GB2135886A - Pesticidal pour-on formulations - Google Patents

Abstract

Formulations comprise one or more ectoparasiticides in a glycol or glycerol ester of a C8-10 fatty acid carrier. Fractionated coconut oil is the preferred carrier.

Description

SPECIFICATION Pesticidal pour-on oil formulations The present invention relates to liquid formulations for localised topical application which contain substances having ectoparasiticidal activity and to methods of controlling parasites of animals by administration of such formulations.

Formulations for localised topical application, such as pour-on or spot-on formulations, are now well known in the art and are described, for example, in Australian Patent Application 73640/81 and UK Patent Application 8134831 (Publication No.2088212). These formulations are applied topically to a limited area of the animal's body surface and the ectoparasiticide is believed to migrate over the body surface to control ectoparasites distant from the points of application.

Unfortunately, it has been discovered that a number of solvent systems described in the art provide formulations for localised topical application which cause irritancy or toxicity to the animal on administration. This is particularly the case with substances which are insoluble in a range of solvents, thereby restricting the choice of solvent that can be used to provide a pour-on formulation where the active substance is in solution.

It has now been found that a particular group of neutral oils has the combined properties of low irritancy and appropriate solvency and is particularly suitable for use in formulations for localised topical application.

These neutral oils have the additional advantages of having low melting points and of not enhancing the transdermal penetration of the substance having ectoparasite activity.

Accordingly, the present invention provides a formulation comprising one or more ectoparasiticides in a glycol or glycerol ester of a C80 fatty acid carrier.

Suitably the ectoparasiticide is in a glycol diester or a glycerol triester of a Cs.io fatty acid and preferably in a glycerol triester.

Suitably the carrier is fractionated coconut oil, also referred to as caprylic/capric triglyceride.

The formulations of the present invention are preferably solutions. The present formulations may contain up to 25% w/v of additives conveniently used in pour-on formulations, for example spreading agents, adhesion promoters, surface active agents, stabilisers and colouring agents. Suitably the formulations of the present invention contain up to 10% w/v of such additives and preferably below 8% w/v of such additives.

In one preferred embodiment the formulations of the present invention will include less than 1% w/v of additives. Preferably the formulations will contain no additives, or colouring agents are the only additives included and these will be present at a level of 0.5% or less.

Suitable spreading agents are liquids which distribute themselves particularly readily on the skin.

Dowanol DPM (dipropylene glycol mono methyl ether) is a particularly suitable spreading agent for inclusion within the formulations of the present invention. Isopropyl myristate is another commonly used spreading agent. Australian Patent Application 73640/81 describes the properties of spreading agents (referred to as spreading oils) and lists various classes of these substances.

Adhesion promoters include carboxymethylcellulose, methylcellulose and other cellulose derivatives and starch derivatives, polyacrylates, alginates, gelatin, gum arabic, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol, copolymers of methyl vinyl ether and maleic anhydride, polyethylene glycols, paraffins, oils, waxes and hydrogenated castor oil, colloidal silicic acid or mixtures of the substances mentioned.

The formulations of the present invention do not normally contain surface active agents; however these may be included if desired.

Surface-active agents (comprising emulsifiers and wetting agents) include: 1. anionic surface-active agents, such as Na lauryl sulphate, fatty alcohol ether-sulphates and monoethanolamine salts of mono-/di-alkylpolyglycol ether orthophosphoric acid esters, 2. cationic surface-active agents, such as cetyltrimethylammonium chloride.

3. ampholytic surface-active agents, such as di-Na-N-lauryl- aminodipropionate or lecithin, and 4. non-ionic surface-active agents, for example, polyoxyethylated castor oil, polyoxyethylated sorbitane monooleate, sorbitan monostearate, ethyl alcohol, glycerol monosterate, polyoxyethylene stearate and alkylphenol polyglycol ethers.

Stabilisers for preventing the chemical degradation which occurs in the case of some active compounds include, for example, antioxidants, such as tocopherols, butylhydroxyanisole and butylhydroxytoluene and scavengers such as epichlorhydrin. Colouring agents include conventional dyes which are soluble in the carrier of the present invention, such as Sudan Red or Oil Golden Yellow.

The ectoparasiticide incorporated within a formulation of the present invention may be active against one or more ectoparasite species including insects and acarines, including lice, ticks, keds, mites, fleas, flies and itchmite.

Water insoluble ectoparasiticides agents are particularly suitable for inclusion in the present invention and include pyrethrins, pyrethroids, water-insoluble organo-phosphorus compounds, formamidines, avermectins (or milbemycins) and mixtures thereof. Suitable milbemycins are disclosed in Australian published patent applications numbers 42309/78 and 42389/78. Where there are isomers of ectoparasiticides, both the ectoparasitically active isomers themselves and mixtures thereof with non-ectoparasitically active isomers are suitable for inclusion within the formulations of the present invention.

Preferred pyrethroids have the formula

wherein M is

and wherein X1 to X4 are independently selected from halo C1-C4 alkyl, halogen-substituted C1-C4 alkyl, and halogen-substituted phenyl; X5 is -H or halo; R1 is -H or cyano; and R2 is halogen-substituted phenyl.

Particularly preferred compounds are presented in Tables I to Ill.

TABLE I

No. X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 R1 trivial name 1 Cl Cl - - H H permethrin 2 CH3 CH3 - - H H phenothrin 3 Br Br - - H CN deltamethrin 4 Cl Cl - - H CN cypermethrin 5 Cl CF3 - - H CN cyhalothrin 6 Cl - - F CN flumethrin 7 Cl Cl - - F CN cyfluthrin 8 CH3 CH3 - - H CN cyphenothrin TABLE II

No.X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 R1 trivial name 9 Br Br Br Br H CN tralomethrin 10 Cl Cl Br Br H CN tralocythrin TABLE Ill

M = - CO - CH - R2 CEi CU3 C? No. R2 X5 R1 trivial name 11 { Cl H CN fenvalerate Deltamethrin, cypermethrin and Fastac are particularly suitable pyrethroids for inclusion within the formulations of the invention. Fastac is a 1:1 mixture of the IR - cis S and IS - is R isomers of a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-2,2-dimethyl-3-(2,2-dichlorn vinyl)-cyclopropanecarboxylate. Deltamethrin is a particularly preferred pyrethroid.Deltamethrin's approved chemical name is (-)-a-cyano-3-phenoxybenyl- (+ )-cis-2, 2- dimethyl-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl) cyclopropane-1 -carboxylate.

Preferred water-insoluble organophosphorus compounds include the following: O-(4-bromo-2,5-dichlorophenyl)O,O-diethy phosphorothioate (bromophos-ethyl) 2-chloro-1-(2,4dichlorophenyl)vinyl diethyl phosphate (chlorfenvinphos) O,O-diethyl 0-(3,5,6-trichloro-2 pyridyl)phosphorothioate (chlorpyrifos) O,O-diethyl-O-(3-chloro-4-methyl-7-cou marinyl )phosphorothioate (coumaphos); O,0-diethyl-O-(2-isopropyl-6-methyl-pyrimidin-4-yl)phosphorothioate (diazinon); 0-2,4dichlorophenyl O,O-diethylphosphorothioate (dichlofenthion) 2,3-p-dioxanedithiol S[S-bis, O[O-diethyl phosphorodithioate (dioxathion);O-ethyl-O-(quinol-8-yl)phenylphosphorothioate (oxinothiophos); 0,0,0,0,tetraethyl S, S'-methylene di(phosphorodithioate)(ethion) 0,0-dimethyl-0-2,4,5-trichlorophenyl phosphorothioate (fenchlorphos); O,O-dimethyl-0-(4-dimethylsulfa moyl phenyl)phosphorothioate (famphur); 0,0dimethyl-O-(4-nitro-m-tolyl)phosphorothioate (fenitrothion);O,O-diethyl a-cyanobenzylideneamino- oxyphosphonothioate (phoxim); and (E)-O-2-iospropoxycarbonyl-1 -methylvinyl O-methyl ethylphosphoramidothioate (propetamphos) Preferred formamidines include water-insoluble compounds of the formula

wherein R is hydrogen or C16 alkyl, and each Xis independently selected from hydrogen, C16 alkyl and halo.

Particularly preferred formamidines include N,N.di-(2,4-xylyliminomethyl)-methylamine (called amitraz).

When a pyrethroid is included in a formulation of the present invention it will suitably be present at a concentration of 10% w/v or less. Deltamethrin will suitably be present at a concentration from 0.1 to 2.5%, preferably 0.5 to 2% and conveniently 1%.

Other active substances, as hereinbefore defined, will suitably be present at a concentration of less than 33%, suitably less than 15%, for example between 1 and 7.5%. Normally, there will be a maximum of three active substances in the formulation and preferably only one. Preferred mixtures of active substances include a pyrethroid with a second pyrethroid, with a water insoluble organophosphorus compound or with a formamidine.

The invention in a second aspect provides a method of controlling external parasites which comprises making a localised external application of a formulation as hereinbefore defined to an animal. External parasites include those of the Classes Arachnida (especially acarines) and Insecta (especially Phthiraptera and Diptera).External parasites of particular commercial significance include: Sheep Melophagus ovinus - ked Damalinia ovis - biting louse Linognathus ovillus - sucking louse L.pedalis - sucking louse Goats Damalinia caprae - biting louse D.limbata - biting louse D.crassipes - biting louse Linognathus stenopsis - sucking louse Cattle a) Lice Damalinia bovis - biting louse Linognathus vituli - sucking louse Haematopinus eurysternus - sucking louse Solenopotes capillatus - sucking louse b) Flies Musca domestica M.autumnalis Stomoxys calcitrans Lyperosia irritans Haematobia thirouxipotans H. exigua Simulium spp.

c) Ticks Boophilus microplus B.decoloratus Rhipicephalus app en diculatus R.evertsi Amblyomma hebraeum A.variegatum Hyalomma rufipes H.truncatum Haemaphysalis longicornis Pigs Sarcoptes scabiei var suis - mange Haematopinus suis - sucking louse Dog Linognathussetosus - sucking louse Trichodectes canis - biting louse Ctenocephalides canis - flea Rhipicephalus sanguineus - tick Haemaphysalis leachii - tick The animal is preferably a mammal, and may be selected from cattle, goats, pigs, horses, deer, sheep and domestic pets such as cats and dogs. The animal may also be a bird, e.g. selected from ducks, chickens and geese. Suitably the animal is selected from cattle, sheep and pigs.Preferably the formulations of the present invention will be used to treat lice and keds on sheep and goats and lice, flies and ticks on cattle.

The pour-on formulation may be applied to the animal by any conventional method for the localised application of formulations, for example by wiping an impregnated material over a small area of the animal's body or by the use of commercially available applicators, such as the Clout Backliner Applicator (Registered Trademark) or a pump dispenser or by the apparatus described in Australian Patent No 494198. Generally, the pour-on formulation is applied by pouring in one or several lines or in a spot on the back or shoulder of the animal. Alternatively, it may be applied by means of a localised spray.

It is a particular advantage of the use of pour-on formulations that only small volumes of the formulation need to be applied. Depending on the size of the animal, the volume applied will generally lie in the range 2-30 ml, and suitably 5-10ml for larger mammals. The amount of active substance, as hereinbefore defined, administered to an animal will depend on the size of the animal, the amount can be between 10 mg and 10 g but will normally be between 1 Omg and 1 g. Preferably 50 to 100mg of active substance will be applied to a sheep and 100 to 200mg of active substance will be applied to a cow.

The formulations of the present invention will be prepared by standard techniques, i.e. in the case where the formulation is a solution by bringing the ectoparasiticide into contact with the carrier and then gently heating and stirring until dissolved if necessary. If the ectoparasiticide is insoluble in or immiscible with the carrier or is water-soluble, then a suspension or emulsion may be prepared by standard techniques. To prepare a suspension the ectoparasiticide may be ground in the solvent to the required particle size and the remaining excipients added with stirring until the final product is of uniform consistency; generally heating is not necessary. To prepare an emulsion, the ectoparasiticide is dissolved in the carrier or water (whichever is appropriate) together with a suitable emulsifier and the whole homogenised by conventional means.

Emulsions and suspensions are not preferred formulations of the present invention.

Preferred formulations will now be described by way of example only as follows: General procedure for preparing formulations General preparation In the case of a solid the active ingredient (for example deltamethrin) is added to the solvent with stirring.

Gentle heat is applied, where necessary, and stirring is continued until all the solid has dissolved and a homogenous mixture obtained. Auxiliaries to be included in the formulation may be either mixed with the active ingredient before addition of the solvent or added to the homogenous mixture of active ingredient and solvent.

Combinations of active ingredients will be prepared in the same manner as formulations of single active ingredients.

In the case where the active ingredient(s) is a liquid (e.g. supona), then the preparation is prepared by mixing the two (or more) liquids together until the product is homogeneous. Heat will not generally be necessary.

Example 1 Solutions of deltamethrin in fractionated coconut oil (Miglyol 812 from Dynamit Nobel Chemicals) were prepared by the standard technique described before.

a) Deltamethrin 1g Miglyol 812 to 100 ml b) Deltamethrin 1 ml Dowanol DPM lOg Miglyol 812 to 100 ml c) Deltamethrin lg Butylated Hydroxyanisole 0.5g Dowanol DPM 109 Miglyol 812 to 100 ml Sudan Red 0.02g was included in each formulation.

Miglyol is a Registered Trade Mark.

Example 2 Solutions ofamitraz in fractionated coconut oil were prepared as described before a) Amitraz 5g Miglyol 812 to 100 ml b) Amitraz 5g Dowanol DPM 20 g Epichlorhydrin 0.59 Miglyol 812 to 100 ml Sudan Red 0.029 was included in each formulation.

Example 3 Solutions of other ectoparasiticides were prepared in Miglyol 812 in a similar manner.

1) PERMETHRIN 59 MIGLYOL 812 To 100 ml 2) CYPERMETHRIN 2.59 MIGLYOL 812 To 100 ml 3) ETHION 10g MIGLYOL 812 To 100 ml 4) DELNAV 109 MIGLYOL 812 To 100 ml 5) PROLATE 59 MIGLYOL 812 To 100 ml 6) DIELDRIN 19 MIGLYOL 812 To 100 ml 7) DIAZINON 79 MIGLYOL 812 To 100 ml 8) SUPONA 79 MIGLYOL 812 To 100 ml 9) PERMETHRIN 59 ETHION 10g MIGLYOL To 100 ml 10) DELTAMETHRIN 19 ETHION 59 MIGLYOL To 100 ml Example 4 Solutions of ectoparasiticides were prepared in Miglyol 840 in a similar manner 1) DELTAMETHRIN 19 MIGLYOL 840 To 100 ml 2) DELTAMETHRIN 19 BUTYLATED HYDROXYANISOLE 0.59 MIGLYOL 840 To 100 ml 3) AM ITRAZ 59 STABAXOL 1 19 MIGLYOL 840 To 100 ml A field trial to determine the efficacy of 1% deltamethrin in miglyol 812, applied as a 'spot-on= for the treatment of a lice infestation on pigs Introduction The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of 1% deltamethrin in Miglyol 812 for the treatment of a lice infestation on pigs.

Animals Two hundred and sixty 'Fastback Hybrid' pigs comprising 37 gilts, 9 boars and 214 sows.

Materials Deltamethrin 10.7 g/kg Miglyol 812 989.3 g/kg 1000.0 Method Of the 260 gilts, sows and boars on the farm a total of 239 were examined to determine whether they were infested with the pig louse, Haematopinus suis. Records worn, kept of the ear tag number of the pigs and of the level of infestation. This was classified subjectively as: + Light ++ Moderate +++ Heavy All of the 260 gilts, sows and boars were treated with 5ml deltamethrin 1% in Miglyol 812. This was applied topically to the midline of the shoulders using a Clout Backliner (Wellcome Australia). (Clout is a registered trade mark) Examination and treatment were performed on April 12 1983. Included in the pigs examined and treated were 44 sows housed in farrowing accommodation.Most of these were suckling piglets and the remainder were due to farrow within a few days after treatment. The sucking piglets were examined for lice infestation but were not treated.

The treated pigs were examined immediately after application of the deltamethrin for any signs of clinical toxicity. The farmer was asked to report any adverse effects.

All 260 gilts, sows and boars were re-examined on April 22nd 1983 and May 24th 1983.

Results Details of the animals examined and treated, and the level of lice infestation, are appended as Table 1.

Of the 239 pigs examined on April 12th 1983, 235 were-lightly to moderately infested with Haematopinus suis. No lice were found on four gilts.

No signs of clinical toxicity were observed after treatment and at the subsequent examination on April 22nd the farmer reported no adverse effects. He noted that within 24 hours of treatment lice were visible at the ends of hairs. He also remarked that it was apparent 24 hours after treatment where the formulation had spread, but by 48 hours there was no indication of where the formulation had been applied.

At this examination, 10 days after treatment, no live lice were observed on any of the 260 pigs examined.

No live lice were found on the sucking piglets.

Similarly, no live lice were found on the treated pigs nor on the untreated piglets at the examination on May 24th, 42 days after treatment.

Discussion In this trial 5 ml of deltamethrin 1% in Miglyol 812 proved very successful in controlling a light to moderate infestation of Haematopinus suis infestation on pigs. No live lice were found at examinations 10 days and 42 days after treatment. Under normal circumstances, on untreated animals, a 42 day period should have been sufficient for viable eggs to hatch and for ovigerous females to be apparent.

After treatment of suckling sows no live lice were found on their untreated piglets which implies that the piglets were protected from lice infestation by treatment of their dams.

No evidence was seen of skin irritation immediately after treatment nor of subsequent skin damage. TABLE 4 Results of pre-treatment examination on April 12th 1983 Middle House Pen Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 436 3 pigs 3 pigs 632 3 pigs 3 pigs 637 640 549 540 Sow 401 NE NE 618 NE NE 656 638 600 (boar) Number 529 440 633 643 346 infestation ++ NE NE ++ NE Ne ++ ++ ++ ++ Far House Pen Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 pigs 3 pigs 3 pigs 506 481 617 505 474 602 652 Sow NE NE NE 588 454 456 587 400 603 (boar) Number 530 550 595 511 429 549 infestation NE NE NE ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Near House (Gilts) Pen Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 gilts 4 gilts 4 gilts 4 gilts Boar 4 gilts 4 gilts 4 gilts 657 648 Sow 660 646 Number 663 655 670 673 674 inferstation + + + + + + - + + + Table 4 (cont)

Pen No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sow 488 608 412 623 574 Empty 332 506 Number 616 614 515 405 573 541 (boar) 418 641 636 642 650 infestation + + + + + + + Pen No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 368 590 547 622 528 386 664 654 Number 414 324 559 586 634 593 (boar) 458 89 518 363 635 565 infestation ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Pen No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sow 499 318 542 349 626 671 546 414 Number 570 592 348 553 627 507 571 (boar) 453 441 373 624 628 649 infestation + ++ + ++ ++ ++ ++ + Pen No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sow 374 477 563 426 330 514 443 123 Number 484 271 499 452 577 473 665 (boar) 579 639 489 620 464 598 630 infestation + + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Table 4 (cont)

Pen No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sow 585 416 645 382 439 647 557 252 Number 587 625 414 581 334 402 672 (boar) 502 619 291 493 522 ? 582 infestation + + + ++ + ++ ++ + Pen No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sow 647 547 97 532 435 298 Empty 682 Number 527 408 520 536 606 576 (boar) 534 538 292 539 609 479 infestation ++ + + ++ ++ ++ ++ Farrowing House Sow numbers 406 535 457) 653 425 470) 556 439 433) 380 494 402) 444 317 533) 377 519) 544 320 562) All + + infestation 568 543 285) 651 652 654) 363 578 460) 601 445 487) 479 458 439) 460 436 407) 555 605 599) 510 561 506) + = Slight infestation ++ Moderate infestation NE = Notexamined - = No live lice found Example 6 A field trial to assess the efficacy ofa formulation containing 1.00/0 deltamethrin against cattle lice Introduction Housed cattle with infestations of lice during the winter time often require treatment. The objective of this trial was to assess the efficacy of a 1.0% deltamethrin formulation when applied to lice infested cattle.

Materials Formulation containing 1.0% deltamethrin based on Miglyol 812 as solvent.

Lice infested cattle in the West of Scotland. Details of farms A, B and C and the cattle are given in Table 5 Method The cattle at each farm were examined for the presence of lice. The lice were identified and the severity of the infestation was assessed and classified on a subjective basis as light, moderate or heavy. Each animal selected for treatment was identified by its ear tag number on farms A and B. On farm C, 7 out of 37 in the group were identified. All animals within a group were treated. After treatment there was no contact between treated and un-treated animals on the farm.

All the animals within a group were each treated with 10 ml of 1.0% deltamethrin formulation applied topically to the mid-point of the shoulders, using a Wellcome 20 mL Automatic Drencher.

Treated animals were examined for any signs of dermal irritation at the time of application and again 24 hours later.

The identified animals were re-examined thoroughly 21 days and 42 days after treatment for the presence of lice.

Results The reslts are presented in Table 6.

Discussion Out of 66 animals treated, 36 were examined of which 17 were infested with Damalinia bovis, 9 with Linognathus vituli, 14 with Haematopinus eurysternus and one with Solenopotes capillatus; some animals were infested with more than one species. On examination 3 weeks after treatment no live D. bovis, H eurysternus or S. capillatus were detected; L. vitullwere absent from the animals except for a few lice present in the hollow of the hock joints of 3 animals and two L. vitullwere present on the rump of one animal which had not been infested at the time of treatment.

On examination 6 weeks after treatment no live D. be v/s, H. eurysternus or S. capillatus were detected; a few L. vituliwere present in the hollow of the hock joints of two animals and one L. vituliwas present on the rump of another, but otherwise L. vituliwere not detected. Absence of live lice on examination at 6 weeks after treatment indicates that the infestation has been eradicated, as this allows sufficient time for any lice surviving the treatment to have reproduced and completed their life cycle.

Conclusion Application of one treatment of 10 ml of the 1.0% deltamethrin formulation to lice infested cattle will give complete control of Damalinia be v/s, Haematopinus eurysternus, Solenopotes capillatus, and virtually complete control of Linognathus vituli.

TABLE 5 Details of trial sites Farm A Animals 9 Ayrshire X Friesian. 6-12 months old.

Housing Tied in stalls.

Farm B Animals 20 Hereford X Friesian. 6-12 months old.

Housing Tied in stalls.

Farm C Animals 37 (7 identified) Friesian. 2-3 months old.

Housing Loose in pens.

TABLE 6 Results of examination for lice Treated: 18. 1.83 Farm A.

Animal Pre-treatment Post-treatment No. 18.1.83 8.2.83 1.3.83 D L H S D L H S D L H S 262 ++ - - - - + - - + - - 286 ++ - - - - - - - - - - 288 + - - - - - - - - - - BW + - - - - - - - - - - 211 ++ ++ - - - - - - - - - 271 + - - - - - - - - - - BW + - - - - - - - - - - - 230 + - - - - - - - - - - 266 ++ - - - - - - - - - - D = Damalinia bovis L = Linognathus vituli H = Haematopinus eurysternus S = Solenopotes capillatus + =2liveL.V.onrump +2 = 1 live L.V. on rump - = No live lice found + = Light infestation ++ = Moderate infestation =Heavyinfestation Table 6 (cont) Results of examinatior) for lice Treated: 18. 1.83 Farm B.

Animal Pre-treatment Post-treatment No. 18.1.83 8.2.83 1.3.83 D L H S D L H S D L H S R174 - - ++ - - - - - - - - F927 - - +++ - - - - - - - - 939 - - ++ - - - - - - - - - 1330 - - + + - - - - - - - P597 ++ - - - - - - - - - - HX1 + - - - - - - - - - - HX2 ++ - - - - - - - - - - 656 + - - - - - - - - - - - HX3 + - - - - - - - - - - - HX4 - - +++ - - - - - - - - - HX5 - - +++ - - - - - - - - HX6 - + - - - - - - - - - A1160 - - + - - - - - - - - B47 - - + - - - - - - - - - W967 - - +++ - - - - - - - - 303 - - ++ - - - - - - - - HX7 - - +++ - - - - - - - - - B60 - - + - - - - - - - - - A373 - - ++ - - - - - - - - HX8 - - + - - - - - - - - - D = Damalinia bovis L = Linognathus vituli H = Haematopinus eurysternus S = Solenopotes capillatus - = No live lice found + = Light infestation ++ = Moderate infestation =Heavyinfestation Table 6 (cont) Results of examination for lice Treated: 18. 1.83 Farm C.

Animal Pre-treatment Post-treatment No. 18.1.83 8.2.83 1.3.83 D L H S D L H S D L H S 50 - + - - - * - - - - - 53 - + - - - * - - - * - 45 - ++ - - - * - - - - - 28 - +++ - f - - - - - * - 32 +++ ++ - - - - - - - - - 43 +++ + - - - - - - - - - - 33 +++ + - - - - - - - - - - L.vituli were present in hollow of hock joints of all animals at the time of treatment.

D = Damalinia bovis L = Linognathusvituli H = Haematopinus eurysternus S = Solenopotes capillatus - = No live lice found + = Light infestation ++ = Moderate infestation +++ = Heavy infestation * = A few LA. in hollow of hock joint.

Example 7 No discomfort seen in sheep after the application of deltamethrin spot-on formulations Materials A formulation containing 2% w/v deltamethrin was evaluated. Details are given in Table 7.

5 groups of 4 animals each, details of which are given in Table 8.

Method 5 ml of 15 ml of each formulation was applied by polythene disposable syringes, spotted (5 ml) or poured (15 ml), along the midline of the back from the shoulders in each animal.

Each animal was observed independently by veterinary surgeons at intervals upto 48 hours after treatment for the following signs of discomfort: head shaking/movements muscle fasciculation dermal irritancy/rubbing foot stamping The severity of each sign was scored as follows: 0 = no reaction/abnormal behaviour detected 1 = slight reaction 2 = moderate reaction 3 = marked reaction 4 = very marked reaction The observers were unaware which formulation had been applied to each group.

At each observation the total score for each sign of discomfort was calculated as a percentage of the maximum possible. The percentages for each sign were added to give the total score for the group at each observation.

For example: Animal Head Muscle Dermal Foot Number Shaking fasciculation irritancy stamping A 1 1 1 0 B 2 1 1 1 C 1 1 1 0 Total 4 3 3 1 % Maximum 33 25 25 8 (12) Total score = 91 Results The average scores for each group are recorded in Table 9.

Discussion No signs of irritancy caused by spot-on application were seen in any animal. It appears sheep are not irritated by deltamethrin applied to the skin in doses three times the recommended application rate. It is concluded, within the limitations of this small study, that use of either formulation in sheep should cause no irritancy problems in the field.

TABLE 7 Details of formulations Group 1 Formulation 1 %w/w Miglyol 812 100.00 Exstock.

100.00 Groups 2 and 3 Formulation 2 %w/w 4 and 5 2% Deltamethrin 2.13 Miglyol 812 97.87 100.00 TABLE 8 Details of animal groups Group Number of Wt.Range Age Breed Wool No. animals (kg) (months) coat 1 4 86-99 12 Cheviot shorn 2 & 4 77-84 12 Cheviot long 3 & 4 90-97 12 Cheviot shorn TABLE 9 Total scores for observations of groups following treatment Group Formulation Observation Times (Hours) No. ml 0 1 3 6 24 36 1 x RTDof2% 1 Formulation 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Formulation 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Formulation 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 x RTDof2% 4 Formulation 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Formulation 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 The score given is the average of assessments made by 4 observers.

Example 8 Effect of formulation on the efficacy of deltamethrin spot-on formulations against sheep keds and lice.

Introduction The objective of this trial was to assess the biological efficacy of two different deltamethrin spot-on formulations.

Materials and methods i) Spot-ons Two spot-on formulations, were used: i) a 2% w/v aqueous suspension of deltamethrin ii) a 1% w/v solution deltamethrin in Miglyol 812 ii) Sheep Two test groups, each comprising 5 Welsh Mountain lambs, aged approximately 10 months, were used.

The lambs were in full fleece (15 cm) and were infested with Melophagus ovinus, Damalinia ovis and Linognathus ovlllus.

iii) Method of application 5 ml of each formulation was applied to the skin of each sheep on either 18th or 25th February, 1983. The fleece was parted at the point of the shoulders or on the rump (mid-line in the sacro-lumbar region) before application.

Details of the treatments are given below Group Spot-on Application Treated Site 1 2% aqueous suspension of detamethrin Shoulders 25.2.83 2 1% solution of deltamethrin in Miglyol 812 Shoulders 18.2.83 On both days the weather was dry and cool (5.5 or 7.8"C, respectively).

iv) Assessment of parasite burdens The parasite burden of the test groups were assessed before and after treatment by standard techniques.

The test groups were isolated for the period of the trial (11 weeks). No re-infestation techniques were employed.

ResultslDiscussion Keds Full detail of the ked counts were given in Table 10. They are summarised in Table 11.

The Miglyol 812 formulation virtually eradicated all keds by week 7. The aqueous suspension formulation was longer taking effect.

TABLE 10 Total number of keds found at each examination Group Material used Keds Pre- Weeks treat count 1 3 5 7 9 11 Alive 427 166 52 59 16 2 0 2% w/v aqueous Fed Affected 0 14 1 3 0 0 0 suspension of Dead 0 116 36 56 10 9 5 1 Deltamethrin Alive 0 5 5 2 1 0 0 (Point of Unfed Affected 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 shoulders) Dead 0 5 0 8 5 4 1 Total 427 307 94 128 32 15 6 Alive 286 70 12 5 0 1 0 1%w/vsolution Fed Affected 0 17 1 0 0 0 0 of Deltamethrin Dead 0 10 50 20 15 11 1 2 in Miglyol 812 Alive 0 8 3 1 0 1 0 (Point of Unfed Affected 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 shoulders) Dead 0 6 11 15 10 3 1 Total 286 113 80 41 25 16 2 TABLE 11 % survival of original infestation - weeks after treatment (Figures in brackets represent group mean % survival of adult keds) Group Material used 5misapplied 1 3 5 7 9 11 on: : 1 2% w/v Deltamethrin Point of 38.9 12.2 13.8 3.8 0.5 0 (Suspension conc.) shoulders (58.4) (55.2) (52.3) (43.3) (13.3) (0) 553/80/40 2 1%w/vDeltamethrin Point of 24.5 4.2 1.8 0 0.3* 0 (Miglyol 812) shoulders (34.4) (14.3) (9.4) (0) (20.0) (0) 553/80/7H * One live ked only Lice The results obtained against both species of lice are given in Table 12.

TABLE 12 Louse control. No. of sheep bearing live lice - weeks Group Material used 5 ml applied Species 1 3 5 7 9 11 on: 1 2% aqueous suspension Point of D.ovis 5 5 5 2 3 0 of Deltamethrin shoulders L.ovillus 5 3 3 2 3 2 5 1%w/vsolution Point of D.ovis 5 1 0 0 0 0 Deltamethrin in shoulders L.ovillus 4 2 3 2 1 0 Miglyol 812 The 1% w/v solution of deltamethrin in Miglyol 812 eradicated the D.ovis population by 5 weeks after application. The 2% w/v aqueous suspension of deltamethrin took the full 11 -week trial period to clear thins species.

The 1% w/v solution deltamethrin in Miglyol 812 was the only material to eradicate the less-important species, L.ovillus.

Claims (18)

1. A formulation comprising one or more ectoparasiticides in a glycol or glycerol ester of a Cs-io fatty acid carrier.

2. A formulation according to claim 1 wherein the carrier is a glycol diester or a glycerol triester of a C80 fatty acid.

3. A formulation according to claim 2 wherein the carrier is fractionated coconut oil.

4. A formulation according to any of claims 1 to 3 wherein the ectoparasiticide is in solution.

5. A formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 4which contains up to 10% w/v of additives conveniently used in pour-on formulations.

6. A formulation according to claim 5 which contains a spreading agent.

7. A formulation according to claim 5 which contains less than 1% of additives.

8. A formulation according to claim 7 which contains one or more stabilisers and/or colouring agents.

9. A formulation according to claim 1 wherein the ectoparasiticide is selected from the pyrethrins, pyrethroids, water-insoluble organo-phosphorus compounds, formamidines, avermectins and mixtures thereof.

10. A formulation according to claim 9 wherein the ectoparasiticide is a pyrethroid of the formula (I):

11. A formulation according to claim 10 wherein the pyrethroid is selected from permethrin, phenothrin, deltamethrin, cypermethrin, cyhalothrin, flumethrin, cyfluthrin, cyphenothrin, tralomethrin, tralocythrin, fenvalerate or Fastac.

12. A formulation according to claim 11 wherein the pyrethroid is deltamethrin.

13. A formulation according to claim 9 wherein the ectoparasiticide is a water insoluble organophosphorous compound selected from bromophos-ethyl, chlorfenvinphos, chlorpyrifos, coumaphos, diazinon, dichlofenthion, dioxathion, oxinothiophos, ethion, fenchlorphos, famphur, fenitrothion, phoxim and propetamphos.

14. A formulation according to claim 9 wherein the ectoparasiticide in amitraz.

15. A method of controlling external parasites which comprises making a localised external application of a formulation as defined in claim 1 herein to an animal.

16. A method according to claim 15 wherein the animal is selected from cattle, goats, pigs, horses, deer, sheep, cats and dogs.

17. A method according to either claim 15 or 16 wherein the formulation is used to control lice and keds on sheep or goats, or lice, flies or ticks on cattle.

18. A method of preparing a formulation as defined in claim 1 by standard techniques.