JP6333528B2 - Structural design support system - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a structural design support system for horizontal force of unit buildings constructed by connecting a plurality of building units.

  It is necessary to design the structure so that the horizontal proof strength of the building exceeds the horizontal force (horizontal load) received by the building due to an earthquake or wind. A structural design support system for testing the retained horizontal proof stress is known (see Patent Documents 1-4).

  Patent Document 1 discloses a unit building that can transmit a shearing force (horizontal shearing force) generated in the horizontal direction by connecting building units with a connecting member, and a structural calculation method for the retained horizontal strength. .

  Further, in Patent Document 2, an axial force generated in a column is obtained by stress analysis by changing the acting position of a horizontal load on a one-span frame formed by a column, a beam, and a load-bearing frame. A method of making a table showing the relationship between and for use in design is disclosed.

  Further, Patent Document 3 discloses a system in which structural calculation is performed in advance under individual design conditions for each building unit and a result table is stored in a database so that subsequent structural design can be performed quickly. Yes.

  On the other hand, Patent Document 4 discloses a structural design support system for unit buildings, in which a required wall amount is calculated for each direction of a building and a proof against a horizontal force is verified.

JP 2001-214530 A JP 2011-18315 A JP 2010-211431 A JP 2009-26303 A

  By the way, it is desired that the structural design support system not only can perform verification on the set structure, but also can easily change and re-verify the structure when it is necessary to change the structure according to the verification result.

  In addition, structural designers cannot be satisfied simply by selecting a building that meets the standard of proof stress. Which structural design support system is better considering economics, material usage, and design time? Judging.

  Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a structural design support system that can easily obtain a result desired by a designer.

  In order to achieve the above object, the structural design support system of the present invention is a structural design for horizontal force of a unit building constructed by connecting a plurality of building units formed of a frame by steel beams and pillars. A calculation system database that is a support system and stores a table of results of calculation of allowable shear strength in advance for each building unit specified by a combination of a plurality of types of beams and columns, and the calculation table database A building configuration setting means for setting a unit building configuration by combining the building units stored in the memory, and a test whether the unit building set by the building configuration setting means satisfies a standard for the horizontal force If the horizontal proof test means and the horizontal proof test means determine that the standard is not satisfied, the set unit building is configured. A replacement unit extracting means for extracting a building unit including a portion having the lowest achievement level of the standard from a plurality of building units, and the building unit extracted by the replacement unit extracting means are stored in the calculation table database. And a partial change means for setting a new unit building configuration by replacing with another building unit.

  Here, the calculation table database stores an allowable shear strength table in which building units are arranged according to a predetermined priority order, and the partial changing means selects a building unit to be replaced based on the priority order. be able to.

  In addition, it is preferable to include a re-extraction unit that extracts a building unit including a portion having the next lowest achievement level of the reference when the building unit stored in the calculation table database cannot be replaced.

  Furthermore, when a plurality of building units are extracted at a time by the replacement unit extracting means, it may be configured to include a rigid distance determining means for extracting any one building unit based on the distance from the rigid center. it can.

  Further, the building configuration setting means and the partial changing means can select a building unit from the calculation table database except for building units that are set to be unselectable.

  The structural design support system of the present invention configured as described above is a calculation table in the form of a table in which the allowable shear strength is calculated in advance for each building unit specified by a combination of a plurality of types of beams and columns. Store it in the database.

  The unit building that is configured by combining the building units stored in the calculation table database is tested by the horizontal strength test means, and if the standard is not met, the achievement of the standard is the lowest Replace only the building unit and retest.

  For this reason, the configuration of the unit building desired by the designer can be easily obtained by performing the re-verification without greatly changing the configuration of the unit building set first.

  In addition, by creating the calculation table database in the priority order desired by the designer, the unit building desired by the designer can be quickly reached. Furthermore, even when the building unit having the lowest degree of achievement of the standard cannot be replaced, it is possible to automatically determine the configuration of the unit building that satisfies the standard by providing the re-extraction means.

  In addition, even if multiple building units with the lowest standard achievement are extracted, one building unit can be extracted by the rigid distance determination means based on the distance from the rigid, The effect of twisting can be minimized.

  Furthermore, even when there are building units that cannot be selected due to restrictions such as the arrangement relationship of the building units, the building units can be selected from the calculation table database except for those.

It is the block diagram which showed the structure of the structural design support system of this Embodiment. It is a perspective view explaining the horizontal surface of a unit building. It is a flowchart explaining the flow of the design incorporating the structural design support system of this Embodiment. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the calculation method of design seismic force. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the calculation method of design wind pressure. It is an example which showed the calculation result of design seismic force and design wind pressure. It is an example which showed the calculation result of the twist correction coefficient. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the calculation method of a burden earthquake force and a burden wind pressure. It is an example which showed the calculation result of allowable shear strength. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the calculation formula of retained horizontal proof stress. It is an example which showed the calculation result of possessed horizontal proof stress and a structural characteristic coefficient. It is an example which showed the test result by a horizontal strength test means. It is a flowchart explaining the flow of a process of an exchange unit extraction means, a re-extraction means, and a rigid distance determination means. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the process of an exchange unit extraction means. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the process of a rigid distance determination means. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating another process of a rigid distance determination means. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating an example of the special connection pattern between the building units of an Example.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the structural design support system of the present embodiment. FIG. 2 is a perspective view for explaining the configuration of the unit building 10 that is designed using the structural design support system of the present embodiment. FIG. 3 is a flowchart for explaining a design flow in which the structural design support system of this embodiment is incorporated.

  First, the structure of the unit building 10 will be described. The unit building 10 is a building such as a detached house constructed by installing a plurality of rectangular parallelepiped (box-shaped) building units 1 vertically and horizontally.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 4, the building unit 1 includes four columns 11 as column members, and a beam 12 as a beam member spanned between the columns 11 and 11 in the long side direction (girder direction). A frame structure as a structural member is configured by the beam 13 as a beam material spanned between the pillars 11 in the short side direction (wife direction). This frame structure is a rigid frame structure in which the column 11 and the beam members (12, 13) are rigidly joined by welding via a joint piece.

  Here, the column 11 is formed of a closed cross-section material such as a square steel pipe. The beam members (12, 13) are made of an open cross-section material such as C-shaped steel. The girder beam 12 and the end beam 13 each have a roof beam (ceiling beam) and a floor beam.

  In the building unit 1 in which a framework is formed of such a steel material, there are a plurality of types as well as the size of the outer shape. That is, by combining the columns 11 and the beam members (12, 13) having different cross sections, the building unit 1 having different allowable shear strength even if the outer shape is the same is formed.

  As shown in FIG. 2, when a plurality of building units 1,... Are installed adjacent to each other and connected at the position of the connecting member 15 (see FIG. 16), horizontal shearing occurs between the building units 1, 1. A unit building 10 where force transmission is performed is formed. The connecting member 15 can be a thick steel plate or a box-shaped steel member.

  In the unit building 10 constructed in this way, if there is an upper floor, the floor structure of the upper floor building unit 1 is horizontal, and if it is the top floor or one floor, the ceiling structure of the building unit 1 is a horizontal structure. 101 will be formed. The horizontal building surface 101 having a shape covering the arranged building units 1... Can be handled as a structure that resists horizontal force in the entire building while considering twisting.

  FIG. 1 shows a main configuration of the structural design support system of the present embodiment. First, in the calculation table database 2, for each building unit (1,...) Specified by a combination of a plurality of types of beam members (12, 13) and column members (11) as shown in FIG. The results of calculating the allowable shear strength (Pa ′) in advance are stored in a table format.

  Here, the allowable shear strength (Pa ′) means that when any of the members of the building unit (column 11, girder beam 12 and end beam 13) reaches the allowable stress level, or the interlayer deformation angle reaches the specified value. It refers to the horizontal force of time.

  The table illustrated in FIG. 9 is hereinafter referred to as an allowable shear strength table (Pa ′ table). In this allowable shear strength table, a plurality of types of building units are arranged according to a predetermined priority. Here, one row of the table is data relating to one type of building unit.

  This priority order can be arbitrarily set. For example, as shown in FIG. 9, the building units can be arranged in order from the lowest allowable shear strength (third column from the right in the table) of the beam 12 for each floor. In this case, if building units are selected in order from the allowable shear strength table, economic design close to the standard can be performed.

  This priority order is not limited to this. For example, when it is desired to reduce the amount of steel used, the steel units used in the building unit 1 can be arranged in ascending order. Moreover, since the amount of steel used and the unit price are not necessarily linked, when it is desired to reduce the material cost, they can be arranged in ascending order of price. Furthermore, when it is desired to finish the design in a short time while avoiding repeated testing, the tests can be arranged in descending order of allowable shear strength.

  The building configuration setting means 31 reads the building units stored in the calculation table database 2 and combines them to form the configuration of one unit building 10 for verification (hereinafter referred to as “component member”). ) Is set.

  The horizontal strength test means 4 tests whether or not the unit building 10 set by the building configuration setting means 31 satisfies the standard with respect to the horizontal force (design seismic force, design wind pressure).

  Here, the “standard” refers to a determination criterion for the test. For example, when the test is performed using the design value / allowable value, 1 is the minimum standard of the test value, and “design value / allowable value ≦ 1” satisfies “the standard”. Note that if the margin ratio is set high by the designer's judgment, the test value is smaller than 1. On the other hand, when the test is performed with an allowable value / design value, “acceptable value / design value ≧ 1” satisfies “the standard”.

  Then, in the replacement unit extraction means 51, when it is determined by the horizontal strength test means 4 that the standard is not satisfied, the standard unit is selected from the plurality of building units 1,. The building unit with the lowest achievement is extracted.

  Here, “the degree of achievement of the standard is the lowest” means that the standard is farther away from the standard in comparison with others. For example, when the test is performed with the design value / allowable value, the achievement level of the standard is lower as the numerical value is larger. On the contrary, when the test is performed with the allowable value / design value, the achievement of the standard is lower as the numerical value is smaller.

  If only one building unit 1 with the lowest degree of achievement of the standard has been extracted, the extraction process can be terminated at that time, but if a plurality of building units 1, 1 are extracted at once, The extraction process is further continued by the rigid distance determination means 53.

  The rigid distance determination means 53 narrows down the building units 1 to one based on the distance from the rigid center of the unit building 10. Although details will be described later, when two portions having the lowest degree of achievement of the standard are selected (see unit frames 721 and 722 in FIG. 14), a building unit including a portion with a longer distance (the building unit in FIG. 14). 72E) is extracted.

  In addition, when three portions having the lowest degree of achievement of the standard in which the distance in one direction (X direction) is the same are selected (see unit frames 731, 732, and 733 in FIG. 15), the other directions that are orthogonal (Y A building unit (see building unit 73 </ b> C in FIG. 15) including a portion having a far direction is extracted.

  The partial change unit 32 replaces the building unit 1 extracted by the replacement unit extraction unit 51 or the rigid distance determination unit 53 with another building unit stored in the calculation table database 2, thereby configuring a new unit building 10. Set.

  In other words, when the allowable shear strength table (FIG. 9) of the calculation table database 2 is arranged in the order of the allowable shear strength of the girder beam 12, when the uppermost building unit does not satisfy the standard, Select and replace the building unit stored in the row. In some cases, building units are not selected according to the order in the table. Such an exception rule will be described in the embodiment.

  Here, there is a case where the building unit 1 extracted by the replacement unit extracting means 51 is at the lowest level of the allowable shear strength table (Pa ′ table) and there is no replaceable building unit. In such a case, the re-extracting means 52 extracts a building unit including a part having the next lowest level of achievement of the standard, and sends it to the partial changing means 32.

  Then, the horizontal strength test means 4 performs a test on the unit building 10 that has been newly configured by replacing it with another building unit by the partial change means 32. As a result of the test performed by the horizontal strength test means 4, the unit building 10 determined to satisfy the standard is output to the output means 6 as the determined configuration.

  Next, the flow of the structural design of the unit building 10 will be described with reference to FIG.

  First, a plan is determined in step S1. Here, the “plan” refers to the outline of the building unit 1 to be used (planar shape and elevation shape), combination and arrangement, and the type and arrangement of the outer wall 14 and partition to be used. Say to decide the overall structure.

  Subsequently, in step S2, an allowable shear strength table (Pa 'table) that matches the external shape and fixed load of the building unit 1 determined in the plan is selected from the calculation table database 2 and read.

  For example, all the unit buildings 10 shown in FIG. 4 have the same planar shape (not shown, but the elevation shape is the same), so the same allowable shear strength table (Pa ′ table) is used when the fixed load is the same. be able to. On the other hand, the same allowable shear strength table (Pa ′ table) as that of the L unit 1B cannot be used for the S unit 1A having a small planar shape as shown in FIG.

  Moreover, the allowable shear strength table (Pa 'table) to be used also changes depending on the difference in the fixed load. This fixed load varies depending on the presence / absence of an additional menu (additional building unit), the type of outer wall, the type of roof, the snow load, and the like. For this reason, the calculation table database 2 stores a plurality of allowable shear strength tables (Pa ′ tables).

  When selecting a building unit for the first time from the types of building units stored in the allowable shear strength table (Pa 'table), basically, the building unit stored at the top of the table is selected. Choose. Since some building units cannot be selected depending on the arrangement relationship as described in the embodiment, the topmost building unit is selected except for that.

  Then, by selecting all the building units 1,... Constituting the unit building 10 from the calculation table database 2, the first internal configuration (component member) of the unit building 10 is selected (step S3). As will be described below, if all of the initially set test results of the unit building 10 satisfy the criteria, the configuration of the unit building 10 is determined as it is.

  Subsequently, in step S4, for each unit building 10, a design horizontal force (design seismic force, design wind pressure), a torsion correction coefficient, an eccentricity rate, a rigidity rate and the like are calculated. In the present embodiment, as described with reference to FIG. 2, the unit building 10 is configured such that the horizontal shearing force is transmitted between the building units 1 and 1 by the horizontal surface 101.

  Therefore, as shown in FIG. 4, the primary design is examined for each street in accordance with the positions of the beam 12 and the beam 13. In the X direction, there are streets from the X1 row to the X4 row in which the end beams 13, 13 of the two building units 1, 1 are arranged. Further, in the Y direction, there are streets from the Y1 row to the Y4 row in which the beam beams 12, 12 of the two building units 1, 1 are arranged.

For each street, the design seismic force Pk is calculated using Equation 1 below.
On the other hand, the design wind pressure Pw is calculated using the following formula 2 with respect to the found area An as illustrated in the Y1 column of FIG.
Here, Formula 2 illustrates the calculation formula of the three-story unit building 10. 1F, 2F, and 3F indicate the first floor, the second floor, and the third floor, respectively.

  FIG. 6 shows an example in which the calculation results of the design seismic force Pk and the design wind pressure Pw are tabulated for each floor and each street. The table of FIG. 6 is merely an example, not the result of calculation based on FIGS.

  In the table of FIG. 7, in addition to the design seismic force Pk and the design wind pressure Pw, various torsion correction coefficients α, eccentricity and rigidity of each floor of the unit building 10 are shown. The table in FIG. 7 is also merely an example regardless of FIGS. 4-6.

  Subsequently, in step S5, the horizontal load Bd (burden seismic force Bk, burden wind pressure Bw) applied to each unit building 10 in consideration of the torsion correction coefficient is calculated.

As shown in FIG. 8, the burden seismic force Bk and the burden wind pressure Bw can be calculated by the following equations 3 and 4, where the Y direction is the nth column and the X direction is the mth.
Here, the part that can be expressed by the beam 12 or the end beam 13 of each building unit is defined as a unit frame (n-th column m-th).

  Then, using the Pa ′ value in the allowable shear strength table of the calculation table database 2 shown in FIG. 9, the burden seismic force Bk and the burden wind pressure Bw are verified for each street (step S6).

  Here, only the plate thickness is shown in the column of constituent members in FIG. As for other dimensions, for example, a roof beam formed of C-shaped steel can have a beam height of 200 mm and a flange width of 75 mm. In the case of floor beams, the beam height can be 150 mm and the flange width can be 75 mm. Further, a square steel pipe having a side of 100 mm can be used for the column 11.

  In the test of step S6, a test of “design value / allowable value ≦ 1” is performed. In other words, whether or not both of the burden seismic force Bk / allowable shear strength Pa ′ ≦ 1 and the burden wind pressure Bw / allowable shear strength Pa ′ ≦ 1 are satisfied is verified for each pass.

  The steps so far are the primary design. In the following steps, the secondary design will be described.

In step S7, the structural characteristic coefficient Ds ′ of the entire unit building 10 and the retained horizontal strength ΣQey are calculated. The retained horizontal yield strength ΣQey and the structural characteristic coefficient Ds ′ can be calculated by the following equations 5 and 6 with reference to FIG. 10A.
Here, total holdings lateral strength Qey _n of the unit frame n of each building unit is held horizontal strength ShigumaQey _n in the same plane.

  As shown in FIG. 10B, the retained horizontal proof stress ΣQey and the structural characteristic coefficient Ds ′ can be calculated in advance, and the calculation results can be stored in the calculation table database 2 in a tabular format. By doing so, it is possible to read from the calculation database table 2 when necessary as well as the allowable shear strength (Pa ′).

  Subsequently, in step S8, it is verified whether the retained horizontal strength ΣQey exceeds the required retained horizontal strength ΣQun. That is, if ΣQey / ΣQun ≧ 1, the criterion is satisfied.

Here, the required retained horizontal strength ΣQun can be calculated by the following equation 7.
FIG. 11 shows an example of the test result. Here, in the test of the retained horizontal proof stress of the secondary design, since “allowable value / design value ≧ 1” means “satisfy standard”, the smaller the numerical value, the lower the standard achievement level. . Note that “unit F” in the table of FIG. 11 indicates a unit frame that can be expressed by the girder beam 12 or the end beam 13 of each building unit.

  Next, a description will be given of a case where the constituent member initially set does not satisfy the standard by the above-described test. That is, step S11 and step S12 in FIG. 12 correspond to steps S3-S8 described in the flowchart in FIG. Then, when the first constituent member passes the test, it is determined as the first constituent member as it is (step S13).

  On the other hand, when the test result of the first constituent member does not satisfy the standard in at least one of the primary design and the secondary design, the process proceeds to step S14. Here, the replacement unit extraction means 51 extracts only one building unit 1 to be replaced from among the constituent members of the unit building 10 set first.

  FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a specific example for explaining the replacement unit extraction means 51. The unit building 70A shown in this figure is configured by connecting five building units 71A-71E. 7A shows the position of the rigid center of the unit building 70A.

  Then, the verification value of the primary design ((burden seismic force Bk or burdened wind pressure Bw) / allowable shear strength Pa ′) is described beside the unit frame including the end beam of each building unit 71A-71E. Yes. If this test value is 1 or less, the standard is satisfied, so only the right unit frame 711 of the building unit 71A on the upper right in FIG. 13 does not satisfy the test value.

  As described above, when there is only one building unit 71A including the test value with the lowest achievement level of the standard, the process can proceed to the next step S15. In step S15, the building unit in the next row in the configuration of the currently selected building unit 71A in the allowable shear strength table (Pa ′ table) is selected and replaced with the building unit 71A.

  Here, in the allowable shear strength table (Pa ′ table), when there is no building unit in the next row of the configuration of the currently selected building unit 71A, the re-extracting means 52 has the next lowest level of achievement of the standard. A value is searched for (step S16). In the example shown in FIG. 13, there are a plurality of “test values with the next lowest standard achievement level”. In such a case, processing similar to the following step S <b> 17 is performed.

  When a plurality of building units 1 and 1 are selected in step S14, the process moves to step S17 and processing is performed by the rigid distance determination means 53. FIG. 14 is a diagram showing a specific example for explaining the rigid distance determination means 53. The unit building 70B shown in this figure is configured by connecting five building units 72A to 72E.

  In this unit building 70B, the test value of the right unit frame 722 of the upper right building unit 72A and the test value of the left unit frame 721 of the left middle building unit 72E are the same value (1.03), and the standard achievement level Is the lowest test value.

  In such a case, the distance (new coordinate r) of the unit frames 721 and 722 from the rigid core 7B is determined by the rigid distance determination means 53. Then, the building unit 72E including the unit frame 721 having a far X-direction distance (new coordinate r) from the rigid core 7B is extracted as a building unit for replacement.

  In this way, even if the building unit 72E that is far from the rigid core 7B is reinforced, the torsion of the entire unit building 70B increases and the burden on the other building units 72A-72D increases unintentionally. Can be prevented. In other words, by making a change that minimizes the change in twist, it is possible to minimize the repetition of the test.

  On the other hand, since there may be a case where the number of building units to be replaced cannot be narrowed down to only one distance, the processing is continued in step S18. The unit building 70C shown in FIG. 15 is configured by connecting five building units 73A to 73E.

  In the unit building 70C, the test values of the right unit frames 731, 732, and 733 of the right building units 72A, 72B, and 72C are all the same value (1.03), and the standard achievement level is the lowest. . The distances (new coordinates r) in the X direction from the rigid cores 7C of these unit frames 731, 732, and 733 are also the same.

  Therefore, the distance in the Y direction, which is the direction orthogonal to the X direction, is compared. As a result, since the distance of the lower right building unit 73C is farthest from the rigid core 7C, the building unit 73C including the unit frame 733 is extracted as a building unit for replacement.

  After the constituent members satisfying the criteria of both step S6 and step S8 in FIG. 3 are determined as described above, the horizontal construction surface 101 of the unit building 10 is verified (step S9). If the standard is not satisfied in the verification of the horizontal surface 101, the reinforcement specification of the horizontal surface 101 is changed and the verification is performed again.

  Next, the operation of the structural design support system of this embodiment will be described.

  The structural design support system of the present embodiment configured as described above has an allowable shear strength (Pa ′) in advance for each building unit 1 specified by a combination of a plurality of types of beam members (12, 13) and columns 11. The calculation result is stored in the calculation table database 2 as an allowable shear strength table (Pa ′ table).

  Then, the unit building 10 configured by combining the building units stored in the calculation table database 2 is tested by the horizontal strength test means 4, and if the standard is not satisfied, the achievement level of the standard Only the building unit 1 with the lowest is exchanged and the test is performed again.

  For this reason, the configuration of the unit building 10 desired by the designer can be easily obtained by performing the re-verification without greatly changing the configuration of the unit building 10 set at the beginning.

  In addition, by creating the allowable shear strength table (Pa ′ table) in the priority order desired by the designer, the unit building 10 desired by the designer can be quickly reached. Furthermore, even when the building unit 1 having the lowest degree of achievement of the standard cannot be replaced, the configuration of the unit building 10 that satisfies the standard can be automatically determined by providing the re-extraction means 52.

  Even if a plurality of building units 1 and 1 having the lowest achievement level of the standard are extracted, one building unit can be extracted by the rigid distance determination means 53 based on the distance from the rigid center. It is possible to minimize the influence of twist due to the change.

  Hereinafter, an example of a form different from the above-described embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. Note that the description of the same or equivalent parts as the contents described in the above embodiment will be described using the same reference numerals or the same terms.

  In the above-described embodiment, a case has been described in which building units are extracted sequentially from the top of the allowable shear strength table (Pa ′ table). On the other hand, a present Example demonstrates the case where the building unit which cannot be selected exists by restrictions, such as arrangement | positioning relationship of building unit 1, ....

  The unit building 10A shown in FIG. 16 includes an L unit 1B which is a building unit having a long girder size on the right side and an S unit 1A which is a building unit having a short girder size.

  In such a case, since the connecting member 15 with the S unit 1A is connected in the middle of the beam 12 of the L unit 1B, not only the reinforcing beam 16 is required but also the member of the L unit 1B. The minimum cross-sectional dimension can be limited.

  This minimum cross-sectional dimension varies depending on the girder size of the L unit 1B, but when combined with a square steel pipe column 11 having a side of 100 mm, for example, when the girder size is 5514 mm, the minimum cross-sectional dimension of the roof beam is the height of the beam. 200mm, flange width 75mm, plate thickness 3.2mm.

  For this reason, even if there is a building unit in which a roof beam having a cross section smaller than the minimum cross sectional dimension is incorporated above the allowable shear strength table (Pa ′ table), it cannot be selected. The allowable shear strength table (Pa 'table) is lowered, and a building unit incorporating a roof beam that satisfies this minimum cross-sectional dimension is selected.

  Such a special arrangement includes not only the example shown in FIG. 16 but also various examples. Even if there are building units that cannot be selected due to restrictions such as the arrangement relationship of building units in the allowable shear strength table (Pa 'table), by setting exception rules excluding them, The building unit can be appropriately selected from the allowable shear strength table (Pa 'table).

  Other configurations and functions and effects are substantially the same as those in the above-described embodiment, and thus description thereof is omitted.

  The embodiment of the present invention has been described in detail above with reference to the drawings. However, the specific configuration is not limited to the embodiment and the example, and the design change is within a range not departing from the gist of the present invention. Are included in the present invention.

10,10A unit building 1 building unit 1A S unit (building unit)
1B L unit (building unit)
11 Pillar (column material)
12 Girder (beam)
13 Tsumara (beam material)
2 Calculation table database 31 Building configuration setting means 32 Partial change means 4 Horizontal strength test means 51 Replacement unit extraction means 52 Re-extraction means 53 Rigid distance determination means

Claims (3)

A structural design support system for horizontal force of a unit building constructed by connecting a plurality of building units formed of a frame by steel beams and pillars,
A calculation table database in which the result of calculating the allowable shear strength in advance for each building unit specified by a combination of a plurality of types of beams and pillars is stored in a tabular format;
Building configuration setting means for setting the configuration of a unit building by combining the building units stored in the calculation table database;
Horizontal strength test means for testing whether or not the unit building set by the building configuration setting means satisfies a standard for the horizontal force;
When the horizontal proof test means determines that the standard is not satisfied, the replacement is performed to extract a building unit including a portion having the lowest degree of achievement of the standard from a plurality of building units constituting the set unit building. Unit extraction means;
A partial change unit that sets the configuration of a new unit building by replacing the building unit extracted by the replacement unit extraction unit with another building unit stored in the calculation table database;
A structural design support system, comprising: a re-extraction unit that extracts a building unit including a portion having the next lowest achievement level of the reference when the building unit stored in the calculation table database cannot be replaced. A structural design support system for horizontal force of a unit building constructed by connecting a plurality of building units formed of a frame by steel beams and pillars,
A calculation table database in which the result of calculating the allowable shear strength in advance for each building unit specified by a combination of a plurality of types of beams and pillars is stored in a tabular format;
Building configuration setting means for setting the configuration of a unit building by combining the building units stored in the calculation table database;
Horizontal strength test means for testing whether or not the unit building set by the building configuration setting means satisfies a standard for the horizontal force;
When the horizontal proof test means determines that the standard is not satisfied, the replacement is performed to extract a building unit including a portion having the lowest degree of achievement of the standard from a plurality of building units constituting the set unit building. Unit extraction means;
A partial change unit that sets the configuration of a new unit building by replacing the building unit extracted by the replacement unit extraction unit with another building unit stored in the calculation table database;
A structural design comprising a rigid distance determination means for extracting any one building unit based on a distance from a rigid center when a plurality of building units are extracted at a time by the replacement unit extracting means. Support system. 3. The structural design support system according to claim 1, wherein the building configuration setting unit and the partial change unit select a building unit from the calculation table database except for a building unit that is set to be unselectable. 4. .