EP3934869A1 - A process of wood mineralization using acetoacetate solutions to improve the essential properties of wood - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention relates to a process of wood mineralization using carbonates and / or hydroxides to improve the essential properties of wood, i.e. fire properties, fungal resistance and mechanical properties. The wood mineralization method is a two stage process; namely in the first stage the wood is impregnated with an impregnating solution, such that it penetrates deep into the structure of the wood. The solution may contain at least one metal acetoacetate or a mixture of metal acetoacetates in any weight ratio in a solvent up to 30 wt%. Following the first stage, the impregnated wood is subject to a after-treatment phase, in which the metal acetoacetate(s) is converted into carbonate(s) and / or hydroxide(s) by regulating the temperature and humidity, and the time the impregnated wood is exposed to these conditions. The advantages of the mineralization process proposed over and above the processes used to date are that (1) carbonate(s) and / or hydroxide(s) are formed only when the impregnating solution penetrates deep into the wood's structure, (2) the process is more environmentally friendly, and (3) it is simpler.

Description

A process of wood mineralization using acetoacetate solutions to improve essential properties of wood

Field of the invention

The invention presented relates to the field of wood modification, specifically to the mineralization of wood i.e. the incorporation of CaCO₃ , MgCO₃ , SrCO₃ or other carbonates, and Al(OH)₃ or other hydroxides, into the structure of the wood, and methods for such mineralization.

Background of the invention

The combustibility and flammability of wood is a threatening problem which represents a major challenge in the use of wood and wood products in load-bearing structures, as non- load-bearing cladding material, in furniture, and for other uses. Several approaches have been proposed to reduce the flammability of wood i.e. to improve its reaction to fire. These include the addition of flame-retardants (FRs), chemical modification using conventional FRs, the development of wood-inorganic composites, and the application of FR coatings. Compounds used as FR may be nitrogen, phosphorus, boric acid and borax compounds, inorganic salts such as borates, stannates and silicates, and aluminum and magnesium based minerals. The main disadvantage of using some of these compounds is that they release toxic and carcinogenic compounds (i.e. halogenated FRs) when they bum, or they produce smoke and carbon monoxide (i.e. phosphoms-based inhibitors). Their use is therefore strictly controlled, regulated by law, and increasingly restricted. In contrast, mineral fillers, such as calcium carbonate(CaCO₃), are not controversial in terms of their environmental impact and are therefore considered "green" flame retardants.

Some processes for incorporating CaCO₃ into the structure of wood (i.e. wood mineralization) in order to reduce its flammability, increase hydrophobicity, and improve mechanical properties, are already known. One such wood mineralization process is the in- situ formation of CaCO₃ , achieved by immersing the wood in an aqueous CaCl₂ solution for 1 hour, then in an aqueous NaOH solution for 1 hour, and finally in supercritical CO₂ in a high pressure vessel for 1 hour. The result of the process is reduced flammability of the wood (C. Tsioptsias, C. Panayiotou, Thermal stability and hydrophobicity enhancement of wood through impregnation with aqueous solutions and supercritical carbon dioxide: Journal of Materials Science, 2011, vol. 46 (16), pp. 5406-5411 ). Another procedure involves the double diffusion method. In this method, the wood is immersed in a solution of Na₂CO₃ for 24 hours and then for a further 24 hours in a solution of CaCl₂ with added methanol and dodecanoic acid. Finally, the wood is washed with distilled water and ethanol. Mineralized wood prepared using this method is hydrophobic and leads to improved mechanical properties (C. Wang, C. Liu, J Li, Preparation of Hydrophobic CaC0₃ - Wood Composite In Situ: Advanced Materials Research, 113-116, 2010, pp. 1712-1715). A common challenge in the methods described above is incorporating the CaCO₃ deep into the structure of the wood, as CaCO₃ is negligibly soluble in water. Incorporating CaCO₃ deep into the cellular structure of wood is possible through in-situ alkaline hydrolysis of dimethyl carbonate, which serves as a source of "liquid" CO₂ (V. Merk, M. Chanana, T. Keplinger, S, Gaan, I. Burgert, Hybrid wood materials with improved fire retardance by bio-inspired mineralization at the nano- and submicron level, Green Chemistry, 17 (3) 2015, pp. 1423- 1428 in I. Burger, M. Chanana, V.Merk, USPat. 0043497 Al, 2017). Following this process, mineralized wood shows a relatively high increase in mass (up to 20%), improved durability and mechanical properties (e.g. hardness), and increased resistance to fire, with a reduced water uptake. A review of the literature shows that the most efficient wood mineralization process with an improved resistance to fire was performed by Merk et al. (V. Merk, M. Chanana, S. Gaan, I. Burgert, Mineralization of wood by calcium carbonate insertion for improved flame retardancy, Holzforschung, 70 (9) 2016, pp. 867-876) through the in-situ formation of CaCO₃ , predominantly within the wood lumina and to a lesser extent in the adjacent cell walls. In this case mineralization was achieved by vacuum impregnation of wood, using an aqueous solution of NaHCO₃ and alcoholic CaCl₂. The impregnation process can take varying lengths of time (a shorter reaction cycle lasts 2 hours, a longer one 24 hours), and consists of one or more (of up to 4) cycles. As the cycle length, or the number of reaction cycles increases, so does the mass of CaCO₃ introduced and consequently the total mass of the wood increases. Using 24-hour cycles, for example, the mass of a piece of spruce was shown to increase by 20% after one cycle and by approximately 35% following 3 cycles (I. Burger, M. Chanana, V. Merk, U.S. Pat. 0043497 Al, 2017).

The main disadvantage of the above-mentioned methods of wood mineralization is the formation of by-products (i.e. NaCl), which can affect the appearance of wood and can also corrode metal elements (e.g. binders), which are often embedded in wood and wooden products. In the case of the process of alkaline hydrolysis of dimethyl carbonate, in addition to NaCl, toxic methanol is formed. Furthermore, the procedure is time consuming, as it takes place in two stages, with one cycle lasting several hours (up to 24 hours), and there is a need to use repeated cycles (up to 4 times). Finally, the wood needs to be washed several times to remove the by-product, i.e. NaCl.

Technical problem

Technical problem solved by the proposed invention is mineralization of wood or wood composites with carbonates and/or hydroxides in a simpler and more efficient way, in order to improve the essential properties of wood and wood composites, i.e. resistance to fire, durability and mechanical properties. The definition of wood and wood composites includes wood of any moisture content, for example freshly-cut wood, wood at the fiber saturation point, air-dried, or absolutely dry wood, wood of any tree species, and wood subjected to any type of fiber pre-treatment, such as thermally-modified wood or wood previously exposed to ultrasound, used wood or wood composites. Through the process of mineralization, i.e. the transformation of organic matter to inorganic, the wood improves its resistance to fire, resistance to fungi, mechanical properties, durability and other properties. In this document, the term ‘reference wood’ will be used to represent any wood that has not been treated or modified, and will be used for comparison with the modified wood (that which has been mineralized or thermally modified or treated in some other way). In the document, the term ‘thermally modified wood’ is used to describe wood prepared by the commercial Silvapro^® process (G. Rep, F. Pohleven in S. Kosmerl, Wood modification - A promising method for wood preservation, Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Wood Modification, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, str. 11-17, 2012). In the process of thermal modification, spruce and beech were heated to 220 ° C, then the wood was conditioned for 4 weeks under laboratory conditions (T = 20 ° C; RH = 65%).

Wood mineralization takes place in two phases - namely, in the first phase, the wood is impregnated with an impregnating solution, an aqueous solution of acetoacetates, with one of the known impregnation methods (the most commonly used impregnation method involves exposing wood to an impregnating solution in an environment with varying vacuum and overpressure) so that the impregnating solution penetrates deep into the structure of the wood. The process of changing vacuum and overpressure generally results in the best impregnation properties (i.e. a more homogeneous distribution, deeper penetration, and greater absorption of the impregnating solution into the wood; H. Yorur, K. Kayahan, Improving impregnation and penetration properties of refractory woods through cryogenic treatment, BioResources. 13 (1) 2018, pp. 1829-1842). This process is followed by an after- treatment step, where the impregnating solution is transformed to carbonate and/or hydroxide. The advantage of the mineralization process proposed, over and above the methods used to date as described above, is that carbonate(s) and/or hydroxide(s) are formed only when the impregnating solution penetrates deep into the structure of wood or wood composites by means of a known impregnation method.

Description of the solution to the technical problem

The invention will be described below, and is also presented in the following figures:

Figure 1 shows the penetration depth of the impregnating solution in the spruce, both in the direction of the fibers and perpendicular to the fibers

Figure 2 shows SEM images of MgCO₃ (a, b) and CaCO₃ (c, d) mineralized spruce

Figure 3 shows microtomographic images of MgCO₃ (a, b) and CaCO₃ (c, d) mineralized beech, either transversely (a, c) or longitudinally (b, d)

Figure 4 shows diffractograms of reference spruce samples (a), CaCO₃ mineralized spruce (b), reference beech (c) and CaCO₃ mineralized beech (d)

Figure 5 shows the heat release rate (HRR) of reference spruce and MgCO₃ mineralized spruce

Figure 6 shows the heat release rate (HRR) of reference spruce, thermally modified spruce, MgCO₃ mineralized spruce and spruce which has been thermally modified and then mineralized with MgCO₃

Figure 7 shows the heat release rate (HRR) of reference beech and beech mineralized either once or twice with MgCO₃

Figure 8 shows the heat release rate (HRR) of reference beech, and beech mineralized with MgCO₃ , CaCO₃ and SrCO₃ Figure 9 shows the heat release rate (HRR) of reference beech, beech mineralized with CaCO₃ , beech mineralized with MgCO₃ , and beech mineralized with a mixture of CaCO₃ and MgCO₃ in a 50 : 50 weight ratio

Figure 10 shows the heat release rate (HRR) of the reference beech, beech mineralized with SrCO₃ or MgCO₃ , and beech mineralized with a mixture of SrCO₃ and MgCO₃ in a 50 : 50 weight ratio

Figure 11 shows the heat release rate (HRR) of reference beech, thermally modified beech, beech mineralized with CaCO₃ , and thermally modified beech mineralized with CaCO₃

Figure 12 shows the smoke growth rate index (SMOGRA) of reference beech and beech mineralized with CaCO₃

Figure 13 shows the contact angle for the reference spruce (a) and spruce samples mineralized with CaCO₃ (b) and MgCO₃ (c)

Figure 14 shows loss of mass from decomposition as a result of the presence of three different fungi Gloeophyllum trabeum (GT), Poria Monticola (PM) and Trametes versicolor (TV) in the reference samples (R), CaCO₃ mineralized samples (Ca), thermally modified samples (T) and thermally modified CaCO₃ mineralized (TCa) samples for both spruce and beech

Figure 15 shows the Brinell hardness of the reference (R), CaCO₃ mineralized (Ca), thermally modified (T), and thermally modified CaCO₃ mineralized (TCa) spruce samples

The wood mineralization process according to the invention comprises the following phases:

- an impregnation phase, wherein the wood is with the use of vacuum and/or overpressure impregnated with an impregnating agent, which is a solution of at least one metal beta- carboxylate or a mixture of different metal beta-carboxylates in a solvent, wherein the concentration of metal beta-carboxylate or a mixture of different metal beta-carboxylates in the solvent is up to 30% by weight and whereby the impregnating agent penetrates deep into the structure of the wood;

- an after-treatment phase of the impregnated wood, whereby by regulating the temperature, humidity and exposure time of the impregnated wood to these conditions or by exposing the impregnated wood to ultrasound the metal acetoacetate(s) is converted into carbonate(s) and / or hydroxide(s).

The suitable solvent is selected from water, alcohol, or a mixture of alcohol and water. The alcohol used is preferably ethanol, methanol or a mixture of the two.

Preferably the metal beta-carboxylate is a metal acetoacetate selected from calcium acetoacetate Ca(OAcAc)₂, magnesium acetoacetate Mg(OAcAc)₂, strontium acetoacetate Sr(OAcAc)₂ or aluminum acetoacetate Al(OAcAc)_3, or mixtures thereof in any weight ratio.

Preferably the solvent is water, and the metal acetoacetate solution is selected from aqueous solutions of calcium acetoacetate Ca(OAcAc)₂, magnesium acetoacetate Mg(OAcAc)₂, strontium acetoacetate Sr(OAcAc)₂ or aluminum acetoacetate Al(OAcAc)₃ or mixtures thereof in any weight ratio.

The process of impregnation using vacuum and/or overpressure involves impregnation of the wood using either the "full-" or "empty-" cell process. In the process of the "full" cell method, or the so-called "Bethell process", the wood is placed in an impregnation chamber and exposed to a vacuum below 100 mbar for a period of 30 to 60 minutes to remove air from the wood and impregnation chamber. The impregnating solution is then poured into the chamber while maintaining a constant vacuum. This is followed by exposure to a overpressure of above 10 bar, causing the impregnation solution to penetrate deep into the structure of the wood. Preferably, the wood is exposed to an overpressure above 10 bar for at least 180 minutes. Optionally, the excess impregnation solution is drained out using an additional vacuum below 100 mbar for at least 5 minutes {Emission Factor Documentation for AP-42 Section 10.8, Wood Preserving, Final Report, MRI project No. 4945, 1999, https ://www 3. epa. sov/tin/chief/ap42/ch 10/isdocs/b 10s08. pdf) . When using the "empty" cell method the most commonly used processes are "Rueping” and “Lowry". In the “Rueping process", the wood is first placed in an impregnation chamber and exposed to a pressure between 172 and 690 kPa for a period of a few minutes to 1 hour, then an impregnating solution is poured into the chamber at a maintained pressure in order to increase the pressure in the chamber and thus allow the solution to penetrate deep into the wood. The procedure continues until a sufficient amount of solution is absorbed. This is followed by removal of the impregnating solution, and, optionally, exposure of the samples to a vacuum. In the "Lowry process", an impregnating solution is poured into the chamber without maintaining the vacuum or overpressure. This is followed by exposure to overpressure until a sufficient amount of the solution has been absorbed into the wood. The final stage involves removal of the solution and optional exposure of the samples to a vacuum.

In all the impregnation processes, the wood is exposed to vacuum and/or overpressure until a sufficient amount of solution penetrates into the wood. The exposure time depends on the type and quality of the wood or wood composites. Preferably, the wood should be exposed to an overpressure above 10 bar for at least 180 minutes. Optionally, the wood can then be exposed to an additional vacuum below 100 mbar for at least 5 minutes in order to remove any excess solution.

Preferably, the exposure to the additional vacuum takes place at a vacuum between 50 and 60 mbar, for a period between 20 and 30 minutes.

Optionally, a modified "full" cell process can be used, where the wood is placed in an impregnation chamber filled with an impregnating solution, then first exposed to a vacuum below 100 mbar for between 30 and 60 min. The wood is then exposed to an overpressure above 10 bar until a sufficient amount of solution penetrates into the structure of the wood.

The impregnation phase may consist of one step or multiple steps. In a one-step process, as the impregnating agent the solution of a single metal acetoacetate, (for example only Ca(OAcAc)₂ or only Mg(OAcAc)₂), or a solution of a mixture of different metal acetoacetates in any weight ratio (for example a mixture of Mg(OAcAc)₂ and Ca(OAcAc)₂ in a weight ratio of 50 : 50) may be used

When the impregnation phase consists of multiple steps (a two-step or a multi-step impregnation), as the impregnating agent in each individual step either a solution of a single metal acetoacetate or a solution of a mixture of different metal acetoacetates in any weight ratio may be used, wherein the individual steps may follow each other in any order.

In one embodiment, for example in all steps, that is in each individual step, the wood or wood composites may be impregnated with the same metal acetoacetate(s) solution in each step, e.g. using a solution of either Ca(OAcAc)₂, Mg(OAcAc)₂, Sr(OAcAc)₂ or Al(OAcAc)₃, or alternatively using a solution containing a mixture of Ca(OAcAc)₂ and Mg(OAcAc)₂ in a 50:50 weight ratio. In another embodiment in each individual step, however, the wood or wood composites may be impregnated with different solutions in each step (containing different metal acetoacetates and / or various mixtures thereof in any weight ratio). In the first step, for example, the wood or wood composite may be impregnated with a Mg(OAcAc)₂ solution, followed by a second impregnation with a Ca(OAcAc)₂ solution; or, for example, in the first step, the wood or wood composite may be impregnated with a solution of Mg(OAcAc)₂, in the second step a solution containing Mg(OAcAc)₂ and Ca(OAcAc)₂ mixed in a weight ratio of 50:50 may be used; or, for example, in the first step the wood or wood composite may be impregnated with a solution containing a mixture of Mg(OAcAc)₂ and Ca(OAcAc)₂ in a weight ratio of 50:50, followed by a second step using a solution containing Mg(OAcAc)₂ and Sr(OAcAc)₂ mixed in a weight ratio of 50 : 50. The use of other concentrations, the use of aqueous or non-aqueous solutions of different metal acetoacetates in varying concentrations, or mixtures thereof in arbitrary ratios, and sequential impregnation with solutions or mixtures of individual metal acetoacetates (in any ratio), is therefore also possible.

Preferably, the impregnation phase is one-step and follows a modified "full" cell process, where the wood is placed in an impregnation vessel filled with an impregnating agent which is a 20% by weight aqueous solution of the metal acetoacetate(s). This is followed by 30 minutes exposure to a vacuum between 50 and 60 mbar, and 180 minutes at an overpressure between 10 and 12 bar. Optionally, a vacuum between 50 and 60 mbar is applied for another 20 to 30 minutes to remove any excess impregnation solution from the wood's structure.

The effectiveness of wood impregnation, i.e. the depth of penetration of the impregnating agent into the wood, and the amount of absorbed impregnating agent (degree of uptake), can be adjusted by the impregnation method, i.e. by choosing the impregnation process selected, most commonly by changing the values of overpressure and vacuum inside the chamber and the time of exposure of wood to these conditions. Another way to increase the efficiency of impregnation is to pre-treat the wood with ultrasound, preferably at a frequency of 28 kHz to 40 kHz and an intensity of 300 W, at a temperature between 40 °C and 100 °C for at least 30 minutes. This increases the diffusion of water, breaks microfibers on the cell walls, ruptures the membranes, and reduces the content of extractives, amongst other things (Z He, Z. Zhao, F. Yang, S. Yi, Effect of ultrasound pretreatment on wood prior to vacuum drying, Maderas, Ciencia y tecnologia, 16 (4) 2014, 395-402). A third way to increase the efficiency of impregnation is to add surfactants to the impregnating agents, which allow the impregnating agent to penetrate deeper into the wood structure.

Optionally, the impregnation phase may be followed by an intermediate phase, which is a drying phase of the impregnated wood, in which the impregnated wood is dried at room temperature for at least 1 day, preferably for 3 days, at room temperature, before entering the after-treatment phase.

The impregnation phase is followed by the after-treatment phase, in which the impregnating agent s converted to carbonate(s) and/or hydroxide(s).

In the after-treatment phase, the acetoacetate in the impregnated wood is converted to the corresponding carbonate depending on the metal acetoacetate solution selected in the impregnation phase, i.e. CaCO₃ , MgCO₃ , SrCO₃ or other carbonates, and/or the corresponding hydroxide, i.e. Al(OH)₃, or other hydroxides.

There are several possibilities for after-treatment, what they all have in common is to ensure the conversion of acetoacetates into carbonates or hydroxides. This is achieved by regulating the temperature, the relative humidity, and the time the impregnated wood is exposed to these conditions, or by using ultrasound at an elevated temperature. It is desirable to expose the impregnated wood to higher temperatures and relative humidity, preferably between 40 °C and 100 °C and at a relative humidity of at least 35%, as this accelerates the conversion of acetoacetate(s) to carbonate(s)/hydroxide(s). The conversion does take place at lower temperatures and humidity levels, but the time required becomes significantly extended. Impregnated wood can also be exposed to higher temperatures (T> 100 ° C) and lower relative humidity (RH <35%) for a suitable length of time. The conversion of acetoacetate(s) to carbonate(s)/ hydroxide (s) can also be accelerated through exposure to ultrasound, preferably at a frequency of 28 kHz - 40 kHz and an intensity of 300 W for at least 60 min, at an elevated temperature of between 40 °C and 100 °C.

The after-treatment phase can also take place under variable conditions, by dividing the entire phase into time intervals and defining a temperature and relative humidity for each interval. Time intervals can be the same length or different lengths. In one embodiment, conditions may be alternated using intervals of the same length, namely: 1^st step 8 h at 80 ° C and 90% RH, 2^nd step 8 h at 80 ° C and 40% RH, 3^rd step 8 h at 80 ° C and 90% RH, 4^th step 8 h at 80 ° C and 40% RH, 5^th step 8 h at 80 ° C and 90% RH, 6^th step 8 h at 80 ° C and 40% RH , and the 7^th stage 8 h at 80 ° C and 90% RH.

In a preferred embodiment, the after-treatment phase is carried out by placing the dry impregnated wood in a chamber where it is exposed to elevated temperatures of T = 80 ° C, with relative humidity of 40% and 90% being exchanged at equal time intervals.

In the presence of water or moisture in the air, the acetoacetate ion decomposes into a carbonate or hydroxide ion, carbon dioxide (CO₂), and acetone (CH₃COCH₃). The acetone and CO₂ evaporate, leaving solid carbonate or hydroxide. The conversion of metal acetoacetate to carbonate is shown in the following formula:

2 CH₃COCH₂COO- + H₂O CO₃ ²- + CO₂ + 2 CH₃COCH₃

Ca(OAcAc)₂, Mg(OAcAc)₂, Sr(OAcAc)₂ and Al(OAcAc)₃ decompose into their corresponding carbonate/hydroxide, according to the following formulas:

Ca(OAcAc)₂ + H₂O → CaCO₃ + CO₂ + 2 CH₃COCH₃

Mg(OAcAc)₂ + H₂O → MgCO₃ + CO₂ + 2 CH₃COCH₃

Sr(OAcAc)₂ + H₂O → SrCO₃ + CO₂ + 2 CH₃COCH₃

Al(OACAC)₃ + 3 H₂O → Al(OH)₃ + 3 CO₂ + 3 CH₃COCH₃

It is desirable to keep the mineralized wood at room temperature for at least another week before it is suitable for use, or to briefly expose it to vacuum conditions (for a couple of hours up to one day), or higher temperatures i.e. up to 60 °C.

The amount of impregnation solution introduced (wet uptake), and thus the amount of carbonate and/or hydroxide formed in the structure of the wood, depends on the type, geometry, humidity and pre-treatment of the wood composite the impregnation process selected and any potential additives in the impregnating solution. Larger amounts of carbonates and/or hydroxides can be introduced by adjusting the conditions (for example by increasing the vacuum and overpressure values) and by prolonging the impregnation time, by increasing the concentration of acetoacetate(s) in the impregnation solution(s), or by repeating the impregnation process (two or more times) using either the same or a different solution (for example by using a solution of Ca(OAcAc)₂ followed by a solution of Mg(OAcAc)₂), or even with a mixture of different impregnating solutions (for example an aqueous solution of Ca(OAcAc)₂ and Mg(OAcAc)₂ mixed in a 50:50 weight ratio).

The incorporation of carbonates or hydroxides (e.g. CaCO₃ , MgCO₃ , SrCO₃ and Al(OH₃)) into the structure of the wood reduces the flammability of wood, wood composites or wooden products, because decomposition of carbonates at higher temperatures is an endothermic process, which, together with the release of CO₂ and/or H₂O, cools flammable gases in the event of a fire. The carbonate(s) thermally decompose(s) into CO₂ and metal oxide, while the hydroxide(s) decompose into metal oxide and H₂O. The thermal decomposition of CaCO₃ , MgCO₃ , SrCO₃ and Al(OH)₃ is shown in the formulas below. MgCO₃ can thermally decompose into MgO, CO₂ and H₂O, as the conversion of Mg(OAcAc)₂ to MgCO₃ can result in the hydrated crystalline modification(s) of MgCO₃ (e.g. nesquehonite, which has the chemical formula MgCO₃ · 3H₂O).

~400°C

MgCO₃ ^→ MgO + CO₂

~700°C

CaCO₃ CaO + CO₂

~900°C SrCO₃ → SrO + CO₂

~200°C

2 Al(OH)₃ → A1₂0₃ + 3 H₂O

Examples

Example 1 : Preparation of aqueous acetoacetate solutions

To make the impregnating solutions (aqueous solutions of Ca(OAcAc)₂, Mg(OAcAc)₂ and Sr(OAcAc)₂ and Al(OAcAc)₃) 200 g of either CaCO₃ , MgCO₃ , SrCO₃ or Al(OH)₂ were added to a beaker. 1000 g of water was added and the mixture was stirred with a magnetic stirrer for approximately 10 minutes. Varying quantities of 1 ,3 -acetonedi carboxylic acid were then gradually added in small quantities: 615 g (for the preparation of Ca(OAcAc)₂), 713.9 g (for the preparation of Mg(OAcAc)₂), 407.45 g (for the preparation of Sr(OAcAc)₂) and 1157.5 g (for the preparation of Al(OAcAc)₃. In the preparation of aqueous solutions of Ca(OAcAc)₂, Mg(OAcAc)₂ and Sr(OAcAc)₂ the beaker was then placed in a 33 °C water bath for 16 hours, whereas mixing took place at room temperature when preparing the A1(OACAC)₃ aqueous solution. Once synthesis was complete, the solution was filtered and diluted to a concentration of 20% by weight.

Example 2: The impregnation phase in wood and wood composites

The impregnation phase was carried out using a one-step impregnation process, by directly placing the wood samples in a 20% by weight Ca(OAcAc)₂, Mg(OAcAc)₂, Sr(OAcAc)₂ or A1(OACAC)₃ solution, prepared according to the procedure described in Example 1. The samples were then exposed to a 50-60 mbar vacuum for 30 minutes, followed by 3 hours at 8-10 bar and subsequently another 20-30 min at a vacuum of 50-60 mbar.

The penetration in the grain direction was prevented by coating based on epoxy resin.

Example 3 : After-treatment phase of wood and wood composites

In the after-treatment phase, the impregnated wood samples (prepared according to Example 2) were first dried at room temperature for at least 3 days, then exposed to an elevated temperature and relative humidity for the following amounts of time: 1^st step 8 h at 80 °C and 90% RH, 2^nd step 8 h at 80 °C and 40% RH, 3^rd step 8 h at 80 °C and 90% RH, 4^th step 8 h at 80 °C and 40% RH, 5^th step 8 h at 80 °C and 90% RH, 6^th step 8 h at 80 °C and 40% RH, 7^th step 8 h at 80 °C and 90% RH.

The mineralized wood was then aged at room temperature for one week.

Example 4: Determining the degree of impregnation

Samples of spruce and beech wood were prepared as described in examples 1 to 3. With a single impregnation of Mg(OAcAc)₂ solution we were able to introduce 110 wt.% Mg(OAcAc)₂ into spruce, meaning 9.2 wt.% of the resulting MgCO₃ (dry intake) was absorbed into the structure of the wood. In the same wood, using a single impregnation of Ca(OAcAc)₂ solution, we were able to introduce 137 wt.% Ca(OAcAc)₂, meaning 12.1 wt.% of the CaCO₃ formed in the wood’s structure. In beech samples, 84% by weight of Mg(OAcAc)₂ was introduced with a single impregnation (meaning 6.9% by weight of the MgCO₃ formed), compared to 86% by weight of Ca(OAcAc)₂, (meaning 5.6% by weight of the CaCO₃ formed).

The results are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Mass of spruce or beech samples before impregnation, mass of samples after impregnation, calculated proportions re wet uptake of impregnating solutions (aqueous solutions of Mg(OAcAc)₂ and Ca(OAcAc)₂), and share of the dry uptake (proportion of MgCO₃ / CaCO₃ ) by weight in mineralized spruce and beech samples.

Example 5: Determining the penetration depth of the impregnating agent

The penetration depth of the impregnating solution was checked in both the fiber direction and perpendicular to the fibers by impregnating a 140 mm (1) x 100 mm (w) x 10 mm (h) mm wood sample with an aqueous solution of Ca (OAcAc)₂, according to Examples 1 and 2. Following this, the samples were dried at room temperature for 2 days, after which the impregnated samples were cut through the middle both transversely and longitudinally, as shown in Figure 1. An indicator i.e. 10% aqueous sodium nitroprusside solution (Na₂[Fe(CN)₅(NO)] · 2H₂O; Sigma Aldrich) was then applied to each cross-section, by placing the cut side of the sample onto a napkin impregnated with the indicator. The red colour, which identifies the presence of acetoacetates, develops in about 30 minutes. As shown in Figure 1, the impregnating solution evenly penetrates into the spruce to a depth of at least 5 mm in the direction perpendicular to the fibers and at least 7 cm in the direction of the fibers. In this particular case, the entire depth of the sample was impregnated.

Example 6 _^Determination of carbonate distribution throughout the structure of the wood

Following the mineralization of spruce or beech with either MgCO₃ or CaCO₃ (as described in examples 1 to 3), the distribution of carbonate through the structure of the wood was determined. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and microtomography (μCT) images show that, in spruce wood, MgCO₃ (Fig. 2a, b) and CaCO₃ (Fig. 2c, d) precipitate along the entire length of the tracheid. The locations of MgCO₃ or CaCO₃ are marked with arrows in Figures 2 and 3. In beech wood, however, MgCO₃ is primarily formed in the trachea (Fig. 3a, b), while CaCO₃ mainly precipitates in the tracheids and parenchymal cells (Fig. 3c, d). In both types of wood used (spruce and beech), MgCO₃ formed in an elongated shape (Figure 2b, Figure 3b), while CaCO₃ was spherical (Figure 2d, Figure 3d), occurring in varying sizes up to 100 pm in diameter.

Example 7: Determination of the crystal carbonate structure within the wood

Figure 4 shows the diffractograms of reference spruce (a), CaCO₃ mineralized spruce (b), reference beech (c), and CaCO₃ mineralized beech (d), each prepared as described in Examples 1 to 3. The patterns of spruce mineralized with CaCO₃ correspond to vaterite crystal modification. The diffractograms on the right (Figure 4b and d) are marked with dots where the patterns do not overlap with those of the reference spruce or beech but instead are characteristic for vaterite CaCO₃ crystal modification (marked with V).

Example 8: Determining the effect of wood mineralization on improving the wood response to fire

Reaction to fire was determined using a cone calorimeter according to ISO 5660-1 :2015, for all of the following samples in both beech and spruce, each prepared as described in examples 1 to 3: (a) reference, (b) mineralized with MgCO₃ or CaCO₃ or SrCO₃ , (c) thermally modified then mineralized with MgCO₃ or CaCO₃ , (d) twice mineralized with MgCO₃ (beech only), and (e) mineralized with a mixture of either MgCO₃ and SrCO₃ or MgCO₃ and CaCO_{3 ,} each in a 50 : 50 mass ratio. Specimens of dimensions 100 mm (1) x 100 mm (w) x 10 mm (h) were exposed to a heat flux of 50 kW/m². The results are shown in Table 2; average values and standard deviations of ignition time, total heat release in the first 600 seconds of the test (THR_600s), and smoke growth rate index (FIGRA) are listed for all specimens. Figures 5 and 6 show two examples of heat release rate (HRR) in the specimens made of spruce, while Figures 7 to 11 show examples of beech wood. An example of the smoke growth rate index (SMOGRA) in a specimen from beech wood is shown in Figure

12.

In both spruce and beech the fire characteristics measured (ignition time, THR_600s and FIGRA) are significantly better in the mineralized samples compared to either the reference (R) or thermally modified (T) samples. The average time to ignition in the reference spruce was 20.8 s, which increased considerably following mineralization with MgCO₃ , CaCO₃ or S1CO₃, to values of 31.8 s, 29.2 s and 23.2 s respectively. Total heat release, THR_600s, slightly decreased after mineralization with MgCO₃ (from 21.0 MJ to 19.1 MJ), but did not change significantly after mineralization with either CaCO₃ or S1CO₃. A considerable decrease in the average FIGRA value was observed following the mineralization of spruce (falling from 372.6 Ws^-1 to 223.0 Ws^-1, 255.7 Ws^-1 and 349.4 Ws^-1 for MgCO₃ , CaCO₃ and SrCO₃ respectively). The positive effect of carbonates as flame retardants in the burning of wood can be explained by the endothermic nature of their thermal decomposition: since MgCO₃ thermally decomposes at approximately 400°C, CaCO₃ at around 700 °C, and SrCO₃ at around 900 °C, MgCO₃ is expected to be the most effective flame retardant. We have also verified the effectiveness of the mineralization of spruce, utilising various mixtures of carbonates, with regard to its reaction to fire. In comparison to spruce mineralized with MgCO_{3 ,} the mineralization of spruce with MgCO₃ and CaCO₃ in a 50 : 50 mass ratio (indicated in Table 2 by Ca:Mg) slightly increases ignition time, to 34.6 s, while FIGRA decreases considerably, to 187.2 Ws^-1, and THR_600s remains the same. No considerable improvement in fire characteristics was noticed following mineralization with a mixture of MgCO₃ and SrCO₃ ; all values remain similar to those of spruce mineralized with MgCO₃ . The effect of mineralization on the fire properties of beech exhibited a similar trend, yet with an even greater improvement. In comparison to the reference sample, the ignition time increased following mineralization with MgCO₃ from 29.8 s (R) to 46.2 s (MgCO₃ ), THR_600s decreased from 43.5 MJ (R) to 31.3 MJ (MgCO₃ ), and FIGRA decreased from 530.3 Ws^-1 (R) to 203.9 Ws^-1 (MgCO₃ ). In the case of beech, we evaluated the effect of double mineralization with MgCO₃ and found that fire behaviour was improved even further (indicated in Table 2 by MgCO₃-2x): ignition time increased to 54.8 s, while THR_600s and FIGRA decreased further to 25.7 MJ and 167.2 W s^-1, respectively.

It is known that thermal modification increases resistance to fungi but impairs the reaction to fire (N. Yilor, S.N. Kartal, Heat Modification of Wood: Chemical Properties and Resistance to Mold and Decay Fungi, Forest Products Journal, 60 (4) 2010, 357-361 in H. Sivrikaya, A. Can, T. de Troya, M. Conde, Comparative Biological Resistance of Differently Thermal Modified Wood Species Against Decay Fungi, Reticulitermes grassei and Hylotrupes hajulus, Ciencia y tecnologia, 17 (3) 2015, 559-570 ). We examined the fire properties of thermally modified beech and spruce and the influence of mineralization with MgCO₃ or CaCO₃ on the improvement of its reaction to fire. In both spruce and beech, thermally modified samples (marked T in Table 2 - upper part) exhibited poorer fire properties than the reference samples (marked R in Table 2). Thermally modified spruce has an ignition time of 20.0 s, THR_600s of 30.4 MJ and FIGRA of 488.6 Ws^-1. Following mineralization with MgCO₃ (marked T- MgCO₃ in Table 2), the ignition time increased to 32.4 s, while the THR_600s and FIGRA decreased to 15.6MJ and 191.5 Ws^-1 respectively. These values are even better than those of spruce which had only been mineralized and not previously thermally modified (marked MgCO₃ in Table 2). Furthermore, fire properties improve following the mineralization of previously thermally modified spruce with CaCO₃ (marked T-CaCO₃ in Table 2), but to a slightly lesser extent. It can be seen in the heat release rate curves of the spruce samples (Figures 5 and 6) that the time to ignition delays (the peak of the curve for mineralized spruce moves to the right compared to the curve for the reference spruce), and that the heat release rate of the mineralized wood samples also delays and decreases compared to the reference spruce. Similar to the findings for the spruce, mineralization significantly improves the fire properties of beech which has been previously thermally modified. It can be seen in the lower part of Table 2 that the thermally modified beech (mark T) has an ignition time of 26.5 s, THR_600s of 46.0 MJ and FIGRA of 662.9 Ws^'

1

After mineralization with MgCO₃ (marked T-MgCO₃ ) the ignition time increases to 45.3 s, THR_600s decreases to 24.2 MJ and FIGRA decreases to 173.6 Ws^-1. Similar values were observed after mineralization with CaCO₃ (marked T-CaCO₃ ). This synergistic effect of mineralization alongside thermal modification is also observed in beech - the fire properties of wood are best when these two modification methods are combined. It can be seen from the curves of heat release rate in beech samples (Figures 7 to 11) that the ignition time is delayed in mineralized samples (the top of the curve shifts to the right in the mineralized beech relative to the curve of the reference beech). Similarly, the heat release rate of the mineralized samples is also delayed and decreased in comparison to the reference samples. In Figure 12 it can be seen that the smoke growth rate index (SMOGRA) for the sample mineralized with MgCO₃ is significantly decreased and shifted to the right in comparison to the reference sample.

Table 2: Ignition time, total heat release, THR_600s and fire growth rate index (FIGRA) for the various spruce and beech samples: reference (R); thermally modified (T); mineralized with MgCO₃ (MgCO₃ ), CaCO₃ (CaCO₃ ), or SrCO₃ (SrCO₃ ); thermally modified and mineralized with MgCO₃ (T-MgCO₃ ) or CaCO₃ (T-CaCO₃ ); twice mineralised with MgCO₃ (MgCO₃ - 2x-beech only); mineralized with mixtures of MgCO₃ and SrCO₃ (Mg: Sr) or MgCO₃ and CaCO₃ (Ca:Mg) (results are presented as the average value and standard deviation of five measurements).

Ignition time / s THR_600s / MJ FIGRA / Ws^-1

R 20.8 ± 2.6 21.0 ± 0.4 372.6 ± 50.3

T 20.0 ± 1.0 30.4 ± 0.4 488.6 ± 52.0

MgCO₃ 31.8 ± 4.5 19.1 ± 1.5 223.0 ± 35.7 spruce

T-MgCO₃ 32.4 ± 5.9 15.6 ± 0.8 191.5 ± 40.3

CaCO₃ 29.2 ± 1.3 21.6 ± 0.5 255.7 ± 14.3

T-CaCO₃ 30.0 ± 4.6 20.8 ± 2.0 225.1 ± 43.6

SrCO₃ 23.2 ± 3.2 23.5 ± 4.4 349.4 ± 57.8 Ca:Mg 34.6 ± 4.8 19.4 ± 1.4 187.2 ± 27.7

Mg: Sr 31.8 ± 5.8 21.5 ± 4.8 246.1 ± 93.8

R 29.8 ± 3.8 43.5 ± 2.7 530.3 ± 51.0

T 26.5 ± 0.7 46.0 ± 1.0 662.9 ± 0.6

MgCO₃ 46.2 ± 3.8 31.3 ± 1.9 203.9 ± 20.7

MgCO₃ - 2x 54.8 ± 8.3 25.7 ± 5.0 167.2 ± 20.8 beech T-MgCO₃ 45.2 ± 3.8 24.2 ± 3.4 173.6 ± 10.0

CaCO₃ 46.8 ± 6.2 31.8 ± 2.1 217.2 ± 9.4

T-CaCO₃ 46.3 ± 4.0 25.5 ± 2.3 198.6 ± 20.2

SrCO₃ 40.2 ± 7.8 36.7 ± 4.8 266.5 ± 30.5

Ca:Mg 44.6 ± 9.3 30.3 ± 4.8 224.8 ± 30.0

Mg: Sr 45.8 ± 4.4 33.0 ± 2.1 222.3 ± 19.6

Example 9: Contact angle and pH value measurements for spruce wood

Using spruce mineralized with MgCO₃ or CaCO₃ (according to procedures 1 to 3), we used a Drop Shape Instrument FTA 1000 to measure the contact angle, forming a 2.5 μΐ ± 0.2 μΐ size drop and dropping it to the surface (Figure 13). The contact angle was measured immediately after the drop contacted the surface. From the results, calculated as an average of 10 measurements, we determined that the contact angle increases from 43 ° for the reference spruce, to 90 ° for spruce mineralized with MgCO₃ , and 142 ° for spruce mineralized with CaCO₃ (Table 3, Figure 13). With increased hydrophobicity water absorption is reduced, thus increasing dimensional stability and reducing the risk of wood- decay (i.e wood durability is increased).

The pH values of wood samples mineralized with MgCO₃ , CaCO₃ or SrCO₃ , and thermally modified wood samples additionally mineralized with MgCO₃ , CaCO₃ or SrCO₃ (prepared as described in examples 1 to 3) were measured by applying 3 ml of water on wood surface. The pH was then measured using a pH meter (Basic Titrino) with a flat electrode, and the average of five measurements calculated for the results. The unmodified spruce had a pH value of 5.5, compared to 6.8 for the thermally modified spruce (Table 4). Following mineralization with MgCO₃ the pH value increased to 9.4, after mineralization with CaCO₃ to 8.2 and after mineralization with SrCO₃ to 7.9. The results show that the pH values of samples which had been both thermally modified and mineralized spruce samples did not change significantly compared to those which had only undergone the mineralization process. A similar trend is observed in the beech. A slightly acidic environment is optimal for fungal growth and wood decay (pH values from 4.5 to 5; M. Humar, B. Lesar ,D. Krzisnikm, Tehnicna in estetska zivljenjska doba lesa. Acta Silvae et Ligni (121) 2020, 33- 48), as higher pH values can inhibit wood decay from fungal growth (N. Little, T. Schultz in D. Nicholas, Effect of different soils and pH amendments on brown-rot decay activity in a soil block test, Holzforschung 64 (5) 2010, str. 667-671). The high pH values of mineralized wood and thermally modified wood which is then mineralized can therefore increase its durability.

Table 3: Contact angles of reference spruce (R), and spruce samples mineralized with MgCO₃ and CaCO₃ . Results given are the average of 10 measurements.

R MgCO₃ CaCO₃

Contact angle / ° 43 ± 8 90 ± 6 142 ± 5

Table 4: pH values of the various spruce and beech samples; reference (R), thermally modified (T), mineralized with MgCO₃ (MgCO₃ ), thermally modified and mineralized with MgCO₃ (T-MgCO₃ ), mineralized with CaCO₃ (CaCO₃ ), thermally modified and mineralized with CaCO₃ (T-CaCO₃ ), mineralized with SrCO₃ (SrCO₃ ), and thermally modified and mineralized with SrCO₃ CT-SrCO₃ ). Results given are the average of 5 measurements. pH value

R T MgCO₃ T-MgCOs CaCO₃ T-CaCO₃ SrCO₃ T-SrCO₃

Spmce 5.5 ± 0.3 6.8 ± 0.9 9.4 ± 0.1 9.2 ± 0.2 8.2 ± 0.2 7.9 ± 0.2 7.9 ± 0.1 7.8 ± 0.1

Beech 5.4 ± 0.5 5.2 ± 0.4 9.4 ± 0.3 9.1 ± 0.2 8.1 ± 0.3 7.9 ± 0.1 8.0 ± 0.1 7.7 ± 0.1 Example 10: Durability against decay fungi

In accordance with standard EN 113:1996, resistance to decay fungi was determined in reference spruce and beech samples, and previously thermally modified spruce and beech samples mineralized with CaCO₃ according to procedures 1 to 3. For each wood species (spruce and beech), we prepared three different sample sets sized 50 mm (1) x 25 mm (w) x 15 mm (h), three times (in order to expose each set to three different types of wood decay fungi). The first set of samples consisted of 5 parallels of reference wood (spruce or beech) and 5 parallels of thermally modified wood, the second set contained 5 parallels of reference wood and 5 parallels of wood mineralized with CaCO₃ , and the third set 5 parallels of reference wood and 5 parallels of wood which had been both thermally modified and mineralized with CaCO₃ . Before exposure to the fungi, the samples were dried to an absolutely dry state and weighed. Prior to exposure to the fungi, the samples were conditioned under laboratory conditions for two weeks. Samples were exposed to 3 different wood decay fungi: Gloeophyllum trabeum (GT), Poria monticola (PM) and Trametes versicolor (TV). After 16 weeks of exposure, samples were absolutely dried and weighed again and mass loss, attributed to the fungal decay of the wood, was determined.The highest mass loss determined (approximately 40 %) was seen in the reference beech and spruce samples exposed to the GT fungus (Figure 14a). It can be seen that mineralization with CaCO₃ inhibits the decomposition of wood with GT. Mass loss in the mineralized samples was approximately 20 % for beech and 35% for spruce. As expected, a much lower mass loss was seen in the thermally modified samples, totalling approximately 8 % in beech and 14 % in spruce. It is known that thermal modification increases resistance to wood decay fungi (N. Yilor, S.N. Kartal, Heat Modification of Wood: Chemical Properties and Resistance to Mold and Decay Fungi, Forest Products Journal, 60 (4) 2010, 357-361 ). Hemi cellulose, which is an excellent food for microorganisms, is decomposed during the process of thermal modification. Mineralization of wood that has been previously thermally modified further increases its resistance to GT fungus. The smallest mass losses were determined in samples which had been first thermally modified and then mineralized with CaCO₃ ; approximately 5% in beech and 10% in spruce. The resistance of wood samples to PM and TV fungi exhibited a similar trend to that of those with GT. The highest mass loss was exhibited in the reference samples of spruce and beech, while samples which had been thermally modified, mineralized, or both, showed a significantly better resistance to the PM and TV fungi (Figure 14b-c).

Example 11 : Determining the resistance to indentation (Brinell hardness)

The influence of mineralization on the hardness of spruce was determined in reference samples as well as in samples which had been thermally modified and then mineralized with CaCO₃ according to methods 1 to 3. Resistance to indentation (Brinell hardness) was determined. The preparation of samples and all measurements were performed in accordance with European standard EN 1534: 2020. A hardened steel ball, 10 mm ± 0.01 mm in diameter, was pressed into the surface of the wood, in the radial direction, with a force of 1 kN, as prescribed by the standard. The ball was pushed in wood and then up to three minutes the diameter of the indentation was measured with respect to the wood fibers in the longitudinal and transverse directions using a magnifying glass equipped with a scale accurate to 0.1 mm. The hardness (HB) was then calculated using these measurements, as specified in the standard. The results of the reference, thermally modified, CaCO₃ mineralized and thermally modified plus CaCO₃ mineralized spruce samples are given in Figure 17 (HB values are stated as an average of 10 measurements). Results show that mineralization increases the hardness of spruce wood from 13 N/mm² in the reference samples to 17 N/mm² in the mineralized spruce. Thermally modified spruce had a similar hardness to the reference sample (13 N/mm²), while the sample which had been both thermally modified and mineralized had a slightly higher hardness (15 N/mm²). We found that mineralization with CaCO₃ increased the hardness of both the reference and thermally modified spruce wood.

Claims

Patent claims

1. A process of wood mineralization comprising the following phases:

- an impregnation phase, wherein the wood is with the use of vacuum and/or overpressure impregnated with an impregnating agent, which is a solution of at least one metal beta- carboxylate or a mixture of different metal beta-carboxylates in a solvent, wherein the concentration of metal beta-carboxylate or a mixture of different metal beta-carboxylates in the solvent is up to 30% by weight and whereby the impregnating agent penetrates deep into the structure of the wood;

- an after-treatment phase of the impregnated wood, whereby by regulating the temperature, humidity and exposure time of the impregnated wood to these conditions or by exposing the impregnated wood to ultrasound the metal acetoacetate(s) is converted into carbonate(s) and / or hydroxide(s).

2. The process of wood mineralization according to claim 1, wherein the solvent is selected from water, alcohol or a mixture of alcohol and water, and the metal beta-carboxylate is a metal acetoacetate selected from calcium acetoacetate Ca(OAcAc)₂, magnesium acetoacetate Mg(OAcAc)₂, strontium acetoacetate Sr(OAcAc)₂ or aluminum acetoacetate A1(OACAC)₃ or mixtures thereof in any weight ratio.

3. The process of wood mineralization according to Claims 1 and 2, wherein the solvent is water and the aqueous solution of metal acetoacetate is selected from aqueous solutions of calcium acetoacetate Ca(OAcAc)₂, magnesium acetoacetate Mg(OAcAc)₂, strontium acetoacetate or aluminum acetoacetate Al(OAcAc)₃ or mixtures thereof in any weight ratio.

4. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein the impregnation process using vacuum and / or overpressure comprises the impregnation of wood using either the "full" or "empty" cell process, wherein the wood is exposed to an overpressure of 10 bar for at least 180 minutes.

5. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein the impregnation phase is a one-step or a multi-step, wherein as the impregnating agent in each individual step either the solution of a single metal acetoacetate or the solution of a mixture of different metal acetoacetates is used, and wherein the individual steps follow each other in any order.

6. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein the impregnation phase is followed by an additional exposure of wood to a vacuum below 100 mbar for a period of at least 5 minutes for removal of the excess impregnation solution.

7. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein the impregnation phase is one-step, where the wood is placed in an impregnation vessel filled with an impregnating agent which is a 20% by weight aqueous solution of the metal acetoacetate(s), followed by 30 minutes exposure to a vacuum between 50-60 mbar, and then 180 minutes exposure to an overpressure between 10-12 bar, followed by another 20 to 30 minutes exposure to a vacuum between 50-60 mbar for removal of the excess impregnation solution.

8. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein the impregnation phase is followed by an intermediate phase which is a drying phase of the impregnated wood, in which the impregnated wood is dried at room temperature for at least 1 day, preferably 3 days.

9. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein in the after-treatment phase the impregnated wood is exposed to a temperature between 40 °C and 100 °C and a relative humidity of at least 35%.

10. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein the after- treatment phase is carried out under constant conditions, whereby the impregnated wood is exposed to the same conditions, that is the same temperature and the same relative humidity, throughout the after-treatment phase.

11. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein the after- treatment phase is carried out under variable conditions, whereby the duration of the after- treatment phase is divided into time intervals, and each time interval having a defined temperature and relative humidity, and the time intervals are of the same length or of different length.

12. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein in the after-treatment phase the impregnated dry wood is placed in a chamber where it is exposed to elevated temperature of T = 80 °C, and wherein the relative humidity of 40% and 90% is exchanged at equal time intervals.

13. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein in the after-treatment phase the impregnated wood is exposed to ultrasound at a frequency of 28 kHz - 40 kHz and an intensity of 300 W for at least 60 min, at a temperature between 40 °C and 100 °C.

14. The process of wood mineralization according to the preceding claims, wherein wood includes wood of any moisture content, for example fresh wood, wood at fiber saturation point, air-dry, or absolutely dry wood, wood of any tree species, and wood of any pretreatment, for example thermally modified wood, used wood, or wood composites.

15. Use of a process according to claims 1 to 14 for the improvement of fire properties, resistance to decaying fungi and/or mechanical properties of wood.