GB2416834A - A method of measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance - Google Patents
A method of measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2416834A GB2416834A GB0417247A GB0417247A GB2416834A GB 2416834 A GB2416834 A GB 2416834A GB 0417247 A GB0417247 A GB 0417247A GB 0417247 A GB0417247 A GB 0417247A GB 2416834 A GB2416834 A GB 2416834A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- spectral reflectance
- reflectance data
- lustre
- cie
- reflected light
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/55—Specular reflectivity
- G01N21/57—Measuring gloss
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01J—MEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
- G01J3/00—Spectrometry; Spectrophotometry; Monochromators; Measuring colours
- G01J3/02—Details
- G01J3/0205—Optical elements not provided otherwise, e.g. optical manifolds, diffusers, windows
- G01J3/0251—Colorimeters making use of an integrating sphere
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01J—MEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
- G01J3/00—Spectrometry; Spectrophotometry; Monochromators; Measuring colours
- G01J3/02—Details
- G01J3/0289—Field-of-view determination; Aiming or pointing of a spectrometer; Adjusting alignment; Encoding angular position; Size of measurement area; Position tracking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01J—MEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
- G01J3/00—Spectrometry; Spectrophotometry; Monochromators; Measuring colours
- G01J3/46—Measurement of colour; Colour measuring devices, e.g. colorimeters
- G01J3/462—Computing operations in or between colour spaces; Colour management systems
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)
- Spectrometry And Color Measurement (AREA)
Abstract
A method comprising the steps of: a) determining the intensity of the various wavelengths of the light reflected from an area of a surface; b) producing from the reflected light measurements; a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light included, and a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light excluded; c) converting each set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates into its tristimulus values; d) converting the tristimulus values for each set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates into spectral reflectance data, and d) converting spectral reflectance data for each of the tristimulus values into lustre measurement for the surface which is a function of the difference between the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded. A computer program product may be used to perform steps b, c, d, and e. A measuring guide 10 having an aperture 12, and angular graduation lines 13 may be used to orient a spectrophotometer, used for this method, in a correct way.
Description
24 1 6834 A Method and Apparatus for IVIeasuring Lustre
Field of the Invention
The present invention concerns a method of measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance and to apparatus suitable for performing the method.
The method is of particular benefit in the surface coating industry e.g. for printing and packaging.
Background of the Invention
The use of metallic printing inks, particularly silver in the packaging industry, is becoming increasingly popular as a high impact visual effect. New types of metallic pigment are being developed in the inks and coating industries as an alternative to expensive metallic foil. As a result, the need to be able to measure the lustre or brilliance of a metallic finish in a reliable and consistent way has become essential.
An example in practical terms could be taken by the need of corporate packaging to maintain the graphic consistency of its brand when using metallic finishes to achieve equal lustre throughout a series of point-of -sale packaging despite the use of different application processes and substrates.
It became apparent during a pre-development investigation through producers of metallic pigment, universities and spectrophotometer manufacturers that there was no established method or equipment specifically designed to measure metallic lustre.
In some industries, the use of a gloss meter has been adopted as an appropriate method of measurement. In this method the specular gloss is measured at a specidic angle. This does not represent the scattered reflection of the metallic pigment and therefore a very glossy surface with a low metallic effect would show an unrepresentative result in terms of lustre. In some cases panels of visual assessors are set up to judge metallic effect, but these are of course heavily subjective.
The invention overcomes or at least mitigates the inaccuracies of the above known procedures by providing a method of measurement that will assess numerically the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance in a representative, repeatable and reliable way, and provide the basis for the creation of an index that can be adopted by various markets to specify a level of metallic effect.
Brief summary of the Invention
In one aspect the invention provides a method of measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance which method comprises a) detennining the intensity of light reflected from an area of the surface at various points across the visible spectrum; b) producing from the reflected light measurements a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light included and a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light excluded; c) converting each set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates into its tristimulus values; d) converting the tristimulus values for each set of CIE L*a*b* values into spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values; and, e) converting the spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values into a numerical value that represents the level of lustre for the surface which is a function of the difference between the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded.
In another aspect the invention provides apparatus for measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance which apparatus comprises a) means for determining the intensity of light reflected from an area of the surface at various points across the visible spectrum; b) means for producing from the reflected light measurements a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light included and a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light excluded; c) means for converting each set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates into its tristimulus values; d) means for converting the tristimulus values for each set of CIE L*a*b* values into spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values; and, e) means for converting the spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values mto a numerical value that represents the level of lustre for the surface which is a function of the difference between the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded.
In a further aspect the invention provides a computer programme product directly loadable into the internal memory of a digital computer comprising software code portions for performing steps c), d) and e) of the method of the invention.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a computer programme product stored on a computer usable medium, comprising computer readable programme means for performing steps c), d) and e) of the method of the invention.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a measuring guide suitable for use in the method of the invention.
Figure 2 is a chart showing the results of using the measurement method of the invention as a way of monitoring the lustre of point-of-sale products.
Detailed Description of the Invention
Surfaces that display a metallic appearance are usually metal, finished or polished in a particular way, or metallic flakes processed from metal and dispersed in a medium that enables the resulting composition to be applied to whichever product or substrate is required to attain the desired metallic finish.
In the case of cast or formed metal surfaces, it is the process of polishing or surface treatment that determines the level of reflection. In basic terms, the smoother the surface of the metal the greater the reflectance and increase in the specular content of light reflececd, ultimately resulting in a mirror finish. Conversely, the more uneven the surface of the metal is, the more the reflected light is scattered away from the specular angle resulting in a lower level of lustre or surface reflection.
Broadly, the same principles apply where metal is atomised and processed into flakes that are used in the manufacture of paints, inks and coatings. In basic terms, the dispersed flakes of metal are required to be applied and to lie on the substrate in an even film and form as near as possible, a continuous film of dispersed metallic flakes mimicking a solid metal effect. The film thickness of such a coating, depending on which application process is used, will vary from 3 to 50 microns. Consequently, the size of the metallic flake is crucial to its particular application process and the associated film thickness. The size and shape of the metallic flake is an important factor in the resulting lustre of the coating together with the way that the flake orientates itself within the film. The method of the invention takes these factors into account when producing a numerical measurement of the lustre of the surface.
The first step of the method of the invention is determining the intensity of light reflected from an area of the surface at various points across the visible spectrum, preferably in the range 400nm to 700nm.
Advantageously, the reflected light measurements are made using a sphere spectrophotometer. The spectrophotometer may view the sample diffusely by the use of a barium coated integrated sphere. It is a feature of the sphere spectrophotometer that the light from its light source reflects from the metallic surface at all angles before being passed to the viewing optics. Advantageously, the spectrophotometer comprises a specular exclusion port or gloss trap. This feature allows the spectrophotometer to obtain data from the sample with the specular gloss removed from the measurement and also with the specular gloss included. In this way, the two separate sets of CIE L*a*b* coordinates required by the method of the invention can be produced, namely, one set for which specular content is included and another set for which specular content is excluded.
The spectrophotometer reads an area of the sample through an aperture having a particular size. Some spectrophotometers have a variable aperture size. The size of the aperture used will affect the measurement taken. Therefore, for accurate comparisons to be made between the lustre of different samples, it is important that the same size aperture is used when taking readings.
Preferably, the spectrophotometer obtains raw spectral data from the surface of the sample and delivers calorimetric data in the form of CIE L*a*b* colour space using the CIE Standard Observer, CIE Daylight Illuminant.
For convenience, a portable sphere spectrophotometer may be used. An example of a suitable commercially available instrument is the X-Rite_ Model SP64.
The instrument has d/8 measuring geometry, a viewing aperture of 8mm and illumination of 12mm under a gas filled tungsten light source. The instrument has a spectral range from 400 to 700nm measuring at 10nm intervals.
In measuring metallic surfaces, the surface profile is contributory to the result as is the metallic flake orientation. Irregularities in the surface will affect the reflection of light and to maximise the consistency of reading it is advantageous to measure the surface at di ffercnt angles, preferably set angles, in the same area of the sample. The resulting measurements can be averaged.
It has been found that taking measurements of the area of the surface through 144 at intervals of 36 , i.e. at 0 , 36 , 72 , 108 and 144 provides excellent results.
hi practice, this can be achieved by positioning the spectrophotometer aperture over the area of the surface to be measured, taking the measurements, rotating the spectrophotometer by 36 over the same area, taking further measurements, and repeating these steps until the required five sets of measurements have been taken.
The data from the measurents are averaged and processed within the spectrophotometer.
To maintain consistency while measuring samples, it is preferred to use preset viewing angles. A measuring guide as illustrated in Figure 1 may be used to standardise the method. The measuring guide 10 comprises a sheet of material I 1 e.g. plastics material having a circular aperture 12 large enough to accommodate the spectrophotometer aperture, typically having a diameter of 20mm. The circumference of the aperture 12 is marked at the various angles by lines 13 to enable the spectrophotometer to be orientated in the correct way.
In use, the measuring guide is positioned on the sample to be measured. The spectrophotometer is positioned over the measuring guide so that it can measure the reflectance from the area exposed by the aperture 12 and is aligned with one of the lines 13 on the measuring guide. After measurements have been taken, the spectrophotometer is rotated so that it is aligned with another of the lines 13. Further measurements are taken and the process repeated until five sets of measurements at intervals of 36 have been taken.
When a metallic coated surface is on a transparent or translucent substrate, the surface on which the sample is laid to be measured can affect the lustre measurement.
In this case, it is advantageous for the sample to be laid on a surface that gives enough reflectance and opacity for the spectrophotometer to obtain accurate calorimetric data.
For example, a bright white card having a thickness of 400pm and having CIE L*a*b* coordinates of L*94.50 a*0.70 b* 1.50 is suitable. Employing such means provides consistency of measurement leading to repeatable results.
In the method of the invention, the reflectance measurements recorded by the spcctrophotometer may be converted into the desired lustre readings by any suitable means e.g. by manual computation or by the use of appropriate software.
Each of the two sets of CIE L*a*b* coordinates produced by the spectrophotometer is converted into its tristimulus values. Tristimulus values are mathematically derived from the colour measurements and represent the amounts of red, blue and green light recorded by the eye of a theoretical Standard Observer.
In order to generate the tristimulus valises, both sets of CIE L*a*b* readings obtained from the spectrophotometer may be incorporated into the transformed CIE 1976 CIEfLAB colour space equation referenced in CIE Publication 15.2 (1986) Colorimetry (second edition) Section 4.2.2. the transformed equation is shown below Y=Yo[(L + 16)/116]3 X = X0 [ a*/500 + (YIYO)/3]3 Z = Z0 [-b*/200 + (Y/YO)/3]3 wherein X' = 94.811, Ye = 100.00 and Z0 = 107.304.
The conversion of tristimulus values for each set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates into the respective spectral reflectance data may be achieved by the use of linear models and basis functions as referenced in Computational Colour Science Using MATLAB by Stephen Westland and Caterina Ripamonti, Section 10.5.3.
The computation of the tristimulus values T for a given reflectance spectrum P can be represented by the linear system T=MP whirred M is a 3 x 31 matrix whose rows contain the wavelength-by-wavelength product of the illuminant with one of the three colour-matching functions. By using basis functions representing the smoothness of the reflectance spectra a more accurate prediction of T can be obtained. For example, if a linear model with three basis functions Is used, then the 31 x n matrix of reflectance spectra P can be replaced by BA where B is a 31 x 3 matrix of basis functions and A is a 3 x n matrix of coefficients, producing the equation T = MBA MB is a 3 x 3 matrix and therefore the above equation represents a linear system with three constraints and three unknowns and can easily be solved using the equation A = (MB)-iT Since P = BA, an equation can be written to recover the spectral reflectance data as follows P = B(MB)-iT The spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values is converted into a lustre measurement for the surface which is a function of the difference between the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded.
Preferably, the lustre measurement for the surface is the difference between the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded divided by the number of wavelengths at which the intensity of the reflected light is determined.
More preferably, the spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values Is converted into a lustre measurement for the surface in accordance with the equation (A-B)/3 1 wherein the intensity of the wavelengths of light reflected from an area of the surface is measured at loams intervals in the range from 400nm to 700nm and A is the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and B is the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded.
The apparatus required for measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance comprises a) means for determining the intensity of light reflected from an area of the surface at various points across the visible spectrum; b) means for producing from the reflected light measurements a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light included and a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light excluded; c) means for converting each set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates into its tristimulus values; d) means for converting the tristimulus values for each set of CIE L*a*b* values into spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values; and, e) means for converting the spectral reflectance data for each set of tastimulus values into a numerical value that represents the level of lustre for the surface which is a function of the difference between the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded.
As discussed above, the means for determining the intensity of light reflected from an area of the surface at various points across the visible spectrum is preferably a ] O sphere spectrophotometer.
Preferably, means b) to e) comprise one or more computer systems for performing the required steps.
Typically, commercially available sphere spectrophotometers having a specular exclusion port include means for producing from the reflected light measurements a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light included and a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light excluded by way of an appropriate computer programme comprising software code portions for performing the required steps stored in the computing means in the spectrophotometer.
The remaining means c), d) and e) may also be provided in the fonm of a computer programme comprising software code portions for performing the required steps. Clearly, the computer programme present in the spectrophotometer could include the software code portions representing means b), c), d) and e). Alternatively, a computer programme comprising software code portions for performing the steps c), d) and e) could be run on a separate computer.
A lustre index can be created that operates on a linear scale with 100 as the highest value representing a surface equivalent to a perfect mirror and O as the lowest value representing a surface having no metallic appearance or specular gloss.
The method of the invention is suitable for establishing comparative lustre 3() levels on surfaces with a similar profile. Arbitrary standards can be set although it must be recognised that different metallic materials can have different surface profiles and consequently this can affect the visual perception of lustre.
The use of the CIE L*a*b* coordinates will give an evaluation of colour difference when comparing a range of coloured metallic samples. By combining lustre measurement according to the invention with CIE L*a*b* coordinates, users are able to effectively and accurately evaluate and control coloured metallic surfaces.
The use of a lustre index in the active working situation of monitoring point of-sale products of a major retail chain is shown by Figure 2. This demonstrates the ability of the measurement method of the invention system to record the level of silver lustre on a series of packaged goods achieved by several different print producers using various processes and printing substrates.
The tolerance levels have been set at an upper limit of 11.5 and a lower limit of 7.5. This allows the variability in lustre that can be caused by the substrate and by the printing process to be monitored, and, in cases where the lustre falls out of the tolerance band, advice given to the printer as to how to adjust his process to comply with the set tolerance.
The graph shows the lustre results of random samples purchased from the store at the time of the pre-monitoring situation. The wide differences shown are those that can occur due to a number factors such as: different silver inks, low ink film weight and excess over-varnishing. These were accepted by the retail group as uncontrollable factors prior to the use of a lustre index.
The graph also shows the lustre results of samples produced after the quality control system described above had been applied.
With this particular monitoring programme, a visual assessment comparison of the samples was carried out by experienced personnel to ensure that the lustre numbers complied with the visual perception which in all cases agreed.
Claims (17)
1. A method of measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance which method comprises a) determining the intensity of the various wavelengths of light reflected from an area of the surface; b) producing from the reflected light measurements a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light included and a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinatess for the surface with the specular content of the l 0 reflected light excluded; c) converting each set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates into its tristimulus values; d) converting the tristimulus values for each set of CIE L*a*b* values into spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values; and e) converting the spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values into a lustre measurement for the surface which is a function of the difference between the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the lustre measurement for the surface is the difference between the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded divided by the number of wavelengths at which the intensity of the reflected light is determined.
3. A method according to claim 2 wherein the spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values is converted into a lustre measurement for the surface in accordance with the equation (A-B)/3 1 wherein the intensity of the wavelengths of light reflected from an area of the surface is measured at 10nm intervals in the range from 400nm to 700nm and A is the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and B is the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded. -I 1
4. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the reflected light measurements are made using a sphere spectrophotometer.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the reflected light measurements are taken at di ffercnt angles on the surface and the measurements are averaged.
6. A method according to claim 5 wherein the reflected light measurements are taken at five angles on the surface.
7. A method according to claim 6 wherein the reflected light measurements are taken at 0 , 36 , 72 , 108 and 144 on the surface.
8. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein each set of CIE L*a*b* values is converted into its tristimulus values in accordance with the following transformed equation: Y=Yo[(L + 16)/116]3 X = XO [ a*/500 + (Y/YO)/3]3 Z = ZO [-b*/200 + (Y/YO)/3]3 wherein XO = 94. 811, YO = 100.00 and ZO = 107.304.
9. A method of measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance substantially as hereinbefore described.
10. Apparatus for measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance which apparatus comprises a) means for determining the intensity of the various wavelengths of light reflected from an area of the surface; b) means for producing from the reflected light measurements a set of CIF: L*a*b* coordinates for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light included and a set of CIE L*a*b* coordinatess for the surface with the specular content of the reflected light excluded; c) means for converting each set of CIE L*a*b* coordinates into its tristimulus values; d) means for converting the tristimulus values for each set of CIE L*a*b* values into spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values; and, e) means for converting the spectral reflectance data for each set of tristimulus values into a lustre measurementfor the surface which is a function of the difference between the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is included and the sum of spectral reflectance data for the set wherein specular content is excluded.
11. Apparatus according to claim 10 wherein the means for determining the intensity of the various wavelengths of light reflected from an area of the surface is a sphere spectrophotometer.
12. Apparatus according to claim 10 or claim 11 wherein means b) to e) comprise one or more computer systems.
13. Apparatus for measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance substantially as hereinbefore described.
14. A computer programme product directly loadable into the internal memory of a digital computer comprising software code portions for performing steps c), d) and e) of claim 1.
15. A computer programme product according to claim 14 further comprising software code portions for performing step b).
16. A computer programme product stored on a computer usable medium, comprising computer readable programme means for performing steps c), d) and e) of claim 1.
17. A computer programme product according to clam, 16 further comprising computer readable programmc means for performing step b).
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0417247A GB2416834A (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2004-08-03 | A method of measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance |
PCT/GB2005/002801 WO2006013320A1 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2005-07-18 | A method and apparatus for measuring lustre |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0417247A GB2416834A (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2004-08-03 | A method of measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB0417247D0 GB0417247D0 (en) | 2004-09-01 |
GB2416834A true GB2416834A (en) | 2006-02-08 |
Family
ID=32947890
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB0417247A Withdrawn GB2416834A (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2004-08-03 | A method of measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (1) | GB2416834A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006013320A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR3011078A1 (en) * | 2013-09-26 | 2015-03-27 | Winoa | METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE STRIPPING STATE OF A METAL SURFACE |
DE102023116851A1 (en) * | 2023-06-27 | 2025-01-02 | Uwe Kunk | Aperture for mechanically limiting light falling into an opening of a color measuring device and use thereof |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB0417464D0 (en) | 2004-08-05 | 2004-09-08 | Domnick Hunter Ltd | Filter assembly |
WO2013081834A1 (en) * | 2011-11-28 | 2013-06-06 | U.S. Coatings Ip Co. Llc | Method for determining the surface gloss of a colour standard |
CN110691548B (en) | 2017-07-28 | 2023-05-12 | 谷歌有限责任公司 | System and method for predicting and summarizing medical events from electronic health records |
WO2022051461A1 (en) | 2020-09-04 | 2022-03-10 | Sun Chemical Corporation | Fully integrated digital color management system |
CN118641537B (en) * | 2024-05-20 | 2025-01-28 | 上海联豪食品有限公司 | Nondestructive testing method for steak quality based on optical detection |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3549264A (en) * | 1968-11-13 | 1970-12-22 | Hunter Associates Lab Inc | Instrument for measuring the geometric attributes of metallic appearance by measuring light reflected at various angles from a surface |
US4479718A (en) * | 1982-06-17 | 1984-10-30 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Three direction measurements for characterization of a surface containing metallic particles |
US4711580A (en) * | 1985-01-28 | 1987-12-08 | Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc. | Modeling properties of flake finishes using directional resolution and statistical flake orientation distribution function |
US5018867A (en) * | 1988-04-21 | 1991-05-28 | Rautaruukki Oy | Method and apparatus for the inspection of specularly reflective surfaces |
US6166814A (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 2000-12-26 | Georgia Tech Research Corp. | Method and apparatus for color matching paints |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4093991A (en) * | 1977-01-26 | 1978-06-06 | Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc. | Spectrophotometer-digital data processing system for appearance measurements providing fast and accurate standardization, ease of use for different appearance measurements and fast response |
JP3185031B2 (en) * | 1991-06-17 | 2001-07-09 | 株式会社キーエンス | Gloss detector |
US5369481A (en) * | 1992-05-08 | 1994-11-29 | X-Rite, Incorporated | Portable spectrophotometer |
DE69533802T2 (en) * | 1994-09-14 | 2005-12-15 | X-Rite, Inc., Grandville | ABTASTKOLORIMETER |
JPH11241949A (en) * | 1997-12-26 | 1999-09-07 | Minolta Co Ltd | Apparatus for measuring reflection property |
US6226085B1 (en) * | 1998-06-26 | 2001-05-01 | Gretagmacbeth Llc | Method and apparatus for surface effect characterization |
-
2004
- 2004-08-03 GB GB0417247A patent/GB2416834A/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2005
- 2005-07-18 WO PCT/GB2005/002801 patent/WO2006013320A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3549264A (en) * | 1968-11-13 | 1970-12-22 | Hunter Associates Lab Inc | Instrument for measuring the geometric attributes of metallic appearance by measuring light reflected at various angles from a surface |
US4479718A (en) * | 1982-06-17 | 1984-10-30 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Three direction measurements for characterization of a surface containing metallic particles |
US4711580A (en) * | 1985-01-28 | 1987-12-08 | Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc. | Modeling properties of flake finishes using directional resolution and statistical flake orientation distribution function |
US5018867A (en) * | 1988-04-21 | 1991-05-28 | Rautaruukki Oy | Method and apparatus for the inspection of specularly reflective surfaces |
US6166814A (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 2000-12-26 | Georgia Tech Research Corp. | Method and apparatus for color matching paints |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR3011078A1 (en) * | 2013-09-26 | 2015-03-27 | Winoa | METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE STRIPPING STATE OF A METAL SURFACE |
WO2015044591A1 (en) * | 2013-09-26 | 2015-04-02 | Winoa | Method for determining the etching state of a metal surface |
DE102023116851A1 (en) * | 2023-06-27 | 2025-01-02 | Uwe Kunk | Aperture for mechanically limiting light falling into an opening of a color measuring device and use thereof |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2006013320A1 (en) | 2006-02-09 |
GB0417247D0 (en) | 2004-09-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7145656B2 (en) | Computer-implemented method for matching paint | |
EP2000794B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for determining a spectral bi-directional appearance property of a surface | |
EP1880196B1 (en) | Measuring an appearance property of a surface using a spatially under-sampled bidirectional reflectance distribution function | |
KR100748844B1 (en) | Color matching method by electronic imaging device | |
AU2005284094B2 (en) | Method for matching paint | |
US3690771A (en) | Method and apparatus for instrumentally shading metallic paints | |
KR101725700B1 (en) | Texture analysis of a painted surface using specular angle data | |
EP2228634A1 (en) | Method and system for enhanced formulation and visualization rendering | |
CN105849516B (en) | Use the normalized coating surface texture analysis of pivot | |
US20090157212A1 (en) | System and method of determining paint formula having a effect pigment | |
EP2425404B1 (en) | Display of effect coatings on electronic display devices | |
JP3671088B2 (en) | Method for determining optical properties of metallic coatings | |
GB2416834A (en) | A method of measuring the lustre of a surface having a metallic appearance | |
CN110462687B (en) | Color coating determining device, color coating determining method, color coating determining program, and computer-readable medium containing the same | |
Han et al. | Bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF)-based coarseness prediction of textured metal surface | |
JP2024014906A (en) | Fully integrated digital color management system | |
JP7261725B2 (en) | Color difference measurement method | |
JP2005326389A (en) | Method for determining optical properties of metallic coating | |
JPS6161042A (en) | Method of characterizing optical property of surface containing metallic particle by apparatus | |
Wu et al. | Towards a practical metric of surface gloss for metallic coatings from automotive industry | |
CN103852430A (en) | Method for measuring and characterizing aluminium-sprayed paper POP (Point Of Purchase) ink printing color | |
EP1602903A2 (en) | Method and device for colorimetric measurement of effect- and uni-lacquers | |
JP2004286672A (en) | Evaluation method of sense of metal for metallic coating film | |
Rösler | II Colour measurement, colour measurement systems and visual colour assessment | |
JPH0326943A (en) | Measuring method for crispness of paint coating |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WAP | Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1) |