[go: up one dir, main page]

JPH10102208A - Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust parts with excellent heat resistance, workability and corrosion resistance at welds - Google Patents

Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust parts with excellent heat resistance, workability and corrosion resistance at welds

Info

Publication number
JPH10102208A
JPH10102208A JP25329996A JP25329996A JPH10102208A JP H10102208 A JPH10102208 A JP H10102208A JP 25329996 A JP25329996 A JP 25329996A JP 25329996 A JP25329996 A JP 25329996A JP H10102208 A JPH10102208 A JP H10102208A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
less
corrosion resistance
muffler
steel
workability
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP25329996A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3713833B2 (en
Inventor
Atsushi Miyazaki
宮崎  淳
Junichiro Hirasawa
淳一郎 平澤
Kazuhide Ishii
和秀 石井
Susumu Sato
佐藤  進
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Kawasaki Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kawasaki Steel Corp filed Critical Kawasaki Steel Corp
Priority to JP25329996A priority Critical patent/JP3713833B2/en
Publication of JPH10102208A publication Critical patent/JPH10102208A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3713833B2 publication Critical patent/JP3713833B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Exhaust Silencers (AREA)

Abstract

(57)【要約】 【課題】本発明は、優れた耐熱性を持ち、且つ、従来マ
フラーに使用されていた17%Cr−−0.1%Si−
0.2%Ti−0.8%Mo添加のフェライト系ステン
レス鋼よりも優れた溶接部の耐食性を有する安価なエン
ジン排気部材用フェライト系ステンレス鋼を提供するこ
とを目的としている。 【解決手段】重量%で、C:0.02%未満、Si:
0.8%以上、1.6%未満、Mn:0.20%未満、
P:0.04%未満、S:0.02%未満、Cr:10
%以上、16%未満、Ni:0.05%以上、1.0%
未満、N:0.02%未満、Ti:0.002%以上、
0.03%未満、Nb:0.43以上、0.6%未満、
を含有し、残部Fe及び不可避的不純物からなる、耐熱
性、加工性及び、マフラーの溶接部耐食性に優れたエン
ジン排気部材用フェライト系ステンレス鋼である。
(57) [Summary] The present invention has excellent heat resistance and 17% Cr-0.1% Si- which has been conventionally used for a muffler.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an inexpensive ferritic stainless steel for an engine exhaust member having better corrosion resistance of a weld portion than a ferritic stainless steel containing 0.2% Ti-0.8% Mo. SOLUTION: In weight%, C: less than 0.02%, Si:
0.8% or more, less than 1.6%, Mn: less than 0.20%,
P: less than 0.04%, S: less than 0.02%, Cr: 10
% Or more, less than 16%, Ni: 0.05% or more, 1.0%
, N: less than 0.02%, Ti: 0.002% or more,
Less than 0.03%, Nb: 0.43 or more, less than 0.6%,
This is a ferritic stainless steel for an engine exhaust member excellent in heat resistance, workability, and corrosion resistance of a welded portion of a muffler, comprising Fe and inevitable impurities.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、自動車排気部材の
用途に適したフェライト系ステンレス鋼に関し、特に、
自動車のエンジンに近い側(高耐熱性が必要)からマフ
ラーのような耐食性を要求される部位での使用を想定し
た、耐熱性、加工性および溶接部耐食性に優れたエンジ
ン排気部材用フェライト系ステンレス鋼に係わる。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a ferritic stainless steel suitable for use in automobile exhaust members,
Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust parts with excellent heat resistance, workability, and welded part corrosion resistance, assuming use in parts requiring corrosion resistance, such as mufflers, from the side close to the engine of the automobile (high heat resistance is required). Related to steel.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】一般に、フェライト系ステンレス鋼は、
オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼と比べて安価であること
から、自動車排気系の材料に多用されている。この自動
車排気系の中でも、排気マニホールドのように、900
℃を超える程度にまで温度が上昇する部位では、特に優
れた耐熱性が必要であり、SUS430 JIL(19
Cr−0.4Si−0.4Nb−0.5Cu)が使用さ
れてきた。一方、マフラーに代表されるように、排気温
度が比較的低い部位には、排ガスからの凝縮水が溜りや
すく、該マフラーの腐食が問題になるので、耐食性に優
れたSUS436 LT(17Cr−0.1Si−0.
2Ti−0.8Mo)が使用されてきた。
2. Description of the Related Art Generally, ferritic stainless steel is
Since it is inexpensive compared to austenitic stainless steel, it is widely used as a material for automobile exhaust systems. In this automobile exhaust system, as in the exhaust manifold, 900
In a region where the temperature rises to a level exceeding ℃, particularly excellent heat resistance is required, and SUS430 JIL (19)
Cr-0.4Si-0.4Nb-0.5Cu) has been used. On the other hand, as represented by a muffler, condensed water from the exhaust gas easily accumulates in a portion where the exhaust temperature is relatively low, and corrosion of the muffler becomes a problem. Therefore, SUS436 LT (17Cr-0. 1Si-0.
2Ti-0.8Mo) has been used.

【0003】このように、自動車排気系に使用される材
料は、使用部位の温度により全く異なる特性が要求さ
れ、「使用者は、材料を区別しなければならない」とい
う問題と、「特に、マフラー用材料は、高Cr、Mo添
加鋼のため、コスト高である」という問題があった。そ
のため、高温部から低温部まで幅広く適用でき、且つ安
価な統一材料の開発が、強く望まれていた。また、材料
の供給側にとっても、かかる統一材料は、品質管理及び
生産効率の点で大きなメリットがあるので、使用者及び
供給者のいずれからも強く統一材料の開発要求があっ
た。しかしながら、そのような統一材料は存在していな
いのが現状である。
As described above, materials used in automobile exhaust systems are required to have completely different characteristics depending on the temperature of a use site, and the problem that "users must distinguish materials" and "particularly, mufflers The cost of the material for use is high due to the high Cr and Mo added steel. " Therefore, there has been a strong demand for the development of a low-cost unified material that can be widely applied from a high-temperature portion to a low-temperature portion. In addition, since the unified material has a great merit in terms of quality control and production efficiency for the material supply side, there has been a strong demand from both the user and the supplier for the development of the unified material. However, at present, there is no such unified material.

【0004】ここで、高温部側での使用を想定した従来
からある材料を紹介すると、例えば、特開平8−603
06号公報は、自動車排気系部材用フェライト系ステン
レス鋼板がある。この材料は、排気系を一つの鋼種で一
体化することを目的として開発されたが、該公報の3
頁、コラム4「0017」に明記されているように、
「排気マニフォールドからセンター・パイプまで」と明
記されており、排気系高温部だけでの材料統一を想定し
ており、マフラーまでは想定していない。さらに、該公
報は、「開発した鋼材が、Si:0.6〜1.5%、C
r:16〜22%のような比較的高いSi、Crレベル
であるにも関わらず、マフラー材のような腐食環境に耐
え得ない」ことを示唆していた。実際に、発明者の実験
調査によっても、高Cr化のみでは、マフラー材への適
用はできないことが確認されている。なお、その理由に
ついては、後述の「発明の詳細な説明」の欄で説明す
る。
Here, a conventional material which is assumed to be used in a high-temperature portion is introduced.
No. 06 discloses a ferrite stainless steel sheet for automobile exhaust system members. This material was developed for the purpose of integrating the exhaust system with one steel type.
As specified in page 4, column 4 [0017],
It clearly states "from the exhaust manifold to the center pipe", and assumes that the materials will be unified only in the high temperature part of the exhaust system, not the muffler. Further, the gazette states that the developed steel material has a Si content of 0.6 to 1.5%,
r: Despite relatively high Si and Cr levels such as 16-22%, they cannot withstand a corrosive environment such as a muffler material. " In fact, experimental investigations by the inventor have confirmed that application to a muffler material cannot be achieved only by increasing the Cr content. The reason will be described later in the section “Detailed description of the invention”.

【0005】また、特開昭57−85960(US.p
atent No.4331474)号公報は、Nb、
Al複合添加鋼を開示している。その鋼材は、靭性に対
する悪影響を除くため、Tiを不可避的残留レベルに維
持し、Alを0.1%以上、Nbを0.45%以下に厳
しく調整することを特徴としている。特に、該特開昭5
7−85960号公報では、Si、Tiの効果の認識が
ないため、発明例あるいは比較例のいずれに開示された
鋼も、Siは、0.6%未満であり、Tiは、残留(記
載なし)か0.23%のような過大レベルであった。
Further, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 57-85960 (US Pat.
attain No. No. 4,331,474) discloses Nb,
Disclosed are Al-added steel. The steel is characterized in that Ti is maintained at an unavoidable residual level, and Al is strictly adjusted to 0.1% or more and Nb to 0.45% or less in order to eliminate an adverse effect on toughness. In particular, as disclosed in
In JP-A-7-85960, there is no recognition of the effects of Si and Ti. Therefore, in the steels disclosed in any of the invention examples and the comparative examples, Si is less than 0.6%, and Ti is residual (not described). ) Or 0.23%.

【0006】また、特開平6−248394号公報は、
そのコラム2「0007」に記載されているように、フ
ロント・パイプ、センター・パイプでの使用を考慮した
高温塩害特性に優れたフェライト系ステンレス鋼を開示
している。それは、コラム4「0020」に明記されて
いるように、溶接部の耐食性向上のため、Nb、Tiを
添加するとしており、その効果は、等価なものとの認識
である。そのため、該公報記載の発明鋼及び比較鋼のい
ずれもがNb単独添加されているだけで、高Si化、低
Cr化し、かつ0.43%以上のNb添加鋼に、微量の
Ti添加がマフラー腐食に著しい効果があるとの知見、
示唆は見られない。
[0006] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 6-248394 discloses that
As described in Column 2 [0007], a ferritic stainless steel excellent in high-temperature salt damage characteristics in consideration of use in a front pipe and a center pipe is disclosed. That is, as specified in column 4 “0020”, Nb and Ti are added to improve the corrosion resistance of the welded portion, and the effect is recognized as being equivalent. For this reason, only the addition of Nb alone to the invention steel and the comparative steel described in the publication, the addition of a small amount of Ti to the steel with high Si and low Cr and 0.43% or more of the Nb added is scarfed. Knowledge that it has a significant effect on corrosion,
No suggestion is found.

【0007】また、特公平3−4617(US.pat
ent No.4461811)号公報は、ロウづけ性
のよい安定化フェライト系ステンレス鋼の成分を開示し
ている。そこでは、Tiはろうずけ性に悪影響を及ぼす
ため、厳しく制限しているが、溶接部の耐食性向上に関
する考慮は見られない。事実、該公報に開示されている
発明例及び比較例は、いずれもSi含有量は比較的低い
(0.6%以下)。
Also, Japanese Patent Publication No. 3-4617 (US Pat.
ent No. Japanese Patent No. 4461811) discloses a component of a stabilized ferritic stainless steel having good brazing properties. Here, Ti is strictly limited because it has an adverse effect on the brazing property, but no consideration is given to improving the corrosion resistance of the welded portion. In fact, both the invention examples and the comparative examples disclosed in this publication have relatively low Si contents (0.6% or less).

【0008】また、US.patent No.441
7921には、Welded ferittic st
ainless steel articleの開示が
ある。そこには、NbとTiを等価なものとしており、
高Si化し、さらに比較的多量のNbに微量のTiの複
合添加が、溶接のマフラー耐食性向上に著しく効果があ
るとの知見及び示唆も見られない。さらに、Siの添加
効果も発見していないため、1%以下、好ましくは0.
3〜0.6%(クレーム3、及び本文コラム3、29行
目)のように低めに制限している。加えて、実施例及び
比較例のいずれもが、0.2%以上のTi単独添加鋼で
ある。
Further, US Pat. Patent No. 441
7921 has a welded ferriticst
There is a disclosure of an ainless steel article. There, Nb and Ti are equivalent,
There is no knowledge or suggestion that the increase in Si and the addition of a small amount of Ti to a relatively large amount of Nb are significantly effective in improving the muffler corrosion resistance of welding. Furthermore, since the effect of the addition of Si has not been found, 1% or less, preferably 0.1% or less.
3 to 0.6% (claim 3, and text column 3, line 29). In addition, each of Examples and Comparative Examples is a steel containing only 0.2% or more of Ti.

【0009】また、特開平7−268554号公報は、
成形性及び耐熱性の優れた自動車排気系用フェライト系
ステンレス鋼板を開示している。しかしながら、この鋼
材も、高温側の部位を想定したものであり、マフラー腐
食についての考慮がなく、そのため、発明例及び比較例
は、いずれも0.8%未満のSiレベルであり、マフラ
ーの溶接部耐食性が不十分である。
[0009] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 7-268554 discloses that
A ferritic stainless steel sheet for automobile exhaust systems having excellent formability and heat resistance is disclosed. However, this steel material is also supposed to be on the high temperature side, and there is no consideration for muffler corrosion. Therefore, both the invention examples and the comparative examples have a Si level of less than 0.8%, Insufficient corrosion resistance.

【0010】また、本発明者は、特開平8−3698号
公報で、自動車排気系材料に使用可能な安価な熱延フェ
ライト鋼を開示した。しかしながら、この鋼材は、熱延
板の加工性向上を主目的とし、Tiを可及的に低く、且
つPを積極的に添加することを技術思想としている。該
特開平8−3698号公報の出願当時は、母材の高耐食
性材は、溶接部の耐食性も向上し、結果としてマフラー
寿命を向上させるとの認識が一般的であったが、近年、
母材が高耐食性であっても、マフラーの溶接部耐食性が
向上するとは限らないことがわかってきた。そのため、
特開平8−3698号公報当時の知見では、Cr、S
i、Nb、Ti、Pのマフラー溶接部に関する耐食性に
関する知見がない。
The present inventor has disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 8-3698 an inexpensive hot-rolled ferritic steel which can be used as an automobile exhaust system material. However, this steel material has a main purpose of improving the workability of a hot-rolled sheet, and has a technical idea of lowering Ti as much as possible and actively adding P. At the time of filing of the Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 8-3698, it was generally recognized that a high corrosion-resistant material of a base material also improved the corrosion resistance of a welded portion and, as a result, improved the muffler life.
It has been found that even if the base material has high corrosion resistance, the weld corrosion resistance of the muffler does not always improve. for that reason,
According to the knowledge at the time of JP-A-8-3698, Cr, S
There is no knowledge about the corrosion resistance of the muffler welds of i, Nb, Ti, and P.

【0011】一方、低温部側での使用を想定した鋼材例
を紹介すると、まず、Moを1%以上添加することを特
徴とする特開平5−112848号公報記載の鋼があ
る。この鋼材は、特に、マフラー腐食を念頭に置き、母
材部の耐食性を向上させている。発明者は、最近、「マ
フラー腐食で問題となる部位は、溶接部であり、そこで
の著しい腐食を起点とし、外部応力によって、亀裂が伝
播し溶接部が破断することが最も問題なのであり、母材
の腐食レベルは、溶接部と比較して軽微であるため、マ
フラー寿命に大きく影響しない」ことをつきとめた。溶
接部が最も腐食するので、この部分での腐食ピットの発
生を低減することによって、破断の基点を防止すれば良
いのである。しかしながら、特開平5−112848号
公報で開示されているようなMoの添加では、後述する
ように、溶接部の耐食性にはほとんど効果がないと同時
に、コストの面でも不利である。
On the other hand, as an example of a steel material assumed to be used in the low-temperature part side, there is a steel described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. HEI 5-112848, characterized by adding Mo by 1% or more. This steel material improves the corrosion resistance of the base material part, especially in consideration of muffler corrosion. The inventor recently stated, `` The site that poses a problem in muffler corrosion is the weld, and the most problematic point is that, starting from significant corrosion there, cracks are propagated by external stress and the weld is fractured. The corrosion level of the material is small compared to the welded part and does not significantly affect the muffler life. " Since the welded portion corrodes most, it is only necessary to reduce the occurrence of corrosion pits at this portion, thereby preventing the base point of fracture. However, the addition of Mo as disclosed in JP-A-5-112848 has little effect on the corrosion resistance of the welded portion and is disadvantageous in terms of cost, as described later.

【0012】また、溶接部の耐食性を向上させるのに、
Ti、Nb等の安定化元素を添加することは、公知であ
る。例えば、上記の特開平5−112848号公報にお
いても、Ti、Nb添加の理由が溶接部の耐粒界腐食性
向上の点からと記述されている。しかしながら、近年、
マフラー腐食での問題は、溶接部の著しい腐食を起点と
する接続部(溶接構造)の破断であることが判明してお
り、単に、Mo、Ti、Nbを添加するのみでは、溶接
部の耐食性は十分ではないことも判明した。その理由
は、特開平5−112848号公報に記載されているよ
うに、マフラーでの凝縮水は、高pH(〜9)から低p
H(〜2)まで極端に変化するので、単に、Mo、T
i、Nbを添加するのみではマフラーの溶接部耐食性が
十分ではないものと考えられる。この点を考慮した材料
開発がなされていなかったため、現時点でもマフラー耐
食性に優れた安価な材料が開発されていないのである。
In order to improve the corrosion resistance of the weld,
It is known to add stabilizing elements such as Ti and Nb. For example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 5-112848 also describes that the reason for adding Ti and Nb is to improve the intergranular corrosion resistance of the welded portion. However, in recent years,
It has been found that the problem with muffler corrosion is the breakage of the connection (weld structure) originating from the significant corrosion of the weld, and the addition of Mo, Ti, and Nb simply results in the corrosion resistance of the weld. Turned out not to be enough. The reason is that, as described in JP-A-5-112848, the condensed water in the muffler is changed from a high pH ((9) to a low pH.
H (~ 2), it is extremely difficult to calculate Mo, T
It is considered that the addition of i and Nb alone does not provide sufficient weld corrosion resistance of the muffler. Since no material was developed in consideration of this point, an inexpensive material having excellent muffler corrosion resistance has not been developed at present.

【0013】さらに、上記した統一材料がないという問
題に加えて、既存のマフラー用のフェライト系ステンレ
ス鋼では、0.8%以上のMo添加による製造コストの
上昇も問題となっている。そのため、最近は、マフラー
の溶接部の耐食性向上が強く求められていると同時に、
省Mo化によるコスト低減の問題がある。また、特開平
4−228547号公報は、耐粒界腐食性、造管性、高
温強度に優れたフェライト系ステンレス鋼を開示してい
る。しかしながら、そこでは、耐粒界腐食性の向上をは
かっているものの、単に所謂シュトラウス試験で評価し
ているだけである。前述したように、マフラーの凝縮水
は、高pH(〜9)から低pH(〜2)まで極端に変化
するものであるから、シュトラウス試験ではマフラー腐
食性を正しく評価できいない。そのため、そこでの発明
例及び比較例のいずれも0.6%以下の低いSiであ
り、後述するように、マフラーの溶接部耐食性には不十
分である。
Further, in addition to the above-mentioned problem that there is no unified material, in the existing ferritic stainless steel for muffler, there is also a problem that the production cost is increased by adding 0.8% or more of Mo. Therefore, recently there has been a strong demand for improved corrosion resistance of the welded part of the muffler,
There is a problem of cost reduction by saving Mo. Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 4-22847 discloses a ferritic stainless steel excellent in intergranular corrosion resistance, tube forming properties and high-temperature strength. However, there is an attempt to improve the intergranular corrosion resistance, but it is merely evaluated by a so-called Strauss test. As described above, since the condensed water of the muffler changes extremely from a high pH (〜9) to a low pH (〜2), the muffler corrosion cannot be correctly evaluated in the Strauss test. Therefore, both of the invention examples and the comparative examples have low Si of 0.6% or less, which is insufficient for the corrosion resistance of the welded portion of the muffler, as described later.

【0014】[0014]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は、かかる事情
を鑑み、優れた耐熱性を持ち、且つ、従来マフラーに使
用されていた17%Cr−0.1%Si−0.2%Ti
−0.8%Mo添加のフェライト系ステンレス鋼よりも
優れた溶接部の耐食性を有する安価なエンジン排気部材
用フェライト系ステンレス鋼を提供することを目的とし
ている。さらに、エンジン排気系での高温部および低温
部での使用材料の区別を不要にする統一材料の提供をも
目的としている。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In view of the above circumstances, the present invention has excellent heat resistance and has been used in conventional mufflers for 17% Cr-0.1% Si-0.2% Ti.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an inexpensive ferritic stainless steel for an engine exhaust member that has better corrosion resistance at a welded portion than a ferritic stainless steel added with -0.8% Mo. It is another object of the present invention to provide a unified material that eliminates the need to distinguish materials used in a high temperature part and a low temperature part in an engine exhaust system.

【0015】[0015]

【課題を解決するための手段】発明者は、上記目的を達
成するため、エンジン排気部材用に必要とされる耐熱性
(高温強度)、及びその鋼材に必要な加工性は、Nb添
加で向上するという公知事実に基づき、まず、マフラー
の溶接部耐食性の向上を詳細に検討した。マフラーの耐
久性で問題となるのは、主に、溶接部の破断である。溶
接部が母材部より耐食性に劣るのは公知であり、さらに
溶接部に応力が最も集中することも明らかである。従っ
て、母材のみが優れた耐食性を示しても、最も腐食され
易い部分は溶接部であり、かつ溶接部が最も大きな応力
集中を受けるため、腐食ピット部分での大きな応力が破
断を誘発する。従って、溶接部の耐食性を向上させるこ
とが、マフラーの寿命を向上させる。
Means for Solving the Problems In order to achieve the above object, the inventor has improved the heat resistance (high-temperature strength) required for an engine exhaust member and the workability required for the steel material by adding Nb. First, based on the known fact that the muffler does, the improvement in the corrosion resistance of the welded portion of the muffler was examined in detail. The problem with the durability of the muffler is mainly the breakage of the weld. It is known that the welded portion has lower corrosion resistance than the base material portion, and it is also clear that stress is most concentrated on the welded portion. Therefore, even if only the base material shows excellent corrosion resistance, the most susceptible to corrosion is the welded portion, and the welded portion is subjected to the highest stress concentration, so that large stress in the corrosion pit portion induces rupture. Therefore, improving the corrosion resistance of the welded portion improves the life of the muffler.

【0016】かかる実際の車での調査結果を基に、マフ
ラーの溶接部耐食性の向上を詳細に検討し、得られた重
要な知見を以下に示す。なお、下記図1及び2に関する
試験条件は、「実施例」の欄で詳述する。 (1)母材部が、溶接部より耐食性の良好なことは明ら
かであるが、母材部の耐食性が良い材料は、溶接部との
耐食性の差が大きく、溶接部に腐食が集中し、溶接部の
耐食性向上が困難であることを知見した。その結果、図
1に示すように、比較的母材部の耐食性が低い、低Cr
系(10〜16%Cr)材料がマフラーの溶接部耐食性
の向上に有利である。
Based on the results of the actual vehicle survey, the improvement of the weld corrosion resistance of the muffler was examined in detail, and the important findings obtained are shown below. The test conditions for FIGS. 1 and 2 below will be described in detail in the “Examples” section. (1) It is clear that the base metal part has better corrosion resistance than the welded part, but a material with good corrosion resistance in the base material part has a large difference in corrosion resistance from the welded part, and corrosion concentrates on the welded part. It was found that it was difficult to improve the corrosion resistance of the weld. As a result, as shown in FIG.
A system (10 to 16% Cr) material is advantageous for improving the corrosion resistance of the muffler at the weld.

【0017】(2)図1、2に示すように、Siを0.
8%以上添加し、Crを10〜16%と比較的低くし、
Nbが0.4%以上添加されている成分系に、Tiを
0.03%を上限として積極的に添加すると、マフラー
の溶接部耐食性が著しく向上し、17%Cr−0.1%
Si−0.2%Ti−0.8%Mo鋼の溶接部以上の特
性が得られる。
(2) As shown in FIGS.
8% or more is added to make Cr relatively low, 10 to 16%,
If Ti is positively added to the component system to which Nb is added at 0.4% or more with the upper limit being 0.03%, the corrosion resistance of the welded portion of the muffler is significantly improved, and 17% Cr-0.1%
The characteristics more than the weld of Si-0.2% Ti-0.8% Mo steel are obtained.

【0018】これは、溶接部のスケールがSi、Nb、
Tiにより強化され母材部の耐食性に近づいたため、溶
接部に腐食が集中しなかったためと推定される。一方、
従来からある17%Cr−0.1%Si−0.2%Ti
−0.8%Mo鋼の場合には、母材部が著しく優れた耐
食性を示すため、腐食が溶接部に集中し、結果として、
低Cr−高Si−Nb−微量Ti鋼よりも溶接部耐食性
が劣っていると推定できる。
This is because the scale of the weld is Si, Nb,
It is presumed that corrosion was not concentrated on the welded portion because it was strengthened by Ti and approached the corrosion resistance of the base material portion. on the other hand,
Conventional 17% Cr-0.1% Si-0.2% Ti
In the case of -0.8% Mo steel, the base material shows remarkably excellent corrosion resistance, so that the corrosion concentrates on the weld, and as a result,
It can be estimated that the corrosion resistance of the welded portion is inferior to that of the low Cr-high Si-Nb-trace Ti steel.

【0019】さらに、図2には、11%Cr−0.1%
Si−0.2%Tiの溶接部耐食性に及ぼすMoの影響
も示す。驚くべきことには、溶接部へのMoの添加効果
は、Siの添加効果に比較して著しく小さかった。つま
り、溶接部の耐食性の向上には、Moの添加は殆ど効果
がなく、鋼材を低Cr−高Si化し、Nb添加し、さら
に微量なTi添加が必要であることが確認されたのであ
る。なお、各元素の溶接部の耐食性に及ぼす影響に関す
る詳細な理由は、後述の「成分限定」で説明する。 (3)さらに、上記鋼材にAl、Cuを比較的少量添加
することで、マフラーの溶接部耐食性がさらに向上す
る。 (4)また、P含有量は、マフラーの溶接部耐食性に大
きく影響し、低い程好ましい。 (5)上記した成分系は、ベースであるNb添加鋼の耐
熱性、加工性を劣化させない。
FIG. 2 shows that 11% Cr-0.1%
The effect of Mo on the weld corrosion resistance of Si-0.2% Ti is also shown. Surprisingly, the effect of adding Mo to the weld was significantly smaller than the effect of adding Si. In other words, it was confirmed that the addition of Mo had almost no effect on the improvement of the corrosion resistance of the welded portion, and it was confirmed that the steel material needed to be made Cr-high Si, Nb was added, and a small amount of Ti was added. The detailed reason for the effect of each element on the corrosion resistance of the welded portion will be described in “Limited components” described later. (3) Further, by adding a relatively small amount of Al and Cu to the above-mentioned steel material, the weld corrosion resistance of the muffler is further improved. (4) Further, the P content greatly affects the corrosion resistance of the welded portion of the muffler, and is preferably as low as possible. (5) The above-described component system does not deteriorate the heat resistance and workability of the base Nb-added steel.

【0020】発明者は、以上の新規な知見を具現化すべ
く鋭意努力を続け、耐熱性、加工性及び溶接部耐食性に
優れたフェライト系ステンレス鋼を発明するに至ったの
である。すなわち、本発明は、重量%で、C:0.02
%未満、Si:0.8%以上、1.6%未満、Mn:
0.20%未満、P:0.04%未満、S:0.02%
未満、Cr:10%以上、16%未満、Ni:0.05
%以上、1.0%未満、N:0.02%未満、Ti:
0.002%以上、0.03%未満、Nb:0.43%
以上、0.6%未満、を含有し、残部Fe及び不可避的
不純物からなる、耐熱性、加工性及び溶接部耐食性に優
れたエンジン排気部材用フェライト系ステンレス鋼であ
る。
The inventor of the present invention has made intensive efforts to realize the above-mentioned novel findings, and has invented a ferritic stainless steel excellent in heat resistance, workability and corrosion resistance at a welded portion. That is, in the present invention, C: 0.02% by weight.
%, Si: 0.8% or more and less than 1.6%, Mn:
Less than 0.20%, P: less than 0.04%, S: 0.02%
, Cr: 10% or more, less than 16%, Ni: 0.05
% Or more, less than 1.0%, N: less than 0.02%, Ti:
0.002% or more, less than 0.03%, Nb: 0.43%
It is a ferritic stainless steel for an engine exhaust member excellent in heat resistance, workability, and welded portion corrosion resistance, which contains less than 0.6%, the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities.

【0021】また、本発明は、さらに、重量%で、 Al:0.02%以上0.5%未満 Cu:0.02%以上0.3%未満 のうちから選んだ1種又は2種を追加含有させたり、あ
るいはMo:0.05%以上0.8%未満、さらに加え
て、 Ca:0.001%以上0.03%未満、 B:0.0002%以上、0.005%未満、 を含有させた耐熱性、加工性及び溶接部耐食性に優れた
エンジン排気部材用フェライト系ステンレス鋼である。
Further, the present invention further provides one or two types selected from the group consisting of Al: 0.02% or more and less than 0.5% and Cu: 0.02% or more and less than 0.3% by weight. Additional content or Mo: 0.05% or more and less than 0.8%, further Ca: 0.001% or more and less than 0.03%, B: 0.0002% or more and less than 0.005%, It is a ferritic stainless steel for an engine exhaust member which is excellent in heat resistance, workability, and corrosion resistance at a welded portion.

【0022】本発明では、エンジン排気部材用フェライ
ト系ステンレス鋼を、上記のような成分系で形成するよ
うにしたので、優れた耐熱性及び加工性を持ち、且つ、
従来マフラーに使用されていた17%Cr−0.1%S
i−0.2%Ti−0.8%Mo添加のフェライト系ス
テンレス鋼よりも優れた溶接部の耐食性を同時に有する
ものにすることができる。その結果、エンジン排気系で
は、従来、高温部および低温部で使用材料を区別してい
たが、本発明により統一材料とすることができた。
In the present invention, since the ferritic stainless steel for the engine exhaust member is formed from the above-described component system, it has excellent heat resistance and workability, and
17% Cr-0.1% S conventionally used for mufflers
The corrosion resistance of the welded portion can be simultaneously improved more than the ferritic stainless steel added with i-0.2% Ti-0.8% Mo. As a result, in the engine exhaust system, conventionally, the materials used were distinguished between the high-temperature part and the low-temperature part.

【0023】[0023]

【発明の実施の形態】本発明の実施形態は、フェライト
系ステンレス鋼の各成分元素の含有量を限定するもので
あるので、その限定理由を以下に説明する。単位は、す
べて重量%である。Cは、靭性及び加工性を劣化させる
元素であり、0.02%以上になると、靭性及び加工性
の劣化が顕著となるため、0.02重量%未満に限定す
る。また、良好な靭性及び加工性には、Cの含有量は低
い程良く、0.01%以下が望ましい。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Embodiments of the present invention limit the content of each component element of ferritic stainless steel, and the reasons for the limitation will be described below. All units are% by weight. C is an element that deteriorates toughness and workability. If the content of C is 0.02% or more, the deterioration of toughness and workability becomes remarkable, and thus C is limited to less than 0.02% by weight. For good toughness and workability, the lower the C content, the better, and preferably 0.01% or less.

【0024】Siは、本発明鋼にとって重要な元素の一
つである。図2に示したように、0.03%以下の微量
Tiが添加されている場合、Siを0.8%以上添加す
ることによって、マフラーの溶接部耐食性は著しく向上
し、従来鋼(17%Cr−0.1%Si−0.2%Ti
−0.8%Mo)のレベル以上に達する。これは、溶接
部に生成するスケールが、Si−Nb−Tiによって強
化されたものになり、また、母材の耐食性レベルとの相
違が比較的小さくなることにより、溶接部に腐食が集中
しないため、良好なマフラーの溶接部耐食性を示すもの
と考えられているが、詳細は不明である。
[0024] Si is one of the important elements for the steel of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, when a trace amount of Ti of 0.03% or less is added, by adding 0.8% or more of Si, the weld corrosion resistance of the muffler is significantly improved, and the conventional steel (17% Cr-0.1% Si-0.2% Ti
-0.8% Mo) or higher. This is because the scale generated in the weld is strengthened by Si-Nb-Ti, and since the difference from the corrosion resistance level of the base material is relatively small, corrosion does not concentrate on the weld. It is considered to show good weld corrosion resistance of the muffler, but details are unknown.

【0025】なお、Siが1.6%以上になると、加工
性の劣化が激しいので、1.6%を超えないものとす
る。好ましくは、1.0%以上、1.3%以下である。
Mnは、鋼の脱酸剤として知られているが、過剰な添加
は、MnSを形成し、加工性の低下及び、マフラーの溶
接部耐食性を低下させることから、Mn含有量は0.2
0重量%未満とした。好ましくは、0.15%未満であ
る。低い程好ましい。
When the content of Si is 1.6% or more, the workability is greatly deteriorated, so that the content should not exceed 1.6%. Preferably, it is 1.0% or more and 1.3% or less.
Mn is known as a deoxidizing agent for steel, but excessive addition forms MnS, lowers workability and lowers the corrosion resistance of the muffler at the weld, so that the Mn content is 0.2%.
It was less than 0% by weight. Preferably, it is less than 0.15%. The lower the better, the better.

【0026】Pは、靭性、およびマフラーの溶接部耐食
性を劣化させる元素であり、0.04重量%未満とし
た。Sは、鋼材の伸び及びr−値(ランクフォード値)
を低下させ、加工性を劣化させると共に、ステンレス鋼
の基本特性である耐食性を劣化させる元素であるので、
その含有量を0.02%未満とした。
P is an element that deteriorates the toughness and the corrosion resistance of the muffler at the welded portion, and is set to less than 0.04% by weight. S is the elongation and r-value (Rankford value) of the steel material
As it is an element that reduces the corrosion resistance, which is the basic property of stainless steel,
The content was less than 0.02%.

【0027】Crは、ステンレス鋼の基本特性であある
耐食性を向上させる元素であるが、図1に示したよう
に、マフラーの溶接部耐食性には、多すぎると有害とな
り、かつコスト高になるため、16%未満に制限する。
一方、10%未満の含有量で溶接部耐食性が著しく劣る
ため、10%を下限とする。従って、本発明では、Cr
含有量を10%以上16%未満に限定する。マフラーの
溶接部耐食性にとって、Cr含有量は10%以上12%
以下であることが好ましい。さらに好ましくは、10.
5%を超え11.5%未満である。
Cr is an element that improves the corrosion resistance, which is a basic property of stainless steel. However, as shown in FIG. 1, if it is too much, it becomes harmful to the corrosion resistance of the muffler welded portion and increases the cost. Therefore, it is limited to less than 16%.
On the other hand, if the content is less than 10%, the corrosion resistance of the welded portion is extremely poor, so the lower limit is 10%. Therefore, in the present invention, Cr
The content is limited to 10% or more and less than 16%. Cr content is 10% or more and 12% for the corrosion resistance of the muffler weld
The following is preferred. More preferably, 10.
More than 5% and less than 11.5%.

【0028】Niは、マフラーの溶接部耐食性を向上さ
せる効果があるため、0.05%以上添加する。一方多
量の添加は、フェライト組織を不安定にするため、1%
未満に制限する。好ましくは、0.1%以上0.8%以
下。より好ましくは、0.5%以上0.8%以下であ
る。Nは、鋼の靭性及び加工性を劣化させる元素であ
る。0.02%以上になると靭性及び加工性の劣化が顕
著となるので、0.02%未満に限定する。Nの含有量
は小さいほどよく、0.01%以下であることが望まし
い。
Ni is added in an amount of 0.05% or more because it has the effect of improving the corrosion resistance of the welded portion of the muffler. On the other hand, a large amount of addition makes 1%
Restrict to less than. Preferably, it is 0.1% or more and 0.8% or less. More preferably, it is 0.5% or more and 0.8% or less. N is an element that deteriorates the toughness and workability of steel. If the content is 0.02% or more, the deterioration of toughness and workability becomes remarkable, so the content is limited to less than 0.02%. The smaller the content of N, the better, and preferably 0.01% or less.

【0029】Nbは、高温強度、加工性、マフラーの溶
接部耐食性を高める効果を持つ元素であり、従来鋼以上
の特性を得るため、0.43%以上の添加が必要であ
る。しかしながら、0.6%を超えて添加すると、鋼材
の室温での強度を著しく高め、成形性、加工性を劣化さ
せるため、0.6%を上限とする。好ましくは、0.4
5%を超え、0.6%未満である。さらに好ましくは、
0.5%以上0.6%未満である。
Nb is an element having an effect of improving high-temperature strength, workability, and corrosion resistance of a welded portion of a muffler. To obtain properties higher than those of conventional steel, it is necessary to add 0.43% or more. However, if added in excess of 0.6%, the strength of the steel material at room temperature is significantly increased, and formability and workability are degraded, so the upper limit is 0.6%. Preferably, 0.4
More than 5% and less than 0.6%. More preferably,
0.5% or more and less than 0.6%.

【0030】Tiは、本発明鋼にとって、特に重要な元
素である。表1,表2,表3に示してあるようにマフラ
ーの溶接部耐食性向上のため、Tiレス材(0.001
%以下)では、高Si、低Cr化しても、マフラーの溶
接部耐食性は向上しない(表2のNo.24、28)。
0.002%以上のTiを添加した場合、著しくマフラ
ーの溶接部耐食性が向上した。この理由は、明確ではな
いが、溶接時に発生するスケールの組成を微量Tiが変
化させているのではと考えている。しかしながら、0.
03%以上になると溶接部のマフラー腐食が劣化する。
この理由としては、Tiは、Nb、AlよりもNと結合
しやすく、大気中のNを吸収し易く、過大なTi添加
は、溶接時、大気からC、Nを吸収し、マフラーの溶接
部耐食性を低下させるのではと考えられる。よって、T
i含有量を0.002%以上0.03%未満に限定す
る。好ましくは0.005%以上0.02%以下であ
る。
[0030] Ti is a particularly important element for the steel of the present invention. As shown in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, the Ti-less material (0.001
% Or less), the corrosion resistance of the welded portion of the muffler is not improved even when the Si content and the Cr content are reduced (Nos. 24 and 28 in Table 2).
When 0.002% or more of Ti was added, the corrosion resistance of the muffler at the weld was significantly improved. Although the reason is not clear, it is thought that the trace amount of Ti changes the composition of the scale generated at the time of welding. However, 0.
If it exceeds 03%, muffler corrosion of the welded portion deteriorates.
The reason for this is that Ti is easier to combine with N than Nb and Al and absorbs N in the atmosphere. Excessive addition of Ti absorbs C and N from the atmosphere during welding, and the It is thought that the corrosion resistance is reduced. Therefore, T
The i content is limited to 0.002% or more and less than 0.03%. Preferably it is 0.005% or more and 0.02% or less.

【0031】Alは、任意添加元素である。一般に、鋼
の脱酸剤として不可避的に含有されてしまう場合がある
が、特に悪影響はない。本発明は、Siを含有させるた
め、Al脱酸は任意である。一方、0.02%以上の添
加をした場合、マフラーの溶接部耐食性はさらに向上す
る。この理由は明確ではないが、Alは酸化されやすい
元素であるため、十分なAlの添加は、溶接時、アルミ
ナ被膜により大気中からのC、Nの吸収を防ぐ効果によ
るものと考えられる。従って、マフラー耐食性をさらに
向上させる場合、0.02%以上添加してもよい。しか
し、0.5%以上になると、加工性の劣化が著しいた
め、0.02%以上0.5%未満に限定する。好ましく
は、0.1%を超え0.2%未満である。
Al is an optional additive element. Generally, it may be inevitably contained as a steel deoxidizing agent, but there is no particular adverse effect. In the present invention, Al deoxidation is optional in order to contain Si. On the other hand, when 0.02% or more is added, the corrosion resistance of the muffler at the welded portion is further improved. Although the reason for this is not clear, Al is an element that is easily oxidized, and it is considered that sufficient addition of Al is due to the effect of preventing absorption of C and N from the atmosphere by the alumina coating during welding. Therefore, in order to further improve the muffler corrosion resistance, 0.02% or more may be added. However, when the content is 0.5% or more, the workability is significantly deteriorated. Therefore, the content is limited to 0.02% or more and less than 0.5%. Preferably, it is more than 0.1% and less than 0.2%.

【0032】Cuは、任意添加元素である。0.02%
以上の添加をした場合、溶接部耐食性が向上する。0.
3%以上になると、加工性が劣化するため、本発明で
は、0.02%以上0.3%未満に限定する。なお、好
ましくは、0.15%を超え、0.3%未満である。本
発明は、低コストの省Mo材であっても、従来鋼(17
%Cr−0.1%Si−0.2%Ti−0.8%Mo)
並みのマフラーの溶接部耐食性を得る鋼材として提案さ
れた。
Cu is an optional additive element. 0.02%
When the above addition is performed, the corrosion resistance of the welded portion is improved. 0.
When the content is 3% or more, the workability deteriorates. Therefore, in the present invention, the content is limited to 0.02% or more and less than 0.3%. Preferably, it is more than 0.15% and less than 0.3%. The present invention is applicable to conventional steel (17
% Cr-0.1% Si-0.2% Ti-0.8% Mo)
It has been proposed as a steel material that achieves the same level of corrosion resistance of welds in mufflers.

【0033】一方、Moは、固溶強化元素であり、高温
強度の向上にも有効であり、その添加効果は、0.05
%から現れる。従って、本発明でも、より高温強度を高
めたい場合、0.05%以上添加しても良い。しかしな
がら、Moは、高価な元素であり、コスト高を招くとと
もに、図2のように、マフラーの溶接部耐食性への効果
は殆ど見られない。したがって、本発明では、0.8%
未満に限定する。
On the other hand, Mo is a solid solution strengthening element, and is also effective for improving the high temperature strength.
Appears from%. Therefore, even in the present invention, when it is desired to increase the high-temperature strength, 0.05% or more may be added. However, Mo is an expensive element, which causes an increase in cost, and has almost no effect on the weld corrosion resistance of the muffler as shown in FIG. Therefore, in the present invention, 0.8%
Limited to less than.

【0034】Caは、溶鋼からスラブへの鋳造時におい
て、Ti系介在物によるノズル詰まりを抑制する効果を
有する元素である。その効果は、0.001%から現れ
る。しかしながら、0.03重量%を超えて添加して
も、該効果が飽和するばかりでなく、Caを含む介在物
が孔食の起点となり、耐食性が劣化するため、0.03
%未満とする。
Ca is an element having an effect of suppressing nozzle clogging due to Ti-based inclusions during casting from molten steel to a slab. The effect appears from 0.001%. However, even if it is added in excess of 0.03% by weight, not only the effect is saturated, but also Ca-containing inclusions become the starting point of pitting corrosion and the corrosion resistance deteriorates.
%.

【0035】Bは、鋼材の加工性向上に有効である。そ
の効果は、0.0002%から現れるが、0.005%
を超えると、多量のBNの生成により靭性が劣化するの
で、0.005%未満とする。
B is effective for improving the workability of the steel material. The effect appears from 0.0002%, but 0.005%
If it exceeds, the toughness deteriorates due to the generation of a large amount of BN, so the content is made less than 0.005%.

【0036】[0036]

【実施例】【Example】

(実施例1)表1及び表2に示す成分組成からなる本発
明鋼と比較鋼とを溶製したのち、1250℃に加熱後、
熱間圧延により5mm厚の熱延板とした。これを焼鈍、
酸洗、冷間圧延、仕上焼鈍、酸洗を順次行い、2mm厚
みの冷延焼鈍鋼板とした。
(Example 1) After melting the steel of the present invention having the composition shown in Tables 1 and 2 and a comparative steel, heating to 1250 ° C,
A hot-rolled sheet having a thickness of 5 mm was formed by hot rolling. Annealing this,
Pickling, cold rolling, finish annealing, and pickling were sequentially performed to obtain a cold-rolled annealed steel sheet having a thickness of 2 mm.

【0037】かくして得られた冷延焼鈍鋼板から採取し
た試料について、以下に示す方法により高温強度、室温
の加工性及び母材とマフラーの溶接部耐食性の評価を行
った。
The samples obtained from the cold-rolled annealed steel sheets thus obtained were evaluated for the high-temperature strength, the workability at room temperature, and the corrosion resistance of the weld between the base material and the muffler by the following methods.

【0038】[0038]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0039】[0039]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0040】(1)高温強度 板厚2mmの板状試験片を用いて、0.3%/分の引張
速度で0.2%耐力を測定した。高温強度の評価は、下
記指数で行った(例えば、AAは優、Aは良、Bは普
通、Cは可)。 18MPa以上をAA 15MPa以上18MPa未満をA 10MPa以上15MPa未満をB 10MPa未満をC とする。
(1) High Temperature Strength A 0.2% proof stress was measured at a tensile rate of 0.3% / min using a plate-like test piece having a thickness of 2 mm. The high-temperature strength was evaluated by the following index (for example, AA is excellent, A is good, B is normal, and C is acceptable). 18 MPa or more is AA 15 MPa or more but less than 18 MPa A 10 MPa or more and less than 15 MPa B is less than 10 MPa C 2.

【0041】(2)室温の加工性 延びは、圧延方向に対して、0°、45°、90°方向
のJIS 13号に規定されたB形状の引張試験片(板
厚2mm)で測定し、El={El(0°)+2×El
(45°)+El(90°)}/4の式で算出した。そ
の評価は、前記同様に指数化して行う。
(2) Workability at room temperature The elongation was measured with a B-shaped tensile test piece (plate thickness 2 mm) defined in JIS No. 13 at 0 °, 45 °, and 90 ° directions with respect to the rolling direction. , El = {El (0 °) + 2 × El
(45 °) + El (90 °)} / 4. The evaluation is performed by indexing in the same manner as described above.

【0042】35%以上をA 35%未満をB (3)溶接部のマフラー耐食性 溶接は、板厚2mm材に対しビードオン方式のTIG溶
接を行った。溶接条件は、 溶接速度:600mm/min 溶接電流:200アンペア シールドガス:Arガス、15リッター/min(表面
のみ) である。
(A) Muffler corrosion resistance of the welded portion The bead-on type TIG welding was performed on a 2 mm-thick material. The welding conditions were: welding speed: 600 mm / min, welding current: 200 amps, shielding gas: Ar gas, 15 liter / min (surface only).

【0043】50mm×100mm角の試料を、図3に
示したように、ビーカ1内に吊り下げ、繰り返し蒸発試
験を行い、最大浸食深さ5点の平均を評価した。なお、
試料は、溶接後の鋼材(又は母材)を400℃×5時間
熱処理したものである。また、試験は、該試料を図3に
示すように、80℃に保持した試験溶液中に浸漬し、該
溶液が空になるまで蒸発させることを1サイクルとし、
これを10回繰り返すことで行った。使用した試験溶液
の組成は、マフラー環境をシミュレートするため(単位
は,ppm), Cl:250、NO2 -:100、NO3 -:20、CO3
2- :2000、SO3 2-:1250、SO4 2-:12
50、CH3 COO- :400、HCHO 250、H
COO- :100, pH:8.5 とした。
As shown in FIG. 3, a 50 mm × 100 mm square sample was suspended in the beaker 1 and repeatedly subjected to an evaporation test to evaluate an average of five maximum erosion depths. In addition,
The sample was obtained by heat-treating a steel material (or base metal) after welding at 400 ° C. for 5 hours. In addition, as shown in FIG. 3, the test was performed by immersing the sample in a test solution maintained at 80 ° C. and evaporating the solution until it became empty, as one cycle.
This was repeated 10 times. The composition of the test solution used, (the unit, ppm) for simulating the muffler environment, Cl: 250, NO 2 - : 100, NO 3 -: 20, CO 3
2-: 2000, SO 3 2-: 1250, SO 4 2-: 12
50, CH 3 COO : 400, HCHO 250, H
COO -: 100, pH: was 8.5.

【0044】(4)母材部のマフラー腐食性 溶接部の試験片の変わりに、母材を使用して、(3)と
同様なマフラー耐食性試験を行った。最大浸食深さ5点
の平均を以下のように記号で分類し,評価した。 0.1mm以上0.2mm未満をA 0.2mm以上0.3mm未満をB 0.3mm以上0.4mm未満をC とする。
(4) Muffler Corrosion of Base Material A muffler corrosion test similar to that of (3) was performed using a base material instead of the test piece of the welded portion. The average of the five maximum erosion depths was classified and evaluated as follows, and evaluated. 0.1 mm or more and less than 0.2 mm are A and 0.2 mm or more and less than 0.3 mm are B and 0.3 mm or more and less than 0.4 mm are C.

【0045】これらの試験結果を表3にまとめて示す。The results of these tests are summarized in Table 3.

【0046】[0046]

【表3】 [Table 3]

【0047】表3によれば、比較鋼17は、Siが低過
ぎ、マフラーの溶接部耐食性がSUH409 L並みに
悪い。比較鋼18は、Siが多すぎるため、加工性が悪
い。比較鋼19は、Tiが過剰に含有されているため、
マフラーの溶接部耐食性がSUS436 LTより悪
い。比較鋼20は、Mnが過剰で、マフラーの溶接部耐
食性がSUS436 LTより悪い。比較鋼21は、N
b、Tiが過剰のため、加工性、マフラーの溶接部耐食
性、いずれも悪い。比較鋼22は、Niが過剰であるた
め、加工性が悪い。比較鋼23は、Nbが過小のため、
高温強度、マフラーの溶接部耐食性、いずれも悪い。比
較鋼24は、Tiが過小のため、マフラーの溶接部耐食
性が悪い。比較鋼25は、Pが過大であり、母材及びマ
フラーの溶接部耐食性が、悪い。比較鋼26は、SUH
409 Lであり、高温強度、母材及びマフラーの溶接
部耐食性いずれも悪い。比較鋼27は、SUS436
LTであり、加工性、マフラーの溶接部耐食性いずれも
悪い、比較鋼28は、SUS430 J1Lであり、マ
フラーの溶接部耐食性が悪い。
According to Table 3, the comparative steel 17 has too low Si and the weld corrosion resistance of the muffler is as poor as SUH409L. Since the comparative steel 18 has too much Si, the workability is poor. Comparative steel 19 contains excessive Ti,
The weld corrosion resistance of the muffler is worse than SUS436 LT. Comparative steel 20 has an excessive amount of Mn, and the weld corrosion resistance of the muffler is lower than SUS436 LT. Comparative steel 21 is N
Since b and Ti are excessive, both the workability and the corrosion resistance of the muffler weld are poor. The workability of the comparative steel 22 is poor because Ni is excessive. In Comparative Steel 23, since Nb was too small,
Both high-temperature strength and corrosion resistance of muffler welds are poor. The comparative steel 24 has poor corrosion resistance at the welded portion of the muffler because Ti is too small. Comparative steel 25 has an excessively large P, and has poor corrosion resistance at the welded portions of the base metal and the muffler. Comparative steel 26 is SUH
409 L, and the high-temperature strength, and the corrosion resistance of the base material and the muffler at the weld zone are all poor. Comparative steel 27 is SUS436
Comparative steel 28 is SUS430 J1L, which is LT, and has poor workability and poor muffler weld corrosion resistance.

【0048】一方、本発明鋼1〜16は、高温強度は、
現行材(SUS430 JIL)以上の値を示し、かつ
マフラーの溶接部耐食性も現行材(SUS436 L
T)以上の優れた特性を示す。さらに加工性も、現行材
(SUS430 J1L、SUS436 LT)以上の
特性であり、さらに、低Cr、省Mo鋼であるので、よ
り安価である。母材のマフラー耐食性は、SUS436
LTより劣ってはいるが、Bランク以上のレベル、即
ち、0.3mm以下の軽微な腐食レベルであり、SUS
436 LTの溶接部の値より優れており、SUS43
6 LT製のマフラーより優れていると判断できる。な
ぜなら、最も腐食の激しい位置が問題になるからであ
る。
On the other hand, the steels 1 to 16 of the present invention have high-temperature strengths as follows:
It shows a value equal to or higher than the current material (SUS430 JIL), and the corrosion resistance of the muffler welded part is the same as the current material (SUS436 L).
T) It shows excellent properties as described above. Further, the workability is more than that of the current materials (SUS430 J1L, SUS436 LT), and furthermore, it is lower in cost because it is a low Cr and Mo saving steel. The muffler corrosion resistance of the base material is SUS436
Although it is inferior to LT, it has a level of B or higher, that is, a slight corrosion level of 0.3 mm or less.
436 LT better than the weld value, SUS43
It can be judged that it is superior to the 6LT muffler. This is because the location of the most severe corrosion becomes a problem.

【0049】以上のように、本発明に係るフェライト系
ステンレス鋼は、自動車排気系の中の現在使用中の高温
用部材(SUS430 J1L)並み以上の耐熱性、現
在使用中の低温用部材(SUS436 LT)以上のマ
フラー耐食性、さらに、両者以上の加工性を兼ね備え、
その上、これらよりも、低Cr、省Moであり安価であ
ることがわかる。
As described above, the ferritic stainless steel according to the present invention has heat resistance equal to or higher than that of a currently used high-temperature member (SUS430 J1L) in an automobile exhaust system, and a low-temperature member (SUS436) currently used. LT) and more than muffler corrosion resistance, and also more than both processability,
In addition, it can be seen that they are lower in Cr, less in Mo, and inexpensive.

【0050】[0050]

【発明の効果】以上述べたように、本発明により、耐熱
性、加工性及び溶接部耐食性に優れたエンジン排気部材
用フェライト系ステンレス鋼を安価に提供することが可
能となる。すなわち、省Mo−低Cr材であっても、従
来材以上の耐熱性、及びマフラー耐食性を得ることがで
きる。従って、高温強度や酸化性、耐食性が要求される
自動車エンジンのエキゾースト・マニホールド、フロン
ト・パイプ、コンバータの外筒、センター・パイプ、マ
フラー等のいずれの部材に採用しても、従来材以上の特
性を持ち、さらに安価である。また、火力発電システム
の排気経路部材も、自動車エンジン排気部材と同様な特
性が要求されるため、本発明鋼の用途に適している。
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to provide inexpensively ferritic stainless steel for an engine exhaust member having excellent heat resistance, workability, and corrosion resistance at a welded portion. That is, even if the Mo-low Cr material is used, heat resistance and muffler corrosion resistance higher than conventional materials can be obtained. Therefore, even if it is used for exhaust manifolds, front pipes, outer tubes of converters, center pipes, mufflers, etc. of automobile engines that require high-temperature strength, oxidizing properties, and corrosion resistance, the properties are superior to those of conventional materials. And even cheaper. Further, the exhaust path member of the thermal power generation system is required to have the same characteristics as the exhaust member of the automobile engine, and thus is suitable for the use of the steel of the present invention.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】鋼材マフラーの溶接部耐食性に及ぼすCrの添
加効果を示す図である(但し、ベース鋼材を0.5%N
b−0.02%Ti−1.2%Si系としてある)。
FIG. 1 is a view showing the effect of adding Cr on the corrosion resistance of a welded portion of a steel muffler (however, the base steel material is 0.5% N
b-0.02% Ti-1.2% Si based).

【図2】母材及びマフラーの溶接部耐食性に及ぼすS
i,あるいはMoの添加効果を示す図である。
FIG. 2 shows the effect of S on the corrosion resistance of the base material and the muffler in the weld zone.
It is a figure which shows the addition effect of i or Mo.

【図3】マフラー腐食試験を実施する装置例を示す図で
ある。
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of an apparatus for performing a muffler corrosion test.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 ビーカ 2 80℃の水 3 試験溶液 4 溶接部 5 恒温槽 6 蒸発方向 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Beaker 2 80 degreeC water 3 Test solution 4 Weld part 5 Constant temperature bath 6 Evaporation direction

フロントページの続き (72)発明者 石井 和秀 千葉市中央区川崎町1番地 川崎製鉄株式 会社技術研究所内 (72)発明者 佐藤 進 千葉市中央区川崎町1番地 川崎製鉄株式 会社技術研究所内Continued on the front page (72) Inventor Kazuhide Ishii 1 Kawasaki-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Kawasaki Steel Engineering Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Susumu Sato 1 Kawasaki-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Kawasaki Steel Co., Ltd.

Claims (4)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 重量%で、 C:0.02%未満、 Si:0.8%以上、1.6%未満、 Mn:0.20%未満、 P:0.04%未満、 S:0.02%未満、 Cr:10%以上、16%未満、 Ni:0.05%以上、1.0%未満、 N:0.02%未満、 Ti:0.002%以上、0.03%未満、 Nb:0.43%以上、0.6%未満、 を含有し、残部Fe及び不可避的不純物からなる、耐熱
性、加工性及び溶接部耐食性に優れたエンジン排気部材
用フェライト系ステンレス鋼。
1. In weight%, C: less than 0.02%, Si: 0.8% or more and less than 1.6%, Mn: less than 0.20%, P: less than 0.04%, S: 0 0.02%, Cr: 10% or more, less than 16%, Ni: 0.05% or more, less than 1.0%, N: less than 0.02%, Ti: 0.002% or more, less than 0.03% , Nb: 0.43% or more and less than 0.6%, and comprising a balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities, and having excellent heat resistance, workability, and corrosion resistance at welded portions, for engine exhaust members.
【請求項2】 さらに、重量%で、 Al:0.02%以上0.5%未満 Cu:0.02%以上0.3%未満 のうちから選んだ1種又は2種を追加含有させることを
特徴とする請求項1記載の耐熱性、加工性及び溶接部耐
食性に優れたエンジン排気部材用フェライト系ステンレ
ス鋼。
2. In addition, one or two selected from the following: Al: 0.02% or more and less than 0.5%, Cu: 0.02% or more and less than 0.3% by weight. The ferritic stainless steel for an engine exhaust member according to claim 1, which is excellent in heat resistance, workability, and weld corrosion resistance.
【請求項3】 さらに、重量%で、 Mo:0.05%以上0.8%未満 を追加含有させることを特徴とする請求項1又は2記載
の耐熱性、加工性及び溶接部耐食性に優れたエンジン排
気部材用フェライト系ステンレス鋼。
3. The composition according to claim 1, further comprising Mo: 0.05% or more and less than 0.8% by weight. Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust parts.
【請求項4】 さらに、重量%で、 Ca:0.001%以上0.03%未満、 B:0.0002%以上、0.005%未満、 を追加含有させることを特徴とする請求項1〜3いずれ
か記載の耐熱性、加工性及び溶接部耐食性に優れたエン
ジン排気部材用フェライト系ステンレス鋼。
4. The composition according to claim 1, further comprising, by weight%, Ca: 0.001% or more and less than 0.03%, and B: 0.0002% or more and less than 0.005%. 4. A ferritic stainless steel for an engine exhaust member having excellent heat resistance, workability, and corrosion resistance at a weld portion according to any one of (1) to (3).
JP25329996A 1996-09-25 1996-09-25 Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust members with excellent heat resistance, workability, and weld corrosion resistance Expired - Fee Related JP3713833B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP25329996A JP3713833B2 (en) 1996-09-25 1996-09-25 Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust members with excellent heat resistance, workability, and weld corrosion resistance

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP25329996A JP3713833B2 (en) 1996-09-25 1996-09-25 Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust members with excellent heat resistance, workability, and weld corrosion resistance

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH10102208A true JPH10102208A (en) 1998-04-21
JP3713833B2 JP3713833B2 (en) 2005-11-09

Family

ID=17249365

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP25329996A Expired - Fee Related JP3713833B2 (en) 1996-09-25 1996-09-25 Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust members with excellent heat resistance, workability, and weld corrosion resistance

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3713833B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008240121A (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-09 Jfe Steel Kk Ferritic stainless steel for exhaust expansion members with excellent spinning processability
JP2012112020A (en) * 2010-11-26 2012-06-14 Jfe Steel Corp Ferritic stainless steel sheet and ferritic stainless steel pipe for automotive exhaust system parts
JP2016050320A (en) * 2014-08-28 2016-04-11 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 Stainless steel excellent in formic acid resistance

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5234214B2 (en) 2011-10-14 2013-07-10 Jfeスチール株式会社 Ferritic stainless steel

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008240121A (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-09 Jfe Steel Kk Ferritic stainless steel for exhaust expansion members with excellent spinning processability
JP2012112020A (en) * 2010-11-26 2012-06-14 Jfe Steel Corp Ferritic stainless steel sheet and ferritic stainless steel pipe for automotive exhaust system parts
JP2016050320A (en) * 2014-08-28 2016-04-11 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 Stainless steel excellent in formic acid resistance

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3713833B2 (en) 2005-11-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11230756B2 (en) Ferritic stainless steel
KR102154579B1 (en) Ferrite-austenite two-phase stainless steel and manufacturing method thereof
US9279172B2 (en) Heat-resistance ferritic stainless steel
JP5186769B2 (en) Sulfuric acid dew-point corrosion steel
JP5297630B2 (en) Ferritic stainless steel plate with excellent heat resistance
CN101250672A (en) Ferritic stainless steel and welded steel tubes for automotive exhaust duct components
JP2008189974A (en) Ferritic stainless steel for exhaust gas path members
JP3536567B2 (en) Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust components with excellent heat resistance, workability and muffler corrosion resistance
JPWO2017171049A1 (en) Welded structural members
JP3536568B2 (en) Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust parts with excellent heat resistance and muffler corrosion resistance at welds
JPH11236650A (en) Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust components with excellent workability, intergranular corrosion resistance and high-temperature strength
JP5428396B2 (en) Ferritic stainless steel with excellent heat resistance and weldability
JP3713833B2 (en) Ferritic stainless steel for engine exhaust members with excellent heat resistance, workability, and weld corrosion resistance
JP5786491B2 (en) Ferritic stainless steel for EGR cooler
JP2007247013A (en) Ferritic stainless steel with excellent oxidation resistance, workability and high temperature strength
KR102389026B1 (en) Ferritic stainless steel
KR20240000556A (en) Ferritic stainless steel
JP2023070284A (en) ferritic stainless steel
JP2009235572A (en) Ferritic stainless steel having excellent heat resistance and shape-fixability
JPH03229819A (en) Manufacturing method of composite steel plate with excellent corrosion resistance
JP3527458B2 (en) Cladding steel and chimney for the inner cylinder of a coal-fired power plant with excellent corrosion resistance at the weld zone
JP2001234276A (en) Cr-Mo steel with high toughness and excellent reheat cracking resistance
JPH05163529A (en) Method for producing multi-layer welded steel pipe with excellent high temperature corrosion resistance
JPH05163554A (en) Line pipe excellent in corrosion resistance and weldability
JP2004043964A (en) Chromium-containing steel for automobiles with excellent intergranular corrosion resistance in welds

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20040622

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20040803

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20041004

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20050802

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20050815

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080902

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090902

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090902

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100902

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100902

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110902

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110902

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120902

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120902

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130902

Year of fee payment: 8

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees