[go: up one dir, main page]

JP2002299900A - Mounting component inspection method and device - Google Patents

Mounting component inspection method and device

Info

Publication number
JP2002299900A
JP2002299900A JP2001097037A JP2001097037A JP2002299900A JP 2002299900 A JP2002299900 A JP 2002299900A JP 2001097037 A JP2001097037 A JP 2001097037A JP 2001097037 A JP2001097037 A JP 2001097037A JP 2002299900 A JP2002299900 A JP 2002299900A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
inspection
component
data
types
inspection data
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2001097037A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4643848B2 (en
Inventor
Tomohiro Kimura
知博 木村
Kazuharu Kanbara
一晴 神原
Daisuke Nagai
大介 永井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Panasonic Holdings Corp
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd filed Critical Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority to JP2001097037A priority Critical patent/JP4643848B2/en
Publication of JP2002299900A publication Critical patent/JP2002299900A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4643848B2 publication Critical patent/JP4643848B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Supply And Installment Of Electrical Components (AREA)
  • Electric Connection Of Electric Components To Printed Circuits (AREA)

Abstract

(57)【要約】 【課題】 基板検査データを入れ替えることなく複数種
類の多社購買部品を実装した実装基板を外観検査できる
実装基板検査方法を提供する。 【解決の手段】 基板上の同じ位置に実装される部品
で、特性は同じでも外観の異なる複数種類の部品の外観
検査を行う場合、予め部品の種類だけの部品検査用基準
データを記憶部に記憶させておき、複数種類の部品が実
装される位置の部品検査を行う際に、検査対象部品の種
類を判別して、その部品に該当する部品検査用基準デー
タ前記記憶部に記憶させた複数の部品検査データから選
択して検査を行う。
(57) [Summary] [PROBLEMS] To provide a mounting board inspection method capable of inspecting the appearance of a mounting board on which a plurality of types of parts purchased by multiple companies are mounted without replacing the board inspection data. SOLUTION: When performing an appearance inspection of a plurality of types of components having the same characteristics but different appearances at the same position on a substrate, component inspection reference data only for the type of the component is stored in a storage unit in advance. When performing a component inspection at a position where a plurality of types of components are mounted, the type of the component to be inspected is determined, and the component inspection reference data corresponding to the component is stored in the storage unit. The inspection is performed by selecting from the part inspection data of the above.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、回路基板上に実装
された部品の外観検査方法に関し、複数枚の基板上の同
じ位置に特性が同じでも外観が異なる複数種類の部品が
それぞれ実装されている場合に、部品検査データを入れ
替える必要のない実装部品検査方法及びその装置に関す
る。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for inspecting the appearance of components mounted on a circuit board, and more particularly to a method of mounting a plurality of types of components having the same characteristics but different appearances at the same position on a plurality of boards. The present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for inspecting a mounted component which does not require replacement of component inspection data when the device is installed.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】近年、大量生産の場合、同一の部品メー
カーからの部品の安定した購入が難しくなってきた。そ
こで納期や数量の不足などを避け、少しでも低価格で部
品を購入できるように複数の部品メーカーから同じ特性
の部品を購入する多社購買が広く採用されている。この
ように多社購買の方式をとって複数の部品メーカーから
購買した部品を使用して部品の実装を行うと、特性は同
じでも、極性マークの違い、外形寸法の違いなどの外観
の相違により、実装部品の外観検査において同じ部品検
査データを使用して検査を行うことが困難になってき
た。そこで、予め複数の部品メーカーからの購買部品の
種類に応じた部品検査データをそれぞれの種類の数だけ
作成しておき、基板上に実装部品を装着するときに、基
板検査データをメーカー別の部品に該当する部品検査デ
ータに変更して検査を行っていた。
2. Description of the Related Art In recent years, in mass production, it has become difficult to stably purchase parts from the same parts manufacturer. Therefore, multi-company purchasing, in which parts having the same characteristics are purchased from a plurality of parts manufacturers, is widely adopted so that parts can be purchased at a slightly lower price while avoiding shortage of delivery time and quantity. In this way, when parts are mounted using parts purchased from multiple parts manufacturers using the multi-company purchasing method, even if the characteristics are the same, due to differences in appearance such as differences in polarity marks, differences in external dimensions, etc. Therefore, it has become difficult to perform an inspection using the same component inspection data in the appearance inspection of a mounted component. Therefore, component inspection data corresponding to the types of parts purchased from multiple component manufacturers is created in advance for each type, and when mounting components on the board, the board inspection data is converted by Inspection was performed after changing to the part inspection data corresponding to.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、購買部
品の種類が多く、その入れ替えが激しい場合は、部品を
入れ替えて基板に装着する度に、検査装置を止めて基板
検査データを装着した部品に適合する部品検査データに
変更しなければならない。したがって、購買部品の種類
が多くその入れ替えが頻繁に行われると、工程変更のた
めの不要な時間が発生し、さらに基板検査データの変更
ミスなどが発生しやすくなる。
However, if there are many types of purchased parts and the replacement is intense, every time the parts are replaced and mounted on the board, the inspection device is stopped to match the parts mounted with the board inspection data. Must be changed to part inspection data. Therefore, if there are many types of purchased parts and their replacement is frequently performed, unnecessary time for a process change is generated, and a change in board inspection data is liable to occur.

【0004】また、複数種類の購買部品が複数の基板上
の複数の位置に実装される場合、その組み合わせも多く
なり、組み合わせの数だけの基板検査データを用意する
必要があり、そのための準備の手間がかかる。例えば、
実装位置Aに部品種類数10、実装位置Bに部品種類数
5、実装位置Cに部品種類数2がそれぞれ実装されてい
る場合は、その組み合わせ数は10×5×2=100通
りにもなる。
When a plurality of types of purchased parts are mounted at a plurality of positions on a plurality of boards, the number of combinations increases, and it is necessary to prepare board inspection data for the number of combinations. It takes time and effort. For example,
When 10 component types are mounted at the mounting position A, 5 component types are mounted at the mounting position B, and 2 component types are mounted at the mounting position C, the number of combinations is as many as 10 × 5 × 2 = 100. .

