JP3403049B2 - Elevator control device - Google Patents

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an elevator controller for selecting an optimal elevator from a plurality of elevators for a hall call and performing service.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Generally, when a plurality of elevators are installed and a plurality of floors are serviced, a control method called group control of elevators is adopted. The elevator control device in this case is provided with a single control device that individually controls each elevator, and a group management control device that selects and allocates an optimal elevator from a plurality of elevators to a hall call.

The group management control device comprises a hall call registration unit for registering a hall call from each floor, and an allocation control unit for selecting and allocating an optimum elevator to the call from the hall call registration unit. The assigned signal assigned by the assignment control unit is output to the single control device of the elevator. Then, the unit controller controls the elevator of the own machine based on the allocation signal and the operation state signal of the own machine.

That is, in the elevator group management control system, when a landing call occurs, the allocation control unit of the group management control device selects and allocates an elevator that is most suitable for coping with the landing call among a plurality of elevators. ,
The other elevators are controlled not to respond to the landing call. Moreover, when selecting the most suitable elevator for a landing call, the goal is to reduce the waiting time and equalize the waiting time at the landing on all floors.

FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining an operation of an elevator under the conventional group management control. Now in a 12 story building 2
It is assumed that elevators A and B are installed, and that Unit A is located on the first floor and Unit B is located on the fourth floor. And
Unit A has a car call A2 on the 10th floor, and Unit B has 1
It is assumed that there is an assigned hall call B1 on the first floor and a car call B2 on the twelfth floor. In this state, it is assumed that the UP hall call A1 on the 9th floor occurs while Unit A is open on the 1st floor.

[0006] First of all, the A station call UP platform call A1 on the 9th floor.
Consider the case of assigning. The predicted arrival time TA to the 9th floor of the Unit A is 13 seconds, and the predicted arrival time TB of the Unit B to the 11th floor is 10 seconds. In this case, if it has been 5 seconds since the 11th floor call B1 was registered,
The predicted arrival time (predicted arrival time + call duration) for responding to the 11th floor call is 15 seconds. Therefore, the hall call A1 (9th floor) and the hall call B1 (11
The average non-response time is 14 seconds, and the standard deviation of the non-response time is 1.4 seconds.

Next, call the UP platform call A1 on the 9th floor to Unit B.
Consider the case of assigning. The predicted arrival time TB to the 9th floor of Unit B is 8 seconds, and the predicted arrival time TB of Unit B to the 11th floor will stop once on the 9th floor. Stop time (6 seconds), 9th floor
The total running time from the 11th floor to the 11th floor (4 seconds) is 18 seconds. In other words, adding 5 seconds to this, the predicted response time is 2
It will be 3 seconds. Therefore, the average end response time of the hall call A1 on the 9th floor and the hall call B1 on the 11th floor is 15.5 seconds,
The standard deviation of the non-response time is 10.6 seconds.

[0008] From these, in consideration of the shortening and equalization latency landing all floors floor, when assigning the appropriate Unit, small overall response time and unanswered dicamba
Unit A with a low degree of wobbling is called the 9th floor hall A1
Will be assigned to. As a result, to the passengers waiting on the 9th floor, it seems that Unit B has passed.
Therefore, in order to prevent the passengers waiting at the landing from being confused, an elevator controlled by group management is usually not provided with a landing car position display device.

If a car position display device for a landing car is installed, priority is given to prevention of passage rather than shortening or equalization of waiting time of the landing on all floors, and an elevator that is likely to pass the floor for a landing call. The elevator car position display device is turned on only for the elevators that are scheduled to respond to the hall call so that the movements of other elevators cannot be seen.

[0010]

However, the passage cannot be completely eliminated only by the assignment control by the assignment control unit of the group management control device. That is, when the allocation control unit tries to make an elevator that is likely to pass a hall call respond, there is a signal delay from the allocation control unit to the stand-alone control device or a processing delay. is necessary. The elevator that is about to pass the call will take into consideration whether it is beyond the physical stop range and whether it can be stopped reliably, so there is a certain margin in terms of distance. is necessary. Therefore, when there is a positional problem due to the margin value, the allocation control unit cannot necessarily cause an elevator that is likely to pass through to respond to the landing call.

Further, when the assigned machines and the unassigned machines are running side by side, unnecessary allocation changes may frequently occur between the two machines. In this case, the unassigned machines are on a fixed floor than the allocated machines. It is necessary to change the assignment so that it will not pass through only when it is likely to arrive off the floor first. Therefore, if the two cars are close to each other, there may be a passage. Furthermore, if the assigned vehicle is located immediately before the landing call, the passage may be permitted without changing the assignment.

If the car position display device for the landing car is not installed, or if only the car position display device for the car that responds to the landing call is turned on, the waiting passengers at the landing will not be able to see the movement of the entire elevator, which makes them uneasy. Therefore, there is an increasing demand for people to be able to see the movement of elevators at the landing.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide an elevator control device that prevents an elevator passenger from feeling uncomfortable due to an elevator passing through a hall call registration floor.

[0014]

An elevator control apparatus according to a first aspect of the present invention registers a landing call from each floor when a plurality of elevators are installed and a plurality of floors are serviced. Of the landing call registration unit, the allocation control unit that selects and allocates the most suitable elevator to the call from the landing call registration unit, and the elevator of the own machine based on the allocation signal from the allocation control unit or the car call of the own machine.
During the control of the
In the meantime, when a hall call within a fixed floor is detected, a single control device that responds to the hall call is provided.

In the elevator control apparatus according to the invention of claim 1, the allocation control unit selects and allocates an optimum elevator to the hall call from the hall call registration unit,
The single control device controls the elevator of its own machine based on the allocation signal from the allocation control unit or the car call of its own machine.
During the control, standalone controller, the own machine driving direction
When a hall call within a certain floor is detected before the next scheduled floor , the elevator responds to the hall call.

An elevator control apparatus according to a second aspect of the present invention includes a hall call registration unit for registering a hall call from each floor when a plurality of elevators are installed and a plurality of floors are serviced. , hall call allocation control unit to allocate by selecting an optimal elevator relative call from registering unit, assignment signals or own machine from the allocation controller car call to based the own machine in the control of the own machine of the elevator It is equipped with a single control device that responds to a landing call if it detects a landing call within the fixed arrival time on the driving direction side of its own machine before the next expected floor on the driving direction side And

In the elevator controller according to the second aspect of the present invention, the allocation control unit selects and allocates an optimum elevator to the hall call from the hall call registration unit,
The single control device controls the elevator of its own machine based on the allocation signal from the allocation control unit or the car call of its own machine.
During the control, standalone controller, the own machine driving direction
If a landing call with a predicted arrival time on the driving direction side of the own machine within a certain time is detected before the next scheduled floor ,
The elevator is made to respond to the landing call.

An elevator control device according to a third aspect of the present invention is the elevator control device according to the first or second aspect, wherein the assignment control unit is such that an elevator other than the assigned number first responds to the landing call. In this case, the assignment of the assigned number is canceled based on the landing call elimination command from the unit control device of the corresponding number.

In the elevator control device according to the invention of claim 3, in addition to the operation of the elevator control device according to claim 1 or 2, when an elevator other than the assigned car responds to the hall call first , Cancel the assignment of assigned number. This prevents duplicate responses.

An elevator control apparatus according to a fourth aspect of the present invention is the elevator control apparatus according to the first or second aspect, wherein the allocation control unit is provided when a plurality of elevators are located within a fixed floor. Is the elevator
If it is located on the same floor as the controller unit
Is prioritized over a stopped elevator
For the stand-alone control device, the landing call on the driving direction side of the own machine
It is characterized in that the input of each item is permitted.

In the elevator control device according to the invention of claim 4, in addition to the operation of the elevator control device according to claim 1 or 2, when the plurality of elevators are located within a fixed floor , A single elevator running
Stopped if it is on the same floor as the control device
Control of a running elevator prior to other elevators
Allows the device to enter a landing call on the driving direction side of its own machine . This prevents duplicate responses.

An elevator control device according to a fifth aspect of the present invention is the elevator control device according to the first or second aspect, wherein the allocation control unit stops a car other than the allocated car at the floor call generation floor. When it detects that
The time required for the stop is also a requirement for the expected arrival time of the unit.

In the elevator control device according to the fifth aspect of the present invention, in addition to the operation of the elevator control device according to the first or second aspect, the car other than the assigned car stops at the floor call generation floor. When it is detected, the time required for the stop is also a requirement for the expected arrival time of the unit.
As a result, the predicted arrival time of each elevator other than the assigned one at each stop floor is calculated more accurately.

An elevator control device according to a sixth aspect of the present invention is the elevator control device according to the first or second aspect, wherein the single control device is a floor to which a floor call for each floor is input. The feature is that the floor not to be input can be selected.

In the elevator control device according to the invention of claim 6, in addition to the operation of the elevator control device according to claim 1 or claim 2, in response to the landing call on each floor, it is input to the single control device. When the floor to be designated is specified, the floor call for the floor is answered, and the hall call for the floor not input is not answered.

[0026]

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Embodiments of the present invention will be described below. FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of an elevator control device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Each floor has hall call buttons 1a to 1n.
Are installed, and the hall call input / output control units 2a to 2 are respectively installed.
It is input to the group management control device 3 via n. The group management control device 3 includes a hall call registration unit 4 for registering a hall call from each floor, and an allocation control unit 5 for selecting and allocating an optimum elevator to the call from the hall call registration unit 4. The allocation signals that are configured and allocated by the allocation control unit 5 are the single control devices 6a to 6m of the corresponding elevator.
Is output to.

The unit control devices 6a to 6m are provided for the respective elevator cars 7a to 7m, and individually control the elevator cars 7a to 7m, respectively. Further, car call buttons 8a to 8m and car call input / output control units 9a to 9m are provided on the respective elevator cars 7a to 7m. The single control devices 6a to 6m control the elevator of the own machine based on the allocation signal from the allocation control unit 5 and the car call of the own machine, and detect a landing call within a certain floor on the operating direction side of the own machine. At that time, it responds to the landing call.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing the operation of the unit controller 6 in the first embodiment of the present invention.
The figure shows the case of responding to a landing call within a certain floor on the driving direction side of the own machine. First, each of the single control devices 6a to 6m detects the position and operating direction of the elevator cars 7a to 7m of its own machine (step 11). And
It is searched whether or not there is a landing call from the position of the elevator car to the next scheduled floor (step 12).

Here, the processing contents in step 12 are shown in FIG.
Will be described with reference to. FIG. 3 shows the structure of the hall call table in the single unit control device 6. Figure 3 (a)
Is a UP landing call table, and FIG. 3 (b) is DOW
The N platform call tables are shown. The hall call information input from the hall call registration unit 4 of the group management control device 3 is stored in the UP hall call table or the DOWN hall call table in the memory of the single control device 6.

It is assumed that there is a landing call in the UP direction on the 9th floor, and the elevator car 7 is traveling on the 6th floor toward the 12th floor in the UP direction. When the current car position 6th floor, the UP direction that is the driving direction, and the 12th floor that is the next scheduled stop floor are detected, the unit control device 6 determines that the driving direction is the UP direction. Refer to the platform call table,
The presence or absence of a landing call from the 6th floor at the elevator car position to the 12th floor, which is the next stop floor, is detected. In this case,
As shown in (a), there is a hall call on the 9th floor, so the hall call on the 9th floor is detected.

If it is detected that there is a landing call from the elevator car position to the next floor to arrive,
It is determined whether or not the hall call is within a certain floor from the elevator car position (step 13), and if it is within a certain floor, whether or not the floor can be stopped considering the deceleration distance. Judgment (step 14). If it is possible to stop at that floor, the fact that the vehicle is stopped at that floor is recorded in the memory (stop scheduled floor table) in the unit control device 6 (step 15). Finally, it is determined whether or not the processes from step 12 to step 15 have been performed for all the landing calls up to the next floor to be stopped, and if not completed, the operation from step 12 is repeated (step 16).

As described above, according to the first embodiment, the elevator car 7 is stopped only when there is a landing call within a fixed floor in the driving direction of the own machine, so that the waste operation is prevented. It is possible to prevent passage of landing calls without increasing the number.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart showing the operation of the single unit control device 6 in the second embodiment of the present invention.
The second embodiment is different from the first embodiment shown in FIG. 2 in that instead of responding to a landing call within a fixed floor on the driving direction side of the own machine, It is designed to respond to a landing call whose predicted arrival time on the driving direction side is within a fixed time.

Similar to the case of the first embodiment, the position and the driving direction of the elevator car 7 are judged (step 2
1) It is searched whether or not there is a landing call from the elevator car position to the next scheduled floor (step 22). When it is detected that there is a landing call, the arrival time of the elevator car 7 before the landing call is calculated (step 23). As a result of calculating the arrival time, it is judged whether or not the landing call is within a certain time (step 2
4) If the floor can be stopped in consideration of the deceleration distance (step 25), the fact that the floor is stopped is recorded in the memory (scheduled stop floor table) in the single control device 6 (step 26). Finally, it is judged whether or not the processes from step 22 to step 26 have been carried out for all the landing calls to the next stop floor, and if not completed, the operation from step 22 is repeated (step 27).

According to the second embodiment, the elevator car 7 is stopped only when there is a landing call that can arrive within a certain time in the driving direction of the driver's own driving direction, so that useless driving is increased. It is possible to prevent the passage of a landing call more accurately than without judging from the distance.

Next, a third embodiment of the present invention will be described. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the operation of the single unit control device 6 in the third embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing the operation of the allocation control unit 5 in the third embodiment of the present invention. In the third embodiment, when an elevator other than the assigned number first responds to the landing call, the assignment of the assigned number is canceled,
This is to prevent the assigned cars from responding to landing calls in duplicate.

The unit control device controls the stop of elevators other than the assigned number even in the intermediate floor stored in step 15 of FIG. 2 or step 26 of FIG. That is, in FIG. 5, when the elevator is decelerated at the planned stop floor (step 31), the single control device 6 detects the stop floor and the driving direction of the elevator car (step 32). Next, it is detected whether or not there is a landing call in the same direction as the driving direction of the elevator car on the stop floor (step 3
3) If there is a landing call, a landing call deletion command is output to the group management control device 3 to delete the landing call (step 34).

As shown in FIG. 6, the group management control device 3 is
It is determined whether or not the hall call deletion command is input from the single control device 6 (step 35), and when it is detected that the hall call deletion command is input, the unit that is outputting the hall call deletion command is selected. Identify and detect (step 3)
6). Then, it is determined whether or not the number machine that outputs the hall call deletion command is the assigned number stored in the assignment control unit 5 for the hall call (step 37). As a result, it is determined that the number is a different number. If so, the allocation control unit 5
Cancels the allocation of the assigned car (step 38), and the hall call registration unit 4 deletes the hall call (step 39).

According to the third embodiment, it is possible to prevent passage of a landing call and prevent wasteful operation due to the assigned number later responding to the same floor.

Next, a fourth embodiment of the present invention will be described. FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the operation of the allocation control unit 5 in the fourth embodiment of the present invention. In the fourth embodiment, when a plurality of elevators run side by side within a fixed floor, a single controller 6 for one elevator is used.
The entry of the landing call is permitted only in the vehicle, and the plurality of elevators are prevented from overlapping and responding to the same landing call.

In FIG. 7, a variable C1 representing an elevator car as a comparison source is set as an initial setting (step 71). Next, it is checked whether the elevator car represented by the variable C1 has directionality (step 72). If the checked elevator car C1 has directionality, the variable C2 representing the elevator car to be compared is set (step 73).

On the other hand, if it is determined in step 72 that the elevator car C1 checked does not have directionality,
The elevator car as the comparison source is updated with C1 = C1 + 1 (step 7F).

Next, it is checked whether the elevator car represented by the variable C2 has directionality (step 74). Checked elevator car C2
However, if it does not have directionality, C2 = C2 + 1 is set and the elevator car to be compared is updated (step 7).
D).

On the other hand, if the checked elevator car C2 has directionality in the judgment at step 74, the elevator car C1 represented by the variable C1 and the elevator car C2 represented by the variable C2 have the same directionality. It is checked whether or not it has (step 75). If the directions of both elevator cars are not in the same direction,
The elevator car to be compared is updated with C2 = C2 + 1 (step 7D). If the directions of both elevator cars are in the same direction, it is checked whether the floor difference between the positions of the elevator cars represented by the variables C1 and C2 is smaller than a predetermined constant n. (Step 76).

Elevator car C1 and elevator car C2
If the floor difference between and is larger than the constant n, C2 = C2 + 1
As a result, the elevator car to be compared is updated (step 7D). Elevator car C1 and elevator car C2
If the floor difference between and is smaller than the constant n, it is checked whether the car positions of the elevator car C1 and the elevator car C2 are on the same floor (step 77).

Elevator car C1 and elevator car C2
If the car positions are on the same floor, it is checked whether the elevator car C1 and the elevator car C2 are stopped (step 78). If the car positions of the elevator car C1 and the elevator car C2 are not on the same floor, the hall call registration information is sent only to the single control device 6 of the elevator car traveling at the top (step 79). The elevator car traveling at the top here has a car direction U
When it is in the P direction, it means the elevator car that is traveling on the upper floor, and when it is in the DOWN direction, it means the elevator car that is traveling on the lower floor.

When both the elevator car C1 and the elevator car C2 are stopped (including deceleration), the hall call registration information is sent only to the elevator car that arrives first (sub 7A). When either one of the elevator car C1 and the elevator car C2 is stopped (including deceleration), the hall call registration information is sent only to the traveling elevator car (step 7).
B). When both the elevator car C1 and the elevator car C2 are traveling, the hall call registration information is sent only to the elevator car C1 (step 7C).

Next, C2 = C2 + 1 is set and the elevator car to be compared is updated (step 7D). Then C
It is determined whether or not 2 is smaller than (the number of elevator cars-1) (step 7E), and if so, the process returns to step 74. When C2 is a value larger than (the number of elevator cars-1) or the same value, C1 = C1 + 1
The elevator car that is the comparison source is updated as (step 7F). And C1 is (the number of elevator cars-1)
It is determined whether or not the value is smaller (step 7G),
If so, the process returns to step 72, and if C1 has a value larger than (the number of elevator cars-1) or the same value, the process ends.

In this way, the allocation control unit 5 of the group management control device 3 monitors the running state and stopped state of each elevator car, the running direction, and the car position, and the floor difference of the elevator cars is constant in the same operating direction. When it detects that it is within the range,
Select the elevator car to be stopped for the registered landing call. And that elevator car
The elevator car registration unit 4 is notified of which elevator car it is. The hall call registration unit 4 sends the hall call registration information only to the unit control device 6 of the elevator car according to the elevator car information sent from the allocation control unit 5 to stop the hall call registration state. As a result, it is possible to avoid a wasteful operation in which a plurality of elevator cars stop for the same landing call.

Next, a fifth embodiment of the present invention will be described. FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the operation of the allocation control unit 5 according to the fifth embodiment of the present invention. In the fifth embodiment, when it is detected that a car other than the assigned car stops at the floor call generation floor, the allocation control unit 5 also sets the time required for the stop as a requirement for the predicted arrival time of the car. It was done like this.

In FIG. 8, a variable C1 indicating the elevator car number and a variable t (C1) indicating the expected arrival time of each elevator car are set as initial settings (step 81). Next, on the scheduled stop floor of the elevator car C1,
It is checked whether there is a car call or landing call assignment for the elevator car C1 (step 82).

If no car call or landing call for the elevator car C1 is assigned to the scheduled stop floor of the elevator car C1, the expected arrival time t (C1) of the elevator car C1 is reached.
The running time, deceleration time, door opening / closing time, and acceleration time up to the stop are added to the scheduled stop floor (step 83).

Next, it is checked whether or not the process of step 82 has been carried out for all the scheduled stop floors of the elevator car C1 (step 84).
Return to. If the process of step 82 has already been performed for all stop floors, C1 = C1 + 1 is set and C1 is updated to the next elevator car (step 85). Next, the variable C
1 and (the number of elevator cars-1) are compared (step 86). If the variable C1 is small, the process returns to step 82, and if the variable C1 is large or the same, the process ends.

As described above, the allocation control unit 5 of the group supervisory control device 3 compares the allocation information for the landing call with the car information, and the elevators to which the allocation is made and the cars to which the car call is registered and these cars. When it is predicted that other cars will stop at the floor call registration floor, the deceleration time, door opening time, and acceleration time of the elevator car required for the stop are reflected in the predicted arrival time. As a result, the correct expected arrival time can be obtained.

Next explained is the sixth embodiment of the invention. FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing the operation of the single unit control device 6 according to the sixth embodiment of the present invention. This 6th
In this embodiment, the floor to be input and the floor not to be input for the hall call on each floor can be selected.

In FIG. 9, a variable h indicating a service floor is set as an initial setting (step 91). The floor to be serviced is sequentially set in this variable h. For example, when servicing each floor of a building on the 1st to 11th floors,
~ 11 are sequentially set.

Next, it is checked whether the floor corresponding to the set variable h is the floor call input permission floor (step 92). This check is performed by the floor call input permission floor bouble FLR preset in the memory of the single control device 6.
It is performed based on (h). FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram of the hall call input permission table. This hall call input permission table is formed in a rewritable read-only memory of the single control device 6, and “1” is set in the hall call input permission floor.
Is set, and "0" is set for floors that are not permitted.

If it is determined in step 92 that the floor call input is permitted, the floor call input is referred to (step 9).
3). That is, if there is a landing call on the floor, the landing call is taken in and made effective. On the other hand, if the floor call input is not permitted, the hall call input is not referred regardless of the presence or absence of the hall call, and the hall call of the floor is not taken in.

Next, the variable h is set to h = h + 1, and the variable h is updated to the next floor (step 94). Then, it is checked whether or not the variable h is the same as the number of service floors. If they are not the same, the process returns to step 92, and if they are the same, the process ends (step 95).

As described above, in the stand-alone control device 6, the hall call registration information sent from the hall call registration unit 4 to each stand-alone control device 6 is compared with the hall call registration information of the floor not registered in the hall call input permission table. Since it is not referred to, the assigned unit will respond to the landing call on that floor.

[0062]

As described above, according to the present invention, in a group management control elevator configured so that waiting passengers at the landing can see the movement of the elevator, the status of the landing call can be input even in each single control device. When it is detected that a landing call is about to pass, the own machine is stopped for the landing call, so that the elevator can be prevented from passing the landing call registration floor. As a result, it is possible to prevent the waiting passengers at the landing from feeling uncomfortable.

[Brief description of drawings]

FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of an elevator control device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an operation of the single unit control device according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a landing call table in the single unit control device according to the first embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 3 (a) is an UP landing call table, and FIG. 3 (b) is DO.
It is a WN platform call table.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an operation of a single unit control device according to a second embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart showing an operation of a unit controller in the third embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an operation of an allocation control unit according to the third exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing an operation of an allocation control unit according to the fourth exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing an operation of an allocation control unit according to the fifth exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing an operation of a single unit control device according to a sixth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram of a landing call input permission table in the single unit control device according to the sixth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 11 is an operation explanatory diagram of a conventional elevator group management control.

[Explanation of symbols]

1 Stop call button 2 Platform input / output control unit 3 group management control device 4 Platform registration section 5 Allocation control unit 6 Single controller 7 elevator cars 8 basket call button

Front Page Continuation (72) Inventor Kenji Tajima No. 1 Toshiba-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo Inside the Fuchu factory, Toshiba Corporation (56) Reference JP-A-55-48173 (JP, A) JP-B-62-38270 (JP) , B2) Patent 3251595 (JP, B2) (58) Fields investigated (Int.Cl. ⁷ , DB name) B66B 1/00-1/52

Claims (6)

(57) [Claims] 1. A hall call registration unit for registering a hall call from each floor when installing a plurality of elevators and servicing a plurality of floors, and a call from the hall call registration unit. And an allocation signal from the allocation control unit
Or , based on the car call of the own machine ,
During control until the next scheduled floor on the driving direction side of the own machine
Control device for an elevator, characterized in that a single control unit to respond to call its landing upon detection of call landing within a certain floor to. 2. A hall call registration unit for registering a hall call from each floor when installing a plurality of elevators and servicing a plurality of floors, and a call from the hall call registration unit. And an allocation signal from the allocation control unit
Or , based on the car call of the own machine ,
During control until the next scheduled floor on the driving direction side of the own machine
Self Unit Once the predicted arrival time of the operation direction side detects the call landing within a predetermined time control device for an elevator, characterized in that a single control device that responds to the call to. 3. The elevator control apparatus according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the allocation control unit, when an elevator other than the allocated car responds to the landing call first,
An elevator control device characterized in that the allocation of the allocated car is canceled based on a landing call elimination command from the unit control device of the corresponding car. 4. The elevator control device according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the allocation control unit is in a leading run when a plurality of elevators are located within a fixed floor.
Located on the same floor as the elevator's single controller
If it is, the moving elevator is given priority over the stopped elevator.
Operating direction side of the own machine with respect to the single control device of the elevator
An elevator control device characterized in that input of a landing call is permitted. 5. The elevator control device according to claim 1, wherein when the allocation control unit detects that a car other than the allocated car stops at the floor call generation floor, the allocation control unit stops the car. An elevator control device characterized in that the required time is also a requirement for the expected arrival time of the unit. 6. The elevator control device according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the single control device is capable of selecting a floor to be input and a floor not to be input for a landing call on each floor. An elevator control device characterized by the above.