JPH0619391A - Method for designing plan of two-family house - Google Patents
Method for designing plan of two-family houseInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0619391A JPH0619391A JP4176660A JP17666092A JPH0619391A JP H0619391 A JPH0619391 A JP H0619391A JP 4176660 A JP4176660 A JP 4176660A JP 17666092 A JP17666092 A JP 17666092A JP H0619391 A JPH0619391 A JP H0619391A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- type
- household
- family
- types
- parent
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Instructional Devices (AREA)
- Residential Or Office Buildings (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、二世帯住宅を設計する
場合において、同居する親世帯と子世帯の描いている理
想の状態を、イエスノーチヤートにより明らかにして、
最適間取設計を行う方法に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention clarifies the ideal state of a parent household and a child household living together when designing a two-family house by using Yes No Chart,
The present invention relates to a method for performing an optimal floor plan design.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来から、二世帯住宅は公知とされてい
るのである。しかし、最近の家族事情と住宅事情の変化
により、従来よりも更に、二世帯住宅の建設が促進され
る傾向がある。しかし、該二世帯住宅は、一世帯の場合
と相違して、入居後において、親世帯が描いていた理想
や、子世帯が描いていた理想との相違が明らかとなり、
間取りの欠点が問題となる可能性が高い。2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, two-family houses have been known. However, due to recent changes in family and housing conditions, the construction of two-family houses tends to be promoted more than ever before. However, unlike the case of a single household, the difference between the two-family house and the ideal drawn by the parent household and the child household became clear after moving in.
The flaws in the floor plan are likely to be a problem.
【0003】[0003]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】二世帯住宅において
は、それぞれの親世帯と子世帯により、その生活の重複
可能度は微妙に相違しており、簡単な聞き取りだけでは
十分に両世帯の潜在的な要望や不満等を確実に聞き取る
ことが出来ず、また、場当たり的な聞き取りだけでは質
問する側の資質により、当たり外れが多いという不具合
があったのである。本発明においては、質問者が誰であ
っても、十分に両世帯の意見を聞き出すことが出来て最
良の型が選択出来るように構成したものである。[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] In a two-family house, there is a subtle difference in the degree of possible overlap of life depending on the parent and child households, and a simple interview is sufficient for the potential of both households. There was a problem that it was not possible to reliably hear such requests and dissatisfactions, and that there were many missed hits due to the qualities of the person asking the question only by ad hoc hearing. In the present invention, it is configured such that no matter who the questioner is, the opinions of both households can be sufficiently heard and the best type can be selected.
【0004】[0004]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の解決しようとす
る課題は以上の如くであり、次に該課題を解決する為の
手段を説明する。即ち、同居する親世帯と子世帯の生活
重複度により、「生活共同型」と「食生活独立型」と
「生活独立型」の3つの型に分類し、該3種類の型に至
るイエスノーチヤートを親世帯用と子世帯用の2種類設
け、親世帯と子世帯の別々に該イエスノーチヤートに沿
って選択し、上記3型の中から親世帯に最適な型と、子
世帯に最適な型を選択し、次に選択した型が一致しない
場合に、その不一致点を親世帯と子世帯の両方で検討し
最適な型を選択するものである。The problems to be solved by the present invention are as described above. Next, the means for solving the problems will be described. In other words, according to the degree of overlap of living between the parent household and the child household living together, it is classified into three types of "living common type", "dietary independent type" and "living independent type", and the three types of Yes No Chart There are two types for parent households and child households, and the parent household and the child household are selected separately according to the Yes No Chart, and among the above 3 types, the optimal type for the parent household and the optimal type for the child household When the selected type does not match, the mismatch point is examined in both the parent household and the child household, and the optimal type is selected.
【0005】[0005]
【作用】次に作用を説明する。二世帯を設計する場合に
おいては、設計者はまず親世帯と子世帯の両者から、イ
エスノーチヤートに沿った形式通りの聞取りを行うので
ある。子世帯のイエスノーチヤートの「選択質問」は1
2項目あり、親世帯の「選択質問」も12項目ある。こ
れらの「選択質問」は、考えれば当たり前のような項目
であるが、実際に本人にこの質問を投げ掛けると意外な
返事となって戻ってくることがあるので、必ず「選択質
問」の項目を省略することなく行い、また返事も質問者
が与えるのではなくて本人の明確な判断の元に、イエス
ノーの返事を得ることとする。これにより、質問者が思
い込みで下した結論とは相当に相違する生活重複度の要
望と実際が、型の選択結果として表れるのである。両世
帯の選択結果が一致するか、又は近い場合には調整が簡
単であるが、全く相違する型である「生活共同型」と
「生活独立型」とが結果として出た場合には、両世帯の
徹底的な話合いが必要となるのである。[Operation] Next, the operation will be described. When designing two households, the designer first listens to both the parent and child households in a formal manner in accordance with Yes No Chart. Yes No Chart for child households has a “choice question” of 1
There are 2 items, and there are 12 items for the “selection question” of the parent household. These "choice questions" are, of course, obvious items, but if you actually ask this question to yourself, it may come back as an unexpected reply, so be sure to select the "choice question" item. Do not omit it, and do not give the answer by the questioner, but get the answer of Yesno based on the clear judgment of the person himself. As a result, the request and reality of the degree of life overlap, which is significantly different from the conclusion the questioner has made, appears as the type selection result. If the selection results of both households are the same or close to each other, adjustment is easy, but if there are completely different types of "living-community type" and "living-independent type", the Thorough discussions between households are required.
【0006】[0006]
【実施例】次に実施例を説明する。図1は本発明の二世
帯住宅の3つの型である、「生活共同型」と「食生活独
立型」と「生活独立型」を示す図面、図2は生活重複度
により分離した「生活共同型」と「食生活独立型」と
「生活独立型」の、プライベートスペースとパブリック
スペースの重複度合いを示す図面、図3は図1に於ける
各スペースと共有要素の記号を示す図面、図4は親世帯
のイエスノーチヤート、図5は子世帯のイエスノーチヤ
ートを示す図面である。EXAMPLES Next, examples will be described. FIG. 1 is a drawing showing three types of two-family house of the present invention, “communal living type”, “dietary independent type” and “living independent type”, and FIG. “Type”, “Dietary Independent Type”, and “Life Independent Type” showing the degree of overlap between the private space and public space. FIG. 3 is a drawing showing the symbols of each space and shared elements in FIG. 1, FIG. Is a parent household Yes No chart, and FIG. 5 is a child household Yes No chart.
【0007】本発明は親世帯と子世帯の聞取り調査に基
づいて、柔軟な設計を可能とするものである。一口に二
世帯同居といっても、その形は実にさまざまであり、一
概に決定することは出来ないのである。そこで、各世帯
毎に、親世帯と子世帯がどう交流し、どう独立するかに
同居のポイントをおいて、生活重複度の型を「生活共同
型」と「食生活独立型」と「生活独立型」のどれかに分
類せんとするのである。The present invention enables flexible design based on a hearing survey of a parent household and a child household. Even if two households live together in one bite, their shapes are so different that they cannot be decided unequivocally. Therefore, for each household, depending on how the parent and child households interact with each other and how they become independent, the type of degree of living overlap is "community-based", "dietary-independent", and "life". It is classified as one of the "independent types."
【0008】また上記3つの型「生活共同型」と「食生
活共同型」と「生活独立型」は、図1の如く、5つの小
さなタイプに分類することが可能である。即ち、「生活
共同型」は「共用タイプ」、また「食生活独立型」は
「キッチン独立タイプ」、また「生活独立型」は「浴室
独立タイプ」と「玄関独立タイプ」である。唯、「ミニ
キッチンタイプ」が、「生活共同型」と「食生活共同
型」の両方に跨がっている。[0008] The above three types of "living-community type", "food-living-community type" and "living-independent type" can be classified into five small types as shown in FIG. That is, the "communal living type" is a "common type", the "dietary independent type" is a "kitchen independent type", and the "living independent type" is a "bathroom independent type" and an "entrance independent type". However, the "mini-kitchen type" spans both the "living-community type" and the "diet-living type".
【0009】本発明においては、図1に示す如く、「共
用タイプ」は、「共用ゾーンF」に「玄関」と「キッチ
ン」と「浴室」が配置されており、親世帯も子世帯も同
じものを使うのである。「ミニキッチンタイプ」は、
「親世帯ゾーンP」に「ミニキッチン」を配置し、「共
用ゾーンF」に、「玄関」と「キッチン独立タイプ」と
「浴室」を配置していく。「ミニキッチン」だけが別に
配置されているのである。In the present invention, as shown in FIG. 1, the "common type" has the "entrance", the "kitchen" and the "bathroom" arranged in the "common zone F", and the parent household and the child household are the same. Use things. "Mini kitchen type" is
The "mini-kitchen" will be placed in the "parent household zone P", and the "entrance", "kitchen independent type", and "bathroom" will be placed in the "common zone F". Only the "mini kitchen" is placed separately.
【0010】「キッチン独立タイプ」においては、「共
用ゾーンF」には「浴室」と「玄関」を配置しており、
「キッチン」は「親世帯ゾーンP」と「子世帯ゾーン
C」に別々に配置している。また「浴室独立タイプ」
は、「共用ゾーンF」には「玄関」のみを配置し、「親
世帯ゾーンP」と「子世帯ゾーンC」のどちらにも,別
々に「浴室」と「キッチン」を配置しているのである。
「玄関独立タイプ」は、「共用ゾーンF」が無く、「親
世帯ゾーンP」と「子世帯ゾーンC」のみであり、それ
ぞれに「玄関」と「キッチン」と「浴室」を配置してい
るのである。In the "kitchen independent type", "bathroom" and "entrance" are arranged in "common zone F",
The “kitchen” is separately arranged in the “parent household zone P” and the “child household zone C”. Also "bathroom independent type"
Has only the "entrance" in the "common zone F", and has the "bathroom" and "kitchen" separately in both the "parent household zone P" and the "child household zone C". is there.
The "entrance independent type" does not have "common zone F" but only "parent household zone P" and "child household zone C", and has "entrance", "kitchen" and "bathroom" respectively. Of.
【0011】図2において示す如く、前記「生活独立
型」と「食生活共同型」と「生活独立型」に分けた場合
には、親世帯のプライベートスペースと、パブリックス
ペースと、子世帯のプライベートスペースの重複度が変
化するのである。「生活独立型」においては、殆どパブ
リックスペースが無くなり、「生活共同型」において
は、親世帯と子世帯の生活の半分程度が重複するのであ
る。As shown in FIG. 2, when divided into the "living independent type", the "dietary lifestyle type", and the "living independent type", the private space of the parent household, the public space, and the private space of the child household. The degree of overlap of spaces changes. In the "living-independent type", there is almost no public space, and in the "living-independent type", about half of the lives of the parent and child households overlap.
【0012】図4において、親世帯の選択を行うイエス
ノーチヤートについて説明する。親世帯は夫婦元気な場
合には、二人で検討しながら、この「選択質問」に対し
て、「YES」「NO」のどちらかの結論を出しなが
ら、選択肢にそってチャートを進んで行くのである。そ
して該親世帯のイエスノーチヤートにおける「選択質
問」は次の12項目である。「現在同居している。」
「親子が同居するのは、当然だと思う。」「親子でも、
家計は分けるべきだ。」「ご夫婦とも健康には自信があ
る。」「二世帯同居では、それぞれ世帯単位の生活を第
一に考えたい。」「食事は好みも時間帯も違うので、別
々にしたい。」「子世帯とは生活の好みもリズムも違
う。」「子供や孫とにぎやかに暮らしたい。」「ご両親
にとっては息子夫婦である。」「親戚との付き合いは積
極的に行いたい。」「洗濯はそれぞれ別々にしたい。」
「元気なうちは自立して生活すべきである。」の各項目
に従って進む。Referring to FIG. 4, the yes-no-chart for selecting a parent household will be described. When the parent household is cheerful with the couple, the two go through the chart according to the options while considering the two choices and making a conclusion of either "YES" or "NO" for this "question." Of. The “choice question” in the parent household's Yes No Chart is the following 12 items. "I'm living together now."
"I think it's natural that parents and children live together."
The household should be divided. "I am confident that my husband and wife are in good health.""When living with two households, I would like to think about the life of each household first.""Different tastes and different time zones, so I would like to have separate meals.""Child The taste and rhythm of life is different from that of households. "" I want to live a lively life with my children and grandchildren. "" My parents are my son's couple. "" I want to actively engage with my relatives. "" Washing I want to keep them separate. "
Proceed according to each item in "You should live independently while you are fine."
【0013】図5においては、子世帯の選択を行うイエ
スノーチヤートについて説明する。子世帯の「選択質
問」も、12項目である。「現在同居している。」「現
在一緒に食事している。」「親子でも家計は分けるべき
だ。」「親世帯が住んでいる土地に二世帯住宅を建てる
予定だ。」「二世帯住宅ではそれぞれ世帯単位の生活を
第1に考えたい。」「食事は好みも時間帯も違うので別
々にしたい。」「奥さまは、町内や隣近所との付き合い
を大切にしたい。」「掃除や子育てなど親世帯に協力し
てもらいたい。」「ご両親にとって息子夫婦である。」
「奥さまは専業主婦。」「洗濯はそれぞれ別々にした
い。」の各項目に従って進む。Referring to FIG. 5, a description will be given of an answer chart for selecting a child household. There are 12 “choice questions” for child households. "I'm living together now.""I'm currently eating together.""Parents and children should share their household budget.""Plan to build a two-family house on the land where the parent's household lives.""Two-family house So first of all, I want to think about the life of each household. ”“ I want to have different meals because the tastes and times are different. ”“ My wife wants to value the relationship with the neighborhood and the neighborhood. ”“ Cleaning and raising children I would like parents to cooperate with me. "" My parents are my son's couple. "
Proceed according to each item of "My wife is a full-time housewife.""I want to do separate laundry."
【0014】そして、親世帯と子世帯とが別々にイエス
ノーチヤートによる生活重複度の選択を終了した後で、
両世帯の相違を比較対照し、どこからその相違点が発生
するかを、逆に各「選択質問」を逆流して検討するので
ある。その中から、両世帯の納得できる妥協点を捜しだ
して、「生活共同型」と「食生活独立型」と「生活独立
型」の中のどれかを決定するのである。該型の決定後
は、敷地の広さと形状等から、型にあった設計図面を作
成する。Then, after the parent household and the child household have individually completed the selection of the degree of life overlap by Yes No Chart,
The differences between the two households are compared and contrasted, and the origin of the differences is examined by conversely reversing each "choice question". From among them, a convincing compromise between both households is sought, and one of the "community-based", "dietary-independent" and "living-independent" is decided. After deciding the type, design drawings suitable for the type are created from the size and shape of the site.
【0015】[0015]
【発明の効果】本発明は以上の如く構成したので、次の
ような効果を奏するのである。即ち、二世帯住宅の場合
には、それぞれのケースによりその生活重複度が相違し
ており、型通りの設計を行うと、完工後においてトラブ
ルの発生の可能性が高いのである。その原因は十分に親
世帯と子世帯の意見と要望を聞き出していないことから
発生するのである。本発明においては、イエスノーチヤ
ートに沿って質問をすることが出来るので、質問者のレ
ベルによる聞き漏らしが発生しないのである。故に、十
分に両世帯の考え型を設計前に聞き出すことが出来るの
で、完工後に共同生活を始めてから、問題が発生するこ
とが少ないのである。Since the present invention is constructed as described above, it has the following effects. In other words, in the case of a two-family house, the degree of overlap in life differs depending on the case, and if a standard design is performed, there is a high possibility that trouble will occur after the completion of construction. The reason for this is that they have not fully heard the opinions and requests of parent and child households. In the present invention, since the question can be asked along the yes-no chart, the omission depending on the level of the questioner does not occur. Therefore, the idea type of both households can be sufficiently heard before the design, and there are few problems after starting the communal life after the completion of construction.
【図1】本発明の二世帯住宅の3つの型である、「生活
共同型」と「食生活独立型」と「生活独立型」を示す図
面。FIG. 1 is a diagram showing three types of a two-family house of the present invention, namely, “communal living type”, “dietary independent type” and “living independent type”.
【図2】生活重複度により分離した「生活共同型」と
「食生活独立型」と「生活独立型」の、プライベートス
ペースとパブリックスペースの重複度合いを示す図面。FIG. 2 is a drawing showing the degree of overlap between private space and public space of “living-community type”, “dietary-independent type”, and “living-independent type” separated according to the degree of overlapping of life.
【図3】図1に於ける各スペースと共有要素の記号を示
す図面。FIG. 3 is a drawing showing symbols of each space and shared elements in FIG.
【図4】親世帯のイエスノーチヤート図面。[Figure 4] Yes No Chart chart of the parent household.
【図5】子世帯のイエスノーチヤートを示す図面であ
る。FIG. 5 is a view showing Yes No Chart of a child household.
P 親世帯ゾーン C 子世帯ゾーン F 共用ゾーン P Parent household zone C Child household zone F Shared zone
Claims (1)
より、「生活共同型」と「食生活独立型」と「生活独立
型」の3つの型に分類し、該3種類の型に至るイエスノ
ーチヤートを親世帯用と子世帯用の2種類設け、親世帯
と子世帯の別々に該イエスノーチヤートに沿って選択
し、上記3型の中から親世帯に最適な型と、子世帯に最
適な型を選択し、次に選択した型が一致しない場合に、
その不一致点を親世帯と子世帯の両方で検討し、最適な
型を選択することを特徴とする二世帯住宅の間取設計
法。1. According to the degree of overlap of life of a parent household and a child household living together, it is categorized into three types of "living common type", "dietary independent type" and "living independent type", and these three types are classified. There are two types of Yes No Charts for parent households and child households. Separately select the parent household and the child household according to the Yes No Chart, and select from among the above 3 types the optimal type for the parent household and the child household. If you select the best type and then the selected types do not match,
A floor plan design method for two-family houses, which is characterized by examining the disagreement points in both parent and child households and selecting the optimal type.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP4176660A JPH0619391A (en) | 1992-07-03 | 1992-07-03 | Method for designing plan of two-family house |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP4176660A JPH0619391A (en) | 1992-07-03 | 1992-07-03 | Method for designing plan of two-family house |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH0619391A true JPH0619391A (en) | 1994-01-28 |
Family
ID=16017477
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP4176660A Pending JPH0619391A (en) | 1992-07-03 | 1992-07-03 | Method for designing plan of two-family house |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPH0619391A (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7995746B2 (en) | 2000-05-09 | 2011-08-09 | Gn Netcom A/S | Headset |
-
1992
- 1992-07-03 JP JP4176660A patent/JPH0619391A/en active Pending
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7995746B2 (en) | 2000-05-09 | 2011-08-09 | Gn Netcom A/S | Headset |
US8630406B2 (en) | 2000-05-09 | 2014-01-14 | Gn Netcom A/S | Headset |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Timonen et al. | A new look at grandparenting | |
Russell | Men Doing “Women's Work:” elderly men caregivers and the gendered construction of care work | |
Hortaçsu | Family‐versus couple‐initiated marriages in Turkey: Similarities and differences over the family life cycle | |
Stevenson-Hinde | Parenting in different cultures: Time to focus. | |
Parish et al. | Gender and Familv | |
Carstens et al. | Ethnoracial awareness in intercountry adoption: US experiences | |
Trees et al. | Physical and emotional nourishment: Food as the embodied component of loving care of elderly family relatives | |
Coppens et al. | Cultural variation in the early development of initiative in children's prosocial helping | |
Hrast et al. | The social exclusion of the elderly: a mixed-methods study in Slovenia | |
McKim et al. | Infant care decisions and attachment security: The Canadian Transition to Child Care Study. | |
Winther | Space, time, and sociomaterial relationships: Moral aspects of the arrival of electricity in rural Zanzibar | |
Fee et al. | ‘When it faded in her… it faded in me’: a qualitative study exploring the impact of care-giving on the experience of spousal intimacy for older male care-givers | |
Cowan et al. | Clean homes and large utility bills 1900–1940 | |
JPH0619391A (en) | Method for designing plan of two-family house | |
Gray et al. | Young grandchildren and their grandparents: A secondary analysis of continuity and change across four birth cohorts | |
Kobayashi | The nature of support from adult sansei (third generation) children to older nisei (second generation) parents in Japanese Canadian families | |
Dike | “The machine does it!”: Using convenience technologies to analyze care, reproductive labor, gender, and class in urban Morocco | |
Sango et al. | Spirituality and the quality of life of individuals with intellectual disability | |
Bacchiddu | Updating the map of desires: mobile phones, satellite dishes and abundance as facets of modernity in Apiao, Chiloé, southern Chile | |
Wetlesen | Balancing work and childcare–the legacy of a gender equality experiment | |
Moss et al. | Understanding young people’s transitions in university halls through space and time | |
Wahyuni et al. | The older adults experience caring for grandchildren with special needs | |
Brown | Who's the Boss? The Political Economy of Unpaid Care Work and Food Sharing in Brooklyn, USA | |
MIZUMURA | Evaluation of Common Meal Activities of Collective Housing in Sweden | |
이민아 | Intergenerational reciprocal care and elderly living arrangements in Korea |