【0005】本発明は、購買部品の種類が多い場合で
も、記憶手段に記憶されている複数の種類の部品検査デ
ータを用いて検査を実施することにより、基板検査デー
タを入れ替えなくてよい実装部品外観検査方法及びその
方法のための装置を提供することを目的とする。
According to the present invention, even when there are many types of purchased parts, the inspection is performed using a plurality of types of component inspection data stored in the storage means, so that the board inspection data does not need to be replaced. An object of the present invention is to provide a visual inspection method and an apparatus for the method.

【0006】[0006]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の実装部品検査方
法は、同じ特性でも外観の異なる複数種類の部品が複数
枚の基板上の同一対応位置に実装されている部品の外観
検査を行う検査方法であって、予め前記複数種類の部品
のそれぞれの種類に対応する部品検査データを記憶手段
に記憶させる工程、前記部品検査データに基づき実装さ
れている位置の検査対象部品の種類数を判別する種類数
判別工程、前記検査対象部品の外観の特徴量を抽出する
特徴量抽出工程、前記検査対象部品の特徴量に基づきそ
の部品の種類を判別する種類判別工程、及び判別した前
記検査対象部品の種類に一致した部品検査データを前記
記憶手段から選択し、その部品検査データに基づき外観
検査を行う工程を有する。
According to the present invention, there is provided a method for inspecting a mounted component in which a plurality of types of components having the same characteristics but different appearances are mounted at the same corresponding positions on a plurality of substrates. A method of storing component inspection data corresponding to each type of the plurality of types of components in a storage unit in advance, and determining the number of types of components to be inspected at a mounted position based on the component inspection data. A number-of-types determining step, a feature-amount extracting step of extracting a feature amount of the appearance of the inspection-target part, a type-determining step of determining the type of the part based on the characteristic amount of the inspection-target part, and A step of selecting component inspection data matching the type from the storage means and performing an appearance inspection based on the component inspection data.

【0007】この構成によれば、同じ特性でも外観の異
なる複数種類の部品が複数枚の基板上の同一対応位置に
実装されている実装基板の検査において、記憶手段に基
板検査データとして、予め多社購買部品の種類数だけの
部品検査データを記憶させている。そして、複数種類の
部品が実装された位置の検査の際に、まず部品の特徴量
を自動的に判別し、その判別した特徴量によりその部品
に適合した部品検査データを自動的に選択して実装部品
検査を行うことができる。その結果、同じ位置に実装さ
れる部品の種類(メーカー)が変わった場合において
も、基板検査データを入れ替えることが不要となり、検
査装置を一次停止したり、基板検査データを入れ替える
際の煩雑な作業やミスを防止できる。
According to this configuration, when inspecting a mounted board in which a plurality of types of parts having the same characteristics but different appearances are mounted at the same corresponding positions on a plurality of boards, a large number of pieces of board inspection data are stored in the storage means in advance. Parts inspection data for the number of types of parts purchased by the company are stored. Then, when inspecting the position where a plurality of types of components are mounted, first, the feature amount of the component is automatically determined, and the component inspection data suitable for the component is automatically selected based on the determined feature amount. Inspection of mounted components can be performed. As a result, even if the type (manufacturer) of the component mounted at the same position changes, it is not necessary to replace the board inspection data, and the troublesome work of temporarily stopping the inspection device or replacing the board inspection data is eliminated. And mistakes can be prevented.

【0008】上記構成の実装部品検査方法において、複
数枚の基板を順次検査する場合、n枚目以降の基板の検
査においてn−1枚目の基板の検査で選択された部品検
査データを使用して検査を実施し、検査の結果不良の判
別をした場合に、前記特徴量抽出工程及び前記種類判別
工程を実施し、判別した検査対象部品の種類に一致した
部品検査データを選択して検査を行うのが好ましい。一
枚ごとに実装されている部品の種類が異なることは殆ど
ないため、n枚目以降の特徴量抽出工程及び種類判別工
程を省略できる。
In the mounted component inspection method having the above configuration, when sequentially inspecting a plurality of substrates, the inspection of the nth and subsequent substrates uses the component inspection data selected in the inspection of the (n-1) th substrate. In the case where a defect is determined as a result of the inspection, the feature amount extracting step and the type determining step are performed, and component inspection data that matches the type of the determined inspection target component is selected to perform the inspection. It is preferred to do so. Since there is almost no difference in the types of components mounted on each sheet, it is possible to omit the feature amount extraction step and the type determination step for the nth and subsequent sheets.

【0009】本発明の他の観点による実装部品検査方法
は、同じ特性でも外観の異なる複数種類の部品が複数枚
の基板上の同一対応位置に実装されている部品の外観検
査を行う検査方法であって、予め前記複数種類の部品の
それぞれの種類に対応する部品検査データを記憶手段に
記憶させる工程、前記部品検査データに基づき実装され
ている位置の検査対象部品の種類数を判別する種類数判
別工程、前記複数種類の部品が実装されている位置の検
査対象部品の検査を行う際に、複数種類の部品検査デー
タを用いて順次前記検査対象部品の検査を実施する工
程、及びそれぞれの部品検査データによる検査結果から
前記検査対象部品の良否を判別する良否判別工程を有し
ている。
A method for inspecting a mounted component according to another aspect of the present invention is an inspection method for inspecting the appearance of components in which a plurality of types of components having the same characteristics but different appearances are mounted at the same corresponding positions on a plurality of substrates. Storing the component inspection data corresponding to each type of the plurality of types of components in a storage unit in advance; and determining the number of types of the component to be inspected at a mounted position based on the component inspection data. Discriminating step, a step of sequentially inspecting the inspection target component using a plurality of types of component inspection data when inspecting the inspection target component at a position where the plurality of types of components are mounted, and each component A quality determining step of determining the quality of the inspection target component from the inspection result based on the inspection data;

