production lead time is diagnosed in the same row irrespective of the mounting method and the mounting difficulty (mounting density, production lot scale, etc.).
【0008】本発明は、上記従来の問題点に鑑み、精度
の良い実装コスト計算値と、生産能力計算値と、リード
タイム計算値による実装工場の実状に即した評価値か
ら、最適な実装工場診断を可能とする実装工場診断シス
テムを提供することを目的としている。In view of the above-mentioned conventional problems, the present invention provides an optimal mounting factory based on an accurate mounting cost calculation value, a production capacity calculation value, and an evaluation value based on a lead time calculation value in accordance with the actual situation of the mounting factory. The purpose is to provide a mounting factory diagnosis system that enables diagnosis.
【0009】[0009]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の実装工場診断シ
ステムは、実装コストデータベースと、マシン特性デー
タベースと、モデル工場経営指標データベースと、実装
コスト検討アルゴリズムと、生産能力検討アルゴリズム
と、リードタイム検討アルゴリズムとを備え、現状の実
装コストや生産能力やリードタイムと理想とするモデル
工場経営指標から実装工場診断を行うようにし、精度の
良い実装工場診断を短時間で得られるようにしたもので
ある。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION A mounting factory diagnosis system according to the present invention comprises a mounting cost database, a machine characteristic database, a model factory management index database, a mounting cost study algorithm, a production capacity study algorithm, and a lead time study algorithm. Algorithms are used to perform mounting factory diagnosis based on the current mounting cost, production capacity, lead time, and ideal model factory management index, so that accurate mounting factory diagnosis can be obtained in a short time. .
【0010】[0010]
【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明の実装工場診断シス
テムの一実施形態を図1〜図8を参照して説明する。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of a mounting factory diagnosis system according to the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS.
【0011】実装工場においては、常に実装工場のコス
トがどのような状態にあるかを把握し、また適切な指標
により評価を行い、コストがかかりすぎている等の問題
がある部分については改善策を打たなければならないと
いう課題がある。また、実装工場の生産能力がどのよう
な状態にあるかを把握し、適切な指標により評価を行
い、問題がある部分については改善策が打たれなければ
ならないという課題がある。In a mounting factory, the state of the cost of the mounting factory is always grasped and evaluated by an appropriate index. If there is a problem such as an excessive cost, an improvement measure is taken. There is a problem that must be hit. In addition, there is a problem that it is necessary to grasp the state of the production capacity of the mounting factory, perform evaluation using an appropriate index, and take an improvement measure for a problematic part.
【0012】それに対し、図1に示すように、実装工場
概要、生産基板概要、生産条件概要、現状データリード
タイムなどのデータを、実装工場診断システム1に入力
することにより、実装コスト診断結果、生産能力診断結
果、及びリードタイム診断結果が出力されるように構成
されている。On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 1, by inputting data such as an outline of a mounting factory, an outline of a production board, an outline of a production condition, and a current data lead time to the mounting factory diagnosis system 1, a mounting cost diagnosis result is obtained. It is configured to output a production capacity diagnosis result and a lead time diagnosis result.
【0013】実装工場診断システム1は、図2に示すよ
うな実装コストデータベース2と、図3に示すようなマ
シン特性データベース3と、図4に示すようなモデル工
場経営指標データベース4と、図5に示すような実装コ
スト検討アルゴリズム5と、図6に示すような生産能力
検討アルゴリズム6と、リードタイム検討アルゴリズム
7にて構成されている。The mounting factory diagnosis system 1 includes a mounting cost database 2 as shown in FIG. 2, a machine characteristic database 3 as shown in FIG. 3, a model factory management index database 4 as shown in FIG. 6, a production capacity study algorithm 6 shown in FIG. 6, and a lead time study algorithm 7.
【0014】実装工場の診断に際しては、まず図2に示
す実装コストデータベース2と、図5に示す実装コスト
検討アルゴリズム5と、図4に示すモデル工場経営指標
データベース4を用いて、現状の実装コストとモデルと
なる実装コストを比較し、実装コストを評価する。At the time of diagnosing the mounting factory, first, the mounting cost database 2 shown in FIG. 2, the mounting cost study algorithm 5 shown in FIG. 5, and the model factory management index database 4 shown in FIG. And the implementation cost as a model, and evaluate the implementation cost.
【0015】また、図3に示すマシン特性テータベース
4と、図6に示す生産能力検討アルゴリズム6と、図4
に示すモデル工場経営指標データベース4を用いて、現
状の生産能力と、モデルとなる生産能力を比較し、生産
能力を評価する。Further, a machine characteristic database 4 shown in FIG. 3, a production capacity examination algorithm 6 shown in FIG.
By using the model factory management index database 4 shown in (1), the current production capacity is compared with the model production capacity to evaluate the production capacity.
【0016】また、図7に示す生産リードタイム検討ア
ルゴリズム7と、図4に示すモデル工場経営指標データ
ベース4を用いて、現状の生産リードタイムと、モデル
となる生産リードタイムを比較し、生産リードタイムを
評価する。Further, using the production lead time study algorithm 7 shown in FIG. 7 and the model factory management index database 4 shown in FIG. 4, the current production lead time is compared with the model production lead time, and the production lead time is compared. Evaluate the time.
【0017】これらの評価結果から、実装工場が理想と
する工場経営指標に比べて劣っている点を精度良く、容
易に明確化し把握することができ、実装工場の改善を的
確に行うことができる。また、診断を行いたいときにす
ぐに診断結果を得ることが可能なため、実装工場の課題
に対して対策を打つまでに発生するロスを最小にするこ
とができる。図8に具体的な診断結果の出力例を示す。[0017] From these evaluation results, it is possible to accurately and easily clarify and grasp points that the mounting factory is inferior to the ideal factory management index, and to improve the mounting factory accurately. . Further, since it is possible to obtain a diagnosis result immediately when it is desired to perform a diagnosis, it is possible to minimize the loss that occurs before taking measures against the problem of the mounting factory. FIG. 8 shows a specific output example of the diagnosis result.
【0018】また、以上の構成をとることで、新工法が
開発された場合や、新しいモデル指標が必要になった場
合には、適宜データベース、アルゴリズムを追加改善し
て新しい診断の要求に応えることができる。By adopting the above configuration, when a new construction method is developed or a new model index is required, the database and algorithm are appropriately added and improved to meet a new diagnosis request. Can be.
【0019】[0019]
【発明の効果】本発明の実装工場診断システムによれ
ば、以上の説明から明らかなように、実装コストデータ
ベースと、マシン特性データベースと、モデル工場経営
指標データベースと、実装コスト検討アルゴリズムと、
生産能力検討アルゴリズムと、リードタイム検討アルゴ
リズムとを備えているので、現状の実装コストや生産能
力やリードタイムに関する精度の良い実装工場診断指標
と理想とするモデル工場経営指標から的確な実装工場診
断を短時間で行うことができ、最適な実装工場改善を行
えるという効果が得られる。According to the mounting factory diagnosis system of the present invention, as apparent from the above description, the mounting cost database, the machine characteristic database, the model factory management index database, the mounting cost examination algorithm,
Since it is equipped with a production capacity examination algorithm and a lead time examination algorithm, accurate mounting factory diagnosis can be performed based on accurate mounting factory diagnosis indexes related to current mounting costs, production capacity and lead time, and ideal model factory management indexes. This can be performed in a short time, and an effect that optimal mounting factory improvement can be performed can be obtained.
【図1】本発明の実装工場診断検討システムの一実施形
態の構成を示すブロック図である。FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of an embodiment of a mounting factory diagnosis and examination system of the present invention.
【図2】同実施形態の実装コストデータベースの説明図
である。FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of a mounting cost database according to the embodiment;
【図3】同実施形態のマシン特性データベースの説明図
である。FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a machine characteristic database of the embodiment.
【図4】同実施形態のモデル工場経営指標データベース
の説明図である。FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of a model factory management index database of the embodiment.
【図5】同実施形態の実装コスト検討アルゴリズムの説
明図である。FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of an implementation cost study algorithm of the embodiment.
【図6】同実施形態の生産能力検討アルゴリズムの説明
図である。FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of a production capacity study algorithm of the embodiment.
【図7】同実施形態のリードタイム検討アルゴリズムの
説明図である。FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram of a lead time study algorithm of the embodiment.
【図8】同実施形態での診断結果出力画面の説明図であ
る。FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of a diagnosis result output screen in the embodiment.
【図9】従来例の実装工場診断方法の説明図である。FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram of a conventional mounting factory diagnosis method.
1 実装工場診断システム 2 実装コストデータベース 3 マシン特性データベース 4 モデル工場経営指標データベース 5 実装コスト検討アルゴリズム 6 生産能力検討アルゴリズム 7 リードタイム検討アルゴリズム REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 1 mounting factory diagnosis system 2 mounting cost database 3 machine characteristic database 4 model factory management index database 5 mounting cost study algorithm 6 production capacity study algorithm 7 lead time study algorithm
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 兼松 宏一 大阪府門真市大字門真1006番地 松下電器 産業株式会社内 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuing on the front page (72) Inventor Koichi Kanematsu 1006 Kazuma Kadoma, Kadoma City, Osaka Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
Claims (1)
データベースと、モデル工場経営指標データベースと、
実装コスト検討アルゴリズムと、生産能力検討アルゴリ
ズムと、リードタイム検討アルゴリズムとを備え、現状
の実装コストや生産能力やリードタイムと理想とするモ
デル工場経営指標から実装工場診断を行うようにしたこ
とを特徴とする実装工場診断システム。1. A mounting cost database, a machine characteristic database, a model factory management index database,
It is equipped with an implementation cost study algorithm, a production capacity study algorithm, and a lead time study algorithm, and performs the implementation factory diagnosis based on the current implementation cost, production capacity, lead time, and ideal model factory management index. And mounting factory diagnostic system.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP23221396A JP3634085B2 (en) | 1996-09-02 | 1996-09-02 | Mounting factory diagnostic system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP23221396A JP3634085B2 (en) | 1996-09-02 | 1996-09-02 | Mounting factory diagnostic system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH1079599A true JPH1079599A (en) | 1998-03-24 |
JP3634085B2 JP3634085B2 (en) | 2005-03-30 |
Family
ID=16935766
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP23221396A Expired - Fee Related JP3634085B2 (en) | 1996-09-02 | 1996-09-02 | Mounting factory diagnostic system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP3634085B2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2001100838A (en) * | 1999-09-27 | 2001-04-13 | Hitachi Ltd | Method and apparatus for evaluating the likelihood of failure in manufacturing workplace, method and apparatus for evaluating product quality, and recording medium |
US6401000B1 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2002-06-04 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Fraction defective estimating method and system for estimating an assembly fraction defective of an article |
US6526326B2 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2003-02-25 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Fraction defective estimating method and system for estimating an assembly fraction defective of an article |
CN109447453A (en) * | 2018-10-24 | 2019-03-08 | 湖南工业大学 | A kind of method of multi-stage network DEA Model evaluate packaging greenness |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0520334A (en) * | 1991-07-16 | 1993-01-29 | Toshiba Corp | Production system evaluating device |
JPH06149826A (en) * | 1992-11-12 | 1994-05-31 | Kao Corp | Support device for plant management |
-
1996
- 1996-09-02 JP JP23221396A patent/JP3634085B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0520334A (en) * | 1991-07-16 | 1993-01-29 | Toshiba Corp | Production system evaluating device |
JPH06149826A (en) * | 1992-11-12 | 1994-05-31 | Kao Corp | Support device for plant management |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6401000B1 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2002-06-04 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Fraction defective estimating method and system for estimating an assembly fraction defective of an article |
US6526326B2 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2003-02-25 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Fraction defective estimating method and system for estimating an assembly fraction defective of an article |
US6553273B1 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2003-04-22 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Fraction defective estimating method, system for carrying out the same and recording medium |
US6895350B2 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2005-05-17 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Fraction defective estimating method, system for carrying out the same recording medium |
JP2001100838A (en) * | 1999-09-27 | 2001-04-13 | Hitachi Ltd | Method and apparatus for evaluating the likelihood of failure in manufacturing workplace, method and apparatus for evaluating product quality, and recording medium |
US6625511B1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2003-09-23 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Evaluation method and its apparatus of work shop and product quality |
CN109447453A (en) * | 2018-10-24 | 2019-03-08 | 湖南工业大学 | A kind of method of multi-stage network DEA Model evaluate packaging greenness |
CN109447453B (en) * | 2018-10-24 | 2022-05-03 | 湖南工业大学 | Method for evaluating packaging greenness through multi-stage network data envelope analysis model |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP3634085B2 (en) | 2005-03-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
TWI435233B (en) | Device and method for managing abnormality prediction of semiconductor process equipments | |
CN1231414A (en) | System and method for measuring electricity consumption in refrigerator | |
JP2004505364A (en) | Remote diagnosis method of industrial technical process | |
US7320124B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for analyzing and displaying operations of computer and computer program for the same | |
JPH1079599A (en) | Packaging plant diagnostic system | |
CN111586195A (en) | A communication topology method and system for the Internet of Things | |
JP3319310B2 (en) | Fault diagnosis circuit | |
RU2210112C2 (en) | Unified method for estimating effectiveness of large systems | |
US20040032249A1 (en) | Electric component test system and electric component test method | |
CN113504438A (en) | Method and device for detecting insulation impedance of column head cabinet and column head cabinet | |
CN206074778U (en) | A kind of LED drive power test machine | |
JPH08110262A (en) | On-line rotary object diagnostic device | |
WO2020115802A1 (en) | Energy management assisting device, energy management assisting system, energy management assisting method, and energy management assisting program | |
JP3645583B2 (en) | Mounting quality analysis method | |
CN115277487B (en) | Communication processing system of electronic terminal | |
JP3295124B2 (en) | Device evaluation test apparatus and method | |
JPS58148971A (en) | Decision device for insulation and conduction of signal line of substrate | |
SU1466718A1 (en) | Method of determining operatorъs working ability | |
CN118409171A (en) | System for testing electric performance of motor locking device and testing method thereof | |
CN113189935A (en) | Non-invasive production beat prediction method and system based on time sequence power data | |
JPS63117238A (en) | Control system for automobile inspection line | |
JPH1145108A (en) | Plant operating condition monitoring method | |
JP3077915B2 (en) | Graph display method of harmonic analysis data by wattmeter | |
JPH01158509A (en) | Verifying device for expert system | |
JP2002311068A (en) | Logarithmic graph display device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20040819 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20040914 |
|
A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20041111 |
|
TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20041207 |
|
A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20041222 |
|
R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080107 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090107 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100107 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |