EP2977487B1 - Method for smoothing the surface of a coating - Google Patents
Method for smoothing the surface of a coating Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2977487B1 EP2977487B1 EP14178573.3A EP14178573A EP2977487B1 EP 2977487 B1 EP2977487 B1 EP 2977487B1 EP 14178573 A EP14178573 A EP 14178573A EP 2977487 B1 EP2977487 B1 EP 2977487B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- coating
- roughness
- thermal barrier
- ceramic thermal
- barrier coating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C24/00—Coating starting from inorganic powder
- C23C24/08—Coating starting from inorganic powder by application of heat or pressure and heat
- C23C24/082—Coating starting from inorganic powder by application of heat or pressure and heat without intermediate formation of a liquid in the layer
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C28/00—Coating for obtaining at least two superposed coatings either by methods not provided for in a single one of groups C23C2/00 - C23C26/00 or by combinations of methods provided for in subclasses C23C and C25C or C25D
- C23C28/04—Coating for obtaining at least two superposed coatings either by methods not provided for in a single one of groups C23C2/00 - C23C26/00 or by combinations of methods provided for in subclasses C23C and C25C or C25D only coatings of inorganic non-metallic material
- C23C28/042—Coating for obtaining at least two superposed coatings either by methods not provided for in a single one of groups C23C2/00 - C23C26/00 or by combinations of methods provided for in subclasses C23C and C25C or C25D only coatings of inorganic non-metallic material including a refractory ceramic layer, e.g. refractory metal oxides, ZrO2, rare earth oxides
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01D—NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
- F01D5/00—Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
- F01D5/12—Blades
- F01D5/28—Selecting particular materials; Particular measures relating thereto; Measures against erosion or corrosion
- F01D5/288—Protective coatings for blades
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05D—INDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
- F05D2230/00—Manufacture
- F05D2230/90—Coating; Surface treatment
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for smoothing the rough surface of thermal barrier coatings (TBC's) which are used for protection of thermal high loaded components, such as gas turbine blades, vanes or combustor parts.
- TBC's thermal barrier coatings
- smoothing the surface of the coating means that the roughness of said surface is reduced.
- gas turbine components are made of alloys, for example Ni-, Co- or Fe-based superalloys, which can resist high temperatures of more than 1000 °C there is a need for further increasing the operating temperature of the turbines to improve the efficiency of the gas turbines.
- This can be achieved among others for example by applying a thermal barrier coating onto the surface of the superalloy component.
- Most of the applied TBC's are ceramic-based coatings, preferably yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ). Such a material has a much higher temperature resistance than the above mentioned superalloys.
- the TBC's are usually applied by thermal spray techniques, such as plasma spray processes like APS (Air/Atmospheric Plasma Spraying), VPS (Vacuum Plasma Spraying) or the very expensive EB-PVD (Electron Beam Physical Vapor Deposition).
- plasma spray processes like APS (Air/Atmospheric Plasma Spraying), VPS (Vacuum Plasma Spraying) or the very expensive EB-PVD (Electron Beam Physical Vapor Deposition).
- APS technique is cheaper with respect to EB-PVD, but it has the disadvantage of a relative rough surface which can cause problems with respect to aerodynamic drag losses of appropriate coated gas turbine components.
- surface roughness increases turbulent heat transfer from the hot combustion gases to the component and thus reduces aerodynamic performance.
- the efficacy of the TBC is improved by introducing porosity in to the coating.
- this inherent porosity will place a limit on the smoothness.
- the polishing process can open the closed pores.
- a component used in a high-temperature environment such as the combustor section of a gas turbine, is coated with a TBC made of yttria-stabilized zirconia, which provides the thermal protection for the substrate of the component.
- a bond coat for example made of MCrAlY, is applied between the substrate and the TBC to promote adhesion of the TBC.
- the TBC is sprayed onto the bond coat by APS which results in a certain degree of inhomogeneity and porosity and in a rough surface of about 5-13 ⁇ m Ra. This leads to problems with respect to erosion resistance, transmissivity to infrared radiation and aerodynamic performance.
- the TBC is over-coated by a multilayer outer coating which is formed of two layers having different compositions.
- An inner layer of the coating contains alumina in a first silica-containing matrix material that is free of zinc titanate.
- An outer layer of the coating contains alumina, a glass material and zinc titanate in a second silica-containing matrix material.
- the thickness, structure and properties of the outer coating can be tailored by the firing temperature and durations used for each inner and outer layer.
- the outer layer of the coating has a low surface roughness Ra ⁇ 3 ⁇ m and forms the outermost surface of the component. As a result the new coating reduces the component temperature by reducing the convective and radiant heat transfer thereto. But the deposition of two different layers to the underlying TBC is expensive.
- US 2007/0099013 A1 discloses also a method for manufacturing a TBC coated machine component, wherein a "smooth coat" ceramic layer is applied onto the component subsequent to the TBC. Because some of these smooth coat materials do not have a good adherence to the underlying TBC the smooth coat layer may spall during curing. To overcome the chipping of the smooth layer it is proposed in this document to deposit two TBC's, the outer thermal barrier coating having a higher porosity than the inner one, such to reduce the risk of delamination of the smooth coating layer. Such a solution is also cost intensive due to the necessity to deposit two different layers of TBC that means an additional layer of TBC is required.
- the method for smoothing the surface of the protective coating includes the steps of applying the slurry/gel to the TBC surface, heating the slurry/gel coating to remove volatile material and then further heating to cure the coating and bond it to the underlying protective coating.
- a slurry comprising zirconia means a good match of the thermal expansion coefficient of the TBC and the smooth layer. Matching the composition is a good way to reduce the thermo-mechanical stresses, but if the coating is too thick it will not prevent the formation of vertical cracks in the smooth layer. Unfortunately, such cracks reduce the aerodynamic efficiency of the smooth coating reducing the benefit of the coating.
- the challenge according to those documents is to provide a smooth layer that has a low roughness (Ra ⁇ 6 ⁇ m, preferentially ⁇ 3 ⁇ m) without reducing the lifetime of the underlying thermal barrier coating.
- the roughness that can be achieved with the smooth layer is strongly affected by the layer porosity. Therefore a low porosity in the coating prior to polishing ( ⁇ 1 %) is necessary.
- the coating is stiff with a high Young's modulus. Due to this high modulus, thermo-mechanical stresses linked to the difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion between the smooth layer and the underlying TBC can be sufficient to induce cracking in one or both coatings. Depending on the coating architecture this can lead either to early TBC spallation or to smooth layer chipping and reduction of the aerodynamic performance.
- the disclosed method for reducing the roughness of a first coating with a defined coating composition and a thermal expansion coefficient, said coating covering the surface of a component to be thermally high loaded comprises that
- the last mentioned step is done by polishing the slurry down to the point where the "peaks” in the underlying TBC roughness are at the surface (visibly), and only the “valleys” in the TBC roughness remain filled with slurry coating.
- the coating has to be manufactured such that it is dense, fully cured but only partially sintered to avoid too much recrystallization of the filler material.
- the slurry coating can be described as a "machinable ceramic".
- the curing resp. partially sintering of the slurry coating is done at a temperature in the range of 500 to 800 °C.
- the slurry coating is a zirconia based slurry coating with a small amount of alumina silicate or zirconium silicate.
- the zirconia can be un-stabilized or preferably stabilized, more preferably stabilized with Y 2 O 3 , CaO, MgO or any combinations thereof.
- the slurry coating binder is a silicate solution, phosphate solution or silicon emulsion.
- the first coating is a ceramic thermal barrier coating (TBC), preferably made of chemically stabilized zirconia. By using those materials it is realized that the thermal expansion coefficients of both coatings are close to each other.
- the described method is for coating systems where the first coating is applied by atmospheric plasma spraying and has therefore a relative high roughness and high porosity, which can cause the above described disadvantages, for example reduction of aerodynamic performance.
- the disclosed coating system for surface protection of a thermally high loaded component which is produced with a method according to claims 1 is characterized in that the coating system consists of a first underlying coating and a second slurry coating overlaying the first coating, wherein both coatings (1, 2) have a chemical composition with a similar thermal expansion coefficient, and wherein the second coating is very dense with a porosity ⁇ 1%, fully cured, but only partly sintered and wherein the second coating does only cover locally the first coating, so that said coating system finally comprises a reduced roughness with respect to the roughness of the originally applied first coating.
- the coating system for surface protection of a thermally loaded component has a second coating which is only completely sintered as a result of the first firing in the engine.
- the disclosed coating system is applied onto the surface of a gas turbine component made of a Ni-, Co-, Fe-based superalloy or combinations thereof, wherein the first coating is a ceramic thermal barrier coating, preferably made of chemically stabilized zirconia and the second coating is made by applying of a zirconia based slurry.
- the present invention is related to a method for smoothing the rough surface of thermal barrier coatings (TBC's) which are used for protection of thermal high loaded components, such as gas turbine blades, vanes or combustor parts.
- TBC's thermal barrier coatings
- TBC's especially applied by atmospheric plasma spraying methods onto the surface of above mentioned components have a relative high roughness.
- For improving the aerodynamic behavior which allows increasing the turbine efficiency it is necessary to provide a smooth surface layer by an efficient method which is cheaper and faster with respect to the known methods in the prior art. Additionally, to improve perform in-service the smooth surface layer needs to be thinner.
- the present application discloses a method for reducing the roughness Ra of a first coating 1 with a defined coating composition and a thermal expansion coefficient, said coating 1 covering the surface of a component 3 to be thermally high loaded, the method comprises that in a first step the roughness of said coating 1 is measured and in a following step a second slurry coating 2 is prepared for applying onto the surface of the first coating 1, whereby the coating composition of the second coating 2 is tailored to have a similar thermal expansion coefficient like the first coating 1.
- the method is characterized in
- the coating has to be manufactured such that it is dense, fully cured, but only partially sintered to avoid too much recrystallization of the filler material.
- the curing resp. partially sintering of the slurry coating is done at a temperature in the range of 500-800 °C.
- Fig. 1 shows a photo of the microstructure (cross section) of a typical TBC 1 with a smooth layer 2 on the top according to one embodiment of the invention, where the desired reduction in surface roughness is achieved.
- the smooth layer 2 is very thin to the extent that the slurry fills the "valleys" in the underlying TBC roughness.
- the "peaks" in the underlying TBC roughness are not covered by the slurry coating.
- the slurry is in the “valleys” of the underlying TBC roughness.
- the “peaks” in the underlying TBC roughness are not covered by the slurry coating.
- the embodiment in Fig. 1 is a component produced with the method according to the present disclosure.
- the component is made of Hastelloy X base material. It has an APS MCrAlY bond coat.
- the TBC (first coating 1) is APS 7 wt% yttria-stabilized zirconia.
- the slurry coating (second coating 2) is un-stabilized zirconia with the addition of a small amount of alumina silicate.
- the slurry coating binder was a water based silicon emulsion.
- the average initial TBC roughness Ra was 17.2 ⁇ m.
- the average initial TBC thickness was 941 ⁇ m, measured non-destructively with eddy-current equipment.
- the slurry coating was applied with a commercial paint sprayer. The number of spray passes N was 6.
- the eddy-current thickness measurements of the as sprayed slurry plus the TBC had an average value of 982 ⁇ m, thus the average slurry coting 2 thickness T was 41 ⁇ m.
- the slurry was cured at 700°C for 5h. After curing the slurry coating 2 was polished with a fine grit wet silicon-carbide paper. After polishing the finial average roughness Ra' was found to be 2.8 ⁇ m.
- the non-destructive eddy-current thickness measurements of the as smooth layer plus the TBC had an average value of 945 ⁇ m. From the cross section photos the deepest slurry filed "valley" depth was 21 ⁇ m.
- the partially sintered slurry coating 2 is inherently softer than the TBC coating 1.
- the abrasion rate is relatively high.
- the zirconia based slurry coating has a small amount of alumina silicate or zirconium silicate.
- the zirconia can be unstabilized or stabilized with Y 2 O 3 , CaO, MgO or any combinations thereof.
- the slurry coating binder is a silicate solution, phosphate solution or silicon emulsion.
- the first coating is a ceramic thermal barrier coating (TBC), preferably made of chemically stabilized zirconia. By using those materials it is realized that the thermal expansion coefficients of both coatings are close to each other.
- the described method is effective for coating systems where the first coating is applied by atmospheric plasma spraying and has therefore a relative high roughness, which can cause the above described disadvantages, for example reduction of aerodynamic performance.
- the disclosed coating system or surface protection of a thermally high loaded component which is produced with a method according to claims 1 is characterized in that the coating system consists of a first underlying coating and a second slurry coating overlaying the first coating, wherein both coatings 1, 2 have a chemical composition with a similar thermal expansion coefficient, and wherein the second coating is very dense with a porosity ⁇ 1%, fully cured, but only partly sintered and wherein the second coating does only cover locally the first coating, so that said coating system finally comprises a reduced roughness with respect to the roughness of the originally applied first coating.
- the coating system for surface protection of a thermally loaded component has a second coating which is only completely sintered as a result of the first firing in the engine.
- the disclosed coating system is applied onto the surface of a gas turbine component made of a Ni-, Co-, Fe-based superalloy or combinations thereof, wherein the first coating is a ceramic thermal barrier coating, preferably made of chemically stabilized zirconia and the second coating is made by applying of a zirconia based slurry.
- Fig. 2 shows schematically the results after different steps of the disclosed method.
- Fig. 2a shows the first coating 1 prior to the applying of the second coating - the high roughness Ra is clearly to be seen, it is about 8-18 ⁇ m.
- Fig. 2b shows the system with the first coating 1 and the applied second coating 2.
- the roughness of the first coating Ra is the same like in Fig. 2a , but the overlying coating 2 may provide a smooth surface however it is too thick (with an average thickness T ⁇ 2xRa) and may crack during serves.
- Fig. 2c shows the result after the last step of the described method according to claim 1.
- the coating system comprises the first coating 1 with the second coat 2 and a reduced roughness Ra' (which is about 1-6 ⁇ m) with respect to the originally applied coating 1.
- the reduced thickness T' of the second coating 2 is T' ⁇ Ra, such that finally the second coating 2 does cover the first coating 1 only locally.
- Fig. 3 shows in a photo the surface of a coating in service, when the smooth surface coating is too thick (prior art). A lot of undesired cracks can be recognized.
- Fig. 4 shows in a photo the surface of a coating system manufactured according to the present invention.
- the dark spots are the TBC appearing at the surface after the polishing step. Microcracks / cracks can't be recognized.
- the dark spots are the "peaks" in the underlying TBC roughness appearing at the surface.
- the durability of the coating is ensured, providing improved aerodynamic performance over a long period of operation. There is also no thermal barrier coating lifetime reduction due to the smoothened surface.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Coating By Spraying Or Casting (AREA)
- Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to a method for smoothing the rough surface of thermal barrier coatings (TBC's) which are used for protection of thermal high loaded components, such as gas turbine blades, vanes or combustor parts.
- Above mentioned surfaces of coatings exhibit a certain roughness. Within the meaning of the present application, smoothing the surface of the coating means that the roughness of said surface is reduced.
- It is known state of the art to use TBC's for improvement of the performance of metallic components which are exposed to high temperatures.
- Although gas turbine components are made of alloys, for example Ni-, Co- or Fe-based superalloys, which can resist high temperatures of more than 1000 °C there is a need for further increasing the operating temperature of the turbines to improve the efficiency of the gas turbines. This can be achieved among others for example by applying a thermal barrier coating onto the surface of the superalloy component. Most of the applied TBC's are ceramic-based coatings, preferably yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ). Such a material has a much higher temperature resistance than the above mentioned superalloys.
- The TBC's are usually applied by thermal spray techniques, such as plasma spray processes like APS (Air/Atmospheric Plasma Spraying), VPS (Vacuum Plasma Spraying) or the very expensive EB-PVD (Electron Beam Physical Vapor Deposition).
- APS technique is cheaper with respect to EB-PVD, but it has the disadvantage of a relative rough surface which can cause problems with respect to aerodynamic drag losses of appropriate coated gas turbine components. During operation of a gas turbine surface roughness increases turbulent heat transfer from the hot combustion gases to the component and thus reduces aerodynamic performance.
- Therefore, several methods are used for smoothing the surface of the coatings, for example mechanical methods like grinding, polishing or sandblasting. Those methods can have the disadvantage of damaging the surface.
- Additionally, the efficacy of the TBC is improved by introducing porosity in to the coating. However, when polishing the TBC, this inherent porosity will place a limit on the smoothness. The polishing process can open the closed pores.
- Another method is described in document
US 7368164 B2 . A component used in a high-temperature environment, such as the combustor section of a gas turbine, is coated with a TBC made of yttria-stabilized zirconia, which provides the thermal protection for the substrate of the component. A bond coat, for example made of MCrAlY, is applied between the substrate and the TBC to promote adhesion of the TBC. The TBC is sprayed onto the bond coat by APS which results in a certain degree of inhomogeneity and porosity and in a rough surface of about 5-13 µm Ra. This leads to problems with respect to erosion resistance, transmissivity to infrared radiation and aerodynamic performance. To overcome these drawbacks the TBC is over-coated by a multilayer outer coating which is formed of two layers having different compositions. An inner layer of the coating contains alumina in a first silica-containing matrix material that is free of zinc titanate. An outer layer of the coating contains alumina, a glass material and zinc titanate in a second silica-containing matrix material. The thickness, structure and properties of the outer coating can be tailored by the firing temperature and durations used for each inner and outer layer. The outer layer of the coating has a low surface roughness Ra< 3 µm and forms the outermost surface of the component. As a result the new coating reduces the component temperature by reducing the convective and radiant heat transfer thereto. But the deposition of two different layers to the underlying TBC is expensive. -
US 2007/0099013 A1 discloses also a method for manufacturing a TBC coated machine component, wherein a "smooth coat" ceramic layer is applied onto the component subsequent to the TBC. Because some of these smooth coat materials do not have a good adherence to the underlying TBC the smooth coat layer may spall during curing. To overcome the chipping of the smooth layer it is proposed in this document to deposit two TBC's, the outer thermal barrier coating having a higher porosity than the inner one, such to reduce the risk of delamination of the smooth coating layer. Such a solution is also cost intensive due to the necessity to deposit two different layers of TBC that means an additional layer of TBC is required. - Documents
US 6294261 B1 ,EP 1088908 A2 ,EP 2236650 A1 describe further methods respective smooth slurry/gel layers or multilayer coatings to be deposited on a TBC.US 6294261 B1 and.EP 1088908 A2 disclose for example a slurry/gel composition which is based on yttria-stabilized zirconia as refractory filler and precursors of an oxide matrix, for example an alumina or an aluminosilicate matrix. The method for smoothing the surface of the protective coating (YSZ TBC) includes the steps of applying the slurry/gel to the TBC surface, heating the slurry/gel coating to remove volatile material and then further heating to cure the coating and bond it to the underlying protective coating. Using a slurry comprising zirconia means a good match of the thermal expansion coefficient of the TBC and the smooth layer. Matching the composition is a good way to reduce the thermo-mechanical stresses, but if the coating is too thick it will not prevent the formation of vertical cracks in the smooth layer. Unfortunately, such cracks reduce the aerodynamic efficiency of the smooth coating reducing the benefit of the coating. - The challenge according to those documents is to provide a smooth layer that has a low roughness (Ra< 6 µm, preferentially <3 µm) without reducing the lifetime of the underlying thermal barrier coating. The roughness that can be achieved with the smooth layer is strongly affected by the layer porosity. Therefore a low porosity in the coating prior to polishing (< 1 %) is necessary. At low coating porosity the coating is stiff with a high Young's modulus. Due to this high modulus, thermo-mechanical stresses linked to the difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion between the smooth layer and the underlying TBC can be sufficient to induce cracking in one or both coatings. Depending on the coating architecture this can lead either to early TBC spallation or to smooth layer chipping and reduction of the aerodynamic performance.
- It is an object of the present invention to provide an effective and cost-efficient method for smoothing the surface of a coating that means reducing the roughness Ra of a ceramic TBC which is applied to a high thermally loaded gas turbine component made of a superalloy.
- It is another object of the disclosure to disclose an appropriate smooth coating system itself, comprising a TBC which is used for protection of gas turbine components and which improves the aerodynamic behavior and therefore increases the turbine efficiency and which is able to minimize the thermo-mechanical stresses.
- These and other objects are obtained by a method according to
claim 1. The disclosed method for reducing the roughness of a first coating with a defined coating composition and a thermal expansion coefficient, said coating covering the surface of a component to be thermally high loaded, comprises that - in a first step the roughness of said coating is measured and
- in a following step a second slurry coating is prepared for applying onto the surface of the first coating, whereby the coating composition of the second coating is tailored to have a similar thermal expansion coefficient like the first coating. The method is characterized in
- calculating a minimum number of coating spray passes necessary to provide the second slurry coating with a thickness that is at least two times the surface roughness of the first coating;
- applying the slurry coating with said calculated number of passes onto the surface of the first coating;
- fully curing, but only partially sintering the slurry coating at a temperature in the range of 300 to 800 °C and
- polishing the second coating to reduce the thickness such that finally the second coating does cover the first coating only locally.
- The last mentioned step is done by polishing the slurry down to the point where the "peaks" in the underlying TBC roughness are at the surface (visibly), and only the "valleys" in the TBC roughness remain filled with slurry coating.
- With such a technical solution a dense, thin coating for a smooth layer can be provided to minimize the thermo-mechanical stresses using a cost effective manufacturing process. Minimizing the smooth layer thickness and polishing it such that the smooth layer (= second coating) does not cover 100 % of the first coating surface after smoothening it, leaving some areas where the first coating is appearing.
- To achieve such a low smooth layer thickness without requiring a long time and cost consuming polishing process, the coating has to be manufactured such that it is dense, fully cured but only partially sintered to avoid too much recrystallization of the filler material. In this state the slurry coating can be described as a "machinable ceramic".
- According to an embodiment of the invention the curing resp. partially sintering of the slurry coating is done at a temperature in the range of 500 to 800 °C. The slurry coating is a zirconia based slurry coating with a small amount of alumina silicate or zirconium silicate. The zirconia can be un-stabilized or preferably stabilized, more preferably stabilized with Y2O3, CaO, MgO or any combinations thereof. The slurry coating binder is a silicate solution, phosphate solution or silicon emulsion. The first coating is a ceramic thermal barrier coating (TBC), preferably made of chemically stabilized zirconia. By using those materials it is realized that the thermal expansion coefficients of both coatings are close to each other.
- The described method is for coating systems where the first coating is applied by atmospheric plasma spraying and has therefore a relative high roughness and high porosity, which can cause the above described disadvantages, for example reduction of aerodynamic performance.
- The disclosed coating system for surface protection of a thermally high loaded component which is produced with a method according to
claims 1 is characterized in that the coating system consists of a first underlying coating and a second slurry coating overlaying the first coating, wherein both coatings (1, 2) have a chemical composition with a similar thermal expansion coefficient, and wherein the second coating is very dense with a porosity < 1%, fully cured, but only partly sintered and wherein the second coating does only cover locally the first coating, so that said coating system finally comprises a reduced roughness with respect to the roughness of the originally applied first coating. The coating system for surface protection of a thermally loaded component has a second coating which is only completely sintered as a result of the first firing in the engine. The disclosed coating system is applied onto the surface of a gas turbine component made of a Ni-, Co-, Fe-based superalloy or combinations thereof, wherein the first coating is a ceramic thermal barrier coating, preferably made of chemically stabilized zirconia and the second coating is made by applying of a zirconia based slurry. - The present invention is now to be explained more closely by means of different embodiments and with reference to the attached drawings.
- Fig. 1
- shows a typical cross section of a TBC as first coating and a very thin smooth layer (second coating) according to an embodiment of the present invention;
- Fig. 2
- shows schematically the results after different steps (2a-2c) of the disclosed method;
- Fig. 3
- shows the surface of a coating in service in form of a photo, when the coating is too thick (prior art) and
- Fig. 4
- shows the surface of a coating in form of a photo, where the coating was manufactured according to the present invention.
- The present invention is related to a method for smoothing the rough surface of thermal barrier coatings (TBC's) which are used for protection of thermal high loaded components, such as gas turbine blades, vanes or combustor parts.
- TBC's especially applied by atmospheric plasma spraying methods onto the surface of above mentioned components have a relative high roughness. For improving the aerodynamic behavior which allows increasing the turbine efficiency it is necessary to provide a smooth surface layer by an efficient method which is cheaper and faster with respect to the known methods in the prior art. Additionally, to improve perform in-service the smooth surface layer needs to be thinner.
- The present application discloses a method for reducing the roughness Ra of a
first coating 1 with a defined coating composition and a thermal expansion coefficient, saidcoating 1 covering the surface of a component 3 to be thermally high loaded, the method comprises that in a first step the roughness of saidcoating 1 is measured and in a following step asecond slurry coating 2 is prepared for applying onto the surface of thefirst coating 1, whereby the coating composition of thesecond coating 2 is tailored to have a similar thermal expansion coefficient like thefirst coating 1. The method is characterized in - calculating a minimum number of coating spray passes N necessary to provide the
second slurry coating 2 with a thickness T that is at least two times of the roughness of thefirst coating 1, - applying the
slurry coating 2 with said calculated number of spray passes N onto the surface of thefirst coating 1; - fully curing, but only partially sintering the
slurry coating 2 at a temperature in the range of 300 to 800 °C and - polishing the
second coating 2 to a reduced thickness T' such that finally thesecond coating 2 does cover thefirst coating 1 only locally (i.e. The "valleys" in the underlying TBC roughness are filled with dense slurry.). - With such a technical solution a
dense coating 2 for a smooth layer can be provided to minimize the thermo-mechanical stresses using a cost effective manufacturing process. Minimizing the smooth layer thickness T and polishing it to a reduced thickness T' such that the smooth layer (= second coating 2) does not cover 100 % of the first coating's 1 surface after smoothening it, leaving some areas where thefirst coating 1 is appearing. - To achieve such a low smooth layer thickness without requiring a long time and cost consuming polishing process, the coating has to be manufactured such that it is dense, fully cured, but only partially sintered to avoid too much recrystallization of the filler material.
- According to an embodiment of the invention the curing resp. partially sintering of the slurry coating is done at a temperature in the range of 500-800 °C.
-
Fig. 1 shows a photo of the microstructure (cross section) of atypical TBC 1 with asmooth layer 2 on the top according to one embodiment of the invention, where the desired reduction in surface roughness is achieved. Thesmooth layer 2 is very thin to the extent that the slurry fills the "valleys" in the underlying TBC roughness. - The "peaks" in the underlying TBC roughness are not covered by the slurry coating. The slurry is in the "valleys" of the underlying TBC roughness. The "peaks" in the underlying TBC roughness are not covered by the slurry coating.
- The embodiment in
Fig. 1 is a component produced with the method according to the present disclosure. The component is made of Hastelloy X base material. It has an APS MCrAlY bond coat. The TBC (first coating 1) is APS 7 wt% yttria-stabilized zirconia. The slurry coating (second coating 2) is un-stabilized zirconia with the addition of a small amount of alumina silicate. The slurry coating binder was a water based silicon emulsion. The average initial TBC roughness Ra was 17.2µm. The average initial TBC thickness was 941µm, measured non-destructively with eddy-current equipment. The slurry coating was applied with a commercial paint sprayer. The number of spray passes N was 6. The eddy-current thickness measurements of the as sprayed slurry plus the TBC had an average value of 982 µm, thus theaverage slurry coting 2 thickness T was 41µm. The slurry was cured at 700°C for 5h. After curing theslurry coating 2 was polished with a fine grit wet silicon-carbide paper. After polishing the finial average roughness Ra' was found to be 2.8 µm. The non-destructive eddy-current thickness measurements of the as smooth layer plus the TBC had an average value of 945 µm. From the cross section photos the deepest slurry filed "valley" depth was 21µm. - The partially sintered
slurry coating 2 is inherently softer than theTBC coating 1. During the beginning of polishing of the softer slurry coating, the abrasion rate is relatively high. As the slurry coating becomes thinner and the tops of the harder TBC "peaks" in the roughness are reached the polishing abrasion rates slows and even stops. Thus leaving only the TBC "valleys" in the roughness are filled with the slurry coating. The zirconia based slurry coating has a small amount of alumina silicate or zirconium silicate. The zirconia can be unstabilized or stabilized with Y2O3, CaO, MgO or any combinations thereof. The slurry coating binder is a silicate solution, phosphate solution or silicon emulsion. The first coating is a ceramic thermal barrier coating (TBC), preferably made of chemically stabilized zirconia. By using those materials it is realized that the thermal expansion coefficients of both coatings are close to each other. - The described method is effective for coating systems where the first coating is applied by atmospheric plasma spraying and has therefore a relative high roughness, which can cause the above described disadvantages, for example reduction of aerodynamic performance.
- The disclosed coating system or surface protection of a thermally high loaded component which is produced with a method according to
claims 1 is characterized in that the coating system consists of a first underlying coating and a second slurry coating overlaying the first coating, wherein bothcoatings -
Fig. 2 shows schematically the results after different steps of the disclosed method. -
Fig. 2a shows thefirst coating 1 prior to the applying of the second coating - the high roughness Ra is clearly to be seen, it is about 8-18 µm. -
Fig. 2b shows the system with thefirst coating 1 and the appliedsecond coating 2. The roughness of the first coating Ra is the same like inFig. 2a , but theoverlying coating 2 may provide a smooth surface however it is too thick (with an average thickness T≥2xRa) and may crack during serves. -
Fig. 2c shows the result after the last step of the described method according toclaim 1. The coating system comprises thefirst coating 1 with thesecond coat 2 and a reduced roughness Ra' (which is about 1-6 µm) with respect to the originally appliedcoating 1. The reduced thickness T' of thesecond coating 2 is T'≈ Ra, such that finally thesecond coating 2 does cover thefirst coating 1 only locally. - According to an embodiment of the invention, the number of spray passes N, the thicknesses T, T' and roughness Ra, Ra' are coupled, by approximately N ≥ T/R (with R= deposition rate for one spray pass N), T ≥ 2xRa, after smoothing T' ≈ Ra, which may require optimizing for special composition and coating equipment.
-
Fig. 3 shows in a photo the surface of a coating in service, when the smooth surface coating is too thick (prior art). A lot of undesired cracks can be recognized. - In contrast to
Fig. 3 Fig. 4 shows in a photo the surface of a coating system manufactured according to the present invention. The dark spots are the TBC appearing at the surface after the polishing step. Microcracks / cracks can't be recognized. The dark spots are the "peaks" in the underlying TBC roughness appearing at the surface. - The durability of the coating is ensured, providing improved aerodynamic performance over a long period of operation. There is also no thermal barrier coating lifetime reduction due to the smoothened surface.
-
- 1
- first coating, preferably TBC
- 2
- second coating, slurry coating
- 3
- thermally loaded component, for example gas turbine blade
- 4
- coating system
- Ra
- roughness of the surface (of the first coating 1)
- Ra'
- reduced final roughness of the surface
- T
- thickness of pos. 2
- T'
- reduced thickness of pos. 2
- N
- number of coating spray passes for pos. 2
- R
- deposition rate for one spray pass
Claims (4)
- Method for reducing the roughness (Ra) of a ceramic thermal barrier coating (1) with a defined coating composition and thermal expansion coefficient, said ceramic thermal barrier coating (1) covering the surface of a Ni-, Co-, Fe-based superalloy component (3) of a gas turbine to be thermally high loaded, wherein:- in a first step the ceramic thermal barrier coating (1) is applied onto the surface of a component (3) by atmospheric plasma spraying and the roughness (Ra) of said ceramic thermal barrier coating (1) is measured and- in a following step a zirconia based slurry coating (2) with alumina silicate or zirconium silicate additives and a slurry coating binder being a silicate solution, phosphate solution or silicon emulsion is prepared for applying onto the surface of the ceramic thermal barrier coating (1), the coating composition of the zirconia based slurry coating (2) being tailored to have a similar thermal expansion coefficient like the ceramic thermal barrier coating (1);- calculating a minimum number of coating spray passes (N) necessary to provide the zirconia based slurry coating (2) with a thickness (T) that is at least two times of the roughness (Ra) of the ceramic thermal barrier coating (1),- applying the zirconia based slurry coating (2) with said calculated number of spray passes (N) onto the surface of the ceramic thermal barrier coating (1);- fully curing, but only partially sintering the zirconia based slurry coating (2) at a temperature in the range of 300 to 800°C;- polishing the zirconia based slurry coating (2);- completely sintering the zirconia based coating (2) only after the first exposition to thermal loaded operation of the component (3);the polishing step is performed until the peaks of the roughness (Ra) are reached so the thickness (T) of the zirconia based slurry coating (2) becomes a reduced thickness (T') substantially equal to the roughness (Ra) of the ceramic thermal barrier coating (1) such that finally the zirconia based slurry coating (2) does cover the ceramic thermal barrier coating (1) only locally at the valleys of the roughness (Ra).
- Method according to claim 1, characterized in curing resp. partially sintering the slurry coating (2) at a temperature in the range of 500 to 800 °C.
- Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the zirconia is stabilized with Y2O3, CaO, MgO or any combinations thereof.
- Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the ceramic thermal barrier coating (1) is made of chemically stabilized zirconia.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14178573.3A EP2977487B1 (en) | 2014-07-25 | 2014-07-25 | Method for smoothing the surface of a coating |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14178573.3A EP2977487B1 (en) | 2014-07-25 | 2014-07-25 | Method for smoothing the surface of a coating |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2977487A1 EP2977487A1 (en) | 2016-01-27 |
EP2977487B1 true EP2977487B1 (en) | 2018-09-05 |
Family
ID=51229823
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP14178573.3A Active EP2977487B1 (en) | 2014-07-25 | 2014-07-25 | Method for smoothing the surface of a coating |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2977487B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN115044898B (en) * | 2022-06-24 | 2023-09-01 | 武汉苏泊尔炊具有限公司 | Method for manufacturing cooker and cooker |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6294261B1 (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2001-09-25 | General Electric Company | Method for smoothing the surface of a protective coating |
WO2009030049A1 (en) * | 2007-09-06 | 2009-03-12 | Alcan International Limited | A coating for metallurgical surfaces |
US9624583B2 (en) * | 2009-04-01 | 2017-04-18 | Rolls-Royce Corporation | Slurry-based coating techniques for smoothing surface imperfections |
US8986779B2 (en) * | 2009-07-31 | 2015-03-24 | General Electric Company | Methods of improving surface roughness of an environmental barrier coating and components comprising environmental barrier coatings having improved surface roughness |
-
2014
- 2014-07-25 EP EP14178573.3A patent/EP2977487B1/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2977487A1 (en) | 2016-01-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9624583B2 (en) | Slurry-based coating techniques for smoothing surface imperfections | |
EP3141631B1 (en) | Applying silicon metal-containing bond layer to ceramic or ceramic matrix composite substrates | |
JP5437555B2 (en) | Process for producing bond coats of silicon-containing substrates for EBC and the like | |
US7862901B2 (en) | Yttria containing thermal barrier coating topcoat layer and method for applying the coating layer | |
US20090274850A1 (en) | Low cost non-line-of -sight protective coatings | |
JP5067775B2 (en) | Process for producing corrosion-resistant EBC bond coats and the like for silicon-containing substrates | |
US20090324401A1 (en) | Article having a protective coating and methods | |
US7090894B2 (en) | Bondcoat for the application of TBC's and wear coatings to oxide ceramic matrix | |
EP2287138A2 (en) | Techniques for depositing coating on ceramic substrate | |
EP1686199B1 (en) | Thermal barrier coating system | |
JP3434504B2 (en) | Insulation method for metal substrate | |
JP5663246B2 (en) | Compositions and methods for thermal coating systems | |
KR20080067980A (en) | Gas turbine engine coating method and apparatus | |
JP2004360699A (en) | Industrial turbine nozzle blade-form part, top coating system for other hot gas passage constituent part, and method related to the top coating system | |
EP3748031B1 (en) | Reflective coating and coating process therefor | |
EP3068924B1 (en) | Ceramic coated articles and manufacture methods | |
EP3640360B1 (en) | Method of manufacturing a geometrically segmented abradable ceramic thermal barrier coating with improved spallation resistance | |
EP1780308A2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for manufacturing a component | |
EP2977487B1 (en) | Method for smoothing the surface of a coating | |
US20050100757A1 (en) | Thermal barrier coating having a heat radiation absorbing topcoat | |
US20150004308A1 (en) | Method for creating a textured bond coat surface |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY GMBH |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20160726 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ANSALDO ENERGIA IP UK LIMITED |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: C23C 24/08 20060101AFI20180126BHEP Ipc: C04B 41/00 20060101ALI20180126BHEP Ipc: C23C 28/04 20060101ALI20180126BHEP Ipc: F01D 5/28 20060101ALI20180126BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180226 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1037901 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180915 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602014031651 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20180905 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181205 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181206 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181205 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1037901 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180905 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190105 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190105 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602014031651 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190606 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20190725 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20190731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190725 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190731 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190731 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190725 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190725 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20140725 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180905 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20240430 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240719 Year of fee payment: 11 |