【0010】この構成によれば、複数種類の部品検査デ
ータを用いて順次検査しているので、良品となった時点
で以降の検査を省略することができる。また、特徴量抽
出による種類判別工程を省略できる。上記構成の実装部
品検査方法において、前記良否判別工程において前記そ
れぞれの部品検査データによる検査結果に所定の重み付
けを実施し、重み付けした検査結果から前記検査対象部
品の良否を判別するのが望ましい。これにより、部品の
種類判別の際に発生する判別誤差を小さくすることが可
能となり、より検査精度の向上を図れる。また、この検
査方法に特徴量抽出の工程を加えて、(1)特徴量抽出
により判別された部品の検査結果の重みを大きくするこ
と、(2)あるいは特徴量との相関の度合に応じて部品
の検査結果の重みを変更すること、でさらに検査精度の
向上が図れる。
According to this configuration, since the inspection is performed sequentially using a plurality of types of component inspection data, the subsequent inspection can be omitted when a non-defective product is obtained. In addition, a type discrimination step by extracting a feature amount can be omitted. In the mounted component inspection method having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that in the pass / fail determination step, a predetermined weight is applied to the inspection result based on the respective component inspection data, and the pass / fail of the inspection target component is determined from the weighted inspection result. As a result, it is possible to reduce the discrimination error that occurs when discriminating the type of the component, and it is possible to further improve the inspection accuracy. In addition, a feature amount extraction step is added to this inspection method to (1) increase the weight of the inspection result of the component determined by the feature amount extraction, or (2) or increase the degree of correlation with the feature amount. By changing the weight of the inspection result of the component, the inspection accuracy can be further improved.

【0011】[0011]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明の実装部品検査方法
の好適な実施例について添付の図面を参照しつつ説明す
る。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS A preferred embodiment of the mounted component inspection method according to the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

【0012】《実施例1》図1は、本発明の実施例1の
実装部品検査方法による実装基板外観検査装置の構成を
示すブロック図である。図1において、実装基板2上の
4箇所に、部品A 11、部品B 12、部品C13、部
品D 14を搭載したものが、図示されていない移動機
構で移動する外観測定センサー1によりそれぞれ測定さ
れ、センサー1は測定データ3を出力する。実施例1の
場合、実装基板2に実装されている部品A 11は、4
社(Ap社、Aq社、Ar社、As社)からの購買部品
であり、実装基板2には4種類の部品A 11が実装さ
れている。部品Dは、2社(Dp社、Dq社)からの購
買部品であり、実装基板2には2種類の部品D 14が
実装されている。部品Bと部品Cとはそれぞれ1社(B
p社、Cp社)からの購買部品であり、どの基板にもそ
れぞれ同種の部品B 12と部品C 13が実装されてい
る。
Embodiment 1 FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a mounted board appearance inspection apparatus by a mounted component inspection method according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention. In FIG. 1, components A 11, component B 12, component C 13, and component D 14 are mounted at four locations on a mounting board 2, and are respectively measured by the appearance measurement sensor 1 that is moved by a moving mechanism (not shown). , The sensor 1 outputs measurement data 3. In the case of the first embodiment, the component A 11 mounted on the mounting board 2 is 4
(Ap, Aq, Ar, As), and four types of components A11 are mounted on the mounting board 2. The component D is a purchased component from two companies (Dp and Dq), and two types of components D14 are mounted on the mounting board 2. Parts B and C are each one company (B
(Company p, Company Cp), and the same type of component B12 and component C13 are mounted on each board.

【0013】一方実装される複数種類の部品A 11〜
D 14に対応するそれぞれの部品検査データ(11a
〜14b)は、予め基板検査データ4として記憶装置5
に記憶させる。種類数判別部6aは、記憶装置5に記憶
されている基板検査データ4から,基板上のそれぞれの
位置に実装されている部品の種類数を判別する。判別し
た部品の種類数が複数であった場合は、特徴量抽出部6
bが外観測定センサー1で測定した寸法、明るさなどの
測定データ3から特徴量を抽出する。また種類判別部6
cが、その特徴量抽出部6bで抽出した特徴量と基板検
査データ4の中のそれぞれの部品検査用基準データとを
比較し、検査対象部品の種類を判別する。検査部7は、
基板検査データ4の中から検査対象部品の種類に対応す
る部品検査用基準データと測定データ3とを比較照合
し、その良否を判別して検査結果8を得る。
On the other hand, a plurality of types of components A 11 to 11 to be mounted
D14 corresponding to each component inspection data (11a
14b) are stored in advance in the storage device 5 as the board inspection data 4.
To memorize. The number-of-types determining unit 6a determines the number of types of components mounted at respective positions on the board from the board inspection data 4 stored in the storage device 5. If there are a plurality of types of discriminated parts, the feature amount extraction unit 6
b extracts a feature amount from measurement data 3 such as dimensions and brightness measured by the appearance measurement sensor 1. Also, a type discriminating unit 6
c compares the feature quantity extracted by the feature quantity extraction unit 6b with the respective component inspection reference data in the board inspection data 4 to determine the type of the component to be inspected. The inspection unit 7
From the board inspection data 4, the reference data for component inspection corresponding to the type of the component to be inspected is compared with the measurement data 3, and the quality is determined to obtain an inspection result 8.

【0014】図2は、実施例1の実装部品検査方法にお
ける記憶装置5に記憶されている基板検査データ4の構
成を示すブロック図である。部品Aの4種類の部品検査
データ11a〜11d及び部品Dの2種類の部品検査デ
ータ14a〜14bには、それぞれの購買先(Ap社〜
Dq社)の部品の特徴量を表す複数のデータ及び検査項
目に対応したデータが収められている。これらの特徴量
データは、例えば、部品表面からの反射光データ、ラベ
ルの印刷データ、極性マークの種別データ、部品高さデ
ータなどである。
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the structure of the board inspection data 4 stored in the storage device 5 in the mounted component inspection method according to the first embodiment. The four types of component inspection data 11a to 11d of the component A and the two types of component inspection data 14a to 14b of the component D include respective suppliers (Ap.
Dq) stores a plurality of data representing the feature values of parts and data corresponding to inspection items. These feature amount data are, for example, reflected light data from the component surface, label print data, polarity mark type data, component height data, and the like.

【0015】次に、図3のフローチャートを参照して、
実施例1の実装部品検査方法について説明する。図3に
示すように、ステップS1においては、使用されている
4社の部品A、1社の部品B、1社の部品C、及び2社
の部品Dのそれぞれの特徴量を含む部品検査用基準デー
タ11a〜14bを抽出して記憶装置5に記憶させる。
ステップS2において、基板にそれぞれ実装されている
部品A〜部品Dが複数社からの購買部品か否かを判別す
る。この判別は、例えば部品Aの基板検査データに収め
られていている部品検査用基準データ11a〜11dの
数を用いて実施される。ステップS3においては、部品
Bや部品Cのように複数社からの購買部品ではないもの
は、それぞれ1種類の部品検査データ12a,13aを
用いて検査し、判別結果を出力する。
Next, referring to the flowchart of FIG.
A mounting component inspection method according to the first embodiment will be described. As shown in FIG. 3, in step S <b> 1, a part inspection component including the feature amounts of the four parts A, 1 part B, 1 part C, and 2 parts D used is used. The reference data 11a to 14b are extracted and stored in the storage device 5.
In step S2, it is determined whether the components A to D mounted on the board are purchased from a plurality of companies. This determination is performed using the number of the component inspection reference data 11a to 11d contained in the board inspection data of the component A, for example. In step S3, components not purchased from a plurality of companies, such as component B and component C, are inspected using one type of component inspection data 12a and 13a, respectively, and a determination result is output.

【0016】ステップS3において、部品Aや部品Dの
ように複数社からの購買部品の場合は、図1に示す外観
の測定データ3から検査対象部品の特徴量を抽出する。
それらの特徴量は、ステップS4において、それぞれの
部品検査データ11a〜14bに収められている特徴量
データと比較され、どの社の部品であるかの判別がされ
る。種類判別ステップS5においては、判別された種類
の部品検査データを抽出する。部品検査ステップS6に
おいては、抽出した部品検査データを用いて検査を実施
し、その検査結果を出力する。
In step S3, in the case of parts purchased from a plurality of companies, such as part A and part D, the feature quantity of the part to be inspected is extracted from the measured appearance data 3 shown in FIG.
These feature amounts are compared with the feature amount data contained in the respective component inspection data 11a to 14b in step S4, and it is determined which component the component belongs to. In the type determining step S5, the determined type of component inspection data is extracted. In the component inspection step S6, an inspection is performed using the extracted component inspection data, and the inspection result is output.

【0017】このように、実施例1の検査方法によれ
ば、特徴量データにより実装されている部品の種類を判
別し、記憶装置5(図1)に記憶されている基板検査デ
ータから、その種類の部品検査データを選択して検査で
きる。その結果、基板検査データとして,実装されてい
る部品の種類に適合した部品検査データを入れ替えるこ
とが不要となり、検査装置を一次停止することが必要な
い。したがって検査時間を短縮できるとともに,基板検
査データを入れ替える際の煩雑な作業やミスを防止でき
る。
As described above, according to the inspection method of the first embodiment, the type of the mounted component is determined based on the feature amount data, and the type is determined from the board inspection data stored in the storage device 5 (FIG. 1). It is possible to select and inspect various types of component inspection data. As a result, it is not necessary to replace the component inspection data suitable for the type of the mounted component as the board inspection data, and it is not necessary to temporarily stop the inspection device. Therefore, the inspection time can be shortened, and complicated operations and mistakes when replacing the substrate inspection data can be prevented.

【0018】実施例1の実装部品検査方法において、複
数枚の基板を順次検査する場合は、まず、1枚目の基板
検査において特徴量抽出を行う。引き続く2枚目以降の
基板検査では、1枚目で抽出した部品検査データを用い
て検査する。このような検査の仕方で、検査結果が不良
となった場合にのみ特徴量抽出を行い、その特徴量に適
合した部品検査用基準データを用いるようにするのが好
ましい。こうすることにより、特徴量抽出に費やす時間
を短くしてさらに検査時間を短縮することができる。
When sequentially inspecting a plurality of boards in the mounted component inspection method of the first embodiment, first, feature amounts are extracted in the first board inspection. In the subsequent board inspection for the second and subsequent boards, the board is inspected using the component inspection data extracted for the first board. In such an inspection method, it is preferable to extract the characteristic amount only when the inspection result becomes defective, and to use the component inspection reference data suitable for the characteristic amount. By doing so, it is possible to shorten the time spent for feature amount extraction and further reduce the inspection time.

【0019】この場合に、特徴量抽出を行って決定した
部品検査データが1枚目の部品検査データと同じ場合、
再検査を行わずに不良と判別することにより、さらなる
検査時間の短縮をはかれる。複数のメーカーからの購買
部品は、通常基板1枚ごとにその部品の種類が変更され
ることはないので、このように特徴量抽出を省略するこ
とで検査時間の短縮がはかれる。
In this case, if the component inspection data determined by performing the feature extraction is the same as the first component inspection data,
By determining the defect without performing the reinspection, the inspection time can be further reduced. Since the types of parts purchased from a plurality of manufacturers are not usually changed for each board, the inspection time can be shortened by omitting the feature quantity extraction.

【0020】《実施例2》図4は、本発明の実施例2の
実装部品検査方法のフローチートである。実施例2は実
施例1のものと比較して、複数社からの購買部品と判別
されたステップ以降の検査の流れのみが異なるものであ
る。したがって、図1〜図3での実施例1と同様の部分
についての重複する説明は省略する。図4に示すよう
に、実施例2の実装部品検査方法は、ステップS6にお
いて、複数社からの購買部品の場合には、予め基板検査
データとして記憶装置5に記憶されている部品検査デー
タ11a〜11dを順次用いてステップS6a〜ステッ
プS6dの検査を実施する。ここで、例えばAp社部品
検査データ11aを用いた検査で良品となれば、実装さ
れている部品はAp社の部品Aとして合格と判別する。
Embodiment 2 FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a method for inspecting a mounted component according to a second embodiment of the present invention. The second embodiment is different from the first embodiment only in the flow of inspection after the step of determining that a part is purchased from a plurality of companies. Therefore, a duplicate description of the same parts as those in the first embodiment in FIGS. 1 to 3 will be omitted. As shown in FIG. 4, in the mounted component inspection method according to the second embodiment, in step S6, in the case of purchased components from a plurality of companies, the component inspection data 11a to 11a to 11 stored in advance in the storage device 5 as board inspection data. The inspection of steps S6a to S6d is performed by using 11d sequentially. Here, for example, if a non-defective product is inspected using the Ap component inspection data 11a, the mounted component is determined to be acceptable as the Ap component A.

【0021】このように、少なくとも1つの部品検査デ
ータ11aで良品と判別された場合には検査対象部品の
検査結果を合格とすることで、以降の部品検査データ1
1b〜11dを用いたステップ6a〜ステップ6dの検
査を省略できる。その結果、検査時間の短縮をはかるこ
とができる。また、特徴量抽出も行わないため、特徴量
抽出や部品検査データの判別等のステップに費やす時間
を省略できる。
As described above, when it is determined that at least one component inspection data 11a is a non-defective product, the inspection result of the component to be inspected is passed, and the subsequent component inspection data 1a.
The inspection in Steps 6a to 6d using 1b to 11d can be omitted. As a result, the inspection time can be reduced. In addition, since the feature amount is not extracted, the time spent on the steps of extracting the feature amount and determining the component inspection data can be omitted.

【0022】図4の実施例2の実装部品検査方法におい
て、それぞれの部品検査データによる検査結果から総合
的に判断する方法として、図1に点線で示す重み付け部
9により検査結果に対して重み付けをする方法がある。
重み付けの方法としては、例えば、測定データから特徴
量を抽出し、その特徴量により判別される部品検査デー
タによる検査結果の重みを大きくする方法がある。具体
的には、図2に示すように、部品Aの測定データから抽
出した部品表面からの反射光データから判別した部品の
種類がAq社のものであれば、部品検査データ11bに
基づく検査結果の重みを大きくする。
In the mounted component inspection method according to the second embodiment shown in FIG. 4, as a method for comprehensively judging from the inspection results based on the respective component inspection data, weighting is performed on the inspection results by a weighting unit 9 shown by a dotted line in FIG. There is a way to do that.
As a weighting method, for example, there is a method of extracting a characteristic amount from measurement data and increasing the weight of an inspection result based on component inspection data determined based on the characteristic amount. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 2, if the type of the component determined from the reflected light data from the component surface extracted from the measurement data of the component A is that of Aq, the inspection result based on the component inspection data 11b The weight of.

【0023】また、別の重み付けの方法としては、測定
データから抽出された特徴量とそれぞれの部品検査デー
タが有する特徴量とを比較して相関関係を求め、その相
関関係の強弱に応じてそれぞれの部品検査データに基づ
く検査結果に重みを付ける方法がある。具体的には、部
品Aの測定データから抽出した部品表面からの反射光デ
ータが、それぞれの部品検査データ11a〜11dの有
する反射光データの中でAr社のものと相関関係が強い
場合は、部品検査データ11cに基づく検査結果の重み
を大きくする。これにより、特徴量による部品の種類判
別の際に発生する判別誤差を小さくすることが可能とな
り、より検査精度の向上を図ることができる。
As another weighting method, a correlation is obtained by comparing a characteristic amount extracted from the measured data with a characteristic amount of each part inspection data, and the correlation is determined according to the strength of the correlation. There is a method of weighting the inspection result based on the component inspection data. Specifically, when the reflected light data from the component surface extracted from the measurement data of the component A has a strong correlation with that of the Ar company in the reflected light data of the respective component inspection data 11a to 11d, The weight of the inspection result based on the component inspection data 11c is increased. As a result, it is possible to reduce a discrimination error generated when discriminating the type of the component based on the feature amount, and it is possible to further improve the inspection accuracy.

【0024】《実施例3》実施例3の実装部品検査方法
は、検査時間、多社購買部品の種類数、検査精度を考慮
し、多社購買の検査対象部品ごとに、実施例1及び実施
例2の実装基板検査方法のうちどの方法を使用するかを
設定する方法である。これにより、その実装基板の検査
に最適な検査を実施することができる。例えば、その日
に使用される多社購買部品の種類が分かっている場合
は、使用しない部品検査データを予め定めておくことに
より、検査時間の短縮、検査精度の向上を図ることがで
きる。
<< Embodiment 3 >> The mounting component inspection method of Embodiment 3 takes into account the inspection time, the number of types of parts purchased by multiple companies, and the inspection accuracy. This is a method for setting which of the mounting board inspection methods of Example 2 is to be used. This makes it possible to carry out an inspection that is optimal for the inspection of the mounting board. For example, when the type of a multi-company purchased part used on the day is known, the inspection time can be shortened and the inspection accuracy can be improved by previously determining the unused part inspection data.

【0025】[0025]

【発明の効果】以上実施例で詳細に説明したように、複
数の種類の購買部品が複数枚の基板に実装されている基
板の検査において、異なる部品メーカーの異なる種類の
部品に入れ替えが発生した場合でも、基板検査データを
入れ替えることなく実装基板の検査を行うことができ
る。その結果、基板検査データの入れ替えの際に発生す
る時間ロスや、基板検査データの入れ替えミスをなく
し、高効率、高精度な検査が可能となる。
As described in detail in the above embodiments, in the inspection of a board in which a plurality of kinds of purchased parts are mounted on a plurality of boards, replacement of different kinds of parts by different parts manufacturers has occurred. Even in this case, the mounted board can be inspected without replacing the board inspection data. As a result, it is possible to eliminate a time loss occurring at the time of replacing the board inspection data and a mistake in replacing the board inspection data, thereby enabling a highly efficient and accurate inspection.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の実施例の実装基板外観検査装置の構成
を示すブロック図
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a mounting board appearance inspection apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】実施例1の基板検査データの構成を示すブロッ
ク図
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of board inspection data according to the first embodiment.

【図3】本発明の実施例1の実装基板査方法のフロー図FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a mounting board inspection method according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

【図4】本発明の実施例2の実装基板査方法のフロー図FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a mounting board inspection method according to a second embodiment of the present invention.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 外観測定センサー 2 実装基板 3 測定データ 4 基板検査データ 5 記憶装置 6a 種類数判別部 6b 特徴量抽出部 6c 種類判別部 7 検査部 9 重み付け部 11 部品A 11a Ap社の部品検査データ 11b Aq社の部品検査データ 11c Ar社の部品検査データ 11d As社の部品検査データ 12 部品B 12a Bp社の部品検査データ 13 部品C 13a Cp社の部品検査データ 14 部品D 14a Dp社の部品検査データ 14b Dq社の部品検査データ DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Appearance measurement sensor 2 Mounting board 3 Measurement data 4 Board inspection data 5 Storage device 6a Type number discriminating unit 6b Feature amount extracting unit 6c Type discriminating unit 7 Inspection unit 9 Weighting unit 11 Part A 11a Part inspection data of Ap company 11b Aq company Part inspection data 11c Ar company's inspection data 11d As company's inspection data 12 Part B 12a Bp's inspection data 13 Component C 13a Cp's inspection data 14 Component D 14a Dp's inspection data 14b Dq Parts inspection data

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 永井 大介 香川県高松市古新町8番地の1 松下寿電 子工業株式会社内 ────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuing from the front page (72) Inventor Daisuke Nagai 8-1, Koshinmachi, Takamatsu City, Kagawa Prefecture

Claims (15)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 同じ特性でも外観の異なる複数種類の部
品が複数枚の基板上の同一対応位置に実装されている部
品の外観検査を行う検査方法であって、 予め前記複数種類の部品のそれぞれの種類に対応する部
品検査データを記憶手段に記憶させる工程、 前記部品検査データに基づき実装されている位置の検査
対象部品の種類数を判別する種類数判別工程、 前記検査対象部品の外観の特徴量を抽出する特徴量抽出
工程、 前記検査対象部品の特徴量に基づきその部品の種類を判
別する種類判別工程、及び判別した前記検査対象部品の
種類に一致した部品検査データを前記記憶手段から選択
し、その部品検査データに基づき外観検査を行う工程を
有することを特徴とする実装部品検査方法。
An inspection method for performing an appearance inspection of a component in which a plurality of types of components having the same characteristics but different appearances are mounted at the same corresponding positions on a plurality of substrates, wherein each of the plurality of types of components is previously determined. Storing the component inspection data corresponding to the type of the component in the storage means, determining the number of types of the component to be inspected at the mounted position based on the component inspection data, and distinguishing the appearance of the component to be inspected. A feature value extracting step of extracting a quantity; a type determining step of determining the type of the component based on the feature value of the component to be inspected; and component inspection data matching the determined type of the component to be inspected is selected from the storage unit. And a step of performing an appearance inspection based on the component inspection data.
【請求項2】 前記検査対象部品の外観の特徴量が、そ
の部品の表面状態による光反射量の相違量であることを
特徴とする請求項1記載の実装部品検査方法。
2. The mounting component inspection method according to claim 1, wherein the characteristic amount of the appearance of the inspection target component is a difference amount of a light reflection amount depending on a surface state of the component.
【請求項3】 前記検査対象部品の外観の特徴量が、そ
の部品の表面に印刷されたパターンの相違量であること
を特徴とする請求項1記載の実装部品検査方法。
3. The mounting component inspection method according to claim 1, wherein the feature amount of the appearance of the inspection target component is a difference amount of a pattern printed on a surface of the component.
【請求項4】 前記検査対象部品の外観の特徴量が、そ
の部品の極性マークの表示状態の相違量であることを特
徴とする請求項1記載の実装部品検査方法。
4. The mounting component inspection method according to claim 1, wherein the feature amount of the appearance of the inspection target component is a difference amount of a display state of a polarity mark of the component.
【請求項5】 前記検査対象部品の外観の特徴量が、そ
の部品の高さ寸法の相違量であることを特徴とする請求
項1記載の実装部品検査方法。
5. The mounting component inspection method according to claim 1, wherein the characteristic amount of the appearance of the inspection target component is a difference in height dimension of the component.
【請求項6】 複数枚の基板を順次検査する場合、 n枚目以降の基板の検査においてn−1枚目の基板の検
査で選択された部品検査データを使用して検査を実施
し、 検査の結果不良の判別をした場合に、前記特徴量抽出工
程及び前記種類判別工程を実施し、 判別した検査対象部品の種類に一致した部品検査データ
を選択して検査を行うことを特徴とする請求項1記載の
実装部品検査方法。
6. In the case of sequentially inspecting a plurality of substrates, in the inspection of the nth and subsequent substrates, the inspection is performed using the component inspection data selected in the inspection of the (n-1) th substrate. When the defect is determined as a result, the characteristic amount extracting step and the type determining step are performed, and the inspection is performed by selecting the component inspection data that matches the type of the determined inspection target component. Item 1. The mounting component inspection method according to Item 1.
【請求項7】 n枚目の基板の検査対象部品を不良と判
別した場合に、前記不良と判別した検査対象部品の種類
と前記n−1枚目のそれに対応する部品の種類とが同じ
ときに、 検査を行わずに不良の判別をすることを特徴とする請求
項6記載の実装部品検査方法。
7. When the inspection target component on the n-th board is determined to be defective, when the type of the inspection target component determined to be defective is the same as the type of the corresponding component of the (n-1) th substrate 7. The mounting component inspection method according to claim 6, wherein a defect is determined without performing an inspection.
【請求項8】 同じ特性でも外観の異なる複数種類の部
品が複数枚の基板上の同一対応位置に実装されている部
品の外観検査を行う検査方法であって、 予め前記複数種類の部品のそれぞれの種類に対応する部
品検査データを記憶手段に記憶させる工程、 前記部品検査データに基づき実装されている位置の検査
対象部品の種類数を判別する種類数判別工程、 前記複数種類の部品が実装されている位置の検査対象部
品の検査を行う際に、複数種類の部品検査データを用い
て順次前記検査対象部品の検査を実施する工程、及びそ
れぞれの部品検査データによる検査結果から前記検査対
象部品の良否を判別する良否判別工程を有することを特
徴とする実装部品検査方法。
8. An inspection method for performing an appearance inspection of a component in which a plurality of types of components having the same characteristics but different appearances are mounted at the same corresponding positions on a plurality of substrates, wherein each of the plurality of types of components is previously determined. Storing the component inspection data corresponding to the type of the component in the storage unit; a type number determining step of determining the number of types of the inspection target component at the mounted position based on the component inspection data; A step of sequentially inspecting the inspection target component using a plurality of types of component inspection data when inspecting the inspection target component at the position where the inspection target component is located, and the inspection result of the inspection target component based on the inspection result based on the respective component inspection data. A method for inspecting a mounted component, comprising a pass / fail judgment step of judging pass / fail.
【請求項9】 前記良否判別工程において、 前記それぞれの部品検査データによる検査結果のうち、
一つでも良の検査結果が得られた場合に前記検査対象部
品の検査結果を良品と判別することを特徴とする請求項
8記載の実装部品検査方法。
9. In the pass / fail determination step, among the inspection results based on the respective part inspection data,
9. The mounting component inspection method according to claim 8, wherein when at least one good inspection result is obtained, the inspection result of the inspection target component is determined as a non-defective product.
【請求項10】 前記良否判別工程において、 前記それぞれの部品検査データによる検査結果に所定の
重み付けを実施し、 重み付けした検査結果から前記検査対象部品の良否を判
別することを特徴とする請求項8記載の実装部品検査方
法。
10. The quality determination step, wherein a predetermined weight is applied to an inspection result based on the respective component inspection data, and the quality of the inspection target component is determined based on the weighted inspection result. The mounting component inspection method described.
【請求項11】 前記所定の重み付けが、 前記複数種類の部品の特徴量を抽出して、特徴量に基づ
き選択された部品検査データに基づく検査結果の重み付
けを大きくすることであることを特徴とする請求項10
記載の実装部品検査方法。
11. The method according to claim 11, wherein the predetermined weighting is to extract feature amounts of the plurality of types of components and increase weight of an inspection result based on component inspection data selected based on the feature amounts. Claim 10
The mounting component inspection method described.
【請求項12】 前記所定の重み付けが、 前記複数種類から抽出した特徴量と部品検査データの特
徴量との相関関係の強い部品検査データに基づく検査結
果の重みを大きくすることであることを特徴とする請求
項10記載の実装部品検査方法。
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined weighting is to increase a weight of an inspection result based on component inspection data having a strong correlation between the feature amount extracted from the plurality of types and the feature amount of the component inspection data. The method for inspecting a mounted component according to claim 10.
【請求項13】 検査対象部品ごとに検査方法を選択し
て実施する請求項1又は請求項8のいずれかに記載の実
装部品検査方法。
13. The mounting component inspection method according to claim 1, wherein an inspection method is selected and performed for each inspection target component.
【請求項14】 基板上の同じ位置に特性は同じでも外
観の異なる複数種類の検査対象部品が実装されている実
装基板の外観検査を行う装置であって、 前記検査対象部品の外観及び寸法を測定する外観測定セ
ンサー、 予め前記複数種類の部品に対応するそれぞれの部品検査
データを記憶させておく記憶手段、 前記部品検査データに基づき前記検査対象部品の種類数
を判別する手段、 前記判別手段で判別した検査対象部品が複数種類であっ
た場合に、前記外観測定センサーで測定した測定データ
から特徴量を抽出する手段、 前記特徴量と前記記憶手段に記憶されている前記部品検
査データとを比較して前記検査対象部品の種類を判別す
る手段、及び判別した前記検査対象部品の種類に対応す
る前記部品検査データを前記記憶手段から選択し、その
部品検査データに基づき検査を実施する検査手段を有す
ることを特徴とする実装部品検査装置。
14. An apparatus for inspecting the appearance of a mounting board on which a plurality of types of inspected components having the same characteristics but different appearances are mounted at the same position on the substrate, wherein the inspected component has an external appearance and dimensions. An appearance measurement sensor for measuring, storage means for storing in advance respective component inspection data corresponding to the plurality of types of components, means for determining the number of types of the inspection target component based on the component inspection data, Means for extracting a feature amount from the measurement data measured by the appearance measurement sensor when there are a plurality of types of inspected parts determined, comparing the feature amount with the component inspection data stored in the storage means Means for determining the type of the inspection target component, and selecting the component inspection data corresponding to the determined type of the inspection target component from the storage unit, It mounted component inspection device, characterized in that it comprises a checking means for performing, based on the component inspection data inspection.
【請求項15】 前記検査手段において前記それぞれの
部品検査データによる検査結果に所定の重み付けを実施
する重み付け部を有することを特徴とする請求項14記
載の実装部品検査装置。
15. The mounting component inspection apparatus according to claim 14, further comprising a weighting unit that performs a predetermined weighting on an inspection result based on the respective component inspection data in the inspection unit.
JP2001097037A 2001-03-29 2001-03-29 Mounting component inspection method Expired - Fee Related JP4643848B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001097037A JP4643848B2 (en) 2001-03-29 2001-03-29 Mounting component inspection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001097037A JP4643848B2 (en) 2001-03-29 2001-03-29 Mounting component inspection method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2002299900A true JP2002299900A (en) 2002-10-11
JP4643848B2 JP4643848B2 (en) 2011-03-02

Family

ID=18950870

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2001097037A Expired - Fee Related JP4643848B2 (en) 2001-03-29 2001-03-29 Mounting component inspection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4643848B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE112010000701T5 (en) 2009-01-23 2012-10-31 Panasonic Corp. Component assembly line and component mounting method
US10455750B2 (en) 2015-01-20 2019-10-22 Fuji Corporation Inspection support device and inspection support method

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS63257808A (en) * 1987-04-16 1988-10-25 Hitachi Ltd Parts installation inspection device
JPH04259849A (en) * 1991-02-15 1992-09-16 Toshiba Corp Inspecting apparatus
JPH06125196A (en) * 1992-10-12 1994-05-06 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Component mounting method
JPH07326900A (en) * 1994-05-30 1995-12-12 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Component inspection method when replenishing components in electronic component mounters
JPH09152317A (en) * 1995-12-01 1997-06-10 Omron Corp Method and apparatus for inspection of mounting component

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS63257808A (en) * 1987-04-16 1988-10-25 Hitachi Ltd Parts installation inspection device
JPH04259849A (en) * 1991-02-15 1992-09-16 Toshiba Corp Inspecting apparatus
JPH06125196A (en) * 1992-10-12 1994-05-06 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Component mounting method
JPH07326900A (en) * 1994-05-30 1995-12-12 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Component inspection method when replenishing components in electronic component mounters
JPH09152317A (en) * 1995-12-01 1997-06-10 Omron Corp Method and apparatus for inspection of mounting component

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE112010000701T5 (en) 2009-01-23 2012-10-31 Panasonic Corp. Component assembly line and component mounting method
US8849442B2 (en) 2009-01-23 2014-09-30 Panasonic Corporation Component mounting line and component mounting method
US10455750B2 (en) 2015-01-20 2019-10-22 Fuji Corporation Inspection support device and inspection support method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4643848B2 (en) 2011-03-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN1862259B (en) Inspection standard setting device and method, and process inspection device
CN100432622C (en) Printing solder detecting device
US20160054296A1 (en) Pre-calibrated replaceable sensor module for a breath alcohol testing device
CN102514768B (en) Wire harness quality detection method
JPH07114601A (en) Manufacturing defect analysis system, method, and database generation method related thereto
JP2004214394A (en) Implementation quality analysis method
JP4712607B2 (en) Sensitivity file automatic setting device and article visual inspection device equipped with the same
JP4643848B2 (en) Mounting component inspection method
JP2005268777A (en) Printed circuit board processing system {PCBwork-system}
JPH05332948A (en) Defective part indicator in mounting board appearance inspection
JPH04287274A (en) Quality information management system for electronic devices equipped with printed circuit boards
JPH11295375A (en) Method for eliminating contact resistance in electrically inspecting device for wiring board
CN100425970C (en) Weighing detection method and system
TWI280510B (en) Inspection method and system of component defect
US20020138219A1 (en) Quality assurance automatic display system
JP3691925B2 (en) Soldering appearance inspection apparatus and soldering appearance inspection method
JP4723124B2 (en) How to generate position data
JPH0989969A (en) Short-circuit part detecting system, short-circuit part detecting device, and method of detecting short-circuit part
Mahmood Manufacturing problem solving methodology analytic. A case study of leakage current in a production company
JP3524254B2 (en) Method for detecting displacement of substrate to be inspected by pattern matching method
JP2980695B2 (en) How to print inspection data on a measuring device
JP2007271439A (en) Automatic identification inspection system and control method therefor
CN118549435A (en) An automatic optical inspection process
JP2005286015A (en) Mounting quality factor analysis method
JP2000241298A (en) Inspection system and method for editing inspection result data

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20050526

RD03 Notification of appointment of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7423

Effective date: 20061129

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080219

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20100914

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100921

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20101102

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20101124

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20101203

R150 Certificate of patent (=grant) or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131210

Year of fee payment: 3

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees